SlideShare a Scribd company logo
SRCCpostertemplateprovidedbyInstructionalResourcesandOfficeofUndergraduateResearch
Rainfall/Snowmelt Event: Effect on Water Quality in Cayuga Creek Erie County, NY
Spencer Podsiadlo, Geography
Dr. Stephen Vermette, Department of Geography and Planning
Cayuga Creek is one of three tributaries emptying into the Buffalo River in Erie Country NY.
Cayuga Creek is the most northerly while the Buffalo Creek is further south and Cazenovia
Creek is the most southerly. The total drainage area of Cayuga Creek is about 92 square
miles and the creek is 40 miles long. Beginning in the west where Cayuga Creek flows into
the Buffalo River the watershed is mainly urban, as you move east and upstream you move
through the suburbs of Cheektowaga, Depew and Lancaster. Further east, slightly south and
further upstream you find a more rural and agricultural setting in the Towns of Marilla,
Bennington and Sheldon. There are parks and forested areas mixed in with the urban,
suburban and rural areas throughout the watershed.
Four sites were accessed along the creek to monitor water quality once every week or two, for
a total of ten samples per site from October 2014 to January 2015. The sections of the creek
sampled pass through several parks, as well as through the towns of Cheektowaga, Depew
and Lancaster. These sites are in proximity to varying amounts of vegetation and
urbanization.
Water quality parameters monitored included: E.coli, suspended solids, hardness, nitrate,
dissolved solids and pH, among others. Rainfall influences runoff into the creek and creek
flow, thus rainfall data was obtained from nearby gauges.
This poster focuses on rainfall/snowmelt events which occurred during the sampling period to
determine their impact on creek water quality. The specific question addressed in this poster
is to determine which water quality parameters are impacted by rainfall events and which are
not.
The Buffalo River has been classified as an Area of Concern, AOC. This classification lead to
the Buffalo River to be selected for the EPA's Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated
Sediments (ARCS) program. The Buffalo River is heavily influenced by contaminates from
upstream and this includes Cayuga Creek. Numerous contaminates such as PCB’s, DDT, lead
and copper are of concern. Industrial discharges, combined sewer overflows and suspension
of contaminated sediments are the suspected sources for these contaminants.
Introduction
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Weather Service Forecast Office Buffalo, NY.
http://www.weather.gov/climate/index.php?wfo=buf (accessed 2/2/15).
Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper. Buffalo River Watershed. http://bnriverkeeper.org/places/buffalo-river/
(accessed 4/18/15).
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments
(ARCS) Program. http://www.epa.gov/greatlakes/arcs/EPA-905-R94-005/EPA-905-R94-005.html
(accessed 4/20/15).
References
Conclusions
Sediments and turbidity were the most affected by rain. There seems to be some relationship between
rainfall and E.coli, as well as rainfall and pH but not a strong relationship. Hardness, nitrate and
dissolved solids had no relationship to rain and snowmelt. Dissolved oxygen and temperature although
not shown have a strong relationship to each other but not to rainfall or snowmelt.
Results and Discussion
Secchi depth is a measure of turbidity. A measurement of 24 inches is the maximum
and indicates that the water is very clear.
Sampling Site Locations
The rainfall that occurred on 1/3/14-1/4/14 was 1.1 inches. That was the most rain over the shortest
period of time. Over the same time period the highest average temperature of any snowmelt event
occurred. Taking into account snowmelt a potential total of 2.8 inches of water entered the stream
over two days. Suspended sediments increased by a large amount from 12/29/14 to 1/5/15. Turbidity
is a measurement of how clear the water is. When turbidity is close to 0, that will indicate that the
suspended solids measurements are likely to be high. This is an inverse relationship. So as expected
turbidity was low on 1/5/15 while suspended solids were high on that same date.
A pH of 7 is neutral. Higher than 7 is basic and lower than 7 is acidic.
An obvious drop in pH from 12/29/14 to 1/5/15 could be due to the fact that rain water tends to be
acidic. This assumption can be called into question by comparing site 4 on 10/29/15 to site 4 on
1/5/15. pH values are 7.9 and 7.8 respectively. 10/28/14 saw rainfall of 0.1 in while 1/3/15-1/4/15
saw 1.1 in of rain. Apart from this one instance the rain did not seem to affect pH.
Nitrate does not appear to be
affected by any rain event. The trend
continues to increase despite rainfall
events. For example between
11/5/14 and 11/12/14 only 0.02 in of
rain fell on 11/12/14. At three of the
four sites nitrate increased and if
0.02 in of rain caused the increase,
then why wouldn’t a rainfall total of
1.1 in on 1/3/15-1/4/15 result in a
significant increase in nitrate on
1/5/15?
E.coli is greatly affected by 0.63 inches of rain from 12/16/14 to 12/17/14. From 1/3/15 to 1/4/15 1.1 inches of
rain fell but this larger amount of rainfall has a mixed result. Site 1 is the furthest upstream with more influence
from the agricultural regions upstream. The main inputs would be from fecal matter of livestock. Site 3 is in the
middle of Lancaster, a suburban town. The E.coli is likely coming from both animal (dogs, cats, geese, etc) and
human fecal matter. More fecal matter was available at site 1 and 3 so the rainfall could have flushed more fecal
matter into the stream. Site 2 and 4 are in parks. Because they are parks, they lack human fecal matter inputs
which may have resulted in lower E.coli counts. In addition E.coli originating from any fecal matter on land
close to the stream may not be making it into the stream because increased amounts of vegetation at these sites
holds it in place. Depending on the density of the vegetation the water carrying the fecal matter may never make
it to the stream.
Hardness does not appear to be
affected by rain events. The
correlation between the sites is very
tight throughout the study except the
final sampling on 1/19/15 when
values spiked. A small amount of rain,
0.04 in fell on 1/18/15. There could
have been snowmelt and subsequently
runoff on 1/17/15-1/18/15 due to an
average temperature being 42.5°F and
ample snow present.
When the hardness values are subtracted
from the total dissolved solids values the
spike on 1/19/15 is much more visible.
This may be related to nitrate which on
1/5/15 was 0.5 ppm at all four sites, then
all sites increased to 1 ppm on 1/19/15.
The dissolved solids minus hardness
concentrations on 1/19/15 increase from
site 1 to 4, this is flowing downstream.
Some sort of nutrient was being added to
the water as it flowed downstream.
Whether or not these spikes is values
were caused by nitrate or some other
nutrient, such of phosphates, which were
not measured is unknown. What is know
is that these spikes could not have been
caused by rain. Why would there be a
reaction on 1/19/15 from the 0.04 in of
rain on 1/18/15 but nothing happened on
1/5/15 when 1.1 in of rain fell 1/3/15-
1/4/15?
The negative values were caused by human error. Those values are not correct.

