Name CourseDateInstructor Expository Essay Outline.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•14 views
Name: Course: Date: Instructor: Expository Essay: Outline Directions: 1. Please review your Topic 3 readings and the “Planning and Getting Started” section of “The Writing Process” media piece. 2. Fill in the outline and references sections below. Use a minimum of three peer reviewed resources to support your subtopics (one resource per supporting paragraph). Make sure to use complete sentences when completing the outline. Expository Essay Topic: Essay Title: I. Introduction: (Begin with a hook sentence to capture your audience’s attention, then provide a brief background of the topic and end with your thesis statement.) a. Hook: b. Additional background information: c. Mapped Thesis statement (review Topic 3DQ1 for feedback from instructor): II. Support Supporting Point #1 (subtopic 1): ____________________ a. Topic sentence for this first sub-topic: b. Two to three paraphrased supporting details from your research with in-text citations · Supporting paraphrase 1: · Supporting paraphrase 2: Supporting Point #2 (subtopic 2): ____________________ a. Topic sentence for this second sub-topic: b. Two to three paraphrased supporting details from your research with in-text citations · Supporting paraphrase 1: · Supporting paraphrase 2: Supporting Point #3 (subtopic 3): ____________________ a. Topic sentence for this third sub-topic: b. Two to three paraphrased supporting details from your research with in-text citations · Supporting paraphrase 1: · Supporting paraphrase 2: III. Conclusion: (Paraphrase your thesis statement, summarize main points, and make final remarks.) a. Paraphrase thesis statement: b. Summarize main points: References Organize all references you will use in the essay and list them in the space below in alphabetical order based on author’s last name. Be sure the reference page is double-spaced and formatted to have hanging indents by ½ an inch, with the first line hanging and all others indented. See the GCU Style Guide for help with formatting references and citations. Within the essay, this reference page will be on its own page at the bottom of your essay. Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsUNV-104UNV-104-O505Expository Essay Outline100.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (65.00%)Satisfactory (75.00%)Good (85.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent85.0%Explains the Topic Using Researched Factual Information15.0%Does not explain the topic using researched, factual information.Outline does not appropriately use information and research to support body paragraphs.Explains the topic using somewhat vague information, and uses researched and factual information from at least two articles to support body paragraphs with in-text citations and references.Explains the topic using researched, factual information and uses at least two peer-reviewed articles with in-text citations and ...
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Touchstone publish an Argumentative Research Essay Using your out.pdf
Touchstone publish an Argumentative Research Essay Using your out.pdfNeed Help With Your Assignments Or Essays?|| Hire Us Today||Email US: Homework1078@gmail.com
course materialsTop of FormBottom of FormPersuasive Essay Peer Review Wor.docx
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Persuasive Essay: Peer Review Worksheet
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers to help them improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Submit this review as an attachment to both your instructor within the assignment bin and into your reply to your peer’s post containing the assigned draft.
Name of the Draft’s Author:
Name of the Peer Reviewer:
Summary
After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the paper. This should include the stance and the three sub-topics used to support the position within the essay. Do not place your own critique of the essay within this space.
Evaluate the Essay
After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the Persuasive Essay: Final Draft rubric below. Determine the level of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement ranges from Unsatisfactory to Excellent and are found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.). Please use the highlighting tool to score your peer within each criteria. Then use the right hand side of the rubric to include a rationale with evidence and examples for the score.
Topic 7 Rubric: Persuasive Essay: Final Draft
Criteria
1
Unsatisfactory
2
Less Than Satisfactory
3
Satisfactory
4
Good
5
Excellent
Why was this score determined for your peer’s essay? What evidence/examples do you have for this score?
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content – 70%
Objective Perspective and Position
Addresses a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify presented position relative to one’s own.
Appropriately identifies one’s own position on the topic. Vague explanation of the position is given. Little reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position completely appeals to emotion instead of reason.
Appropriately identifies one’s position on the topic. Explains the position taken in a coherent way. Sound reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position mostly appeals to emotion instead of reason.
Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Clearly explains the position taken. Sound and detailed reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position appeals mostly to reason.
Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Comprehensively explains the position taken. Specific issues related to the topic are fully presented in great detail. Position appeals to reason.
Rationale for score:
Word Count
Word count is less than half the minimum or more than double the maximum.
Body of essay is more than 100 words over or under the word count.
Body of essay is more than 50 but less than 100 words over or under the word count.
Body of essay is over or under the word count by 50 words or less.
Within the appropriate word count.
Ra ...
Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentat.docx
Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentative topic to research. This will be your topic throughout the entire course, so the activities required for this assignment will provide the foundation for your future Touchstones. The topic for an argumentative research paper must be a debatable topic, meaning that it involves conflicting viewpoints. Additionally, it cannot be a topic that is already decided or agreed upon by most of society. You will need to take a firm position on the topic and use evidence and logic to support the position. Touchstone 1.2 includes a research question, a working thesis, a detailed outline, and a reflection on this pre-writing process.
A. Topic Selection Guidelines
DIRECTIONS:
You may choose any topic you wish as long as the topic has two clear sides and is not agreed upon by most of society. Your topic should be current, appropriate for an academic context and should have a focus suitable for a 6-8 page essay.
B. Research Guidelines
DIRECTIONS:
Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Research Question and Working Thesis
Keep in mind:
The research question and working thesis are the driving force behind your research and eventual argument.
❒ Your research question should be a single sentence, framed as a question.
❒ Your working thesis should be a single focused sentence, framed as a statement that takes a clear position on the research question.
❒ Include your research question followed by your working thesis.
2. Detailed Outline
Keep in mind:
Your detailed outline provides a map of the argumentative research essay that you will write, including your key claims and the sources that support them. You may not have all your sources yet, and that is fine. The outline is a way to organize your essay and determine which areas (e.g. your sub-points) will require researched evidence as support.
