SlideShare a Scribd company logo
INFO for NACADA
 Beth Yarbrough, Auburn University
 Are We Singing the Same Song?
Rethinking the Prescriptive/Developmental
Continuum
 Code 105
 2012 NACADA Annual Conference
 yarbrel@auburn.edu
 334.844.5744
ARE WE SINGING THE SAME SONG?
RETHINKING THE
PRESCRIPTIVE/DEVELOPMENTAL CONTINUUM
Beth Yarbrough
Introduction
 Two major styles of advising have been
proposed: prescriptive and developmental.
 Prescriptive advising is a behavioral approach,
based on “telling” the student what to do. The
student is told what to do and expected to follow
the advice
 Developmental advising is based on a more
holistic view of the student and uses student
developmental theories as a foundation.
Advisors and students work together to develop
goals, plans, and actions.
Existing Measures of
Preference
 Academic Advising Inventory (Winston & Sandor, 1984)
measures preference for prescriptive/developmental
advising along a single continuum. Students cannot prefer
both styles simultaneously.
 Answers toward the left reflect increasing preference for
prescriptive advising, while answers toward the right reflect
increasing preference for developmental advising.
2. My advisor tells me what would
be the best schedule for me.
O
R
My advisor suggests important
considerations in planning a
schedule and then gives me
responsibility for the final decision.
Very
Important
Slightly
Important
Slightly
Important
Very
Important
Preference for Prescriptive
Advising?
 Although developmental advising is widely
preferred over prescriptive styles, research
indicates that students do not necessarily feel the
same way. Smith (2002) found that younger
students expressed a preference for prescriptive
advising.
 WHY?
 Are they “on-demand” type people? Just give me what
I want and let me go?
 Have their parents made all the decisions and they
don’t know how?
 Do some students simply need more direction?
Situational Leadership
 Hersey and Blanchard’s (1988) Situational
Leadership Theory argues for two types of
leadership, task and relational. These are not
considered a continuum, but two separate
dimensions.
 The amount of these dimensions of leadership
needed by an employee depends on the
employee readiness to perform a task.
 Readiness is defined as:
 Ability (knowledge, experience, skills)
 Willingness (confidence, commitment, motivation)
SLT Applied to Advising
 Parallels can be drawn to students as
“employees” and advisors as “leaders”.
 We are attempting to help students adjust to a
new set of tasks, responsibilities, and
expectations. We are here to guide students into
a successful working relationship with the
university.
 Student’s readiness to address the tasks before
them may define the types of help they need from
their advisors. Students with low readiness will
likely struggle with new responsibilities and
students with high readiness may not need an
advisor’s help at all.
Readiness as Related to
Leadership Needs
 The less ready (ability and willingness) someone is the greater their
need for task-direction.
 Think about your first 6 weeks as an advisor. Just the facts, ma’am.
 As people become more ready, they still need task-direction, but begin
to need relational-direction as well.
 Now you know more answers, but need help with relationships – who are the
go-to contacts, who can get help get things done
 People who are even more ready begin needing less task-direction, but
relational needs increase.
 You know the answers unless it’s really unusual or complex. How do you take
on more responsibility, develop your leadership skills, understand and
navigate office/university politics
 People who are very ready need little direction of any kind. They can
work independently almost indefinitely.
 I got this.
THE CHART! (Proposed)
Freshmen
(Low Readiness)
High Task, Low Relational
Sophomores
(Mid-Low Readiness)
High Task, High
Relational
Seniors
(High Readiness)
Low Task, Low Relational
Juniors
(Mid-High Readiness)
Low Task, High Relational
Task
Relational
The Purpose
 The current measurement of advising
preference is a continuum, but there may
actually be 2 dimensions to advising style
preference– task and relational.
 The current measurement (AAI) does not allow
a student to express preference for both
prescriptive and developmental styles
simultaneously.
 This study attempted to investigate whether the
AAI is an appropriate measure of advising style
Method
 Research question:
 Is the currently accepted measurement of
prescriptive/developmental advising as a continuum
appropriate?
 Cross-sectional survey methodology
 Sample of 119 undergraduates enrolled in Public Speaking
 Instruments
 Academic Advising Inventory, existing instrument
 Prescriptive/Developmental scale, developed by the
researcher
 Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were conducted