More Related Content

What's hot

Eops 2016 09_26
Eops 2016 09_26Eops 2016 09_26
Eops 2016 09_26
EOPS EOPS
 
Ecological rainfall infrastructure: investment in trees for sustainable devel...
Ecological rainfall infrastructure: investment in trees for sustainable devel...Ecological rainfall infrastructure: investment in trees for sustainable devel...
Ecological rainfall infrastructure: investment in trees for sustainable devel...
World Agroforestry (ICRAF)
 
The Blob, El Nino and the Drought in Puget Sound
The Blob, El Nino and the Drought in Puget SoundThe Blob, El Nino and the Drought in Puget Sound
The Blob, El Nino and the Drought in Puget Sound
Nisqually River Council
 
Water Policy for Food Security, a global conference
Water Policy for Food Security, a global conferenceWater Policy for Food Security, a global conference
Water Policy for Food Security, a global conference
University of California, Davis
 
Eops 2015 8_4
Eops 2015 8_4Eops 2015 8_4
Eops 2015 8_4
Christopher Krembs
 
Squaxin Island Tribe presentation to CCA Capitol City
Squaxin Island Tribe presentation to CCA Capitol CitySquaxin Island Tribe presentation to CCA Capitol City
Squaxin Island Tribe presentation to CCA Capitol City
Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission
 
Eops 2015 9_21
Eops 2015 9_21Eops 2015 9_21
Eops 2015 9_21
Christopher Krembs
 
Groundwater Science 101, TAGD Leadership Training, September 2014: George Ozuna
Groundwater Science 101, TAGD Leadership Training, September 2014: George OzunaGroundwater Science 101, TAGD Leadership Training, September 2014: George Ozuna
Groundwater Science 101, TAGD Leadership Training, September 2014: George OzunaTexas Alliance of Groundwater Districts
 
