- The document summarizes several presentations from a conference on applying behavioral science.
- One speaker discussed brain imaging research showing brain activity is more predictive of behavior than self-reported intentions. Experiments found people over-reported willingness to buy items or under-reported willingness to eat unpleasant foods.
- Another talk discussed the "pratfall effect" - people view competent individuals as more competent after a minor mistake, but view average individuals as less competent after a similar mistake.
A review of the behavioral economics concept of the paradox of choice where some choice is good, but too much choice creates paralysis and dissatisfaction
U06A1 (Methods and Findings)
U06A1 (Methods and Findings)
Student:
Institution:
Professor:
Date of Submission:
Introduction
In this assignment, I was able to get a real chance to be in the actual field making first hand observations. It was such an interesting activity to move around and watch natural behaviour in the field. During this time, my main objectives involved making observations of random people in their natural environment and how they behaved, how frequent they were into social media. Their frequency to social media usage was judged by how they were using their gadgets such as tablets and cell phones. Another objective involved getting close enough to hear their conversations and capture their attitude on some aspects. All this was done without their knowledge so as to ensure they had their natural behaviour free from influence.
Another phase of my activity involved asking some questions about their opinions on some issues such as social media usage. These questions were designed in such a way that a response/behaviour would follow soon enough. The reason for these mechanism was to compare their attitudes towards something and how they actually behaved in relation to their attitudes. Most of my questions were social media related so as to ensure I remained relevant to my research and social psychology.
The activity involved observation of ten random subjects and how they interacted with one another, how they behaved as a result of their peer surrounding since the experiment was conducted in a public setting. The observation occurred on two phases. Each phase taking approximately 20-30mins such that I had approximately two minutes for each person. The second phase was the most interesting since this is where I was asking the questions and observing whether the persons would behave in accord to their opinions and attitude. It should be noticed that, at times I would make the observation then pose the question about what I had observed just to see if their actions would match their opinions.
Their entire time in the field was really interesting and mind opening.
Ethical obligations and challenges
Every research will always have some challenges associated with it. The challenges are even more when the subjects under study are humans. This is because we humans have rights and freedoms which ought to be respected and upheld.
My study had several challenges. However, such challenges were tackled professionally such that my results were not biased and no violations of whatsoever kind were made. My first challenge was to target selection. With so many people in a public setting, it is difficult to select a fair sample that would be representative enough. In addition to this, gender and age repre ...
A review of the behavioral economics concept of the paradox of choice where some choice is good, but too much choice creates paralysis and dissatisfaction
U06A1 (Methods and Findings)
U06A1 (Methods and Findings)
Student:
Institution:
Professor:
Date of Submission:
Introduction
In this assignment, I was able to get a real chance to be in the actual field making first hand observations. It was such an interesting activity to move around and watch natural behaviour in the field. During this time, my main objectives involved making observations of random people in their natural environment and how they behaved, how frequent they were into social media. Their frequency to social media usage was judged by how they were using their gadgets such as tablets and cell phones. Another objective involved getting close enough to hear their conversations and capture their attitude on some aspects. All this was done without their knowledge so as to ensure they had their natural behaviour free from influence.
Another phase of my activity involved asking some questions about their opinions on some issues such as social media usage. These questions were designed in such a way that a response/behaviour would follow soon enough. The reason for these mechanism was to compare their attitudes towards something and how they actually behaved in relation to their attitudes. Most of my questions were social media related so as to ensure I remained relevant to my research and social psychology.
The activity involved observation of ten random subjects and how they interacted with one another, how they behaved as a result of their peer surrounding since the experiment was conducted in a public setting. The observation occurred on two phases. Each phase taking approximately 20-30mins such that I had approximately two minutes for each person. The second phase was the most interesting since this is where I was asking the questions and observing whether the persons would behave in accord to their opinions and attitude. It should be noticed that, at times I would make the observation then pose the question about what I had observed just to see if their actions would match their opinions.
Their entire time in the field was really interesting and mind opening.
Ethical obligations and challenges
Every research will always have some challenges associated with it. The challenges are even more when the subjects under study are humans. This is because we humans have rights and freedoms which ought to be respected and upheld.
My study had several challenges. However, such challenges were tackled professionally such that my results were not biased and no violations of whatsoever kind were made. My first challenge was to target selection. With so many people in a public setting, it is difficult to select a fair sample that would be representative enough. In addition to this, gender and age repre ...
