This document provides an overview of the components and architecture for a project to acquire unstructured data from various sources for sentiment analysis. The main objectives are to streamline data acquisition, create corpora for contextual opinions and sentiments, and detect trends based on reviews and comments. The proposed architecture uses Python, Django, Scrapy, MySQL/MongoDB/Hbase for data storage, and R Project and Hadoop for text mining and massive storage. It describes how crawlers and APIs will be used to gather data from social media and other sources for preprocessing, analysis and output of results.
Can Deep Learning solve the Sentiment Analysis ProblemMark Cieliebak
Sentiment analysis appears to be one of the easier tasks in the realm of text analytics: given a text like a tweet or product review, decide whether it contains positive or negative opinion. This task is almost trivial for humans, but it turns out to be a true challenge for automated systems. In fact, state-of-the-art sentiment analysis tools are wrong on approx. 4 out of 10 documents.
Current sentiment analysis tools are rule-based, feature-based, or combinations of both. However, recent research uses deep learning on very large sets of documents.
In this talk, we will explain the intrinsic difficulties of automated sentiment analysis; present existing solution approaches and their performance; describe an architecture for a deep learning system; and explore whether deep learning can improve sentiment analysis accuracy.
Researchers have long known that the words of a text have always contained more information than on the surface. As such, texts have been studied for subtexts and other latent or hidden information. One approach has involved the machine-enabled analysis of human sentiment, usually mapped out on a positive-negative polarity. NVivo 11 Plus (a qualitative research tool released in late 2015) enables the automated sentiment analysis of texts (coded research, formal articles, text corpora, Tweetstream datasets, Facebook wall posts, websites, and other sources) based on four categories: very positive, moderately positive, moderately negative, and very negative. The tool feature compares the target text set against a sentiment dictionary and enables coding at different units of analysis: sentence, paragraph, or cell. Further, the sentiment capability extracts the coded text into respective text sets which may be further analyzed using text frequency counts, text searches, automated theme and sub-theme extractions (topic modeling), and data visualizations.
Sentiment analysis over Twitter offers organisations and individuals a fast and effective way to monitor the publics' feelings towards them and their competitors. To assess the performance of sentiment analysis methods over Twitter a small set of evaluation datasets have been released in the last few years. In this paper we present an overview of eight publicly available and manually annotated evaluation datasets for Twitter sentiment analysis. Based on this review, we show that a common limitation of most of these datasets, when assessing sentiment analysis at target (entity) level, is the lack of distinctive sentiment annotations among the tweets and the entities contained in them. For example, the tweet ``I love iPhone, but I hate iPad'' can be annotated with a mixed sentiment label, but the entity iPhone within this tweet should be annotated with a positive sentiment label. Aiming to overcome this limitation, and to complement current evaluation datasets, we present STS-Gold, a new evaluation dataset where tweets and targets (entities) are annotated individually and therefore may present different sentiment labels. This paper also provides a comparative study of the various datasets along several dimensions including: total number of tweets, vocabulary size and sparsity. We also investigate the pair-wise correlation among these dimensions as well as their correlations to the sentiment classification performance on different datasets.
Most existing approaches to Twitter sentiment analysis assume that sentiment is explicitly expressed through affective words. Nevertheless, sentiment is often implicitly expressed via latent semantic relations, patterns and dependencies among words in tweets. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that automatically captures patterns of words of similar contextual semantics and sentiment in tweets. Unlike previous work on sentiment pattern extraction, our proposed approach does not rely on external and fixed sets of syntactical templates/patterns, nor requires deep analyses of the syntactic structure of sentences in tweets.
We evaluate our approach with tweet- and entity-level sentiment analysis tasks by using the extracted semantic patterns as classification features in both tasks. We use 9 Twitter datasets in our evaluation and compare the performance of our patterns against 6 state-of-the-art baselines. Results show that our patterns consistently outperform all other baselines on all datasets by 2.19% at the tweet-level and 7.5% at the entity-level in average F-measure.
Can Deep Learning solve the Sentiment Analysis ProblemMark Cieliebak
Sentiment analysis appears to be one of the easier tasks in the realm of text analytics: given a text like a tweet or product review, decide whether it contains positive or negative opinion. This task is almost trivial for humans, but it turns out to be a true challenge for automated systems. In fact, state-of-the-art sentiment analysis tools are wrong on approx. 4 out of 10 documents.
