2013 Florida Legislative Summary - Environmental and Water BillsThomas F. Mullin
The document summarizes key bills passed by the 2013 Florida legislature related to water resources, environmental regulation, and land use. Major topics included expanding funding for Everglades restoration, establishing numeric nutrient criteria, regulating onsite sewage systems, facilitating public-private partnerships, and reforming aspects of water management and permitting.
This document provides a history of stormwater regulation in the United States from the 1970s to present. It establishes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1970 to regulate water pollution and passage of the Clean Water Act in 1972 granting the EPA authority to regulate water discharges. The Water Quality Act of 1987 provided the basis for how stormwater is currently regulated and in 1990 the EPA began regulating stormwater at industrial facilities nationwide. The document also discusses state regulatory authorities in Texas, requirements for Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plans, and risks of non-compliance with environmental regulations.
Presentation slides from a professional development seminar on the industrial multisector general permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
In June 2010, EPA proposed a rule to regulate coal combustion residuals (“CCRs”) under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). After a lengthy delay, the proposed rule, which set forth two options for the regulation of CCRs, is expected to be finalized by the end of this year.
SCIED 703_Environmental Water Laws (DAVID).pptxJullinaDavid4
The Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 (Republic Act No. 9275) aims to protect the country's water bodies from pollution. It establishes a system of wastewater management and sets up governing boards to manage water quality. It requires permits for wastewater discharge and prohibits acts like releasing untreated wastewater. It also provides for penalties for violations, designates implementing agencies, and calls for programs on sewage management and wastewater charging to discourage pollution.
In this presentation, FMC’s Bernard Roth outlines the current trends in energy regulatory law. The presentation includes the following topics:
- Trends in Facilities Regulation
- Alberta Non-Utility Oil and Gas Facilities
- AER Structure
- Responsible Energy Development
- Federal Budget Legislative Changes
- Federal Fisheries Act
- Navigable Waters Protection Act
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
- Trends in Utilities Regulation
- Performance Based Regulation for Alberta Utilities
This document summarizes a presentation given at the 2015 Texas Water Conservation Association annual convention about aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in Texas. There are currently only 3 active ASR projects in Texas, while over 130 exist in the US. The presentation discussed the benefits of ASR including seasonal water storage and drought management. It also provided an overview of the history of ASR legislation in Texas and current efforts to pass a bill based on recommendations from the TWCA to clarify regulations and encourage more ASR project development to help meet the state's future water needs.
2013 Florida Legislative Summary - Environmental and Water BillsThomas F. Mullin
The document summarizes key bills passed by the 2013 Florida legislature related to water resources, environmental regulation, and land use. Major topics included expanding funding for Everglades restoration, establishing numeric nutrient criteria, regulating onsite sewage systems, facilitating public-private partnerships, and reforming aspects of water management and permitting.
This document provides a history of stormwater regulation in the United States from the 1970s to present. It establishes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1970 to regulate water pollution and passage of the Clean Water Act in 1972 granting the EPA authority to regulate water discharges. The Water Quality Act of 1987 provided the basis for how stormwater is currently regulated and in 1990 the EPA began regulating stormwater at industrial facilities nationwide. The document also discusses state regulatory authorities in Texas, requirements for Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plans, and risks of non-compliance with environmental regulations.
Presentation slides from a professional development seminar on the industrial multisector general permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
In June 2010, EPA proposed a rule to regulate coal combustion residuals (“CCRs”) under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). After a lengthy delay, the proposed rule, which set forth two options for the regulation of CCRs, is expected to be finalized by the end of this year.
SCIED 703_Environmental Water Laws (DAVID).pptxJullinaDavid4
The Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 (Republic Act No. 9275) aims to protect the country's water bodies from pollution. It establishes a system of wastewater management and sets up governing boards to manage water quality. It requires permits for wastewater discharge and prohibits acts like releasing untreated wastewater. It also provides for penalties for violations, designates implementing agencies, and calls for programs on sewage management and wastewater charging to discourage pollution.
