This document discusses academic publication and provides guidance on publishing research. It addresses what academic publication entails, why and when researchers should publish, and where to publish. It outlines the structure of research papers and provides tips for getting ideas to write articles. It discusses aspects like planning, drafting, formatting, and the peer review process. It recommends publishing in different venues over the course of a researcher's career, from conferences to journals. Finally, it discusses academic social networking sites that can help researchers collaborate and disseminate their work.
How to publish your paper in international journalsdrboon
scientific and engineering e-journal publication TuEngr.com group. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sc iences & Technologies publishes wide spectrum research and technical articles as well as reviews, experiments, experiences, modelings, simulations, designs, and innovations from engineering, sciences, life sciences, and related disciplines as well as interdisciplinary/cross-disciplinary/multidisciplinary subjects. Original work is required. Article submitted must not be under consideration of other publisher for publications.
The document discusses paraphrasing and provides guidance on how to properly paraphrase sources. It states that a paraphrase should restate the key ideas from another source in a new form without plagiarizing. Students are advised to minimize directly copied material when taking notes and paraphrase sources, retaining around 10% or less of the original wording in their final papers. The document then offers steps for effective paraphrasing, which include understanding the original passage, taking notes on key ideas, writing the paraphrase without looking at the original, and checking that all essential information was retained accurately.
This document provides advice for early career researchers on publishing their first papers. It discusses managing expectations and pressures to publish, strategies for writing papers, preparing manuscripts for submission, common problems reviewers encounter, and tips for seeking feedback and revising papers in response to reviews. Key recommendations include writing with the target journal in mind, structuring papers like an hourglass, carefully writing the title and abstract, addressing all reviewer comments, and not being discouraged by initial rejections. Maintaining an active academic profile online can also help others find your work. Overall, clear communication is emphasized as important for facilitating the publication process.
How to Publish an Ethical Paper BJUI Author Workshop July 2009 Part Four Roge...BJU International
Presented by Roger Kirby at the BJUI Author Workshop on 23rd June 2009.This presentation details the importance of ensuring that all papers submitted to BJUI are ethical, reasonable, avoid plagiarisms and conflicts of interest. This is a good presentation that is relevant to all who are writing or going to write a paper.
The document outlines an upcoming webinar on education for sustainability using the Next Generation Science Standards. The webinar will feature presenters discussing integrating sustainability into STEM teacher preparation programs and will include discussions on incorporating sustainability concepts across curriculums and into clinical practice. Upcoming webinars and events are also advertised that are focused on the implementation of the Next Generation Science Standards.
The document provides guidance on becoming a researcher, including pursuing a PhD, finding research topics, doing good research, writing and publishing papers, and applying for academic positions in North America. It emphasizes thinking critically and creatively when exploring research ideas, focusing on a clear plan for a PhD thesis, and publishing papers regularly at top conferences and journals.
Research proposal and assessment of outputs jan 2021. prof.s.p.singhSaurashtra University
This is about the preparation of research proposals for PhD research and research projects. Further, it also includes the matrix and Indexes to evaluate research outputs.
This document discusses academic publication and provides guidance on publishing research. It addresses what academic publication entails, why and when researchers should publish, and where to publish. It outlines the structure of research papers and provides tips for getting ideas to write articles. It discusses aspects like planning, drafting, formatting, and the peer review process. It recommends publishing in different venues over the course of a researcher's career, from conferences to journals. Finally, it discusses academic social networking sites that can help researchers collaborate and disseminate their work.
How to publish your paper in international journalsdrboon
scientific and engineering e-journal publication TuEngr.com group. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sc iences & Technologies publishes wide spectrum research and technical articles as well as reviews, experiments, experiences, modelings, simulations, designs, and innovations from engineering, sciences, life sciences, and related disciplines as well as interdisciplinary/cross-disciplinary/multidisciplinary subjects. Original work is required. Article submitted must not be under consideration of other publisher for publications.
The document discusses paraphrasing and provides guidance on how to properly paraphrase sources. It states that a paraphrase should restate the key ideas from another source in a new form without plagiarizing. Students are advised to minimize directly copied material when taking notes and paraphrase sources, retaining around 10% or less of the original wording in their final papers. The document then offers steps for effective paraphrasing, which include understanding the original passage, taking notes on key ideas, writing the paraphrase without looking at the original, and checking that all essential information was retained accurately.
This document provides advice for early career researchers on publishing their first papers. It discusses managing expectations and pressures to publish, strategies for writing papers, preparing manuscripts for submission, common problems reviewers encounter, and tips for seeking feedback and revising papers in response to reviews. Key recommendations include writing with the target journal in mind, structuring papers like an hourglass, carefully writing the title and abstract, addressing all reviewer comments, and not being discouraged by initial rejections. Maintaining an active academic profile online can also help others find your work. Overall, clear communication is emphasized as important for facilitating the publication process.