❒ Headings: one for each paragraph with a brief label of the paragraph’s controlling idea(s); at least 7 body paragraphs, an introduction, and a conclusion
❒ Introduction includes your working thesis.
❒ Body paragraphs should each have their own unique title and key points.
❒ Conclusion includes notes on your final thoughts.
❒ Subheadings: two to five for each paragraph, below each heading, indicating key points that support the controlling idea
❒ Sources: one to three for each subheading, as relevant, indicating the support for the key point
❒ For each source, include the author’s name and the idea or information relevant to your argument (e.g. “Lappé on mono-cropping corn/soy and production”).
3. Reflection
❒ Have you displayed a clear understanding of the research activities?
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
C. Reflection Que.
Need help with this assignmentPreliminary research is attached w.docx
Need help with this assignment
Preliminary research is attached with sources. Also a sample is attached to give you an idea of how it should be formatted.
Evaluate a Source
ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested.
In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.
The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)
You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:
1. Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.
2. Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?
Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.
Sample Touchstone
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Source Identification
The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:
❒ Have you provided the author's name?
❒ Have you provided the source title?
❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?
2. Source Evaluation
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's credibility?
❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility?
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's usefulness?
❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness?
3. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)
2. How do you feel this ev.
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 2 INFORMATIVE ESSAYDraft due Week 5 and.docx
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 2: INFORMATIVE ESSAY
Draft due Week 5 and worth 50 points
Revision due Week 7 and worth 150 points
Have you ever needed just the facts?
At times a formal, objectively written approach is more appropriate or even critical for establishing credibility so that your
audience will listen and get informed! The key to informative writing is making the shift from personal opinion to objec-
tive facts. This assignment will provide you with the important opportunity to practice making this shift to a style that is
required in so many workplaces and throughout your academic program.
For this assignment, you will write an informative essay on the topic you have previously chosen. You will need to identify
a problem, need, or process related to your topic. Then you will inform your audience and provide supporting evidence
from a minimum of two credible sources that have been provided in the webtext. Keep in mind, you will continue to use
the standard essay format: Introduction paragraph with a thesis statement, body paragraphs that specifically support the
points in your thesis statement, and a conclusion paragraph.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their)
b. Do you sound impartial, informative/explanatory, and professional? How do you want your reader to feel?
(trust, smarter/informed)
c. Is the tone formal and factual?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does my introduction get the reader’s attention by using an intriguing statistic, quote, question, or scenario?
b. Does my introduction explain the context and state the importance of the problem/issue?
c. Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that can be debated from a different perspec-
tive?
d. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggest-
ed that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics?
b. Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have?
c. Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation?
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper.
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences.
a. Did you paraphrase or restate the thesis in a new way?
b. Did you.
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the.docx
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can't submit it until you have completed the unit’s Challenges. Once you've submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.
Touchstone 1.1: Engage with a Work of Research
ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the articles provided below and engage in a 2-3 page summary and response dialogue with the source. This will involve providing a detailed summary of the source's argument and responding to that argument with your position based on the information provided in the source.
Article Option 1: "The Recess Debate: A Disjuncture between Educational Policy and Scientific Research"Article Option 2: "Sugar in School Breakfasts: A School District's Perspective"Sample Touchstone
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Article Summary
❒ Have you communicated the source's purpose?
❒ Have you included all of the source's main points?
❒ Have you restated the source's argument in your own words?
2. Article Response
❒ Have you provided your perspective on the source's argument?
❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate why you either agree or disagree with the argument?
3. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. What ideas originally came to mind when you first read through the article? Did your initial response to the article change after reading it for a second time? (3-4 sentences)
2. How does paying attention to the way you respond to a source help you formulate your stance on a topic? (2-3 sentences)
C. Rubric
Advanced (90-100%)
Proficient (80-89%)
Acceptable (70-79%)
Needs Improvement (50-69%)
Non-Performance (0-49%)
Source Summary
Summarize the main argument of a research source.
Provides a complete and accurate summary of the article’s main purpose and argument in the writer’s own words.
Provides an accurate summary of the article’s main purpose and argument in the writer’s own words.
Provides an accurate summary, but relies too heavily on source quotations.
Provides an incomplete summary of the article’s main purpose and argument and/or relies too heavily on source quotations.
Does not provide a complete and accurate summary of the article’s main purpose and argument in the writer’s own words.
Source Response
Articulate a response to the argument presented in a research source.
Constructs a thoughtful and academically appropriate response to the source, incl ...
Create an annotated bibliography assignment using your research q
Create an annotated bibliography assignment using your research q
ENG115ASSIGNMENT2STANCEESSAYDRAFTDueWeek
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 2: STANCE ESSAY DRAFT
Due Week 7 and worth 100 points
For your next assignment, you will write a stance essay. A stance essay takes a position on a topic and argues and supports that
position with evidence. Consider your topic:
· What possible positions/arguments are there?
· What position resonates with you? (Which position do you believe is correct?)
· What are your main points?
· What are the counterpoints? Are you ready to dispute them?
· Do you have enough evidence to effectively support your argument?
For the stance essay, your personal voice (your perspective) should come through. This is just like assignment 1, except you should
maintain a formal tone.For this essay, you will need to support your points with credible sources. You’re ready to take a position on
the topic you have been writing about!
Important note: Stance Essays DO incorporate research exclusively from the WebText. DO NOT use outside sources. If you have
written a Stance Essay in a previous course, please reach out to your professor to see if you can re-use it. You are not permitted to
use ANY paper from an unrelated current or past course.
INSTRUCTIONS:
You are required to use your WebText to draft your essay in the templates!
Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their)
b. Does your personality carry over in your writing? Are your word choices personal and consistent?
c. Is the tone formal? Does it express your attitude about the topic?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does your introduction include solutions or approaches on the topic?
b. Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that clearly express your stance on the topic?\
c. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
d. Does your introduction provide a preview of the rest of your essay?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggested
that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics?
b. Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have?
c. Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation? Do
you limit quotes to no more than 25 words.
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper?
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that thi ...
Recommended
Touchstone publish an Argumentative Research Essay Using your out.pdf
Touchstone publish an Argumentative Research Essay Using your out.pdfNeed Help With Your Assignments Or Essays?|| Hire Us Today||Email US: Homework1078@gmail.com
course materialsTop of FormBottom of FormPersuasive Essay Peer Review Wor.docx
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Persuasive Essay: Peer Review Worksheet
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers to help them improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Submit this review as an attachment to both your instructor within the assignment bin and into your reply to your peer’s post containing the assigned draft.
Name of the Draft’s Author:
Name of the Peer Reviewer:
Summary
After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3–5 sentences) of the paper. This should include the stance and the three sub-topics used to support the position within the essay. Do not place your own critique of the essay within this space.
Evaluate the Essay
After a second, closer reading of the draft, evaluate the essay using the Persuasive Essay: Final Draft rubric below. Determine the level of achievement appropriate for each assignment criteria. (Level of achievement ranges from Unsatisfactory to Excellent and are found at the top of the rubric. Assignment criteria are found in the left column of the rubric.). Please use the highlighting tool to score your peer within each criteria. Then use the right hand side of the rubric to include a rationale with evidence and examples for the score.
Topic 7 Rubric: Persuasive Essay: Final Draft
Criteria
1
Unsatisfactory
2
Less Than Satisfactory
3
Satisfactory
4
Good
5
Excellent
Why was this score determined for your peer’s essay? What evidence/examples do you have for this score?
% Scaling
0%
65%
75%
85%
100%
Content – 70%
Objective Perspective and Position
Addresses a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify presented position relative to one’s own.
Appropriately identifies one’s own position on the topic. Vague explanation of the position is given. Little reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position completely appeals to emotion instead of reason.
Appropriately identifies one’s position on the topic. Explains the position taken in a coherent way. Sound reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position mostly appeals to emotion instead of reason.
Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Clearly explains the position taken. Sound and detailed reference to specific issues related to the topic is made. Position appeals mostly to reason.
Formulates a clear and precise point of view of the topic. Comprehensively explains the position taken. Specific issues related to the topic are fully presented in great detail. Position appeals to reason.
Rationale for score:
Word Count
Word count is less than half the minimum or more than double the maximum.
Body of essay is more than 100 words over or under the word count.
Body of essay is more than 50 but less than 100 words over or under the word count.
Body of essay is over or under the word count by 50 words or less.
Within the appropriate word count.
Ra ...
Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentat.docx
Following the Topic Selection Guidelines below, choose an argumentative topic to research. This will be your topic throughout the entire course, so the activities required for this assignment will provide the foundation for your future Touchstones. The topic for an argumentative research paper must be a debatable topic, meaning that it involves conflicting viewpoints. Additionally, it cannot be a topic that is already decided or agreed upon by most of society. You will need to take a firm position on the topic and use evidence and logic to support the position. Touchstone 1.2 includes a research question, a working thesis, a detailed outline, and a reflection on this pre-writing process.
A. Topic Selection Guidelines
DIRECTIONS:
You may choose any topic you wish as long as the topic has two clear sides and is not agreed upon by most of society. Your topic should be current, appropriate for an academic context and should have a focus suitable for a 6-8 page essay.
B. Research Guidelines
DIRECTIONS:
Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Research Question and Working Thesis
Keep in mind:
The research question and working thesis are the driving force behind your research and eventual argument.
❒ Your research question should be a single sentence, framed as a question.
❒ Your working thesis should be a single focused sentence, framed as a statement that takes a clear position on the research question.
❒ Include your research question followed by your working thesis.
2. Detailed Outline
Keep in mind:
Your detailed outline provides a map of the argumentative research essay that you will write, including your key claims and the sources that support them. You may not have all your sources yet, and that is fine. The outline is a way to organize your essay and determine which areas (e.g. your sub-points) will require researched evidence as support.
❒ Headings: one for each paragraph with a brief label of the paragraph’s controlling idea(s); at least 7 body paragraphs, an introduction, and a conclusion
❒ Introduction includes your working thesis.
❒ Body paragraphs should each have their own unique title and key points.
❒ Conclusion includes notes on your final thoughts.
❒ Subheadings: two to five for each paragraph, below each heading, indicating key points that support the controlling idea
❒ Sources: one to three for each subheading, as relevant, indicating the support for the key point
❒ For each source, include the author’s name and the idea or information relevant to your argument (e.g. “Lappé on mono-cropping corn/soy and production”).
3. Reflection
❒ Have you displayed a clear understanding of the research activities?
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
C. Reflection Que.
Need help with this assignmentPreliminary research is attached w.docx
Need help with this assignment
Preliminary research is attached with sources. Also a sample is attached to give you an idea of how it should be formatted.
Evaluate a Source
ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested.
In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.
The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)
You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:
1. Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.
2. Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?
Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.
Sample Touchstone
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Source Identification
The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:
❒ Have you provided the author's name?
❒ Have you provided the source title?
❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?
2. Source Evaluation
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's credibility?
❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility?
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's usefulness?
❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness?
3. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)
2. How do you feel this ev.
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 2 INFORMATIVE ESSAYDraft due Week 5 and.docx
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 2: INFORMATIVE ESSAY
Draft due Week 5 and worth 50 points
Revision due Week 7 and worth 150 points
Have you ever needed just the facts?