for the prescriptive/developmental scale, as well as reliability
measures on all scales.
Development of
Prescriptive/Developmental Scale
 Scale items were developed by the researcher and
given to experts in the field for feedback, confirmation of
developmental or prescriptive nature, and suggestions
for additional items.
 Changes were made based on expert feedback and the
resulting items were given to advisors to rate as
prescriptive or developmental in nature. Items which
were not unanimously categorized were eliminated.
 The final scale is 16 items, 8 testing prescriptive
preference and 8 testing developmental preference.
Example Questions from P/D
Scale
Strongly
Agree
Agree Neither
Agree nor
Disagree
Disagree Strongly
Disagree
1. My ideal advisor would tell
me what to do. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
2. My ideal advisor would tell
me which classes I should
take.
○ ○ ○ ○ ○
3. My ideal advisor would talk
to me about career
opportunities.
○ ○ ○ ○ ○
4. My ideal advisor would be
interested in my life outside
of school.
○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Confirmatory Factor Analysis:
Model 1
Developmental
pd3
e1
.31
pd4
e2
.46
pd5
e3
.32
pd8
e4
.63
pd9
e5
.70
pd12
e6
.62
pd15
e7
.44
pd16
e8
.51
Prescriptive
pd14
e9
.83
pd13
e10
.76
pd11
e11
-.12
pd10
e12
.37
pd7
e13
.14
pd6
e14
.41
pd2
e15
.04
pd1
e16
.03
.64
Chi Square: 278.6
CFI: .569
RMSEA: .120
Confirmatory Factor Analysis:
Model 2
Developmental
pd3
e1
.31
pd4
e2
.45
pd5
e3
.32
pd8
e4
.63
pd9
e5
.70
pd12
e6
.62
pd15
e7
.44
Prescriptive
pd14
e8
.86
pd13
e9
.75
pd10
e10
.36
pd6
e11
.42
.62
pd16
e12
.51
Chi Square: 110.83
CFI: .810
RMSEA: .097
Mysteries…
 Why did 4 prescriptive items not load?
 1, 2, 7, 11 all loaded poorly on prescriptive scale.
 My ideal advisor would tell me what to do.
 My ideal advisor would tell me which classes I should take.
 My ideal advisor would plan my schedules for me.
 My ideal advisor and I would only talk about academics.
 Mysterious Number 9: My ideal advisor would talk to
me about my interests and abilities to help me plan
classes.
 9 is developmental in nature, but data analysis indicated a
correlation with the prescriptive scale.
 Inclusion in both scales makes the model fit better than
including it in either single scale or eliminating it.
Mysterious Number 9: Model 3
Developmental
pd3
e1
.29
pd4
e2
.49
pd5
e3
.36
pd8
e4
.64
pd9
e5
.43
pd12
e6
.62
pd15
e7
.48
Prescriptive
pd14
e8
.84
pd13
e9
.76
pd10
e10
.35
pd6
e11
.42
pd16
e12
.55
.50
.38
Chi Square: 98.76
CFI: .846
RMSEA: .088
Exploratory Factor Analysis
 Results from CFA indicate that my interpretation of the
scale is not a great fit with the way students
answered.
 An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to see
what factors are a better fit for the way students
answered.
 A five-factor solution resulted from the EFA.
 These factors are more focused on the advising
situation or need of the student, rather than the style
of the advisor.
Five Factors
 Practical Advising: Rules and Requirements
 My ideal advisor would tell me about policies that may affect me.
 …would talk to me about my interests and abilities to help me
plan classes
 …would tell me about important deadlines
 Directive Advising
 …would tell me what to do
 …would tell me which classes I should take
 Skill Development
 …would help me with study skills and time management
 …would teach me how to make decisions for myself
Five Factors, Cont.
 Holisitic Advising
 …would be interested in my life outside of school
 …would talk only about academics
 Long Range Planning
 …would talk to me about career opportunities
 …would talk with me about my goals
 Students seem to focus on the advising situation or
their advising need, rather than any style or approach
that their advisor takes. This indicates that a more
complex approach to examining advising preferences
is warranted.
Where Do We Go Next?
 Students do score highly on both prescriptive and
developmental scales which the AAI does not
allow. If we plan to continue to talk about
prescriptive or developmental styles, the AAI may
not be the most appropriate measure.
 Do we want (as a field) to continue to talk about
these styles?
 Additional study of advising style preferences –
particularly as related to advising situation or
function. Does preference change with a change
in advising situation?
References
 Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1988).
Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing
Human Resources. Englewood, N.J.: Prentice-
Hall.
 Smith, J. S. (2002). First-year student perceptions
of academic advisement: A qualitative study and
reality check. NACADA Journal, 22(2), 39-49.
 Winston, R. B., & Sandor, J. A. (1984). The
Academic Advising Inventory. Athens, GA:
Student Development Associates.