Michal Kravcik, "The New Water Reality"
Michal Kravcik, "The New Water Reality"Michal Kravcik, "The New Water Reality"
Michal Kravcik, "The New Water Reality"
bio4climate
 
Eops 2015 12_30
Eops 2015 12_30Eops 2015 12_30
Eops 2015 12_30
EOPS EOPS
 
The societal value of historical and paleoflood research in Manitoba, Canada
The societal value of historical and paleoflood research in Manitoba, CanadaThe societal value of historical and paleoflood research in Manitoba, Canada
The societal value of historical and paleoflood research in Manitoba, Canada
Scott St. George
 
Eops 2016 07_20
Eops 2016 07_20Eops 2016 07_20
Eops 2016 07_20
EOPS EOPS
 
Climate Change & Urban Development Have Impacted Streamflows in Southern Ontario
Climate Change & Urban Development Have Impacted Streamflows in Southern OntarioClimate Change & Urban Development Have Impacted Streamflows in Southern Ontario
Climate Change & Urban Development Have Impacted Streamflows in Southern Ontario
Robert Muir
 
Unit 3. Water
Unit 3. WaterUnit 3. Water
Unit 3. Water
bego docencia
 
Eops 2017 7_24
Eops 2017 7_24Eops 2017 7_24
Eops 2017 7_24
EOPS EOPS
 
Andrew Schwarz, California Department of Water Resources
Andrew Schwarz, California Department of Water ResourcesAndrew Schwarz, California Department of Water Resources
Andrew Schwarz, California Department of Water Resources
University of California, Davis
 
Flooding 2 Causes
Flooding 2 CausesFlooding 2 Causes
Flooding 2 Causestudorgeog
 

What's hot (18)

Eops 2016 09_26
Eops 2016 09_26Eops 2016 09_26
Eops 2016 09_26
 
Ecological rainfall infrastructure: investment in trees for sustainable devel...
Ecological rainfall infrastructure: investment in trees for sustainable devel...Ecological rainfall infrastructure: investment in trees for sustainable devel...
Ecological rainfall infrastructure: investment in trees for sustainable devel...
 
The Blob, El Nino and the Drought in Puget Sound
The Blob, El Nino and the Drought in Puget SoundThe Blob, El Nino and the Drought in Puget Sound
The Blob, El Nino and the Drought in Puget Sound
 
Water Policy for Food Security, a global conference
Water Policy for Food Security, a global conferenceWater Policy for Food Security, a global conference
Water Policy for Food Security, a global conference
 
Eops 2015 8_4
Eops 2015 8_4Eops 2015 8_4
Eops 2015 8_4
 
Squaxin Island Tribe presentation to CCA Capitol City
Squaxin Island Tribe presentation to CCA Capitol CitySquaxin Island Tribe presentation to CCA Capitol City
Squaxin Island Tribe presentation to CCA Capitol City
 
The Lake Report 12/06/2012
The Lake Report 12/06/2012The Lake Report 12/06/2012
The Lake Report 12/06/2012
 
Eops 2015 9_21
Eops 2015 9_21Eops 2015 9_21
Eops 2015 9_21
 
Groundwater Science 101, TAGD Leadership Training, September 2014: George Ozuna
Groundwater Science 101, TAGD Leadership Training, September 2014: George OzunaGroundwater Science 101, TAGD Leadership Training, September 2014: George Ozuna
Groundwater Science 101, TAGD Leadership Training, September 2014: George Ozuna
 
Michal Kravcik, "The New Water Reality"
Michal Kravcik, "The New Water Reality"Michal Kravcik, "The New Water Reality"
Michal Kravcik, "The New Water Reality"
 
Eops 2015 12_30
Eops 2015 12_30Eops 2015 12_30
Eops 2015 12_30
 
The societal value of historical and paleoflood research in Manitoba, Canada
The societal value of historical and paleoflood research in Manitoba, CanadaThe societal value of historical and paleoflood research in Manitoba, Canada
The societal value of historical and paleoflood research in Manitoba, Canada
 
