Dr. Wilton Littlechild addresses the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues regarding the upcoming World Conference on Indigenous Peoples. He thanks those who supported the conference and recognizes the progress made since initial discussions in 1977. However, he notes that challenges remain in realizing the objectives of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. He calls for actions to advance self-determination, including appointing an Indigenous co-chair for the conference, ensuring Indigenous participation at all stages, and establishing a third International Decade with a theme of "Action on Self-Determination."
Abstract:
The Responsibility to Protect (R2P or RtoP) is a global political commitment which was endorsed by all member states of the United Nations at the 2005 World Summit to prevent genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity The principle of the Responsibility to Protect is based upon the underlying premise that sovereignty entails a responsibility to protect all populations from mass atrocity crimes and human rights violations. The principle is based on a respect for the norms and principles of international law, especially the underlying principles of law relating to sovereignty, peace and security, human rights, and armed conflict. The Responsibility to Protect provides a framework for employing measures that already exist (i.e., mediation, early warning mechanisms, economic sanctions, and chapter VII powers) to prevent atrocity crimes and to protect civilians from their occurrence. The authority to employ the use of force under the framework of the Responsibility to Protect rests solely with United Nations Security Council and is considered a measure of last resort. The United Nations Secretary-General has published annual reports on the Responsibility to Protect since 2009 that expand on the measures available to governments, intergovernmental organizations, and civil society, as well as the private sector, to prevent atrocity crimes. The Responsibility to Protect has been the subject of considerable debate, particularly regarding the implementation of the principle by various actors in the context of country-specific situations, such as Libya, Syria, Sudan and Kenya, for example. It has also been argued that commensurate with the responsibility to protect, international law should also recognize a right for populations to offer militarily organized resistance to protect themselves against genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes on a massive scale.
http://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/about-responsibility-to-protect.html
RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_to_protect
Responsibility to protect
http://www.globalr2p.org/about_r2p
About R2P
http://www.globalr2p.org/media/files/r2p-backgrounder.pdf
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2013/07/24/what-is-the-responsibility-to-protect/
WHAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT
http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/responsibility-to-protect-a-short-history/
Research Interests: Responsibility to Protect and The principle of the Responsibility to Protect
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have been actively engaged with the United Nations (UN) since its inception in 1945. They work with the United Nations Secretariat, programmes, funds and agencies in various ways, including in consultation with Member States. NGOs contribute to a number of activities including information dissemination, awareness raising, development education, policy advocacy, joint operational projects, participation in intergovernmental processes and in the contribution of services and technical expertise.
Presentasi ini merupakan materi dari perkuliahan umum mengenai peran PBB dan UNODC di dunia dan Indonesia.
Presentasi dibawakan oleh Bapak Paku Utama, Konsultan UNODC di Auditorium Budi Luhur
A short group assignment with Angela Bellington (Zambia) and Gibran Malik (Indonesia).
The presentation was on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). R2P is a concept that places the protection of citizens at the centre of its focus. A framework of action in response to mass atrocity crimes such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing.
Abstract:
The Responsibility to Protect (R2P or RtoP) is a global political commitment which was endorsed by all member states of the United Nations at the 2005 World Summit to prevent genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity The principle of the Responsibility to Protect is based upon the underlying premise that sovereignty entails a responsibility to protect all populations from mass atrocity crimes and human rights violations. The principle is based on a respect for the norms and principles of international law, especially the underlying principles of law relating to sovereignty, peace and security, human rights, and armed conflict. The Responsibility to Protect provides a framework for employing measures that already exist (i.e., mediation, early warning mechanisms, economic sanctions, and chapter VII powers) to prevent atrocity crimes and to protect civilians from their occurrence. The authority to employ the use of force under the framework of the Responsibility to Protect rests solely with United Nations Security Council and is considered a measure of last resort. The United Nations Secretary-General has published annual reports on the Responsibility to Protect since 2009 that expand on the measures available to governments, intergovernmental organizations, and civil society, as well as the private sector, to prevent atrocity crimes. The Responsibility to Protect has been the subject of considerable debate, particularly regarding the implementation of the principle by various actors in the context of country-specific situations, such as Libya, Syria, Sudan and Kenya, for example. It has also been argued that commensurate with the responsibility to protect, international law should also recognize a right for populations to offer militarily organized resistance to protect themselves against genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes on a massive scale.
http://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/about-responsibility-to-protect.html
RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_to_protect
Responsibility to protect
http://www.globalr2p.org/about_r2p
About R2P
http://www.globalr2p.org/media/files/r2p-backgrounder.pdf
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2013/07/24/what-is-the-responsibility-to-protect/
WHAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT
http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/responsibility-to-protect-a-short-history/
Research Interests: Responsibility to Protect and The principle of the Responsibility to Protect
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have been actively engaged with the United Nations (UN) since its inception in 1945. They work with the United Nations Secretariat, programmes, funds and agencies in various ways, including in consultation with Member States. NGOs contribute to a number of activities including information dissemination, awareness raising, development education, policy advocacy, joint operational projects, participation in intergovernmental processes and in the contribution of services and technical expertise.
