This document discusses informatics tools that can support patient-provider communication. Digital technology has changed how patients and providers communicate, with examples being patient portals, personal health records, and online patient communities. Practical considerations for these tools include health literacy, privacy, access, and adapting clinical culture. Studies found patients having access to their medical records improved communication with providers and engagement in their own care.
The Physician Task Force's How-to Guide will help both clinicians and C-suite executives identify which mobile tools are needed and worth investing in.
KareXpert is aiming to bring a radical transformation in Indian
healthcare industry, by offering a public cloud platform which is patient centric and promises to redefine the patient care by promoting patient continuity. KareXpert Services are driven by the rising social expectation among the general population for a healthcare sector that is people-centric, affordable and efficient.
Patient Engagement in Healthcare Improves Health and Reduces CostsM2SYS Technology
It’s been said that patient engagement develops naturally when there is a regular, focused communication between patient and provider and it leads to behaviors that meet or more closely approach treatment guidelines. It is also believed that patients engaged in their own care make fewer demands on the health care system and more importantly, they experience improved health. Patients who are educated about both their condition and their care are also patients who are most likely to get and stay healthy. In fact, many believe that empowering patients to actively process information, decide how that information fits into their lives, and act on those decisions is a key driver to improving care and reducing costs.
Research shows that informed and engaged patients take a more active role in their own care and furthermore, health care organizations are slowly discovering how patient engagement contributes to their financial and quality objectives. Patient engagement essentially revolves around the theory that if patients understand their condition, know the symptoms to watch for, know why they’re taking medication for example and how to implement the necessary lifestyle changes, the chances of them getting and staying healthy are significantly improved and when you proactively engage patients in their care, the quality of that care improves.
Listen in to our latest podcast with Brad Tritle, Director of Business Development for Vitaphone Health Solutions, chair of the HIMSS Social Media Task Force and contributing editor of the HIMSS book Engage! Transforming Healthcare through Digital Patient Engagement as we discuss the current state of patient engagement in healthcare, how it is defined, whether it really does have a significant impact on improving health and reducing the cost of care, what engagement initiatives are providers using and what the future of patient engagement may look like.
The Physician Task Force's How-to Guide will help both clinicians and C-suite executives identify which mobile tools are needed and worth investing in.
KareXpert is aiming to bring a radical transformation in Indian
healthcare industry, by offering a public cloud platform which is patient centric and promises to redefine the patient care by promoting patient continuity. KareXpert Services are driven by the rising social expectation among the general population for a healthcare sector that is people-centric, affordable and efficient.
Patient Engagement in Healthcare Improves Health and Reduces CostsM2SYS Technology
It’s been said that patient engagement develops naturally when there is a regular, focused communication between patient and provider and it leads to behaviors that meet or more closely approach treatment guidelines. It is also believed that patients engaged in their own care make fewer demands on the health care system and more importantly, they experience improved health. Patients who are educated about both their condition and their care are also patients who are most likely to get and stay healthy. In fact, many believe that empowering patients to actively process information, decide how that information fits into their lives, and act on those decisions is a key driver to improving care and reducing costs.
Research shows that informed and engaged patients take a more active role in their own care and furthermore, health care organizations are slowly discovering how patient engagement contributes to their financial and quality objectives. Patient engagement essentially revolves around the theory that if patients understand their condition, know the symptoms to watch for, know why they’re taking medication for example and how to implement the necessary lifestyle changes, the chances of them getting and staying healthy are significantly improved and when you proactively engage patients in their care, the quality of that care improves.
Listen in to our latest podcast with Brad Tritle, Director of Business Development for Vitaphone Health Solutions, chair of the HIMSS Social Media Task Force and contributing editor of the HIMSS book Engage! Transforming Healthcare through Digital Patient Engagement as we discuss the current state of patient engagement in healthcare, how it is defined, whether it really does have a significant impact on improving health and reducing the cost of care, what engagement initiatives are providers using and what the future of patient engagement may look like.
How to Reduce Readmissions by Changing Patient EducationChuck Jones
The challenge is no longer finding the perfect medication but rather convincing the patient to take their medication as prescribed. It's no longer providing discharge instructions but educating the patient so they understand the need to follow through on behavior change to avoid repeating habits that brought them to the hospital in the first place.
Maxime Lê is a graduate of health sciences from the University of Ottawa that has worn many hats for many roles. Chief among them is being a patient advisor for The Ottawa Hospital. Having frequently been a patient and having a passion for health and healthcare, he decided to get involved at The Ottawa Hospital to help improve care, research and advocate for patients. Maxime, while sharing his hands-on experience and insights, answered the questions that healthcare providers, researchers, or prospective patient advisors may have, such as: ''What does it mean to be a patient advisor?'', ''Why is it important?'', and ''What impact does it have?''.
The webinar was followed by an interactive question and answer session.