At times a formal, objectively written approach is more appropriate or even critical for establishing credibility so that your
audience will listen and get informed! The key to informative writing is making the shift from personal opinion to objec-
tive facts. This assignment will provide you with the important opportunity to practice making this shift to a style that is
required in so many workplaces and throughout your academic program.
For this assignment, you will write an informative essay on the topic you have previously chosen. You will need to identify
a problem, need, or process related to your topic. Then you will inform your audience and provide supporting evidence
from a minimum of two credible sources that have been provided in the webtext. Keep in mind, you will continue to use
the standard essay format: Introduction paragraph with a thesis statement, body paragraphs that specifically support the
points in your thesis statement, and a conclusion paragraph.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their)
b. Do you sound impartial, informative/explanatory, and professional? How do you want your reader to feel?
(trust, smarter/informed)
c. Is the tone formal and factual?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does my introduction get the reader’s attention by using an intriguing statistic, quote, question, or scenario?
b. Does my introduction explain the context and state the importance of the problem/issue?
c. Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that can be debated from a different perspec-
tive?
d. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggest-
ed that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics?
b. Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have?
c. Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation?
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper.
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences.
a. Did you paraphrase or restate the thesis in a new way?
b. Did you.
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the.docx
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you can't submit it until you have completed the unit’s Challenges. Once you've submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.
Touchstone 1.1: Engage with a Work of Research
ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the articles provided below and engage in a 2-3 page summary and response dialogue with the source. This will involve providing a detailed summary of the source's argument and responding to that argument with your position based on the information provided in the source.
Article Option 1: "The Recess Debate: A Disjuncture between Educational Policy and Scientific Research"Article Option 2: "Sugar in School Breakfasts: A School District's Perspective"Sample Touchstone
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Article Summary
❒ Have you communicated the source's purpose?
❒ Have you included all of the source's main points?
❒ Have you restated the source's argument in your own words?
2. Article Response
❒ Have you provided your perspective on the source's argument?
❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate why you either agree or disagree with the argument?
3. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
1. What ideas originally came to mind when you first read through the article? Did your initial response to the article change after reading it for a second time? (3-4 sentences)
2. How does paying attention to the way you respond to a source help you formulate your stance on a topic? (2-3 sentences)
C. Rubric
Advanced (90-100%)
Proficient (80-89%)
Acceptable (70-79%)
Needs Improvement (50-69%)
Non-Performance (0-49%)
Source Summary
Summarize the main argument of a research source.
Provides a complete and accurate summary of the article’s main purpose and argument in the writer’s own words.
Provides an accurate summary of the article’s main purpose and argument in the writer’s own words.
Provides an accurate summary, but relies too heavily on source quotations.
Provides an incomplete summary of the article’s main purpose and argument and/or relies too heavily on source quotations.
Does not provide a complete and accurate summary of the article’s main purpose and argument in the writer’s own words.
Source Response
Articulate a response to the argument presented in a research source.
Constructs a thoughtful and academically appropriate response to the source, incl ...
Create an annotated bibliography assignment using your research q
Create an annotated bibliography assignment using your research q
ENG115ASSIGNMENT2STANCEESSAYDRAFTDueWeek
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 2: STANCE ESSAY DRAFT
Due Week 7 and worth 100 points
For your next assignment, you will write a stance essay. A stance essay takes a position on a topic and argues and supports that
position with evidence. Consider your topic:
· What possible positions/arguments are there?
· What position resonates with you? (Which position do you believe is correct?)
· What are your main points?
· What are the counterpoints? Are you ready to dispute them?
· Do you have enough evidence to effectively support your argument?
For the stance essay, your personal voice (your perspective) should come through. This is just like assignment 1, except you should
maintain a formal tone.For this essay, you will need to support your points with credible sources. You’re ready to take a position on
the topic you have been writing about!
Important note: Stance Essays DO incorporate research exclusively from the WebText. DO NOT use outside sources. If you have
written a Stance Essay in a previous course, please reach out to your professor to see if you can re-use it. You are not permitted to
use ANY paper from an unrelated current or past course.
INSTRUCTIONS:
You are required to use your WebText to draft your essay in the templates!
Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their)
b. Does your personality carry over in your writing? Are your word choices personal and consistent?
c. Is the tone formal? Does it express your attitude about the topic?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does your introduction include solutions or approaches on the topic?
b. Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that clearly express your stance on the topic?\
c. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
d. Does your introduction provide a preview of the rest of your essay?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggested
that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics?
b. Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have?
c. Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation? Do
you limit quotes to no more than 25 words.
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper?
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that thi ...
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 3 STANCE ESSAYDue Week 10 and worth 230.docx
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 3: STANCE ESSAY
Due Week 10 and worth 230 points
Congratulations! You made it to your final assignment, and you have learned so much along the way.
• In the personal essay, you learned how to write with a strong personal voice.
• In the informative essay, you learned how to write objectively and support your points with credible sources to
inform the audience.
Now in your final assignment, you will combine these writing techniques to write a stance essay. A stance essay takes a
position on a topic and argues and supports that position with evidence. Consider your topic:
• What possible positions/arguments are there?
• What position resonates with you? (Which position do you believe is correct?)
• What are your main points?
• What are the counterpoints? Are you ready to dispute them?
• Do you have enough evidence to effectively support your argument?
For the stance essay, your personal voice (your perspective) should come through. This is just like assignment 1, except
you should maintain a formal tone. And just like assignment 2, you will need to support your points with credible sources.
You’re ready to take a position on the topic you have been writing about and to be persuasive!