Presentasi ini merupakan materi dari perkuliahan umum mengenai peran PBB dan UNODC di dunia dan Indonesia.
Presentasi dibawakan oleh Bapak Paku Utama, Konsultan UNODC di Auditorium Budi Luhur
A short group assignment with Angela Bellington (Zambia) and Gibran Malik (Indonesia).
The presentation was on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). R2P is a concept that places the protection of citizens at the centre of its focus. A framework of action in response to mass atrocity crimes such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing.
THE CREATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONSpaperpublications3
Abstract: The study looked at the creation of International Governmental Institutions (IGIs) with emphasis on the international cooperation; the development of IGIs, the development of the position of the international public official, how International Public Officials differ from National Public Officials, and how they conduct international public administration. This study concluded with giving the reader the importance of International Public Administration.
Many countries are writing new constitutions. This provides an important opportunity to
enshrine the basic human rights of all citizens. Despite the rhetoric on the indivisibility of
human rights, while most constitutions recognise civil and political rights as fundamental,
they place economic and social rights under ‘directive principles’ of state policy, making
them less ‘justiciable’. However, some countries have constitutions that guarantee specific
socio-economic rights, and the challenge is to make sure that citizens are able to exercise
these constitutional rights.
THE CREATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONSpaperpublications3
Abstract: The study looked at the creation of International Governmental Institutions (IGIs) with emphasis on the international cooperation; the development of IGIs, the development of the position of the international public official, how International Public Officials differ from National Public Officials, and how they conduct international public administration. This study concluded with giving the reader the importance of International Public Administration.
Many countries are writing new constitutions. This provides an important opportunity to
enshrine the basic human rights of all citizens. Despite the rhetoric on the indivisibility of
human rights, while most constitutions recognise civil and political rights as fundamental,
they place economic and social rights under ‘directive principles’ of state policy, making
them less ‘justiciable’. However, some countries have constitutions that guarantee specific
socio-economic rights, and the challenge is to make sure that citizens are able to exercise
these constitutional rights.
HWPL Newsletter 2016 March : Inside 3.14 Prolclamation Ceremony of the Declar...HWPL
- The 3rd HWPL International Law Peace Committee Meeting
- HWPL International Law Peace Committee Speaks on the Declaration of Peace and Cessation of War
- Proclamation Ceremony of the Declaration of Peace and Cessation of War
- Declaration of Peace and Cessation of War
- Press Conference
- The inauguration of the HWPL Peace Advocacy Committee
- Photo Gallery
Non-governmental, non-profit, public or voluntary organizations may formally contribute to the work of the United Nations after being granted consultative status with the Economic and Social Council under Article 71 of the Charter of the United Nations and on Economic and Social Council Resolution 1996/31
In 1997 a wide-ranging reform programme was initiated to make the United Nations a more effective institution in terms of facing the challenges of the twenty-first century. This reform programme stressed the need to strengthen the inter-linkages between peace and security: poverty reduction and sustainable human development; and promotion of and respect for human rights. The Secretary-General’s call to articulate a coherent vision and strategy for united approaches towards internationally agreed development goals, including the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) at the national level, resulted in the formation of the United Nations Development Group (UNDG) in 1997.
The CCA (Country Common Assessment) and UNDAF (United Nations Development Assistance Frame-work) framework was adopted as a strategy planning tool for the UN system. Together, these initiatives were designed to enhance United Nations collective analysis and programming in support of national goals and priorities in various development processes. Within the UN agenda of peace, security, human development and human rights, the situation of indigenous peoples requires specific attention. In many parts of the world, indigenous peoples suffer from a history of discrimination, human rights’ violations and exclusion that has left them on the margins of the larger societies in which they exist.
For this reason, they face great difficulties in maintaining and developing their own models of development and well-being and are disproportionately affected by poverty and exclusion. Under the basic principles of universality, equality and non-discrimination, indigenous peoples are entitled to the full range of rights established under international law. However, indigenous peoples have distinct and unique cultures and world views that are part of their collective rights, and their needs, aspirations and development strategies for the future may differ from those of the mainstream population.
Their equal worth and dignity can only be assured through the recognition and protection not only of their individual rights, but also of their collective rights as distinct peoples. It is when these rights are asserted collectively that they can be realized in a meaningful way. Over the past decades, national and international indigenous peoples’ movements have grown stronger and have demanded the international system to develop more appropriate governance and development models and practices that respect the rights of indigenous peoples. Many Governments, the UN system and other development actors have acknowledged and recognized these demands as crucial in the world’s efforts to achieve UN goals.
The KCLMUN Blue Book has been written as an intensive guide for beginners to MUN. Although it provides a good preparation for participating in any university-level MUN conference, it is designed to support the Society's weekly training sessions. Much of the MUN experience can only be understood when experienced at firsthand. Join your KCLMUN and experience it for yourself.
