Team 9
Merve Nur Tas
Tommi Veromaa
The journal discusses overcoming the challenge of increasing variety of products and lower
product lifecycle times in ramp-up process. It shows an approach of integrating technology
planning into production ramp-up management.The main problem presented is that
production planning and product usage is out of scale.
Challenges:
 Lack of scalability in production planning
 Investment allocation only to specific projects (not the whole production environment)
 Lack of sustainable planning because of not being able to evaluate cost-benefit-ratio
properly
Strategy:
 Controlling and evaluating investment capital (understanding how does the capital
materialize and generate value)
Source:http://jmt.wip.pw.edu.pl/index.php/JMT/article/view/41_2_3/63
16-Nov-17 2
This paper shows a sequential approach to ramp-up. Machines and production stations are the
main resources in a manufacturing system and production stations and machines can be in the
first instance, treated as independent ramp-up problems.
Challenges:
 Very fast pace of technology improvement
 Lack of systematic learning,
 Human overconfidence when applying changes
Strategies:
 Improvement of process understanding
 Systematic experiments during ramp-up phase to accumulate knowledge
 Sacrifice production output at the beginning to obtain better learning process
Source: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6702489
16-Nov-17 3
The paper presents a new approach for an automotive supplier to handle changes during ramp-
up phase.The method is roughly explained by dividing ramp-up of manufacturing into different
modules.This generic approach of scalable process design helps to make the manufacturing
more flexible and time-saving when it comes to ramping up new products as a supplier.
Challenges:
 Constantly decreasing product lifecycle,
 Modifications on product near delivery date, time and quantity of suppliers deliveries not
matching -> Suppliers are demanded to modify designs even after design freeze period, too
much automation reduces overall system flexibility.
Strategies:
 Assign ramp-up department to handle decreasing product lifecycles
 Communicate well the ramp-up plans with suppliers
 Reduce automation in very complex production sections that have a lot of different parameters.
Source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827114006969
16-Nov-17 4
This work investigates a symbiotic human–machine environment, which combines a formal
framework for capturing structured ramp-up experiences from expert production engineers
with a reinforcement learning method to formulate effective ramp-up policies.
Challenges:
 Inefficient communication
 Staff turnover
 Lack of transferable experience - results in multiple repetitions
Strategies:
 Human–machine collaboration
 Symbiotic human–machine learning
 The development of formal models and pattern recognition algorithms for ramp-up
16-Nov-17 5
Source: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7983421/
THE IMPACT OF PRODUCT COMPLEXITY ON RAMP-UP
PERFORMANCE
This study identifies the key product characteristics that affect ramp-up performance using
operational data from the cell phone industry.
Challenges:
 Product novelty
 Product design decisions: high levels of hardware complexity
 Sales forecast change (SFC): Management adjusts sales plans and sales forecasts during the
ramp-up preparation phase
Strategies:
 Managing effective capacity (1- lost capacity/planned allocated capacity) instead of final yield
 Deliberate product design decisions
Source: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ton_De_Kok/publication/265235097_The_Impact_of_Product_Complexity_on_Ramp-
Up_Performance/links/54912a4f0cf2d1800d87c886.pd
16-Nov-17 6
Unsuccessful
ramp-ups
Measurements Materials Personnel
Environment Methods Machines
Lack of sustainable planning
No measurements of cost-
benefit-ratio in investments
Lack of understanding
importance of learning
process
No systematic learning approach
Human overconfidence
Increasingly rapid decrease
in product lifecycles
Last minute changes
product designs
Last minute changes
in product designsSupplier non-flexibility
Supplier non-flexibility
Too much automatization in
complex sections
Staff Turnover
Inefficient communication
16-Nov-17 7
Intransferable Experience
Product Novelty
High level of hardware
complexity of the product
Sales Forecast
Change
High level of hardware
complexity of the product
16-Nov-17 8
Strategies/Ramp-up Categories
Product
/factory
Material
flow
Transport
system
Logistics
process
Supply
chain
Logistics
mana. /
control
Controlling and evaluating investment capital (understanding
how does the capital materialize and generate value)      
Improvement of process understanding      
Systematic experiments during ramp-up phase to accumulate
knowledge 
Sacrifice production output at the beginning to obtain better
learning process  
Assign ramp-up department to handle decreasing product
lifecycles      
Communicate well the ramp-up plans with suppliers   
Reduce automation in very complex production sections that
have a lot of different parameters. 
Human–machine collaboration      
Symbiotic human–machine learning   
The development of formal models and pattern recognition
algorithms for ramp-up 
Managing effective capacity instead of final yield 
Deliberate product design decisions 
 Nau, B., Burggraf, P., Klocke, F., & Kampker, A. (2017). Technology Planning and
Evaluation of Planning Processes During Product Ramp-Up. Journal of
Manufacturing Technologies, 41(2), 19-24.
 Doltsinis, S., Ferreira, P., & Lohse, N. (2014). An MDP model-based reinforcement
learning approach for production station ramp-up optimization: Q-learning
analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44(9), 1125-
1138.
 Basse, I., Sauer, A., & Schmitt, R. (2014). Scalable ramp-up of hybrid manufacturing
systems. Procedia CIRP, 20, 1-6.
 Doltsinis, S., Ferreira, P., & Lohse, N. (2017). A Symbiotic Human–Machine Learning
Approach for Production Ramp-up. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.
 Pufall, A., Fransoo, J. C., de Jong, A., & de Kok,T. (2012). The impact of product
complexity on ramp-up performance.Working paper, Beta publicatie, Eindhoven
University of Technology, Netherlands.
