The document discusses strategies for managing supply chain risk. It begins by noting that companies often underestimate the risks in their supply chains and where those risks may occur. It then advocates taking a comprehensive view of all potential risks across different cost categories. The document also recommends improving supply chain visibility through tools like barcodes and RFID tags. Finally, it suggests selectively shortening supply chains by bringing some production closer to key markets while still taking advantage of lower costs in other regions.
Throughout this presentation, you’ll learn:
General risks faced by banking institutions on the financial markets.
How the main banking regulatory bodies’ actions are framing the banking industry (FRTB, TLAC, etc.).
About the application of Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) as portfolio risk measures.
Complementary techniques to VaR and ES: Sensitivity Analysis (Greeks), Stress-testing.
Link between VaR & ES and regulatory capital.
Application of Extreme Value Theory to Risk Capital Estimationdrstevenmorrison
This document summarizes a presentation on applying extreme value theory to estimate risk capital requirements. The presentation discusses how simulation-based capital estimates are uncertain due to random number seed selection. It then demonstrates how extreme value theory can provide a more robust estimate of value-at-risk by fitting a generalized Pareto distribution to simulation outputs above a threshold. This allows the statistical uncertainty of capital estimates to be quantified and reduces sensitivity to random number selection compared to empirical quantile methods. The presentation concludes that extreme value theory is a useful technique for simulation-based risk and capital modeling.
This document discusses volatility controlled investing strategies for defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans. It begins with an overview of the challenges pension plans face in generating returns while managing downside risk. It then provides examples of how volatility control strategies work by varying equity market exposure in response to changing volatility levels. Key benefits of volatility control for pension plans include downside protection, lower costs compared to other protection strategies, and better risk-adjusted returns than passive equity exposure. The document also addresses common questions about volatility control and provides references for further reading.
This document discusses Value at Risk (VaR) and related concepts over multiple learning outcomes (LOs). It introduces VaR and explains why it was widely adopted as a risk measure. It also defines how to calculate VaR for single and multiple assets, and how to convert between time periods. The document discusses assumptions of VaR calculations and reasons for using continuously compounded returns. It also addresses factors that affect portfolio risk and how to calculate VaR for linear and non-linear derivatives. Finally, it introduces cash flow at risk (CFaR) and how VaR and CFaR can be used to evaluate projects and allocate risk.
Value at Risk (VaR) is a statistical technique used to measure potential portfolio losses over a specified time period and confidence level. It was originally used to measure market risk but has been extended to other risk types like credit and operational risk. VaR calculates the maximum dollar amount a portfolio could lose with a given level of confidence, usually 95%. Lower correlations between assets in a portfolio reduce overall risk. VaR is computed using weights, volatilities, and correlations of assets in a portfolio along with the confidence level and time horizon.
Value at Risk (VaR) is a risk measurement technique used to estimate potential losses that could occur from market risk over a specified time period. The document discusses the need for VaR, how it is defined and calculated using historical simulation, its uses, strengths and weaknesses. It emphasizes that VaR should not be used alone and other risk measures like tail measures and stress testing are also important.
These Lecture series are relating the use R language software, its interface and functions required to evaluate financial risk models. Furthermore, R software applications relating financial market data, measuring risk, modern portfolio theory, risk modeling relating returns generalized hyperbolic and lambda distributions, Value at Risk (VaR) modelling, extreme value methods and models, the class of ARCH models, GARCH risk models and portfolio optimization approaches.
Value at Risk (VAR) summarizes the worst potential loss over a target period at a given confidence level, accounting for risks across an institution. VAR is calculated using statistical techniques to estimate losses that may occur but are unlikely to be exceeded. It is used to measure market, credit, operational and enterprise-wide risk and determine capital requirements to withstand unexpected losses.
Throughout this presentation, you’ll learn:
General risks faced by banking institutions on the financial markets.
How the main banking regulatory bodies’ actions are framing the banking industry (FRTB, TLAC, etc.).
About the application of Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) as portfolio risk measures.
Complementary techniques to VaR and ES: Sensitivity Analysis (Greeks), Stress-testing.
Link between VaR & ES and regulatory capital.
Application of Extreme Value Theory to Risk Capital Estimationdrstevenmorrison
This document summarizes a presentation on applying extreme value theory to estimate risk capital requirements. The presentation discusses how simulation-based capital estimates are uncertain due to random number seed selection. It then demonstrates how extreme value theory can provide a more robust estimate of value-at-risk by fitting a generalized Pareto distribution to simulation outputs above a threshold. This allows the statistical uncertainty of capital estimates to be quantified and reduces sensitivity to random number selection compared to empirical quantile methods. The presentation concludes that extreme value theory is a useful technique for simulation-based risk and capital modeling.
This document discusses volatility controlled investing strategies for defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans. It begins with an overview of the challenges pension plans face in generating returns while managing downside risk. It then provides examples of how volatility control strategies work by varying equity market exposure in response to changing volatility levels. Key benefits of volatility control for pension plans include downside protection, lower costs compared to other protection strategies, and better risk-adjusted returns than passive equity exposure. The document also addresses common questions about volatility control and provides references for further reading.
This document discusses Value at Risk (VaR) and related concepts over multiple learning outcomes (LOs). It introduces VaR and explains why it was widely adopted as a risk measure. It also defines how to calculate VaR for single and multiple assets, and how to convert between time periods. The document discusses assumptions of VaR calculations and reasons for using continuously compounded returns. It also addresses factors that affect portfolio risk and how to calculate VaR for linear and non-linear derivatives. Finally, it introduces cash flow at risk (CFaR) and how VaR and CFaR can be used to evaluate projects and allocate risk.
