ICOAS2015
5THINTERNATIONALCONFERENCEONORGANICAGRICULTURESCIENCES,
14-17OCTOBER2015,BRATISLAVA –SLOVAKIA
Effect of Pre-crops, Cover crops and Manure
Application on Organic Potato Production in a
Field Experiment in eastern Austria
Tsolmon Nyamdavaa
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department
Sustainable Agricultural Systems
Material and Methods
• Trial site: Raasdorf (150 m above sea level,
9.8° C, 520 mm; Calcaric Phaeozem, silty
loam (2.2 % TOC, pH-7.6)
• Preceding crop species: Lucerne, field pea,
spring barley
• Soil amendments: cover crops, farmyard
manure
• Succeeding main crop: Potatoes (Ditta)
Material and Methods
Potato yield parameters: Soil parameters:
•Total fresh matter,
marketable, dry matter
yield
•Tuber size distribution,
external and internal
quality
•Water content
•Inorganic N availability
(NO3
- - N and NH4
+ - N)
(in March, up to 90 cm)
Statistical analysis: SPSS software (Version 18.0), ANOVA, Tukey’s
test (α = 0.05 / 0.01)
Results
• Soil Nmin content,
potato tuber yield
differed significanty
(P < 0.01) between
years
• No significant
effects by pre-crops
on tuber yield and
quality
Figure 1 Two-way interaction for soil NO3
- - N content
Legend: +CC: with cover crop, -CC without cover crop
• Four-way interaction
effect occured for
total tuber yield
• No clear benefits of
cover crops and
manure
• A positive significant
cover crop effect on
large sized tubers
only.
Results
Figure 2. Complete (pre-crop, cover crop. Manure and year)
interaction effect for tuber yield
Legend: +CC: with cover crop, -CC without cover crop
Conclusions
• Field pea can be increase the soil Nmin in silty loam
soil in unfavorable year
• Cover crops and manure not consistently enhance
potato tuber yield and quality in a high fertility soil.

Organic potato production

  • 1.
    ICOAS2015 5THINTERNATIONALCONFERENCEONORGANICAGRICULTURESCIENCES, 14-17OCTOBER2015,BRATISLAVA –SLOVAKIA Effect ofPre-crops, Cover crops and Manure Application on Organic Potato Production in a Field Experiment in eastern Austria Tsolmon Nyamdavaa University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department Sustainable Agricultural Systems
  • 2.
    Material and Methods •Trial site: Raasdorf (150 m above sea level, 9.8° C, 520 mm; Calcaric Phaeozem, silty loam (2.2 % TOC, pH-7.6) • Preceding crop species: Lucerne, field pea, spring barley • Soil amendments: cover crops, farmyard manure • Succeeding main crop: Potatoes (Ditta)
  • 3.
    Material and Methods Potatoyield parameters: Soil parameters: •Total fresh matter, marketable, dry matter yield •Tuber size distribution, external and internal quality •Water content •Inorganic N availability (NO3 - - N and NH4 + - N) (in March, up to 90 cm) Statistical analysis: SPSS software (Version 18.0), ANOVA, Tukey’s test (α = 0.05 / 0.01)
  • 4.
    Results • Soil Nmincontent, potato tuber yield differed significanty (P < 0.01) between years • No significant effects by pre-crops on tuber yield and quality Figure 1 Two-way interaction for soil NO3 - - N content Legend: +CC: with cover crop, -CC without cover crop
  • 5.
    • Four-way interaction effectoccured for total tuber yield • No clear benefits of cover crops and manure • A positive significant cover crop effect on large sized tubers only. Results Figure 2. Complete (pre-crop, cover crop. Manure and year) interaction effect for tuber yield Legend: +CC: with cover crop, -CC without cover crop
  • 6.
    Conclusions • Field peacan be increase the soil Nmin in silty loam soil in unfavorable year • Cover crops and manure not consistently enhance potato tuber yield and quality in a high fertility soil.