STRUCTURE OF THESPECIFICATION
FIELD OF THE
INVENTION
STATE OF THE
ART IN THE
FIELD
OBJECTS OF
THE
INVENTION
SUMMARY OR
STATEMENT OF
THE
INVENTION
DETAILED
DESCRIPTION
FO THE
INVENTION
BRIEF
DESCRIPTION
OF THE
DRAWING
SCOPE OF THE
INVETION
CLAIMS ABSTRACT
4.
FIELD OF THEINVENTION
Invention and brief technology; scope of the invention
The statement should begin with
“The invention relates to…..”
“Another invention relates to …..”
“Most particularly”
“ The advantage of the invention is”
To avoid: details of the invention and limitations
5.
STATE OF THEART- BACKGROUND ART-
PRIOR ART
Similar to review of literature.
Significance of the findings with earlier research.
National and international finding to be enclosed.
Patent search from Patent search tools to be included.
“One of the Prior art is …”
To avoid: limitations in the scope.
Should not label anything as invention.
6.
OBJECTS/ OBJECTIVES OFTHE
INVENTION
Objectives of the invention- achieved
Highlights the existing technology- related to prior art.
“The principal object of the invention is ….”
“Another object of the inventions is ….”
“A future object of the invention is …..”
To avoid: conflicting terms
Narrow objectives
Complete the line by ‘Objects of the invention are not limited to the specific
features or acts described in the description of the drawings’
7.
SUMMARY/ STATEMENT OFTHE
INVENTION
Entire invention subject matter
Readable- non- legal form of independent claim
“According to the basic aspect of the proposed work ….”
“It is another aspect of the present work ….”
To avoid: advantages and limitations
8.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OFTHE DRAWINGS
Important for patent specification.
Sketches/ rough drawings
“the invention was related to…”
“Figure 1 illustrates”
“According to one embodiment of the present invention is”
9.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OFTHE
INVENTION
The invention experiments.
Tools utilized for the study.
Step- wise protocol.
Chemicals used.
Micro- organisms used- Patent deposit- MTCC/ NCCS
10.
CLAIMS
Significant legalscope.
“Define the matter; clear & concise; supported by the description”
Transitional phrase: open- ended: comprising; close- ended: consisting of.
Two parts claim/ improvement claims: Jepson claim. Ex: a pencil having an eraser is
improved with a light attached.
Means- plus function claim: achieving a function. Ex: A system for controlling the
bandwidth in a local area compressing: means for maintain database for
determining the bandwidth utilization of each user.
Markush claim: alternative embodiment- Ex: An alcohol selected from the group
consists of methanol, ethanol and isopropanol.
Dependent claim
Multiple dependent claim
Apparatus claim
Process claim
Product by process claim
Software claim
Composition claim