Slides about the REF (Research Excellence Framework) presented by Chris Forst at the Association for AJE (Association for Journalism Education) January conference.
Prof. Bleddyn Davies #PP40 presentation slidesPP40
1) The document discusses whether the Production of Welfare Approach (POW) has been overtaken, undermined, or still underpins current policy discourse.
2) POW focuses on equity, effectiveness, and efficiency using personal services and long-term wellbeing, and uses tools for policy design, evaluation, and scenario simulation.
3) POW has not been overtaken or undermined, and still influences UK social care policy discourse as well as policies in other countries, though maintaining focus on key social care concerns may be challenging.
This document discusses approaches to evidence-based policymaking, including:
1) Evidence-based grant making which funds programs with rigorous evidence and requires continuous evaluation.
2) What Works Clearinghouses which are websites that provide information on effective social programs.
3) Systematic reviews of agency portfolios which involve an independent agency reviewing programs and linking additional funds to outcomes.
Charla de John D. Falk y Lynn Dierking (Oregon State University) en el curso sobre Aprendizaje por libre elección dictado a educadores de museos de Colombia (with permission). Por traducir con su colaboración.
The document discusses potential changes to Scotland's SQA appeals service qualifications in light of new developments. It proposes widening eligibility for alternative evidence and expanding centre support services. Stakeholders including teachers, coordinators, and assessors provided feedback that the current process prioritizes acceptable evidence over quality learning and lacks fairness for absent and appealing candidates. A new process is outlined separating exceptional circumstance requests pre-results from a post-results enquiry service allowing centres to query results through different steps.
This slideshow explains the complete process of writing research proposal for funding agencies. It is useful for the PhD students, researchers, R& D department of company personnel.
Presentation by Sally Curry at the Aarhus Conference on Research Publication, Denmark, January 2010.
A blog on the event can be found at http://www.rin.ac.uk/research-assessment-denmark
The document discusses changes to A-level assessments and assessment objectives. It provides details on the assessment objectives for different subjects, including Business Studies and Geography. The assessment objectives focus on knowledge, application, analysis, evaluation, and research skills. Exams will assess students' ability to analyze and interpret information, evaluate issues and viewpoints, and apply their understanding to unfamiliar contexts at varying scales.
This seminar gave an insider’s view on bidding for EU research funds. It focused on EU FP7 IST research instruments (IPs, STREPS etc), what they are, how they are evaluated, why bids fail and what a successful bid looks like.
Prof. Bleddyn Davies #PP40 presentation slidesPP40
1) The document discusses whether the Production of Welfare Approach (POW) has been overtaken, undermined, or still underpins current policy discourse.
2) POW focuses on equity, effectiveness, and efficiency using personal services and long-term wellbeing, and uses tools for policy design, evaluation, and scenario simulation.
3) POW has not been overtaken or undermined, and still influences UK social care policy discourse as well as policies in other countries, though maintaining focus on key social care concerns may be challenging.
This document discusses approaches to evidence-based policymaking, including:
1) Evidence-based grant making which funds programs with rigorous evidence and requires continuous evaluation.
2) What Works Clearinghouses which are websites that provide information on effective social programs.
3) Systematic reviews of agency portfolios which involve an independent agency reviewing programs and linking additional funds to outcomes.
Charla de John D. Falk y Lynn Dierking (Oregon State University) en el curso sobre Aprendizaje por libre elección dictado a educadores de museos de Colombia (with permission). Por traducir con su colaboración.
The document discusses potential changes to Scotland's SQA appeals service qualifications in light of new developments. It proposes widening eligibility for alternative evidence and expanding centre support services. Stakeholders including teachers, coordinators, and assessors provided feedback that the current process prioritizes acceptable evidence over quality learning and lacks fairness for absent and appealing candidates. A new process is outlined separating exceptional circumstance requests pre-results from a post-results enquiry service allowing centres to query results through different steps.
This slideshow explains the complete process of writing research proposal for funding agencies. It is useful for the PhD students, researchers, R& D department of company personnel.
Presentation by Sally Curry at the Aarhus Conference on Research Publication, Denmark, January 2010.