INSTRUCTIONS:
Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their)
b. Does your personality carry over in your writing? Are your word choices personal and consistent?
c. Is the tone formal? Does it express your atitude about the topic?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does your introduction include solutions or approaches on the topic?
b. Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that clearly express your stance on the topic?
c. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
d. Does your introduction provide a preview of the rest of your essay?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggest-
ed that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics?
b. Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have?
c. Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation?
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper.
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences.
a. Did you paraphrase or restate the thesis in a new way?
...
Unit VII Research Paper Draft 3 Follow the directions below for .docx
Unit VII Research Paper Draft 3
Follow the directions below for the completion of your Research Paper Draft 3 (introduction, review of literature, and body) for Unit VII. If you have questions, please email your professor for assistance. As always, you may also seek out the guidance of the Success Center; the tutors are always there to assist you with your writing and comprehension. You may
submit writing assignments to the Success Center by using a “Writing Center Request form” located on the myCSU Student Portal. To submit a “Writing Center Request form,” log into the myCSU Student Portal, click on “Success Center,” and then click on “Tutoring.” If you have questions concerning APA or your writing assignment, you can contact the Success Center at [email protected]or by phone at ext. 6538.
Purpose:
The purpose of Draft 3 is to build upon Draft 2 and to move your drafting process forward so that you can add a body, conclusion, and abstract to your paper, making it a cohesive, whole academic paper.
Description:
In this assignment, you will take Draft 2 (introduction and review of literature), written in Unit VI, and add the body of your paper. Your body paragraphs should contain the six elements indicated below and be developed in an appropriate manner. If the body does not contain these elements, it is likely you have not fully developed the body, and this lack of development can severely impact your grade for this assignment. You will need to write at least four body paragraphs while incorporating five academic sources for this assignment. The paragraphs should be thorough and cover all the listed elements. Your Draft 3 (introduction, review of literature, and body) should include the elements listed below. With the addition of your Body, you should have a paper that is approximately 7-10 pages long, without the addition of a conclusion or abstract and without counting your cover page or references page.
Elements:
Your grade for Draft 3 is largely based on your inclusion of various elements and the overall quality of your writing. Your Draft 3 must contain the following elements.
1. Cover page and APA formatting:
You should include an APA-style cover page for your Draft 3. See the example on page 16 of The CSU APA Guide (6th edition). Your cover page should include the following: the title of your paper, your name, and the name of your university (Columbia Southern University). The running head should include up to 50 characters from the title of the paper, along with a sequential page number in the upper right-hand corner.
2. Introduction:
Using the comments that you received on your Draft 2, revise your introduction. There are some pitfalls to writing an introductory paragraph, and you can avoid some of them by reading through the Checklist: “Avoid Certain Mistakes in the Introduction” on p. 495 of Strategies for Writing Successful Research Papers.
3. Review of literature:
Using the comments that you received on your Draft 1 ...
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that w.docx
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that were interesting in the second half of the semester and how you might apply them in the future to your profession. The reflection paper must be at least minimum 2 pages in length but no longer than 3 pages. The reflection paper must be completed in APA format and must provide at minimum 3 outside resources. Please take a few minutes to review the grading rubic, most of what you will review has to do with content and ensuring you are correct writing style. When completing assignment, please upload the document.
Due Friday August 16th, 2019
TOPICS ARE:
· Ergogenic Aids and Performance
&
· Training at Altitude
FUTURE PROFESSION: Physical Therapy
RUBRIC ~
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension of Material
10.0 pts
Demonstrates excellent comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
8.5 pts
Demonstrates good comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
7.5 pts
Demonstrates fair comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
6.5 pts
Demonstrates poor comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
0.0 pts
No work submitted.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment of Main Points
10.0 pts
Develops main points well in a logical, organized manner.
8.5 pts
Ideas are mostly presented in a logical, organized manner.
7.5 pts
Ideas may stray from topic and are presented with little logic and organization.
6.5 pts
Logic and organization are missing.
0.0 pts
No work submitted.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
10.0 pts
Offers thorough constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
8.5 pts
Occasionally offers constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
7.5 pts
Offers insufficient constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
6.5 pts
Lacks constructive critique ad/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
0.0 pts
No work submitted.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Resources
5.0 pts
Uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
4.0 pts
Mostly uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
3.0 pts
Sometimes uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
2.0 pts
Rarely uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
0.0 pts
Never uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis Through Use of Words
10.0 pts
Always uses own words to synthesize li.
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443
Case Study 3 Instructions: Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet
You will complete the “Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet” case in the Nkomo et al. text (#35 on pp. 112–113, 2011). You will write a 3–5-page essay (total does not include title page or reference page) that answers the 4 questions (1–4) on p. 113. Do not simply answer the questions. This is an essay and must be written to include an introduction, body, and conclusion. It may prove helpful to use the topic of the questions (advantages and disadvantages of internet recruitment and selection, the three approaches to online recruiting and selection, etc.) as section headers in your essay. Your response must be supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed resources. These resources must have been published within the last 5 years. Do not use other textbooks. The essay must be written in current APA format and include a title page, reference page, and in-text citations.
Note: This case study will not use the “small groups” described on p. 113 to answer the 4 questions.
Submit your assignment through SafeAssign as a draft to check for plagiarism before submitting it for points.
Data Analysis Plan
Details:
After the data are collected and before program evaluators meet with management, the data must be analyzed to ensure that it will provide the right type of information for the evaluation. Of vital importance is ensuring that the data fit the indicators identified for analysis. Then, it must be decided how the data and results will be presented. It is important to present the information in ways that make it easy to understand, demonstrate relationships to other data, and allow the information to be used to support decision-making processes. In this assignment, you will write about the methods of analyzing and reporting the study data.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· Locate the data collection procedures you developed in Module 5 to use as reference material for this assignment.
· Locate the mission statement and program description from the existing organization that you referenced in Module 2 to use as examples for this assignment.
· Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Based on ...
