Agile methods have evolved over several decades through iterative improvements. The document discusses the history and key principles of various agile frameworks including Scrum, DSDM, Crystal, FDD, Lean, XP, and ASD. It evaluates the different approaches based on criteria like project size, team size, development style, required technology environment, and business culture fit.

1. DO MORE w w w . r i s e . c o m . b r

2. An Overview about Agile Methods Advisor: Silvio Romero de Lemos Meira Co-Advisor: Eduardo Santana de Almeida Speaker: Ivonei Freitas da Silva 07/25/09

6. Discussing pre-launch (simulated) training.... http://www.chessin.com/paul/pmerc.html

16. Agile – Why? ( http://www.standishgroup.com/ )

17. Agile – Why? ( http://www.standishgroup.com/ ) 51% 34% 15% Com problemas sucesso falham

18. Agile – Why? (Beck & Fowler, 2001) Software development isn’t previsible Software development needs constantly making little corrections

19. Agile – Why?

23. The Satir Model (Satir, 1991) (Smith, 2009)

27. Agile – Framework (Qumer & Henderson-Sellers, 2008)

30. Agile Methods – Scrum ( http://www.controlchaos.com/about/ )

32. Agile Methods – DSDM DSDM Process (Highsmith, 2002) (www.dsdm.org) Feasibility Study Functional Model Iteration (x3) Agree Plan Create Functional Prototype Review Prototype Identify Functional Prototype Design & Build Iteration (x3) Identify Design Prototypes Agree Plan Create Design Prototype Review Design Prototype Implementation Implement Train Users User Approval & Guidelines Review Business Business Study Pre-project Post-project

36. Agile Methods – Crystal Family (http://alistair.cockburn.us/crystal )

40. Agile Methods – FDD (http://www.featuredrivendevelopment.com/ )

41. Agile Methods – FDD (http://www.featuredrivendevelopment.com/ )

42. Agile Methods – FDD (http://www.featuredrivendevelopment.com/ )

47. Agile Methods - XP

50. Agile Methods - ASD (Highsmith, 2002)

52. Agile Methods – Evaluation (Qumer & Henderson-Sellers, 2007) Criteria XP Scrum FDD ASD DSDM Crystal Scope Project size Small, medium Small, medium, and scalable for large Small, medium, and large (business projects/applications) Large and Complex projects Small and large projects (Business Applications) Small and medium Team size <10 <10 and multiple teams * No limit – scalable from small to large teams Not mentioned Minimum 2 and Maximum 6 (Multiple teams) Single team in crystal clear with maximum 6 people in a team. Multiple teams with maximum 40 persons in orange and 80 persons in red methodology Development style Iterative, rapid Iterative, rapid Iterative design and construction Iterative and rapid development – distributed development Iterative, rapid development and cooperative Iterative and rapid development

53. Agile Methods – Evaluation (Qumer & Henderson-Sellers, 2007) Criteria XP Scrum FDD ASD DSDM Crystal Code style Clean and simple Not specified Not specified Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned Technology environment Quick feedback required Not specified Not specified Not mentioned Not mentioned Not mentioned Physical environment Co-located teams and distributed teams (limited-interaction) Not specified Not specified Co-located and distributed teams Not mentioned Co-located team – no support for distributed development Business culture Collaborative and cooperative Not specified Not specified Not specified Collaborative and cooperative Not mentioned Abstraction mechanism Object-oriented Object-oriented Object-oriented Object-oriented/Component-oriented Object-oriented/Component-oriented Object-oriented

54. Agile Methods – Evaluation (Qumer & Henderson-Sellers, 2007)

55. Agile Methods – Evaluation (Qumer & Henderson-Sellers, 2007)

59. Agile – Case,Tools (large distributed agile team) (Cannizzo et al., 2008)