Netflix is analyzing strategies for entering the video-on-demand (VOD) market as its DVD rental business declines. There are three main impediments to VOD adoption: connectivity, content availability, and technology adoption. Netflix has strengths like its large customer base and recommendation system, but weaknesses like slower DVD delivery versus instant streaming. The alternatives are licensing content, standalone streaming, or a separate online video business. The recommendation is for Netflix to pursue licensing agreements to build an online movie library for streaming. This should leverage Netflix's brand while the DVD business declines slowly. In the long run, as bandwidth and devices improve, streaming partnerships may decline but licensing will remain important.
Netflix’s unique DVD rental service has revolutionized the industry. They successfully took the best of traditional conventions (like physical media, the U.S. Postal Service) and mixed them with new world internet-conventions. They have also effectively managed to discourage competition from both more established businesses and new entrants. The future growth of Netflix as it expands into streaming media, poses challenges in legal, infrastructure/technology, and through additional costs. In order to remain competitive, it is imperative that Netflix partner with companies with global reach to overcome these challenges. This presentation was part of an MBA class assignment to audit and industry in the the technology sector. The presentation has multiple authors listed on the title page. If you would like copies of the executive summary, complete S.W.O.T. analysis, and/or the transcript of the presentation please PRIVATE MESSAGE ME and I will email it to you.
Netflix’s unique DVD rental service has revolutionized the industry. They successfully took the best of traditional conventions (like physical media, the U.S. Postal Service) and mixed them with new world internet-conventions. They have also effectively managed to discourage competition from both more established businesses and new entrants. The future growth of Netflix as it expands into streaming media, poses challenges in legal, infrastructure/technology, and through additional costs. In order to remain competitive, it is imperative that Netflix partner with companies with global reach to overcome these challenges. This presentation was part of an MBA class assignment to audit and industry in the the technology sector. The presentation has multiple authors listed on the title page. If you would like copies of the executive summary, complete S.W.O.T. analysis, and/or the transcript of the presentation please PRIVATE MESSAGE ME and I will email it to you.
Case study over current position of Netflix and where it is heading. AFI framework was used to provide insight into new viable strategies with recommendations on how Netflix can maintain a competitive advantage in the future.
Netflix Infographic and Report (NETS2003/NETS5006) Karen Wong
The following infographic and report was created for a group assignment.
All media cited remains property of and copyright to the respective rights holders.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution
CC BY-NC. For more information, go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
An IIT - BHU , competition slides for finding business expansion solution for Netflix(a video content provider) in competitive business environment in Indian entertainment industry.
Case study over current position of Netflix and where it is heading. AFI framework was used to provide insight into new viable strategies with recommendations on how Netflix can maintain a competitive advantage in the future.
Netflix Infographic and Report (NETS2003/NETS5006) Karen Wong
The following infographic and report was created for a group assignment.
All media cited remains property of and copyright to the respective rights holders.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution
CC BY-NC. For more information, go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
An IIT - BHU , competition slides for finding business expansion solution for Netflix(a video content provider) in competitive business environment in Indian entertainment industry.
Der Home-Video-Markt unterlag in den letzten Jahren einem extremen Wandel. Im Rahmen der Bearbeitung des HBR-Cases wird der Wandel des Geschäftsmodells von Netflix besprochen. Dabei wird vor dem Hintergrund der Änderung der Marktgegebenheiten als auch der Änderungen interner Organisation und Ressourcen auf den Wandel des Netflix-Geschäftsmodells eingegangen. Die Theorie von Geschäftsmodellen wird kurz erklärt. Zusätzlich wird diskutiert, ob und wie man Geschäftsmodelle bewerten kann. Hierzu werden eine Systematik und einige gängige Ansätze aufgezeigt.
This case study was done as a part of my class assignment for Introduction of Analytics. It explains how Netflix uses Big Data and why is so successful.
Why I chose Netflix
Netflix: Stepping into Streaming
CLV used in Netflix
How Netflix uses Big Data and Analytics
Latest Relevant News!!