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that
Touchstone 2.1 Evaluate a SourceASSIGNMENT For this essay, y.docx
Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a Source
ASSIGNMENT:
For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested.
The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)
You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:
Credibility:
Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.
Usefulness:
Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?
Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.
Sample Touchstone
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS:
Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Source Identification
The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:
❒ Have you provided the author's name?❒ Have you provided the source title?❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?
2. Source Evaluation
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's credibility?❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility?❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's usefulness?❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness?
3. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS:
Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)
How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)
C. Rubric
Advanced (90-100%)Proficient (80-89%)Acceptable (70-79%)Needs Improvement (50-69%)Non-Performance (0-49%)
Thesis Statement
Provide a clear thesis statement with sufficient support.The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is clear, focused, ...
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
Case study D - Crohn's Disease
Review the case study and answer two of the questions posed in the study. To be considered exemplary, you must answer three of the questions. Your introductory paragraph should provide a summary of the case and the purpose statement. Remember to provide a citation for each answer.
I have chosen 3 questions :
1) Describe the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease.
3) Describe the common signs of an exacerbation.
9) Describe the potential complications of an intestinal obstruction hat is not treated promptly.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference pe.
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 1 PERSONAL ESSAYDue Week 3 and worth 10.docx
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 1: PERSONAL ESSAY
Due Week 3 and worth 100 points
You have a wealth of experiences, knowledge, and opinions that make you who you are. For your first assignment you will
share your opinions and/or experiences to write a personal essay.
What is a personal essay? It’s one of many types of formal essays. All formal essays maintain the same basic structure:
Introduction with a thesis statement, supporting paragraphs, and conclusion. The personal essay is a narrative in which
the author writes about an experience that was highly meaningful (usually a lesson was learned) or about a topic that they
have an opinion about. For this assignment, choose a topic and discuss three reasons why the topic is important to you.
The topic choices are presented in your webtext.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Compose a two (2) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use first person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use first person pronouns? (I, we, me, us, my/mine, our/ours)
b. Does your personality carry over in your writing? Are your word choices personal and consistent?
c. Is the tone casual/informal? Does it express your attitude about the topic?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does your introduction include an attention grabber or hook, and/or some background information on the
topic?
b. Does your thesis statement include three personal reasons why the topic is meaningful to you?
c. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
d. Does your introduction provide a preview of the rest of your essay?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggest-
ed that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples, observations, or
experiences?
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper.
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences.
a. Did you paraphrase or restate the thesis in a new way?
b. Did you leave a lasting impression, so that your readers continue thinking about your topic after they have
finished reading?
6. Apply proper grammar, mechanics, punctuation and APA formatting throughout your paper.
a. Did you check your grammar?
i. The way words are put together to make units of meaning: Sentence structure, pronoun-agreement, etc.
b. Did you check your essay for mechanics?
i. All the “technical” stuff in writing: Spelling, capitalization, use of numbers and other symbols, etc.
b. Did you check the punctuation?
i. The “symbols” ...
ENG115ASSIGNMENT2STANCEESSAYDRAFTDueWeek.docx
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 2: STANCE ESSAY DRAFT
Due Week 7 and worth 100 points
For your next assignment, you will write a stance essay. A stance essay takes a position on a topic and argues and supports that
position with evidence. Consider your topic:
· What possible positions/arguments are there?
· What position resonates with you? (Which position do you believe is correct?)
· What are your main points?
· What are the counterpoints? Are you ready to dispute them?
· Do you have enough evidence to effectively support your argument?
For the stance essay, your personal voice (your perspective) should come through. This is just like assignment 1, except you should
maintain a formal tone.For this essay, you will need to support your points with credible sources. You’re ready to take a position on
the topic you have been writing about!
Important note: Stance Essays DO incorporate research exclusively from the WebText. DO NOT use outside sources. If you have
written a Stance Essay in a previous course, please reach out to your professor to see if you can re-use it. You are not permitted to
use ANY paper from an unrelated current or past course.
INSTRUCTIONS:
You are required to use your WebText to draft your essay in the templates!
Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their)
b. Does your personality carry over in your writing? Are your word choices personal and consistent?
c. Is the tone formal? Does it express your attitude about the topic?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does your introduction include solutions or approaches on the topic?
b. Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that clearly express your stance on the topic?\
c. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
d. Does your introduction provide a preview of the rest of your essay?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggested
that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics?
b. Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have?
c. Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation? Do
you limit quotes to no more than 25 words.
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper?
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that thi.
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
Top of Form
reviewing the Literature and Theory
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Literature Review and Supporting Argument
References are not categorized in an appropriately logical manner. Little or no information is given regarding the value of the references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation does an incomplete job of categorizing project references. Review does a superficial or incomplete job of describing the value of references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation categorizes information from project references appropriately and incorporates the supporting evidence into an argument that validates the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation clearly categorizes and incorporates applicable information from project references and applies the basic research well towards validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Collection of references covers most aspects of the project in adequate depth.
Presentation utilizes the categorized information from the references in a clear and comprehensive manner to clearly validate and support the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project; Collection of references is comprehensive and supports all aspects of the project.
20.0 %Critical Analysis of Supporting Data
Argument is more of a literature review than a supporting, critical analysis of the reference contributions to the project.
Argument does not utilize reference information adequately to provide support for why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Argument is somewhat vague or incomplete.
Argument uses relevant findings from supporting references to present a basic position as to why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Minimal acceptable details are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject.
Argument uses reference material in an appropriate manner to convince the reader that the problem, purpose, and possible solution are clearly valid. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
Argument is convincing and clearly articulated with adequate supporting references to validate the problem, purpose, and solution of the project. Argument demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding.