A blog on the event can be found at http://www.rin.ac.uk/research-assessment-denmark
The document discusses changes to A-level assessments and assessment objectives. It provides details on the assessment objectives for different subjects, including Business Studies and Geography. The assessment objectives focus on knowledge, application, analysis, evaluation, and research skills. Exams will assess students' ability to analyze and interpret information, evaluate issues and viewpoints, and apply their understanding to unfamiliar contexts at varying scales.
This seminar gave an insider’s view on bidding for EU research funds. It focused on EU FP7 IST research instruments (IPs, STREPS etc), what they are, how they are evaluated, why bids fail and what a successful bid looks like.
Nomeli P. Nunez is an Associate Professor at Georgia State University with over 15 years of experience in cancer and nutrition research. She has a PhD in Pharmacology/Toxicology from Washington State University and has received grants from NIH, American Cancer Society, and Longevity Foundation. Her expertise includes scientific writing, grant review, project management, data analysis, and mentoring graduate students. Previously, she was an Assistant Professor at University of Texas at Austin where she led research programs and supervised laboratory activities.
This is presentation on library assessment at Pitt University Library System delivered to iSchool Academic Librarianship Graduate students. December 2015.
VU University Amsterdam
Quality Improvement
Health Care Delivery
Hospital Quality
Low and Middle Income Countries
Developing Countries
Resource-Restricted Settings
Optimising benefits from Canadian Research - Janet HalliwellCASRAI
Janet Halliwell, Chair CASRAI; Co-Chair Admin Burden Canada collective; Chair CSPC
Dominique Bérubé, Vice-President Research Programs, SSHRC
Jim Woodgett, Director of Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Can We Demonstrate the Difference that Norwegian Aid makes? - Evaluation of t...Itad Ltd
This document summarizes the key findings and recommendations from an evaluation of Norway's aid administration's results measurement system. The evaluation assessed whether internal policies, staff training, and evaluation practices sufficiently emphasized measuring aid results. It found the following:
1) Existing policies and guidance for results measurement in grant management were insufficient and not adequately implemented.
2) Staff training on results measurement had gaps and was not prioritized.
3) Evaluations commissioned by Norway's Evaluation Department did not sufficiently focus on measuring outcomes and impacts.
The evaluation recommended both technical changes to strengthen results measurement policies and practices, as well as structural changes to address capacity issues. It suggested improving guidance, training, and oversight of both grant reporting and external
Sustainability of GEPs and Networks in Research Funding OrganisationsSUPERA project
Presentation held by Jana Dvořáčková (Technology Agency of the Czech Republic) during the Supera Final Conference, organised by SUPERA on 25 March 2022.
Evaluating complex change across projects and contexts: Methodological lesson...Itad Ltd
This document discusses the methodology used to evaluate DFID's social accountability portfolio, which included 361 diverse projects. The evaluation used Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) on 50 cases and narrative analysis on 13 case studies. Combining QCA with narrative analysis provided both numerical evidence from a large number of cases and in-depth qualitative analysis to interpret the QCA findings. Some challenges encountered were data quality issues, difficulty unpacking complex context factors, and limitations due to the project timeline not allowing for full iteration between methods. Overall, mixing QCA and narrative analysis proved useful for understanding what approaches worked best across different contexts.
Mitchell Wong, M.D. Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine
Executive Vice Chair for Research Training in the Department of Medicine.
Director of the CTSI KL2 Program,
Executive co-Director of the UCLA Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program,
Co-Director of the UCLA NRSA Primary Care Fellowship
2017 WRoCAH AHRC Competition applications (optimized)Caryn Douglas
The document provides information about the White Rose College of Arts and Humanities (WRoCAH), a collaborative doctoral training partnership between the Universities of Leeds, Sheffield, and York. It details the funding opportunities for PhD students through WRoCAH, including fees and stipend awards from the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) worth over £19 million. Students accepted into WRoCAH receive membership in a cohort, access to training programs, and additional funding for research support and mobility. The training involves events and colloquiums over the three years to facilitate learning and skills development.
This basically covers the aspects of Research Uptake and Knowledge Translation which will be useful to those who are interested in health communication and uptake of research evidence to different audiences in Public or Private sectors.