The Empowered Patient of the 21st Century – How Technology Enables Good Medic...Wellbe
This presentation will present a profile of empowered, e-patients, their expectations and challenges when confronted with medical issues and have to deal with the medical establishment, and the tools that they use to communicate and collaborate with their health care providers. Patients are looking for compassionate, caring providers who are comfortable engaging with them in open two-way communication. They expect full information at the point of care so that in partnership with their providers they can make appropriate choices and good decisions
Today’s e-patient is used to constant communication delivered in sound bites from a variety of media. They use email to communicate with their colleagues and business associates, access various online networks and databases in order to connect with others, use a variety of health apps on their smartphones, and find needed information on the web. They are concerned with their health, but are typically confused and overwhelmed with the complexity of health care. The presentation will review the tools that e-patients and savvy providers use to provide the patient-centered care that we are all trying to achieve including: digital health records, email, patient portals, health information exchange, smartphones, online resources and telemedicine technology.
About the Speaker:
Nancy B. Finn is a health care journalist, thought leader and patient advocate focusing on patient empowerment and engagement with the deployment of digital communication technology. She is the author of “e-Patients Live Longer, the Complete Guide to Managing Health Care Using Technology”, published by iUniverse. She is one of the blog authors of e-patients.net published by the Society for Participatory Medicine, writes the health care blog www.healthcarebasicsinfo.com, and is the editor of Health Care Basics, a monthly e-newsletter. She is a contributing columnist and a reviewer for the Journal of Participatory Medicine and is sought after to write articles for health-related publications.
Optimizing your EHR Value through Patient EngagementBrian Ahier
Focusing on the transformed healthcare system enabled by ARRA, hear ideas on how patients can help realize the value of your EHR and help you achieve meaningful use.
Judy Murphy, RN, FACMI, FHIMSS, FAAN
Deputy National Coordinator for Programs and Policy, Office of the National Coordinator for HIT
Improving the Patient Experience with HIT WebcastIatric Systems
Learn how to improve patient experience, weave patient-facing HIT and engagement protocols into your plans, and create a roadmap to improve patient care.
Michigan Hospital Association Governance meetingMary Beth Bolton
Patient centered medical home activities in MI and Nationally and the opportunity to improve quality outcomes by increased access to primary care doctors who outreach members who are missing preventive and chronic care services.
Karen Day, University of Auckland
Koray Atalag, University of Auckland
Denise Irvine, e3health
Bryan Houliston, Auckland University of Technology
(4/11/10, Illott, 1.45)
Rethinking Value Based Healthcare
Around the world healthcare providers are busy exploring how value-based healthcare can both improve the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare delivery and seed new opportunities for innovation. Continuing our collaboration with Denmark, we are very pleased to release a new perspective on how VBHC can have greater impact in practice. Based on insights from a recent event hosted by DTU Executive Business Education and undertaken in partnership with Rethink Value, this point of view looks at the key issues for patients, physicals, providers and payers.
It explores some of the associated implications for healthcare systems worldwide, highlights several leading early examples of VBHC in practice and looks at how it can have impact at scale. Recommendations focus on the structure of care, key metrics, moving beyond pilots, changes in reimbursement models and the need for greater insight sharing and deeper collaboration.
For related Future Agenda research see www.futureofpatientdata.org
How to Reduce Readmissions by Changing Patient EducationChuck Jones
The challenge is no longer finding the perfect medication but rather convincing the patient to take their medication as prescribed. It's no longer providing discharge instructions but educating the patient so they understand the need to follow through on behavior change to avoid repeating habits that brought them to the hospital in the first place.
Maxime Lê is a graduate of health sciences from the University of Ottawa that has worn many hats for many roles. Chief among them is being a patient advisor for The Ottawa Hospital. Having frequently been a patient and having a passion for health and healthcare, he decided to get involved at The Ottawa Hospital to help improve care, research and advocate for patients. Maxime, while sharing his hands-on experience and insights, answered the questions that healthcare providers, researchers, or prospective patient advisors may have, such as: ''What does it mean to be a patient advisor?'', ''Why is it important?'', and ''What impact does it have?''.
The webinar was followed by an interactive question and answer session.
The Empowered Patient of the 21st Century – How Technology Enables Good Medic...Wellbe
This presentation will present a profile of empowered, e-patients, their expectations and challenges when confronted with medical issues and have to deal with the medical establishment, and the tools that they use to communicate and collaborate with their health care providers. Patients are looking for compassionate, caring providers who are comfortable engaging with them in open two-way communication. They expect full information at the point of care so that in partnership with their providers they can make appropriate choices and good decisions
Today’s e-patient is used to constant communication delivered in sound bites from a variety of media. They use email to communicate with their colleagues and business associates, access various online networks and databases in order to connect with others, use a variety of health apps on their smartphones, and find needed information on the web. They are concerned with their health, but are typically confused and overwhelmed with the complexity of health care. The presentation will review the tools that e-patients and savvy providers use to provide the patient-centered care that we are all trying to achieve including: digital health records, email, patient portals, health information exchange, smartphones, online resources and telemedicine technology.
About the Speaker:
Nancy B. Finn is a health care journalist, thought leader and patient advocate focusing on patient empowerment and engagement with the deployment of digital communication technology. She is the author of “e-Patients Live Longer, the Complete Guide to Managing Health Care Using Technology”, published by iUniverse. She is one of the blog authors of e-patients.net published by the Society for Participatory Medicine, writes the health care blog www.healthcarebasicsinfo.com, and is the editor of Health Care Basics, a monthly e-newsletter. She is a contributing columnist and a reviewer for the Journal of Participatory Medicine and is sought after to write articles for health-related publications.
