Psych 30 module one
•Download as PPT, PDF•
4 likes•1,588 views
This document provides an overview of Module 1 of a Labor Code class. It defines key labor law terms and discusses the importance and purpose of labor laws in the Philippines. The summary highlights that labor laws in the Philippines are designed to protect workers' rights and promote social justice based on constitutional provisions. Labor laws establish minimum employment standards and regulate the relationship between employers and employees.
![MODULE 1 ,[object Object]]()
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Psych 30 module one
Similar to Psych 30 module one (20)
More from Harve Abella
More from Harve Abella (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Psych 30 module one
- 1. Atty. Harve B. Abella, Esq. Psych 30 MWF 6:30 – 7:30PM Psych 30 TTh 7:00 – 8:30PM
- 8. LABOR LEGISLATION SOCIAL LEGISLATION 1. Directly affects employment 1. Governs the effects of employment 2. Designed to meet the daily needs of the workers 2. Involves a long range of benefits 3. Covers employment for profit or gain 3. Covers employment, profit & non-profit 4. Affects work of the employee 4. Affects the life of the employee
- 9. How to understand the LCP Interlocking Mechanisms of Philippine Labor Laws / Social Legislation
- 25. End of Module 1
Editor's Notes
- Social Legislation is broader in scope than labor legislation because All labor laws are social legislation but not all social legislations are labor laws.
- -it should not be deduced that the basic policy is to favor labor to prejudice capital. -both sectors need each other. INTERDEPENDENT. -THE BASIC POLICY IS TO BALANCE OR COORDINATE THE RIGHTS AND INTEREST OF BOTH WORKERS AND EMPLOYEES. Relate this with Sec. 3, Article XIII of the Constitution on Shared Responsibility
- Not all labor disputes should be resolved in favor, since the law protects the rights of both labor and capital. – Colgate Palmolive Philippines vs Ople, GR ?No. 73681, June 30, 1988)