Conclusion
One More Episode An Industry and Competitive Analysis for Netfl.docxhopeaustin33688
One More Episode: An Industry and Competitive Analysis for Netflix
David Bazile
Abstract
This study is to provide a thorough analysis of Netflix as a corporation. Netflix shows their competences such as their brand image and their leadership in the streaming industry as well how they take consumer opinion into what goes on their website. The following paper will demonstrate an overview of Netflix and the video streaming service industry. This paper will then focus on the external and internal analysis of the company using matrices such as Porter’s Five Forces, External Forces Evaluation (EFE), Internal Forces Evaluation (IFE), and the SPACE tool. These matrices has been analyzed but strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats have been identified used in the TOWS matrix. Focusing on different alternative business strategies, the paper shows possible solutions for different identified problems of Netflix. Some of the Problems that Netflix will be facing is the saturation of the Industry but through the use of Market Penetration and Development Netflix can make it out okay. The paper will then be concluded with how the implementations of the proposed solutions can strengthen Netflix’s position in the streaming industry.
______________________________________________________________________________
1. Introduction
Netflix was co-founded by both Reed Hastings and Marc Randolph in 1997. The goal was to offer online movie rentals in Scotts Valley, California. Hastings wanted to be able to rent movies on the internet. There was also an old discredited story that claims that “Hastings had the idea after Blockbuster charged him a $40 late fee for ‘Apollo 13.’” In 1999, Netflix begins to use the subscription service that allows consumers to rent unlimited movies for one low subscription. In the year 2000, Netflix launches the personalized movie recommendation system that uses member’s ratings to predict choices for Netflix’s customers as well as recommend newer content to the same customers. In May of 2002 Netflix announces its IPO offering 5,500,000 at the price of $15.00 per share under the name NFLX. In 2005 Netflix reaches 4.2 million people. Netflix first introduces streaming which allows members to instantly watch television shows and movies from their computer in 2007 making them a pioneer in this industry. A year later Netflix partners with consumer electronic companies to stream on Xbox, Blu-ray disc players and TV set up boxes. PS3, internet controlled televisions and other internet connected devices came a year later in 2009. In 2010 it is available on Apple devices, the Nintendo Wii and they launched in Canada. The next year, in 2011, Netflix launched in Latin America and the Caribbean. In 2012, Netflix launches in Europe and they won their first Primetime Emmy Engineering Award. The year after Netflix expands to the Netherlands and Netflix also received 31 Emmy and wins 3 of them for its original content. Finally, last year, Netflix .
This was a final project for IMC 618 - PR Concepts & Strategy. This Public Relations plan spanned 9 weeks and was the final execution for my chosen client, Netflix.
1. Chartrand, Wong, Li, and Sun 1
SUNY BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY
GLOBAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT (MGMT 411-05)
October 29, 2015
Authored by: Wyatt A. Chartrand, Mengyao Li, Justin Wong, and Yingli Sun
Strategic Analysis
2. Chartrand, Wong, Li, and Sun 2
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................3
Background and History ..................................................................................................................4
Issues to be Analyzed.......................................................................................................................4
Internal Analysys .........................................................................................................................4, 5
External Analysis .........................................................................................................................5, 6
Alternatives………………………………………………………………………………………..6
Recommendations……………………………………………………………………………6, 7, 8
Implementations...............................................................................................................................8
Appendix……………………………………………………………………………..……9, 10, 11
Sources…………………………………………………………………………………………...12
3. Chartrand, Wong, Li, and Sun 3
Executive Summary
The emergence of VOD (“video on demand”) technology threatened Netflix’s DVD
(“digital versatile disc” or “digital video disc”) rental business. As Reed Hastings, the founder
and CEO of Netflix stated, Netflix’s purpose was not to provide DVD rentals through the
Internet but rather to allow for the best home video viewing for its customers. Netflix is now
preparing to enter the VOD market. However, there are three large impediments for Netflix to
the widespread adoption of VOD, the first of which are the connectivity between a user’s
computer and television. Secondly, the current limitation of available content, and lastly, the
adoption of the technology itself. The next step that Netflix needs to focus on is to determine
one viable overarching strategy that can generate competitive advantage in the VOD market.