Value at Risk (VaR) is a statistical technique used to measure potential portfolio losses over a specified time period and confidence level. It was originally used to measure market risk but has been extended to other risk types like credit and operational risk. VaR calculates the maximum dollar amount a portfolio could lose with a given level of confidence, usually 95%. Lower correlations between assets in a portfolio reduce overall risk. VaR is computed using weights, volatilities, and correlations of assets in a portfolio along with the confidence level and time horizon.
Value at Risk (VaR) is a risk measurement technique used to estimate potential losses that could occur from market risk over a specified time period. The document discusses the need for VaR, how it is defined and calculated using historical simulation, its uses, strengths and weaknesses. It emphasizes that VaR should not be used alone and other risk measures like tail measures and stress testing are also important.
These Lecture series are relating the use R language software, its interface and functions required to evaluate financial risk models. Furthermore, R software applications relating financial market data, measuring risk, modern portfolio theory, risk modeling relating returns generalized hyperbolic and lambda distributions, Value at Risk (VaR) modelling, extreme value methods and models, the class of ARCH models, GARCH risk models and portfolio optimization approaches.
Value at Risk (VAR) summarizes the worst potential loss over a target period at a given confidence level, accounting for risks across an institution. VAR is calculated using statistical techniques to estimate losses that may occur but are unlikely to be exceeded. It is used to measure market, credit, operational and enterprise-wide risk and determine capital requirements to withstand unexpected losses.
Original article from the Flevy business blog can be found here:
http://flevy.com/blog/building-resilience-into-supply-chains/
The supply chains of most companies, large and small, exploit a world of opportunities. But, increasing global exposure comes with an increasing range of risks. These companies’ complex networks of suppliers and customers are as diverse as the goods and resources they manage. Within the same supply chain, giant multinational companies can sit side-by side with small to medium enterprises (SMEs). Yet, among companies large and small, there is growing awareness that extreme weather and a changing climate pose new risks and opportunities to old ways of doing business.
Smart businesses know how to manage uncertainty. As their exposure to extreme weather increases, informed businesses are incorporating the risk of extreme weather into existing risk management. Meanwhile, business continuity planning is growing to embrace the need to think about how a changing climate impacts on business.
Worldwide companies are increasingly aware that their supply chains are exposed to greater weather extremes. International competition and cheap transportation have led to expansive supply chains linked by complex logistics, multiplying risks to business continuity. The Business Continuity Institute’s latest Horizon Scanning Survey, with results from 700 organizations in 62 countries, found 53% of the survey respondents were either ‘extremely concerned’ or ‘concerned’ about the impacts of adverse weather on their businesses (BCI 2013). Business leaders are now urging companies to think about climate change (Business Green, 2013).
This document discusses risk management strategies for outsourcing at AMD Nasik. It provides contact information for three managers involved in outsourcing. The abstract indicates it will discuss risk management case studies from AMD Nasik's outsourcing activities for the SU30 project over 7-8 years. Keywords include outsourcing, packages, educating suppliers, and parallel suppliers. The document then outlines AMD Nasik's risk management process and provides examples of retendering when initial quotes are too low and placing purchase orders with multiple suppliers for the same part.
Supply Chain Risk Strategies for Emerging Markets by Brittain LaddBrittain Ladd
This document discusses supply chain risk strategies for companies operating in emerging markets. It notes that while emerging markets offer growth opportunities, they also present significant risks that companies need to manage. The document outlines various types of supply chain risks, such as macroeconomic risks, risks from partners and internal operations. It emphasizes that companies should take a holistic approach to assessing risks across their entire supply chains and implement resilience strategies to mitigate vulnerabilities. Managing supply chain risk is particularly important in emerging markets due to factors like unclear regulations and infrastructure challenges.
This document discusses strategies for reducing supply chain risk while limiting the impact on cost efficiency. It presents two main strategies: 1) segmenting the supply chain by sourcing different products from multiple locations, as clothing retailer Zara does, and 2) regionalizing the supply chain by establishing regional production and distribution networks rather than global ones. These strategies help contain disruptions to part of the supply chain rather than allowing impacts to spread globally. The document also discusses leveraging existing IT systems to enable faster response to disruptions when they occur.
How AGCO implemented an Supply Chain Risk management solution to save millionsHeiko Schwarz
1) AGCO, a global manufacturer of agricultural machinery, implemented a supply chain risk management (SCRM) solution from riskmethods to address risks from their global supply base.
2) Their previous fragmented approach led to inefficiencies when disruptions occurred, so they centralized procurement and appointed a risk manager.
3) The riskmethods solution provided automated risk monitoring and visibility across AGCO's top 250 suppliers.
4) AGCO estimated millions in cost savings from avoided disruptions, improved sourcing decisions, and automation of manual risk processes.
SUPPLY CHAIN FINANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENTIgor Zax (Zaks)
Igor Zax, Managing Director of Tenzor Ltd., published a special report, Supply Chain Finance in the Context of Working Capital Management .
The report, published in conjunction with BCR Publishing, covers industry structure, risk management, financing and operational aspects, the way companies viewed the product, as well as trade offs between dynamic discounting and supply chain finance products.
In all of its forms, risk management is rapidly growing in importance within the commodity asset class. It will only become even more critical and complex in the future. Driven by unprecedented levels of change in the industry ranging from geopolitics to carbon, effective risk management is shifting for many commodity firms from just another activity to be managed to a critical component of business strategy that helps drive and inform brand, gain financing and trust, and demonstrates proper controls.
