SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 16
E R I N P U R S I N G E R
C AY L E E R O S A
AL E X P F E I F F E R
B E N R O B E R T S
Race to the Top
“It's time to stop just talking about education reform and start actually
doing it.
It's time to make education America's national mission.”
– President Barack Obama, November 4, 2009
What is Race to the Top?
 A $4.35 billion United States Department of
Education contest created to spur innovation and
reforms in state and local district k-12 education.
 States are awarded points for satisfying certain
education policies such as
 Performance-based standards for teachers & principals
 Complying with Common Core standards
 Lifting caps on charter schools
 Turning around the lowest-performing schools
 Building data systems
What?
 Based on the points given out to states, is the
amount of funding the state receives.
 500 possible points
 In the 2010 results, earning 418/500 points, round 1
revealed that Ohio was a finalist for the upcoming
round 2.
 After round 2, earning 440/500 Ohio was awarded
$400 Million
When and Why?
 The program was announced on July 24, 2009
 Spur innovation and reform education systems
across America
How?
 The United States Department of Education
established it as part of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009
 Included in the 11.24% of
the act that focused on
education
Controversy
 Conservatives believe it imposes federal control on
state schools.
 Critics say the high-stakes test is unreliable
 Teachers Unions and educations also say the tests
are inaccurate and unreliable
Modifications
 Department of Education has made minor
adjustments to the program since 2009.
 Another Race to the Top program was offered for the
2013 school year.
 Aimed at Local Education Agencies (LEAs) as a
district competition.
Who?
 Race to the Top is administered by The United
States Department of Education.
 Funded by the Federal Government 100%
Administered at State/Local Level?
2009-2010 Competition
 Competition between states, points were awarded to
the state as a whole, as the winnings would be
awarded to the state as well
2013 Competition
 Administered at a district level, smaller total award
winnings, but given out to more districts
Money Distribution
 Money is distributed based on States’ scores and
how well they met the given criteria
 $4.35 Billion total is distributed among the winning
states
500 Point System
 To win the award money, the state must score high on
the 500 point system.
 In said system, there are 6 categories one must succeed
in
1. Great Teachers and Leaders (138 pts)
2. State Success Factors (125 pts)
3. Standards and Assessments (70 pts)
4. General Selection Criteria (55 pts)
5. Turning around the Lowest-Achieving Schools (50 pts)
6. Data Systems to Support Instruction (47 pts)
7. Prioritization of STEM (Science, Tech, Engineering,
Math) (15 pts)
Multiple Choice Questions
How much does the Race to the Top program cost?
a) $4 Million
b) $300 Million
c) Almost $1 Billion
d) $4.35 Billion
Multiple Choice Questions
How much money was Ohio awarded in the 2010
results of Race to the Top?
a) $10 Million
b) $100 Million
c) $400 Million
d) $4.35 Billion
Multiple Choice Questions
Who was president when Race to the Top was
established?
a) Bill Clinton
b) George W. Bush
c) Barack Obama
d) None of the above
Multiple Choice Questions
How many points are possible of obtaining in Race to
the Top?
a) 100 points
b) 500 points
c) 1,000 points
d) 5,000 points
Sources
 www.edweek.org/topics/racetotop/
 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_to_the_Top
 www.whitehouse.gov/issues/education/k-
12/racetothetop
 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_to_the_Top#Critcisms
 www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/index.html
 http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive
-summary.pdf

More Related Content

Similar to Race to the top

Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
WSU Cougars
 
Reform Alabama - Blueprint for Education Reform
Reform Alabama - Blueprint for Education ReformReform Alabama - Blueprint for Education Reform
Reform Alabama - Blueprint for Education Reform
bsc_admin
 
Florida School Acoountability
Florida School AcoountabilityFlorida School Acoountability
Florida School Acoountability
dannyleal13
 
20131118 Alger A Candid Look at Common Core
20131118 Alger A Candid Look at Common Core20131118 Alger A Candid Look at Common Core
20131118 Alger A Candid Look at Common Core
Vicki Alger
 
Survey Results and Report- Hawaii State High School College Counselors
Survey Results and Report- Hawaii State High School College CounselorsSurvey Results and Report- Hawaii State High School College Counselors
Survey Results and Report- Hawaii State High School College Counselors
Michael Weddington
 
School Choice
School ChoiceSchool Choice
School Choice
kleinbr
 

Similar to Race to the top (20)

Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
Pla Methdology 3 19 2010
 
ED543109
ED543109ED543109
ED543109
 
Levypr March 1
Levypr March 1Levypr March 1
Levypr March 1
 
ELC Exxon Mobile Case Competition Winner Emory University
ELC Exxon Mobile Case Competition Winner Emory UniversityELC Exxon Mobile Case Competition Winner Emory University
ELC Exxon Mobile Case Competition Winner Emory University
 
The Case For Action
The Case For ActionThe Case For Action
The Case For Action
 
Florida Parents Against Common Core (FPACC) Presentation(1)
Florida Parents Against Common Core (FPACC) Presentation(1)Florida Parents Against Common Core (FPACC) Presentation(1)
Florida Parents Against Common Core (FPACC) Presentation(1)
 
Race to the Top
Race to the TopRace to the Top
Race to the Top
 
Reform Alabama - Blueprint for Education Reform
Reform Alabama - Blueprint for Education ReformReform Alabama - Blueprint for Education Reform
Reform Alabama - Blueprint for Education Reform
 
US Federal Update 2012
US Federal Update 2012US Federal Update 2012
US Federal Update 2012
 
Florida School Acoountability
Florida School AcoountabilityFlorida School Acoountability
Florida School Acoountability
 
SMAI 2013 - Case for Market-Based Planning
SMAI 2013 - Case for Market-Based PlanningSMAI 2013 - Case for Market-Based Planning
SMAI 2013 - Case for Market-Based Planning
 
Columbia Klingenstein Masters Program July 2014
Columbia Klingenstein Masters Program July 2014 Columbia Klingenstein Masters Program July 2014
Columbia Klingenstein Masters Program July 2014
 
FPACC cc coercion_2013_fnl (1)
FPACC cc coercion_2013_fnl (1)FPACC cc coercion_2013_fnl (1)
FPACC cc coercion_2013_fnl (1)
 
Directory of CHEA Recognized Higher Education Accrediting Organizations
Directory of CHEA Recognized Higher Education Accrediting OrganizationsDirectory of CHEA Recognized Higher Education Accrediting Organizations
Directory of CHEA Recognized Higher Education Accrediting Organizations
 
20131118 Alger A Candid Look at Common Core
20131118 Alger A Candid Look at Common Core20131118 Alger A Candid Look at Common Core
20131118 Alger A Candid Look at Common Core
 
Fc100 july26
Fc100 july26Fc100 july26
Fc100 july26
 
Hunt Institute Multistate Overview
Hunt Institute Multistate OverviewHunt Institute Multistate Overview
Hunt Institute Multistate Overview
 
Reaching a Postsecondary Attainment Goal: A Multistate Overview
Reaching a Postsecondary Attainment Goal: A Multistate OverviewReaching a Postsecondary Attainment Goal: A Multistate Overview
Reaching a Postsecondary Attainment Goal: A Multistate Overview
 
Survey Results and Report- Hawaii State High School College Counselors
Survey Results and Report- Hawaii State High School College CounselorsSurvey Results and Report- Hawaii State High School College Counselors
Survey Results and Report- Hawaii State High School College Counselors
 
School Choice
School ChoiceSchool Choice
School Choice
 

Recently uploaded

會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
中 央社
 
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
中 央社
 
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code ExamplesSPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code Examples
Peter Brusilovsky
 
Transparency, Recognition and the role of eSealing - Ildiko Mazar and Koen No...
Transparency, Recognition and the role of eSealing - Ildiko Mazar and Koen No...Transparency, Recognition and the role of eSealing - Ildiko Mazar and Koen No...
Transparency, Recognition and the role of eSealing - Ildiko Mazar and Koen No...
EADTU
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of TransportBasic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
Basic Civil Engineering notes on Transportation Engineering & Modes of Transport
 
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptxGraduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English (v3).pptx
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Named Entity Recognition"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Named Entity Recognition"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Named Entity Recognition"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Named Entity Recognition"
 
會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文會考英文
 
OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...
OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...
OS-operating systems- ch05 (CPU Scheduling) ...
 
e-Sealing at EADTU by Kamakshi Rajagopal
e-Sealing at EADTU by Kamakshi Rajagopale-Sealing at EADTU by Kamakshi Rajagopal
e-Sealing at EADTU by Kamakshi Rajagopal
 
Book Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
Book Review of Run For Your Life PowerpointBook Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
Book Review of Run For Your Life Powerpoint
 
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptx
ANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptxANTI         PARKISON          DRUGS.pptx
ANTI PARKISON DRUGS.pptx
 
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & SystemsOSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
OSCM Unit 2_Operations Processes & Systems
 
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptxPSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
PSYPACT- Practicing Over State Lines May 2024.pptx
 
male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................male presentation...pdf.................
male presentation...pdf.................
 