Eops 2016 07_20
Eops 2016 07_20Eops 2016 07_20
Eops 2016 07_20
 
Climate Change & Urban Development Have Impacted Streamflows in Southern Ontario
Climate Change & Urban Development Have Impacted Streamflows in Southern OntarioClimate Change & Urban Development Have Impacted Streamflows in Southern Ontario
Climate Change & Urban Development Have Impacted Streamflows in Southern Ontario
 
Unit 3. Water
Unit 3. WaterUnit 3. Water
Unit 3. Water
 
Eops 2017 7_24
Eops 2017 7_24Eops 2017 7_24
Eops 2017 7_24
 
Andrew Schwarz, California Department of Water Resources
Andrew Schwarz, California Department of Water ResourcesAndrew Schwarz, California Department of Water Resources
Andrew Schwarz, California Department of Water Resources
 
Flooding 2 Causes
Flooding 2 CausesFlooding 2 Causes
Flooding 2 Causes
 

Similar to Poster Presentation(new)

Internship Crystal Springs Preserve
Internship   Crystal Springs PreserveInternship   Crystal Springs Preserve
Internship Crystal Springs Preserve
University of Richmond - Environmental Studies
 
Watershed
WatershedWatershed
Watershed
gueste8a30b
 
EOPS_2020_03_16.pdf
EOPS_2020_03_16.pdfEOPS_2020_03_16.pdf
EOPS_2020_03_16.pdf
EOPS EOPS
 
Eops 2016 03_16
Eops 2016 03_16Eops 2016 03_16
Eops 2016 03_16
EOPS EOPS
 
Ash Creek/Rooster River Watershed
Ash Creek/Rooster River WatershedAsh Creek/Rooster River Watershed
Ash Creek/Rooster River Watershed
Ash Creek Conservation Assoc
 
Presentation 2011 spring freshet may19 rev2
Presentation   2011 spring freshet may19 rev2Presentation   2011 spring freshet may19 rev2
Presentation 2011 spring freshet may19 rev2DeltaChamber
 
Eops 2016 04_06
Eops 2016 04_06Eops 2016 04_06
Eops 2016 04_06
EOPS EOPS
 
EOPS_2020_09_28.pdf
EOPS_2020_09_28.pdfEOPS_2020_09_28.pdf
EOPS_2020_09_28.pdf
EOPS EOPS
 
Bituin
BituinBituin
Bituin
saklolo
 
EOPS_2018_11_06.pdf
EOPS_2018_11_06.pdfEOPS_2018_11_06.pdf
EOPS_2018_11_06.pdf
EOPS EOPS
 
WaterResourceResearchFinal
WaterResourceResearchFinalWaterResourceResearchFinal
WaterResourceResearchFinalAustin Woods
 
Droughts In Chad Essay
Droughts In Chad EssayDroughts In Chad Essay
Droughts In Chad Essay
Pay To Write Papers Dix Hills
 
WaterQualityReportCard1215152
WaterQualityReportCard1215152WaterQualityReportCard1215152
WaterQualityReportCard1215152Laura Kelm
 
Heal the Susquehanna
Heal the SusquehannaHeal the Susquehanna
Heal the Susquehanna
Stewards of the Lower Susquehanna
 
Rapidan river watershed assessment presentation john ndiritu 2014
Rapidan river watershed assessment presentation john ndiritu 2014Rapidan river watershed assessment presentation john ndiritu 2014
Rapidan river watershed assessment presentation john ndiritu 2014
johngn4
 
My presentation
My presentationMy presentation
My presentation
090793
 

Similar to Poster Presentation(new) (20)

Internship Crystal Springs Preserve
Internship   Crystal Springs PreserveInternship   Crystal Springs Preserve
Internship Crystal Springs Preserve
 
Watershed
WatershedWatershed
Watershed
 
EOPS_2020_03_16.pdf
EOPS_2020_03_16.pdfEOPS_2020_03_16.pdf
EOPS_2020_03_16.pdf
 
Eops 2016 03_16
Eops 2016 03_16Eops 2016 03_16
Eops 2016 03_16
 
Ash Creek/Rooster River Watershed
Ash Creek/Rooster River WatershedAsh Creek/Rooster River Watershed
Ash Creek/Rooster River Watershed
 
