Cavitation-Induced
Fusion
Tomorrow’s Clean Energy
Fusion: Disruptive Innovation
 We have discovered a means for achieving micro-
thermonuclear fusion in vibrating gas bubbles in liquid
 Our discovery allows constructing inexpensive power
generators that run on deuterium
 Our technology will render fossil fuels obsolete
 Because our work parallels controversial “bubble
fusion” we go against “expert opinion”
What is Fusion?
 Hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium combine
forming helium and releasing massive amounts of
heat
 10 micrograms of deuterium = 1 barrel of oil (!!!)
Why Fusion?
 Everyone agrees that fusion energy (which powers the
sun) is the power of future
 Unlike chemical energy that comes from burning fossil
fuels fusion energy produces no emissions
 Unlike conventional nuclear power fusion does not
produce radioactive waste
 Unlike wind or solar power fusion energy does not
require massive installations and is virtually free
(deuterium is cheap and we need minuscule
quantities)
Where is Fusion?
 Government has spent billions and decades of
research on fusion projects involving giant magnets
(magnetic confinement) and powerful lasers (inertial
confinement)
 These fusion mega-projects are unsuccessful but “too-
big-to-fail”, so funding continues
 Proponents of fusion mega-projects are threatened by
“cold” fusion and “bubble fusion” and therefore will
thrash any competing idea
Novel Idea: Cavitation
 Cavitation is a natural process that results in formation
of bubbles in liquid
 Cavitation bubbles expand and collapse violently
releasing tremendous energy that easily eats through
thick metal parts in pumps and turbines
Cavitation-Induced Fusion (CIF)
 Theoretical calculations show that under the right
conditions gas within cavitation bubbles can heat up to
fusion temperatures (millions degrees Celsius)!
 Seven different groups in U.S. and Russia have
conducted successful experiments demonstrating CIF
 Unfortunately, widely publicized work by Taleyarkhan
(Purdue), ended in scandal with lasting damage to the
field
“Bubblegate” Scandal
 Critical account is given by Krivit (New Energy Times)
 Politics, academic rivalry, and clashes with special
interest groups killed otherwise promising field of
research
 As a result Taleyarkhan was
debarred from federal funding and
Purdue lost majority of it’s nuclear
engineering faculty
 The science, however, remains
Lipson et al. (USSR)
Bityurin et al. (Russia)
Smorodov (Russia)
Taleyarkhan (USA)
CIF Science
 Conventional textbook physics (NOT cold fusion)
 Solid theoretical foundation (dozens of papers)
 4 independent successful experiments in USA,
and 3 in Russia (Russian work is not known in
the US)
 Yet due to the “bubblegate” scandal the results
are not universally accepted (skewed
perception)
Our Accomplishments
 Analytical model in MatLab and Mathematica
 Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation
software
 Three experiments
 Preliminary results
 Prototype generator hardware
Necessary Conditions
 Supersonic collapse
Happens in nature, gives rise to sonoluminescence
 Spherical collapse
Happens in nature, gives rise to sonoluminescence
High surface tension liquids are best
 Low vapor pressure / high accommodation
There are suitable liquids: liquid metals, heat
transfer fluids are best
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Single-Bubble Experiment
Multi-Bubble Experiment
Prototype Generator Hardware
Fusion Power Plant
Aside from the reactor, this is a completely standard power plant design
Our Results
 Analytical model and MD simulation predicts
fusion
 Neutrons were detected in three experiments
 Commercial generator prototype designed
 Careful experimentation required to validate
our model and refine it into an engineering
tool
Immediate Goals: 2013
 Demonstrate CIF proof of commercial concept
 Detailed experimental plan is in place; will test best options first
 May require up to 12 months to test all feasible options
 Outcome = repeatable on-demand fusion
 File global patents
 Engage industry and academia in technology validation
 We will publish our results in peer-reviewed journals
 We will engage AECOM (world’s largest engineering firm) and Pennsylvania State
University to validate the results
 Develop modeling software for CIF engineering to facilitate next stage (net
energy production)
 Minimum capital requirement: $562k USD
Roadmap beyond 2013
 2014
 Process control demonstration
 Net energy demonstration
 2015 – 50 kW commercial generator prototype,
technology license agreements, IPO
 Capital required to IPO stage may be up to $50
million, but with proof of commercial concept in hand
finding further investors will be easy
 2016 – 50 MW commercial generator
Commercial Viability
 We estimate that 1 liter of carrier liquid saturated
with fusion bubbles will produce at least 10kW of
power
 Power output scales with volume
 Power output exponentially depends on
temperature: tenfold temperature increase results
in 50,000 increase in output power!