The COVID-19 pandemic is having a major financial and operational impact on the industrial manufacturing sector. Many manufacturing jobs cannot be done remotely, and slowed economic activity has reduced demand for industrial products globally. Plant closures and layoffs have already occurred as manufacturers struggle with declining revenues and demand. The crisis has also disrupted global supply chains. Manufacturers face continued pressure and uncertainty as the duration of the pandemic is unknown. They must take steps to ensure workforce safety, financial stability, and supply chain resilience to prepare for a prolonged recovery period.
Study ROI of Supply Chain Risk Management (riskmethods Nov 2014)Heiko Schwarz
“ROI of Supply Chain Risk Management” The study provides detailed information on which individual potentials - that can be evaluated in monetary terms - provide the source for calculating ROI of SCRM. Learn more download the brand new study about SCRM!
Welcome to this Autumn 2015 edition of Inperspective, Aon UK’s
review of the risk and insurance issues facing the retail and
wholesale industries. In this edition we focus on the steps risk
managers are taking to plan for one of the busiest consumer
spending periods in history.
This document provides five tips for maintaining an effective supply chain during a financial crisis:
1. Communicate regularly with Electronic Manufacturing Services providers to agree on demand forecasts and avoid overcorrecting supply levels.
2. Reduce lead times in ERP systems to reflect supply realities and reduced material exposure with contracting markets.
3. Validate the financial viability of critical suppliers and their major customers to understand risks.
4. Build long-term relationships with suppliers to ensure flexibility and support during downturns and subsequent upturns.
5. Do not ignore reduced sales forecasts - the downturn is real, inventory is a liability, and cash is critical for survival.
Supplier financial stability and risk differentiation in turbulent times -sup...Thomas Tanel
There is a Darwinian effect occurring in the supply chain as Fortune 1000 companies cut weaker suppliers. The simple fact is that in today’s longer global supply chains, product
moves over greater distances and across more multinational borders than in the more localized supply chains of the past. In an era of wildly fluctuating commodity prices and security regulations, the coordination and execution required for international shipments has become
more of a challenge than in the past.
Digitalization as Means to Overcome Supply Chain Disruptions.pdfTuan Le Anh
This document is a summary of part one of a three-part e-book series on digitalization trends for 2022. It discusses how digitalization can help companies overcome major supply chain disruptions through increased visibility, risk management, and responsiveness. Modern technologies like AI and cloud-based platforms are transforming supply chains by enabling real-time monitoring and analytics. Digital tools for data exchange and document management can streamline processes and optimize decision making. Adopting the right digital solutions is key for businesses to build resilience against ongoing disruptions and gain a competitive advantage.
1. Managing risk in global supply chains involves implementing strategies to manage everyday and exceptional risks across the supply chain through continuous risk assessment to reduce vulnerability and ensure continuity.
2. As companies outsource production globally to reduce costs, they introduce new risks related to culture, distance, time zones, and differing priorities between entities in the supply chain.
3. Managing a global supply chain requires understanding the cultural and operational dynamics in each location, as even neighboring countries can have important differences in risk tolerance, traditions, saving habits, and focus on quick versus sustained results. Failing to account for these differences can lead to disappointments and increased costs.
Complexity in business arises from the diversity of markets, customers, products, processes, components (parts or materials) and suppliers that a company chooses to deal with. Most managers recognise that complexity
comes at a cost - both in activities and overhead. But to be competitive, it is important to understand where and how the market rewards differentiation, and to root out all complexity that cannot be justified.
Complexity can hinder the performance of supply chains and the proliferation of products can lead to excessive set-ups and costs during manufacture.
Errors in forecasting can be magnified which may increase the chance of stock-outs and drive up the costs of distribution. But the answer is not to simply cull products indiscriminately from the range. Companies need to
balance the costs of complexity with how the market values variety.
Many low-volume products lose money after the associated costs of complexity are accounted for. And some products thought to be adding complexity are
quite profitable, because they generate high margins. It may appear tempting just to eliminate ‘the tail’ of the portfolio of products. But the answer lies in understanding the inter-dependencies within the portfolio and pinpointing the trade-offs between the requirements of the market, revenues, costs, and stakeholders' ambitions for growth. People from Marketing, Sales, Development, Supply Chain and Manufacturing have different perspectives on
what needs to be done. Only by collaborating can complexity be reduced and contained.
The major forces driving globalization include advancements in technology and communication networks that facilitate the flow of goods, services, and ideas worldwide; reductions in trade barriers by governments seeking to promote free trade and economic growth; and increasing consumer demand globally for a wide variety of products as standards of living rise.
Monitoring of latent risks and an early warning system for events enable prompt implementation of appropriate preventive measures in a crisis situation. These predefined actions, together with quicker crisis response time and assessment of the criticality can save costs and time. Read more about the step-by-step approach, and conceptual and organizational implementation of risk identification!
40 Rotman Magazine Spring 2007The vast majority of today.docxtamicawaysmith
40 / Rotman Magazine Spring 2007
The vast majority of today’s business decisions
are made with incomplete information and in the face of an uncer-
tain future. Indeed, with the exception of a reasonable expectation
that the sun will come up tomorrow, few things in human affairs can
be predicted with certainty. The term ‘risk management’ has come
to serve as a set phrase in the financial services industry, referring
to a formal process for evaluating and controlling a company’s total
exposure to loss together with estimates of the probability of loss.
However, this term deserves to be reclaimed to a broader usage, as
all companies have to deal with risk.
While risk can never be completely avoided, well-trained man-
agers have many ways to take uncertainty into account in their
strategy planning. Successful long-term planning includes a combi-
nation of the following six techniques.