Accompanying deck for my 30-minute presentation on survey. Survey is quite a lengthy topic so had to focus on the practicalities of choosing a survey and the rules of thumb around developing questions and the importance of sampling. There is a also a study of the Gallup Poll during the 1948 elections.
WHERE TO START CHP. 2LEARNING OBJECTIVES· Discuss how a hypo.docxphilipnelson29183
WHERE TO START CHP. 2
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
· Discuss how a hypothesis differs from a prediction.
· Describe the different sources of ideas for research, including common sense, observation, theories, past research, and practical problems.
· Identify the two functions of a theory.
· Summarize the fundamentals of conducting library research in psychology, including the use of PsycINFO.
· Summarize the information included in the abstract, introduction, method, results, and discussion sections of research articles.
Page 21THE MOTIVATION TO CONDUCT SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH DERIVES FROM A NATURAL CURIOSITY ABOUT THE WORLD. Most people have their first experience with research when their curiosity leads them to ask, “I wonder what would happen if …” or “I wonder why …,” followed by an attempt to answer the question. What are the sources of inspiration for such questions? How do you find out about other people's ideas and past research? In this chapter, we will explore some sources of scientific ideas. We will also consider the nature of research reports published in professional journals.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS, HYPOTHESES, AND PREDICTIONS
The result of curiosity is a question. Researchers use research questions to identify and describe the broad topic that they are investigating, and then conduct research in order to answer their research questions. A good research question identifies the topic of inquiry specifically enough so that hypotheses and predictions can be made. A hypothesis is also a question; it makes a statement about something that may be true. Hypotheses are more specific versions of research questions; they are directly testable whereas a research question may not be. Thus, a hypothesis is a tentative idea or question that is waiting for evidence to support or refute it. Once a hypothesis is proposed, data must be gathered and evaluated in terms of whether the evidence is consistent or inconsistent with the hypothesis. Researchers also make specific predictions concerning the outcome of research. Where a research question is broad and a hypothesis is more specific, a prediction is a guess at the outcome of a hypothesis. If a prediction is confirmed by the results of the study, the hypothesis is supported. If the prediction is not confirmed, the researcher will either reject the hypothesis or conduct further research using different methods to study the hypothesis. It is important to note that when the results of a study confirm a prediction, the hypothesis is only supported, not proven. Researchers study the same hypothesis using a variety of methods, and each time this hypothesis is supported by a research study, we become more confident that the hypothesis is correct.
Figure 2.1 shows the relationships among research questions, hypotheses, and predictions graphically. As an example, consider Cramer, Mayer, and Ryan (2007). They had general questions about college students’ use of cell phones while driving: “Are there differences among gro.
Online help with essay writing for everybody at EssayHelp.io. Help with essay writing - College Homework Help and Online Tutoring.. How Online Essay Writing services boost your Grades | Write Assignment. How to Get Essay Help Online - Women Daily Magazine. No.1 Essay Writing Helper in Australia By the Experts. Essay Writing Help | Essay Writers | My Online Assignment Help. Getting Essay Help. Essay Writing Help for Students by Experts. 24+ Helpful Essay Writing Websites Most Popular - Aress. Top Quality Essay Assignment Help Online Essay Writing Help. Buy Online Essays, Need Help Writing An Essay, Essay Custom. Essay writing help online - College Homework Help and Online Tutoring.. Essay Writing Help Online, Assignment Help Online, Write An Essay, Es…. Free Essay Writing Help Online - Genius Updates. 7 Critical Tips for When You Buy an Essay Online - Attention Trust. Simple Guide to Help You Write an Essay by BreeAndrea - Issuu. Custom Essay Writing Help Online | Essay writing help, Essay writing .... Help with writing an essay - College Homework Help and Online Tutoring.. Essay writing help guideline for students seeking success at school.. College essay help online | Order Custom Essays at littlechums.com.. Get help in your essay writing and other assignments from the experts .... Essay Writing Help, English Essay Writing Assignment Help, Write an E…. Writing help online. Online essay writing tutoring. essay help online - Paperown.com. Business Essay Help Online - YouTube. Write Essay Free Online / How to Write a Remarkable Essay Infographic .... Essay Writing Help By UK Professional. Online Essay Writing Services, Professional Online Essay Writing Help. Online Writing Help [Video] | Essay writing, Writing services, Essay .... Essay help site! Essay help siteedu. Why should you get online essay writing service help. 10 Tips to Write an Essay and Actually Enjoy It. Free essay writing help, Essay Writing Help for Students by Experts. Step-By-Step Guide to Essay Writing - ESL Buzz. Online College Essay Help Essay Online Help
A brief information about the SCOP protein database used in bioinformatics.
