Panopticon Of Technology

Panopticon Of Technology
The Panopticon of modern technology. Although modern technological gadgets have had positive
effects, they have also had negative effects. For instance, in North Korea most people have access to
the internet, called Kwangmyong, but it is completely walled off from the outside world. The North
Korean government manages to use technology to further its own agenda by limiting the amount
and type of information that is available to its population to avoid a movement like the Arab Spring.
The work of Foucault in his book Discipline and Punish is an allegory of the North Korean
government's use of the internet and modern technology. For example, Foucault stated in his work
that the success of disciplinary power results from the use of simple instruments; ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In our contemporary societies, it is encouraged to be an entrepreneur, to invent or to innovate. With
new inventions such as the Google Glass, smartphones, and smart watches, it is becoming
increasingly easier for monopolies such as Amazon, Google, and Apple to influence the public in
ways that we cannot fathom, similar to Bentham's model of the Panopticon. These major capitalist
corporations create technological gadgets that become an extension of us, and Haraway further
confirmed this by stating in the Cyborg Manifesto that the machine is becoming an extension of us,
our processes, a part of our embodiment (1991: 180). As a result of our dependence on these
gadgets, it is even easier for corporations and governments to control, monitor, and influence the
general public. Therefore, the agency of the general public has decreased in ways that were not
possible before. For example, if I were to search on Google "insurance," the results would not be
objective, but based on a system that I have no influence over, meaning my agency has decreased by
the simple fact that the Google search engine is making a decision on what the top suggestions are
for me. As humans become more dependent on these technological gadgets and the blurring of lines
between what a means to be a human and a technological gadget decreases, our agency reduces even
more, by the simple fact that the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Between Panopticon And The Schooling System Essay
From the concrete walls, the schematics of Architecture and even the way that we are taught, school
can remind us of a type of prison. We are taught by repetition and to regurgitate information rather
than actually go in depth to understand the topic. We are ready to absorb information and not
question said info. We are like fishes swimming in a bowl, unable to comprehend what exists
outside of our own sphere of learning. In an essay written by Foucault, he talks about the idea of the
Panopticon. When reading his essay, it becomes clear there are striking similarities between the
Panopticon and the schooling system. It is my intent to show how both the schooling system and the
Panopticon strip Individuality away because of mechanical teaching. This will be conveyed by
showing the comparisons of the Panopticon and the schooling system through the topics of how
describing the similarity of the two locations and lead into the course of Surveillance on both
subjects. I will then lead into the topic of Discipline shaping behavior and will finalize with
discussing how the general architecture of schools and the Panopticon are similar.
The schooling system often teaches a rather mechanical approach to learning as we are placed in a
situation where learning is forced and a requirement to get through society's means of, 'a future for
ourselves ' and to be part of a respected status quo. Surely the idea of graduating from an institution
of knowledge does have many benefits

Is The Panopticon In The Pork Punish: The Birth Of The...
Unlike Balram and the poor villagers who are dazed by the imposing structures and icons in Delhi,
the educated Ashok is unable to remain quiet. He voices his disapproval to his brother Mukesh,
while Balram drives them through the streets of Delhi. When they come across a bronze statue of
Gandhi leading a group of people from "darkness to light," its irony strikes Ashok as it comes upon
them almost immediately after bribing a politician to curry favours with him. He blurts out to
Mukesh in anger and dismay: "We're driving past Gandhi, after just having given a bribe to a
minister. It's a fucking joke, isn't it? It is a fucking joke – our political system – and I'll keep saying
it as long as I like" (79). The worldly–wise Mukesh who is better ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In Foucault's influential work, Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison (1975), he argues that
discipline enables individuals to perform the duties assigned to them within the new forms of
economic, political, and military organisations emerging in the modern age. Foucault's argument is
that discipline creates docile bodies, ideal for the modern age – bodies that function well within
academic, administrative, service and manufacturing frameworks. In a refined world, there are
subtle methods to maintain order and discipline and keep the system functioning. To construct docile
bodies the disciplinary institutions must be able to constantly observe and record the bodies they
control and ensure the internalisation of the disciplinary individuality within the bodies being
controlled. That is, discipline must be enforced without excessive force and only by way of keen
supervision; the moulding of bodies into exact forms must be done through observation alone. This
requires a particular form of institution which Foucault exemplifies using Jeremy Bentham's

Panopticon Theory In Lord Of The Flies
Imagine a society with no rules where chaos, violence, and evil are paramount; there is no absolute
leader and disputes are constant. This vision was a reality in William Golding's Lord of the Flies. In
this novel, a group of young British boys are stranded on an island due to a fatal plane crash. While
trying to provide for themselves and survive during this crisis, they struggle to find order. The rival
characters, Ralph and Jack, compete for ultimate power, but due to opposing views, the two cannot
agree on strategies to survive. Jack leads the boys away from reason, law, and order while
influencing the boys towards savagery, reckless hunting tactics, and violence. This resulted in
unnecessary death. However, the opposite parallel to this society is one with constant supervision
where misbehaving does not occur. This society is controlled by the Panopticon theory created by
Michel Foucault, which is a unique prison that gave the inmates the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The building had the shape of a ring, where the middle area was a central observation room and the
outside was lined with cells. The guard was able to observe all of the cells, but the prisoners did not
know whether they were spied upon or not. This sense of always being watched provided a reason
for the prisoners to behave and act appropriately. In Golding's Lord of the Flies, the boys' behavior
on the island supports Foucault's concept of society because they demonstrate how an ideal society
deteriorates when there is no enforcement of rules or laws due to antagonistic beliefs, lack of respect
for authority, and savagery.
One cause of the decline of the boys' society in Lord of the Flies is their opposing beliefs. The two
leaders, Jack and Ralph, often had