How to Publish an Ethical Paper BJUI Author Workshop July 2009 Part Four Roge...BJU International
Presented by Roger Kirby at the BJUI Author Workshop on 23rd June 2009.This presentation details the importance of ensuring that all papers submitted to BJUI are ethical, reasonable, avoid plagiarisms and conflicts of interest. This is a good presentation that is relevant to all who are writing or going to write a paper.
The document outlines an upcoming webinar on education for sustainability using the Next Generation Science Standards. The webinar will feature presenters discussing integrating sustainability into STEM teacher preparation programs and will include discussions on incorporating sustainability concepts across curriculums and into clinical practice. Upcoming webinars and events are also advertised that are focused on the implementation of the Next Generation Science Standards.
The document provides guidance on becoming a researcher, including pursuing a PhD, finding research topics, doing good research, writing and publishing papers, and applying for academic positions in North America. It emphasizes thinking critically and creatively when exploring research ideas, focusing on a clear plan for a PhD thesis, and publishing papers regularly at top conferences and journals.
Research proposal and assessment of outputs jan 2021. prof.s.p.singhSaurashtra University
This is about the preparation of research proposals for PhD research and research projects. Further, it also includes the matrix and Indexes to evaluate research outputs.
Vnsgu.pre ph d.course work.27aug2021.a talk on 'quality evaluation and ethic...Saurashtra University
V N South Gujarat University: A Presentation in PhD Course WorkQuality Evaluation and Ethics in Research and PublicationsCitation index, Journal Impact Factors , H – Index and Impact Factor
This document provides guidelines for responsible research publication. It discusses ethical considerations around several key topics:
1. Honest and accurate reporting of methods and results, including complete reporting of all findings.
2. Transparent disclosure of all sources of funding, conflicts of interest, and contributions from those not listed as authors.
3. Adherence to standards for authorship, attribution of ideas to others through citations, and avoidance of plagiarism or duplicate publication.
4. Peer review as an important part of the scientific process, with responsibilities for editors, reviewers and authors to maintain objectivity and confidentiality.
The document emphasizes researchers' responsibility to conduct work ethically and report it clearly so that findings
The document provides instructions for a school assignment evaluating claims made in media articles about climate change. Students are asked to find one article agreeing that climate change is occurring and one disagreeing, then analyze two claims from each. They must also discuss the media debate around climate change, stakeholders on each side, and how the public learns about the issue. The report should introduce the articles, evaluate the four claims in relation to climate science evidence, analyze the media debate, include a bibliography, and attach copies of the articles. The assignment will be graded based on choice of articles, summaries, claim evaluation, analysis of the debate, bibliography, writing quality, and presentation.
Journal of Global Infectious Diseases (JGID) a peer-reviewed Semiannual international journal is being published under the auspices of the International Infectiologists Network .
The journal’s full text is online at www.jgid.org With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in JGID.
\Manuscripts must be prepared in accordance with "Uniform requirements for Manuscripts submitted to Biomedical Journals" developed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (October 2006). The uniform requirements and specific requirement of JGID are summarized below. Before sending a manuscript contributors are requested to check for the latest instructions available. Instructions are also available from the website of the journal (http://www.jgid.org) and from the manuscript submission site (http://www.journalonweb.com/JGID).
This document discusses duplicate publication, which occurs when a published work is published more than once without proper acknowledgment or justification. This wastes resources and delays scientific progress. It can affect researchers, institutions, journals, and the scientific community. Examples include presenting the same findings in multiple publications or submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously. Guidelines state authors should not duplicate content and should acknowledge prior publications. If duplication cannot be avoided, authors must obtain permission and acknowledge the primary source. The document also provides two case studies as examples.
NYU Journalism Handbook for Students Ethics, Law and Good PracticeAlexandra Holt
This document summarizes the NYU Journalism Handbook for Students. It covers ethics, law, and good practice for journalism students at NYU. The handbook was created by Prof. Adam L. Penenberg and the Department of Journalism to address issues students may face. It discusses maintaining integrity in research and reporting, interacting with human sources on the record and off the record, legal issues like libel, and obtaining permission for use of copyrighted materials in reports. The goal is to provide guidance to help students report truthfully and avoid ethical or legal problems.
1) The document provides instructions for a school assignment evaluating claims made in media articles about climate change. Students are asked to find one article agreeing and one disagreeing with climate change and analyze a scientific claim from each.
2) They must also discuss the media debate around climate change - why there is controversy, who the stakeholders are on each side, and how the public learns about the issue.
