The document discusses the need for digital learning for all students to prepare them for the 21st century. It argues that the world has become flat, digital, and constantly changing, requiring new skills. It proposes providing every student with a device and open digital materials to achieve digital learning for all. The implementation would occur over three phases: decision making, planning, and execution. The goal is to change systems, culture and leadership to support digital learning and close equity gaps.
5. “Work will be dominated by fast-
moving, geographically diverse, free-
agent teams of workers connected via
socially mediating technologies.”
Fred Stutzman, Carnegie Mellon
“The replacement of memorization by
analysis will be the biggest boon to
society since the coming of mass
literacy.”
Paul Jones, UNC- Chapel Hill
“There is no doubt that brains are being
rewired.”
Danah Boyd, Microsoft Research
6. Instruction Will/Should Change…
• Less paper, more pixels.
• Less single source,
more crowd source.
• Less routine,
more personalization.
7. Instruction Will/Should Change…
• Less compliance,
more engagement.
• Less consuming,
more producing.
• Less about how much,
more about how well.
This is the defining challenge of our times in public school.
The only solution then is to wait – wait until that day when we can afford to buy every student the same device.Is it really more equitable to say that no one has access to technology until everyone can have the same thing?It’s not about the device, its about what we do with it.The only solution then is to wait – wait until that day when we can afford to buy every student the same device.Is it really more equitable to say that no one has access to technology until everyone can have the same thing?It’s not about the device, its about what we do with it.The only solution then is to wait – wait until that day when we can afford to buy every student the same device.Is it really more equitable to say that no one has access to technology until everyone can have the same thing?It’s not about the device, its about what we do with it.The only solution then is to wait – wait until that day when we can afford to buy every student the same device.Is it really more equitable to say that no one has access to technology until everyone can have the same thing?It’s not about the device, its about what we do with it.
How does denying children access to technology in the name of equity serve their needs?Without access they will never have the opportunity to develop the skills that their more appropriately resourced peers have at home every day.