1. Risk Identification
In most business situations it is remarkably easy to identify the
risks that a firm is facing by simply asking, “What could go wrong?”
For example, if a product depends on components, the inability of
a supplier to ship parts when needed is a risk that can be readily
anticipated. Where a firm is attempting to develop a new technol-
ogy, its research and development efforts will be successful in
achieving desired performance – or not.
This is not to say that all risks can be foreseen. Former U.S.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld famously observed that
there are both ‘known unknowns’ and ‘unknown unknowns.’ In a
military situation, he meant that an army might know that its
adversary had troops over the horizon, but not exactly how many (a
‘known unknown’); and there might be some uncertainty as to
whether the enemy had certain types of weapons (again, a known
unknown). However, his dictum was meant to alert planners that,
for all the variables that they could list and worry about, there
would always be some others that could not have been anticipated
(the ‘unknown unknowns’).
It is hard to describe an ‘unknown unknown’ in business, simply
because it is just that – unknown. However, an example would be
A Primer on the
Management of
Risk and Uncertainty
By David Robinson
Effective risk management depends on a clear understanding of
what a firm can control and what factors are beyond its control.
Using a combination of the techniques described here can go a long
way to effective strategic planning in the face of risk.
Strategy
Near Misses
Plan
ROT045
This document is authorized for use only by Familia Herring in Strategy at Strayer University, 2018.
Rotman Magazine Spring 2007 / 41
something like the emergence of a completely new technology, such
as the advent of transistors in electronics. The efficiency and minia-
turization offered by these solid-state devices could not have been
predicted from the existing development work on thermionic valves.
How can business leaders plan for the unknown unknown? At
the extreme, t ...
This report summarizes the findings of a study on managing risk in the global supply chain. The study surveyed 150 supply chain executives and conducted interviews. It found that while disruptions can significantly impact business performance, most companies do little to formally manage supply chain risk. They do not use outside expertise or quantify risks. On average, only 25% of supply chains are assessed for risk. The report provides recommendations for identifying, prioritizing and mitigating risks through measures like strong suppliers, visibility, insurance, and having backup plans.
This document discusses managing risk in the supply chain. It begins by explaining how today's marketplace is characterized by more turbulence and uncertainty, making supply chains more vulnerable. It then discusses understanding an organization's supply chain risk profile by identifying key drivers, critical infrastructure, vulnerabilities, modeling scenarios, developing risk mitigation responses, and monitoring the risk environment. The document provides examples and outlines a seven stage process for managing supply chain risk that includes understanding the entire supply chain, identifying risks, assessing impacts, prioritizing risks, developing strategies, implementing actions, and monitoring/reviewing. Overall, it stresses the importance of organizations developing programs to mitigate supply chain risks.
Original article from the Flevy business blog can be found here:
http://flevy.com/blog/building-resilience-into-supply-chains/
The supply chains of most companies, large and small, exploit a world of opportunities. But, increasing global exposure comes with an increasing range of risks. These companies’ complex networks of suppliers and customers are as diverse as the goods and resources they manage. Within the same supply chain, giant multinational companies can sit side-by side with small to medium enterprises (SMEs). Yet, among companies large and small, there is growing awareness that extreme weather and a changing climate pose new risks and opportunities to old ways of doing business.
Smart businesses know how to manage uncertainty. As their exposure to extreme weather increases, informed businesses are incorporating the risk of extreme weather into existing risk management. Meanwhile, business continuity planning is growing to embrace the need to think about how a changing climate impacts on business.
Worldwide companies are increasingly aware that their supply chains are exposed to greater weather extremes. International competition and cheap transportation have led to expansive supply chains linked by complex logistics, multiplying risks to business continuity. The Business Continuity Institute’s latest Horizon Scanning Survey, with results from 700 organizations in 62 countries, found 53% of the survey respondents were either ‘extremely concerned’ or ‘concerned’ about the impacts of adverse weather on their businesses (BCI 2013). Business leaders are now urging companies to think about climate change (Business Green, 2013).
This document discusses risk management strategies for outsourcing at AMD Nasik. It provides contact information for three managers involved in outsourcing. The abstract indicates it will discuss risk management case studies from AMD Nasik's outsourcing activities for the SU30 project over 7-8 years. Keywords include outsourcing, packages, educating suppliers, and parallel suppliers. The document then outlines AMD Nasik's risk management process and provides examples of retendering when initial quotes are too low and placing purchase orders with multiple suppliers for the same part.
Supply Chain Risk Strategies for Emerging Markets by Brittain LaddBrittain Ladd
This document discusses supply chain risk strategies for companies operating in emerging markets. It notes that while emerging markets offer growth opportunities, they also present significant risks that companies need to manage. The document outlines various types of supply chain risks, such as macroeconomic risks, risks from partners and internal operations. It emphasizes that companies should take a holistic approach to assessing risks across their entire supply chains and implement resilience strategies to mitigate vulnerabilities. Managing supply chain risk is particularly important in emerging markets due to factors like unclear regulations and infrastructure challenges.
This document discusses strategies for reducing supply chain risk while limiting the impact on cost efficiency. It presents two main strategies: 1) segmenting the supply chain by sourcing different products from multiple locations, as clothing retailer Zara does, and 2) regionalizing the supply chain by establishing regional production and distribution networks rather than global ones. These strategies help contain disruptions to part of the supply chain rather than allowing impacts to spread globally. The document also discusses leveraging existing IT systems to enable faster response to disruptions when they occur.
How AGCO implemented an Supply Chain Risk management solution to save millionsHeiko Schwarz
1) AGCO, a global manufacturer of agricultural machinery, implemented a supply chain risk management (SCRM) solution from riskmethods to address risks from their global supply base.