3) The report should include an introduction to the articles, evaluation of the claims referring to climate science, analysis of the media debate, bibliography, and copies of the articles. The assignment will be graded based on choice of articles, summaries, analyses, references, and presentation.
Ethical Guidelines for Academic Publishing.pptxOsama Alam
This document outlines ethical guidelines for academic publishing. It discusses the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers. Editors must ensure impartiality, confidentiality, and a fair review process. Authors are responsible for original and accurate work, and providing attribution to others. Reviewers should objectively evaluate manuscripts based on academic merit, maintain confidentiality, and disclose conflicts of interest. The document provides detailed guidelines for each role to ensure integrity in the publication process.
97% of climate scientists agree fact or fiction_issue 1_160925Gordon Hirst
The document discusses the claim that 97% of climate scientists agree that climate change poses risks from human activities. It notes that this figure comes from a 2013 scientific study but has since taken on an almost mythical status in public debates. The author aims to provide a clear, level-headed examination of where the 97% figure came from, how accurate it is, and why it has become so divisive. The document outlines the scientific process and how science is perceived differently by experts and the public through media coverage.
The document discusses publication ethics, including defining authorship, avoiding plagiarism and fabrication, managing conflicts of interest, and addressing misconduct. It introduces guidelines from organizations like COPE and WAME that provide best practices for publication ethics. Adhering to ethical standards is important to ensure high-quality scientific research and public trust in findings. Journals have processes to identify and handle cases of unethical behavior.
READING ON RELATED STUDIES IN INQUIRES INVESTIATION AND IMMERSIONLeaCamillePacle
The document provides guidance on conducting a review of related literature for a research paper. It defines what a literature review is, discusses primary and secondary sources, and how to identify reliable sources. It also covers how to cite sources in-text and in a reference list using APA, MLA, and CMS styles. Additional topics include synthesizing information from sources, writing a coherent literature review with an introduction, body, and conclusion, using ethical standards when citing sources, and scientific misconduct to avoid like fabrication of data.
While plagiarism and copyright infringement both involve using someone else's work without permission, they differ in important ways:
- Plagiarism is an ethical issue concerning failing to properly attribute sources, while copyright infringement is a legal issue regarding using copyrighted work without permission.
- A student's use of a few sentences from a book in a school newspaper article may be plagiarism but not infringement due to the small amount used and educational context.
- Copying an entire book for articles without attribution would be infringement even with citation due to unauthorized copying of the entire work.
- Passing off a copied popular book as one's own work constitutes both plagiarism and copyright infringement.
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibilityEileen Shepherd
Traditional bibliometric methods of evaluating academic research, such as journal impact factors and article citations, have been supplemented in the past 5-10 years by the development of altmetrics (alternative metrics or article level metrics). Altmetrics measures impact of research, data and publications, such as references in data and knowledge bases, article views, downloads and mentions in social media and news media. This presentation gives a brief background to altmetrics and demonstrates how Rhodes University librarians are using social media to raise the visibility of the research output of their institution. (Rhodes University is in Grahamstown, South Africa)
The document discusses various topics related to academic publishing including open access journals, predatory journals, research misconduct, plagiarism case studies, indexing, authorship, impact factor, and publishing policies. It provides definitions and examples for many of these topics. For example, it defines predatory journals as publications that exploit authors for financial gain through deceptive practices, and provides tools to identify predatory journals. It also summarizes two plagiarism case studies involving a German politician and an Indian university vice-chancellor.
Scientific misconduct includes plagiarism, duplicate publication, failure to obtain IRB approval or maintain research records, and fabrication or distortion of data. Plagiarism involves presenting others' work as one's own, while paraphrasing must fully change the original language and structure. All human subject research must undergo IRB review and approval before data collection. Researchers must maintain accurate records for 5 years and obtain participants' informed consent to share any private information.
The document discusses the negative impacts of over-reliance on bibliometrics and journal impact factors in assessing scientific merit and making hiring decisions. It argues that counting publications and citations fails to evaluate a scientist's creative contributions and long-term potential. Focusing solely on publishing in high-impact journals distorts the nature of scientific work, forcing papers into narrow topics and brevity at the cost of depth and usability. Individual scientists and institutions must resist overemphasizing bibliometrics and make hiring decisions based on true scientific merit rather than superficial metrics.
Prof. sp singh.ph d.course work.2020-21.citation index, journal impact factor...Saurashtra University
Citation index, Journal Impact Factors , H – Index and Impact Factor
-------
RESEARCH, PUBLICATIONS AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT
WIDE VARIATION IN THE ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY JUDGMENT
DIFFRENTIAL LEVEL OF RESEARCH OUTPUT- Reflected by number/frequency/quality of the publication
LACK OF INTEREST
DIFFERNCES IN OVER ALL OBJECTIVES
TYPES OF PUBLICATIONS
TYPES AND QUALITY OF THE JOURNALS
Ten principles underlying good publication practices.Zeena Nackerdien
Dotting the i's and crossing the t's in bringing a drug/device to market, means understanding the plethora of regulations involved in designing, executing, and communicating the results from a clinical trial. Experts in publication planning have collaborated in order to clarify the process for all stakeholders.