Netflix currently has a large online membership. In this analysis, the internal and external
strengths and weaknesses Netflix has will be broken down, after a brief overview of the
company’s background and current issues. The possible alternatives for a course of action for
Netflix will then be presented as well our final strategic recommendation on the tradeoffs Netflix
needs to take to succeed in the new VOD market. Finally, we give some possible
implementation strategies for Netflix to execute on in order to make our recommendations
utilizable. Included at the end are two graphical diagrammatic representations, one of Netflix’s
strengths and weaknesses in its industry and the other a summary of our recommendation for
Netflix. Two sources have also been cited for this work.
4. Chartrand, Wong, Li, and Sun 4
Brief Backgroundand History
Netflix was founded in 1997 by Reed Hastings. The company began as an online service
to rent movies on DVD. Instead of attempting to lure customers to a traditional brick-and-mortar
location, Netflix offered deliveries of their DVDs by mail straight to the consumer’s home.
Initially the pricing model charged customers for each rental, but by 1999 Netflix had introduced
a monthly no-late-fee subscription model. This allowed consumers to rent unlimited DVDs for a
single monthly rate.
Issues to be Analyzed
Netflix’s entrance into the VOD market and online streaming services:
The three primary impediments to widespread adoption of VOD: movie
recommendations, product delivery, and technology adoption.
Strategies regarding Netflix’s rental and streaming business among three possible
alternatives.
Lack of an obvious customer base for any online viewing feature.
Analysis
Internal.
o Strengths.
1. Customer loyalty—make the service one that former customers would
return to.
2. Recommendation system.
A. Proprietary algorithm to recommend films to consumers.
B. A filter placed between the output of the recommendation system
and the results shown to customers.
5. Chartrand, Wong, Li, and Sun 5
C. Personalized aspect of Netflix’s service to customers.
3. Large market share of online customers, size, and growth rate.
4. More distribution centers across the country, reducing the delivery time
significantly and growing their relationship with the United States Postal
Service (USPS).
5. “No late fee” subscription model.
A. Adopted a monthly subscription model which enabled customers to
rent unlimited films per month.
o Weaknesses.
1. Delivery time of the video rentals compared to instant VOD access.
External.
o Competitive environment.
Video rental business—Blockbuster.
VOD businesses—Vongo, CinemaNow, MovieBeam, and Blockbuster
(after acquiring MovieLink).
o Technological complementors—cable TV.
o Entry—low barrier to entry, but high rivalry of existing competitors.
o Suppliers—video rental, a small number of movie distributors, direct revenue-
sharing agreements with nearly all of the major studios after the year 2000.
o Buyers—large number of buyers for focal firm’s output, the product being sold is
differentiated because of the web portal and delivery, people use more money on
entertainment than before and the product is therefore valuable to the buyers.
o Substitutes—VOD offered by traditional cable and satellite companies.
6. Chartrand, Wong, Li, and Sun 6
o See attached Porter’s Five Forces Model in Appendix for graphical summary
(Graphic #1).
Alternatives
The three alternatives for Netflix’s online video and DVD rental strategies are:
1. Licensing arrangement.
2. Streaming online video.
3. Stand-alone online video business.
Recommendations
Our recommendation regarding the strategy Netflix should take is to pursue building an
online movie library for customers to stream.
o This should be achieved via the first alternative, which is licensing agreements.
o While it may not be in Netflix’s best interest to partner with a cable or satellite
TV competitor, it makes strategic sense for Netflix to continue to develop
licensing agreements with major movie studios and channels.
o We do not believe that a standalone online DVD business would be a good
recommendation, as the brand recognition that Netflix is building would be lost if
they spun off their DVD service into a different strategic business unit.
o The DVD rental business, while in decline, should serve Netflix well as an
ancillary business alongside its growing online subscription-based streaming
business, which is poised to overtake rentals.
o The DVD rental business can slowly be grandfathered out. See graphical
representation in the Appendix (Graphic #2).
