The document outlines the agenda and results of the final session of Pilot Project 1 (PP1). Key highlights include: - 10 students, 6 professors, and 6 employees participated in PP1 activities over 4 months. - 5 new lectures on ergonomics topics were delivered to students. - Students presented on work analyses and ergonomic evaluations they conducted. - Surveys were administered to collect feedback, with overall high satisfaction rates reported. - Certificates were awarded to conclude the session.

1. PILOT PROJECT 1 (PP 1)
Final session – session 15
OZARA d.o.o., Ul. heroja Šaranoviča 27, Maribor
27.03.2015

2. Friday 27/3/2015
Location: OZARA d.o.o., Ul.h.Šaranoviča 27, 2000 Maribor
8.45 – 9.00: Welcome drink
9.00 – 9.30: Pilot Project 1 – reflections
 Overview of PP1 activities through 4-month of its implementation (P1 – Nataša Rebernik)
 Students thoughts
9.30-10.30: Evaluation of Pilot Projects - WP5 and Teaching contents - WP3 (dr. Tomislav Rozman)
 Evaluation visits in Poland (PP3-PP6)– presentation
 Evaluation visits in Slovenia (PP1) – presentation
 Evaluation of PP1: SWOT analysis report – collection of ideas for Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities and Threats
 Evaluation of WP3: Curriculum Ergonomics – questionnaires for students
 Final Evaluator’s thoughts
10.30 – 11.00: Awarding of Certificates
11.00: Saying goodbye and INFORMAL GATHERING
AGENDA 27.03.2015

3. PP1 – Ključni indikatorji
• 10 vključenih študentov
• 6 vključenih profesorjev
• 4 vključeni zaposleni neinvalidi
• 2 vključena zaposlena invalida
• 5 predavanj
• 1 delovni proces (normiranje)
• 2 delovni mesti (ergonomija del.mesta)
• 1 delovno okolje (parametri del.okolja)
• 1 izdelek (ergonomija izdelka)
• 2 lokaciji (mobilnost)

4. PP1 – Rezultati dela
5 PREDAVANJ Z NOVIMI UČNIMI VSEBINAMI:
1. Osebe s posebnimi potrebami (prof.dr. Majda Schmidt-Krajnc)
2. Ergonomija in študij dela (doc.dr. Marjan Leber)
3. Univerzalno oblikovanje (prof.dr. Bojan Dolšak)
4. Mobilnost na delovnem mestu (prof.dr. Marjan Renčelj)
5. Ekonomika in ergonomija (prof.dr. Vojko Potočan)

5. PP1 – Rezultati dela
4 PREDSTAVITVE S STRANI ŠTUDENTOV:
1. PREDSTAVITEV: OWAS analiza del.mesta in del.okolja
• Ema Komar (doc.dr. Marjan Leber)
2. PREDSTAVITEV: NORMIRANJE dela in izboljšave
• Saša Stojko, Niko Rojko (doc.dr. Marjan Leber)
3. PREDSTAVITEV: NUMERIČNI PRERAČUN izdelka – les.palete
• Aleš Horvat (prof.dr. Bojan Dolšak)
4. PREDSTAVITEV: MOBILNOST na delovnem mestu
• Gregor Salobir, Aleksander Pagon, Rok Dolinšek, Aleš Petek
(prof.dr. Marjan Renčelj)

6. PP1 – Rezultati dela
4 PREDSTAVITVE S STRANI ŠTUDENTOV:
1. PREDSTAVITEV: OWAS analiza del.mesta in del.okolja
• Ema Komar (doc.dr. Marjan Leber)
2. PREDSTAVITEV: NORMIRANJE dela in izboljšave
• Saša Stojko, Niko Rojko (doc.dr. Marjan Leber)
3. PREDSTAVITEV: NUMERIČNI PRERAČUN izdelka – les.palete
• Aleš Horvat (prof.dr. Bojan Dolšak)
4. PREDSTAVITEV: MOBILNOST na delovnem mestu
• Gregor Salobir, Aleksander Pagon, Rok Dolinšek, Aleš Petek
(prof.dr. Marjan Renčelj)