More Related Content

Similar to Prescriptive Advising

Running head INITIAL REFLECTIONMays1INITIAL REFLECTIONMay.docx
Running head INITIAL REFLECTIONMays1INITIAL REFLECTIONMay.docxRunning head INITIAL REFLECTIONMays1INITIAL REFLECTIONMay.docx
Running head INITIAL REFLECTIONMays1INITIAL REFLECTIONMay.docx
cowinhelen
 
The Individual Development Plan for Postdoctoral Professional Development
The Individual Development Plan for Postdoctoral Professional DevelopmentThe Individual Development Plan for Postdoctoral Professional Development
The Individual Development Plan for Postdoctoral Professional Development
authors boards
 
Dispositions Self-Assessment SurveyFor each of the followi
Dispositions Self-Assessment SurveyFor each of the followiDispositions Self-Assessment SurveyFor each of the followi
Dispositions Self-Assessment SurveyFor each of the followi
DustiBuckner14
 
A Student Affairs Career Resource
A Student Affairs Career ResourceA Student Affairs Career Resource
A Student Affairs Career Resource
Quest Coaching
 
Ev681 session3 planning
Ev681 session3 planningEv681 session3 planning
Ev681 session3 planning
Pippa Totraku
 
MCEEA: PREPping Students for Success
MCEEA: PREPping Students for SuccessMCEEA: PREPping Students for Success
MCEEA: PREPping Students for Success
Paul Artale
 
Planning With the End in Mind
Planning With the End in Mind Planning With the End in Mind
Planning With the End in Mind
Jonathan Vervaet
 
Guidance & counseling
Guidance & counselingGuidance & counseling
Guidance & counseling
Viki Patidar
 
Career counselling
Career counsellingCareer counselling
Career counselling
JAYABARANWAL
 
MCDP
MCDP MCDP
My Ten Years” ExerciseProject yourself into the future .docx
My Ten Years” ExerciseProject yourself into the future .docxMy Ten Years” ExerciseProject yourself into the future .docx
My Ten Years” ExerciseProject yourself into the future .docx
roushhsiu
 
Guidance and Counseling
Guidance and CounselingGuidance and Counseling
Guidance and Counseling
Amit Newton
 
Training in Industry
Training in IndustryTraining in Industry
Training in IndustryParas Kaushik
 
Incept Education Dialogues
Incept Education DialoguesIncept Education Dialogues
Incept Education Dialogues
AdamUsher4972
 
MCDP-PPT-Deck.pptx
MCDP-PPT-Deck.pptxMCDP-PPT-Deck.pptx
MCDP-PPT-Deck.pptx
Bembem Clarin
 
Kahn mentoring for success3 2009
Kahn mentoring for success3 2009Kahn mentoring for success3 2009
Kahn mentoring for success3 2009James Kahn
 
Dunn & HalonenThe PsychologyMajor’s CompanionChapter 6 Ch
Dunn & HalonenThe PsychologyMajor’s CompanionChapter 6 ChDunn & HalonenThe PsychologyMajor’s CompanionChapter 6 Ch
Dunn & HalonenThe PsychologyMajor’s CompanionChapter 6 Ch
AlyciaGold776
 
TitleABC123 Version X1Introduction to Behavioral Scie.docx
TitleABC123 Version X1Introduction to Behavioral Scie.docxTitleABC123 Version X1Introduction to Behavioral Scie.docx
TitleABC123 Version X1Introduction to Behavioral Scie.docx
herthalearmont
 

Similar to Prescriptive Advising (20)