2) Their previous fragmented approach led to inefficiencies when disruptions occurred, so they centralized procurement and appointed a risk manager.
3) The riskmethods solution provided automated risk monitoring and visibility across AGCO's top 250 suppliers.
4) AGCO estimated millions in cost savings from avoided disruptions, improved sourcing decisions, and automation of manual risk processes.
SUPPLY CHAIN FINANCE IN THE CONTEXT OF WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENTIgor Zax (Zaks)
Igor Zax, Managing Director of Tenzor Ltd., published a special report, Supply Chain Finance in the Context of Working Capital Management .
The report, published in conjunction with BCR Publishing, covers industry structure, risk management, financing and operational aspects, the way companies viewed the product, as well as trade offs between dynamic discounting and supply chain finance products.
In all of its forms, risk management is rapidly growing in importance within the commodity asset class. It will only become even more critical and complex in the future. Driven by unprecedented levels of change in the industry ranging from geopolitics to carbon, effective risk management is shifting for many commodity firms from just another activity to be managed to a critical component of business strategy that helps drive and inform brand, gain financing and trust, and demonstrates proper controls.
The COVID-19 pandemic is having a major financial and operational impact on the industrial manufacturing sector. Many manufacturing jobs cannot be done remotely, and slowed economic activity has reduced demand for industrial products globally. Plant closures and layoffs have already occurred as manufacturers struggle with declining revenues and demand. The crisis has also disrupted global supply chains. Manufacturers face continued pressure and uncertainty as the duration of the pandemic is unknown. They must take steps to ensure workforce safety, financial stability, and supply chain resilience to prepare for a prolonged recovery period.
Study ROI of Supply Chain Risk Management (riskmethods Nov 2014)Heiko Schwarz
“ROI of Supply Chain Risk Management” The study provides detailed information on which individual potentials - that can be evaluated in monetary terms - provide the source for calculating ROI of SCRM. Learn more download the brand new study about SCRM!
Welcome to this Autumn 2015 edition of Inperspective, Aon UK’s
review of the risk and insurance issues facing the retail and
wholesale industries. In this edition we focus on the steps risk
managers are taking to plan for one of the busiest consumer
spending periods in history.
This document provides five tips for maintaining an effective supply chain during a financial crisis:
1. Communicate regularly with Electronic Manufacturing Services providers to agree on demand forecasts and avoid overcorrecting supply levels.
2. Reduce lead times in ERP systems to reflect supply realities and reduced material exposure with contracting markets.
3. Validate the financial viability of critical suppliers and their major customers to understand risks.
4. Build long-term relationships with suppliers to ensure flexibility and support during downturns and subsequent upturns.
5. Do not ignore reduced sales forecasts - the downturn is real, inventory is a liability, and cash is critical for survival.
Supplier financial stability and risk differentiation in turbulent times -sup...Thomas Tanel
There is a Darwinian effect occurring in the supply chain as Fortune 1000 companies cut weaker suppliers. The simple fact is that in today’s longer global supply chains, product
moves over greater distances and across more multinational borders than in the more localized supply chains of the past. In an era of wildly fluctuating commodity prices and security regulations, the coordination and execution required for international shipments has become
more of a challenge than in the past.
Digitalization as Means to Overcome Supply Chain Disruptions.pdfTuan Le Anh
This document is a summary of part one of a three-part e-book series on digitalization trends for 2022. It discusses how digitalization can help companies overcome major supply chain disruptions through increased visibility, risk management, and responsiveness. Modern technologies like AI and cloud-based platforms are transforming supply chains by enabling real-time monitoring and analytics. Digital tools for data exchange and document management can streamline processes and optimize decision making. Adopting the right digital solutions is key for businesses to build resilience against ongoing disruptions and gain a competitive advantage.
1. Managing risk in global supply chains involves implementing strategies to manage everyday and exceptional risks across the supply chain through continuous risk assessment to reduce vulnerability and ensure continuity.
2. As companies outsource production globally to reduce costs, they introduce new risks related to culture, distance, time zones, and differing priorities between entities in the supply chain.
3. Managing a global supply chain requires understanding the cultural and operational dynamics in each location, as even neighboring countries can have important differences in risk tolerance, traditions, saving habits, and focus on quick versus sustained results. Failing to account for these differences can lead to disappointments and increased costs.
Complexity in business arises from the diversity of markets, customers, products, processes, components (parts or materials) and suppliers that a company chooses to deal with. Most managers recognise that complexity
comes at a cost - both in activities and overhead. But to be competitive, it is important to understand where and how the market rewards differentiation, and to root out all complexity that cannot be justified.
Complexity can hinder the performance of supply chains and the proliferation of products can lead to excessive set-ups and costs during manufacture.
Errors in forecasting can be magnified which may increase the chance of stock-outs and drive up the costs of distribution. But the answer is not to simply cull products indiscriminately from the range. Companies need to
balance the costs of complexity with how the market values variety.
Many low-volume products lose money after the associated costs of complexity are accounted for. And some products thought to be adding complexity are
quite profitable, because they generate high margins. It may appear tempting just to eliminate ‘the tail’ of the portfolio of products. But the answer lies in understanding the inter-dependencies within the portfolio and pinpointing the trade-offs between the requirements of the market, revenues, costs, and stakeholders' ambitions for growth. People from Marketing, Sales, Development, Supply Chain and Manufacturing have different perspectives on
what needs to be done. Only by collaborating can complexity be reduced and contained.
