This document provides an overview of basics for drafting patent specifications, including:
1) The main components of a specification include the title, preamble, technical field, background, objects, description of drawings, detailed description, claims, and abstract.
2) Key details for each component are outlined, such as what should be included in the title, technical field, background, objects, description of drawings, and claims.
3) Tips for drafting claims are also provided, including how to draft independent versus dependent claims and multiple dependent claims.
The presentation herein, on Basics of Specification Drafting, was delivered by Mr. Somashekar Ramakrishna at the National Law School of India University, Bangalore, for Senior Officials of the Ministry of MSME, Government of India. Starting with specification contents, the presentation covers drafting guidelines, claim drafting basics and examples. For more information about the presentation or the event, you may contact the Sinapse team at sinapse@bananaip.com.
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414 /24/34
Patent: A presentation on "Patent Drafting" by Ms. Vinita Radhakrishnan - Ban...BananaIP Counsels
Patent: A presentation on "Patent Drafting" by Ms. Vinita Radhakrishnan - BananaIP
BananaIP Counsels, formerly Brain League IP Services, founded in 2004 at the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Bangalore’s incubation center (NSRCEL), is recognized as an IP/Patent trailblazer in India. The firm’s mission is to help clients maximize business value from their Intellectual Property (IP)/Patents, and gain competitive advantage in the market place. In its evolution from Brain League, BananaIP carries forward the firm’s core values – Merger of Technology,Management and Law, Swift Adaptation to changes in competitive environment, and business driven approach to Intellectual Property (IP)/Patent Services.
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414 /24/34
Presentation on Patent DNA by Nitin Nair, Brain League IP Services Now BananaIPBananaIP Counsels
Presentation on Patent DNA by Nitin Nair, Brain League IP Services Now BananaIP
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414 /24/34
NEWS FLASH: //Check our latest course offering on Patent-Business-Strategy over at Udemy here: http://www.udemy.com/patent-business-strategy/ with a 50 per cent launch discount //
This a discussion on patent infringement for academic purpose. Please do NOT consider this legal advice.
[Some material has not been updated for recent changes, so use it at your own risk]
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice.
NEWS FLASH: //Check our latest course offering on Patent-Business-Strategy over at Udemy here: http://www.udemy.com/patent-business-strategy/ with a 50 per cent launch discount //
A general academic discussion about doctrine of equivalence in US, Japan and other countries as applied by courts in patent infringement cases. [Some material has not been updated for recent changes, so use it at your own risk]
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice.
The presentation herein, on Basics of Specification Drafting, was delivered by Mr. Somashekar Ramakrishna at the National Law School of India University, Bangalore, for Senior Officials of the Ministry of MSME, Government of India. Starting with specification contents, the presentation covers drafting guidelines, claim drafting basics and examples. For more information about the presentation or the event, you may contact the Sinapse team at sinapse@bananaip.com.
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414 /24/34
Patent: A presentation on "Patent Drafting" by Ms. Vinita Radhakrishnan - Ban...BananaIP Counsels
Patent: A presentation on "Patent Drafting" by Ms. Vinita Radhakrishnan - BananaIP
BananaIP Counsels, formerly Brain League IP Services, founded in 2004 at the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Bangalore’s incubation center (NSRCEL), is recognized as an IP/Patent trailblazer in India. The firm’s mission is to help clients maximize business value from their Intellectual Property (IP)/Patents, and gain competitive advantage in the market place. In its evolution from Brain League, BananaIP carries forward the firm’s core values – Merger of Technology,Management and Law, Swift Adaptation to changes in competitive environment, and business driven approach to Intellectual Property (IP)/Patent Services.
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414 /24/34
Presentation on Patent DNA by Nitin Nair, Brain League IP Services Now BananaIPBananaIP Counsels
Presentation on Patent DNA by Nitin Nair, Brain League IP Services Now BananaIP
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414 /24/34
NEWS FLASH: //Check our latest course offering on Patent-Business-Strategy over at Udemy here: http://www.udemy.com/patent-business-strategy/ with a 50 per cent launch discount //
This a discussion on patent infringement for academic purpose. Please do NOT consider this legal advice.
[Some material has not been updated for recent changes, so use it at your own risk]
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice.
NEWS FLASH: //Check our latest course offering on Patent-Business-Strategy over at Udemy here: http://www.udemy.com/patent-business-strategy/ with a 50 per cent launch discount //
A general academic discussion about doctrine of equivalence in US, Japan and other countries as applied by courts in patent infringement cases. [Some material has not been updated for recent changes, so use it at your own risk]
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice.