DISCLAIMER: Please note that this infographic is best viewed by changing the PowerPoint slide size to 11" x 6". Otherwise, the images will appear to overlap.
Recomendações da OMS sobre cuidados maternos e neonatais para uma experiência pós-natal positiva.
Em consonância com os ODS – Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável e a Estratégia Global para a Saúde das Mulheres, Crianças e Adolescentes, e aplicando uma abordagem baseada nos direitos humanos, os esforços de cuidados pós-natais devem expandir-se para além da cobertura e da simples sobrevivência, de modo a incluir cuidados de qualidade.
Estas diretrizes visam melhorar a qualidade dos cuidados pós-natais essenciais e de rotina prestados às mulheres e aos recém-nascidos, com o objetivo final de melhorar a saúde e o bem-estar materno e neonatal.
Uma “experiência pós-natal positiva” é um resultado importante para todas as mulheres que dão à luz e para os seus recém-nascidos, estabelecendo as bases para a melhoria da saúde e do bem-estar a curto e longo prazo. Uma experiência pós-natal positiva é definida como aquela em que as mulheres, pessoas que gestam, os recém-nascidos, os casais, os pais, os cuidadores e as famílias recebem informação consistente, garantia e apoio de profissionais de saúde motivados; e onde um sistema de saúde flexível e com recursos reconheça as necessidades das mulheres e dos bebês e respeite o seu contexto cultural.
Estas diretrizes consolidadas apresentam algumas recomendações novas e já bem fundamentadas sobre cuidados pós-natais de rotina para mulheres e neonatos que recebem cuidados no pós-parto em unidades de saúde ou na comunidade, independentemente dos recursos disponíveis.
É fornecido um conjunto abrangente de recomendações para cuidados durante o período puerperal, com ênfase nos cuidados essenciais que todas as mulheres e recém-nascidos devem receber, e com a devida atenção à qualidade dos cuidados; isto é, a entrega e a experiência do cuidado recebido. Estas diretrizes atualizam e ampliam as recomendações da OMS de 2014 sobre cuidados pós-natais da mãe e do recém-nascido e complementam as atuais diretrizes da OMS sobre a gestão de complicações pós-natais.
O estabelecimento da amamentação e o manejo das principais intercorrências é contemplada.
Recomendamos muito.
Vamos discutir essas recomendações no nosso curso de pós-graduação em Aleitamento no Instituto Ciclos.
Esta publicação só está disponível em inglês até o momento.
Prof. Marcus Renato de Carvalho
www.agostodourado.com
Adhd Medication Shortage Uk - trinexpharmacy.comreignlana06
The UK is currently facing a Adhd Medication Shortage Uk, which has left many patients and their families grappling with uncertainty and frustration. ADHD, or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, is a chronic condition that requires consistent medication to manage effectively. This shortage has highlighted the critical role these medications play in the daily lives of those affected by ADHD. Contact : +1 (747) 209 – 3649 E-mail : sales@trinexpharmacy.com
More Related Content
Similar to Paper publishing: Ethical Obligations and Rights
Vnsgu.pre ph d.course work.27aug2021.a talk on 'quality evaluation and ethic...Saurashtra University
V N South Gujarat University: A Presentation in PhD Course WorkQuality Evaluation and Ethics in Research and PublicationsCitation index, Journal Impact Factors , H – Index and Impact Factor
This document provides guidelines for responsible research publication. It discusses ethical considerations around several key topics:
1. Honest and accurate reporting of methods and results, including complete reporting of all findings.
2. Transparent disclosure of all sources of funding, conflicts of interest, and contributions from those not listed as authors.
3. Adherence to standards for authorship, attribution of ideas to others through citations, and avoidance of plagiarism or duplicate publication.
4. Peer review as an important part of the scientific process, with responsibilities for editors, reviewers and authors to maintain objectivity and confidentiality.
The document emphasizes researchers' responsibility to conduct work ethically and report it clearly so that findings
The document provides instructions for a school assignment evaluating claims made in media articles about climate change. Students are asked to find one article agreeing that climate change is occurring and one disagreeing, then analyze two claims from each. They must also discuss the media debate around climate change, stakeholders on each side, and how the public learns about the issue. The report should introduce the articles, evaluate the four claims in relation to climate science evidence, analyze the media debate, include a bibliography, and attach copies of the articles. The assignment will be graded based on choice of articles, summaries, claim evaluation, analysis of the debate, bibliography, writing quality, and presentation.