Explain The Panopticon By Michel Foucault
According to Michel Foucault, power is knowledge and knowledge is power. He also believed that
as individuals, everyone will react to situations in different ways. Foucault said that power "reaches
into the very grain of individuals, touches their bodies and inserts itself into their actions and
attitudes, their discourses, learning processes and everyday lives."1 Foucault believed that
knowledge is always a form of power, but he took it a step further and told us that knowledge can be
gained from power. Through observation, new knowledge is produced. Foucault presents these
thoughts in the following manner.
"Knowledge linked to power, not only assumes the authority of 'the truth' but has the power to make
itself true. All knowledge, once applied ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This building allowed the guard, who was usually located in the center tower, to monitor every
prisoner while no prisoner could see the guard. This created an illusion of being monitored even
when the guard was not looking at a particular inmate. This constant observation acted as a control
mechanism; a consciousness of constant surveillance is internalized. According to us, the
documentation of Sijil was similar to a Panopticon prison. It gave the Ottoman state, an ability to
constantly monitor every subject by recording them into Sijils. The documentation of its subjects
and the territorialisation of Sharia law can be considered as the process of govenrmentality (2nd
point above) in Ottoman empire. By documenting the different parameters of its subject, the state
always knew how, what and when to exercise its power. This 'How–What–When' represents the
knowledge which is required to yield power and power again gives them the ability to further
observe them and these new observations lead to new knowledge and news ways of exercising
power. Thus it becomes a vicious

Discipline And Punish By Michel Foucault
In the article, Discipline and Punish by Michel Foucault, he describes a social theory called
panopticism. In Foucault's panopticism he talks about the panopticon, an architectural plan that was
created by Jeremy Bentham. The Prison structure of the twenty first century uses that same building
design as the panopticon. We see how the plague town in the Panopticism shows a chain of
authority. Prisons in the twenty first century use the same style of chain of authority in their
correctional institutes. The panopticon brings out a lot of mental effect to the prisoners when they
are sent into the cell. Prisoners in today 's society society go through the same mental effects of
inmates in the Panopticon. The ideas of panopticism are relevant to the development of the twenty
first century through building structure, a chain of authority command, guard surveillance, and
mental effects that prisoners go through.
Foucault uses Bentham's panopticon, a design for a model prison, as a symbol for disciple methods
that operates through a variety of ideas. The Panopticon was architectural design that has cells in a
circular structure with a central watchtower that was above the cells. In the article Foucault and the
Architecture of Surveillance: Creating Regimes of Power in Schools, Shrines, and Society by Joseph
Piro he states , "The Panopticon is a prison that is built radially, so that one guard positioned in its
center can view all prisoners. Foucault mapped out the origins of the

Analysis: The Plague Of Panopticon
Roosevelt Go Professor Powers English 110 31 August 2016 Panopticon The plague that happened
in the seventeenth century later demonstrated the work of panopticism. Everything was chaotic in
the beginning until things started being regulated. Quarantine was needed for the best of the
community and to be able to take control of the situation. Since things were extremely chaotic,
people's freedom were taken away for the sake of others. Of course they didn't want the virus to
spread so they had to keep everyone on track and observe them. This then displayed disciplinary
mechanisms. When Foucault talked about the plague, he tried to emphasize on what it took to
restore order back to the community. He tried to emphasize on what it took to regain

Michel Foucault And The Panopticon
I am actually very familiar with Michel Foucault, and most criminology students are familiar with
his idea (from Jeremy Bentham) of the panopticon and it will come up time and again. The
information I already knew of was all reestablished in reading through this chapter, "Panopticism",
from Discipline and Punish. I knew that the panopticon was the idea of a tower in a prison where a
guard could look and see every prisoner. However, the prisoners do not always know when there are
guards are in the prison, so they will alter their behaviour even if they believe that they are being
watched. It all concerns surveillance curving and controlling human behaviour. There are two key
principles with the panopticon: the visibility of power (the guard tower where everyone can see that
power exists), and unverifiable power (one is not sure when one is being watched). Importantly, "the
Panopticon must not be understood as a dream building: it is the diagram of a mechanism of power
reduced to its ideal form" (Foucault, 1975, p. 511). Ultimately, in Foucault's panopticon, disciplinary
power is executed through surveillance and knowledge. Although I have decent foundational
knowledge on the panopticon, I still learned from this reading. I was particularly fascinated with the
proposition that the panopticon may have been inspired by Le Vaux's menagerie at Versailles.
Foucault explains, "the Panopticon is a royal menagerie; the animal is replaced by man, individual
distribution by specific

Panopticon Essay
The author of the essay "Panopticism", Michel Foucault gives his opinion on power and discipline
in Panopticism. He describes Jeremy Bentham's "Panopticon", a tower in the centre of a room which
has vision to every cell, generalized for prisoners. In simple words, it functioned in maintaining
discipline throughout the jail. It's most distinctive feature was that; prisoners could be seen without
ever seeing. Prisoners would never really know when they are watched and when not. They are
always under the impression that someone is keeping an eye on them continuously and if anything
goes wrong, or they make mistake, they would be punished severely. Since, a prisoner would never
know when he/she is watched, they have to be at their best. In a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
I can relate this to myself. I go to Harbor Point Gym. It is fairly huge with ample of machines and
cardio equipments. There is another room for people who wants to practice yoga and meditate.
While working out at the gym, I am always guarded about myself being watched by other people,
peers passing by the gym, cameras at the gym etc. it's a human tendency and people really do look
and analyze people. There's always a thought running at the back of my mind what if other people
saw me or made fun of me. This thought makes me behave in a right, well–mannered way. Nobody
forced me to behave in a certain way but it was that creepy thought of myself being mocked. I did
not just behaved well but also pushed myself a little extra. Also, there are treadmills kept closer to
one another. This in turn makes one conscious about their selves. This helps me relate to the idea of
Foucault's Panopticon where he describes "Visibility as a trap"(). What he means by this is, being
visible at times is also a trap. You can be caught anytime if you are doing something incorrect. In my
example of a treadmill, another person also using the treadmill watches you. You are constantly
conscious and try to look what the other person is up to and try to compete him/her. This generates a
competitive spirit and thus, people push themselves in order to prove their selves. It not only
enhances your body but also aids in developing self–confidence.