Patents 101 Part 4 - Applying for a PatentJane Lambert
The handout to the fourth module of my introduction to English patent law. The procedure for applying for a UK patent and European patent (UK) and making PCT applications. Appeals to the Comptroller in the UK and the Boards of Appeal in the EPO. Entitlement and inventorship disputes,
This is the handout for the final module of my introduction to English patent law. It analyses s.60 (1) of the Patents Act 1977 in the light of s.125 (1). It considers para 4 of the Part 63 Practice Direction. It discusses Lord Diplock's judgment in Catnic It mentions s.125 (3) of the Patents Act, art 69 (1) EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation. It analyses Improver, Kirin Amgen, Eli Lilly v Actavis and Icescape. It discusses possible defences and threats actions.
The handout for the third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrpssan tests.
The handout for the second module of my introduction to English patent law. This covers the sources of law, both legislation and the case law. The module focuses on the Patents Act 1977 and the European Patent Convention. It also introduces readers to the main sets of law reports for patent law, the Reports of Patent Cases ("RPC") and the Fleet Street Reports ("FSR").
The handout for the first module of my an introduction to English patent law. A patent is defined as "a monopoly of an invention". That proposition is unpacked to consider what is meant by "monopoly" and what is meant by "invention". These notes discuss the inventor's bargain with the public and its reflection in the specification, They explore what is meant by the teaching of the patent in the description and the monopoly in the claims,
The third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrossan tests.
The following presentation titled “Basics of Specification Drafting”, was delivered on 18th December, 2016 by Mr. Somashekar Ramakrishna, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, at National Law School of India University, Bangalore (NLSIU) to the Post Graduate Diploma Intellectual Property Rights Law PGDIPR students as a part of their course.
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414/24/34
Patent specification is a document through which an inventor discloses the details of his invention in exchange for the exclusive rights awarded by the government. From a broader perspective, the government expects a patent specification to disclose the invention details so that any person from the public (after the patent expires) can make and/or practice the invention thereby meeting the objective of the Patent law.
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414/24/34
Patents 101 Part 4 - Applying for a PatentJane Lambert
The handout to the fourth module of my introduction to English patent law. The procedure for applying for a UK patent and European patent (UK) and making PCT applications. Appeals to the Comptroller in the UK and the Boards of Appeal in the EPO. Entitlement and inventorship disputes,
This is the handout for the final module of my introduction to English patent law. It analyses s.60 (1) of the Patents Act 1977 in the light of s.125 (1). It considers para 4 of the Part 63 Practice Direction. It discusses Lord Diplock's judgment in Catnic It mentions s.125 (3) of the Patents Act, art 69 (1) EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation. It analyses Improver, Kirin Amgen, Eli Lilly v Actavis and Icescape. It discusses possible defences and threats actions.
The handout for the third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrpssan tests.
The handout for the second module of my introduction to English patent law. This covers the sources of law, both legislation and the case law. The module focuses on the Patents Act 1977 and the European Patent Convention. It also introduces readers to the main sets of law reports for patent law, the Reports of Patent Cases ("RPC") and the Fleet Street Reports ("FSR").
The handout for the first module of my an introduction to English patent law. A patent is defined as "a monopoly of an invention". That proposition is unpacked to consider what is meant by "monopoly" and what is meant by "invention". These notes discuss the inventor's bargain with the public and its reflection in the specification, They explore what is meant by the teaching of the patent in the description and the monopoly in the claims,
The third of my modules on English patent law. This one deals with patentability or the conditions for the grant of a patent, namely novelty, an inventive step, utility and no exclusion from patentability. On novelty, readers are introduced to the concept of the "state of the art" and the test of novelty in General Tire and Rubber v Firestone. As to inventiveness, they are introduced to the concepts of the skilled addressee and common general knowledge and the Supreme Court's decision in Actavis v ICOS. Finally, on excluded matter there is a very close look at the Aerotel and Macrossan tests.
The following presentation titled “Basics of Specification Drafting”, was delivered on 18th December, 2016 by Mr. Somashekar Ramakrishna, Senior Partner, BananaIP Counsels, at National Law School of India University, Bangalore (NLSIU) to the Post Graduate Diploma Intellectual Property Rights Law PGDIPR students as a part of their course.
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414/24/34
Patent specification is a document through which an inventor discloses the details of his invention in exchange for the exclusive rights awarded by the government. From a broader perspective, the government expects a patent specification to disclose the invention details so that any person from the public (after the patent expires) can make and/or practice the invention thereby meeting the objective of the Patent law.
Contact Us for Intellectual Property Services
BananaIP Counsels
Regd Office
No.40,3rd Main Road,JC Industrial Estate,
Kanakapura Road,Bangalore – 560 062.