Current sentiment analysis tools are rule-based, feature-based, or combinations of both. However, recent research uses deep learning on very large sets of documents.
In this talk, we will explain the intrinsic difficulties of automated sentiment analysis; present existing solution approaches and their performance; describe an architecture for a deep learning system; and explore whether deep learning can improve sentiment analysis accuracy.
Researchers have long known that the words of a text have always contained more information than on the surface. As such, texts have been studied for subtexts and other latent or hidden information. One approach has involved the machine-enabled analysis of human sentiment, usually mapped out on a positive-negative polarity. NVivo 11 Plus (a qualitative research tool released in late 2015) enables the automated sentiment analysis of texts (coded research, formal articles, text corpora, Tweetstream datasets, Facebook wall posts, websites, and other sources) based on four categories: very positive, moderately positive, moderately negative, and very negative. The tool feature compares the target text set against a sentiment dictionary and enables coding at different units of analysis: sentence, paragraph, or cell. Further, the sentiment capability extracts the coded text into respective text sets which may be further analyzed using text frequency counts, text searches, automated theme and sub-theme extractions (topic modeling), and data visualizations.
Sentiment analysis over Twitter offers organisations and individuals a fast and effective way to monitor the publics' feelings towards them and their competitors. To assess the performance of sentiment analysis methods over Twitter a small set of evaluation datasets have been released in the last few years. In this paper we present an overview of eight publicly available and manually annotated evaluation datasets for Twitter sentiment analysis. Based on this review, we show that a common limitation of most of these datasets, when assessing sentiment analysis at target (entity) level, is the lack of distinctive sentiment annotations among the tweets and the entities contained in them. For example, the tweet ``I love iPhone, but I hate iPad'' can be annotated with a mixed sentiment label, but the entity iPhone within this tweet should be annotated with a positive sentiment label. Aiming to overcome this limitation, and to complement current evaluation datasets, we present STS-Gold, a new evaluation dataset where tweets and targets (entities) are annotated individually and therefore may present different sentiment labels. This paper also provides a comparative study of the various datasets along several dimensions including: total number of tweets, vocabulary size and sparsity. We also investigate the pair-wise correlation among these dimensions as well as their correlations to the sentiment classification performance on different datasets.
Most existing approaches to Twitter sentiment analysis assume that sentiment is explicitly expressed through affective words. Nevertheless, sentiment is often implicitly expressed via latent semantic relations, patterns and dependencies among words in tweets. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that automatically captures patterns of words of similar contextual semantics and sentiment in tweets. Unlike previous work on sentiment pattern extraction, our proposed approach does not rely on external and fixed sets of syntactical templates/patterns, nor requires deep analyses of the syntactic structure of sentences in tweets.
We evaluate our approach with tweet- and entity-level sentiment analysis tasks by using the extracted semantic patterns as classification features in both tasks. We use 9 Twitter datasets in our evaluation and compare the performance of our patterns against 6 state-of-the-art baselines. Results show that our patterns consistently outperform all other baselines on all datasets by 2.19% at the tweet-level and 7.5% at the entity-level in average F-measure.
In recent times, research activities in the areas of Opinion and Sentiment analysis in natural language texts and other media are gaining ground under the umbrella of subjectivity analysis. The reason may be the huge amount of available text data in the Social Web in the forms of news, reviews, blogs, chats and even twitter. Though Sentiment analysis from natural lan-guage text is a multifaceted and multidisciplinary problem, in general, the term “sentiment” is used in reference to the automatic analysis of evaluative text.
Seminar presentation made by me for the topic of 'Resources for Sentiment Analysis' at IIT Bombay. Includes a set of bonus slides for additional information which was not actually presented.
Lexicon-based approaches to Twitter sentiment analysis are gaining much popularity due to their simplicity, domain independence, and relatively good performance. These approaches rely on sentiment lexicons, where a collection of words are marked with fixed sentiment polarities. However, words' sentiment orientation (positive, neural, negative) and/or sentiment strengths could change depending on context and targeted entities. In this paper we present SentiCircle; a novel lexicon-based approach that takes into account the contextual and conceptual semantics of words when calculating their sentiment orientation and strength in Twitter. We evaluate our approach on three Twitter datasets using three different sentiment lexicons. Results show that our approach significantly outperforms two lexicon baselines. Results are competitive but inconclusive when comparing to state-of-art SentiStrength, and vary from one dataset to another. SentiCircle outperforms SentiStrength in accuracy on average, but falls marginally behind in F-measure.