Journal of Global Infectious Diseases (JGID) a peer-reviewed Semiannual international journal is being published under the auspices of the International Infectiologists Network .
The journal’s full text is online at www.jgid.org With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in JGID.
\Manuscripts must be prepared in accordance with "Uniform requirements for Manuscripts submitted to Biomedical Journals" developed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (October 2006). The uniform requirements and specific requirement of JGID are summarized below. Before sending a manuscript contributors are requested to check for the latest instructions available. Instructions are also available from the website of the journal (http://www.jgid.org) and from the manuscript submission site (http://www.journalonweb.com/JGID).
This document discusses duplicate publication, which occurs when a published work is published more than once without proper acknowledgment or justification. This wastes resources and delays scientific progress. It can affect researchers, institutions, journals, and the scientific community. Examples include presenting the same findings in multiple publications or submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously. Guidelines state authors should not duplicate content and should acknowledge prior publications. If duplication cannot be avoided, authors must obtain permission and acknowledge the primary source. The document also provides two case studies as examples.
NYU Journalism Handbook for Students Ethics, Law and Good PracticeAlexandra Holt
This document summarizes the NYU Journalism Handbook for Students. It covers ethics, law, and good practice for journalism students at NYU. The handbook was created by Prof. Adam L. Penenberg and the Department of Journalism to address issues students may face. It discusses maintaining integrity in research and reporting, interacting with human sources on the record and off the record, legal issues like libel, and obtaining permission for use of copyrighted materials in reports. The goal is to provide guidance to help students report truthfully and avoid ethical or legal problems.
1) The document provides instructions for a school assignment evaluating claims made in media articles about climate change. Students are asked to find one article agreeing and one disagreeing with climate change and analyze a scientific claim from each.
2) They must also discuss the media debate around climate change - why there is controversy, who the stakeholders are on each side, and how the public learns about the issue.
3) The report should include an introduction to the articles, evaluation of the claims referring to climate science, analysis of the media debate, bibliography, and copies of the articles. The assignment will be graded based on choice of articles, summaries, analyses, references, and presentation.
Ethical Guidelines for Academic Publishing.pptxOsama Alam
This document outlines ethical guidelines for academic publishing. It discusses the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers. Editors must ensure impartiality, confidentiality, and a fair review process. Authors are responsible for original and accurate work, and providing attribution to others. Reviewers should objectively evaluate manuscripts based on academic merit, maintain confidentiality, and disclose conflicts of interest. The document provides detailed guidelines for each role to ensure integrity in the publication process.
97% of climate scientists agree fact or fiction_issue 1_160925Gordon Hirst
The document discusses the claim that 97% of climate scientists agree that climate change poses risks from human activities. It notes that this figure comes from a 2013 scientific study but has since taken on an almost mythical status in public debates. The author aims to provide a clear, level-headed examination of where the 97% figure came from, how accurate it is, and why it has become so divisive. The document outlines the scientific process and how science is perceived differently by experts and the public through media coverage.
The document discusses publication ethics, including defining authorship, avoiding plagiarism and fabrication, managing conflicts of interest, and addressing misconduct. It introduces guidelines from organizations like COPE and WAME that provide best practices for publication ethics. Adhering to ethical standards is important to ensure high-quality scientific research and public trust in findings. Journals have processes to identify and handle cases of unethical behavior.
READING ON RELATED STUDIES IN INQUIRES INVESTIATION AND IMMERSIONLeaCamillePacle
The document provides guidance on conducting a review of related literature for a research paper. It defines what a literature review is, discusses primary and secondary sources, and how to identify reliable sources. It also covers how to cite sources in-text and in a reference list using APA, MLA, and CMS styles. Additional topics include synthesizing information from sources, writing a coherent literature review with an introduction, body, and conclusion, using ethical standards when citing sources, and scientific misconduct to avoid like fabrication of data.
While plagiarism and copyright infringement both involve using someone else's work without permission, they differ in important ways:
- Plagiarism is an ethical issue concerning failing to properly attribute sources, while copyright infringement is a legal issue regarding using copyrighted work without permission.
- A student's use of a few sentences from a book in a school newspaper article may be plagiarism but not infringement due to the small amount used and educational context.
- Copying an entire book for articles without attribution would be infringement even with citation due to unauthorized copying of the entire work.
- Passing off a copied popular book as one's own work constitutes both plagiarism and copyright infringement.