Email: contact@bananaip.com
Telephone: +91-80-26860414/24/34
Partners David Schmidt, Ph.D. and Jessica Achtsam presented strategic considerations for drafting and prosecuting patent claims directed to mechanical and medical device inventions, before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The presentation covered the following topics: review of written description and enablement standards under Section 112 to support mechanical and medical device-related claims; illustrative claim drafting examples and best practices; and best practices for defining claim scope.
Speakers: David Schmidt, Ph.D. and Jessica Achtsam
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
2. Object of Patent Law
• The object of Patent Law is to encourage scientific research,
new technology and industrial progress. The price of the grant
of the monopoly is the disclosure of the invention at the
Patent Office, which after the expiry of the fixed period of the
monopoly, passes into the public domain. Biswanath Prasad
Radhey Shyam vs Hindustan Metal Industries on 13 December, 1978
SPECIFICATION
3. Form of Application
• Patent Application
– Form of Application
• Provisional Application (Provisional Specification +
Filing documents)
• Non Provisional/Complete Application (Complete
specification + Filing documents)
• Priority Date- filing date of the first application in a
chain of applications
4. In the Indian Patent Act
• Section 7(4)- Every such application….shall be accompanied
by a provisional or complete specification
• Section 10(1) Every application…shall describe the invention
and…begin with a title…
• Section 10 (4)- every complete specification shall
• Fully and particularly describe the invention
• Disclose the best method
• End with a claim
• Be accompanied by an abstract
• And so on….
5. Specification Contents
• Title
• Preamble
• Technical field
• Background
• Objects
• Brief description of the drawings
• Detailed description
• Claims
• Abstract
• Drawings
6. Example Invention
• Coffee dispensing machine in which a
crusher/grinder for grinding coffee beans is
included as a novel and inventive concept
7. Title
1. Should be provided in the first page of Form-2
2. Should indicate the subject matter
3. Should not be more than 15 words
4. Should be free from fancy expression or
ambiguity
5. Inventor’ s name, the word “patent”, words in
other languages and so on should not be used
8. Title
6. Should correspond to the broadest claim
7. Should embrace all variants of the invention
(apparatus and method)
Title for our Invention?
“Apparatus and method for dispensing coffee”
“Coffee dispensing Machine and method of
dispensing coffee”
9. Preamble
• Should be provided in the first page of Form-2
• Provisional Specification
– The following specification describes the invention
• Complete Specification
– The following specification particularly describes
the invention and the manner in which it is to be
performed
10. Technical Field
• Provided in page 2 of Form-2
• Should indicate general art to which the
invention belongs
• Areas of application may be mentioned
Technical field for our invention?
“The embodiments herein generally relate to
dispensing machines and more particularly to an
apparatus and method for dispensing coffee”
11. Background
• Distinguish the invention from what is already
existing in the field
• Should not describe the claimed Invention
• Should use drawings to explain any prior art
• If the latest art in the field (prior to the
invention at hand) is Applicants own work ,
then such work should not be described here
• Do not exaggerate the disadvantages of prior
art
12. Background
• Do not criticize the prior art
• Example
Mesh layer
Guard
panel
• Specification:
– Composite guard includes guard
panel and mesh layer attached by
continuous fusing or
heat/ultrasonic welding
– criticized attachment means in
prior art
• Background:“[t]he attachment
means used in other prior art gutter
guards is generally less effective, and
more costly, time consuming, and
labor intensive”
13. Background
• Claim:
– Continuous heat weld...connecting said mesh layer to said guard
panel
• Accused product: Mesh screen attached to guard panel by
adhesive/hot glue
• Held: No literal infringement and no infringement under DOE
14. Background
• Background for our invention?
“…At present, coffee beans are crushed/ground separately to
obtain coffee powder. Thereafter, the coffee powder is
packaged and brought to be fed into the coffee dispensing
machine. The aforementioned process is tedious and time
consuming and further, the baldes/crushing elements of a
typical crusher or a grinder are not appropriate enough to
crush the coffee beans to the desired size. Therefore, having
a crusher/ grinder integral to the coffee dispensing machine
is desirable…”
15. Background
“…In the existing coffee dispensing machine as shown
in Fig. _, powdered coffee is provided manually
through an inlet i of the machine…”
16. Objects
• Should set forth broad objectives
• Acts as a pointer while drafting detailed
description
Objects for our invention?
“An object of the embodiments of this invention is to provide an
apparatus for crushing coffee beans and dispensing coffee.”