Presentation 2011 spring freshet may19 rev2
Presentation   2011 spring freshet may19 rev2Presentation   2011 spring freshet may19 rev2
Presentation 2011 spring freshet may19 rev2
 
Final poster[1]
Final poster[1]Final poster[1]
Final poster[1]
 
Eops 2016 04_06
Eops 2016 04_06Eops 2016 04_06
Eops 2016 04_06
 
EOPS_2020_09_28.pdf
EOPS_2020_09_28.pdfEOPS_2020_09_28.pdf
EOPS_2020_09_28.pdf
 
Jayric
JayricJayric
Jayric
 
Bituin
BituinBituin
Bituin
 
EOPS_2018_11_06.pdf
EOPS_2018_11_06.pdfEOPS_2018_11_06.pdf
EOPS_2018_11_06.pdf
 
WaterResourceResearchFinal
WaterResourceResearchFinalWaterResourceResearchFinal
WaterResourceResearchFinal
 
qld waterways 3
qld waterways 3qld waterways 3
qld waterways 3
 
Droughts In Chad Essay
Droughts In Chad EssayDroughts In Chad Essay
Droughts In Chad Essay
 
WaterQualityReportCard1215152
WaterQualityReportCard1215152WaterQualityReportCard1215152
WaterQualityReportCard1215152
 
Heal the Susquehanna
Heal the SusquehannaHeal the Susquehanna
Heal the Susquehanna
 
Rapidan river watershed assessment presentation john ndiritu 2014
Rapidan river watershed assessment presentation john ndiritu 2014Rapidan river watershed assessment presentation john ndiritu 2014
Rapidan river watershed assessment presentation john ndiritu 2014
 
My presentation
My presentationMy presentation
My presentation
 
Levy
LevyLevy
Levy
 

Poster Presentation(new)