 Therefore minute process improvement will result
in huge power output boost (no diminishing
returns)
CIF Commercial Potential
 CIF is inherently safe
 No radioactivity, no possibility of meltdown or explosion, no hazardous waste, no
fear of weapons proliferation, no carbon emissions or pollutants
 CIF is the ONLY new energy source that can compete against fossil fuels and
win:
 Wind, solar and biomass can never replace fossil fuels due to costs and intermittency
 CIF can be used for residential, industrial process heating, and power generation
 CIF power plant requires none of the safeguards of existing nuclear plants
 CIF can scale from a few MW (e.g. compounds, neighborhoods) to thousands of
MW (grid power)
 CIF can replace oil, coal and natural gas in virtually all stationary
applications
 Did we mention desalination? Fusion will provide free unlimited fresh water.
The Company
 Quantum Fusion, Inc. is wholly owned by Quantum
Potential Corporation
 Location: Penn State Innovation Park
 Employees: 5 (including part time)
 State of the art equipment
 Office, lab, industrial space
Our Advantage
 Prior work relies on D-D fusion. We will use D-T fusion as it
gives 1,000 times higher reaction rate.
 Prior work relies on cavitation to create random bubbles,
which is difficult and hard to control. We will inject
engineered bubbles instead.
 Prior work relies on high pressure (40-1,000 bars). We have
engineered our bubble content (light and heavy gas
mixture) to create strong shock that will produce fusion at
just ~2 bars of pressure.
 Prior work relies on acoustic cavitation, which is inefficient.
We will use hydrodynamic cavitation in our commercial unit.
Technical Risks
 The only foreseeable risk is in single-bubble fusion. Is it
repeatable? Can we control it? We will eliminate this risk in
2012.
 The rest of the hardware for commercial generator is
essentially designed and requires only ordinary engineering.
 Other technical risks may include inability to control fusion yield
beyond break-even point for reasons we currently cannot think
of. We will tackle this issue in 2013.
Fusion Benefits for the USA
 Smooth transition away from fossil fuels
 Renewed technological leadership
 Birth of an entire new industry = employment!
 Markedly reduced energy and transportation costs =
cheaper goods and services, hence
 Higher consumer spending, GDP & tax revenue
growth, reduced deficit
Fusion Benefits for the World
 Markedly reduced energy and transportation costs =
sharp improvement in living standards, hence
 More middle class (and larger markets!)
 Cheap desalination will solve food and water
shortages, deserts will become oases
 Reduced emissions of all types
 A new age of prosperity for all of humanity
Invest in the Future
“It is not because things are difficult we do not dare, it is
because we do not dare that they are difficult.” –
Seneca
Contact
Dr. Max Fomitchev-Zamilov, President
200 Innovation Blvd, Suite 254, State College, PA 16803
max@quantum-potential.com | 814-777-8993
www.quantum-fusion.com

Qfi investment summary

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Fusion: Disruptive Innovation We have discovered a means for achieving micro- thermonuclear fusion in vibrating gas bubbles in liquid  Our discovery allows constructing inexpensive power generators that run on deuterium  Our technology will render fossil fuels obsolete  Because our work parallels controversial “bubble fusion” we go against “expert opinion”
  • 3.
    What is Fusion? Hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium combine forming helium and releasing massive amounts of heat  10 micrograms of deuterium = 1 barrel of oil (!!!)
  • 4.
    Why Fusion?  Everyoneagrees that fusion energy (which powers the sun) is the power of future  Unlike chemical energy that comes from burning fossil fuels fusion energy produces no emissions  Unlike conventional nuclear power fusion does not produce radioactive waste  Unlike wind or solar power fusion energy does not require massive installations and is virtually free (deuterium is cheap and we need minuscule quantities)
  • 5.
    Where is Fusion? Government has spent billions and decades of research on fusion projects involving giant magnets (magnetic confinement) and powerful lasers (inertial confinement)  These fusion mega-projects are unsuccessful but “too- big-to-fail”, so funding continues  Proponents of fusion mega-projects are threatened by “cold” fusion and “bubble fusion” and therefore will thrash any competing idea
  • 6.
    Novel Idea: Cavitation Cavitation is a natural process that results in formation of bubbles in liquid  Cavitation bubbles expand and collapse violently releasing tremendous energy that easily eats through thick metal parts in pumps and turbines
  • 7.
    Cavitation-Induced Fusion (CIF) Theoretical calculations show that under the right conditions gas within cavitation bubbles can heat up to fusion temperatures (millions degrees Celsius)!  Seven different groups in U.S. and Russia have conducted successful experiments demonstrating CIF  Unfortunately, widely publicized work by Taleyarkhan (Purdue), ended in scandal with lasting damage to the field
  • 8.
    “Bubblegate” Scandal  Criticalaccount is given by Krivit (New Energy Times)  Politics, academic rivalry, and clashes with special interest groups killed otherwise promising field of research  As a result Taleyarkhan was debarred from federal funding and Purdue lost majority of it’s nuclear engineering faculty  The science, however, remains
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
    CIF Science  Conventionaltextbook physics (NOT cold fusion)  Solid theoretical foundation (dozens of papers)  4 independent successful experiments in USA, and 3 in Russia (Russian work is not known in the US)  Yet due to the “bubblegate” scandal the results are not universally accepted (skewed perception)
  • 14.