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive and authoritative resource for the structural and evolutionary relationships of proteins. It provides a detailed and curated classification of protein structures, grouping them into families, superfamilies, and folds based on their structural and sequence similarities.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
2. Don’t Ask the Person, Ask the Brain 3
Bias of the Month 4
Why Are You Really Giving To Charity? 5
Therapeutic Properties of Internet Cats 6
Is It Your Fault You Are Broke? 7
Real Life Nudge of the Month 8
Upcoming Events 8
CONTENTS
3. Our keynote speaker Professor Colin Camerer, who has spent the year at the University of Oxford on sabbatical from his usual
post at Caltech, opened our day at the seaside by discussing his recent brain imaging research. Often, what people say they’re
going to do – from quitting smoking to buying certain products – doesn’t match what they actually do, and Camerer explored
several examples where brain activity was more predictive of a person’s behaviour than what they said.
DON’T ASK THE PERSON, ASK THE BRAIN
In a series of experiments, participants’ behaviour and brain activity was compared
during real and hypothetical tasks. These ranged from looking at items to potentially buy
(Kang, Rangel, Camus & Camerer, 2011), to placing bids to avoid eating questionable
things like fried tarantulas or pigs’ feet (Kang & Camerer, 2013). In the hypothetical
condition, participants were asked how much they would buy these items for or how
much they would pay to not eat these things, and while they were asked to be honest
and imagine this was a real purchase decision, they knew they would not have to act on
their choices. However, in the real condition, participants were told that one of their
choices would be selected at random and they would have to act upon it, whether by
purchasing the item if they had indicated they would like to or eating a tarantula if they
hadn’t bid enough not to. Behavioural data shows people over-report how much they
would pay for items and underreport how much they would pay to avoid eating
distasteful food, and measurements from fMRI revealed very different patterns of
activation during the two tasks: brain activity was much greater during real decisions,
including frontal areas like the anterior cingulate cortex, which is involved in executive
function. This shows we can ask the brain to discover how ‘serious’ a person is when
asking certain questions.
Another strand of research looking at people’s reported response to messaging around applying sunscreen or quitting smoking
found similar effects: brain activity was more predictive of the effectiveness of the message than what people said they found
most powerful. In particular, increased activity in motor regions of the brain, when people imagined using sunscreen, was more
effective in getting people to actually use it than rational arguments to do so. This has important implications for market research,
which often relies exclusively on self-reports to draw conclusions: if people answer hypothetically, and don’t have access to the
parts of the brain that determine their behaviour in real situations, their answers may not be very reliable at all.
If you missed Nudgestock (or just want to relive it), you can watch all of the talks here.
Kang, M.J., Rangel, A., Camus, M., & Camerer, C.F. (2011). Hypothetical and Real Choice Differentially Activate Common Valuation Areas. The Journal of Neuroscience,
1(2), 461-468.
4. BIAS OF THE MONTH
The Pratfall Effect
Many of us strive for perfection, to prove our competency to ourselves and signal it to others, but according to the pratfall
effect our quest for perfectionism may be doing more harm than good. The aptly named pratfall effect is our tendency to view
someone we think of as competent/attractive as relatively more competent or attractive after they have made a mistake.
Conversely, if we perceived that individual as only averagely competent/attractive before they made a mistake, we would
generally consider them less likeable and competent afterwards.
The pratfall effect was first studied in 1966, in an experiment where male students were asked to listen to a contestant on a
quiz show. The tapes consisted of an interview with very difficult questions. Some participants heard a highly competent
contestant who got 92% of the questions correct and also had a very impressive C.V., while the other participants heard a
mediocre contest who only got 32% of the questions right and had a very average C.V. Unsurprisingly, the competent
contestant was rated as significantly more competent and likable than the mediocre participant.
Where it gets interesting is what happened after a “pratfall” or blunder was introduced into
the study. After half of the participants had heard the interview and read the C.V. they
then overheard the contestant say, “Oh no, I spilled my coffee on myself!”
