SlideShare a Scribd company logo
The Case for Interpreting the ~5,000 km2 "Upland Deposits" of the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plane as Chesapeake Bay Crater Ejecta Part II David L. Griscom impact Glass research international San Carlos, Sonora, M éxico Slightly modified and lengthened from talk presented at the: Penrose Conference “Late Eocene Earth,” Monte C ò n e ro, Italy, October 6, 2007
50 km Atlantic Ocean Richmond, VA Washington, DC Chesapeake Bay Gravity map  showing negative gravity anomaly coinciding with the inner basin of the Chesapeake Bay structure.  The position of the outer rim is shown as the dashed curve. (After Koeberl et al., 1996). “ Upland deposits”  of southern Maryland (studied by Schlee (1957)) (Unsorted siliciclastic sands, silts and  striated  gravels) Note that incision of the “upland deposits” is mainly the work of major streams and rivers from the west.  There are virtually no tributaries cut into these uplands.   Both the “upland deposits” and the Bacons Castle fm. appear to armor the underlying clay terraces against pluvial erosion.   Fall Line   Blue Ridge   “ Upland Gravels” of eastern Virginia Bacons Castle fm. 115 km
The Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure   (Cross section from Koeberl et al., 1996 and Poag, 1997) Koeberl et al. and Poag:  The  Lower-Cretaceous  target rocks are poorly-lithified, non-marine, mainly siliciclastic sediments ~500 m thick.  Griscom:   It seems possible that these target rocks included alluvial deposits rich in  Devonian  quartzite gravels – exactly matching the description of the “upland deposits”. 400-360 Ma  (Devonian) :  Quartzite sandstones deposited Time 250 Ma:   Appalachian Mountains folded, uplifting anticlines of Devonian quartzites 140-100 Ma  (Lower Cretaceous) :  Alluvial fans crept seaward from the Appalachians 35.5 Ma: Impact!!! My View:
Projectile Diameter: 6 km Projectile Density: 1500 kg/m 3 Impact Velocity: 30 km/s (Vertical Exaggeration ~330 ) X 33 Hypothetical Coastal Plane Contour  Just Before Impact
The “jetting” stage is well known in cratering physics …but this may represent the first ever appeal to jetting in an attempt to explain an actual geological feature on the face of the Earth. 15-cm Ball of Marine Chalk Found in an Upland Depression (Sliced Cross Section) Note “toasted” exterior and  shattered (brecciated) interior. My Model for the Jetting-Phase: The Ocean –  and the Soft Coastal Deposits  –  Are Chamfered at an Angle of ~0.06 o Present day slope of the base of the “upland deposits” Jetting-Induced Debris Flows
“ Upland Deposits”    R -3 4,300 km 3 (Poag, 1997) It is known from explosion experiments that the thicknesses of ejecta blankets follow the -3 rd  power of the radius R from the crater center.  The normalization factor is determined from the total volume of ejecta, which in turn can be scaled from the known diameter of the crater. About Ten Minutes after Impact 0.06 ° Bacons Castle fm.
H.J. Melosh,  Impact Cratering – A Geologic Process (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989)  J.N. Head, H.J. Melosh, B.A. Ivanov Science   298  (2002) 1752    The fastest interference-zone ejecta can leave with ~0.5 times the speed  v i  of the impacting object! ~2.0 Impactor Diameters Interference-Zone Ejecta But let us drop back to the  first few tenths of a second… ~0.02 v i
But let us drop back to the  first few tenths of a second…  GRANITE Vertical Exaggeration X 50 Distance (km) Chesapeake Bay Crater 10 min “ Effective” Interference Zone ( v     0.02 v i ) Frye (1986) found this granite “dropstone” in a mudstone bed 800 km due west of the crater center. 27-kg granite object found among the “upland gravels” 200 km northwest of the crater center (speaker’s front yard). Lower Limit of Interference Zone USGS
CALVERT  I Crystalline Basement: Granites, Metamorphics Marine Clays Cretaceous Non-Marine  Siliciclastic Sand  and Gravel Clay Confining Units “ Effective” Interference Zone Precipitated Ferric Oxyhydroxides Ground Water with Dissolved Fe ~212 km 3 Vertical Exaggeration X330 I propose that the “upland gravels” are interference-zone ejecta comprising pre-formed alluvial, mostly-quartzite gravels >2 mm that were subject to size sorting by atmospheric drag during ballistic flight. Tysons ~90 km 3  gravel >2 mm Washington Loam = base surge or silt?
CALVERT  I “ The Day After”  About 500,000 Years Later   35.5 Ma Chickahominy Fm. CALVERT  II “ Exmore Breccia” Glass ~35.0 Ma About Two Million Years Later   Present  The two Calverts are diachronous in anyone’s model. In my model Calverts  I  and  II  are diachronous across the time plane of just 2 millon years.   In the canonical model Calvert  II  rests on a formation supposedly ~28 m.y. older!   However, materials deposited  on the crater floor ca. 8 Ma should have been removed  by fluvial erosion during the low stands of the Quaternary.   N.B. The fossils in Calverts I  and  II  are neritic species. Lower Eocene clays ??? ??? ~8 Ma

