1. FINAL YEAR PROJECT
STUDENT MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
(USING AHP TECHNIQUE)
(PRESENTATION II)
NAME : MUHAMMAD HAZWAN BIN MOHD FUAD
MATRIC NO : BTCL16043362
SUBJECT : CSF35104 FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1
SUPERVISOR NAME : DR. SUHAILAN BIN SAFEI
3. FRMETHODOLOGY :
RAPID PROTOTYPING
1. Lower risk
• Can reduce the risk of costly errors.
• The development team can identify design faults or usability problems and make
any modifications quickly.
2. Easier visualization
• The ability to create helps developers present new product concepts to
stakeholders, such as board members, who need to understand and approve the
development program.
REASON WHY USE RAPID PROTOTYPING.
4. FRREASON WHY USE RAPID
PROTOTYPING (cont.)
3. Can reduce the risk of costly errors
• The development team can identify design faults or usability problems and make
any modifications quickly.
4. Support for customization
• Customization can provide a strong competitive advantage by offering customers
greater choice and flexibility
7. FRTECHNIQUE USED :
ANALYTHIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
• AHP considers a set of evaluation criteria, and a set of alternative options among
which the best decision is to be made.
• AHP generates a weight for each evaluation criterion according to the decision
maker’s pairwise comparisons of the criteria. The higher the weight, the more
important the corresponding criterion.
9. FR
WHERE TO USE AHP?
• The problem now is we don’t have the way to sort the student according to the
lecturers.
• For this situation, we use AHP to determine the best student to choose based on
their academic result.
CGPA Weightage
(W)
3.50 > 4.00 0.65
3.00 > 3.49 0.25
< 3.00 0.10
Supervisor Student 1 Student 2 Student 3
Supervisor
A
3.67 3.33 2.89
Supervisor
B
3.85 3.45 2.76
Name CGPA W
Name 1 3.33 0.25
Name 2 3.67 0.65
Name 3 3.85 0.65
Name 4 2.89 0.10
Name 5 2.76 0.10
Name 6 3.45 0.25
“Assume all student are in same course”
Supervisor A
Weightage =0.65 + 0.25 +0.10
W=1
The idea of rapid prototyping as it applies to instructional design, is to develop learning experiences in a continual design-evaluation cycle that continues throughout the life of the project.
This cycle, known as the spiral cycle or layered approach, is considered to be iterative, meaning that products are continually improved as the cycle continues