Panopticon Watchtower
Foucault himself uses the example of the watchtower in prisons when he describes what the
panopticon is. From the tower, you can see all of the prison cells, but the prisoners cannot see the
guards, and hence cannot see if they are being watched at any given time. They do know that there is
a possibility, and therefore, they self–monitor and restrict their behaviors accordingly. This way, the
power becomes as much of an internal factor in the prisoners as it is an external factor from the
guards.
One could argue that the Panopticon is very relevant and present in today's society, for example in
the fact that the Internet is being monitored, and your conversations online are being logged. You are
never sure if anyone will see what you're writing,

What Was Bentham Visualize Foucault's Panopticon?
Rebecca Steinberg
Baran Germen
WR 122
Essay One Proposal Assignment
10 October 2014 Jeremy Bentham visualized the Panopticon as being arranged with a central tower
and small cells in a larger building circling the tower. Patients, school children, workers, and
prisoners are held in these cells. The guards in the tower can see everything and everyone around
him in the surrounding cells, but the people inside cannot see into the tower. In this way, power is
exerted because the people within the cells never know if they are being watched or not, so they
must function within in their respective rooms as if they were being watched at any given moment.
This is an example of how visibility is used as a trap because the inmates can always see the tower,
but they "must never know whether he is being looked at any one moment; but he must be sure that
he may always be so" which means that the inmates are ultimately tricked into behaving one way all
the time, even if no one is watching them from within the tower. (Foucault 286) Is panopticism an
effective form of discipline? Is the power within the Panopticon ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Foucault suggests that the "panoptic mechanism arranges spatial unities that make it possible to see
constantly and to recognize immediately" which uses reverse techniques of a prison by using
visibility as a trap. (286) The Panopticon revolved around this separation of individuals which in
turn allowed it to function effectively. This is so because the separated individuals no longer had
identities and their whole time within the panopticon was focused on behaving as if they were being
watched even if they weren't. This is how the space made it "possible to see constantly and to
recognize immediately" which is what Foucault is suggesting in the quote.

Michel Foucault's Panopticon
In "Discipline and Punish" of Michel Foucault, the author mentions the Panopticon in order to make
the world better by partitioning and controlling each small group or individual, force them to behave
morally. This concept turns out to be one of the most popular theory which is represent in The
Hunger Games – a famous novel of Suzanne Collins, through how the Capitol televises and directs
all 12 Districts as a whole and the tributes in arena during the Hunger Games. Panopticon, or social
media in the modern society, is also emphasizing its isolating power to the youth at the present.
Beginning with the description of how measures was taken to fight against the plague in the
seventeenth century, Foucault then discusses about Jeremy Bentham's ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
While Katniss wishes that she was not recorded so she could be herself, the teenagers today feels
like they are ignored without other people get involve in their own lives. Why do they have such
those feelings? Panopticism might be the best answer. Remember that in those structure, each
individual can be seen but cannot communicate with others. Same thing happens to the youth when
they do not feel connected to the surroundings. The youth always say they are lonely and they do not
have people who they can count on or have close relationship with. So they publish themselves to
get noticed, to be known, to be cared, to be talked about. They also seek affection by simply or
secretly getting any semblance of relationship they can find, such as friend on Facebook who they
have never met or any video of celebrities on YouTube (Simmerman

Panopticon
The principle of the "panopticon" is simple: a central tower allows jailers to monitor, without being
seen, all the actions of the prisoners locked in cells in a ring encircling the tower building. At the
periphery there is a ring building; in the center there is a turn; it is breakthrough large windows that
open onto the inner face of the ring; the peripheral building is divided into cells, each of which
crosses the entire the thickness of the building; they have two windows, one inwardly corresponding
to the tower windows; the other overlooking the outside, allows light to pass through the cell from
one side. By the effect against the light, one can enter the tower, standing out exactly light, small
captive silhouettes in the cells of the peripheral series. There is so many cages, so many small
theaters, in which each detainee is alone, perfectly individualized and constantly visible. The
advantage of a panoptic device landscape spatial units is that we can be seen all the time and
recognized immediately. To summarize, we reverse the principle of the dungeon/solitary
confinement; or rather of its three functions – lock, exclude light and hide – it keeps only the ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Chastise the rebel body, the unruly body. Dissuade again. In addition, this "micro–penalty" should
not be confused with the great state judicial mechanisms, as if there was only one power, state
power, and political power. Next to a great power, there are ubiquitous in our society a lot of micro–
powers, allowing eddy distinguish and oppose the law and the norm. The law is what applies to
individuals from outside, primarily in connection with an offense, the standard is that which applies
to individuals within, as it is for her to reach their interiority even imposing their conduct a specific

How Does The Image Of The Panopticon Help Describe How...
1. According to Foucault, what's the intended impact of the panopticon on individuals? The intended
impact of the panopticon is to create a sense of vigilance on individuals that would make them think
twice before committing a crime like they would be under a state of mind that they are always being
watched.
2. How does the image of the panopticon help describe how power works? The image of the
panopticon helps describe how power works because there is a person in the middle watching
everything while remaining invisible. This relates to how power works because power its like
influencing individuals to follow a set of rules without causing them harm because its embedded in
the people to know that they have to follow rules.
3. According to the Foucault excerpt, what's the significance of visibility (surveillance) for the
operation of power? The significance of visibility for the operation of power is that people would
think that any person is watching them at every moment it could be their families, so the person
wont commit any crimes. This is the operation of power because the power of thinking that someone
could catch them committing a crime would stop them, so the idea of power is indirect because they
idea of being caught influence them to think twice before committing any crime.
4. How is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
How does McSwuggen's critique relate to the excerpt from Foucault? McSwuggen's critique relates
to Foucault`s excerpt because it demonstrates how the different products or designs change the way
we act and think, as McSwuggen stated how in the Victorian Age servants were put into different
house with bad quality furniture to make them see that they were inferior to their masters. This
portrays the idea of power being used indirectly, by making the servants stay in low–end houses and
equipment is like a remainder that they are lesser than their masters. The people that designed the
products are influencing the way we thing, so they are the watchers and we are the