More Related Content

What's hot

Internal structure of the earth
Internal structure of the earthInternal structure of the earth
Internal structure of the earth
Jahangir Alam
 
Prema
PremaPrema
Seafloor magnetic polarity 2
Seafloor  magnetic polarity 2Seafloor  magnetic polarity 2
Seafloor magnetic polarity 2
Makati Science High School
 
Plate Tectonics Lecture
Plate Tectonics LecturePlate Tectonics Lecture
Plate Tectonics Lecture
Terri Kelsey
 
Sea floor spreading
Sea floor spreadingSea floor spreading
Sea floor spreading
Jenny Dixon
 
Solar system & planets
Solar system & planetsSolar system & planets
Solar system & planets
Sanyam Gandotra
 
Rock types and internal structure of earth
Rock types and internal structure of earthRock types and internal structure of earth
Rock types and internal structure of earth
Prince Vicky
 
The dynamic crust
The dynamic crustThe dynamic crust
The dynamic crust
lorizimmerman
 
Physical Geography Lecture 12 - Plate Tectonics 111616
Physical Geography Lecture 12 - Plate Tectonics 111616Physical Geography Lecture 12 - Plate Tectonics 111616
Physical Geography Lecture 12 - Plate Tectonics 111616
angelaorr
 
Earth And Its Interior
Earth And Its InteriorEarth And Its Interior
Earth And Its Interior
Sanyam Gandotra
 
Introduction to geodynamics
Introduction to geodynamicsIntroduction to geodynamics
Introduction to geodynamics
Prashant Katti
 
Structure Of The Earth
Structure Of The EarthStructure Of The Earth
Structure Of The Earth
amr hassaan
 
Crust core and mantle
Crust core and mantleCrust core and mantle
Crust core and mantle
P.K. Mani
 
Internal structure of earth with repect to seismic waves
Internal structure of earth with repect to seismic wavesInternal structure of earth with repect to seismic waves
Internal structure of earth with repect to seismic waves
Shah Naseer
 
Earth internal structure
Earth internal structureEarth internal structure
2.4 tectonic plate boundaries
2.4 tectonic plate boundaries 2.4 tectonic plate boundaries
2.4 tectonic plate boundaries
mojavehack
 
Plate tectonics quiz-fernando
Plate tectonics quiz-fernandoPlate tectonics quiz-fernando
Plate tectonics quiz-fernando
biologia, geologia , poesía , vida,
 
Plate tectonics
Plate tectonicsPlate tectonics
Plate tectonics
lschmidt1170
 
The Earth’s Structure
The Earth’s StructureThe Earth’s Structure
The Earth’s Structure
Steve Bishop
 
Prentice Hall Earth Science ch09 plate tectonics
Prentice Hall Earth Science ch09 plate tectonicsPrentice Hall Earth Science ch09 plate tectonics
Prentice Hall Earth Science ch09 plate tectonics
Tim Corner
 

What's hot (20)

Internal structure of the earth
Internal structure of the earthInternal structure of the earth
Internal structure of the earth
 
Prema
PremaPrema
Prema
 
Seafloor magnetic polarity 2
Seafloor  magnetic polarity 2Seafloor  magnetic polarity 2
Seafloor magnetic polarity 2
 
Plate Tectonics Lecture
Plate Tectonics LecturePlate Tectonics Lecture
Plate Tectonics Lecture
 
Sea floor spreading
Sea floor spreadingSea floor spreading
Sea floor spreading
 
Solar system & planets
Solar system & planetsSolar system & planets
Solar system & planets
 
Rock types and internal structure of earth
Rock types and internal structure of earthRock types and internal structure of earth
Rock types and internal structure of earth
 
The dynamic crust
The dynamic crustThe dynamic crust
The dynamic crust
 
Physical Geography Lecture 12 - Plate Tectonics 111616
Physical Geography Lecture 12 - Plate Tectonics 111616Physical Geography Lecture 12 - Plate Tectonics 111616
Physical Geography Lecture 12 - Plate Tectonics 111616
 
Earth And Its Interior
Earth And Its InteriorEarth And Its Interior
Earth And Its Interior
 