In this presentation, FMC’s Bernard Roth outlines the current trends in energy regulatory law. The presentation includes the following topics:
- Trends in Facilities Regulation
- Alberta Non-Utility Oil and Gas Facilities
- AER Structure
- Responsible Energy Development
- Federal Budget Legislative Changes
- Federal Fisheries Act
- Navigable Waters Protection Act
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
- Trends in Utilities Regulation
- Performance Based Regulation for Alberta Utilities
This document summarizes a presentation given at the 2015 Texas Water Conservation Association annual convention about aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in Texas. There are currently only 3 active ASR projects in Texas, while over 130 exist in the US. The presentation discussed the benefits of ASR including seasonal water storage and drought management. It also provided an overview of the history of ASR legislation in Texas and current efforts to pass a bill based on recommendations from the TWCA to clarify regulations and encourage more ASR project development to help meet the state's future water needs.
The document summarizes recent regulatory actions, legislation, and legal cases related to water regulation. It notes that three oil production facilities in Louisiana were fined in August 2012 for violations of SPCC regulations, including failures to conduct inspections, provide documentation of training, and ensure adequate secondary containment. It also references two bills in Congress related to water regulation and summarizes three legal cases, including one upholding imprisonment and fines for Clean Water Act violations.
This document provides an overview of changing federal and state water regulations and how they affect construction projects. It discusses the Clean Water Act and defines Waters of the United States (WUS), explaining how the CWA regulates WUS at construction sites through Section 404 permitting. It also describes how Maryland regulations facilitate local ordinances and adds additional criteria beyond federal rules. The document summarizes key terms, permitting processes, and best management practices for complying with stormwater management requirements that integrate ecological and engineering standards to protect water resources.
The document summarizes the history and evolution of stormwater management regulations in the United States from the 1940s to present. It discusses the key laws passed including the Clean Water Act and its amendments. It describes the development of NPDES permitting programs for municipal separate storm sewer systems and the establishment of effluent limitation guidelines and best management practices for stormwater. It also discusses the concept of "maximum extent practicable" in regulating stormwater discharges.
Warren Formo, Joe Smentek - Water Regulations Update: Waters of the United St...John Blue
Water Regulations Update: Waters of the United States and Buffer Strips - Warren Formo, Minnesota Agricultural Water Resource Center; Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Research and Promotion Council, from the 2016 Minnesota Pork Congress, January 18 - 20, 2016, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
More presentations at http://www.swinecast.com/2016-minnesota-pork-congress
Environmental Issues in Federal Permitting for Energy ProjectsWinston & Strawn LLP
The document summarizes a presentation on emerging issues in federal permitting for energy projects. It discusses challenges with assessing the environmental impacts of transmission lines under NEPA when generation and transmission facilities have different owners. It also addresses uncertainties caused by endangered species listing decisions. Recent regulatory developments discussed include amendments to incidental take permitting and the waters of the United States rule. The presentation concludes with updates on EPA's greenhouse gas rules and new CEQ guidance on climate change reviews and programmatic NEPA analyses.
This document provides a summary of groundwater-related bills passed during the 84th Regular Session of the Texas Legislature. Key bills addressed desired future conditions appeals, aquifer storage and recovery permitting, brackish groundwater production zones, permit renewals with groundwater conservation districts, GCD board member liability, water well driller apprenticeships, and disclosure requirements for property sellers about GCDs. Other bills addressed TWDB aquifer mapping, ownership of groundwater rights, and GCD creation and boundary expansions.
Hieb, Wendy, IDNR, Hot Topics in NPDES Permitting, MECC, 2016, Overland ParkKevin Perry
This document summarizes hot topics in NPDES permitting in Iowa, including: updating water quality standards; renewing general permits 5 and 7; creating new general permits 8 and 9; implementing the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy; addressing temperature limits and 316(b) cooling water intake requirements; and complying with new steam electric effluent guidelines. It provides details on permit inventories, rulemaking timelines, and challenges associated with implementing various permitting programs and regulatory requirements in Iowa.
This document summarizes a presentation on groundwater conservation districts and legislation in Texas. It discusses the role and history of GCDs, key court cases around groundwater ownership and takings, and recent legislation around joint planning, brackish groundwater production, and other GCD regulations. Key bills in the current legislative session aim to streamline permitting, require seller disclosures, and designate brackish groundwater production zones with limited oversight. Outstanding legal questions remain around what constitutes regulatory takings of groundwater rights.
This document provides an overview of Maryland water laws and regulations, stormwater management, and best management practices. It discusses four categories of effects from development on hydrology, geomorphology, habitat, and water quality. It describes regulatory definitions of waters, permitting criteria for impacts and regulated waters from various agencies, water quality standards, stormwater management criteria and practices, and the differences between erosion and sediment control and stormwater management.