Implementing a mixed-methods protocol in impact evaluation: challenges and op...valéry ridde
Presentation realised for an organised session on Application and challenges to the use of mixed methods in health systems research, held at HSR 2016, the Fourth Global Symposium on Health Systems Research, Vancouver, 14-18 november 2016.
Author: Manuela De Allegri
David Fleming held a seminar on monitoring and evaluation in conflict-affected environments at the Post-war Reconstruction and Development Unit (PRDU), University of York.
The document discusses university ranking systems and Pakistan's performance in various rankings. It provides an overview of popular global university rankings like QS, THE, ARWU, USNWR, and subject-specific rankings. It outlines the methodology, indicators and Pakistan's ranking in these systems. Additionally, it presents Punjab University's efforts to improve its ranking by focusing on key indicators like faculty, students, research, reputation and finances. It recommends further strategies like establishing a data center, international student office and improving ICT facilities.
The document provides feedback on a draft summary report for research evaluation methodology in the Czech Republic. It covers many topics and opinions are divided on several issues. Some view the reports as well-written and justified while others see them as too general. There is contrasting feedback on topics like self-assessment, treatment of PhD students and temporary workers, and assessment of research environment. The document also notes a few incorrect statements in the draft report and provides counterpoints on issues like applied research outputs and dividing duties between teaching and research. It advocates for a learning process to begin in applying the new methodology.
A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application (2020)UCLA CTSI
William Parks, PhD
Professor of Medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and UCLA
Associate Dean for Graduate Research Education
Scientific Director, Women’s Guild Lung Institute
This document discusses author-level bibliometrics and the multi-dimensional research assessment matrix. It presents the matrix, which outlines different units of assessment, purposes of assessment, output dimensions, and appropriate bibliometric and other indicators for evaluation. The document also provides examples of how bibliometric indicators can be used to operationalize different policy issues and measures. It notes challenges such as evaluating individuals based on collaborative work and the need for multiple indicators and expert review in research assessment.
This document summarizes a presentation on engaging with data journalism. The presentation discusses:
1) Using open data and open source tools to analyze and visualize data, allowing newsrooms to access data more easily.
2) Available data tools that can help journalists find, store, filter, analyze and visualize data.
3) The key challenge of changing newsroom workflows to incorporate data-driven journalism and the need to build data literacy and skills over time.
4) The opportunity for journalists to build trust with users by answering clear questions and putting numbers into context with data-driven stories.
A delivered to undergraduates studying Journalism in Practice at Birmingham City Uni. The course covers all aspects of journalism by giving them plenty of practice. This week we look at interviews.
Nomeli P. Nunez is an Associate Professor at Georgia State University with over 15 years of experience in cancer and nutrition research. She has a PhD in Pharmacology/Toxicology from Washington State University and has received grants from NIH, American Cancer Society, and Longevity Foundation. Her expertise includes scientific writing, grant review, project management, data analysis, and mentoring graduate students. Previously, she was an Assistant Professor at University of Texas at Austin where she led research programs and supervised laboratory activities.
This is presentation on library assessment at Pitt University Library System delivered to iSchool Academic Librarianship Graduate students. December 2015.
VU University Amsterdam
Quality Improvement
Health Care Delivery
Hospital Quality
Low and Middle Income Countries
Developing Countries
Resource-Restricted Settings
Optimising benefits from Canadian Research - Janet HalliwellCASRAI
Janet Halliwell, Chair CASRAI; Co-Chair Admin Burden Canada collective; Chair CSPC
Dominique Bérubé, Vice-President Research Programs, SSHRC
Jim Woodgett, Director of Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Can We Demonstrate the Difference that Norwegian Aid makes? - Evaluation of t...Itad Ltd
This document summarizes the key findings and recommendations from an evaluation of Norway's aid administration's results measurement system. The evaluation assessed whether internal policies, staff training, and evaluation practices sufficiently emphasized measuring aid results. It found the following:
1) Existing policies and guidance for results measurement in grant management were insufficient and not adequately implemented.
2) Staff training on results measurement had gaps and was not prioritized.