“Another object of the embodiments of this invention is to provide a
method for crushing coffee beans and dispensing coffee.”
17. Brief Description of Drawings
• Should clearly indicate that the drawings are
showing embodiments of the invention and
not the invention itself
• Should start with “…The embodiments of the
invention is illustrated in the accompanying
drawings, throughout which like reference letters
indicate corresponding parts in the various figures.
The embodiments herein will be better understood
from the following description with reference to the
drawings, in which:…”
18. Brief Description of Drawings
Brief description of the drawings for our
invention?
“Fig 1 shows a coffee dispensing machine according
to an embodiment of the present invention; and
Fig. 2 is a flow chart showing the process of
dispensing coffee.”
19. Detailed Description
• Should start with the following, or similar paragraph:
The embodiments herein and the various features and advantageous
details thereof are explained more fully with reference to the non-
limiting embodiments that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings
and detailed in the following description. Descriptions of well-known
components and processing techniques are omitted so as to not
unnecessarily obscure the embodiments herein. The examples used
herein are intended merely to facilitate an understanding of ways in
which the embodiments herein may be practiced and to further enable
those of skill in the art to practice the embodiments herein. Accordingly,
the examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the
embodiments herein.
20. Detailed Description
• Should provide sufficient details of the
invention
• The making and using of the invention should
be explained in depth so as to enable a person
having ordinary skill in the art to practice the
invention
• Details of the invention should be explained
with reference to drawings
• Should disclose best mode
21. Detailed Description
• The terminology should be consistent
• Should be well organized and easily
understandable
• Start with a general overview and proceed
with increasing levels of detail
• Should set forth several, if not all, alternative
working examples even if only one
embodiment is illustrated in the drawings
22. Detailed Description
• Detailed description for our invention?
“… the apparatus 100 as shown in Fig 1 includes a
housing 10. The housing 10 is provided with a
first hopper 12a and a second hopper 12b on a
top portion thereof. The housing 10 is adapted to
receive a first container 14a, a second container
14b and a collector 16 and a dispenser 18. The
dispenser 18 includes a plurality of outlets 18o.
……..”
23. Claims
• Should start in a different page
• Should start with Preamble I/We Claim
• Define the scope of protection
• Every claim has a date associated with it
• Every claim is an invention
• What is not claimed in the “claims” stands
disclaimed
24. Claims
• Parts of a claim
– Preamble
– Transitional phrase
– Body
Example Preamble Transitional Phrase
A system for……., said system comprising:
element A;
element B; and Body
element C.
25. Claim Format
• Independent claim
– Stand alone
– usually broad
Example
1. A system for….., said system comprising:
element A;
element B; and
element C.
26. Claim Format
• Dependent claim
– Dependent on independent claim or another
dependent claim
– Narrow scope
Example
1. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein
element A comprises element D.
27. Claim format
• Multiple dependent claim
– Refers back to more than one claim in alternative
– Narrow scope
Example
3. The system as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein
element A further comprises element E.
28. Claim drafting-Practical Tips
• Draft a broadest independent claim with at
least one novel point and then proceed with
drafting dependent claims
• Do not include unnecessary limitation in the
independent claim
• Claim an apparatus in non-operational state
• Do not include multiple dependent claims
29. Claims
Example:
Provisional specification was filed disclosing elements A B and C
on March 2, 2015. Complete specification will be filed on
March 2, 2016 disclosing elements D and E along with
elements A,B and C.
1. Can the complete specification claim priority from provisional
specification?
2. What is the priority date of a claim claiming elements A B and
C?
3. What is the priority date of a claim claiming elements D and
E?
4. What is the priority date of a claim claiming elements A, B, C,
D and E?
30. Claims
• Example
1. A chair comprising a seat and a back rest.
Said chair further having four legs.
1.A chair comprising:
a seat;
a backrest; and
at least one leg.
31. Claims
• Example:
1. A fan comprising:
a rotating hub; and
three wings attached to said hub.
1.A fan comprising:
a hub configured to rotate; and
at least one wing attached to said hub.
33. Abstract
• Should be in a separate sheet
• Start with the title of the invention
• Should not exceed 150 words
• Should indicate the figure which needs to be
published with it
34. Drawings
• Should be in a separate sheet
• Should be accurately referenced and
described
• Should show every feature of the invention
35. Drafting Approach
• Title
• Sequence of drawings
• First draft of Claims
• Technical field
• Background
• Object
• Brief description of drawings
• Detailed description
• Final claims
• Abstract
36. THANK YOU
For further information contact
rsshekar@bananaip.com
and/or visit
www.bananaip.com
Blog: www.sinapseblog.com