System And Oppression Of The Panopticon
2.3.2. Panoptical System and Oppression The Panopticon was a metaphor that allowed Foucault to
show the relationship between the people in a disciplinary situation and the systems of social
control. From his view, the concept of power/knowledge comes from observing others. Michel
Foucault is one of the European philosopher/historian who wrote prodigiously and influentially on
the origins or 'archaeology' of European social orders since the seventeenth century. For
understanding of his work on social control is central to 'Siberian' section of Nights at the Circus,
especially chapter 3 and 4 show the escape of a group of prisoners. Social order is considered by
Foucault through institutional practice or 'discourse' that apply punitive and ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
They are like so many cages, so many small theaters, in which each actor is alone, perfectly
individualized and constantly visible. The panoptic mechanism arranges spatial unities that make it
possible to see constantly and to recognize immediately. In short it reverses the principle of the
dungeon; or rather three of its functions – to enclose, to deprive of light and to hide – it preserves
only the first and eliminates the other two. Full lighting and the eye of a supervisor capture better
than darkness, which ultimately protected. Visibly is a trap. Carter shows this theatrical when she
describes 'the hours of darkness' in the female penitentiary during which 'the cell were lit up like so
many small theatres in which each actor sat by herself in the trap of her visibility'(ch.3, p.211).
According to Foucault's observation through Bentham, power is always 'visible and unverifiable'
because the system of structure ensures that prisoners will always fell they may be being watched by
invisible bystander but can never be sure whether the invisible viewer is watching them or not. The
observer's invisibility combined with the 'Fictitious' perception of total visibility amongst the
observed that acts as 'a guarantee of order'.* Fictional rhetoric and theatrical provide a situation to
show the relevance of this episode beyond the

Foucault's Panopticon
Foucault's analysis of power within institutions is persuasive, specifically his description of
Bentham's Panopticon, and the significance that power plays in modern society. In this essay, I will
argue that in numerous contemporary institutions Foucault's analysis is still relevant as tools are
developed to modify and surveille our behavior. Furthermore, Foucault begins by analyzing the
situation before the eighteenth century, when public executions, such as Damien's crime of regicide
and torture were part of most criminal investigations. Punishment was ceremonial and directed at
the prisoner's body because it was a ritual in which the audience was important. Therefore, public
execution reestablished the authority and power of the king. He ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In the article, "A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power, and the Subject" Grace (1997) correlates the
military chain of commands to Foucault's discipline rhetoric because of the customs and orders that
soldiers must conform to over time, whether it would be soldiers within the Navy, Air Force,
Marine, or the Army such as the way the march, stand, or even salute. It is because they are
disciplined and obedient in which they exhibit during training. As a result, this in itself is the very
action of molding individuals into the ideal

Foucault's Panopticon
Foucault believed that knowledge is a form of power, and that ultimately, through observation you
gain power. This main idea allowed for him to realize that, once applied to the real world,
knowledge is the most powerful tool one can have. It is evident that Foucault essentially believed
that with knowledge, one can control everything around them. Furthermore, having the power to
discipline and society. The concept of panopticism developed from the idea of disciplining society.
The panopticon was an architectural design with the main purpose of being able to have visibility on
everyone that was incarcerated. Prisoners were held in cells, which surrounded a main tower
controlled by either a general guard, or the person who upholds the power. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Bartky uses the idea that over time, women have slowly been breaking out of the power that men
had over them. They have somewhat freed themselves from being monitored and controlled by men.
This relates to panopticism in that the panopticon was essentially created in order to have full
regulation and oversight over prisoners, in this case, women. Disciplinary practices were being
ensured in order to have society (women) constantly productive as well as under control by a power
figure. Ultimately requiring people to behave properly and according to conduct which in turn,
controlled their minds as well as their bodies. In terms of modern surveillance, women are
constantly being watched by men even when they do not know of it. This is a disciplinary practice
set by the norms society has created for women, which is also known as the male gaze, essentially
creating the docile body. Foucault's idea of panopticism produced his concept that these disciplinary
practices create docile bodies which in essence means that people are being made into subjects.
Bartky uses this to explain that this has much to do with women and how they are being currently
objectified in every way possible. An example of this, is how women are being made objects for
men in the media in order to make them look desirable. This grants men all the

Panopticon Panoptical Machine
Discipline with its two facets. One where it serves as an enclosure, wherein there are negative
functions (breaking of communications, punishing of unauthorized movements), and the other
where it is a machine, wherein power is lightened but more effective (Utopian, perhaps). This
disciplinary part of the Panopticon had operated throughout the ages. Disciplinary institutions,
whether they be military, educational, or religious, flourished in the classical years. And what
processes were involved that led to this important piece of a Panoptical machine, you may ask?
First, was the "functional inversion of the disciplines." This simply means that what started out as
one thing became totally different. For example, the military started out as a

Idea Of Panopticon
Foucault idea of the panopticon is to make power in society more powerful and effective. Creating a
system that ensures a functioning way of how the people do things. Having been under surveillance
to protect the need for anything that's disorderly. But also creating too much security and restraint
for individuals. Thus causing convenience but also a downfall towards individuals. The idea of
panopticon can have its positive benefits because of the safety and security that are given to the
situations. With this system being more organized and effective to disciplining others to follow rules
and if not you would have to deal with a certain punishment. Causing society to act more obedient
to situations and minimizing crimes and bad activity.

Michel Foucault's Panopticon
Author Michel Foucault uses the Panopticon as a metaphor to define the relationship between the
discipline and punishment system, and the concept of power–knowledge. Discerning the population
equates to power and knowledge. Power is gained by the information you acquire when keeping
close tabs on people.
The Panopticon uses a different method of "discipline". Instead of torturing, using violence, and
exhibiting "power" through this way, this new system forces the inmates inside the structure to
behave because of the force it has over their mind. Since they do not know when or even if they are
being overseen, the effect is them acting as if they are being supervised at all times. Any and all
events are noted and through this observation, the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With keeping the convicts locked up in this Panopticon, intimidation isn't required to have him
behave. Since each one has their own cell, there is no worry for anyone planning a group escape.
The surveillance would keep them under control. There is not much one can do when alone and
under constant supervision. Same goes for the students. Besides this method keeping unruly
schoolchildren at bay, it also stops them from cheating off of one another. It shows which student is
actually clever and dangerous. The Panopticon can be used in a way to have the children believe
what isn't factual. "Anyone can learn anything" and none would be the wiser since that was the only
thing they were taught. Regarding workers, this establishment would reveal who manages their time
wisely and how much work they complete in however long. That way the manager would know how
much to pay each one based on the job done. The Panopticon would also stop the risk of contagion
between patients in hospitals. The central tower is built in such a way that people would never know
if anyone was in there. No movement or light can be detected. So at any moment an inspector or
boss can come in and watch the building, taking note of every detail, and doing as he pleases with
the information he comes