7. OWAS analiza del.mesta in del.okolja
Ema Komar (doc.dr. Marjan Leber)

8. NORMIRANJE dela in izboljšave
Saša Stojko, Niko Rojko (doc.dr. Marjan Leber)

9. NUMERIČNI PRERAČUN izdelka
Aleš Horvat (prof.dr. Bojan Dolšak)

10. NUMERIČNI PRERAČUN izdelka
Aleš Horvat (prof.dr. Bojan Dolšak)

11. PREDSTAVITEV: MOBILNOST na
delovnem mestu
Gregor Salobir, Aleksander Pagon, Rok Dolinšek, Aleš
Petek (prof.dr. Marjan Renčelj)

13. EVALVACIJA in SAMOEVALVACIJA
PILOTNEGA PROJEKTA 1

14. • Questionnaire:
• Likert scale (1-5)
• Open text
• Sample:
• 10 (printed) per survey
• 3-5 (web) per survey
• 4 surveys
• Students, professors, project team members
The methodology
14

15. • Questions:
• Do you think the explanations during the
meeting were understandable?
• Do you think the participation in this pilot
project meeting was useful?
• Do you think the participation in this pilot
project meeting was practical?
• Do you think the pilot project meeting was
complete or did you miss anything?
• How would you rate your general
satisfaction with the pilot project event?
• Will you be able to apply the knowledge
you've gained within pilot project event?
• Have you learnt anything new?
• Would it help you accommodate people
with disabilities in the workplace?
• How well do you understand the concept
of ergonomic workplace design?
• On completion of pilot projects, how well
are you equipped, to solve specific issues
related to the needs of people with
disabilities?
Survey results
15
• How would you rate your satisfaction with the
trainer/presenter/guide?
• How would you rate your satisfaction with the
facilities?
• How would you rate your satisfaction with the
training materials (overall)?
• How would you rate your satisfaction with the
training material (TM1_Work study and
Ergonomics for PWD)?
• How would you rate your satisfaction with the
training material (TM2_Persons with disabilities)?
• How would you rate your satisfaction with the
training material (TM3_Ergonomics in business)?
• How would you rate your satisfaction with the
training material (TM4_Inclusive design)?
• How would you rate your satisfaction with the
training material (TM5_Mobility of PWD)?
• How would you rate your satisfaction with the
organization of the training?
• How would you rate your overall satisfaction with
the training?
• Would you recommend this pilot project to the
others?

16. • Draft (printed surveys only)
Results
160.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
Do you think the explanations during the meeting were understandable?
Do you think the participation in this pilot project meeting was useful?
Do you think the participation in this pilot project meeting was practical?
Do you think the pilot project meeting was complete or did you miss anything?
How would you rate your general satisfaction with the pilot project event?
Will you be able to apply the knowledge you've gained within pilot project event?
Have you learnt anything new?
Would it help you accommodate people with disabilities in the workplace?
How well do you understand the concept of ergonomic workplace design?
On completion of pilot projects, how well are you equipped, to solve specific issues related to…
How would you rate your satisfaction with the trainer/presenter/guide?
How would you rate your satisfaction with the facilities?
How would you rate your satisfaction with the training materials (overall)?
How would you rate your satisfaction with the training material (TM1_Work study and…
How would you rate your satisfaction with the training material (TM2_Persons with…
How would you rate your satisfaction with the training material (TM3_Ergonomics in business)?
How would you rate your satisfaction with the training material (TM4_Inclusive design)?
How would you rate your satisfaction with the training material (TM5_Mobility of PWD)?
How would you rate your satisfaction with the organization of the training?
How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the training?
Would you recommend this pilot project to the others?
Average
20.3.2015
13.3.2015

17. • Neposredna delovna izkušnja
• Možnost izdelave seminarske/diplomske/magistrske naloge (z
mentorjem v podjetju)
• Bonitete pri opravljanju obveznosti v okviru študijskega predmeta (v
dogovoru s profesorjem)
• Nova specifična znanja, ki jih v podjetjih manjka
• Referenca k življenjepisu
• Širjenje mreže potencialnih delodajalcev
Ali so Vaša pričakovanja izpolnjena v
zvezi s priložnostmi, ki smo Vam jih
predstavili ob pričetku PP1?

20. Hvala za pozornost!
natasa.rebernik@ozara.si
Izvedba tega projekta je financirana s strani Evropske komisije.
Vsebina publikacije (komunikacije) je izključno odgovornost avtorja in v
nobenem primeru ne predstavlja stališč Evropske komisije.