3) Evaluations commissioned by Norway's Evaluation Department did not sufficiently focus on measuring outcomes and impacts.
The evaluation recommended both technical changes to strengthen results measurement policies and practices, as well as structural changes to address capacity issues. It suggested improving guidance, training, and oversight of both grant reporting and external
Sustainability of GEPs and Networks in Research Funding OrganisationsSUPERA project
Presentation held by Jana Dvořáčková (Technology Agency of the Czech Republic) during the Supera Final Conference, organised by SUPERA on 25 March 2022.
Evaluating complex change across projects and contexts: Methodological lesson...Itad Ltd
This document discusses the methodology used to evaluate DFID's social accountability portfolio, which included 361 diverse projects. The evaluation used Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) on 50 cases and narrative analysis on 13 case studies. Combining QCA with narrative analysis provided both numerical evidence from a large number of cases and in-depth qualitative analysis to interpret the QCA findings. Some challenges encountered were data quality issues, difficulty unpacking complex context factors, and limitations due to the project timeline not allowing for full iteration between methods. Overall, mixing QCA and narrative analysis proved useful for understanding what approaches worked best across different contexts.
Mitchell Wong, M.D. Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine
Executive Vice Chair for Research Training in the Department of Medicine.
Director of the CTSI KL2 Program,
Executive co-Director of the UCLA Specialty Training and Advanced Research (STAR) Program,
Co-Director of the UCLA NRSA Primary Care Fellowship
2017 WRoCAH AHRC Competition applications (optimized)Caryn Douglas
The document provides information about the White Rose College of Arts and Humanities (WRoCAH), a collaborative doctoral training partnership between the Universities of Leeds, Sheffield, and York. It details the funding opportunities for PhD students through WRoCAH, including fees and stipend awards from the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) worth over £19 million. Students accepted into WRoCAH receive membership in a cohort, access to training programs, and additional funding for research support and mobility. The training involves events and colloquiums over the three years to facilitate learning and skills development.
This basically covers the aspects of Research Uptake and Knowledge Translation which will be useful to those who are interested in health communication and uptake of research evidence to different audiences in Public or Private sectors.
Implementing a mixed-methods protocol in impact evaluation: challenges and op...valéry ridde
Presentation realised for an organised session on Application and challenges to the use of mixed methods in health systems research, held at HSR 2016, the Fourth Global Symposium on Health Systems Research, Vancouver, 14-18 november 2016.
Author: Manuela De Allegri
David Fleming held a seminar on monitoring and evaluation in conflict-affected environments at the Post-war Reconstruction and Development Unit (PRDU), University of York.
The document discusses university ranking systems and Pakistan's performance in various rankings. It provides an overview of popular global university rankings like QS, THE, ARWU, USNWR, and subject-specific rankings. It outlines the methodology, indicators and Pakistan's ranking in these systems. Additionally, it presents Punjab University's efforts to improve its ranking by focusing on key indicators like faculty, students, research, reputation and finances. It recommends further strategies like establishing a data center, international student office and improving ICT facilities.
The document provides feedback on a draft summary report for research evaluation methodology in the Czech Republic. It covers many topics and opinions are divided on several issues. Some view the reports as well-written and justified while others see them as too general. There is contrasting feedback on topics like self-assessment, treatment of PhD students and temporary workers, and assessment of research environment. The document also notes a few incorrect statements in the draft report and provides counterpoints on issues like applied research outputs and dividing duties between teaching and research. It advocates for a learning process to begin in applying the new methodology.
A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application (2020)UCLA CTSI
William Parks, PhD
Professor of Medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and UCLA
Associate Dean for Graduate Research Education
Scientific Director, Women’s Guild Lung Institute
This document discusses author-level bibliometrics and the multi-dimensional research assessment matrix. It presents the matrix, which outlines different units of assessment, purposes of assessment, output dimensions, and appropriate bibliometric and other indicators for evaluation. The document also provides examples of how bibliometric indicators can be used to operationalize different policy issues and measures. It notes challenges such as evaluating individuals based on collaborative work and the need for multiple indicators and expert review in research assessment.
This document summarizes a presentation on engaging with data journalism. The presentation discusses:
1) Using open data and open source tools to analyze and visualize data, allowing newsrooms to access data more easily.