The document summarizes key US regulations around water quality:
1) The Clean Water Act is the cornerstone of US water quality legislation, with the goal of making water drinkable and fishable. It establishes standards and enforcement measures for water quality.
2) The Safe Drinking Water Act defines maximum contaminant levels to protect drinking water. It prohibits certain contaminants and requires monitoring of lead and copper levels.
3) These acts have helped control water pollution, protect habitats, and establish programs to clean up contaminated sites and prevent oil spills.
The document discusses aquifer exemptions, which allow oil and gas or mining activity in underground sources of drinking water that would otherwise be federally protected. There are almost 5,000 exempted aquifers nationwide exempting underground water sources. Aquifer exemptions essentially remove protections from drinking water sources to enable energy extraction activities like wastewater disposal and enhanced oil recovery. However, critics argue that aquifer exemptions prioritize fossil fuel production over drinking water protection and their criteria are outdated, potentially exempting aquifers that may become necessary sources of drinking water.
This document summarizes concerns with draft Watershed Management Programs (WMPs) from a non-governmental organization perspective. Key concerns include WMPs relying on non-site specific data, insufficient prioritization of pollutants, unreasonable timelines that extend past permit deadlines, and monitoring plans not able to identify responsible parties for water quality issues. The document calls for WMPs to more specifically classify pollutants, justify strategies to reduce pollution, and not overrely on future changes or adaptive management to meet permit requirements.
Shauna Fitzsimmons: Managing to the DFC, TWCA Fall Conference 2015TWCA
This document discusses how groundwater districts can regulate groundwater production to avoid limiting or curtailing production in the future. It recommends that districts develop regulatory systems based on local conditions when current or projected use exceeds the annual water budget. Districts should consider major water users, property rights, and investment expectations. The document also provides tips on structuring regulations to reduce the risk of takings liability, such as providing lead time for production cuts and including variance processes.
Chad Forcey at the Irrigation Association outlines the current state of water law across the U.S., and what irrigation contractors can do to stay up to date on their local regulatory environment.
The document provides an overview of a lecture on environmental and natural resource protection under tribal law. It discusses how tribes have authority over natural resources on their lands through inherent sovereignty, federal statutes like the Clean Water Act, and treaties. Tribes enact laws and standards to regulate areas like air and water quality. The lecture covers tribal roles as regulators, property owners, and trustees responsible for natural resources. It also gives examples of tribal environmental codes.
The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact was signed into federal law with great fanfare in 2008. However, states must do more to realize the Compact’s potential to better manage Great Lakes waters in and outside of the basin through comprehensive water conservation and efficiency programs, improved data sharing and more comprehensive permitting.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
The document summarizes recent regulatory actions, legislation, and legal cases related to water regulation. It notes that three oil production facilities in Louisiana were fined in August 2012 for violations of SPCC regulations, including failures to conduct inspections, provide documentation of training, and ensure adequate secondary containment. It also references two bills in Congress related to water regulation and summarizes three legal cases, including one upholding imprisonment and fines for Clean Water Act violations.
This document provides an overview of changing federal and state water regulations and how they affect construction projects. It discusses the Clean Water Act and defines Waters of the United States (WUS), explaining how the CWA regulates WUS at construction sites through Section 404 permitting. It also describes how Maryland regulations facilitate local ordinances and adds additional criteria beyond federal rules. The document summarizes key terms, permitting processes, and best management practices for complying with stormwater management requirements that integrate ecological and engineering standards to protect water resources.
The document summarizes the history and evolution of stormwater management regulations in the United States from the 1940s to present. It discusses the key laws passed including the Clean Water Act and its amendments. It describes the development of NPDES permitting programs for municipal separate storm sewer systems and the establishment of effluent limitation guidelines and best management practices for stormwater. It also discusses the concept of "maximum extent practicable" in regulating stormwater discharges.