Foucault And The Panopticon
A Panopticon is a structure designed to where subjects can be observed from a central viewpoint,
but cannot view each other. Why can the Central tower supervise the inmates while the inmates
cannot supervise others? Simply because the central tower has the power, for the inmates to be able
to observe each other in the same manner would either be inconsequential, or unjust. Foucault says
that knowledge and power are deeply intertwined and that both can be used to produce the other via
observation, or control. One of the issues that arise from having a society similar to the Panopticon
is that not all of those who serve as a central tower can be regarded to as virtuous.
For This week's assignment, I chose the NSA as my subject because I feel

The Panopticon Gives 'Power Of Mind Over Mind'
Prompt: Please draw on the Foucault reading to describe how the panopticon gives "power of mind
over mind." Describe an instance in which being under panoptic surveillance has lead to your own
self–discipline or self–regulation.
The Foucault reading focused primarily on the panopticon. The panopticon is a system in which one
is continuously surveillance and observed but at the same time is explicitly aware and has been
explicitly shown to be being observed/surveillanced. This sort of "all seeing watchful eye" approach
lends to what Jeremy Bentham calls a "power of mind over mind". What is meant by this is that the
panopticon acts directly on the individuals and shapes them by controlling power relations in
individuals and groups of individuals. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, prisons are routinely allowed to be toured by the public and by reporters. This can lead
to reform and changes and allows the panoptic system to be even more flexible and adaptable to
change. Personally I believe panoptic surveillance in certain contexts and in certain amounts ahas
lead to me developing my own self discipline and self regulation. I believe in general I run under the
principle of " Do What you believe is right even if no one is watching". This is in spite of the fact
that even if no one is watching me or that I am not under surveillance that I would still act as if I
was being watched and that I was under surveillance. Often times I find myself in situations in
which the fact that I've been exposed to the concept of the panopticon so much in schools (ex: hall
monitors, surveillance cameras, etc.) and in life that I feel the need to still act according to what I
would act while under observation or surveillance. Eventually my behaviors disciplined under
panoptic systems become ingrained into my own self to the point at which I regulate my own
behavior at all times in such a manner. I tend to say "excuse me" to myself whenever I burp as per
social rules and expectations. But I will still even do this when I am just by myself as opposed to

The Panopticon
What is the definition of privacy? According to Merriam–Webster, it is the quality or state of being
apart from company or observation or the freedom from unauthorized intrusion. This definition
implies that one has the ability to isolate onself or even information about onself, and is thus able to
express oneself freely and secretly. While "privacy" and what is considered "private" differs across
cultures and societal norms, the common themes remain. When an individual deems something
"private", this usually suggests that this object in particular is intrinsically special or sensitive for
him or herself. With the emergence of 21st century technologies (such as smartphones) and of public
knowledge of global government surveillance (NSA, Snowden), ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Constitution. The amendment states the "The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no
Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly
describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Advocates underscore
that the amendment clearly alludes to a right to privacy and should be further extended to digital
properties as well. In this case, digital documents would be analogous to the "papers" mentioned in
the amendment. If the NSA has the technological power to track people's communications, then it
should only be able to follow people of suspect, or "probable cause," thus preserving the privacy of
the innocent civilian. Simply put, the U.S. Constitution placed a high value on privacy with the 4th
amendment, and therefore the U.S. Government has the responsibility to uphold that declaration. By
increasing the power of government agencies such as the NSA, the country faces a greater potential
of power abuse. It is not a coincidence that the government has partnered with various phone and
internet companies. By joining with the producers of phones and websites, the government has
found a method of sustaining its own effective panopticon. Cell phones and the internet have
become a crucial part of the

Oprah Winfrey's Panopticon
Questions:
(135)1.Oprah Winfrey defines self–empowerment by creating a network of self–help gurus and
other experts in different fields through a commercial branding methodology. Oprah often defines
herself as the center of this nexus of wisdom as a cultural icon, which "creates consumable goods
out of ideas" (Gibbons, 2007, p.286). Foucault's "panopticon" ( a prison tower that watches
prisoners) provides an important allegory of centralized surveillance and monitoring apparatus in a
prison system, which can be applied to Oprah's "panoptic gaze" that controls the self–help guru
culture through capitalist branding practices: Oprah's personal Growth Summits, a series of lectures
that Winfrey offered in three cities during the summer of 2000, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Dubrofsky & Wood (2015) define the impact of Twitter as a foundation for this new phenomenon,
which presents the superficiality of self–empowerment for women: "Because what celebrities tweet
is presented as being under their control" (p.97). This type of "make over" is how women are
perceived as being empowered, yet they are still being sexually and objectively exploited for the
male gaze. This how tabloid magazines have utilized the prosumer strategy to revive the public
interest in women willingly objectifying themselves for the male.

Panopticon Essay
For Foucault (1975), a Panopticon is a building with a tower at the center from which it is possible
to see each cell in which a prisoner or schoolboy is incarcerated. The tower is positioned in a
manner that allows the guard sitting therein to view all of the prisoners within the surrounding cells
without obstruction. Visibility is a trap. Each individual is seen by the guard but cannot
communicate with them. The panopticon induces a sense of permanent visibility that ensures the
functioning of power, an environment where one cannot escape the guard's watchful eyes. It is all
the more insidious as it is a power that is unverifiable. Although the prisoner can see the tower, they
can never be certain if the guard is indeed observing them.
The Panopticon allows one to do the work of a naturalist: drawing up tables and taxonomies. It is
also a laboratory of power, in which experiments are carried out on prisoners and staff. The plague–
stricken town and the panopticon represent transformations of the disciplinary program. The first
case is an exceptional situation, where power is mobilized against an extraordinary evil. The second
is a generalized model of human functioning, a way of defining power relations in everyday life.
The Panopticon is not a dream building, but a diagram of power reduced to its ideal form. It perfects
the operations of power by increasing the number of people who can be controlled, and decreasing
the number needed to operate it. It gives power over