A text extraction workshop delivered by Cameron Buckner on Friday, October 18th, 2012 as part of the University of Houston Digital Humanities Initiative.
Target-Based Sentiment Anaysis as a Sequence-Tagging Taskjcscholtes
November 2019, Zoe Gerolemou successfully presented our paper on Target-Based Sentiment Analysis as a Sequence-Tagging Task at the Benelux Artificial Intelligence Conference (BNAIC 2019). In this research, we were not only able to detect sentiments with very high confidence, but also to determine WHO expressed this sentiments and about WHAT. Many great questions and several other very interesting presentations in the NLP session.
Best Practices for Large Scale Text Mining ProcessingOntotext
Q&A:
NOW facilitates semantic search by having annotations attached to search strings. How compolex does that get, e.g. with wildcards between annotated strings?
NOW’s searchbox is quite basic at the moment, but still supports a few scenarios.
1. Pure concept/faceted search - search for all documents containing a concept or where a set of concepts are co-occurring. Ranking is based on frequence of occurrence.
2. Concept/faceted + Full Text search - search for both concepts and particular textual term of phrase.
3. Full text search
With search, pretty much anything can be done to customise it. For the NOW showcase we’ve kept it fairly simple, as usually every client has a slightly different case and wants to tune search in a slightly different direction.
The search in NOW is faceted which means that you search with concepts (facets) and you retrieve all documents which contain mentions of the searched concept. If you search by more than one facet the engine retrieves documents which contain mentions of both concepts but there is no restriction that they occur next to each other.
Is the tagging service expandable (say with custom ontologies)? also is it a something you offer as a service? it is unclear to me from the website.
The TAG service is used for demonstration purposes only. The models behind it are trained for annotating news articles. The pipeline is customizable for every concrete scenario, different domains and entities of interest. You can access several of our pipelines as a service through the S4 platform or you can have them hosted as an on premise solution. In some cases our clients want domain adaptation or improvements in particular area, or to tag with their internal dataset - in this case we offer again an on premise deployment and also a managed service hosted on our hardware.
Hdoes your system accomodate cluster analysis using unsupervised keyword/phrase annotation for knowledge discovery?
As much as the patterns of user behaviour are also considered knowledge discovery we employ these for suggesting related reads. Apart from these we have experience tailoring custom clustering pipelines which also rely on features like keyword and named entities.
For topic extraction how many topics can we extract? from twitter corpus wgat csn we infer?
For topic extraction we have determined that we obtain best results when suggesting 3 categories. These are taken from IPTC but only the uppermost levels which are less than 20.
The twitter corpus example is from a project Ontotext participates in called Pheme. The goal of the project is to detect rumours and to check their veracity, thus help journalists in their hunt for attractive news.
Do you provide Processing Resources and JAPE rules for GATE framework and that can be used with GATE embedded?
We are contributing to the GATE framework and everything which has been wrapped up as PRs has been included the corresponding GATE distributions.
Charlie Greenbacker, founder and co-organizer of the DC NLP meetup group, provides a "crash course" in Natural Language Processing techniques and applications.
myassignmenthelp is premier service provider for NLP related assignments and projects. Given PPT describes processes involved in NLP programming.so whenever you need help in any work related to natural language processing feel free to get in touch with us.
Topic Modelling: Tutorial on Usage and ApplicationsAyush Jain
This is a tutorial on topic modelling techniques - that informs the reader about the basic ingredients of all topic models, and allows them to develop a new model in the end.
Xbots provides chatbot and conversational AI solutions for businesses, personalizing the customer experience. Businesses have an opportunity to capitalize on the chatbot opportunity, and build a presence where their customers are, messengers.
Visit us: www.xbots.ai
Contact: info@xbots.ai
In recent times, research activities in the areas of Opinion and Sentiment analysis in natural language texts and other media are gaining ground under the umbrella of subjectivity analysis. The reason may be the huge amount of available text data in the Social Web in the forms of news, reviews, blogs, chats and even twitter. Though Sentiment analysis from natural lan-guage text is a multifaceted and multidisciplinary problem, in general, the term “sentiment” is used in reference to the automatic analysis of evaluative text.
Seminar presentation made by me for the topic of 'Resources for Sentiment Analysis' at IIT Bombay. Includes a set of bonus slides for additional information which was not actually presented.