Warren Formo, Joe Smentek - Water Regulations Update: Waters of the United St...John Blue
Water Regulations Update: Waters of the United States and Buffer Strips - Warren Formo, Minnesota Agricultural Water Resource Center; Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Research and Promotion Council, from the 2016 Minnesota Pork Congress, January 18 - 20, 2016, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
More presentations at http://www.swinecast.com/2016-minnesota-pork-congress
Environmental Issues in Federal Permitting for Energy ProjectsWinston & Strawn LLP
The document summarizes a presentation on emerging issues in federal permitting for energy projects. It discusses challenges with assessing the environmental impacts of transmission lines under NEPA when generation and transmission facilities have different owners. It also addresses uncertainties caused by endangered species listing decisions. Recent regulatory developments discussed include amendments to incidental take permitting and the waters of the United States rule. The presentation concludes with updates on EPA's greenhouse gas rules and new CEQ guidance on climate change reviews and programmatic NEPA analyses.
This document provides a summary of groundwater-related bills passed during the 84th Regular Session of the Texas Legislature. Key bills addressed desired future conditions appeals, aquifer storage and recovery permitting, brackish groundwater production zones, permit renewals with groundwater conservation districts, GCD board member liability, water well driller apprenticeships, and disclosure requirements for property sellers about GCDs. Other bills addressed TWDB aquifer mapping, ownership of groundwater rights, and GCD creation and boundary expansions.
Hieb, Wendy, IDNR, Hot Topics in NPDES Permitting, MECC, 2016, Overland ParkKevin Perry
This document summarizes hot topics in NPDES permitting in Iowa, including: updating water quality standards; renewing general permits 5 and 7; creating new general permits 8 and 9; implementing the Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy; addressing temperature limits and 316(b) cooling water intake requirements; and complying with new steam electric effluent guidelines. It provides details on permit inventories, rulemaking timelines, and challenges associated with implementing various permitting programs and regulatory requirements in Iowa.
This document summarizes a presentation on groundwater conservation districts and legislation in Texas. It discusses the role and history of GCDs, key court cases around groundwater ownership and takings, and recent legislation around joint planning, brackish groundwater production, and other GCD regulations. Key bills in the current legislative session aim to streamline permitting, require seller disclosures, and designate brackish groundwater production zones with limited oversight. Outstanding legal questions remain around what constitutes regulatory takings of groundwater rights.
This document provides an overview of Maryland water laws and regulations, stormwater management, and best management practices. It discusses four categories of effects from development on hydrology, geomorphology, habitat, and water quality. It describes regulatory definitions of waters, permitting criteria for impacts and regulated waters from various agencies, water quality standards, stormwater management criteria and practices, and the differences between erosion and sediment control and stormwater management.
The document summarizes key US regulations around water quality:
1) The Clean Water Act is the cornerstone of US water quality legislation, with the goal of making water drinkable and fishable. It establishes standards and enforcement measures for water quality.
2) The Safe Drinking Water Act defines maximum contaminant levels to protect drinking water. It prohibits certain contaminants and requires monitoring of lead and copper levels.
3) These acts have helped control water pollution, protect habitats, and establish programs to clean up contaminated sites and prevent oil spills.
The document discusses aquifer exemptions, which allow oil and gas or mining activity in underground sources of drinking water that would otherwise be federally protected. There are almost 5,000 exempted aquifers nationwide exempting underground water sources. Aquifer exemptions essentially remove protections from drinking water sources to enable energy extraction activities like wastewater disposal and enhanced oil recovery. However, critics argue that aquifer exemptions prioritize fossil fuel production over drinking water protection and their criteria are outdated, potentially exempting aquifers that may become necessary sources of drinking water.
This document summarizes concerns with draft Watershed Management Programs (WMPs) from a non-governmental organization perspective. Key concerns include WMPs relying on non-site specific data, insufficient prioritization of pollutants, unreasonable timelines that extend past permit deadlines, and monitoring plans not able to identify responsible parties for water quality issues. The document calls for WMPs to more specifically classify pollutants, justify strategies to reduce pollution, and not overrely on future changes or adaptive management to meet permit requirements.
Shauna Fitzsimmons: Managing to the DFC, TWCA Fall Conference 2015TWCA
This document discusses how groundwater districts can regulate groundwater production to avoid limiting or curtailing production in the future. It recommends that districts develop regulatory systems based on local conditions when current or projected use exceeds the annual water budget. Districts should consider major water users, property rights, and investment expectations. The document also provides tips on structuring regulations to reduce the risk of takings liability, such as providing lead time for production cuts and including variance processes.
Chad Forcey at the Irrigation Association outlines the current state of water law across the U.S., and what irrigation contractors can do to stay up to date on their local regulatory environment.
