This document summarizes an analysis of the 2016 US Presidential debates and associated social media. It finds that political language has lower comprehension than other types of language. Both Clinton and Trump had very low reading levels, though Clinton's was higher. Sentiment analysis found political language to be highly uniform with little variation. Trump was more effective than Clinton at using Twitter and creating two angles of attack between social media and debates. The document recommends not relying too heavily on political speech and notes social media will continue to influence politics by enabling more dynamic strategies. It cautions that NLP should supplement but not replace human understanding.