Towards 2015
Pastoral Structures/
Ideas/Contemplations
Structures for Pastoral Care
Vertical
Benefits Concerns/issues to think
about
• promotes mentoring
system/leadership
• identity as a group e.g.
House
• Yrs 7-12 – variation in
developmental
progress
• appropriateness of
discussions/interactions
• inefficient use of time
with many yr level
issues to address -> HR
time becomes
administration focused
Vertical – 7-9
10-12
Benefits Concerns/issues to think
about
• Closer developmental
progress/interests/activities
• Transition 9-10 could be
seen as a “right of
passage”
• Change of teacher for
student could be good
• Change of teacher
• Loss of “whole school”
culture
• Create divide amongst
staff of “Middle
Years”/Senior Years”
teacher
Horizontal
 PC teacher is also a PD/APD teacher
 Meets daily for PC duties
 1 lesson allocated to PD/APD -> teacher
develops close relationship with student
on various levels e.g. emotional, social,
intellectual, monitors engagement with
College values, expectations
 Still first point of contact for parents
Horizontal
Benefits Concerns/Issues to think
about
• Similar developmental
issues/activities
• Strong relationships
developed, similar to LG’s
• More productive use of
time in PC dealing with
matters relevant to year
level
• If teacher changes each
year, loss of long term
relationship
• Teacher moves with
students throughout years
• Size of group for best
relationships
• Do groups align with
Houses? If so, how? More
houses needed?
Horizontal
PC teachers from a range of curriculum
areas form a core teaching team for year
level
Benefits Concerns/Issues to think about
Students and teachers know
each other well, stronger
relationships from a range of
perspectives
Promotes team approach for
teachers
Limited teachers for Middle
Years maintained
Works best before introducing
electives – 7-9
Size of groupings
Do teachers remain on year
level or move with students?
Horizontal/Vertical blend
 Horizontal for Middle Years
 Vertical for Senior Years
Benefits Concerns
Clear identity created
Same teacher can
remain for strong
relationships in both
systems
Lack of continuity/whole
school approach
elitism
Time of PC
Morning
Benefits Concerns
Great start to day to gather
with “family” group, ease into
day
Teacher can identify students
with concerns and implement
strategies to help student
Not seen as important by
some -> allows lateness
Roll marked, students leave
school, teachers do not
always refer to absentee list
Middle of day
Benefits Concerns/Issues to think
about
breaks day
Acts as a time of respite for
students e.g. identified
students who use markers to
help them get through the
day
Truancy minimised
If adjacent to lunch -> long
time for PC activities,
lunches on/off campus etc
Students who have
problems or bad start to day
may not get help
immediately
Rolls need to be marked first
lesson and sent to office
Notices to students – do we
put responsibility on
students/teachers of P1?
Start and end of day
Benefits Concerns/issues to think
about
Good way to start and wrap
up day
Beneficial for clarifying issues
before going home
Routine matters easily
addressed – uniforms, diary
etc
2 short times in day not
beneficial for
activities/relationship
building
Other issues…
 Staffing PC groups – use of support teachers
 Pastoral Guardian – splitting role/how to do it?
 Houses – more needed?
 2015 – two orientation
programs/activities/camps needed

Pastoral Structures Considerations

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Structures for PastoralCare Vertical Benefits Concerns/issues to think about • promotes mentoring system/leadership • identity as a group e.g. House • Yrs 7-12 – variation in developmental progress • appropriateness of discussions/interactions • inefficient use of time with many yr level issues to address -> HR time becomes administration focused
  • 3.
    Vertical – 7-9 10-12 BenefitsConcerns/issues to think about • Closer developmental progress/interests/activities • Transition 9-10 could be seen as a “right of passage” • Change of teacher for student could be good • Change of teacher • Loss of “whole school” culture • Create divide amongst staff of “Middle Years”/Senior Years” teacher
  • 4.
    Horizontal  PC teacheris also a PD/APD teacher  Meets daily for PC duties  1 lesson allocated to PD/APD -> teacher develops close relationship with student on various levels e.g. emotional, social, intellectual, monitors engagement with College values, expectations  Still first point of contact for parents
  • 5.
    Horizontal Benefits Concerns/Issues tothink about • Similar developmental issues/activities • Strong relationships developed, similar to LG’s • More productive use of time in PC dealing with matters relevant to year level • If teacher changes each year, loss of long term relationship • Teacher moves with students throughout years • Size of group for best relationships • Do groups align with Houses? If so, how? More houses needed?
  • 6.
    Horizontal PC teachers froma range of curriculum areas form a core teaching team for year level Benefits Concerns/Issues to think about Students and teachers know each other well, stronger relationships from a range of perspectives Promotes team approach for teachers Limited teachers for Middle Years maintained Works best before introducing electives – 7-9 Size of groupings Do teachers remain on year level or move with students?
  • 7.
    Horizontal/Vertical blend  Horizontalfor Middle Years  Vertical for Senior Years Benefits Concerns Clear identity created Same teacher can remain for strong relationships in both systems Lack of continuity/whole school approach elitism
  • 8.
    Time of PC Morning BenefitsConcerns Great start to day to gather with “family” group, ease into day Teacher can identify students with concerns and implement strategies to help student Not seen as important by some -> allows lateness Roll marked, students leave school, teachers do not always refer to absentee list
  • 9.
    Middle of day BenefitsConcerns/Issues to think about breaks day Acts as a time of respite for students e.g. identified students who use markers to help them get through the day Truancy minimised If adjacent to lunch -> long time for PC activities, lunches on/off campus etc Students who have problems or bad start to day may not get help immediately Rolls need to be marked first lesson and sent to office Notices to students – do we put responsibility on students/teachers of P1?
  • 10.
    Start and endof day Benefits Concerns/issues to think about Good way to start and wrap up day Beneficial for clarifying issues before going home Routine matters easily addressed – uniforms, diary etc 2 short times in day not beneficial for activities/relationship building
  • 11.
    Other issues…  StaffingPC groups – use of support teachers  Pastoral Guardian – splitting role/how to do it?  Houses – more needed?  2015 – two orientation programs/activities/camps needed