Introduction to geodynamics
Introduction to geodynamicsIntroduction to geodynamics
Introduction to geodynamics
 
Structure Of The Earth
Structure Of The EarthStructure Of The Earth
Structure Of The Earth
 
Crust core and mantle
Crust core and mantleCrust core and mantle
Crust core and mantle
 
Internal structure of earth with repect to seismic waves
Internal structure of earth with repect to seismic wavesInternal structure of earth with repect to seismic waves
Internal structure of earth with repect to seismic waves
 
Earth internal structure
Earth internal structureEarth internal structure
Earth internal structure
 
2.4 tectonic plate boundaries
2.4 tectonic plate boundaries 2.4 tectonic plate boundaries
2.4 tectonic plate boundaries
 
Plate tectonics quiz-fernando
Plate tectonics quiz-fernandoPlate tectonics quiz-fernando
Plate tectonics quiz-fernando
 
Plate tectonics
Plate tectonicsPlate tectonics
Plate tectonics
 
The Earth’s Structure
The Earth’s StructureThe Earth’s Structure
The Earth’s Structure
 
Prentice Hall Earth Science ch09 plate tectonics
Prentice Hall Earth Science ch09 plate tectonicsPrentice Hall Earth Science ch09 plate tectonics
Prentice Hall Earth Science ch09 plate tectonics
 

Similar to Part2GriscomPenroseConferenceLecture

Fountains of the deep
Fountains of the deepFountains of the deep
Fountains of the deep
EL GRAN ROMPECABEZAS
 
Part1GriscomPenroseConferenceLecture
Part1GriscomPenroseConferenceLecturePart1GriscomPenroseConferenceLecture
Part1GriscomPenroseConferenceLecture
dlgriscom
 
CB-Impactite Talk_LPL revised
CB-Impactite Talk_LPL revisedCB-Impactite Talk_LPL revised
CB-Impactite Talk_LPL revised
David L. Griscom
 
Mike_Stoever_Text
Mike_Stoever_TextMike_Stoever_Text
Mike_Stoever_Text
Michael J. (Mike) Stoever
 
Hawaii -Kilauea - Eruptions - Seismic Activity - The Earth's Core
Hawaii  -Kilauea - Eruptions - Seismic Activity - The Earth's CoreHawaii  -Kilauea - Eruptions - Seismic Activity - The Earth's Core
Hawaii -Kilauea - Eruptions - Seismic Activity - The Earth's Core
Clifton M. Hasegawa & Associates, LLC
 
Oceanic trenches
Oceanic trenchesOceanic trenches
Oceanic trenches
Prashant Katti
 
Webquest answers
Webquest answersWebquest answers
Webquest answers
caraleestarling
 
LPSC Venus Poster Final3-shrunk
LPSC Venus Poster Final3-shrunkLPSC Venus Poster Final3-shrunk
LPSC Venus Poster Final3-shrunk
Nicholas Kelly
 
Aaa earthquake engineering2
Aaa earthquake engineering2Aaa earthquake engineering2
Aaa earthquake engineering2
Edz Gapuz
 
lecture1-seismology.ppt
lecture1-seismology.pptlecture1-seismology.ppt
lecture1-seismology.ppt
ajibar
 
Subduction Zones and their Associated Features
Subduction Zones and their Associated FeaturesSubduction Zones and their Associated Features
Subduction Zones and their Associated Features
Ruhr Universität Bochum
 
Ch8_EQ_students
Ch8_EQ_studentsCh8_EQ_students
Ch8_EQ_students
cresnick
 
Were Most of Earth's Fossil-Bering Sedimentary Rock Layers Deposited by Noah'...
Were Most of Earth's Fossil-Bering Sedimentary Rock Layers Deposited by Noah'...Were Most of Earth's Fossil-Bering Sedimentary Rock Layers Deposited by Noah'...
Were Most of Earth's Fossil-Bering Sedimentary Rock Layers Deposited by Noah'...
Tim Helble
 
Plate Tectonics
Plate TectonicsPlate Tectonics
Plate Tectonics
Rob Micallef
 
Lithosphere
LithosphereLithosphere
Lithosphere
angelabentley
 
PLATE-TECTONICS.pptx
PLATE-TECTONICS.pptxPLATE-TECTONICS.pptx
PLATE-TECTONICS.pptx
airisaguinaldorabaca
 
Earth Structure
Earth StructureEarth Structure
Earth Structure
Trisha Lane Atienza
 
Plate Tectonics, Earthquake & Volcano
Plate Tectonics, Earthquake & VolcanoPlate Tectonics, Earthquake & Volcano
Plate Tectonics, Earthquake & Volcano
Malia Damit
 