2) Available data tools that can help journalists find, store, filter, analyze and visualize data.
3) The key challenge of changing newsroom workflows to incorporate data-driven journalism and the need to build data literacy and skills over time.
4) The opportunity for journalists to build trust with users by answering clear questions and putting numbers into context with data-driven stories.
A delivered to undergraduates studying Journalism in Practice at Birmingham City Uni. The course covers all aspects of journalism by giving them plenty of practice. This week we look at interviews.
Raju Narisetti London Presentation July 2012Dan Davies
The document discusses how journalism is facing challenges in the digital age to engage and retain audiences. It argues that newsrooms must shift their focus from creating great content to providing great user experiences by better integrating journalism, technology, and audience needs. Developers and journalists must work together to build immersive and dynamic experiences across multiple platforms to attract and keep the increasingly promiscuous digital audience.
Blaz Zgaga - Arms Smuggling Trilogy in the name of the state Dan Davies
The document discusses arms smuggling from the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. It describes how thousands of documents were obtained through freedom of information requests that detailed arms shipments. The arms were obtained from stockpiles in Slovenia and other eastern European countries and shipped to Croatia and Bosnia during their wars for independence. Key players included politicians and arms dealers in Slovenia and other countries who facilitated the shipments for profit. The document outlines the multi-step process investigators used to analyze documents and interviews and produce a trilogy of books detailing the arms smuggling network and those involved.
MA Magazines: City Uni - Further Wordpress customisations, process and plugin...Dan Davies
The document discusses various WordPress plugins that can help with customization, security, maintenance, branding, editorial workflow, social media integration, multimedia, mobile optimization, SEO, and analytics. It provides descriptions and recommendations for plugins related to layouts, login security, maintenance modes, styling, subbing processes, comment systems, photo sharing, video embedding, mobile themes, SEO optimization, and analyzing site statistics.
Aine Mcguire Newsroom 360 - Data Journalism DayDan Davies
The document summarizes a Newsroom 360 Data Day event with @ainemcguire from ScraperWiki. The event covered collecting, cleaning, analyzing, and visualizing data from various sources like Excel, CSV, PDF, and HTML files. It also discussed scraping data from horrible formats into cleaner, more useful formats and examples of scraping data on NOTAMs, presidential travel, and fire-related news stories.
1) This document discusses approaches for evaluating academic research performance using reliable and efficient indicators.
2) It suggests using a combination of quantitative, qualitative, and impact/visibility analyses to better understand research performance rather than relying solely on quantitative metrics.
3) The document advocates establishing benchmarks at multiple levels - global, national, institutional, and individual - to provide appropriate context for performance evaluations.
The document summarizes an independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management in the UK. It provides an overview of the review's approach, including gathering evidence through a literature review, public call for evidence, and stakeholder workshops. Preliminary findings indicate metrics can potentially enhance peer review if used responsibly and with transparency. The review will issue a final report in July with recommendations for universities, funders, and other groups on responsible use of quantitative and qualitative data in research evaluation.
1) Global university rankings are increasingly influencing higher education institutions, governments, and students. Many institutions have strategic plans aiming to improve their rankings by focusing on research outputs, recruiting top faculty and students, and reorganizing departments.
2) Governments are also responding by launching excellence initiatives to concentrate resources in top universities, differentiating institutions according to mission, and linking funding to rankings or performance metrics.
3) While rankings have accelerated reforms, they also risk distorting priorities and behaviors if indicators do not adequately measure institutions. The best approach to assessing quality and competitiveness remains open to debate.
The document discusses university rankings, including:
1) University rankings were invented in the US and have spread globally due to factors like globalization and the need to compare higher education institutions.
2) Rankings can help or hinder universities depending on how they are measured and weighted. Key factors include research output, faculty achievements, and student outcomes.
3) Improving rankings requires transparent and standardized criteria that account for universities' diverse missions rather than a "one-size-fits-all" approach.
Evaluation of scientific research | Research design and methodologyPubrica
https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/
The evaluation of scientific research involves assessing the quality, validity, and impact of research studies. It helps determine the credibility and reliability of the findings and contributes to the overall advancement of knowledge.