Running head INITIAL REFLECTIONMays1INITIAL REFLECTIONMay.docx
Running head INITIAL REFLECTIONMays1INITIAL REFLECTIONMay.docxRunning head INITIAL REFLECTIONMays1INITIAL REFLECTIONMay.docx
Running head INITIAL REFLECTIONMays1INITIAL REFLECTIONMay.docx
 
The Individual Development Plan for Postdoctoral Professional Development
The Individual Development Plan for Postdoctoral Professional DevelopmentThe Individual Development Plan for Postdoctoral Professional Development
The Individual Development Plan for Postdoctoral Professional Development
 
Dispositions Self-Assessment SurveyFor each of the followi
Dispositions Self-Assessment SurveyFor each of the followiDispositions Self-Assessment SurveyFor each of the followi
Dispositions Self-Assessment SurveyFor each of the followi
 
An example IDP
An example IDPAn example IDP
An example IDP
 
A Student Affairs Career Resource
A Student Affairs Career ResourceA Student Affairs Career Resource
A Student Affairs Career Resource
 
Ev681 session3 planning
Ev681 session3 planningEv681 session3 planning
Ev681 session3 planning
 
Peer Mentoring Booklet 2016
Peer Mentoring Booklet 2016Peer Mentoring Booklet 2016
Peer Mentoring Booklet 2016
 
MCEEA: PREPping Students for Success
MCEEA: PREPping Students for SuccessMCEEA: PREPping Students for Success
MCEEA: PREPping Students for Success
 
Planning With the End in Mind
Planning With the End in Mind Planning With the End in Mind
Planning With the End in Mind
 
Guidance & counseling
Guidance & counselingGuidance & counseling
Guidance & counseling
 
Career counselling
Career counsellingCareer counselling
Career counselling
 
MCDP
MCDP MCDP
MCDP
 
My Ten Years” ExerciseProject yourself into the future .docx
My Ten Years” ExerciseProject yourself into the future .docxMy Ten Years” ExerciseProject yourself into the future .docx
My Ten Years” ExerciseProject yourself into the future .docx
 
Guidance and Counseling
Guidance and CounselingGuidance and Counseling
Guidance and Counseling
 
Training in Industry
Training in IndustryTraining in Industry
Training in Industry
 
Incept Education Dialogues
Incept Education DialoguesIncept Education Dialogues
Incept Education Dialogues
 
MCDP-PPT-Deck.pptx
MCDP-PPT-Deck.pptxMCDP-PPT-Deck.pptx
MCDP-PPT-Deck.pptx
 
Kahn mentoring for success3 2009
Kahn mentoring for success3 2009Kahn mentoring for success3 2009
Kahn mentoring for success3 2009
 
Dunn & HalonenThe PsychologyMajor’s CompanionChapter 6 Ch
Dunn & HalonenThe PsychologyMajor’s CompanionChapter 6 ChDunn & HalonenThe PsychologyMajor’s CompanionChapter 6 Ch
Dunn & HalonenThe PsychologyMajor’s CompanionChapter 6 Ch
 
TitleABC123 Version X1Introduction to Behavioral Scie.docx
TitleABC123 Version X1Introduction to Behavioral Scie.docxTitleABC123 Version X1Introduction to Behavioral Scie.docx
TitleABC123 Version X1Introduction to Behavioral Scie.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptxMARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
bennyroshan06
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
DeeptiGupta154
 
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
rosedainty
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
EugeneSaldivar
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
kaushalkr1407
 
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and ResearchDigital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Vikramjit Singh
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Jisc
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Tamralipta Mahavidyalaya
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
beazzy04
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
EverAndrsGuerraGuerr
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
JosvitaDsouza2
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
BhavyaRajput3
 
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement EssentialsIntroduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Excellence Foundation for South Sudan
 
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdfUnit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Anna Sz.
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Mohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
 
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer ServicePART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PedroFerreira53928
 
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonThe Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
Steve Thomason
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfUnit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
 
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptxMARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
Template Jadual Bertugas Kelas (Boleh Edit)
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
 
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and ResearchDigital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
 
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
 
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
 
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement EssentialsIntroduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
 
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdfUnit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
 
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech RepublicPolish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
 
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer ServicePART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
PART A. Introduction to Costumer Service
 
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonThe Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve Thomason
 