Optimizing your EHR Value through Patient EngagementBrian Ahier
Focusing on the transformed healthcare system enabled by ARRA, hear ideas on how patients can help realize the value of your EHR and help you achieve meaningful use.
Judy Murphy, RN, FACMI, FHIMSS, FAAN
Deputy National Coordinator for Programs and Policy, Office of the National Coordinator for HIT
Improving the Patient Experience with HIT WebcastIatric Systems
Learn how to improve patient experience, weave patient-facing HIT and engagement protocols into your plans, and create a roadmap to improve patient care.
Michigan Hospital Association Governance meetingMary Beth Bolton
Patient centered medical home activities in MI and Nationally and the opportunity to improve quality outcomes by increased access to primary care doctors who outreach members who are missing preventive and chronic care services.
Karen Day, University of Auckland
Koray Atalag, University of Auckland
Denise Irvine, e3health
Bryan Houliston, Auckland University of Technology
(4/11/10, Illott, 1.45)
Rethinking Value Based Healthcare
Around the world healthcare providers are busy exploring how value-based healthcare can both improve the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare delivery and seed new opportunities for innovation. Continuing our collaboration with Denmark, we are very pleased to release a new perspective on how VBHC can have greater impact in practice. Based on insights from a recent event hosted by DTU Executive Business Education and undertaken in partnership with Rethink Value, this point of view looks at the key issues for patients, physicals, providers and payers.
It explores some of the associated implications for healthcare systems worldwide, highlights several leading early examples of VBHC in practice and looks at how it can have impact at scale. Recommendations focus on the structure of care, key metrics, moving beyond pilots, changes in reimbursement models and the need for greater insight sharing and deeper collaboration.
For related Future Agenda research see www.futureofpatientdata.org
In search of a digital health compass: My data, my decision, our powerchronaki
Knowledge is power. Despite extensive investments in digital health technology, navigating the health system online is challenging for most citizens. Also for eHealth, the “Inverse Care Law” proposed by Hart in 1971, seems to apply. Availability of good medical or social care services and tools online, varies inversely with the need of the population. The low adoption of eHealth services, and persistent disparities in health triggers a call for multidisciplinary action.
Barriers and challenges are not to be underestimated. Culture, education, skills, costs, perceptions of power and role, are essential for multidisciplinary action. This comes together in digital health literacy, which ought to become an integral part to navigate any health system. Patients living with an implanted device or coping with persistent, chronic disease such as diabetes, as well as citizens engaged in self-care, caring for an elderly relative, a neighbor, or their child with illness or deteriorating health, need a digital health compass.
The panel will engage the audience to elaborate on a vision for this personal, digital health compass and drive advancement in health informatics and digital health standards. The transformative power of health data fueled by targeted digital health literacy interventions can be leveraged by open, massive, and individualized delivery. This way, digital health literate, confident patients and citizens join health professionals, researchers and policy makers to address age-related health and wellness changes to shape the emerging precision medicine and population health initiatives.
From a panel in the eHealthweek 2016. http://www.ehealthweek.org/ehome/128630/hl7-efmi-sessions/
Information systems for health decision making - a citizen's perspectiveErdem Yazganoglu
We make health decisions everyday. We get our information from the Internet. As a society we are investing large amounts of funding for the health information systems. In this presentation, I tried to look from the perspective of a citizen and tried bringing a different perspective.
Low Functional health literacy is a problem affecting 90 million residents of the United States. Among the 90 million, 36% are adults who have “below basic” health literacy skills. Assessing health literacy is important in improving health behaviors, health outcomes, and perceived communication barriers related to health. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act enacted in 2010 brought about changes that demand a more coordinated approach to manage health care services. This research focused on the efforts being made to promote health literacy at Medicaid health homes such as Greater Buffalo United Accountable Healthcare Network (GBUAHN). This research consisted of observation of Patient Health Navigator interactions with patients in order to identify best practices of health literacy initiatives within GBUAHN. Results suggest best practices include promoting and establishing relationship to effectively enhance patients understanding of all their healthcare needs. This study suggests that GBUAHN should continue making use of recommendations related health literacy promotion while exploring areas of improvement as noted on scorecard. Patient Health Navigators are engaging patient in manner that will establish adherence within patients.
M. Chris Gibbons - Health IT and Healthcare DisparitiesPlain Talk 2015
"Health IT and Healthcare Disparities" was presented at the Center for Health Literacy Conference 2011: Plain Talk in Complex Times by M. Chris Gibbons, MD, MPH, Associate Director, Johns Hopkins Urban Health Institute.
Description: This presenter will discuss the use of technology and consumer health information to improve healthcare disparities.
