Seminar Group Presentation re Mrs Smith and her Ancestors

1. Mass migration versus elite
dominance in the Anglo-
Saxon settlement of Britain

2. Questions to be considered:
“When I was at school I am sure we were

taught that England was inhabited by
Angles, Saxons and Jutes who crossed en
masse from Germany after the Romans
abandoned Britain, and drove the Britons into
the far west.?”
And isn‟t that why all our place-names are

composed in English - except those which
come from languages which arrived later with
the Vikings or Normans?

3. There is much controversy between historians

over the two theories of Anglo-Saxon
settlement.
Before 1980s, historical and archaeological

evidence interpreted in favour of mass
migration but more recent interpretations show
a preference to the model of elite dominance.

4. Archaeology can be used to support either mass migration

or elite dominance.
Higham argues that archaeological evidence, such as

building types and material culture, demonstrates a small
migration of high status people.
However, others argue that archaeology, especially

material culture, cannot be used to confirm that the
settlement was high-status.
Difficulties in inferring ethnicity from burial

record.

5. Weale et al., examined Y (male) chromosomes. Weale

claimed that his evidence showed a mass migratory event
and argued that approximately half of the population in
England derives from the Anglo-Saxon gene pool.
Oppenheimer et al. provide evidence to suggest that the

settlement was not the result of mass migration as only 5-
15% of the modern gene pool show links to the Anglo-
Saxons.
Issues affect the usefulness of genetic anthropology.


6. Thomas et al., suggest a theory of genetic

anthropology which indicates that the settlement
was one of elite dominance.
They suggest that it is unlikely that there was a

mass migration due to the relatively large size of
the population immediately after the Roman
occupation. Status of migrants versus status of
Britons.

7. Gelling proposes that language and place-names changes

provide the greatest support for mass migration, but not
extermination of the British population.
The main Brittonic borrowings are topographical suggests

same status of migrants and native Britons.
However, recently some scholars have disputed the theory

that language replacement is proof of mass migration.
Problems involved in linguistics and place-name studies.


8. Controversy between the two opposing models of Anglo-Saxon

settlement – different interpretations.
The study of genetics, archaeology and place-names provide

evidence which supports both elite dominance and mass
migration.
Contradictory argument

Popularity of different interpretations –filtered down through

education = may explain why Mrs. Smith had particular beliefs
about her ancestors.

9. In relation to Mrs. Smith and her ancestors...
The study of place-names provides the strongest evidence for the theory of

mass migration but as Gelling suggests, this does not mean that the migration
also involved extermination of the Celts = it is possible for Mrs. Smith to be a
distant descendant from the remains found in her garden. Not population
extermination even if mass migration occurred.
The study of genetics also provides a plausible answer as to why Mrs. Smith is

related to the remains in her garden. Mass migration or elite dominance =
evidence suggests northern Europeans all share similar genetics.
Archaeology


10. C. Hills. Origins of the English (London, 2003).

„Y-Chromosome Evidence for Anglo Saxon Mass

Migration‟, Michael Weale and others; (Molecular Biology and
Evolution 19(7) (2002) 1008-1021
„Myths of British Ancestry‟, Stephen Oppenheimer; Prospect

Magazine Issue 127 October 2006
„Evidence for an Apartheid-like Structure in early Anglo-Saxon

England‟, Mark Thomas ad others; Proceedings of the Royal
Society doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3627 (2006)