2. 1. Explain the complete organization of the content in the document.
I chose group B. As for them, the animated cartoon company was scheduled.
They try to undertake work related to the animated cartoon. They have aimed spread the
animated cartoon at the people.
They try to sell it making the character goods. They try to tell the world animation in
Japan.
2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document clearly represent the
idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments.
It was very comprehensible. I felt zeal from these sentences. Because they think about
the future of Japan.
3. What details are included in the document?
As for these sentences, the view of which role who allotment and the company etc. are
written.
4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it?
It was very comprehensible.
3. 5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good?
I thought these sentences to be a very legible because it was concisely brought together.
The word was comprehensible.
6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected?
It was not found to me.
7. What specific suggestions for improving the document can you make?
I think that these sentences should increase the quantity more. The persuasive powers of
sentences will increase if it does so.
8. Identify three basic differences between how your group authored the document and
how this group authored it?
First, The forms of the first sentences are different.
Second, The lengths of sentences are different.
Third, The target is different.