Consumer Health Information & Telehealth andreakyer
Week 7 presentation on Consumer Healthcare Informatics and Telehealth for INFO648 - Biomedical Informatics, iSchool Drexel University, Professor Michelle Rogers, PhD, Fall 2009
Telehealth Psychology Building Trust with Clients.pptxThe Harvest Clinic
Telehealth psychology is a digital approach that offers psychological services and mental health care to clients remotely, using technologies like video conferencing, phone calls, text messaging, and mobile apps for communication.
Global launch of the Healthy Ageing and Prevention Index 2nd wave – alongside...ILC- UK
The Healthy Ageing and Prevention Index is an online tool created by ILC that ranks countries on six metrics including, life span, health span, work span, income, environmental performance, and happiness. The Index helps us understand how well countries have adapted to longevity and inform decision makers on what must be done to maximise the economic benefits that comes with living well for longer.
Alongside the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva on 28 May 2024, we launched the second version of our Index, allowing us to track progress and give new insights into what needs to be done to keep populations healthier for longer.
The speakers included:
Professor Orazio Schillaci, Minister of Health, Italy
Dr Hans Groth, Chairman of the Board, World Demographic & Ageing Forum
Professor Ilona Kickbusch, Founder and Chair, Global Health Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute and co-chair, World Health Summit Council
Dr Natasha Azzopardi Muscat, Director, Country Health Policies and Systems Division, World Health Organisation EURO
Dr Marta Lomazzi, Executive Manager, World Federation of Public Health Associations
Dr Shyam Bishen, Head, Centre for Health and Healthcare and Member of the Executive Committee, World Economic Forum
Dr Karin Tegmark Wisell, Director General, Public Health Agency of Sweden
CRISPR-Cas9, a revolutionary gene-editing tool, holds immense potential to reshape medicine, agriculture, and our understanding of life. But like any powerful tool, it comes with ethical considerations.
Unveiling CRISPR: This naturally occurring bacterial defense system (crRNA & Cas9 protein) fights viruses. Scientists repurposed it for precise gene editing (correction, deletion, insertion) by targeting specific DNA sequences.
The Promise: CRISPR offers exciting possibilities:
Gene Therapy: Correcting genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis.
Agriculture: Engineering crops resistant to pests and harsh environments.
Research: Studying gene function to unlock new knowledge.
The Peril: Ethical concerns demand attention:
Off-target Effects: Unintended DNA edits can have unforeseen consequences.
Eugenics: Misusing CRISPR for designer babies raises social and ethical questions.
Equity: High costs could limit access to this potentially life-saving technology.
The Path Forward: Responsible development is crucial:
International Collaboration: Clear guidelines are needed for research and human trials.
Public Education: Open discussions ensure informed decisions about CRISPR.
Prioritize Safety and Ethics: Safety and ethical principles must be paramount.
CRISPR offers a powerful tool for a better future, but responsible development and addressing ethical concerns are essential. By prioritizing safety, fostering open dialogue, and ensuring equitable access, we can harness CRISPR's power for the benefit of all. (2998 characters)
One of the most developed cities of India, the city of Chennai is the capital of Tamilnadu and many people from different parts of India come here to earn their bread and butter. Being a metropolitan, the city is filled with towering building and beaches but the sad part as with almost every Indian city
Deep Leg Vein Thrombosis (DVT): Meaning, Causes, Symptoms, Treatment, and Mor...The Lifesciences Magazine
Deep Leg Vein Thrombosis occurs when a blood clot forms in one or more of the deep veins in the legs. These clots can impede blood flow, leading to severe complications.
Deep Leg Vein Thrombosis (DVT): Meaning, Causes, Symptoms, Treatment, and Mor...
Patient Centered Care | Unit 5c Lecture
1. Patient-Centered Care
Unit 5: Patient-Provider Communication
Lecture c – Informatics Tools to Support Patient-Provider
Communications
This material (Comp 25 Unit 5) was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and
Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award
Number 90WT0006.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.
2. Patient-Provider Communication
Learning Objectives
• Objective 1: Explain the importance,
elements, and processes of patient-physician
communication (Lecture a)
• Objective 2: Discuss the concept of trust in
the context of health care interactions
(Lecture b)
• Objective 3: Describe various informatics
tools and the practical considerations to
support patient-provider communication
(Lecture c)
2
3. Physician-patient communication in
the e-Health context
5.10 Figure (Weiner, J, 2012)
Woods SS, Schwartz E, Tuepker A, Press NA, Nazi KM, Turvey CL, Nichol W.P Patient Experiences With Full Electronic
Access to Health Records and Clinical Notes Through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: Qualitative Study J
Med Internet Res 2013;15(3):e65 URL: http://www.jmir.org/2013/3/e65/
3
4. Communication
• Use of digital tools and facilitating
communication between patients,
caregivers, and health care providers to
improve data quality and access to health
care
4
5. The use of digital technology has
revolutionized how we communicate
5.11 Figure (Pew Research Center, 2011)
5
6. Connected generation: Perspectives from
tomorrow’s leaders in a digital world
• “Social media will continue to grow, both on a
personal and organizational level. The
Internet is now the new place where business
relationships are formed.” – United States
student, age 21
• “We stand on the precipice of a paradigm
shift into a fully connected society. We must
not be afraid to embrace change. Those who
can manage this will survive; those who don’t
will perish.” – United States student, age 30
• (IBM Global Business Services, 2012)
6
7. What does the data tell us?
• People are using digital and social media
to communicate more than ever before!