Results found that those who heard the competent contestant make a blunder rated him
as significantly more competent and likable than the other half of participants, who were
not exposed to the pratfall. On the other hand, those who heard the mediocre contestant
make the same pratfall, spilling coffee over themselves, rated them as significantly less
competent and likeable than those who had only heard him answer the quiz and had seen
his C.V. This research shows that our tendency to inflate how competent/likeable we
perceive someone to be does depend on whether we perceived them as competent
before their mistake.
.Adam Ferrier noted at Nudgestock that brands should take this on board. Instead of striving for perfection, brands could
potentially improve their likability by tactically adding in a little blunder here and there. Ferrier noted that some firms already
make use of this technique when pitching for new business: rather than delivering a perfectly polished pitch, such firms will
drop or spill something during the meeting, hoping the pratfall effect will sway things in their favour
Aronson, E., Willerman, B., & Floyd, J. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4(6), 227-228.
5. WHY ARE YOU REALLY GIVING TO CHARITY?
One of our favourite talks from Nudgestock this year was by Professor Nicola Raihani (UCL), who spoke about the evolutionary
reasons behind why people engage in the seemingly selfless act of charitable giving. Her hypothesis was that mate selection and
competition would play a role. She stated that most explanations given for pro-social behaviour are 1) helping relatives, 2)
reciprocity or 3) punishment, none of which explain appear to explain behaviours observed in charitable donations
This alternative reason of mate selection she specified as “reputation”- for men, enhancing their reputation could increase the
likelihood they would be chosen as a mate. Previous research has shown that the qualities of wealth and helpfulness are
extremely important to women when choosing a partner, whereas attractiveness and fertility are hugely important to men.
Therefore, the likelihood a man would be chosen as a potential partner increases if a female observes him helping another, e.g. by
giving to charity. Nicola and her co-author Sarah Smith hypothesised that this situation creates a competitive market for men where
they compete to be viewed as more helpful and generous in the eyes of the female. A popular fundraising website was chosen for
analysis: using 11,579 donation pages for the 2014 London Marathon, there were two conditions – attractive female pages and
unattractive female pages (women were independently rated as attractive or unattractive from their profile picture by Amazon
Mechanical Turk Workers).
The analysis revealed a very interesting competitive behaviour. On the occasions a
man made a large donation (higher than the existing page average) to an attractive
female fundraiser, it was significantly more likely that another man would also make
a large donation after seeing this. Results of all the pages analysed showed that
whether a man/woman gave a significantly high donation to an attractive/unattractive
women, men’s donations were significantly higher than before the high donation. The
only finding which had a significant difference across all conditions was when male
donors were responding to a high donation made by another man and they were
giving to the most attractive females (four times greater than any other effect size).
There were no significant findings for female competitiveness. These results give
weight to the argument that a key reason men give to charity is to signal their wealth,
health (blood donation) and helpfulness, now we know this signal becomes
increased in the presence of an attractive female.
Raihani, N. J., & Smith, S. (2015). Competitive helping in online giving. Current Biology, 25(9), 1183-1186.
6. From Grumpy Cat and Lil BUB to the lolcats and their incorrigibly bad grammar, cats seem to be all over the Internet. This
is reflected on YouTube’s over 2 million cat videos and their nearly 26 million views (as of 2014), the highest number of
views per video of any category on the site. There are also festivals to celebrate these creatures, such as the LA Feline
Film Festival. Research even suggests that people are twice as likely to post a photo or video of a cat than they are to post
a selfie. So far, so mildly interesting – but Jessica Gall Myrick at Indiana University has actually managed to get funding to
study our Internet cat-watching habits, and has subsequently had this ground-breaking research published.
THERAPEUTIC PROPERTIES OF INTERNET CATS
Spending time with animals in the form of ‘pet therapy’ has been shown to improve mood and wellbeing in a range of
settings, and has become more widespread in recent years, such as when specially-trained golden retrievers were sent to
Boston in the wake of the terrorist attack in 2013. Given the positive effects of watching cats felt by the participants in this
study, online videos of animals may have a similarly mood-lifting effect at a much lower cost, and avoiding contact with the
animals for anyone with allergies. As Myrick’s study used survey data from a fairly unrepresentative sample, further
research to directly test the effects of Internet cats needs to be done to determine whether this is the case, if anyone can
stop watching cat videos for long enough to actually carry it out.