    Our Accomplishments  Analyticalmodel in MatLab and Mathematica  Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation software  Three experiments  Preliminary results  Prototype generator hardware
  • 15.
    Necessary Conditions  Supersoniccollapse Happens in nature, gives rise to sonoluminescence  Spherical collapse Happens in nature, gives rise to sonoluminescence High surface tension liquids are best  Low vapor pressure / high accommodation There are suitable liquids: liquid metals, heat transfer fluids are best
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Fusion Power Plant Asidefrom the reactor, this is a completely standard power plant design
  • 21.
    Our Results  Analyticalmodel and MD simulation predicts fusion  Neutrons were detected in three experiments  Commercial generator prototype designed  Careful experimentation required to validate our model and refine it into an engineering tool
  • 22.
    Immediate Goals: 2013 Demonstrate CIF proof of commercial concept  Detailed experimental plan is in place; will test best options first  May require up to 12 months to test all feasible options  Outcome = repeatable on-demand fusion  File global patents  Engage industry and academia in technology validation  We will publish our results in peer-reviewed journals  We will engage AECOM (world’s largest engineering firm) and Pennsylvania State University to validate the results  Develop modeling software for CIF engineering to facilitate next stage (net energy production)  Minimum capital requirement: $562k USD
  • 23.
    Roadmap beyond 2013 2014  Process control demonstration  Net energy demonstration  2015 – 50 kW commercial generator prototype, technology license agreements, IPO  Capital required to IPO stage may be up to $50 million, but with proof of commercial concept in hand finding further investors will be easy  2016 – 50 MW commercial generator
  • 24.
    Commercial Viability  Weestimate that 1 liter of carrier liquid saturated with fusion bubbles will produce at least 10kW of power  Power output scales with volume  Power output exponentially depends on temperature: tenfold temperature increase results in 50,000 increase in output power!  Therefore minute process improvement will result in huge power output boost (no diminishing returns)
  • 25.
    CIF Commercial Potential CIF is inherently safe  No radioactivity, no possibility of meltdown or explosion, no hazardous waste, no fear of weapons proliferation, no carbon emissions or pollutants  CIF is the ONLY new energy source that can compete against fossil fuels and win:  Wind, solar and biomass can never replace fossil fuels due to costs and intermittency  CIF can be used for residential, industrial process heating, and power generation  CIF power plant requires none of the safeguards of existing nuclear plants  CIF can scale from a few MW (e.g. compounds, neighborhoods) to thousands of MW (grid power)  CIF can replace oil, coal and natural gas in virtually all stationary applications  Did we mention desalination? Fusion will provide free unlimited fresh water.
  • 26.
    The Company  QuantumFusion, Inc. is wholly owned by Quantum Potential Corporation  Location: Penn State Innovation Park  Employees: 5 (including part time)  State of the art equipment  Office, lab, industrial space
  • 27.
    Our Advantage  Priorwork relies on D-D fusion. We will use D-T fusion as it gives 1,000 times higher reaction rate.  Prior work relies on cavitation to create random bubbles, which is difficult and hard to control. We will inject engineered bubbles instead.  Prior work relies on high pressure (40-1,000 bars). We have engineered our bubble content (light and heavy gas mixture) to create strong shock that will produce fusion at just ~2 bars of pressure.  Prior work relies on acoustic cavitation, which is inefficient. We will use hydrodynamic cavitation in our commercial unit.
  • 28.
    Technical Risks  Theonly foreseeable risk is in single-bubble fusion. Is it repeatable? Can we control it? We will eliminate this risk in 2012.  The rest of the hardware for commercial generator is essentially designed and requires only ordinary engineering.  Other technical risks may include inability to control fusion yield beyond break-even point for reasons we currently cannot think of. We will tackle this issue in 2013.
  • 29.
    Fusion Benefits forthe USA  Smooth transition away from fossil fuels  Renewed technological leadership  Birth of an entire new industry = employment!  Markedly reduced energy and transportation costs = cheaper goods and services, hence  Higher consumer spending, GDP & tax revenue growth, reduced deficit
  • 30.
    Fusion Benefits forthe World  Markedly reduced energy and transportation costs = sharp improvement in living standards, hence  More middle class (and larger markets!)  Cheap desalination will solve food and water shortages, deserts will become oases  Reduced emissions of all types  A new age of prosperity for all of humanity
  • 31.
    Invest in theFuture “It is not because things are difficult we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.” – Seneca Contact Dr. Max Fomitchev-Zamilov, President 200 Innovation Blvd, Suite 254, State College, PA 16803 max@quantum-potential.com | 814-777-8993 www.quantum-fusion.com

Editor's Notes

  • #2 Talk about myself
  • #3 Good, talk about literature; fusion as opposed to fission, combining elements
  • #4 This what most people think of fusion, traditional; show water molecules
  • #5 Good, talk about literature; fusion as opposed to fission, combining elements
  • #6 Good, talk about literature; fusion as opposed to fission, combining elements