Read more @ https://pubrica.com/insights/experimental-methodology/evaluation-of-scientific-research/
This document provides information about impact and career support for researchers. It discusses the importance of impact in securing government funding for bioscience research. It defines how research councils view impact and provides examples of impact pathways. The document encourages researchers to consider impact from the beginning of their research and describes various types of support available, including fellowships, networking opportunities, and programs to facilitate commercialization.
Assessing societal impact: what have we learned from the UK REF?ORCID, Inc
The document summarizes what was learned from assessing research impact as part of the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) in 2014. Three key lessons learned were: 1) Preparing impact assessments led universities to change practices like implementing impact strategies and tracking impact evidence; 2) The impact assessment process generally worked well but could be improved, such as allowing more nuanced scoring; 3) The REF revealed diverse impacts across all fields and generated insights into how high quality research leads to impacts.
Framework for ranking higher institutions in nigeriastatisense
This presentation looks at the methodologies of five international bodies that rates higher institutions across the world with the aim of providing a guiding framework for ranking Nigerian institutions.
valuation is a methodological area that is closely related to, but distinguishable from more traditional social research. Evaluation utilizes many of the same methodologies used in traditional social research, but because evaluation takes place within a political and organizational context, it requires group skills, management ability, political dexterity, sensitivity to multiple stakeholders and other skills that social research in general does not rely on as much.
Unveiling the Ecosystem of Science: How can we characterize and assess divers...Nicolas Robinson-Garcia
This document outlines a proposed valuation model for assessing individual scientists. It aims to address shortcomings of current assessment methods that focus only on excellence, outputs, and universal criteria. The model would combine expert judgment with metrics to evaluate multiple dimensions of scientists' work, including scientific engagement, social engagement, background, capacity building, and openness. Case studies of scientists would examine how reported activities fit within this model and relate to factors like seniority, diversity, and values not currently considered. The next step would be to test the model through an experimental structured expert judgment assessment. Feedback on the proposal is sought to help improve the model.
2012.06.07 Maximising the Impact of Social Sciences ResearchNUI Galway
Jane Tinkler, Public Policy Group Manager, Impact of Social Science Project at London School of Economics presented this seminar "Maximising the Impact of Social Sciences Research" as part of the Whitaker Institute Seminar Series at the Whitaker Institute on 7th June 2012.
Doctor of Education in Educational LeadershipThe Doctor of EDustiBuckner14
The Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership program at Temple University prepares students to become effective administrators and visionary leaders through coursework that combines theoretical foundations with an applied focus. Students learn skills in leading organizations, managing change, and applying research to solve real-world problems. The executive cohort-based program consists of fixed courses offered one weekend per month over three years. Graduates are prepared to conduct research and lead schools, districts, and other organizations by developing professional wisdom to manage complex change.
The document discusses peer review processes for research funding and publications. It defines peer review as the evaluation of scientific work by qualified experts in the same field. The key areas of peer review application are the evaluation of research findings for publication, research/innovation proposals for funding, and the evaluation of research teams/institutions. The document outlines best practices for designing peer review processes, including selecting qualified peers, developing assessment criteria, and establishing review panels to evaluate and rank proposals in a transparent, impartial manner.
We live in an age of research measurement. In this session we consider the current form of the REF, how it effects both a university’s relationship with research and the developing careers of early-career researchers. The session will also consider what you can do to make sure you are best equipped and ‘in the know’ for the demands of the REF once you apply for and start an academic job.
This document provides information for prospective graduate students about pursuing a graduate degree in life sciences. It discusses the skills and career opportunities that come with a graduate degree, including research, teaching, industry careers, and more. It provides tips for applying to graduate school, including identifying suitable supervisors and labs, drafting a strong application, and applying for funding. Overall, it encourages students to pursue graduate education if interested in a career with continual learning where they can contribute to important scientific fields.
The document summarizes the requirements for obtaining a PhD from the University of Adelaide. It states that a PhD involves 3-4 years of original research under supervision, resulting in a thesis that makes an original contribution to knowledge in the chosen discipline. Candidates must demonstrate in-depth knowledge of their research topic, relate it to broader frameworks, and show independent and original thought. Thesis formats can include a written narrative, publications, or a creative work with an exegesis.