Myrick (2015) did an online survey to establish what motivates people to seek out
cat content, and what effect, if any, this would have on the viewer’s mood.
Recruiting participants through Lil BUB’s social media, 6827 people completed the
survey; of whom, 88.4% were female and 52.5% held a bachelor’s degree or
higher. Among this sample, a higher frequency of cat content viewing was found in
those with the personality traits of shyness, agreeableness and anxiety, and,
unsurprisingly, those who indicated a greater affinity for cats. Watching cat videos
was related to mood management; participants reported a lower mood before
watching, which improved afterwards. There was also evidence to suggest it was
often a procrastination tool, producing feelings of guilt. Interestingly, Myrick
suggests that the happiness produced by these videos results in people wanting to
express their current mood, while guilt makes people want to make amends and
reverse harm done; therefore, sharing the cat videos that have brought them
pleasure with others makes people feel better about wasting time. This multiplies
the amount of cat content available online, and the cycle continues.
Myrick, J.G. (2015). Emotion regulation, procrastination, and watching cat videos online: Who watches Internet cats, why, and to what effect? Computers in Human
Behavior, 52, 168-176.
7. IS IT YOUR FAULT YOU ARE BROKE?
Managing our finances is vital to us leading a successful life; it affects everything from whether we have a roof over our
heads by ensuring when mortgage/rent day comes we still have enough in our accounts, to the type of life we will live when
we retire. Rationally we all know how important managing our money is, but you are not alone if you get to rent day and find
you have spent to much money and now don’t have enough to pay it, or reach retirement age and find that you haven't
saved enough in your pension to be able to afford to retire.
As our ability to manage our finances is so important, many have called for more financial education. A new paper from the
RSA states that, like so many of our behaviours, knowing what we should do rationally and actually doing it are very different
things. Our brains are wired in such a way that we are prone to many biases when making decisions which make us, despite
our best efforts, behave in ways that are far from optimal. This paper states that as part of financial education, people should
be taught the biases that lead to poor decision-making, so that people can recognise and overcome them. The six
behavioural hurdles to financial capability discussed in the report are outlined below:
• Cognitive overload: Having a lot on our minds can have negative impacts on our decision-making. We tend to choose the
simplest and easiest option, which isn’t always the best or cheapest.
• Empathy gaps: Our current self is very poor at predicating how our future self will feel. People tend to overbuy when food
shopping while hungry as their current self mis-predicts how hungry their future self will be.
• Optimism/Overconfidence: We generally tend to have positive yet unrealistic expectations
about the future, which can affect money management and leave us unprepared for a
change in circumstances.
• Instant gratification We are present- rather than future-focused, so are constantly looking
for instant gratification. This drives impulse-buying and can undermine saving plans.
• Harmful habits: Habits lead to unnecessary spending, as once a purchasing behaviour
becomes a habit people stop thinking about whether this purchase is still necessary.
• Social norms: We are significantly influenced by the behaviours of others and want to
do/have what others do/have. Consumption norms (e.g. iPhones) are more visible than
many important behaviours, such as saving for a pension, which is why many people choose
to purchase an iPhone over putting money in a pension.
When designing financial education and products, the RSA states that it is imperative these behavioural hurdles are kept in
mind, and we agree!
Spencer, N., Nieboer, J., & Elliot, A. (2015) Wired for Imprudence: RSA.
8. Spotted: Defaults in the bathroom at Murphy’s Brewhouse, Bangalore
We’ve all seen the fly in the urinal, but Murphy’s Brewhouse has taken a
different approach to ensuring their patrons pee on-target. Using the insight that
we’re guided by the default direction of footprints on the ground (such as
following them to bins to reduce public littering), this bathroom has two sets: “If
drunk” and “If sober”. Following these footprints, drunk people will stand a lot
closer – and hopefully be a lot more accurate!
Tweet your #NudgesInTheWild for the chance to be in next month’s O Behave!
REAL LIFE NUDGE OF THE MONTH
UPCOMING EVENTS
The European Conference on Psychology and the Behavioral Sciences 2015
Monday 6th July – Wednesday 8th July
Thistle Brighton Hotel, Brighton
Behavioural Finance: Foundations and Recent Developments
Monday 13th July, 9.00am-5.30pm
Fitch Learning, London
Behavioural Boozeonomics with the London Behavioural Economics Network
Monday 13th July, 6.30-11.00pm
The Comedy Pub, Piccadilly