The major forces driving globalization include advancements in technology and communication networks that facilitate the flow of goods, services, and ideas worldwide; reductions in trade barriers by governments seeking to promote free trade and economic growth; and increasing consumer demand globally for a wide variety of products as standards of living rise.
Monitoring of latent risks and an early warning system for events enable prompt implementation of appropriate preventive measures in a crisis situation. These predefined actions, together with quicker crisis response time and assessment of the criticality can save costs and time. Read more about the step-by-step approach, and conceptual and organizational implementation of risk identification!
40 Rotman Magazine Spring 2007The vast majority of today.docxtamicawaysmith
40 / Rotman Magazine Spring 2007
The vast majority of today’s business decisions
are made with incomplete information and in the face of an uncer-
tain future. Indeed, with the exception of a reasonable expectation
that the sun will come up tomorrow, few things in human affairs can
be predicted with certainty. The term ‘risk management’ has come
to serve as a set phrase in the financial services industry, referring
to a formal process for evaluating and controlling a company’s total
exposure to loss together with estimates of the probability of loss.
However, this term deserves to be reclaimed to a broader usage, as
all companies have to deal with risk.
While risk can never be completely avoided, well-trained man-
agers have many ways to take uncertainty into account in their
strategy planning. Successful long-term planning includes a combi-
nation of the following six techniques.
1. Risk Identification
In most business situations it is remarkably easy to identify the
risks that a firm is facing by simply asking, “What could go wrong?”
For example, if a product depends on components, the inability of
a supplier to ship parts when needed is a risk that can be readily
anticipated. Where a firm is attempting to develop a new technol-
ogy, its research and development efforts will be successful in
achieving desired performance – or not.
This is not to say that all risks can be foreseen. Former U.S.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld famously observed that
there are both ‘known unknowns’ and ‘unknown unknowns.’ In a
military situation, he meant that an army might know that its
adversary had troops over the horizon, but not exactly how many (a
‘known unknown’); and there might be some uncertainty as to
whether the enemy had certain types of weapons (again, a known
unknown). However, his dictum was meant to alert planners that,
for all the variables that they could list and worry about, there
would always be some others that could not have been anticipated
(the ‘unknown unknowns’).
It is hard to describe an ‘unknown unknown’ in business, simply
because it is just that – unknown. However, an example would be
A Primer on the
Management of
Risk and Uncertainty
By David Robinson
Effective risk management depends on a clear understanding of
what a firm can control and what factors are beyond its control.
Using a combination of the techniques described here can go a long
way to effective strategic planning in the face of risk.
Strategy
Near Misses
Plan
ROT045
This document is authorized for use only by Familia Herring in Strategy at Strayer University, 2018.
Rotman Magazine Spring 2007 / 41
something like the emergence of a completely new technology, such
as the advent of transistors in electronics. The efficiency and minia-
turization offered by these solid-state devices could not have been
predicted from the existing development work on thermionic valves.
How can business leaders plan for the unknown unknown? At
the extreme, t ...
This report summarizes the findings of a study on managing risk in the global supply chain. The study surveyed 150 supply chain executives and conducted interviews. It found that while disruptions can significantly impact business performance, most companies do little to formally manage supply chain risk. They do not use outside expertise or quantify risks. On average, only 25% of supply chains are assessed for risk. The report provides recommendations for identifying, prioritizing and mitigating risks through measures like strong suppliers, visibility, insurance, and having backup plans.
This document discusses managing risk in the supply chain. It begins by explaining how today's marketplace is characterized by more turbulence and uncertainty, making supply chains more vulnerable. It then discusses understanding an organization's supply chain risk profile by identifying key drivers, critical infrastructure, vulnerabilities, modeling scenarios, developing risk mitigation responses, and monitoring the risk environment. The document provides examples and outlines a seven stage process for managing supply chain risk that includes understanding the entire supply chain, identifying risks, assessing impacts, prioritizing risks, developing strategies, implementing actions, and monitoring/reviewing. Overall, it stresses the importance of organizations developing programs to mitigate supply chain risks.
Similar to Q2_09_An Ounce of Prevention_LowRes (20)
1. ARTICLE
PRTMInsightreprinted from | Second Quarter 2009
An Ounce of Prevention
Managing supply chain risk to eliminate threats proactively
CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION
CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION CAUTIO
2. ARTICLE An Ounce of Prevention
reprinted from PRTM Insight, Q2 2009
| 2
F
ires, earthquakes, hurricanes. These are
some of the natural disasters that have long
disrupted the balance in extended global
supply chains. And then there are the risks “du
jour”—piracy, salmonella outbreaks, and oil
price swings. Yet sometimes the events that don’t
make the headlines can take just as great a toll:
the default of an important supplier, changes in
environmental regulations, or restrictions on port
capacity, to name a few (Figure 1).
Whatever the culprit, the
threat of a sudden disrup-
tion makes risk management
critical for any company that
has a supply chain span-
ning several continents.
However, companies often
underestimate what’s needed
to manage risk effectively or where their supply
chains are most at risk. This is especially true of
the firms that outsource to Asia to take advantage
of lower labor and material costs. According to a
recent survey, China is believed to be the region
that poses the greatest risk to supply chains
because of issues with product quality, intel-
lectual property, and data security (“Managing
the Biggest Supply Chain Risk of All: Constant
Change,” AMR Research, December 2008).
In these uncertain times, the best approach
companies can take is to develop a comprehen-
sive view of the various risks that threaten their
supply chains. They can then mitigate these risks
by improving visibility, selectively shortening the
supply chain, and strengthening relationships
with suppliers.