What Animal Are You: Panopticon
Why do we act differently when we think someone is watching? In the idea of the panopticon there
is a tower in the center that "watches" over the prisoners. This tower makes the prisoners feel like
they are being watched so they don't act out, even if there is no one in the tower actually watching
them. But there doesn't need to be anyone in the tower to watch because there is no way for the
prisoners to see so they behave no matter what. The idea of someone watching them is enough to
keep them from doing something wrong. This is the effect of the "visible and unverifiable" power
that lies in the panopticon. In "What Animal Are You?" the entirety of the story happens behind a
camera. This creates a watchman that is visible, but unverifiable. The main character knows he is
being filmed because he can see the camera, but when the footage goes live on tv he has no way of
verifying that anyone is actually watching it. Also, the footage could never air on tv, but the people
that come through the room when the camera is around will still act different. This becomes most
apparent when the son comes in and immediately runs to his dad and hugs him because he knows ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
None of these ideas are perfect, which is why there is still theft and other people acting out. There
can't be a camera that covers every square inch of a town, and there aren't enough people to keep
watch of the footage that is being recorded with those cameras. The panopticon, in theory, is a great
idea for a prison, but would it actually work? Eventually the awareness of the prisoners might wear
off because they might have gotten away with something once already when no one was actually
watching them. I think it could be an interesting experiment, but I'm not sure how plausible it is and
for how long it could really

Michel Foucault 's Theory Of Discipline And Punishment
Michel Foucault states in Discipline and Punishment that "the Panopticon is a marvelous machine
which, whatever use one may wish to put it to, produces homogeneous effects of power" (Foucault
188). Examining the evolution, physical characteristics, and psychological effects of the Panopticon
allows one to understand the mechanism by which the Panopticon produces power. Most inventions
develop through an evolutionary process while attempting to improve a situation or solve a problem.
Often, a prototype precedes a new structure or mechanism. Foucault uses the term "projects" to
describe two historical events and the social responses to resolve the problems associated with these
events. He suggests that the Panopticon developed from these two projects, the quarantine of the
plague and colonizing the lepers. Foucault describes how the Panopticon developed from a
seventeenth–century order issued to deal with the scourge of the plague. "First, a strict spatial
partitioning: the closing of the town and its outlying districts" was mandated (Foucault 181). The
town was further divided into quarters, streets, and households. A syndic who was in the charge of
an intendant supervised each family in their residence. "A considerable body of militia" and "guards
at the gate" ensured that the magistrate over the town had absolute authority (Foucault 181). "Only
the syndics, intendants, and guards moved about the streets" (Foucault 181). They monitored and
reported the

Discipline And The Panopticon
On the other hand, Bentham's Panopticon exemplified another exercise of disciplinary power,
however in the prison setting. The Panopticon was used as a correctional facility by anonymously
monitoring the behaviors of those confined within the cells. The anonymous observance produced a
"homogenous effect of power" to discourse as it was a system where the prisoners were both the
objects and subjects. ("Discipline and Punish" 202) In this context, control is exercised through
surveillance and the discourses are designed to keep the individuals in order. The modern prison
system is a discourse of punishment because "the codified power to punish becomes the disciplinary
power to observe," suggesting discipline to be a technology of power that objectifies the individuals
it affects. ("Discipline and Punish" 224) These two examples exhibit how power is exercised
through discourse, language, and understanding, and how the influential people who command the
set of discursive principles use their knowledge to exercise power. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Through the multiplicity of discourses, society is able to control larger populations. Discursive
fields such as civil law, religion, and media, operating simultaneously, exert power over individuals
and the shared knowledge by each discourse obliges individuals, subjecting them to conform to its
ways. The mobilization and deployment of a multiplicity of discourses result in an evermore
containing and controlling society. Similar to the physically isolated cell of the Panopticon,
individuals in everyday society also face homogeneous pressures to constantly monitor, alter, and
correct their behavior. Individuals are forced to discipline themselves and regulate their own
conscious and unconscious in case of the off chance of being seen by

Panopticon Analysis
Target through the View of Panopticism In the article The Panopticon in Encyclopedia of Criminal
Justice Ethics, Karol M. Lucken described "Panopticon" the idea of Jeremy Bentham, father of
"Panopticism", a social–philosopher as "a power of mind". Farther than schools, workplaces,
poorhouses, and hospitals which kinds of social institutions Bentham believed his Panopticon could
be used for, as society has progressed, the Panopticism has applied into other institutions such as
online social networking service, or Retail Corporation. Indeed, based on the Panopticon, Target, a
retail corporation is consolidating their power under surveillance by the cover of coupon advertising.
In the article How Target Figured Out A Teen Girl Was Pregnant Before ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In his essay, Karol M. Lucken stated, "In effect, the tower was emblematic of power and
surveillance that was simultaneously visible and unverifiable." It is a tall observation tower in the
center of a circular building, and the outer wall is made up of cells which would hold inmates who
always to be visible, but the guards in the tower are not distinguishable, thus creating more effective
surveillance. The idea of Panopticon was applying by Target which could control the people's
pursuit of reward and utility. Actually, reward and utility led people accidentally follow
utilitarianism, and people don't know that they are under control of other. An example, my mother
became a faithful adherent of Target where she buys supplies and never give a chance to another
retail because Target's coupons always delivered on time. Exactly, you give Target the power to
know your likes, who you are, where you are, items with you at every stage, and even what you
need. Become a member, or using credit card, you have provided Target all the information which
needed to figure out your life. Unfortunately, customers are prisoners and they locked themselves in
the cells which are their information and would be readily distinguishable and visible to Target
invisible covered behind the coupons. Analyzing the catalog items which you bought, Target uses
that towards luring you into the coupons, and it slowly control

Foucault And Panopticon
Foucault and Freud on social control and discipline Foucault and Freud have different views on
what is needed to keep a civilization from going extinct. For Foucault, the presence of a panopticon
in a society will ensure discipline and the power needed for a civilization to continue. On the other
hand, Freud believes a panopticon will help build a strong civilization, but later will be its own
destruction. Although Foucault and Freud differ in their views of what the effect the panopticon will
bring, both agree that the panopticon is needed in order to enforce social control and discipline in a
civilization.
Though Foucault and Freud vary in their views on what is needed in a civilization, they agree a
Panopticon is needed to enforce social ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In many communities, one has to act normal in order to fit in the crowd, or else they will be
classified as abnormal and excluded from the community. As Foucault states, "On the one hand, the
lepers are treated as plague victims; the tactics of individualizing disciplines are imposed on the
excluded; and, on the other hand, the universality of disciplinary controls makes it possible to brand
the 'leper' and to bring into play against him the dualistic mechanisms of exclusion" (Foucault,
1995). The Panopticon has branded the 'leper' as the plague causing the people around this person to
exclude this person from society. The goal of the Panopticon is to keep the community pure without
any person there to pollute and push back their progress. Social control and discipline is taken in
action in this situation, the Panopticon enforces people to view this person as abnormal and not fit to
be part of this society. As Foucault states, "So it is not necessary to use force to constrain the convict
to good behaviour, the madman to calm, the worker to work, the schoolboy to application, the
patient to the observation of the regulations. All that was needed was that the separations should be
clear and the openings well arranged" (Foucault, 1995). If the Panopticon was used correctly, the
community will not go against it which will make discipline to be less of a punishment and more