• Use of social media in government,
business, and health care
• By consumers and health care
practitioners
• And our communication preferences are
changing…
7
8. The mobile health (mHealth)
market will continue to grow
• New technologies
• Decreasing cost
• Increasing acceptance
• Population age
• Foundation in place
• Move to personalized care
• (Guillemi and Benedict, 2013)
8
9. mHealth as the future of health
care
• mHealth is not a separate industry, but
rather it’s the future of a health care
industry that’s evolving to care for patients
differently, putting them first to deliver
services better, faster, and less
expensively.
– (Gibbons, Wilson, Samal, et al. 2009)
9
10. General well-being motivates
health self-tracking
• 50% of consumers
track or monitor their
health, wellness, or
fitness measurements
• The old and sick often
utilize devices that
track health
measurements more
than the young and
healthy, demonstrating
adoption of this
technology for all age
groups
5.12: Figure (Manhattan Research, Cybercitizen
Health U.S., 2013) 10
11. How consumers seek out health
information
• 35% of U.S. adults say that at one time or another they have
gone online specifically to try to figure out what medical
condition they or someone else might have
– (Pew Research Center, 2013)
• One in five Internet users have consulted online reviews and
rankings of health care service providers and treatments
– (Pew Research Center, 2013)
• 18% of Internet users, or 13% of adults, have gone online to
find others who might have health concerns similar to theirs.
People living with chronic and rare conditions are significantly
more likely to do this.
– (Pew Research Center, 2011)
11
12. Examples of informatics tools to
support patient-provider
communication
• Patient portals
• Personal health records
• Online patient communities
12
13. Patient portal functionality
• Recent doctor visits
• Discharge summaries
• Medications
• Immunizations
• Allergies
• Lab results
• Exchange secure email
with health care teams
• Request prescription
refills
• Schedule non-urgent
appointments
• Check benefits and
coverage
• Update contact
information
• Make payments
• Download and
complete forms
• View educational
materials
13
14. Personal health records (PHR)
• Patient-initiated electronic record that is separate from
the EHR
• Contains information selected and added by the patient
• Allows the patient the ability to update and change their
health information at any time
• Provides the patient the ability to share this information
with anyone that they choose
• Patient may need to add health information manually
• Patient must manually update health information
• Limited ability for providers to send information directly to
PHR
14
15. Patient communities
• PatientsLikeMe® and their “Data for Good”
campaign to encourage health data
sharing to advance medicine
– More than 250,000 members are donating
their disease data to research via
PatientsLikeMe®
– To date, more than 21 million structured data
points contributed by patients about their
disease experiences
15
17. What is health literacy?
• The degree to which individuals have the
capacity to obtain, process, and
understand basic health information
needed to make appropriate health
decisions and services needed to prevent
or treat illness
– U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Health Resources and Services
Administration
17
18. The patient journey: care continuum,
literacy, and personal health
information
• Patient engagement / awareness and clinical knowledge
• Presentation and evaluation
– Symptoms, personal preferences, family history
• Diagnosis
– Patient / caregiver research
• Consideration of treatment options
– Shared decision-making
• Treatment decision
• Leverage digital / mobile communications and share data
– Adhering to / monitoring therapy
• (Rulon, 2014)
18
19. Other health literacy tools
• AHRQ’s Questions to Ask Your Doctor
• AHIP’s Choosing Wisely Doctor-Patient Lists
• AARP’s Ask the Right Questions and Get The
Most From Your Medicines
• Informed Medical Decisions Foundation’s
Shared Decision Making Resources
19
20. Patient access to their records
• Patients felt that seeing
their records:
– Positively affected
communication with
providers and the health
system
– Enhanced knowledge of
their health
– Improved self-care
– Allowed for greater
participation in the
quality of their care
– (Woods, Schwartz,
Tuepker, et al, 2013)
• Patients felt more in
control of their care and
reported increased
medication adherence
• Physicians did not report
longer visits and many
did not change
documentation content
or take longer to write
notes
• (Delbanco, Walker, Bell,
et al, 2012)
20
21. EHR information provided by the
patient can be valuable
• The longitudinal medical record (LMR) is often
incomplete
• Patient-reported data is a promising source of general
health information
• “Patients have important knowledge of their basic
health maintenance, and can and should assist
physicians in recording information. Patient access
will increase the quality of this data to help ensure that
the physician has the most comprehensive file
possible with which to work. In addition to quality
assurance, patient-provided data and patient access
to LMR data will help increase communication
between provider and patient.”
– (Wuerdeman et al., 2005)
21
22. Patient perceptions regarding
privacy and security are important
• If a person does not think that health care
providers have reasonable protections in place for
EHRs, they are:
– Over eight times more likely to have withheld
information from their provider, compared to someone
who does think there are protections
– Almost five times more likely to have withheld
information from their provider, compared to the
overall population
– (Hughes, Patel, Pritts, 2014)
• For more information on ensuring privacy and
security of shared data, please see component 22
unit 10
22
23. Culture change: physicians need
to adapt
• Dialogue
– “If you don’t mind, I am going to be typing as you speak.