Grade 10_science1stquartermodule1.pptx
Grade 10_science1stquartermodule1.pptxGrade 10_science1stquartermodule1.pptx
Grade 10_science1stquartermodule1.pptx
ErlenaMirador1
 
The Boltysh crater fill sediments – a 500,000 year record of the lower Danian
The Boltysh crater fill sediments – a 500,000 year record of the lower DanianThe Boltysh crater fill sediments – a 500,000 year record of the lower Danian
The Boltysh crater fill sediments – a 500,000 year record of the lower Danian
Iain Gilmour
 

Similar to Part2GriscomPenroseConferenceLecture (20)

Fountains of the deep
Fountains of the deepFountains of the deep
Fountains of the deep
 
Part1GriscomPenroseConferenceLecture
Part1GriscomPenroseConferenceLecturePart1GriscomPenroseConferenceLecture
Part1GriscomPenroseConferenceLecture
 
CB-Impactite Talk_LPL revised
CB-Impactite Talk_LPL revisedCB-Impactite Talk_LPL revised
CB-Impactite Talk_LPL revised
 
Mike_Stoever_Text
Mike_Stoever_TextMike_Stoever_Text
Mike_Stoever_Text
 
Hawaii -Kilauea - Eruptions - Seismic Activity - The Earth's Core
Hawaii  -Kilauea - Eruptions - Seismic Activity - The Earth's CoreHawaii  -Kilauea - Eruptions - Seismic Activity - The Earth's Core
Hawaii -Kilauea - Eruptions - Seismic Activity - The Earth's Core
 
Oceanic trenches
Oceanic trenchesOceanic trenches
Oceanic trenches
 
Webquest answers
Webquest answersWebquest answers
Webquest answers
 
LPSC Venus Poster Final3-shrunk
LPSC Venus Poster Final3-shrunkLPSC Venus Poster Final3-shrunk
LPSC Venus Poster Final3-shrunk
 
Aaa earthquake engineering2
Aaa earthquake engineering2Aaa earthquake engineering2
Aaa earthquake engineering2
 
lecture1-seismology.ppt
lecture1-seismology.pptlecture1-seismology.ppt
lecture1-seismology.ppt
 
Subduction Zones and their Associated Features
Subduction Zones and their Associated FeaturesSubduction Zones and their Associated Features
Subduction Zones and their Associated Features
 
Ch8_EQ_students
Ch8_EQ_studentsCh8_EQ_students
Ch8_EQ_students
 
Were Most of Earth's Fossil-Bering Sedimentary Rock Layers Deposited by Noah'...
Were Most of Earth's Fossil-Bering Sedimentary Rock Layers Deposited by Noah'...Were Most of Earth's Fossil-Bering Sedimentary Rock Layers Deposited by Noah'...
Were Most of Earth's Fossil-Bering Sedimentary Rock Layers Deposited by Noah'...
 
Plate Tectonics
Plate TectonicsPlate Tectonics
Plate Tectonics
 
Lithosphere
LithosphereLithosphere
Lithosphere
 
PLATE-TECTONICS.pptx
PLATE-TECTONICS.pptxPLATE-TECTONICS.pptx
PLATE-TECTONICS.pptx
 
Earth Structure
Earth StructureEarth Structure
Earth Structure
 
Plate Tectonics, Earthquake & Volcano
Plate Tectonics, Earthquake & VolcanoPlate Tectonics, Earthquake & Volcano
Plate Tectonics, Earthquake & Volcano
 
Grade 10_science1stquartermodule1.pptx
Grade 10_science1stquartermodule1.pptxGrade 10_science1stquartermodule1.pptx
Grade 10_science1stquartermodule1.pptx
 
The Boltysh crater fill sediments – a 500,000 year record of the lower Danian
The Boltysh crater fill sediments – a 500,000 year record of the lower DanianThe Boltysh crater fill sediments – a 500,000 year record of the lower Danian
The Boltysh crater fill sediments – a 500,000 year record of the lower Danian
 