Lexicon-based approaches to Twitter sentiment analysis are gaining much popularity due to their simplicity, domain independence, and relatively good performance. These approaches rely on sentiment lexicons, where a collection of words are marked with fixed sentiment polarities. However, words' sentiment orientation (positive, neural, negative) and/or sentiment strengths could change depending on context and targeted entities. In this paper we present SentiCircle; a novel lexicon-based approach that takes into account the contextual and conceptual semantics of words when calculating their sentiment orientation and strength in Twitter. We evaluate our approach on three Twitter datasets using three different sentiment lexicons. Results show that our approach significantly outperforms two lexicon baselines. Results are competitive but inconclusive when comparing to state-of-art SentiStrength, and vary from one dataset to another. SentiCircle outperforms SentiStrength in accuracy on average, but falls marginally behind in F-measure.
A text extraction workshop delivered by Cameron Buckner on Friday, October 18th, 2012 as part of the University of Houston Digital Humanities Initiative.
Target-Based Sentiment Anaysis as a Sequence-Tagging Taskjcscholtes
November 2019, Zoe Gerolemou successfully presented our paper on Target-Based Sentiment Analysis as a Sequence-Tagging Task at the Benelux Artificial Intelligence Conference (BNAIC 2019). In this research, we were not only able to detect sentiments with very high confidence, but also to determine WHO expressed this sentiments and about WHAT. Many great questions and several other very interesting presentations in the NLP session.
Best Practices for Large Scale Text Mining ProcessingOntotext
Q&A:
NOW facilitates semantic search by having annotations attached to search strings. How compolex does that get, e.g. with wildcards between annotated strings?
NOW’s searchbox is quite basic at the moment, but still supports a few scenarios.
1. Pure concept/faceted search - search for all documents containing a concept or where a set of concepts are co-occurring. Ranking is based on frequence of occurrence.
2. Concept/faceted + Full Text search - search for both concepts and particular textual term of phrase.
3. Full text search
With search, pretty much anything can be done to customise it. For the NOW showcase we’ve kept it fairly simple, as usually every client has a slightly different case and wants to tune search in a slightly different direction.
The search in NOW is faceted which means that you search with concepts (facets) and you retrieve all documents which contain mentions of the searched concept. If you search by more than one facet the engine retrieves documents which contain mentions of both concepts but there is no restriction that they occur next to each other.
Is the tagging service expandable (say with custom ontologies)? also is it a something you offer as a service? it is unclear to me from the website.
The TAG service is used for demonstration purposes only. The models behind it are trained for annotating news articles. The pipeline is customizable for every concrete scenario, different domains and entities of interest. You can access several of our pipelines as a service through the S4 platform or you can have them hosted as an on premise solution. In some cases our clients want domain adaptation or improvements in particular area, or to tag with their internal dataset - in this case we offer again an on premise deployment and also a managed service hosted on our hardware.
Hdoes your system accomodate cluster analysis using unsupervised keyword/phrase annotation for knowledge discovery?
As much as the patterns of user behaviour are also considered knowledge discovery we employ these for suggesting related reads. Apart from these we have experience tailoring custom clustering pipelines which also rely on features like keyword and named entities.
For topic extraction how many topics can we extract? from twitter corpus wgat csn we infer?
For topic extraction we have determined that we obtain best results when suggesting 3 categories. These are taken from IPTC but only the uppermost levels which are less than 20.
The twitter corpus example is from a project Ontotext participates in called Pheme. The goal of the project is to detect rumours and to check their veracity, thus help journalists in their hunt for attractive news.
Do you provide Processing Resources and JAPE rules for GATE framework and that can be used with GATE embedded?
We are contributing to the GATE framework and everything which has been wrapped up as PRs has been included the corresponding GATE distributions.
Charlie Greenbacker, founder and co-organizer of the DC NLP meetup group, provides a "crash course" in Natural Language Processing techniques and applications.
myassignmenthelp is premier service provider for NLP related assignments and projects. Given PPT describes processes involved in NLP programming.so whenever you need help in any work related to natural language processing feel free to get in touch with us.
Topic Modelling: Tutorial on Usage and ApplicationsAyush Jain
This is a tutorial on topic modelling techniques - that informs the reader about the basic ingredients of all topic models, and allows them to develop a new model in the end.
Xbots provides chatbot and conversational AI solutions for businesses, personalizing the customer experience. Businesses have an opportunity to capitalize on the chatbot opportunity, and build a presence where their customers are, messengers.