I’m happy to show you what I’m writing”
– “I’m going to look up your test results. Would you like to
look at them together?”
• Caution
– Documenting socially stigmatizing health conditions
– Sensitivity to patient perceptions
• Patient engagement
– Improving management of chronic disease and mental
illness
– Patient-provider collaboration
• (White and Danis, 2013)
23
24. Themes
• Culture dominates
• “Listen first, listen fully”
• Patient engagement is a skill, not a trait
• Trust matters
• Prepared, engaged patients are a
fundamental precursor to high quality care,
lower costs, and better health
24
25. Unit 5: Patient-Provider Communication,
Summary – Lecture c, Informatics Tools to
Support Patient-Provider Communication
• Digital technology has changed how we communicate,
especially between patients and providers
• Mobile health and self-tracking of general well-being
will continue to grow
• Examples of informatics tools to support patient-
provider communication are patient portals, personal
health records, and online patient communities.
• Practical considerations for communicative informatics
and technology include access to data, health literacy,
privacy and security, and culture.
• Providing patients with access to their medical record
and the ability to contribute information could improve
their care
25
26. Unit 5 Summary: Patient-Provider
Communication
• Providers with good communication skills identify patients’
problems more accurately and their patients adjust better
psychologically and are more satisfied with their care
• Effective methods of communication skills are available and
the opportunity to practice them is essential
• Listen carefully to patients, treat them respectfully, be honest
and consistent, follow through on commitments, and have an
accepting attitude
• Digital technology has changed how we communicate,
especially between patients and providers and examples of
informatics tools to support patient-provider communication
are patient portals, personal health records, and online patient
communities
26
27. Patient-Provider Communication
References – Lecture c
References
Delbanco, T, Walker, J, Bell, SK, Darer, JD, Elmore, JG, Farag, N, Feldman, HJ, Mejilla,
R, Ngo, L, Ralston, JD, Ross, SE, Trivedi, N, Vodicka, E, & Leveille, SG. (2012).
Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes. Annals of Internal Medicine. 157(7):461-
470.http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=1363511
Gibbons, MC, Wilson, RF, Samal, L, Lehman, CU, Dickersin, K, Lehmann, HP,
Aboumatar, H, Finkelstein, J, Shelton, E, Sharma, R, & Bass, EB. (2009). Impact of
consumer health informatics applications. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 188:1-546.
Guillemi, A, & Benedict, K. (2013). mHealth trends and strategies. A special report by
netcentric strategies.
Hughes, P, Patel, V, & Pritts, J. (2014). Health care providers’ role in protecting EHRs:
implications for consumer support of EHRs, HIE and patient-provider communication
ONC Data Brief Number 15.
http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/022414_hit_attitudesaboutprivacydatabrief.p
df
IBM Global Business Services. (2012). Connected generation. Perspectives from
tomorrow’s leaders in a digital world. Insights from the 2012 IBM Global Student
Study
27
28. Patient-Provider Communication
References – Lecture c (Cont’d – 1)
References
Institute of Medicine. (2013). Partnering with patients to drive shared decisions, better
value and care improvement, meeting summary.
http://iom.edu/Reports/2013/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2013/Partnering-with-
Patients/PwP_meetingsummary.pdf
https://www.patientslikeme.com/about
https://www.patientslikeme.com/join/dataforgood
Pew Research Center. (2013). Pew Research Internet Project: health fact sheet.
http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/health-fact-sheet/
Pew Research Center. (2013). Health online 2013.
http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/
Pew Research Center. (2013). Peer-to-peer health care.
http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/peer-to-peer-health-care/
Rulon, MS. (2014). Engaging patients in their healthcare through health information:
why it’s important. Presentation. NYHIMA Conference.
White, A, & Danis, M. (2013). Enhancing patient-centered communication and
collaboration by using the electronic health record in the examination room. JAMA.
309(22).
28
29. Patient-Provider Communication
References – Lecture c (Cont’d – 2)
References
Woods, SS, Schwartz, E, Tuepke,r A, Press, NA, Nazi, KM, Turvey, CL, & Nichol, WP.
(2013). Patient experiences with full electronic access to health records and clinical
notes through the MyHealtheVet personal health record pilot: qualitative study J Med
Internet Res. 15(3):e65. http://www.jmir.org/2013/3/e65/
Wuerdeman, L, Volk, L, Pizziferrri, L, Tsurikova, R, Harris, C, Feygin, R, Epstein, M,
Meyers, K, Wald, JS, Lansky, D, & Bates, DW. (2005). How accurate is information
that patients contribute to their electronic health record? AMIA 2005 Symposium
Proceedings. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16779157?dopt=Citation
.
29
30. Patient-Provider Communication
References – Lecture c (Cont’d – 3)
Charts, Tables, Figures
5.10 Figure: Weiner, J. (2012). Figure 1. Physician / patient communication in the “e-
health” context’. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 1(33).