When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...
When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...
When Quality Assurance Meets Innovation in Higher Education - Report launch w...
 
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinh
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinhĐề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinh
Đề tieng anh thpt 2024 danh cho cac ban hoc sinh
 
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.pptAIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
AIM of Education-Teachers Training-2024.ppt
 
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDFThe Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
The Story of Village Palampur Class 9 Free Study Material PDF
 
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjStl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Stl Algorithms in C++ jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
 
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽會考英聽
 
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code ExamplesSPLICE Working Group:Reusable Code Examples
SPLICE Working Group: Reusable Code Examples
 
Transparency, Recognition and the role of eSealing - Ildiko Mazar and Koen No...
Transparency, Recognition and the role of eSealing - Ildiko Mazar and Koen No...Transparency, Recognition and the role of eSealing - Ildiko Mazar and Koen No...
Transparency, Recognition and the role of eSealing - Ildiko Mazar and Koen No...
 
An overview of the various scriptures in Hinduism
An overview of the various scriptures in HinduismAn overview of the various scriptures in Hinduism
An overview of the various scriptures in Hinduism
 

Race to the top

  • 1. E R I N P U R S I N G E R C AY L E E R O S A AL E X P F E I F F E R B E N R O B E R T S Race to the Top “It's time to stop just talking about education reform and start actually doing it. It's time to make education America's national mission.” – President Barack Obama, November 4, 2009
  • 2. What is Race to the Top?  A $4.35 billion United States Department of Education contest created to spur innovation and reforms in state and local district k-12 education.  States are awarded points for satisfying certain education policies such as  Performance-based standards for teachers & principals  Complying with Common Core standards  Lifting caps on charter schools  Turning around the lowest-performing schools  Building data systems
  • 3. What?  Based on the points given out to states, is the amount of funding the state receives.  500 possible points  In the 2010 results, earning 418/500 points, round 1 revealed that Ohio was a finalist for the upcoming round 2.  After round 2, earning 440/500 Ohio was awarded $400 Million
  • 4. When and Why?  The program was announced on July 24, 2009  Spur innovation and reform education systems across America
  • 5. How?  The United States Department of Education established it as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009  Included in the 11.24% of the act that focused on education
  • 6. Controversy  Conservatives believe it imposes federal control on state schools.  Critics say the high-stakes test is unreliable  Teachers Unions and educations also say the tests are inaccurate and unreliable
  • 7. Modifications  Department of Education has made minor adjustments to the program since 2009.  Another Race to the Top program was offered for the 2013 school year.  Aimed at Local Education Agencies (LEAs) as a district competition.
  • 8. Who?  Race to the Top is administered by The United States Department of Education.  Funded by the Federal Government 100%
  • 9. Administered at State/Local Level? 2009-2010 Competition  Competition between states, points were awarded to the state as a whole, as the winnings would be awarded to the state as well 2013 Competition  Administered at a district level, smaller total award winnings, but given out to more districts
  • 10. Money Distribution  Money is distributed based on States’ scores and how well they met the given criteria  $4.35 Billion total is distributed among the winning states
  • 11. 500 Point System  To win the award money, the state must score high on the 500 point system.  In said system, there are 6 categories one must succeed in 1. Great Teachers and Leaders (138 pts) 2. State Success Factors (125 pts) 3. Standards and Assessments (70 pts) 4. General Selection Criteria (55 pts) 5. Turning around the Lowest-Achieving Schools (50 pts) 6. Data Systems to Support Instruction (47 pts) 7. Prioritization of STEM (Science, Tech, Engineering, Math) (15 pts)
  • 12. Multiple Choice Questions How much does the Race to the Top program cost? a) $4 Million b) $300 Million c) Almost $1 Billion d) $4.35 Billion
  • 13. Multiple Choice Questions How much money was Ohio awarded in the 2010 results of Race to the Top? a) $10 Million b) $100 Million c) $400 Million d) $4.35 Billion
  • 14. Multiple Choice Questions Who was president when Race to the Top was established? a) Bill Clinton b) George W. Bush c) Barack Obama d) None of the above
  • 15. Multiple Choice Questions How many points are possible of obtaining in Race to the Top? a) 100 points b) 500 points c) 1,000 points d) 5,000 points
  • 16. Sources  www.edweek.org/topics/racetotop/  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_to_the_Top  www.whitehouse.gov/issues/education/k- 12/racetothetop  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_to_the_Top#Critcisms  www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/index.html  http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive -summary.pdf