Visit us: www.xbots.ai
Contact: info@xbots.ai
Using artificial intelligence and more specifically bots, in social media, communicating with customers and what its impact will be for humans in customer service.
Adopt clustering and sentiment analysis to find out which topic Jeb Bush cared the most from his email contents during 1999-2006 and compare the voters’ opinions from Twitter
Creating a Next-Generation Big Data ArchitecturePerficient, Inc.
If you’ve spent time investigating Big Data, you quickly realize that the issues surrounding Big Data are often complex to analyze and solve. The sheer volume, velocity and variety changes the way we think about data – including how enterprises approach data architecture.
Significant reduction in costs for processing, managing, and storing data, combined with the need for business agility and analytics, requires CIOs and enterprise architects to rethink their enterprise data architecture and develop a next-generation approach to solve the complexities of Big Data.
Creating the data architecture while integrating Big Data into the heart of the enterprise data architecture is a challenge. This webinar covered:
-Why Big Data capabilities must be strategically integrated into an enterprise’s data architecture
-How a next-generation architecture can be conceptualized
-The key components to a robust next generation architecture
-How to incrementally transition to a next generation data architecture
Project Report for Twitter Sentiment Analysis done using Apache Flume and data is analysed using Hive.
I intend to address the following questions:
How raw tweets can be used to find audience’s perception or sentiment about a person ?
How Hadoop can be used to solve this problem?
How Apache Hive can be used to organize the final data in a tabular format and query it?
How a data visualization tool can be used to display the findings?
*adding English description
This slide is about the overview of a chatbot and a trend of the shift of "messenger as a platform" or "messenger as the new UI".
As Facebook unveiled that they opened their chatbot capability to the public at previous f8, a movement of chatbot (w/ AI) would be gaining traction. aligned with this, what would happen and/or what would impact on existing market.
f8を前にして、facebookの動きが色々と噂されているようだが、メッセンジャー周りの今の動きをまとめてみた。
特にbot x AIや"messenger as a platform"としての動きなど大きな流れに特化。詳細は追々やっていこうと思う。
Employee Management System UML Diagrams Use Case Diagram, Activity Diagram, S...Mohammad Karim Shahbaz
The system as such as it is designed is called Employee Management System (EMS). Employee Management System is documented using UML Diagrams very easy to understand. This Employee Management System is designed to Manage the Recruitment & new Employee Registration process and Manage each Employee data. Attendance Management System and Salary Management Systems are also embedded. UML Diagrams ( Use Case Diagram, Activity Diagram, State Chart Diagram or State Machine, Sequence Diagram, Class Diagram, Deployment Diagram, Component Diagram ) and text are for this documentation. NU,BCS
NOTE: this is total documentation, You can also find this Documentation Related Presentation (.ppt) here:
http://www.slideshare.net/mohammadkarim3785/employee-management-system-uml
SentiTweet is a sentiment analysis tool for identifying the sentiment of the tweets as positive, negative and neutral.SentiTweet comes to rescue to find the sentiment of a single tweet or a set of tweets. Not only that it also enables you to find out the sentiment of the entire tweet or specific phrases of the tweet.
Make a query regarding a topic of interest and come to know the sentiment for the day in pie-chart or for the week in form of line-chart for the tweets gathered from twitter.com
Supervised Learning Based Approach to Aspect Based Sentiment AnalysisTharindu Kumara
Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) systems receive as input a set of texts (e.g., product reviews) discussing a particular entity (e.g., a new model of a laptop). The systems attempt to
identify the main (e.g., the most frequently discussed) aspects (features) of the entity (e.g., battery, screen) and to estimate the average sentiment of the texts per aspect (e.g., how positive or negative the opinions are on average for each aspect).
Dice.com Bay Area Search - Beyond Learning to Rank TalkSimon Hughes
This talk describes how to implement conceptual search (semantic search) within a modern search engine using the word2vec algorithm to learn concepts. We also cover how to auto-tune the search engine parameters using black box optimization techniques, and the problems of feedback loops encountered when building machine learning systems that modify the user behavior used to train the system.
Abaca: Technically Assisted Sensitivity Review of Digital Records
Presentation of our proof-of-concept classifier for assisting sensitivity review of digital records.
Abacá: Technically Assisted Sensitivity Review of Digital RecordsProjectAbaca
The Abacá team spent a very enjoyable and productive half day in Aberystwyth, Wales, with the company of The Welsh Government, National Library of Wales and a member of the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales. Here are our workshop slides.