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461429/
5.11 Figure: Pew Research Center. (2011). Texting popular around globe.
5.12: Figure: Manhattan Research, Cybercitizen Health U.S. (2013). Reasons for
tracking health measurements.
30
31. Unit 5: Patient-Provider
Communication, Lecture c –
Informatics Tools to Support Patient-
Provider Communication
This material was developed by Columbia
University, funded by the Department of
Health and Human Services, Office of the
National Coordinator for Health Information
Technology under Award Number
90WT0006.
31
Editor's Notes
Welcome to Patient-Centered Care, Patient-Provider Communication. This is Lecture c.
The objectives for this unit, Patient-Provider Communication are: 1) Explain the importance, elements, and processes of patient-physician communication; 2) Discuss the concept of trust in the context of health care interactions; and 3) Describe various informatics tools and the practical considerations to support patient-provider communication. In this lecture, we will talk about informatics tools for patient-provider communication.
This slide presents a graphic model of the digital practice infrastructure surrounding both providers and patients. This conceptual model acknowledges that the provider is no longer just a single physician or doctor group, but usually a multidisciplinary team that is either physically or virtually integrated into an organized, structured delivery system. Surrounding the provider and consumer concentric rings, the slide lays out a spectrum of Intertwined types of e-health communication tools that support patient-provider communication.
Communication and information technology is changing rapidly worldwide. This digital revolution will have a profound impact on how physicians and health care delivery organizations interact with patients and populations. Over the coming decade, face-to-face patient / doctor contacts will become less common and exchanges between consumers and providers will increasingly be mediated by electronic devices.
The use of digital technology has revolutionized how we communicate, providing access to health information from virtually any location at any time. 2011 research shows that text messaging has been emerging as the preferred electronic communication venue, both increasing availability of communication, but limiting the ability to provide the details of communication that are associated with a verbal conversation.
In the recent IBM study, five out of ten students said they interact online with people they don’t already know – in other words, they use social media to reconfigure and expand their social networks into totally new areas. In fact, even before finishing college, students are joining professional social networks such as LinkedIn to establish and benefit from professional relationships.
People are communicating through digital and social media more than ever. Even government agencies use Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Flicker, and other social media. Digital and social media are being used by consumers and health care providers, but communication preferences are changing. According to the Manhattan Research Cybercitizen Health® 2012 Study, the number of U.S. adults age 18 years and older using digital technology for health information has increased from 61 million in 2011 to 75 million in 2012. We are undergoing a digital revolution.
The mobile health market will continue to grow due to the following factors, according to Guillemi and Benedict in 2013. There are new technologies, such as smartphones, remote patient monitoring, and social media. There is a decreasing cost and increasing acceptance of mobile health. The population itself is also a factor because the global population is aging, the median population age is increasing, and health is becoming more about chronic, instead of acute, diseases. Additionally, there is a foundation in place with a concept of “care everywhere” taking root.
Healthcare is moving towards a precision-based model—or ‘personalized medicine’. As a result of greater understanding of the human genome, together with other personalised technologies, the industry will likely transform—as have many other industries—to one that is predictive, personalized, participatory, and preventive. mHealth will be a major factor in providing personal toolkits that will ultimately help those manage predicted vulnerabilities, chronic illness, and episodic acute conditions. Enabled by technology, connectivity and data, mass customization is on the horizon allowing mHealth solutions to flourish.
Expectations are high that mobile technology will help to increase access to care in emerging markets and transform the developed world’s costly healthcare behemoths into less expensive, prevention-based and patient-focused systems. The surveys conducted for this research program found that although patients see relatively modest change so far, large numbers expect that mHealth will have a significant impact on how care is delivered in the next three years. The use of mobile health tracking devices among both the young and healthy, and the old and sick demonstrates high motivation to maintain or improve general well-being or prevent adverse health incidents.
35% of U.S. adults say that at one time or another they have gone online specifically to try to figure out what medical condition they or someone else might have. One in five Internet users have consulted online reviews and rankings of health care service providers and treatments. Thirteen percent of adults have gone online to find others who might have health concerns similar to theirs. People living with chronic and rare conditions are significantly more likely to do this.
Some common examples of informatics tools to support patient-provider communication are patient portals, personal health records, and online communities. We will now talk about each and some other units in this component may also mention these tools.
A patient portal is a secure online website that gives patients convenient 24-hour access to personal health information from anywhere with an Internet connection. Using a secure username and password, patients can view health information depicted on this slide, such as recent doctor visits, lab results, and educational materials. With patient portal implementation, a health care organization can enhance patient-provider communication, empower patients, support care between visits, and, most importantly, improve patient outcomes.
The personal health record (PHR) is a patient-initiated electronic record that is separate from the EHR and contains information selected and added by the patient. The PHR allows the patient the ability to update and change their health information at any time, and provides the patient the ability to share this information with anyone that they choose to share with. The PHR provides a patient the most control of their health information. There are some drawbacks to this technology. Although some medical devices and wearable trackers can feed data into a PHR, very few electronic health record vendors currently interface into the PHR, leaving the patient responsible for entry and updates to information. In addition, providers cannot send information directly into most PHR products, leaving the patient to enter the updates.