Prescriptive Advising

  • 1. INFO for NACADA  Beth Yarbrough, Auburn University  Are We Singing the Same Song? Rethinking the Prescriptive/Developmental Continuum  Code 105  2012 NACADA Annual Conference  yarbrel@auburn.edu  334.844.5744
  • 2. ARE WE SINGING THE SAME SONG? RETHINKING THE PRESCRIPTIVE/DEVELOPMENTAL CONTINUUM Beth Yarbrough
  • 3. Introduction  Two major styles of advising have been proposed: prescriptive and developmental.  Prescriptive advising is a behavioral approach, based on “telling” the student what to do. The student is told what to do and expected to follow the advice  Developmental advising is based on a more holistic view of the student and uses student developmental theories as a foundation. Advisors and students work together to develop goals, plans, and actions.
  • 4. Existing Measures of Preference  Academic Advising Inventory (Winston & Sandor, 1984) measures preference for prescriptive/developmental advising along a single continuum. Students cannot prefer both styles simultaneously.  Answers toward the left reflect increasing preference for prescriptive advising, while answers toward the right reflect increasing preference for developmental advising. 2. My advisor tells me what would be the best schedule for me. O R My advisor suggests important considerations in planning a schedule and then gives me responsibility for the final decision. Very Important Slightly Important Slightly Important Very Important
  • 5. Preference for Prescriptive Advising?  Although developmental advising is widely preferred over prescriptive styles, research indicates that students do not necessarily feel the same way. Smith (2002) found that younger students expressed a preference for prescriptive advising.  WHY?  Are they “on-demand” type people? Just give me what I want and let me go?  Have their parents made all the decisions and they don’t know how?  Do some students simply need more direction?
  • 6. Situational Leadership  Hersey and Blanchard’s (1988) Situational Leadership Theory argues for two types of leadership, task and relational. These are not considered a continuum, but two separate dimensions.  The amount of these dimensions of leadership needed by an employee depends on the employee readiness to perform a task.  Readiness is defined as:  Ability (knowledge, experience, skills)  Willingness (confidence, commitment, motivation)
  • 7. SLT Applied to Advising  Parallels can be drawn to students as “employees” and advisors as “leaders”.  We are attempting to help students adjust to a new set of tasks, responsibilities, and expectations. We are here to guide students into a successful working relationship with the university.  Student’s readiness to address the tasks before them may define the types of help they need from their advisors. Students with low readiness will likely struggle with new responsibilities and students with high readiness may not need an advisor’s help at all.
  • 8. Readiness as Related to Leadership Needs  The less ready (ability and willingness) someone is the greater their need for task-direction.  Think about your first 6 weeks as an advisor. Just the facts, ma’am.  As people become more ready, they still need task-direction, but begin to need relational-direction as well.  Now you know more answers, but need help with relationships – who are the go-to contacts, who can get help get things done  People who are even more ready begin needing less task-direction, but relational needs increase.  You know the answers unless it’s really unusual or complex. How do you take on more responsibility, develop your leadership skills, understand and navigate office/university politics  People who are very ready need little direction of any kind. They can work independently almost indefinitely.  I got this.
  • 9. THE CHART! (Proposed) Freshmen (Low Readiness) High Task, Low Relational Sophomores (Mid-Low Readiness) High Task, High Relational Seniors (High Readiness) Low Task, Low Relational Juniors (Mid-High Readiness) Low Task, High Relational Task Relational
  • 10. The Purpose  The current measurement of advising preference is a continuum, but there may actually be 2 dimensions to advising style preference– task and relational.  The current measurement (AAI) does not allow a student to express preference for both prescriptive and developmental styles simultaneously.  This study attempted to investigate whether the AAI is an appropriate measure of advising style
  • 11. Method  Research question:  Is the currently accepted measurement of prescriptive/developmental advising as a continuum appropriate?  Cross-sectional survey methodology  Sample of 119 undergraduates enrolled in Public Speaking  Instruments  Academic Advising Inventory, existing instrument  Prescriptive/Developmental scale, developed by the researcher  Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were conducted for the prescriptive/developmental scale, as well as reliability measures on all scales.