This tutorial gives an overview of how search engines and machine learning techniques can be tightly coupled to address the need for building scalable recommender or other prediction based systems. Typically, most of them architect retrieval and prediction in two phases. In Phase I, a search engine returns the top-k results based on constraints expressed as a query. In Phase II, the top-k results are re-ranked in another system according to an optimization function that uses a supervised trained model. However this approach presents several issues, such as the possibility of returning sub-optimal results due to the top-k limits during query, as well as the prescence of some inefficiencies in the system due to the decoupling of retrieval and ranking.
To address this issue the authors created ML-Scoring, an open source framework that tightly integrates machine learning models into Elasticsearch, a popular search engine. ML-Scoring replaces the default information retrieval ranking function with a custom supervised model that is trained through Spark, Weka, or R that is loaded as a plugin in Elasticsearch. This tutorial will not only review basic methods in information retrieval and machine learning, but it will also walk through practical examples from loading a dataset into Elasticsearch to training a model in Spark, Weka, or R, to creating the ML-Scoring plugin for Elasticsearch. No prior experience is required in any system listed (Elasticsearch, Spark, Weka, R), though some programming experience is recommended.
RecSys 2015 Tutorial – Scalable Recommender Systems: Where Machine Learning...S. Diana Hu
Search engines have focused on solving the document retrieval problem, so their scoring functions do not handle naturally non-traditional IR data types, such as numerical or categorical. Therefore, on domains beyond traditional search, scores representing strengths of associations or matches may vary widely. As such, the original model doesn’t suffice, so relevance ranking is performed as a two-phase approach with 1) regular search 2) external model to re-rank the filtered items. Metrics such as click-through and conversion rates are associated with the users’ response to items served. The predicted selection rates that arise in real-time can be critical for optimal matching. For example, in recommender systems, predicted performance of a recommended item in a given context, also called response prediction, is often used in determining a set of recommendations to serve in relation to a given serving opportunity. Similar techniques are used in the advertising domain. To address this issue the authors have created ML-Scoring, an open source framework that tightly integrates machine learning models into a popular search engine (SOLR/Elasticsearch), replacing the default IR-based ranking function. A custom model is trained through either Weka or Spark and it is loaded as a plugin used at query time to compute custom scores.
Slides from a short presentation on xAPI Vocabulary and how it can be applied in Learning Analytics, as given at the LAK 2016 JISC Learning Analytics Hackathon.
Enhancing Enterprise Search with Machine Learning - Simon Hughes, Dice.comSimon Hughes
In the talk I describe two approaches for improve the recall and precision of an enterprise search engine using machine learning techniques. The main focus is improving relevancy with ML while using your existing search stack, be that Luce, Solr, Elastic Search, Endeca or something else.
Similar to Data Acquisition for Sentiment Analysis (20)
Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation - Final Version - 5.23...John Andrews
SlideShare Description for "Chatty Kathy - UNC Bootcamp Final Project Presentation"
Title: Chatty Kathy: Enhancing Physical Activity Among Older Adults
Description:
Discover how Chatty Kathy, an innovative project developed at the UNC Bootcamp, aims to tackle the challenge of low physical activity among older adults. Our AI-driven solution uses peer interaction to boost and sustain exercise levels, significantly improving health outcomes. This presentation covers our problem statement, the rationale behind Chatty Kathy, synthetic data and persona creation, model performance metrics, a visual demonstration of the project, and potential future developments. Join us for an insightful Q&A session to explore the potential of this groundbreaking project.
Project Team: Jay Requarth, Jana Avery, John Andrews, Dr. Dick Davis II, Nee Buntoum, Nam Yeongjin & Mat Nicholas
Show drafts
volume_up
Empowering the Data Analytics Ecosystem: A Laser Focus on Value
The data analytics ecosystem thrives when every component functions at its peak, unlocking the true potential of data. Here's a laser focus on key areas for an empowered ecosystem:
1. Democratize Access, Not Data:
Granular Access Controls: Provide users with self-service tools tailored to their specific needs, preventing data overload and misuse.
Data Catalogs: Implement robust data catalogs for easy discovery and understanding of available data sources.
2. Foster Collaboration with Clear Roles:
Data Mesh Architecture: Break down data silos by creating a distributed data ownership model with clear ownership and responsibilities.
Collaborative Workspaces: Utilize interactive platforms where data scientists, analysts, and domain experts can work seamlessly together.