Online patient communities provide technology tools that support patient to patient communication, and provide helpful information to guide patients in more effective communication with their providers. The web site PatientsLikeMe, a site dedicated to providing a space for over 250,000 members to communicate with each other and share personal health experiences, launched a 2014 campaign called “Data for Good”. This campaign is designed to encourage health data sharing to advance research, and to change medicine. In a recent study focused on sleep issues, PatientsLikeMe was able to pull from its platform of more than five-years’ worth of data to analyze over 184,000 symptom reports. The company was then able to run an additional member survey to collect additional data, receiving more than 5,000 responses in less than two weeks.
There are some practical considerations for supporting informatics and technology to facilitate patient-provider communication. Access to information, health literacy, privacy and security, and culture change are key factors and will be discussed in this lecture.
Empowered patients and caregivers can share decision-making with their health care providers through better health literacy and input to their medical record throughout the care continuum. Health literacy is defined by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as “the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information needed to make appropriate health decisions and services needed to prevent or treat illness”.
This slide represents the range of tools supporting patient-provide communication along the continuum of patient care, with the use of digital and mobile communications used after the active phase of patient care to monitor and promote adherence to therapy.
There are resources on health literacy from a number of organizations such as AHRQ, AARP, and the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation.
Now, patients may have access to their records. A research study by Woods, Schwartz, Tuepker, et al in 2013, identified four themes that characterized patient experiences with reading the full complement of their health information. When seeing their records, patients felt that their communication with providers and health care systems was positively affected. Access also enhanced knowledge of their own health, improved self-care, and allowed for greater participation in the quality of their care, such as follow-up of abnormal test results or decision-making on when to seek care. While some patients felt that seeing previously undisclosed information, derogatory language, or inconsistencies in their notes caused challenges, they overwhelmingly felt that having more, rather than less, of their health record information provided benefits. Another study looked at patient- and provider-related outcomes after the implementation of OpenNotes. What researchers found was that most patients felt more in control after reading their doctors’ notes. Also, a majority reported increased medication adherence. Less than five percent of physicians reported longer visits and no more than a third of providers reported changing their documentation content or that it took longer to write notes. At the end of the experiment, 99 percent of the patients wanted OpenNotes to continue and no doctor elected to stop OpenNotes.
Not only can it be helpful for patients to access their health record, but patients’ information that they contribute could also be valuable. This is because the longitudinal medical record, or LMR, is often incomplete. So patient-reported data is a promising source of general health information. They can provide information about tests and quality of life, for example. Patients should have access to their information, assist with recording information, and help with quality assurance of the information. By doing this, it will help increase communication between patients and providers.
Privacy and security of health information are important, but also how patients perceive such information is protected is also essential. According to a study done by Hughes, Patel, and Pritts in 2014, individuals who strongly disagree that health care providers have reasonable protections in place for EHRs are over 8 times more likely to have withheld information from their provider compared to those who strongly agree. Compared to the overall population, individuals who strongly disagree that health care providers have reasonable protections in place for EHRs are almost 5 times more likely to have withheld information from their provider. So if a person does not believe that their health information is protected for privacy and security, they are less likely to share information. For more information on ensuring the privacy and security of information shared, please see component 22, unit 10.
Introduction of electronic means of promoting patient-provider communication resulted in culture change and a need for clinicians to adopt to the expectations of new generation of health consumers. For example, a provider could say, “If you don’t mind, I am going to be typing as you speak. I’m happy to show you what I’m writing” or “I’m going to look up your test results. Would you like to look at them together?”. It is important to consider how socially-stigmatizing health conditions are documented and to be sensitive to patient perceptions. However, by engaging the patient to communicate with the provider, it could improve management of chronic disease and mental illness and encourage patient-provider collaboration.
This slide represents major themes to address when electronic tools for patient-provider communication are being implemented. Partnering with patients represents a significant change in culture that must be addressed during each contact between provider and patient. Listening to the patient allows them the opportunity to participate in their care, and can provide information and insights that may not be gained when talking. Both patients and providers need to learn the skills of engaging with each other, a significant part of changing the health care culture. Patient engagement is also based on trust between the two parties, and as a result, patients will become more engaged and invested in improving their own health.
This concludes Lecture c of Patient-Provider Communication. To summarize, digital technology changed how patients and providers communicate. Mobile health and self-tracking of general well-being are examples and contributors of this manifestation. We talked about examples of informatics tools to support patient-provider communication, such as patient portals, personal health records, and online patient communities. There are practical considerations for implementing such tools like, data access, health literacy, privacy and security, and culture. However, providing patients access to their medical record and collaborating with them to contribute to their medical record could improve their care.
This concludes Unit 5, Patient-Provider Communication. The summary of this unit is providers with good communication skills identify patients’ problems more accurately and their patients adjust better psychologically and are more satisfied with their care. Effective methods of communication skills are available and the opportunity to practice them is essential. Listen carefully to patients, treat them respectfully, be honest and consistent, follow through on commitments, and have an accepting attitude. Digital technology has changed how we communicate, especially between patients and providers and examples of informatics tools to support patient-provider communication are patient portals, personal health records, and online patient communities.