This study presents a preliminary comparison of networks of international collaboration and mobility. Using affiliation data from scientific publications, we analyse the structural differences in the two networks and the role of countries. The results show that researchers collaborate internationally to a much higher degree than they become internationally mobile. The number of countries involved in the networks is three times higher in collaboration than in mobility, and the average degree demonstrates that mobility networks form tight structures with fewer links than collaboration networks. The role of countries differs between the collaboration and mobility network, predominately reflecting income level. Limitations and future research are described to further understand the dynamics of collaboration and mobility networks.
Networks of international collaboration and mobility: a comparative study.
1. Networks of international collaboration and
mobility: a comparative study
ISSI 2017, 16-20 October, Wuhan, China
Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Lili Miao, Dakota Murray, Nicolás Robinson-
García, Rodrigo Costas and Cassidy R. Sugimoto
4. Dimensions of Connectivity
• Mobility…serves to both
strengthen the
scientific capacity of
the countries and
benefit the scientific
careers of individual
researchers (OECD
2008)
ISSI Conference 2017 4
5. Dimensions of Connectivity
ISSI Conference 2017 5
…mobility has been advocated as key to increasing the efficiency
and effectiveness of research (Van Noorden, 2012: Scellato et al.
2015)
6. Immigration ban
Some political leaders
are proposing and
implementing
nationalistic policies
that restrict global
mobility
ISSI Conference 2017 6
+ North Korea
+ Venezuela
7. Science knows no border
Limiting mobility is likely to
have adverse effects on the
scientific system, which is
increasingly dependent on
international collaboration
ISSI Conference 2017 7
Sugimoto, C.R., Robinson-García, N., Murray, D. R., Yegros-Yegros, A., Costas, R. & Lariviere, V.
(2017). Scientists have most impact when they are free to move. Nature, 32(550), 29-31
8. The idea
Comparing the two dimensions of connectivity
could improve the understanding of mobility
and identify opportunities for and risks of
scientific collaboration and mobility
ISSI Conference 2017 8
9. Our Goal
To understand whether mobility provides a
novel or a duplicative lens on the network
created through scientific collaboration
ISSI Conference 2017 9
Preliminary comparative analysis of networks
and role of more than 200 countries
considering economic and scientific capacities
25. Web of Science
ISSI Conference 2017 25
2008 – 2015
First publication in 2008 – 2015
26. Disambiguation
Caron and van Eck (2014)
John Smith
ISSI Conference 2017 26
Caron, E., & Van Eck, N.J. (2014). Large scale author name disambiguation using
rule-based scoring and clustering. In Proceedings of the 19th International
Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 79-86).
29. Scientific capacity of nations
• Scientific Capacity is the
ability to use specialized
knowledge and exploit it
to conduct research
(Wagner et al 2001).
• Investment, infrastructure,
and output
• Four groups: advanced,
proficient, developing and
lagging
ISSI Conference 2017 29
39. Summary of the properties of the collaboration and
mobility networks
Collaboration Mobility
Number of nodes 212 212
Number of edges 12596 4788
Density 0.55 0.21
Average degree 118.27 44.95
Average shortest
distance
1.44 1.84
Diameter 2 4
Cluster Coefficient 0.83 0.73
Assortativity -0.19 -0.34
~ 3
+
40. A summary of the properties of the collaboration and
mobility networks
Collaboration Mobility
Number of nodes 212 212
Number of edges 12596 4788
Density 0.55 0.21
Average degree 118.27 44.95
Average shortest
distance
1.44 1.84
Diameter 2 4
Cluster Coefficient 0.83 0.73
Assortativity -0.19 -0.34
41. RESULTS (II)
Comparison of the position in closeness, betweenness and
clustering coefficient in the four groups of countries according to
their scientific and economic capacities
ISSI Conference 2017 41
42. How to interpret the following section
• For each indicator:
collaboration and
mobility
• The colours of lines
refer to the income
level: (green: high,
blue: upper-middle,
orange: low-middle
and red: low)
43. Closeness among the scientifically advanced countries
• Netherlands (8) (9): it
ranks in the eighth
position in the
collaboration network
and in the ninth
position in the mobility
network
• Lines only show
variations into the group
48. Scientifically developing countries
Legend: Legend: The colours refer to the income level: (green: high, blue: upper-middle,
orange: low-middle and red: low)
Clossenes Betweenness Clustering coefficient
49. Scientifically developing countries
Legend: Legend: The colours refer to the income level: (green: high, blue: upper-middle,
orange: low-middle and red: low)
Clossenes Betweenness Clustering coefficient
55. Moving away from the elite
To understand the global
system of science, we
need to move away from
the “elite” and towards a
comprehensive analysis of
international scientific
partnership
ISSI Conference 2017 55
56. Deviance from assumptions
• An small subset of countries such as India,
Malaysia, Turkey and Saudi Arabia builds
stronger connections in the mobility network.
• We also highlight the important role of South
Africa, Kenya and Nigeria in collaboration
network
ISSI Conference 2017 56
57. Collaboration related to mobility
• Both networks show a high level of local
clustering and a small average number of
steps between actors
ISSI Conference 2017 57
58. But not the same
• A country’s position is not always
consistent in both networks revealing
that roles of countries in terms of
capacities to be accessible to other
nodes, in transfer knowledge, or to be
cohesive with their neighbours may
differ.
ISSI Conference 2017 58
59. Scientific relationships are highly
resource-dependent
• Where estability
between networks
exists, it is mostly
associated wiht high-
income countries
ISSI Conference 2017 59
62. Discrepancy
• Some countries have high importance in one
dimension and low in the other one
dimension
• The discrepancy between two dimensions
could be an indicator of potential
opportunities for scientific collaboration and
mobility programs
ISSI Conference 2017 62
63. Many perspectives needed
ISSI Conference 2017 63
• Evaluative
frameworks of
countries must
consider a variety
of indicators
70. Networks of international collaboration and
mobility: a comparative study
ISSI 2017, 16-20 October, Wuhan, China
Thanks for your attention!
Questions?
zaida.chinchilla@csic.es