3. Leverage Advanced Analytics Strategically:
AI-powered Automation: Automate repetitive tasks like data cleaning and feature engineering, freeing up data talent for higher-level analysis.
Right-Tool Selection: Strategically choose the most effective advanced analytics techniques (e.g., AI, ML) based on specific business problems.
4. Prioritize Data Quality with Automation:
Automated Data Validation: Implement automated data quality checks to identify and rectify errors at the source, minimizing downstream issues.
Data Lineage Tracking: Track the flow of data throughout the ecosystem, ensuring transparency and facilitating root cause analysis for errors.
5. Cultivate a Data-Driven Mindset:
Metrics-Driven Performance Management: Align KPIs and performance metrics with data-driven insights to ensure actionable decision making.
Data Storytelling Workshops: Equip stakeholders with the skills to translate complex data findings into compelling narratives that drive action.
Benefits of a Precise Ecosystem:
Sharpened Focus: Precise access and clear roles ensure everyone works with the most relevant data, maximizing efficiency.
Actionable Insights: Strategic analytics and automated quality checks lead to more reliable and actionable data insights.
Continuous Improvement: Data-driven performance management fosters a culture of learning and continuous improvement.
Sustainable Growth: Empowered by data, organizations can make informed decisions to drive sustainable growth and innovation.
By focusing on these precise actions, organizations can create an empowered data analytics ecosystem that delivers real value by driving data-driven decisions and maximizing the return on their data investment.
Data Centers - Striving Within A Narrow Range - Research Report - MCG - May 2...pchutichetpong
M Capital Group (“MCG”) expects to see demand and the changing evolution of supply, facilitated through institutional investment rotation out of offices and into work from home (“WFH”), while the ever-expanding need for data storage as global internet usage expands, with experts predicting 5.3 billion users by 2023. These market factors will be underpinned by technological changes, such as progressing cloud services and edge sites, allowing the industry to see strong expected annual growth of 13% over the next 4 years.
Whilst competitive headwinds remain, represented through the recent second bankruptcy filing of Sungard, which blames “COVID-19 and other macroeconomic trends including delayed customer spending decisions, insourcing and reductions in IT spending, energy inflation and reduction in demand for certain services”, the industry has seen key adjustments, where MCG believes that engineering cost management and technological innovation will be paramount to success.
MCG reports that the more favorable market conditions expected over the next few years, helped by the winding down of pandemic restrictions and a hybrid working environment will be driving market momentum forward. The continuous injection of capital by alternative investment firms, as well as the growing infrastructural investment from cloud service providers and social media companies, whose revenues are expected to grow over 3.6x larger by value in 2026, will likely help propel center provision and innovation. These factors paint a promising picture for the industry players that offset rising input costs and adapt to new technologies.
According to M Capital Group: “Specifically, the long-term cost-saving opportunities available from the rise of remote managing will likely aid value growth for the industry. Through margin optimization and further availability of capital for reinvestment, strong players will maintain their competitive foothold, while weaker players exit the market to balance supply and demand.”
2. Objectives
•Streamlineand facilitatethe processof unstructureddata acquisition
•Createand manage corpora’sfor contextualopinions and sentiments
•Detecttrends basedon contexctualreviews, comments, discussions…
•Runand train modelsfor sentiment or opinion analysis
•ProvideFigures, resultsand graphs as outputs
3. Software components
•Python
–Program language
•Django : Web application container
•Scapy: Web Crawler
•Librairies : Twitter,
•MySQL / MongoDB/ Hbase
–For the time being, no absolutechoiceismade But the final solution couldbea mix of differentdatabasesdependingon the nature of the use.
•R Project
–R Project willbeusedwheneverspecifictextmininglibrariesare missingin python or itbecomeeasierto use R insteadof python. In thatcase, the R scripts willbeencapsulatedin python programs.
•Hadoop
–For massive storagewewilluse Hadoop. The architecture isnot yetdepicted.
–It isusedfor Rawdata storage.
5. Architecture components
1
Data sources : The accesswillbemanagedvia API or Crawls. Sources are all onesrelatedto social media -> blogs, forums, advisors, social web… In general, all media wheresentiment / opinion are expressed.
2
Web Interface to interactwiththe system -> to manage inputs, configurations, outputs…
3
There willbea mix betweenScrapy(the Crawler) and python scripts for usingAPIs. Basically, the enginewillbeusedto gatherall data sources and store themfor furtherprocessing(pre- processingand analysis).