20.0 %Incorporation of a Valid Theory to Support the Project
A valid theory to be incorporated in support of the project is not identified or explained, or a theory is improperly stated. Subject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated.
Identification and explanation of a valid theory to incorporate in support of the project is somewhat vague or incomplete.
A valid theory is identified and a basic explanation is provided of how the theory is incorporated in support of the project. Minimal acceptable details are pr ...
NR 507 – Week 3 Discussion PurposeThe purpose of this discus.docx
NR 507 – Week 3 Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to apply pathophysiological concepts to an individual presenting with cardiovascular dysfunction (heart failure). Related concepts will also be applied that includes potential alterations in fluid and electrolytes and acid/base balance.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
1. Explore age-specific and developmental alterations in the cardiovascular system. (CO 3, 1)
2. Relate pathophysiological alterations in cardiovascular processes to the development, diagnosis and treatment of heart failure. (CO 4, 2)
3. Examine current evidence to support the management of patients who present with alterations in the cardiovascular system. (CO 5, 3)
Total Points Possible: 100
Requirements:
A 64-year-old woman presents to the primary care office with shortness of breath, leg swelling, and fatigue. She has a history of type 2 diabetes and hypertension. She reports that recently she had been able to go for daily walks with her friends, but in the past month, the walks have become more difficult due to shortness of breath and fatigue. She also sometimes awakens in the middle of the night due to shortness of breath and has to prop herself up on three pillows. On physical examination, she is tachycardic (110 beats per minute) and has a blood pressure of 106/74 mm Hg. Fine crackles are noted on inspiration in bilateral bases. The cardiac exam reveals the presence of a third and fourth heart sound and jugular venous distension. 2+ pitting edema is noted in the knees bilaterally. An ECG shows sinus rhythm at 110 bpm with Q waves in the anterior leads. An echocardiogram shows decreased wall motion of the anterior wall of the heart and an estimated ejection fraction of 25%. She is diagnosed with systolic heart failure, secondary to a silent MI.
1. Discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms that can lead to heart failure.
2. Differentiate between systolic and diastolic heart dysfunction
3. Discuss the causes of the patient’s shortness of breath, awakening in the middle of the night and the need to prop herself up on three pillows. Include pathophysiological mechanisms that causes each of these signs and symptoms.
4. Include two points of teaching for this patient
5. Support your response with at least one current evidence based resource.
6. Students must post a minimum of three times in each graded discussion (see participation guidelines below).
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Application of Course Knowledge
30
30%
1. Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant, evidence based outside sources, AND
2. Posts are on topic and answer all presented questions which demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic.
3. Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life, AND
4. Decisions are well support ...
1009W MLC Prerequisite Expository Essay NAME ASSIGNMENT.docx
1009W MLC Prerequisite Expository Essay
NAME:
ASSIGNMENT TITLE: MLC Prerequisite Expository Essay DATE:
FACILITATOR:
RATING: UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
RANGE: 0-39.9 40-69.9 70-89.9 90-100
EARNED:
COGNITIVE LEVEL ATTAINED: Higher levels include characteristics of lower levels
ANALYZING:
Breaking material into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to each other and to
an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing, and attributing.
APPLYING: Carrying out or using a procedure through executing or implementing.
UNDERSTANDING:
Constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting,
exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining.
REMEMBERING: Retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge from long-term memory.
WRITING ASSIGNMENT: Prerequisite Expository Essay
Requirements for this assignment are located in paragraph three of the welcome letter.
Facilitator Comments:
Facilitator Signature:
Learner Comments:
Learner Signature:
Learner: Prerequisite Expository Essay
Instructions:
Learners will prepare an original PEE on the contemporary Army issue facing the Sexual Harassment/Assault Response Prevention (SHARP) program within
their organizations. In your essay, explain two recommendations that might improve the effectiveness of your unit’s SHARP program. In doing so, use your
personal experience and at least three references to support your proposals. This paper must set forth an argument concerning your own experience in this
category. You will write in a clear and concise manner while using correct grammar, sentence structure, and word usage. You must provide a coherent
transition from one topic to the next using the provided rubric as a general guideline. Your essay must be in Times New Roman, 12pt font, double-spaced,
APA 6th edition format without an abstract, tables, charts, etc. The essay must be a minimum of three pages and no longer than five pages in length, not
including the title and reference pages.
General (Topics)
Unsatisfactory
0-3.9 pts
Needs Improvement
4-6.9 pts
Satisfactory
7-8.9 pts
Superior
9-10 pts
Topic Introduction:
20%
The text has an unclear topic
with very few ideas,
concepts, information, etc.;
no thesis statement.
The text focuses on a topic
that informs the reader on
ideas, concepts, and
information, etc.; little to
no thesis statement.
The text focuses on a topic
that informs the reader on
ideas, concepts, information,
etc.; thesis statement is
present but vague.
The text clearly focuses on a topic
that informs the reader on ideas,
concepts, information, etc.;
provides a strong thesis
statement.
Topic Development:
40%
The text provides facts,
definitions, details,
quotations, and examples
that attempt to develop and
explain the topic. The
conclusion merely restates
the development.
The text provid.
3162020 Discussion Question Rubrichttpslmscontent.emb.docx
3/16/2020 Discussion Question Rubric
https://lmscontent.embanet.com/RC/General/MSN/Rubrics/Discussion_Question_Rubric_1.html 1/3
Discussion Question Rubric
Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review
assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total
Points
Quality of
Initial Post
Provides clear examples
supported by course
content and references.
Cites three or more
references, using at least
one new scholarly
resource that was not
provided in the course
materials.
All instruction
requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly
represented, with explanations and
application of knowledge to include
evidence-based practice, ethics, theory,
and/or role. Synthesizes course content
using course materials and scholarly
resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the
discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented
primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas
may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the
subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-
based practice, theory, or role development.