The document summarizes the requirements for obtaining a PhD from the University of Adelaide. It states that a PhD involves 3-4 years of original research under supervision, which develops the capacity for independent research. Candidates must complete an approved program of study and research, and present a thesis demonstrating significant contributions to their field. The thesis can take various forms, but examiners will evaluate the candidate's knowledge, ability to relate their research to the broader field, independence, and contribution to knowledge.
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
Communicating effectively and consistently with students can help them feel at ease during their learning experience and provide the instructor with a communication trail to track the course's progress. This workshop will take you through constructing an engaging course container to facilitate effective communication.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdf
Ref 2014 for aje
1. Research and the REF
What is the REF and why is it
important to me and my
institutiton?
2. Why research?
Research supports teaching
Research supports work with industry
Research differentiates HE from FE
Research adds to student experience
Research attracts income
Research develops reputation
3. Support
Good research:
links with scholarly activity;
Links with industry;
Adds depth to your teaching;
Keeps you better focussed;
Keeps you in better contact.
4. Income
Research attracts income:
Through applying for research grants;
From Hefce as apportioned by the REF;
By making links with industry that they are
prepared to fund.
5. Income and reputation
Attract students;
Attract partners from industry or other
institutions;
Attract international links and students
6. What is the REF?
The REF will:
• inform the selective allocation of research
funding to HEIs on the basis of excellence
• provide benchmarking information and
reputational yardsticks
• provide accountability for public investment in
research and demonstrate its benefits.
7. What are UoAs?
Units of assessment assess quality of
research in a specific range of subject
disciplines:
UoA 36 covers Communication, Cultural
and Media Studies, Library and
Information Management
This includes journalism, which is
specifically mentioned in the more detailed
description.
8. Timetable
2010 Appoint panels
2011 Publish assessment criteria
2013 (July 31): end of assessment period
2013 (Oct 31): Census date for eligible staff
2013 (Nov 29): Closing date for submissions
2013 (Dec 31): Closing date for outcomes
2014 Panels assess. Outcomes published in
December
9. REF Submission
A submission will include:
Research outputs (worth 65%)
Assessed in terms of their ‘rigour, originality and significance’, with
reference to international research quality standards.
Impact (worth 20%)
The sub-panels will assess social and economic impacts arising
from research in terms of their ‘reach and significance’.
Environment (Worth 15%)
The sub-panels will assess the research environment in terms of its
‘sustainability, vitality and influence’.
10. Research outputs
A submission will include the work of each
researcher. Each researcher will normally
be expected to submit four pieces of
research.
This will be examined by the panels to
indicate excellence.
11. Hefce definition of research
…original
investigation
undertaken in order to
gain knowledge and
understanding.
12. Research outputs
Panels will treat all research on an equal
footing measuring excellence in research
across the spectrum of applied research,
practice-based and basic/strategic
research, wherever that research is
conducted.
The panel is measuring the research, not
the place where the research was
disseminated.
13. Practice-based research
Practice based research is welcomed;
Practice-based research needs to be
research as defined by HEFCs;
Scholarly activity is not research
14. Impact
The REF will measure the impact of
research on the wider community.
Impact will involve case studies (at least
two but maybe more in larger institutions)
Impact studies can go back up to 12
years, involve the work in the university
and cannot be transferred with the
researcher.
15. Environment
This measures the sustainability, vitality
and influence of the unit of assessment
including:
Post graduate student success rate;
Support for research;
Research development;
Research income;
External influence.
16. Quality levels
Four star Quality that is world-leading in terms of originality,
significance and rigour.
Three star Quality that is internationally excellent in terms of
originality, significance and rigour but which nonetheless falls short of the
highest standards of excellence.
Two star Quality that is recognised internationally in terms of
originality, significance and rigour.
One star Quality that is recognised nationally in terms of originality,
significance and rigour.
Unclassified Quality that falls below the standard of nationally
recognised work. Or work which does not meet the published definition of
research for the purposes of this assessment.