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibilityEileen Shepherd
Traditional bibliometric methods of evaluating academic research, such as journal impact factors and article citations, have been supplemented in the past 5-10 years by the development of altmetrics (alternative metrics or article level metrics). Altmetrics measures impact of research, data and publications, such as references in data and knowledge bases, article views, downloads and mentions in social media and news media. This presentation gives a brief background to altmetrics and demonstrates how Rhodes University librarians are using social media to raise the visibility of the research output of their institution. (Rhodes University is in Grahamstown, South Africa)
The document discusses various topics related to academic publishing including open access journals, predatory journals, research misconduct, plagiarism case studies, indexing, authorship, impact factor, and publishing policies. It provides definitions and examples for many of these topics. For example, it defines predatory journals as publications that exploit authors for financial gain through deceptive practices, and provides tools to identify predatory journals. It also summarizes two plagiarism case studies involving a German politician and an Indian university vice-chancellor.
Scientific misconduct includes plagiarism, duplicate publication, failure to obtain IRB approval or maintain research records, and fabrication or distortion of data. Plagiarism involves presenting others' work as one's own, while paraphrasing must fully change the original language and structure. All human subject research must undergo IRB review and approval before data collection. Researchers must maintain accurate records for 5 years and obtain participants' informed consent to share any private information.
The document discusses the negative impacts of over-reliance on bibliometrics and journal impact factors in assessing scientific merit and making hiring decisions. It argues that counting publications and citations fails to evaluate a scientist's creative contributions and long-term potential. Focusing solely on publishing in high-impact journals distorts the nature of scientific work, forcing papers into narrow topics and brevity at the cost of depth and usability. Individual scientists and institutions must resist overemphasizing bibliometrics and make hiring decisions based on true scientific merit rather than superficial metrics.
Prof. sp singh.ph d.course work.2020-21.citation index, journal impact factor...Saurashtra University
Citation index, Journal Impact Factors , H – Index and Impact Factor
-------
RESEARCH, PUBLICATIONS AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT
WIDE VARIATION IN THE ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY JUDGMENT
DIFFRENTIAL LEVEL OF RESEARCH OUTPUT- Reflected by number/frequency/quality of the publication
LACK OF INTEREST
DIFFERNCES IN OVER ALL OBJECTIVES
TYPES OF PUBLICATIONS
TYPES AND QUALITY OF THE JOURNALS
Ten principles underlying good publication practices.Zeena Nackerdien
Dotting the i's and crossing the t's in bringing a drug/device to market, means understanding the plethora of regulations involved in designing, executing, and communicating the results from a clinical trial. Experts in publication planning have collaborated in order to clarify the process for all stakeholders.
DISCLAIMER: Please note that this infographic is best viewed by changing the PowerPoint slide size to 11" x 6". Otherwise, the images will appear to overlap.
Similar to Paper publishing: Ethical Obligations and Rights (20)
Recomendações da OMS sobre cuidados maternos e neonatais para uma experiência pós-natal positiva.
Em consonância com os ODS – Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável e a Estratégia Global para a Saúde das Mulheres, Crianças e Adolescentes, e aplicando uma abordagem baseada nos direitos humanos, os esforços de cuidados pós-natais devem expandir-se para além da cobertura e da simples sobrevivência, de modo a incluir cuidados de qualidade.
Estas diretrizes visam melhorar a qualidade dos cuidados pós-natais essenciais e de rotina prestados às mulheres e aos recém-nascidos, com o objetivo final de melhorar a saúde e o bem-estar materno e neonatal.
Uma “experiência pós-natal positiva” é um resultado importante para todas as mulheres que dão à luz e para os seus recém-nascidos, estabelecendo as bases para a melhoria da saúde e do bem-estar a curto e longo prazo. Uma experiência pós-natal positiva é definida como aquela em que as mulheres, pessoas que gestam, os recém-nascidos, os casais, os pais, os cuidadores e as famílias recebem informação consistente, garantia e apoio de profissionais de saúde motivados; e onde um sistema de saúde flexível e com recursos reconheça as necessidades das mulheres e dos bebês e respeite o seu contexto cultural.
Estas diretrizes consolidadas apresentam algumas recomendações novas e já bem fundamentadas sobre cuidados pós-natais de rotina para mulheres e neonatos que recebem cuidados no pós-parto em unidades de saúde ou na comunidade, independentemente dos recursos disponíveis.
É fornecido um conjunto abrangente de recomendações para cuidados durante o período puerperal, com ênfase nos cuidados essenciais que todas as mulheres e recém-nascidos devem receber, e com a devida atenção à qualidade dos cuidados; isto é, a entrega e a experiência do cuidado recebido. Estas diretrizes atualizam e ampliam as recomendações da OMS de 2014 sobre cuidados pós-natais da mãe e do recém-nascido e complementam as atuais diretrizes da OMS sobre a gestão de complicações pós-natais.
O estabelecimento da amamentação e o manejo das principais intercorrências é contemplada.