Taking a Comprehensive View
Top companies know that managing supply
chain risk depends first and foremost on devel-
oping a thorough understanding of the different
risks inherent in an extended supply chain. These
risks can incur costs across four major categories:
direct production, transportation, working capital,
and reputation (Figure 2).
Quantifiable and unquantifiable costs. Many
of the risks inherent in a longer supply chain
carry a quantifiable impact on cost. It’s not diffi-
cult to determine, for example, how an increase
in the price of raw materials will affect direct
production costs, or how an increase in theft
will affect working capital. Some risks can have
multiple cost implications. The sudden default of
a key supplier can expose a company to switching
costs and production delays, which can lead to
sizable contract penalties.
Some risks incur costs that are harder to
quantify, yet shouldn’t be ignored. Poor working
conditions or environmentally negligent manufac-
turing, for example, can greatly damage a compa-
ny’s reputation and necessitate expensive and
time-intensive crisis management efforts. Wal-
Mart, for one, is especially aware of these costs,
and has taken steps to prevent their recurrence. In
response to revelations concerning the conditions
of supplier factories in Bangladesh and China,
Wal-Mart established more stringent policies to
In today’s uncertain business environment, global companies need to make
managing supply chain risk a top priority. Although many companies focus
on their manufacturing operations, they need to take a holistic view of the
supply chain. This means not only developing the visibility to identify areas at
risk, but also having the strategies in place to eliminate those threats before
they wreak havoc.
Companies often
underestimate what’s
needed to manage risk
effectively or where
their supply chains
are most at risk.
3. ARTICLE An Ounce of Prevention
reprinted from PRTM Insight, Q2 2009
| 3
require suppliers—and suppliers’ suppliers—to
observe labor and environmental laws. And the
company is monitoring these suppliers more care-
fully to make the policies stick.
The efficient frontier. Generally speaking, the
greater the risk a company is willing to expose
its supply chain to, the greater the rewards it can
realize in the form of lower costs and higher profit
margins—until it reaches the point where risk
is so large that profit suffers. To understand the
risk-reward tradeoffs for a specific supply chain,
it’s useful to determine the points where the risk
is lowest for a given reward. Taken together, these
optimal points of risk and reward form a curve
that marks the efficient frontier of supply chain
tradeoffs, analogous to the risk-return model used
in financial portfolio management (Figure 3).
Once a company has established where its
efficient frontier is located, the goal is to find
a new set of points above the existing curve
where the supply chain can help generate larger
margins—without taking on more risk. The
ability to operate on this higher curve is critical to
managing supply chain risk more efficiently than
the competition.
This discussion, by necessity, is very
simplistic. In practice, it’s more complicated
because products often require different risk
management strategies at different stages of
their lifecycles. For example, a manufacturer
of industrial equipment would use a low-risk
domestic sourcing approach for newly introduced
products so that engineers could work closely
with manufacturing to get quality under control.
Then, once the product and market have matured,
the company would relocate sourcing in well-
established low-cost country sources. This move
would help shift the curve up so that the margins
for this product phase increase.
Employing Strategies That Work
Given all the different variables involved,
managing the supply chain risk of a portfolio
of products is a very complex task. There are,
however, some basic ways to manage these
tradeoffs and mitigate supply chain risk.
Improve visibility. All too often, firms find
themselves reacting to problems that have already
taken a toll on supply chain performance. Taking
a proactive approach, leading companies have
improved their ability to see what is going on
throughout the supply chain. They determine
what information they need to increase transpar-
ency in the nodes where risk is greatest and estab-
lish key performance indicators to measure these
risks on a regular basis.
For example, inventory levels and receipts at
key supply chain nodes can be analyzed to deter-
mine if a product is moving through the supply
chain according to schedule. Technologies such as
■ Exchange rate fluctuations
■ Supplier defaults
■ Regulatory actions
■ Extreme weather conditions
■ Changes in port and rail
capacity
■ Customs/border control issues
■ New environmental
regulations
Some Examples of Forgotten Risks
Figure 1: Risks Under the Radar
4. ARTICLE An Ounce of Prevention
reprinted from PRTM Insight, Q2 2009
| 4
barcodes, global positioning systems, and radio-
frequency identification (RFID) tags help ensure
that data is as close to real time as possible. Six
years ago, UK-based retail giant Tesco began
using RFID tags on individual items to monitor
thefts of razor blades and other high-value items.
Today, the company uses these tags on crates to
track the delivery of perishables like milk.
Sometimes, however,
simple data collection will
suffice. For example, a $10
B specialty retailer with
thousands of stores in North
America was having problems
with delays its shipments were
encountering at various U.S.
ports. The company started
tracking these delays and discovered that most of
the containers destined for Long Beach, one of the
Los Angeles-area ports, were arriving later than
usual. Betting that the delays would only worsen
during the upcoming Christmas peak season, the
company proactively shifted deliveries of key ship-
ments to Tacoma, WA, a far less congested port.
This strategy added some minor costs to the equa-
tion. But the improvement in delivery times—and
the prevention of lost sales and customer regard—
more than made up the difference.
Selectively shorten the supply chain.
Increasing numbers of firms are engaged in near-
sourcing, moving production of critical products
or components from low-cost countries to places
that are closer to major markets. This practice
provides the best of both worlds. It helps improve
time to market and distribution flexibility while
containing labor, material, and total landed
costs. Manufacturers can use offshore produc-
tion for products where cost is paramount, and
reserve near-shore production for cases when the
risk mitigation and responsiveness to changing
customer demands take priority.
Some companies effectively deploy different
risk management strategies at various points
in a product’s lifecycle, with the strategy depen-
dent on the type of product. Joseph Abboud, a
US-based clothing company, has a long lead time
for producing its new apparel, and so it conducts
this production overseas in low-cost countries.