1. Pf tz Wr"r'u l7/
Statement by Expert Member Dr. Wilton Littlechild, LP.C.,
Eleventh Session of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, 7-I8 l[.Iay 2012
Agenda ltem 7: Half-Day Discussion on the World Conference on Indigenous
Peoples
l4May 2012
Tha* you, I4r. President. First, let me thank the Plurinational state of Bolivi4 Mexico
and other states who supported our calls for a World Conference. We welcome the
decision to appoint the co-facilitators and thank the Global Coordinating Committee for
all their preparatory work to date. The World Conference will be a historic opporhrnity to
advance the recognition and respect of the rights of Indigenous Peoples.
As a delegate since the first meetings in Kiruna and Geneva in 1977, we have witnessed
significant progress on the initial inshuctions of our elders. The preparatory discussions
will allow us to take stoch to evaluate and to set out a path fol tle future that considers
thelIN Declaration on the Nghts of Indigenous Peoples as a framework for
Reconciliation.
Mr. President, when we began this journey to seek justice in the intemational arena, it
was due to concems of our elders, leaders and members of our Treaty territories about the
willfirl violation of our Treaties as sacred agteements. Since it was Treaties that brought
us here, they have been the basis of our participation, so we would now propose and
recommend Treaties, Agreements and Constructive Arrangements be a fundamental
forum of the World Conference on lndigenous Peoples. As paffIerships for action they
are a positive way forward. Since the llN De claration on the Rights oJ Indigenous
Peoptes till be a central and primary purpose for realization and purzuit of its obj ectives,
we respecffi.rlly restate our call for consideration of the following actions to move the
process towards a successful World Conference:
1. Recognizing that challenges remain as UN Deputy Secretary-General Asha-Rose
Migiro stated in opening this 116 session, "A great deal remains to be done to see tlre
objectives of the United Nati ons Declaration become a reality." It is likewise for the
goals and obj ectives of the Second Intemational Decade of the World's Indigenous
Feoples. The First Decade theme was'?artnership in Action," the second was "A
Decade for Action and Digrrity." As I stated at the side event on the World Conference
here last Wednesday, we need a continued focus on actions to be highlighted. We
respectfrrlly urge all delegatioas here to support our call for a Third Decade with the
therne, "Action on Self-Determination." We need to take this historically significant
opporhrnity to further the realization of the rights of Indigenous Peoples, in particular,
Treaty rights in a way that includes children, youth, women, elders and people with
disabilities.
2. As the preamble of the IJN De claration states, "Considerlng also that Treaties,
Agteements and other Constructive Agreements and the relationship they represent, ale
the basis for a strengthened partrrership between indigenous peoples and states." We
respectfrrlly reiterate our call for the appointrrent of an Indigenous Co-Chair tojointly
2. preside over the plenary meetings of the World Conference, reflective ofthe Treaty
partnership. Furthermore, based on the good practice and experience at the Inter-
Sessional Working Group on the Draft Declaration that a drafting team be appointed with
rights-holders represented, we recommend that the Inter-Agency Support Group, states
and lndigenous peoples' representatives all be represented at all meetings or roundtables
and that such meetings be also co-chaired by Indigenous Peoples' representatives.
3. We reiterate our call, as the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,
that the firll, direct and effective participation of Indigenous Peoples, at all stages ofthe
World Conference process> including the outcome, is of vital importance to ensure its
success and sustainability. Recall also that the IJN Human Rights Council has requested
the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Offrce of Legal A-ffairs to
pr6pare a detailed document on ways and means of promoting participation at the ItN of
Indigenous Peoples' representatives, as they are not always organized as non-govemmental
organizations but as Indigenous Nations, councils, parliaments and
uaditional and other forms of governments and govemance institutions.
4. As to the discussion on consecutive, informal, interactive roundtable meetings and
since tire three UN Indigenous-specific mechanisms are specifically mentioned in
Resolution 65/198, it wouid be important to incorporate the respective mandated areas as
a programme of work that reflects national, regional and global dimensions and
perspectives in a focused manner. In this regard, the thematic elements of the right to
self-determination could include: (1) Treaties, (2) Education, (3) Health, (4) Culture, (5)
Development, (6) Environmen! (7) Human Rights, (8) Recommendations of Studies and
Reports and (9) to (12) Other matters such as spirituality and dispute resolution
mechanisms. These will all inform us as to eiements of the right to self-determination
and the focus of the implementation of the IIN Declaration as a framework for
Reconciliation.
Mr. Chairperson, we need continued focus on Indigenous peoples' rights at the
international level, in particular, at the lIN. This can be accomplished with the
establishment of a Third Intemational Decade. As self-determination is the foundation of
theIJN Declaralioz and there is a universal call for its implementation, now is the time,
now is the opportunity, for all IIN members states and agencies aad Indigenous Nations
and Peoples and their representatives as an act of Reconcili ati on to restore respectfi.rl
relationships in partnership, action and dignity. It begins with a new Decade ofAction on
implementing our right to self-determination as envisioned by our elders. Thank you.