The Power Of The Panopticon
In this passage, power implies that it's the very essence of human nature. Something that sway's us
like tree's to the wind. Most of us don't even notice it since it's so ingrained in our individuality. As
things go most of the power go to the few, since Americans have set it in stone decades back. I can
see most of this changing with the new revolutionary ideas that are coming to light with the newer
generations. But as it states with the Panopticon, it's more of a state of mind. That watchful eye in
the sky that can take your freedom away by breaking a law or two. Consequence's that have been
placed in motion to keep its flock of sheep in its pen. There are upsides to the point of the
Panopticon, gives anyone with any ill will that has a

The Panopticon in My Life Essay
Panopticon The Panopticon in My Life
Principles of the Panopticon can appear just about everywhere in our everyday life. The Panopticon
itself is a simple system of centralized visualization. The basis of the original Panopticon was a
circular prison system with a tower sitting in the middle that had a full, unobstructed view of all the
prison cells. I can apply this idea to many situations in my life varying from computer use to my
college classrooms. An instance, which stands out the most in my mind as being a panoptic
environment, is my experiences in gaming casinos.
The basic system of just about every casino is that of the tables (including Roulette, Blackjack and
Craps) filling the center of the room with computerized ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The difference here is the layout is meant for the casino management to have full view of the players
at the tables. Roulette, Blackjack and Craps tables are placed in a circular pattern with an area in the
middle roped off for the casino personnel only. Within this area called the pit, stand the pit bosses.
Their prime job is to keep an eye on all the tables and regulate them. As a player you barely notice
there invading eyes because you are distracted by your game. They make sure there is no foul play
on your end such as making sure you pay the right amount for chips, play correctly, and act in a civil
manner. They not only keep a close eye on you but they make sure the dealer gives you correct
payouts, makes correct change and that the cards, dice or wheel is played properly.
Another small panoptic system is the actual tables themselves. Each table, no matter which game, is
arranged in a central way that the dealer is in the middle and the players surround him. All the
players focus on the dealer and are reliant on his every move. The dealer, representing the house, has
the ultimate control of the situation. Although he does not know the outcome, the chances of you
losing are always higher. This gives the casino their edge. You completely depend on their outcome
even though you do have a decision in how you play.
Lastly, the use of surveillance cameras is a prime panoptic example. Surveillance has to be the most
prominent use of a

The Theory Of The Panopticon
In this day and age, social media has become the norm, from the news to any person with access to
the internet, have become reliant to fast a paced platform. Michel Foucault, 20th century French
philosopher and social theorist, fully developed the theory of the panopticon, created by English
philosopher and social theorist Jeremy Bentham in the late 18th century. The panopticon, described
by Bentham, is a prison structure where there are three walls constructed around the prisoner leaving
an empty space where a fourth wall would normally be. The entire structure is usually in a circle, the
prisoner knows that there are inmates to their left and right, but there is no way for them to
communicate with one another. In the middle of the panopticon, there is a clearing where the watch
tower stands. This is where the warden can observe the inmates, but there no way the inmates know
when the warden is in the tower or not. The inmate does not know when they are or not being
observed, for the entrance to the tower is underground. This makes the inmate to behave a different
manner at all times because they do not know when they are being observed. Social media, has
become in a way, a new panoptical platform where not only does the observed continue to be
observed but also become the observer. There have been many discussions as to whether we can
escape the panopticon through social media. We cannot escape the panopticon because there will
always be someone observing us weather we put

Jeremy Bentham's Theory Of The Panopticon
In February of 2004, an advanced prison system was born for all the world to take part of. The
prison, which was designed for a younger generation, was built to monitor all inmates at all hours of
the day, convert what was once a manual process to automatic, and to collect personal information
from each individual. The lockup is host to billions of inmates, each having their own cell. One
might assume this prison is a building, but it is more a state of mind. Located in the public's view,
where all can see it each and every day, anyone is able to join and only takes a click of a mouse.
This prison is Facebook. Michel Foucault, a French philosopher, has brought to attention insights
that help clarify how power and discipline work together to create surveillance for a large group.
Foucault passed away before the birth of the internet, but has provided society with knowledge on
how surveillance is applicable to the online world. In the essay Panopticism, Foucault expands on
Jeremy Bentham's theory of the panopticon. Proposed by Bentham in the mid–19th century, the
panopticon is a prison which was used to observe inmates constantly (Torres, 2017). The prison has
a tower in the middle, where each inmate can be seen from the tower by a guard (Foucault, 1975,
200). Therefore, the prisoners always think they are being watched as they cannot see who is in the
tower, or if there even is anyone in the tower watching. Foucault describes this in his essay as being
"the major effects of

Structure And Principles Of The Panopticon
The Panopticon
In the previous chapters, it talks about the mechanisms of discipline and the meaning of the notion
of docile bodies. However, in this chapter, it discusses the architectural device in which according to
Foucault is the best mean to apply the mechanics of discipline and to make the body docile. In
addition, this chapter discusses also the power relations involved in the human body as well as to
make the society more discipline, its effects and principles.
Structure and Principles of Panopticon
Foucault, uses the architectural device of Jeremy Bentham, the Panopticon, as the best means to
apply the surveillance power without discontinuity through humane form and to apply the
mechanics of discipline which makes the body docile. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This means that Panopticon does not serve or help only the prisoners to be formed but also the
workers, students, and others. Thus, Panopticon can be used in many ways to achieve different
goals. Hence, everyone must be in partitioned so that the application of power may function
successfully, to make individual body docile. Thus, one of the advantage of this Panopticon structure
is that the power is being exercise at a lesser expense. This statement means that, it only need one
person to exercise power but the objects of the exercise of power are many. Thus, everyone is being
seen by