But since the lifecycle for such clothing is short,
Abboud also needs to able to react quickly if
demand for those items suddenly explodes. So it
uses a U.S. manufacturing facility to replenish
stores in this key market.
Contrast this company with a manufacturer in
the defense and aerospace industry that sells highly
engineered, long-lifecycle products. For this type of
product, it’s important to mitigate risk in the early
stage of development. The company has located its
engineering staff near its production facilities, so
that the teams can work closely together to finalize
product design and launch. Then, as the market for
the product grows and demand stabilizes, the firm
will move production to a low-cost country to cut
costs and improve margins.
Taking a proactive
approach, leading
companies have
improved their ability
to see what is going
on throughout the
supply chain.
Figure 2: Understanding the Costs of Risk
Raw material price volatility
Border control issues
Rise in damages and theft
Product-quality incidents
EXAMPLE
Direct production
Transportation
Working capital
Reputation
COST IMPACT
5. ARTICLE An Ounce of Prevention
reprinted from PRTM Insight, Q2 2009
| 5
Strengthen supplier relationships. Extended
supply chains and broader geographic demands
make strong relationships with suppliers even
more critical to managing risk than in the past.
Leading companies today are taking preemptive
steps by working more closely with key suppliers.
This means not only sharing data, but also helping
suppliers understand the specific risk factors
facing the supply chain, and jointly developing a
plan to address these factors. At the same time,
it’s important to help suppliers improve their own
operations, since even a small glitch can rever-
berate through the supply chain.
In the food industry, quality issues—think
tomatoes, peanut butter, and pistachios, to name
a few—are occurring with increasing frequency
as salmonella outbreaks become more common.
Taking food off grocery store shelves doesn’t solve
the problem. Leading food retailer Sainsbury’s in
the UK has addressed this issue by not only care-
fully selecting its choice of suppliers, but also by
performing unannounced inspections of supplier
facilities to ensure they continually meet quality
and safety standards.
Strong supplier relationships also constitute
an important form of quality management for
Toyota. The company famous for introducing
Lean manufacturing to the world staunchly
believes that its suppliers need to embrace these
concepts—and has taken steps to make this
happen. When building an assembly plant in
Texas for its Tundra truck, Toyota created an
on-campus site for 21 suppliers so they would
be nearby. The company has also increased its
equity position in some suppliers like Japan-based
Denso, and has put Toyota employees in some
suppliers’ organizations.
Looking Ahead
Extending the supply chain is a decision that
can’t easily be reversed. Once companies move
production to a distant location, they can lose the
local skill sets and infrastructure that would make
it possible to replant domestic manufacturing later
on. So it’s critically important that any company
considering offshoring make the decision with full
knowledge of the risks being assumed.
That said, any company that already has a
global supply chain in place cannot be competi-
tive without a comprehensive risk mitigation
strategy. There is no one size fits all answer: Ulti-
mately, every firm must deploy an approach best
suited to its business and operational goals. But
there are some general principles all companies
Risk
MarginLowHigh
MaximumMinimum
Point of diminishing returns
Efficient
frontier
Figure 3: Shifting the Curve
Effectively managing supply chain risk requires
improving margins without increasing risk
6. ARTICLE An Ounce of Prevention
reprinted from PRTM Insight, Q2 2009
| 6
should keep in mind.
Align the footprint to risk. As a rule of
thumb, companies should determine the points
on the value chain that create the greatest value
and the points that incur the greatest costs.
These are the areas where a company has the
most to gain or lose and,
as a result, where its risk is
greatest. Decisions to improve
margins on these activities
need to consider whether the
improvement is worth taking
on the additional risk. For
example, a high-end bicycle
producer found that it made
sense to locate the high-value,
high-risk activities—frame fabrication, painting,
and final assembly—close to the end consumer.
At the same time, the company moved the
sourcing of its lower-risk, lower-value compo-
nents to countries where labor was relatively
inexpensive.
Make it a team effort. Competing interests
often cause planning to stagnate, leaving the
company unprepared when new risks emerge. In
many cases, different functions of the organiza-
tion can be so focused on their own immediate
goals (whether delivery times, customer satis-
faction, or transportation rates) that it becomes
nearly impossible to reach a consensus about
the best strategy for the company as a whole. For
a balanced approach, all relevant functions—
product planning, design and development,
sourcing, logistics, regulatory compliance, and
finance—need to be involved in identifying key
risks and the means for measuring them. This is
critical to developing a flexible supply chain with
minimum risk.
Be vigilant. Both companies that are planning
a global supply chain and those that already have
one in place need to take a proactive approach to
risk. While the past can be instructive, it’s not the
sole indicator of what may happen in the future.
Some of the risks that have become realities
over the past couple of years—the credit crisis,
wide swings in oil prices, and the slide of entire
industries—have rarely occurred in combination
in the past. So it’s essential to keep reassessing
the risks on the horizon, as well as the strategies
for mitigating them.
In today’s business environment, what
seemed an impossibility a short time ago is a
possibility now. For that reason, companies that
will get ahead in the long run are focusing on
mitigating risk throughout their supply chains.
They know that when uncertainty is a constant,
the winners leave nothing to chance.
For more information, please contact:
Mark Crone, PRTM Principal
mcrone@prtm.com, +1 212.915.2600
Jeff Holmes, PRTM Director
jholmes@prtm.com, +1 202.756.1700
Kyle Hill, PRTM Manager
khill@prtm.com, +1 86 21.3860.7888
Near-sourcing
helps improve time
to market and
distribution flexibility
while containing labor,
material, and total
landed costs.