16-Nov-17 9
16-Nov-17 10

Ramp-up Challenges

  • 1.
    Team 9 Merve NurTas Tommi Veromaa
  • 2.
    The journal discussesovercoming the challenge of increasing variety of products and lower product lifecycle times in ramp-up process. It shows an approach of integrating technology planning into production ramp-up management.The main problem presented is that production planning and product usage is out of scale. Challenges:  Lack of scalability in production planning  Investment allocation only to specific projects (not the whole production environment)  Lack of sustainable planning because of not being able to evaluate cost-benefit-ratio properly Strategy:  Controlling and evaluating investment capital (understanding how does the capital materialize and generate value) Source:http://jmt.wip.pw.edu.pl/index.php/JMT/article/view/41_2_3/63 16-Nov-17 2
  • 3.
    This paper showsa sequential approach to ramp-up. Machines and production stations are the main resources in a manufacturing system and production stations and machines can be in the first instance, treated as independent ramp-up problems. Challenges:  Very fast pace of technology improvement  Lack of systematic learning,  Human overconfidence when applying changes Strategies:  Improvement of process understanding  Systematic experiments during ramp-up phase to accumulate knowledge  Sacrifice production output at the beginning to obtain better learning process Source: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6702489 16-Nov-17 3
  • 4.
    The paper presentsa new approach for an automotive supplier to handle changes during ramp- up phase.The method is roughly explained by dividing ramp-up of manufacturing into different modules.This generic approach of scalable process design helps to make the manufacturing more flexible and time-saving when it comes to ramping up new products as a supplier. Challenges:  Constantly decreasing product lifecycle,  Modifications on product near delivery date, time and quantity of suppliers deliveries not matching -> Suppliers are demanded to modify designs even after design freeze period, too much automation reduces overall system flexibility. Strategies:  Assign ramp-up department to handle decreasing product lifecycles  Communicate well the ramp-up plans with suppliers  Reduce automation in very complex production sections that have a lot of different parameters. Source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827114006969 16-Nov-17 4
  • 5.
    This work investigatesa symbiotic human–machine environment, which combines a formal framework for capturing structured ramp-up experiences from expert production engineers with a reinforcement learning method to formulate effective ramp-up policies. Challenges:  Inefficient communication  Staff turnover  Lack of transferable experience - results in multiple repetitions Strategies:  Human–machine collaboration  Symbiotic human–machine learning  The development of formal models and pattern recognition algorithms for ramp-up 16-Nov-17 5 Source: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7983421/
  • 6.
    THE IMPACT OFPRODUCT COMPLEXITY ON RAMP-UP PERFORMANCE This study identifies the key product characteristics that affect ramp-up performance using operational data from the cell phone industry. Challenges:  Product novelty  Product design decisions: high levels of hardware complexity  Sales forecast change (SFC): Management adjusts sales plans and sales forecasts during the ramp-up preparation phase Strategies:  Managing effective capacity (1- lost capacity/planned allocated capacity) instead of final yield  Deliberate product design decisions Source: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ton_De_Kok/publication/265235097_The_Impact_of_Product_Complexity_on_Ramp- Up_Performance/links/54912a4f0cf2d1800d87c886.pd 16-Nov-17 6
  • 7.
    Unsuccessful ramp-ups Measurements Materials Personnel EnvironmentMethods Machines Lack of sustainable planning No measurements of cost- benefit-ratio in investments Lack of understanding importance of learning process No systematic learning approach Human overconfidence Increasingly rapid decrease in product lifecycles Last minute changes product designs Last minute changes in product designsSupplier non-flexibility Supplier non-flexibility Too much automatization in complex sections Staff Turnover Inefficient communication 16-Nov-17 7 Intransferable Experience Product Novelty High level of hardware complexity of the product Sales Forecast Change High level of hardware complexity of the product
  • 8.
    16-Nov-17 8 Strategies/Ramp-up Categories Product /factory Material flow Transport system Logistics process Supply chain Logistics mana./ control Controlling and evaluating investment capital (understanding how does the capital materialize and generate value)       Improvement of process understanding       Systematic experiments during ramp-up phase to accumulate knowledge  Sacrifice production output at the beginning to obtain better learning process   Assign ramp-up department to handle decreasing product lifecycles       Communicate well the ramp-up plans with suppliers    Reduce automation in very complex production sections that have a lot of different parameters.  Human–machine collaboration       Symbiotic human–machine learning    The development of formal models and pattern recognition algorithms for ramp-up  Managing effective capacity instead of final yield  Deliberate product design decisions 
  • 9.
     Nau, B.,Burggraf, P., Klocke, F., & Kampker, A. (2017). Technology Planning and Evaluation of Planning Processes During Product Ramp-Up. Journal of Manufacturing Technologies, 41(2), 19-24.  Doltsinis, S., Ferreira, P., & Lohse, N. (2014). An MDP model-based reinforcement learning approach for production station ramp-up optimization: Q-learning analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44(9), 1125- 1138.  Basse, I., Sauer, A., & Schmitt, R. (2014). Scalable ramp-up of hybrid manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP, 20, 1-6.  Doltsinis, S., Ferreira, P., & Lohse, N. (2017). A Symbiotic Human–Machine Learning Approach for Production Ramp-up. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.  Pufall, A., Fransoo, J. C., de Jong, A., & de Kok,T. (2012). The impact of product complexity on ramp-up performance.Working paper, Beta publicatie, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands. 16-Nov-17 9
  • 10.