  • 1. SRCCpostertemplateprovidedbyInstructionalResourcesandOfficeofUndergraduateResearch Rainfall/Snowmelt Event: Effect on Water Quality in Cayuga Creek Erie County, NY Spencer Podsiadlo, Geography Dr. Stephen Vermette, Department of Geography and Planning Cayuga Creek is one of three tributaries emptying into the Buffalo River in Erie Country NY. Cayuga Creek is the most northerly while the Buffalo Creek is further south and Cazenovia Creek is the most southerly. The total drainage area of Cayuga Creek is about 92 square miles and the creek is 40 miles long. Beginning in the west where Cayuga Creek flows into the Buffalo River the watershed is mainly urban, as you move east and upstream you move through the suburbs of Cheektowaga, Depew and Lancaster. Further east, slightly south and further upstream you find a more rural and agricultural setting in the Towns of Marilla, Bennington and Sheldon. There are parks and forested areas mixed in with the urban, suburban and rural areas throughout the watershed. Four sites were accessed along the creek to monitor water quality once every week or two, for a total of ten samples per site from October 2014 to January 2015. The sections of the creek sampled pass through several parks, as well as through the towns of Cheektowaga, Depew and Lancaster. These sites are in proximity to varying amounts of vegetation and urbanization. Water quality parameters monitored included: E.coli, suspended solids, hardness, nitrate, dissolved solids and pH, among others. Rainfall influences runoff into the creek and creek flow, thus rainfall data was obtained from nearby gauges. This poster focuses on rainfall/snowmelt events which occurred during the sampling period to determine their impact on creek water quality. The specific question addressed in this poster is to determine which water quality parameters are impacted by rainfall events and which are not. The Buffalo River has been classified as an Area of Concern, AOC. This classification lead to the Buffalo River to be selected for the EPA's Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (ARCS) program. The Buffalo River is heavily influenced by contaminates from upstream and this includes Cayuga Creek. Numerous contaminates such as PCB’s, DDT, lead and copper are of concern. Industrial discharges, combined sewer overflows and suspension of contaminated sediments are the suspected sources for these contaminants. Introduction National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Weather Service Forecast Office Buffalo, NY. http://www.weather.gov/climate/index.php?wfo=buf (accessed 2/2/15). Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper. Buffalo River Watershed. http://bnriverkeeper.org/places/buffalo-river/ (accessed 4/18/15). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (ARCS) Program. http://www.epa.gov/greatlakes/arcs/EPA-905-R94-005/EPA-905-R94-005.html (accessed 4/20/15). References Conclusions Sediments and turbidity were the most affected by rain. There seems to be some relationship between rainfall and E.coli, as well as rainfall and pH but not a strong relationship. Hardness, nitrate and dissolved solids had no relationship to rain and snowmelt. Dissolved oxygen and temperature although not shown have a strong relationship to each other but not to rainfall or snowmelt. Results and Discussion Secchi depth is a measure of turbidity. A measurement of 24 inches is the maximum and indicates that the water is very clear. Sampling Site Locations The rainfall that occurred on 1/3/14-1/4/14 was 1.1 inches. That was the most rain over the shortest period of time. Over the same time period the highest average temperature of any snowmelt event occurred. Taking into account snowmelt a potential total of 2.8 inches of water entered the stream over two days. Suspended sediments increased by a large amount from 12/29/14 to 1/5/15. Turbidity is a measurement of how clear the water is. When turbidity is close to 0, that will indicate that the suspended solids measurements are likely to be high. This is an inverse relationship. So as expected turbidity was low on 1/5/15 while suspended solids were high on that same date. A pH of 7 is neutral. Higher than 7 is basic and lower than 7 is acidic. An obvious drop in pH from 12/29/14 to 1/5/15 could be due to the fact that rain water tends to be acidic. This assumption can be called into question by comparing site 4 on 10/29/15 to site 4 on 1/5/15. pH values are 7.9 and 7.8 respectively. 10/28/14 saw rainfall of 0.1 in while 1/3/15-1/4/15 saw 1.1 in of rain. Apart from this one instance the rain did not seem to affect pH. Nitrate does not appear to be affected by any rain event. The trend continues to increase despite rainfall events. For example between 11/5/14 and 11/12/14 only 0.02 in of rain fell on 11/12/14. At three of the four sites nitrate increased and if 0.02 in of rain caused the increase, then why wouldn’t a rainfall total of 1.1 in on 1/3/15-1/4/15 result in a significant increase in nitrate on 1/5/15? E.coli is greatly affected by 0.63 inches of rain from 12/16/14 to 12/17/14. From 1/3/15 to 1/4/15 1.1 inches of rain fell but this larger amount of rainfall has a mixed result. Site 1 is the furthest upstream with more influence from the agricultural regions upstream. The main inputs would be from fecal matter of livestock. Site 3 is in the middle of Lancaster, a suburban town. The E.coli is likely coming from both animal (dogs, cats, geese, etc) and human fecal matter. More fecal matter was available at site 1 and 3 so the rainfall could have flushed more fecal matter into the stream. Site 2 and 4 are in parks. Because they are parks, they lack human fecal matter inputs which may have resulted in lower E.coli counts. In addition E.coli originating from any fecal matter on land close to the stream may not be making it into the stream because increased amounts of vegetation at these sites holds it in place. Depending on the density of the vegetation the water carrying the fecal matter may never make it to the stream. Hardness does not appear to be affected by rain events. The correlation between the sites is very tight throughout the study except the final sampling on 1/19/15 when values spiked. A small amount of rain, 0.04 in fell on 1/18/15. There could have been snowmelt and subsequently runoff on 1/17/15-1/18/15 due to an average temperature being 42.5°F and ample snow present. When the hardness values are subtracted from the total dissolved solids values the spike on 1/19/15 is much more visible. This may be related to nitrate which on 1/5/15 was 0.5 ppm at all four sites, then all sites increased to 1 ppm on 1/19/15. The dissolved solids minus hardness concentrations on 1/19/15 increase from site 1 to 4, this is flowing downstream. Some sort of nutrient was being added to the water as it flowed downstream. Whether or not these spikes is values were caused by nitrate or some other nutrient, such of phosphates, which were not measured is unknown. What is know is that these spikes could not have been caused by rain. Why would there be a reaction on 1/19/15 from the 0.04 in of rain on 1/18/15 but nothing happened on 1/5/15 when 1.1 in of rain fell 1/3/15- 1/4/15? The negative values were caused by human error. Those values are not correct.