The Circle: A Panopticon
The Circle is a Panopticon
According to Dalai Lama, a lack of transparency results in distrust and a deep sense of insecurity.
The novel The Circle by Dave Eggers displays an example of full transparency with the company
the Circle. A panopticon is full transparency without the other person knowing. The company,
Circle, is a panopticon because the Circle is a transparent company, the Circlers work are taking
over their lives like a prisoner, and the Circle uses oppressive behavior towards the Circlers.
The Circle is the most innovative company that inspires the workers believe in transparency. Alike
the panopticon, which is used to monitor prisoners, the Circle has developed modern technologies
used to monitor anything in the world. One of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mae, a Circler, is like a prisoner being oppressed by the Circle without her knowing. The panopticon
is a building made for prisoners and how the Circle exercises their authority or power in an unjust
manner towards the Circlers. "Bentham didn't want the panopticon to be a tool for oppression, and
in fact its failure eventually led him to develop a type of anti–panopticon later in life – where a
minister sits in an exposed room and is surrounded by members of the public who listen and ask
questions," stated Thomas (What does the panopticon mean). Following the Circle's story, what
Thomas stated in his article is very similar to the book The Circle. The Circle was created for good
morals but became corrupt and later on need to possibility shut it down due to usage of oppressive
behaviors. The Circle's panopticon operating style is shown as Mae being oppressed by Denise and
Josiah to actively using the Circle's social media. This is alike the panopticon prisoners where they
know they are being watched so they are conditioned to be on their very best behavior. "The
sometimes' is interesting to me. Or concerning, I should say. Because I think you're not finding that
'sometime' frequently enough," stated Josiah (Eggers, 190). As Mae's superior, Josiah is
interrogating her to shape her into what the Circle wants her to be which is oppressive behavior.
From the outside, the panopticon and the Circle may seem very useful but no one knows what goes
on internally: the use of

Panopticon Definition
This study discusses the surveillance conducted by Five Eyes (FVEY) international intelligence
alliance, and their monitoring of private and commercial communications including other data
traffic. I will argue in this study the reasons for which intelligence agencies utilize the Panopticon
concept of surveillance as a mechanism of power. The Panopticon structure and systematic
monitoring is being used to organize society and support government power through positive
analysis. Social institutions collection of data, from schools, hospitals, governments and
corporations are used for power and control of day to day life. The omniscient surveillance
internalizes a gaze on society that causes individual subjects to watch themselves. This surveillance
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Local surveillances have been linked with global audiences. Panopticon surveillance helps gather
knowledge through its creation of human agents who are compliant to the dictates of authority. The
ideas of network surveillance open the way for further exploration of the individuals as objects of
knowledge. Source 4 (___/3 marks)
Hope, Andrew. 2016. "Biopower and school surveillance technologies 2.0". British Journal of
Sociology of Education 37(7). 885–904. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2014.1001060
This article focuses on the commoditization of surveillance, particularly, the surveillance at schools
and their accumulation of biometric measurements of students. This papers analysis explores how
different surveillance devices can objectify bodies through disciplinary techniques and the bio
political management of populations. This paper argues that there is a normalization of intrusive
surveillance occurring in modern society.
Source 5 (___/3 marks)
Lyon, David. 2015. "Surveillance after Snowden". European Journal of Communication 31(3). 366–
367. doi:

Panopticon Research Paper
How does the panopticon function to create self–disciplining and docile subjects? Note one way in
which this social design works to create self–policing subjects and one instance in which it fails. The
system is designed to over see the many and be supervised by the few. Originally designed for
prisons the concept was socially adopted and used often. Schools use the system of panopticon
function to over see the many children, just like a hospital, factories and prisons which all function
and look smiler. Each institute classify the role of worker, pupils, prisoners and patients making
them all conform to a norm. Each has a system set in place that subjects understand the rules of the
institute and must conform to them which creates self policing. In school like other institute their is
a dress code which dictated what I could not wear. Based on what I could not wear I found my self
making purchase for garments based on the rules of the institute. For example shoulders had to be
cover in school which reflected the dictatorship of my garment purchase of no spaghetti strapped
items. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
W.I. Thomas, however, very famously stated,
"Whatever is perceived as real is real in its consequences." Explain the individualistic nature of this
statement in light of a community based theory. If exposure dose not occur then knowledge is not
gained. A child is born into the world blank leaving it to perceive what is real as what is presented.
The community is responsible for what the child understands as reality. Recently a childhood book
"The Giver" has been turned into a motion picture which shows the consequence results of
perception as real from panopticon. When present what is real and only shown what is real the
consequences of controls established thru panopticon function becomes over sensitive and chaos.

What Is FoucaultÂ´s Panopticon?
Prisons were created with the intention of correcting and reforming those who have committed
wrongful acts but this article implies that the prison system is not living up to its original purpose.
Foucault was a big believer in understanding the intent behind an individual's criminal acts. He was
also in favour of training individuals to become disciplined people by manipulating the
circumstances around them. A good example of this would be his opinion on the panopticon. He
believed that a panopticon would benefit the people inside prisons because it would teach them
discipline. A person is less likely to act up if one is under the impression that they are under constant
surveillance. Foucault believes that inducing conformity among prisoners, measuring each
individual's performance, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
While Foucault does make strong and compelling points that would benefit the system, his theory
fails to acknowledge some crucial aspects. One of them being that some individuals cannot have
their behaviour modified as easily as one would expect because criminals do not typically conform
to society's expectations and demands. Plus, many criminals are under the impression that if they are
caught once, they will not be caught again, so the idea of being monitored would most likely not
stay with them once they leave prison, even if the panopticon was enforced on them. And finally,
Foucault does not realize that individuals who are sentenced to prison for committing wrongful acts
do not have many benefits once their sentence has ended and because of it, they lack power, which
cause a lot of people to resort to committing more crimes when they are out because they have no
other option. They could be disciplined and they truly could have changed but because the
circumstances are not the best for them when they leave confinement, they most likely will forgo the
discipline they have been

Panopticon Of Technology

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Patty Buckley

More from Patty Buckley (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Panopticon Of Technology