The document provides an overview of a lecture on environmental and natural resource protection under tribal law. It discusses how tribes have authority over natural resources on their lands through inherent sovereignty, federal statutes like the Clean Water Act, and treaties. Tribes enact laws and standards to regulate areas like air and water quality. The lecture covers tribal roles as regulators, property owners, and trustees responsible for natural resources. It also gives examples of tribal environmental codes.
The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact was signed into federal law with great fanfare in 2008. However, states must do more to realize the Compact’s potential to better manage Great Lakes waters in and outside of the basin through comprehensive water conservation and efficiency programs, improved data sharing and more comprehensive permitting.
Similar to Patchwork Blue - Survey of US RWH Laws - ARCSA Conference - Oct 2017 (20)
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Improving the viability of probiotics by encapsulation methods for developmen...Open Access Research Paper
The popularity of functional foods among scientists and common people has been increasing day by day. Awareness and modernization make the consumer think better regarding food and nutrition. Now a day’s individual knows very well about the relation between food consumption and disease prevalence. Humans have a diversity of microbes in the gut that together form the gut microflora. Probiotics are the health-promoting live microbial cells improve host health through gut and brain connection and fighting against harmful bacteria. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the two bacterial genera which are considered to be probiotic. These good bacteria are facing challenges of viability. There are so many factors such as sensitivity to heat, pH, acidity, osmotic effect, mechanical shear, chemical components, freezing and storage time as well which affects the viability of probiotics in the dairy food matrix as well as in the gut. Multiple efforts have been done in the past and ongoing in present for these beneficial microbial population stability until their destination in the gut. One of a useful technique known as microencapsulation makes the probiotic effective in the diversified conditions and maintain these microbe’s community to the optimum level for achieving targeted benefits. Dairy products are found to be an ideal vehicle for probiotic incorporation. It has been seen that the encapsulated microbial cells show higher viability than the free cells in different processing and storage conditions as well as against bile salts in the gut. They make the food functional when incorporated, without affecting the product sensory characteristics.
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
9. International Plumbing Code (IPC)
• International Code Council
• Developed International
Green Construction Code
(IgCC) as a supplement in
2012 with a section
dedicated to water efficiency
and conservation
• IgCC became part of main
code in 2015
10. Universal Plumbing Code (UPC)
• International Association of
Plumbing and Mechanical
Officials (IAPMO)
• Developed Green Plumbing
& Mechanical Code
Supplement in 2010
11. Backflow Prevention Regulations
• Based on “Degree of Hazard”
• No formal regulation at national
level
• Safe Water Drinking Water Act
• State, County, and Municipality
regulations vary greatly
• States develop rules but give them
over to municipalities to administer
• EPA published Cross-Connection
Control Manual
12. NSF/ANSI Standards
• NSF P151: Certification of Rainwater Catchment System
Components
• NSF/ANSI Standard 61 - Drinking Water System Components
Health Effects
• NSF/ANSI Standard 53-2007a - Drinking
Water Treatment Units - Health Effects
• NSF/ANSI Standard 55 - Ultraviolet
Microbiological Water Treatment Systems
• NSF/ANSI Standard 60 - Drinking Water
System Chemicals Health Effects
13. ARCSA/ASPE/ANSI 63-2013:
Rainwater Catchment Systems
• Approved on November 14, 2013
• Jointly developed by ASPE and ARCSA
• Co-sponsored by IAPMO and NSF
International
• Assist engineers, designers, plumbers,
builders/developers, local government
officials, and end users in safely
implementing a rainwater catchment
system using precipitation from
rooftops
14. ARCSA/ASPE/ANSI 78-2015:
Stormwater Harvesting System Design
• Approved on August 3, 2015
• Jointly developed by ASPE and ARCSA
• Co-sponsored by IAPMO and NSF
International
• Provides guidance on how to install
and maintain a safe alternative to
utility-provided water and to optimize
stormwater utilization to reduce
dependence on municipal potable
water systems
15. Literature Review
Rainwater Harvesting State Regulations and Technical
Resources
State Rainwater Harvesting Laws
and Legislation
– National Conference of State Legislatures
Laws, Rules & Codes webpage
– ARSCA
Regulations & Statutes webpage
– HarvestH2o.com
– SA Loper, Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory, June 2015