Part2GriscomPenroseConferenceLecture

  • 1. The Case for Interpreting the ~5,000 km2 "Upland Deposits" of the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plane as Chesapeake Bay Crater Ejecta Part II David L. Griscom impact Glass research international San Carlos, Sonora, M éxico Slightly modified and lengthened from talk presented at the: Penrose Conference “Late Eocene Earth,” Monte C ò n e ro, Italy, October 6, 2007
  • 2. 50 km Atlantic Ocean Richmond, VA Washington, DC Chesapeake Bay Gravity map showing negative gravity anomaly coinciding with the inner basin of the Chesapeake Bay structure. The position of the outer rim is shown as the dashed curve. (After Koeberl et al., 1996). “ Upland deposits” of southern Maryland (studied by Schlee (1957)) (Unsorted siliciclastic sands, silts and striated gravels) Note that incision of the “upland deposits” is mainly the work of major streams and rivers from the west. There are virtually no tributaries cut into these uplands. Both the “upland deposits” and the Bacons Castle fm. appear to armor the underlying clay terraces against pluvial erosion. Fall Line Blue Ridge “ Upland Gravels” of eastern Virginia Bacons Castle fm. 115 km
  • 3. The Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure (Cross section from Koeberl et al., 1996 and Poag, 1997) Koeberl et al. and Poag: The Lower-Cretaceous target rocks are poorly-lithified, non-marine, mainly siliciclastic sediments ~500 m thick. Griscom: It seems possible that these target rocks included alluvial deposits rich in Devonian quartzite gravels – exactly matching the description of the “upland deposits”. 400-360 Ma (Devonian) : Quartzite sandstones deposited Time 250 Ma: Appalachian Mountains folded, uplifting anticlines of Devonian quartzites 140-100 Ma (Lower Cretaceous) : Alluvial fans crept seaward from the Appalachians 35.5 Ma: Impact!!! My View:
  • 4. Projectile Diameter: 6 km Projectile Density: 1500 kg/m 3 Impact Velocity: 30 km/s (Vertical Exaggeration ~330 ) X 33 Hypothetical Coastal Plane Contour Just Before Impact
  • 5. The “jetting” stage is well known in cratering physics …but this may represent the first ever appeal to jetting in an attempt to explain an actual geological feature on the face of the Earth. 15-cm Ball of Marine Chalk Found in an Upland Depression (Sliced Cross Section) Note “toasted” exterior and shattered (brecciated) interior. My Model for the Jetting-Phase: The Ocean – and the Soft Coastal Deposits – Are Chamfered at an Angle of ~0.06 o Present day slope of the base of the “upland deposits” Jetting-Induced Debris Flows
  • 6. “ Upland Deposits”  R -3 4,300 km 3 (Poag, 1997) It is known from explosion experiments that the thicknesses of ejecta blankets follow the -3 rd power of the radius R from the crater center. The normalization factor is determined from the total volume of ejecta, which in turn can be scaled from the known diameter of the crater. About Ten Minutes after Impact 0.06 ° Bacons Castle fm.
  • 7. H.J. Melosh, Impact Cratering – A Geologic Process (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989)  J.N. Head, H.J. Melosh, B.A. Ivanov Science 298 (2002) 1752  The fastest interference-zone ejecta can leave with ~0.5 times the speed v i of the impacting object! ~2.0 Impactor Diameters Interference-Zone Ejecta But let us drop back to the first few tenths of a second… ~0.02 v i
  • 8. But let us drop back to the first few tenths of a second…  GRANITE Vertical Exaggeration X 50 Distance (km) Chesapeake Bay Crater 10 min “ Effective” Interference Zone ( v  0.02 v i ) Frye (1986) found this granite “dropstone” in a mudstone bed 800 km due west of the crater center. 27-kg granite object found among the “upland gravels” 200 km northwest of the crater center (speaker’s front yard). Lower Limit of Interference Zone USGS
  • 9. CALVERT I Crystalline Basement: Granites, Metamorphics Marine Clays Cretaceous Non-Marine Siliciclastic Sand and Gravel Clay Confining Units “ Effective” Interference Zone Precipitated Ferric Oxyhydroxides Ground Water with Dissolved Fe ~212 km 3 Vertical Exaggeration X330 I propose that the “upland gravels” are interference-zone ejecta comprising pre-formed alluvial, mostly-quartzite gravels >2 mm that were subject to size sorting by atmospheric drag during ballistic flight. Tysons ~90 km 3 gravel >2 mm Washington Loam = base surge or silt?
  • 10. CALVERT I “ The Day After” About 500,000 Years Later 35.5 Ma Chickahominy Fm. CALVERT II “ Exmore Breccia” Glass ~35.0 Ma About Two Million Years Later Present The two Calverts are diachronous in anyone’s model. In my model Calverts I and II are diachronous across the time plane of just 2 millon years. In the canonical model Calvert II rests on a formation supposedly ~28 m.y. older! However, materials deposited on the crater floor ca. 8 Ma should have been removed by fluvial erosion during the low stands of the Quaternary. N.B. The fossils in Calverts I and II are neritic species. Lower Eocene clays ??? ??? ~8 Ma