4
There willbea mix betweenScrapy(the Crawler) and python scripts for usingAPIs. Basically, the enginewillbeusedto gatherall data sources and store themfor furtherprocessing.
5
The targetdatabasesolution isnot yetselected. The objective isto store all the relative content wheneverisrawdata, configuration items or ouputresults.
6. Characteristicsof Sentiment Analysis
Sentiment = Holder + Polarity + Target + Auxiliary
–Holder: who expresses the sentiment
–Target: what/whom the sentiment is expressed to
–Polarity: the nature of the sentiment (e.g., positiveor negative)
“The games in iPhone 4s are pretty funny!”
Feature/Aspect Target Polarity : Positive
Holder = the user/reviewer
Auxiliary
•Strength : Differentiate the intensity
•Confidence : Measure the reliability of the sentiment
•Summary : Explain the reason inducing the sentiment
•Time
7. Basic Tasks
•Holderdetection –Find who express the sentiment
•Targetrecognition –Find whom/what the sentiment is expressed towards
•Sentiment (Polarity) classification –Positive, negative, neutral
•Opinion summarization
•Opinion spam detection
8. Subjectivityversus Sentiment
•Sentiment analysis also known as opinion mining.
•Attempts to identify the opinion/sentiment that a person may hold towards an object
•It is a finer grain analysis compared to subjectivity analysis
9. Lexicon Based Sentiment Classification
Basic idea
•Use the dominant polarity of the opinion words in the sentence to determine its polarity :
•If positive/negative opinion prevails, the opinion sentence is regarded as positive/negative
•Lexicon + Counting
•Lexicon + Grammar Rule + Inference Method
Example Lexicon :
http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~inquirer
http://www.cs.uic.edu/~liub/FBS/opinion-lexicon-English.rar
http://sentiwordnet.isti.cnr.it/
10. Sentiment AnalysisTasks
Level
TaskDescription
Document
•Task: sentiment classification of reviews
•Classes: positive, negative, and neutral
•Assumption: each document (or review) focuses on a single object (not true in many discussion posts) and contains opinion from a single opinion holder.
Sentence
•Task 1: identifying subjective/opinionated sentences
•Classes: objective and subjective (opinionated)
•Task 2: sentiment classification of sentences
•Classes: positive, negative and neutral.
•Assumption: a sentence contains only one opinion; not true in many cases.
•Then we can also consider clauses or phrases.
Feature
•Task 1: Identify and extract object features that have been commented on by an opinion holder (e.g., a reviewer).
•Task 2: Determine whether the opinions on the features are positive, negative or neutral.
•Task 3: Group feature synonyms.
•Produce a feature-based opinion summary of multiple reviews.
11. Sometools
Lexicon-based tools
•Use sentiment and subjectivity lexicons
•Rule-based classifier
•A sentence is subjective if it has at least two words in the lexicon
•A sentence is objective otherwise
Corpus-based tools
•Use corpora annotated for subjectivity and/or sentiment
•Train machine learning algorithms:
•Naïve bayes
•Decision trees
•SVM
•…
•Learn to automatically annotate new text
13. Sentiment Analysis: Holderdetection
Identifying Sources of Opinions with Conditional Random Fields and Extraction Patterns
International officers believe that the EU will prevail.
International officers said US officials want the EU to prevail.
•View source identification as an information extraction task and tackle the problem using sequence tagging and pattern matching techniques simultaneously
•Linear-chain CRF model to identify opinion sources
•Patterns incorporated as features
15. Sentiment Analysis: Twitter
1.Tweet normalization –A simple rule-based model –“gooood” to “good”, “luve” to “love”
2.POS tagging –OpenNLPPOS tagger
3.Word stemming –A word stem mapping table (about 20,000 entries)
4.Syntactic parsing –A Maximum Spanning Tree dependency parser
16. Crawlingscenario : Definition
Scenario x
Instance 1
Instance 2
Instance n
URLS sélectionnées
Paramètres de configuration
Name
Key words
…
•Scenario : 1 -> n : Category.
•Theme: n -> n : Scenario
•Scenario : 1 -> n : instance
•The scenario definethe type of Crawl wewantto run. It istiedto the notion of instance whichisconsideredas a specificconfiguration of scenario.
Module gestion des URLS
Module gestion de paramètres de configuration
Il faudra se pencher sur l’interface GUI en développement de Nutchet s’en inspirer pour la gestion des paramètres et des URLS.
Theme
Category