  • 12. Development of Prescriptive/Developmental Scale  Scale items were developed by the researcher and given to experts in the field for feedback, confirmation of developmental or prescriptive nature, and suggestions for additional items.  Changes were made based on expert feedback and the resulting items were given to advisors to rate as prescriptive or developmental in nature. Items which were not unanimously categorized were eliminated.  The final scale is 16 items, 8 testing prescriptive preference and 8 testing developmental preference.
  • 13. Example Questions from P/D Scale Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree 1. My ideal advisor would tell me what to do. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 2. My ideal advisor would tell me which classes I should take. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 3. My ideal advisor would talk to me about career opportunities. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 4. My ideal advisor would be interested in my life outside of school. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
  • 14. Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Model 1 Developmental pd3 e1 .31 pd4 e2 .46 pd5 e3 .32 pd8 e4 .63 pd9 e5 .70 pd12 e6 .62 pd15 e7 .44 pd16 e8 .51 Prescriptive pd14 e9 .83 pd13 e10 .76 pd11 e11 -.12 pd10 e12 .37 pd7 e13 .14 pd6 e14 .41 pd2 e15 .04 pd1 e16 .03 .64 Chi Square: 278.6 CFI: .569 RMSEA: .120
  • 15. Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Model 2 Developmental pd3 e1 .31 pd4 e2 .45 pd5 e3 .32 pd8 e4 .63 pd9 e5 .70 pd12 e6 .62 pd15 e7 .44 Prescriptive pd14 e8 .86 pd13 e9 .75 pd10 e10 .36 pd6 e11 .42 .62 pd16 e12 .51 Chi Square: 110.83 CFI: .810 RMSEA: .097
  • 16. Mysteries…  Why did 4 prescriptive items not load?  1, 2, 7, 11 all loaded poorly on prescriptive scale.  My ideal advisor would tell me what to do.  My ideal advisor would tell me which classes I should take.  My ideal advisor would plan my schedules for me.  My ideal advisor and I would only talk about academics.  Mysterious Number 9: My ideal advisor would talk to me about my interests and abilities to help me plan classes.  9 is developmental in nature, but data analysis indicated a correlation with the prescriptive scale.  Inclusion in both scales makes the model fit better than including it in either single scale or eliminating it.
  • 17. Mysterious Number 9: Model 3 Developmental pd3 e1 .29 pd4 e2 .49 pd5 e3 .36 pd8 e4 .64 pd9 e5 .43 pd12 e6 .62 pd15 e7 .48 Prescriptive pd14 e8 .84 pd13 e9 .76 pd10 e10 .35 pd6 e11 .42 pd16 e12 .55 .50 .38 Chi Square: 98.76 CFI: .846 RMSEA: .088
  • 18. Exploratory Factor Analysis  Results from CFA indicate that my interpretation of the scale is not a great fit with the way students answered.  An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to see what factors are a better fit for the way students answered.  A five-factor solution resulted from the EFA.  These factors are more focused on the advising situation or need of the student, rather than the style of the advisor.
  • 19. Five Factors  Practical Advising: Rules and Requirements  My ideal advisor would tell me about policies that may affect me.  …would talk to me about my interests and abilities to help me plan classes  …would tell me about important deadlines  Directive Advising  …would tell me what to do  …would tell me which classes I should take  Skill Development  …would help me with study skills and time management  …would teach me how to make decisions for myself
  • 20. Five Factors, Cont.  Holisitic Advising  …would be interested in my life outside of school  …would talk only about academics  Long Range Planning  …would talk to me about career opportunities  …would talk with me about my goals  Students seem to focus on the advising situation or their advising need, rather than any style or approach that their advisor takes. This indicates that a more complex approach to examining advising preferences is warranted.
  • 21. Where Do We Go Next?  Students do score highly on both prescriptive and developmental scales which the AAI does not allow. If we plan to continue to talk about prescriptive or developmental styles, the AAI may not be the most appropriate measure.  Do we want (as a field) to continue to talk about these styles?  Additional study of advising style preferences – particularly as related to advising situation or function. Does preference change with a change in advising situation?
  • 22. References  Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources. Englewood, N.J.: Prentice- Hall.  Smith, J. S. (2002). First-year student perceptions of academic advisement: A qualitative study and reality check. NACADA Journal, 22(2), 39-49.  Winston, R. B., & Sandor, J. A. (1984). The Academic Advising Inventory. Athens, GA: Student Development Associates.