7. Chartrand, Wong, Li, and Sun 7
There is a strong likelihood that Netflix could partner with existing cable companies.
o They partnered with the USPS to outsource delivery to their customers and cable
would be another medium that they can use.
Netflix has their recommendation system, which they should leverage to have customers
pay a higher price to view content from them due to some price elasticity.
o This option is also viable because of the technology that cable companies have;
they are able to directly beam the content to a user’s television without having to
worry about an individual’s internet capabilities.
o However, with the advancement of technology, in the near future we believe that
the partnership between Netflix and cable will decline because users will have
access to better bandwidths and will be able to stream directly to their televisions.
In the meantime, because Netflix has a large market share of online customers, it should
not focus solely on licensing arrangements with other companies.
o We recommend that Netflix integrate an online streaming video feature into their
core offering as well.
o Offering a new feature to its existing market, would, we believe, attract more
online users in order to compete with other stand-alone sites.
o Expending more cash on content acquisition and software and website
development is unavoidable, but the cost of its distribution centers and DVD
delivery would decline in tandem with market demand.
Spinning off a stand-alone DVD rental service would mean that Netflix would be shifting
to a model similar to that of its start-up competitors such as Vongo or MovieLink, which
8. Chartrand, Wong, Li, and Sun 8
means that Netflix would no longer have the advantage of being a complete offering
compared to its competitors.
o Additionally, a standalone business would take away from the brand recognition
Netflix currently has with its consumers. This could be a great business risk for
Netflix as it already has a successful share of the traditional DVD rental business.
o Moreover, this strategic decision would directly result in a draining of both
human and technological resources because Netflix would need separate support
systems for this new service, even if it was only ancillary.
Implementations
How Netflix can carry out this strategy:
o Reach out to current content suppliers to further strengthen relationships to
Netflix’s advantage and execute efficiently in order to develop partnerships with
new suppliers to grow their online library.
Who can do what:
Studios and content providers can license content to stream, or rent upon terms
acceptable to Netflix.
A number of partners can offer instant streaming of content from Netflix to
various devices.
Organizational structure and control:
o Hire, promote, and offer competitive salaries to computer programmers and
software engineers in order to build out the online infrastructure of Netflix’s
website in order to support increased traffic and streaming.
10. Chartrand, Wong, Li, and Sun 10
Explanatory Sample of Graphic #1—Porter’s Five Forces
11. Chartrand, Wong, Li, and Sun 11
Graphic #2—Graphical Summary of Primary Recommendation
Build streaming library and
devlop stronger, more
advantageous supplier
relationships.
Build streaming business to
eventually replace rental
business but keep rental
and streaming business
under one brand.
Grandfather out rental
business but do not spin it
off in order to avoid brand
confusion.
12. Chartrand, Wong, Li, and Sun 12
Sources
Netflix Logo. 2014. Netflix, Los Gatos. Web. 19 Sept. 2015.
<https://www.google.com/search?site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=6
02&q=Netflix%27s+New+Logo&oq=Netflix%27s+New+Logo&gs_l=img.3.0i30j0i8i30.
281.6924.0.7173.26.19.7.0.0.0.121.1626.14j4.18.0.ccy>.
Shih, Willy, Stephen Kaufman, and David Spinola. Netflix. Boston: Harvard Business School,
2007. 1-13. Harvard University. Web. 2 Sept. 2015. <file:///C:/Users/Wyatt/Documents/
SUNY%20Binghamton%20Classes_WC/Global%20Strategic%20Management%20(MG
MT%20411)_WC/Case%20Studies_WC/Netflix_WC.pdf>.
United States Department of Justice. United States of America, 26 Oct. 2006. Web. 28 Sept.
2015. <http://www.justice.gov/atr/david-reibstein-presentation>.