– Produced for U.S. Federal Energy
Management Program
20. RWH Bills Filed Since 2008
AZ
4
AR
1
CA
5
IL
4
NC
2
TX
9
UT
1
WA
2
1
1
0
0
2
0
0 0
Source: National Conference of State Legislatures
21. Types of Rainwater Harvesting Bills
• Rainwater harvesting licensure (TX)
• Prohibition of homeowner associations from
preventing the practice (IL)
• Expand definition of plumbing (IL, TX)
• Tax credit for rainwater harvesting (NC)
• Defining need for permit (AR, CA, UT, WA)
• Exemption from ad valorem taxation (TX)
22. Unpassed RWH Tax Credit Bills
• North Carolina HB 1385 (2009)
– Tax credit for the construction of cisterns on residential and
commercial properties
– Credit equal to 35% of an eligible cistern cost, including modifications
to existing plumbing systems necessary for operation of the system
• New Mexico SB 16 (2014)
– “Water harvesting income tax credit” to provide incentive for
homeowners and businesses to use harvested water
– Credit equal to 20% of the purchase and installation costs of the
system, up to $5,000. Earmark max annual aggregate of
$2,000,000/year
• Arizona HB 2330 (2017)
– Tax credit for installing a residential “water augmentation system”
– Credit equal to 25% of the cost of the system not to exceed $1,000
23. Why Regulations are Necessary?
• Regulations of RWH is interpreted through
other regulations:
– Water well and private water systems
– Stormwater management and green infrastructure
– Reclaimed water
– Cistern or tank construction standards
• Clarify authority of review
• Prevent misinformed implementation
24. Goals of RWH Regulations
• Define RWH as legal practice
• Promote the use of rainwater while safeguarding
public health
• Make permitting predictive
• Avoid restrictive policies
• Define the requirements of RWH in relation to
existing code
• Make it easy for the public to understand and
implement
• Standardize and streamline application processes
25. Rainwater Regulation Hurdles
• Political
– Codes and Standards
• Water Rights
– Prior appropriation issues
• Economics
– Conflicts with purpose of water utility districts
• Health Concerns
– Backflow / Cross-connection
– Mosquito breeding
26. Nice Effort, but…
• Unfunded or “forgotten” mandates to promote RWH
• Typically it goes like this…
• The Department shall develop by [DATE], guidelines
regarding the use of rainwater. The guidelines shall
describe the conditions under which rainwater may
appropriately be used and for what purposes.
• The Department shall promote the use of rainwater as
means to reduce fresh water consumption, ease
demands on public treatment works and water supply
systems, and promote conservation.
• Texas, Virginia, Oklahoma, Arizona, Nevada, Illinois
28. Nevada Laws and Regulations
Nevada Laws and Regulations
AB 138 (2017)
• Provides that the de minimus collection of precipitation
from the rooftop of a single-family dwelling for non-
potable domestic use is exempted from the
requirements of chapter 533 of NRS and thus may be
collected without a water right or permit to
appropriate water
• Larger rainwater harvesting systems would need to
apply for a permit to the Division of Water Resources
29. Utah Laws and Regulations
SB 32 (2010)
• Allows the collection and use of precipitation without
obtaining a water right
– If an underground storage container is used, then
the maximum capacity is 2,500 gallons. The system
must be registered at state engineer’s office.
– If a covered storage container is used, then the
maximum capacity is two containers, with 100
gallons being the maximum capacity of any one
container.
Utah Laws and Regulations
30. Colorado Laws and Regulations
Colorado Laws and Regulations
SB 09-080 (2009)
• Allows limited collection and use of precipitation for landowners, only if:
– Residential property uses a well for the water supply that is permitted for
domestic uses, and there is no water supply available in the area from a
municipality, and
– The rainwater is collected only from the roof, and used only for those uses
that are allowed by, and identified on, the well permit.
HB 16-1005 (2016)
• Allows the collection of precipitation from a residential rooftop if:
– Maximum of 2 rain barrels with a combined storage capacity of 110
gallons or less are used;
– Precipitation is collected from a single-family residence or a multi-family
residence with 4 or fewer units;
– The collected precipitation is used on the residential property only for
outdoor purposes
31. Arkansas Laws and Regulations
Arkansas Laws and Regulations
SB 401 (2009)
• The State Board of Health shall allow the use of a
harvested rainwater system used for a non-potable
purpose if the harvested rainwater system:
1. Is designed by a professional engineer licensed in
Arkansas;
2. Is designed with appropriate cross-connection
safeguards; and
3. Complies with the Arkansas Plumbing Code.
32. New Mexico Laws and Regulations
The NM Office of the State Engineer encourages the
harvesting, collection and use of rainwater from
residential and commercial roof surfaces for on-site
landscape irrigation and other on-site domestic uses.