Recomendamos muito.
Vamos discutir essas recomendações no nosso curso de pós-graduação em Aleitamento no Instituto Ciclos.
Esta publicação só está disponível em inglês até o momento.
Prof. Marcus Renato de Carvalho
www.agostodourado.com
Adhd Medication Shortage Uk - trinexpharmacy.comreignlana06
The UK is currently facing a Adhd Medication Shortage Uk, which has left many patients and their families grappling with uncertainty and frustration. ADHD, or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, is a chronic condition that requires consistent medication to manage effectively. This shortage has highlighted the critical role these medications play in the daily lives of those affected by ADHD. Contact : +1 (747) 209 – 3649 E-mail : sales@trinexpharmacy.com
Basavarajeeyam is an important text for ayurvedic physician belonging to andhra pradehs. It is a popular compendium in various parts of our country as well as in andhra pradesh. The content of the text was presented in sanskrit and telugu language (Bilingual). One of the most famous book in ayurvedic pharmaceutics and therapeutics. This book contains 25 chapters called as prakaranas. Many rasaoushadis were explained, pioneer of dhatu druti, nadi pareeksha, mutra pareeksha etc. Belongs to the period of 15-16 century. New diseases like upadamsha, phiranga rogas are explained.
Muktapishti is a traditional Ayurvedic preparation made from Shoditha Mukta (Purified Pearl), is believed to help regulate thyroid function and reduce symptoms of hyperthyroidism due to its cooling and balancing properties. Clinical evidence on its efficacy remains limited, necessitating further research to validate its therapeutic benefits.
Histololgy of Female Reproductive System.pptxAyeshaZaid1
Dive into an in-depth exploration of the histological structure of female reproductive system with this comprehensive lecture. Presented by Dr. Ayesha Irfan, Assistant Professor of Anatomy, this presentation covers the Gross anatomy and functional histology of the female reproductive organs. Ideal for students, educators, and anyone interested in medical science, this lecture provides clear explanations, detailed diagrams, and valuable insights into female reproductive system. Enhance your knowledge and understanding of this essential aspect of human biology.
Rasamanikya is a excellent preparation in the field of Rasashastra, it is used in various Kushtha Roga, Shwasa, Vicharchika, Bhagandara, Vatarakta, and Phiranga Roga. In this article Preparation& Comparative analytical profile for both Formulationon i.e Rasamanikya prepared by Kushmanda swarasa & Churnodhaka Shodita Haratala. The study aims to provide insights into the comparative efficacy and analytical aspects of these formulations for enhanced therapeutic outcomes.
Local Advanced Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex Sys...Oleg Kshivets
Overall life span (LS) was 1671.7±1721.6 days and cumulative 5YS reached 62.4%, 10 years – 50.4%, 20 years – 44.6%. 94 LCP lived more than 5 years without cancer (LS=2958.6±1723.6 days), 22 – more than 10 years (LS=5571±1841.8 days). 67 LCP died because of LC (LS=471.9±344 days). AT significantly improved 5YS (68% vs. 53.7%) (P=0.028 by log-rank test). Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: N0-N12, T3-4, blood cell circuit, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells-CC and blood cells subpopulations), LC cell dynamics, recalcification time, heparin tolerance, prothrombin index, protein, AT, procedure type (P=0.000-0.031). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and N0-12 (rank=1), thrombocytes/CC (rank=2), segmented neutrophils/CC (3), eosinophils/CC (4), erythrocytes/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), stick neutrophils/CC (8), leucocytes/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (error=0.000; area under ROC curve=1.0).
Here is the updated list of Top Best Ayurvedic medicine for Gas and Indigestion and those are Gas-O-Go Syp for Dyspepsia | Lavizyme Syrup for Acidity | Yumzyme Hepatoprotective Capsules etc
1. By:
Ashish Singh Rajput
M.Pharm(Pharmaceutics)
Institute of Chemical Techniology, Mumbai
2. The authors’ central obligation is to present a
concise, accurate account of the research
performed as well as an objective discussion of its
significance.
A paper should contain sufficient detail and
references to public sources of information to
permit others to access the work.
It is unethical for an author to publish manuscripts
describing essentially the same research in more
than one journal of primary publication.
Submitting the same manuscript to more than one
journal concurrently is unethical and unacceptable.
3. When an error is discovered in a published work, it
is the obligation of all authors to promptly retract
the paper or correct the results.
Authors must obtain permission for use of any
previously published materials from the original
publisher.
4. It is an essential component of the scientific enterprise, and
all scientists have an obligation to participate in the process.
Reviewers should judge objectively the quality of the
research reported and respect the intellectual independence
of the authors
Reviewers should explain and support their judgments in
such a way that editors and authors may understand the basis
of their comments.
