Paradigm shift in breeding for Sugarcane to Energycane – An exclusive biofuel crop
1. Paradigm shift in breeding for
Sugarcane to Energycane – An
exclusive biofuel crop
Dr. P. Govindaraj
Principal Scientist
ICAR - Sugarcane Breeding Institute,
Coimbatore - 641007 (INDIA)
*govindsbi1912@gmail.com
3. Energy (MJ)
110 kg of sugars 1760
140 kg of stalk fiber (bagasse, dry basis) 2 600
140 kg of leaves fiber (trash, dry basis) 2 600
Total 6960
Cogeneration potential/ha 520 GJ
(Utilising stalk fibre and trash alone)
Energy from sugarcane
(For One tonne of clean cane stalks)
9. Performance of progenies for fibre %
cane
among the interspecific crosses
Crosses Min Max Average
SO x S. Spon 16.35 24.38 19.65
SO x SB 13.95 15.85 14.90
SO x SR 13.90 18.30 15.99
SO X SH 12.62 18.18 15.18
SH 13.40 16.60 14.60
11. Cane traits for selection:
Medium thick canes
High tillering
Improved fibre content
Early fast growth
Non/shy flowering
Tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses
Breeding for energy canes
12. • For energy and Alcohol production
• >20% fibre and 15% brix
• Commercial hybrids x S. spontaneum
Type I energy canes or
Dual purpose canes
Clone Origin
Total
DMB t/ha
Fibre%
cane
Juice
Brix %
SBIEC 11002 Co 1148 x SES 404 85.10 22.58 15.92
SBIEC 11003 Co 8371 x SH 216 80.04 23.94 15.04
IA 1167 Cocane x S. spon 74.25 22.56 16.88
SBIEC 11005 Co 8371 x SES 574 72.50 25.55 16.60
IA 3135 Cocane x S. spon 60.80 23.48 17.51
SBIEC 11008 Co 8371 x SES 410 55.55 23.99 16.52
13. Clone SBIEC 11002
Parentage Co 1148 x
SES 404
Total dry matter
production t/ha
85.10
Fibre% cane 22.58
Juice Brix % 15.92
Type I or Dual purpose Energy canes
14. Parentage Co 8371 x
SH 216
Total dry
matter
production t/ha
80.04
Fibre% cane 23.94
Juice Brix % 15.04
SBIEC 11003
15. Parentage Co 8371 x
SES 574
Total dry matter
production t/ha
72.50
Fibre% cane 25.55
Juice Brix % 16.60
SBIEC 11005
16. Development of Type II energy canes
• Total energy canes ( >25% fibre)
– Selected hybrids by intercrossing or
selfing Erianthus.
– S. spontaneum introgressed clones
Clones are selected for total
dry matter production and
fiber content
17. Type II energy canes
Clone
Total dry
matter
prodn/ha
Fibre
%
cane
Juice
Brix
%
SBIEC 11001 101.23 26.38 9.75
SBIEC 11004 75.94 30.21 7.80
SBIEC 11006 69.50 25.77 11.00
SBIEC 11007 56.13 25.91 8.09
18. Clone SBIEC 11001
Parentage
IK 76-92 X 98
N1 1405
Total dry matter
production t/ha
101.23
Fibre% cane 26.38
Juice Brix % 9.75
SBIEC
11001
Total energy canes (Type II canes)
19. Total energy canes (Type II canes)
Parentage
IK 76-92 X 98
N1 1405
Total dry matter
production t/ha
75.94
Fibre% cane 30.21
Juice Brix % 7.86
SBIEC
11004
20. Clone SBIEC 11006
Parentage
IK 76-92 X 98
N1 1405
Total dry matter
production t/ha
69.50
Fibre% cane 25.77
Juice Brix % 11.00
SBIEC
11006
Total energy canes (Type II canes)
27. Clone No. Parentage
Fibre
%
Brix
%
HBM
(t/ha)
SBIEC 13001 IGH 037801 X CoJ 03193 31.86 17.00 149.80
SBIEC 13002 IGH 013504 x CoJ 03193 26.24 16.50 169.10
SBIEC 13003 ISH 100 x IA 3107 24.64 20.78 137.55
SBIEC 13004 Co86002 x SES 132B 24.49 19.20 154.83
SBIEC 13005 Co 8471 x IND 84 - 415 24.48 18.40 200.55
SBIEC 13006 Co 86032 x (Co 1148xIND 84-415) 23.69 17.45 156.24
SBIEC 13007 Co 8471 x IND 84 - 415 23.07 15.90 182.13
SBIEC 13008 IK76-92 x 98 N1 1405 22.61 18.80 169.19
SBIEC 13009 IGH 013504 x Co 0218 22.00 18.90 174.72
SBIEC 13010 MS 6847 x IND 87 -145 21.32 17.20 205.59
Performance of new set of energy canes
30. Energy Garden is established with 25 energy
canes (Type I and Type II canes)
Ten energy canes are tested at M/s. Nava Bharat
Ventures Limited at Dharmavaram (AP) & deccan
Sugars mills
Twenty five clones are being evaluated at M/s.
Trishe energy Limited, T. Kallupatti, (Tamil Nadu)
Energy GardenEnergy Garden
at Sugarcane Breeding Instituteat Sugarcane Breeding Institute
31. Future focus areas
Identification of suitable lands
Appropriate package of practices
Economy of energy cane cultivation
Logistic in harvesting, transport,
processing
Identification of suitable lands
Appropriate package of practices
Economy of energy cane cultivation
Logistic in harvesting, transport,
processing
32. • Economic
– Improved profitability of sugar industry
– Cogeneration is local: reduced network costs and
transmission losses
– Improved utilisation of marginal lands (drought,
water logging, salinity etc.,)
• Social
– Increased farming and rural employment
– Increased and quality electricity supply
• Environmental
– Reduced GHG emissions (compared to coal
burning)
– Benefits from CDM
33. • Acute shortage and high landing cost of feedstocks are
the major problems for biofuel industries.
• Erianthus arundinaceus and Saccharum spontaneum
have contributed significantly to the energycane
development
• 16 MW cogeneration unit established in the present
sugar industries requires 600 ha of energy plantations to
extend the duration for 100 days.
• With lignocellulosic conversion of bagasse into ethanol,
year round production of alcohol is feasible with captive
energy cane plantations.
• The energy canes developed are capable of growing in
marginal and abiotic stress condition where any food
crop cannot be cultivated economically.
Summary