The collection of water harvested in this manner should
not reduce the amount of runoff that would have
occurred from the site in its natural, pre-development
state. Harvested rainwater may not be appropriated for
any other uses.
New Mexico Laws and Regulations
33. California Laws and Regulations
California Laws and Regulations
AB 1750 (2012)
• “Rainwater Capture Act of 2012”
• Provides that use of rainwater collected from
rooftops does not require a water right permit
from the State Water Resources Control Board
• Authorizes landscape contractors to install
rainwater capture systems for outdoor uses
34. HB 749 (2009)
• Authorizes the State Building Code to permit the use
of cisterns to provide water for flushing toilets and
for outdoor irrigation in the construction or
renovation of residential or commercial buildings or
structures
• Prohibits any state, county, or local building code or
regulation from prohibiting the use of cisterns for
these uses
North Carolina Laws and Regulations
North Carolina Laws and Regulations
35. Washington Laws and Regulations
Washington Laws and Regulations
On October 12, 2009, the Department of Ecology issued an
Interpretive Policy Statement clarifying that a water right is
not required for rooftop rainwater harvesting.
If and when the department determines that rooftop or
guzzler rainwater harvesting systems are likely to negatively
affect instream values or existing water rights, local
restrictions may be set in place to govern subsequent new
systems.
However, Ecology generally does not expect the collection of
harvested rainwater to cause problems or reduce the amount
of runoff that would have occurred from the site in its natural,
pre-development state.
36. Ohio Laws and Regulations
Ohio Laws and Regulations
Ohio Revised Code §3701.344
• Defines “Private water systems” which are
regulated by the Ohio Department of Health
• "Private water system" includes any well, spring,
cistern, pond, hauled water, or recycled water
and any equipment for the collection,
transportation, filtration, disinfection, treatment,
or storage of such water extending from and
including the source of the water to the point of
discharge
37. Texas Laws and Regulations
SB 2 (2001)
• Sales tax exemption / Ad valorem tax exemption
HB 645 (2003)
• HOA can’t restrict installation
HB 2430 (2005)
• TWDB shall establish a Rainwater Harvesting Evaluation
Committee and provide report (raincat.ch/RWReport)
HB 4 / SB 3 (2007)
• Restricts the use of rainwater indoors to nonpotable
use if connected to PWS / Backflow required
Texas Laws and Regulations
38. Texas Laws and Regulations
HB 3391 (2011)
• New state buildings shall have rainwater harvesting
systems
SB 1073 / HB 3372 (2011)
• Allows rainwater to be used for potable indoor use if
connected to PWS / Must be plumber with water supply
protection specialist endorsement to install these
HB 1902 (2015)
• Defined rainwater as an “alternative onsite water”
Texas Laws and Regulations
39. Illinois Laws and Regulations
Illinois Laws and Regulations
SB 38 (2011)
• Amends the Illinois Plumbing License Law to include
rainwater harvesting in the definition of “plumbing”
• Requires the Illinois Department of Public Health to
adopt and publish a minimum code of standards for
rainwater harvesting systems by 1/1/2012
• Requires rainwater harvesting systems and rainwater
harvesting distribution systems to be (A) used only
for non-potable uses and (B) constructed in
accordance with the Illinois Plumbing Code
• Did not pass as introduced
40.
41. Overall Take-aways
The biggest obstacles do not come
from the arena of engineering, but
from the disciplines of politics, law,
regulations, and standards.
42. What’s Next for ARCSA?
• Work with state legislators to develop
consistent RWH regulations that fits their
ultimate goal, whether it is conservation or
stormwater management
• Sponsor research to show that RWH doesn’t
diminish a “prior user’s” water supply
• Promote the idea of RWH “systems” to state
governments and consumers, not just “rain
barrels”
• Develop RWH regulation database on website
43. Thank you very much!!
Want a copy of my presentation or the
regulation database, email me at:
chris@watercache.com