5. The editor of a journal has complete
responsibility and authority to accept a
submitted paper for publication or to reject it.
The editor and the editorial staff should not
disclose any information about a manuscript
under consideration to anyone other than
reviewers and potential reviewers.
An editor should give prompt and unbiased
consideration to all manuscripts offered for
publication
6. As part of the assignment, the author warrants and
represents that the assigned work does not infringe the
copyright or violate any other right of any third party.
Publication of articles does not infringe the patent rights
of any party because journal is not practicing any
invention by merely publishing an article.
If a third party claims that an article infringes his or her
copyrighted material, journal has to conducts a thorough
examination of that claim and takes appropriate action.
Publisher does not mediate disputes between scientists
other than when issues of copyright arise.
7. The corresponding author must have the
approval of all other listed authors for the
submission and publication of all versions of the
manuscript.
The submitted manuscript must contain
unpublished original work and not be under
consideration for publication by any other
journal.
Plagiarism or self-plagiarism constitutes
unethical scientific behavior and is never
acceptable.
8. Fragmentation of research papers is not
acceptable. Publications should be organized so
that each paper gives a complete account of a
particular aspect of the research.
Criticism of a paper in either a Comment or
article must be professional, substantive, and
free of polemics.
If any of the preceding guidelines ceases to be
true, the authors have a duty to notify the Editor
as soon as possible so that corrective action can
be taken.
9. Retraction notices are
increasing rapidly. In the early
2000s, only about 30 retraction
notices appeared annually.
This year, the Web of Science
is on track to index more than
400 .
The total number of papers
published has risen by only
44% over the past decade.
In surveys, around 1–2% of
scientists admit to having
fabricated, falsified or modified
data or results at least once.
10. Corrections are published if the publication
record is seriously affected, for example with
regard to the scientific accuracy of published
information.
A PDF version of the correction is added to
the original article PDF so that the original
article PDF will remain the same as the
printed page and readers downloading the
PDF will receive the original article plus
amendment.
12. 1. Errata:-Errata concern the amendment of mistakes
introduced by the journal in editing or production,
including errors of omission.
2. Corrigenda :-submitted by the original authors are
published if the scientific accuracy or reproducibility of
the original paper is compromised.
3. Addenda :-are judged on the significance of the addition
to the interpretation of the original publication.
4. Retraction:- Infringements of professional ethical codes,
such as multiple submission, bogus claims of
authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data, or the
like, will also result in an article being retracted.
13. Plagiarism is the act of presenting the words,
ideas, images, sounds, or the creative expression
of others as your own.
14.
15. SOURCE USED:
The wind erosion problem of the southern Great Plains did not occur because
farmers grew too much wheat, but because the drought prevented them
from growing hardly any wheat at all from 1932 to 1940. During years of
normal precipitation, the excessive root system of the wheat plants held the
soil and offered excellent protection against wind erosion. In the droughty
Thirties, however, the inadequate moisture supply prevented a suitable
growth of ground cover in the early Spring “blow season” of February,
March, and April.
STUDENT PAPER:
"The wind erosion problem of the southern Great Plains did not occur
because farmers grew too much wheat, but because the drought prevented
them from growing hardly any wheat at all from 1932 to 1940” (Hurt,
1981, p. 29-30).
APA reference:
Hurt, R. D. (1981). The dust bowl: An agricultural and social history.
Chicago: Nelson-Hall
16. No, it is not.
Since the quoted material is enclosed in quotation
marks and because the source is cited correctly
and completely, this is not an incident of
plagiarism.
17. SOURCE USED:
The wind erosion problem of the southern Great Plains did not occur because
farmers grew too much wheat, but because the drought prevented them
from growing hardly any wheat at all from 1932 to 1940. During years of
normal precipitation, the excessive root system of the wheat plants held the
soil and offered excellent protection against wind erosion. In the droughty
Thirties, however, the inadequate moisture supply prevented a suitable
growth of ground cover in the early Spring “blow season” of February,
March, and April. The drought then began a chain of events, the first of
which was crop failure.
STUDENT PAPER:
During years of normal precipitation, the excessive root system of the
wheat plant helps to hold the soil in place and lessens wind erosion. During
the 1930s, however, drought prevented farmers from growing almost any
wheat at all, and this prevented the growth of necessary ground cover. This
crop failure was the first in a chain of events that resulted in the Dust Bowl.
18. Yes, this is plagiarism.
Even if any piece of information is taken from
conclusion of other’s work, than credit has been
correctly given to the author.
19. No as such Punishments is
given
Retracon and Rejection of
paper.
Notification to the institution
or agencies which funded
the research.
Institution can be black
listed.
Public notoriety or damage
to personal reputation.