Synthesis of course content is present but missing
depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the
discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly
support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to
evidence-based
practice, theory, or
role development.
Synthesis of course
content is superficial.
Demonstrates
incomplete
understanding of
content and/or
inadequate
preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several
instruction
requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points
40
3/16/2020 Discussion Question Rubric
https://lmscontent.embanet.com/RC/General/MSN/Rubrics/Discussion_Question_Rubric_1.html 2/3
Peer
Response
Post
Offers both supportive
and alternative viewpoints
to the discussion, using
two or more scholarly
references per peer post.
Post provides additional
value to the conversation.
All instruction
requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course
content. Provides clarification and new
information or insight related to the
content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content
and a minimum of one scholarly reference
per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly
reference supports the content in the peer post
without adding new information or insight.
Missing reference from one peer post.
Partially followed instructions regarding number ...
3162020 Discussion Question Rubrichttpslmscontent.emb.docx
3/16/2020 Discussion Question Rubric
https://lmscontent.embanet.com/RC/General/MSN/Rubrics/Discussion_Question_Rubric_1.html 1/3
Discussion Question Rubric
Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review
assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total
Points
Quality of
Initial Post
Provides clear examples
supported by course
content and references.
Cites three or more
references, using at least
one new scholarly
resource that was not
provided in the course
materials.
All instruction
requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly
represented, with explanations and
application of knowledge to include
evidence-based practice, ethics, theory,
and/or role. Synthesizes course content
using course materials and scholarly
resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the
discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented
primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas
may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the
subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-
based practice, theory, or role development.
Synthesis of course content is present but missing
depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the
discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly
support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to
evidence-based
practice, theory, or
role development.
Synthesis of course
content is superficial.
Demonstrates
incomplete
understanding of
content and/or
inadequate
preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several
instruction
requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points
40
3/16/2020 Discussion Question Rubric
https://lmscontent.embanet.com/RC/General/MSN/Rubrics/Discussion_Question_Rubric_1.html 2/3
Peer
Response
Post
Offers both supportive
and alternative viewpoints
to the discussion, using
two or more scholarly
references per peer post.
Post provides additional
value to the conversation.
All instruction
requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course
content. Provides clarification and new
information or insight related to the
content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content
and a minimum of one scholarly reference
per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly
reference supports the content in the peer post
without adding new information or insight.
Missing reference from one peer post.
Partially followed instructions regarding number.
Final Research Paper DraftIf this video does not load prop
Final Research Paper Draft
If this video does not load properly, it can be accessed by
clicking here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
.
Transcript
This week you will be creating and submitting a draft of your Final Research Paper that is based on the topic you selected from the
Research Paper Guidelines
and from the Final Research Paper Outline from Week Two. Please be sure to review the
Model Research Paper Draft
and
Week Three Assignment Template
to understand the expectations for the assignment this week.
The Final Research Paper Draft must contain the following components:
A title page and a references page (based upon your annotated bibliography).
An introduction that features a thesis statement that is clearly articulated and argumentative and/or analytical. Ideally, the introduction should be a single, compelling paragraph.
Body paragraphs that develop at least one research-supported argument. (Note: The body of your paper should feature in-text citations that leverage at least four different sources.)
APA-style formatting, including properly documented citations.
Your draft must be 750 to 2,000 words in length, excluding the title and references pages. Remember to proofread your work for errors in grammar, mechanics, style, and formatting. Submit as much work as possible, whether it is a full or partial draft. Please refer to
Research Paper Guidelines
as well as Week Five Final Research Paper instructions.
The purpose of the Final Research Paper Draft is to ensure you are making satisfactory progress on your Final Research Paper while providing you with an opportunity to receive direction and feedback from your instructor. If you find that you are struggling to complete the draft, make sure that you have read and reviewed this week’s required activities. Additionally, consider contacting your instructor for additional one-on-one guidance.
Submission Information:
Complete the task above and save the document as a Microsoft Word or PDF file. Submit your assignment via the
Assignment Submission
button. Please use a naming convention for your assignment file that includes your last name, the week number, and the assignment number. So, your Final Research Paper Draft assignment should bear a file name that looks like: smithENG122w3.doc or smithENG122w3.pdf.
Writing specialists are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you!
Click
HERE
to instantly chat with an online tutor.
Click
HERE
to submit your paper for a review. Papers are returned within 24 hours with a revision plan.
Click
HERE
to email us any writing questions.
For additional writing resources like
Grammarly (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
, click on the Writing Center tab in the left navigation pane.
Carefully review the
Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Description
:
Total Po ...
2 Dissertation ProspectusInsert Prospectus Title .docx
2
Dissertation Prospectus
<Insert Prospectus Title >
Submitted by
<Insert Name>
<Insert Submission Date>
<Insert Chair Name>
Prospectus Instructions:
1. Read the entire Prospectus Template to understand the requirements for writing your Prospectus. Each section contains a narrative overview of what should be included in the section and a table with criteria required for each section. These criteria will be used to assess the prospectus for overall quality and feasibility of the proposed research study.
2. As you draft each section, delete the narrative instructions and insert your work related to that section. Use the criteria table for each section to ensure that you address the requirements for that particular section. Do not delete/remove the criteria table as this is used by you and your Committee to evaluate your prospectus.
3. Prior to submitting your prospectus for review by your Chair or Methodologist, use the criteria table for each section to complete a self-evaluation, inserting what you believe is your score for each listed criteria into the Learner Self-Evaluation column.
4. The scoring for the criteria ranges from a 0-3 as defined below. Complete a realistic and thoughtful evaluation of your work. Your Chair and Methodologist will also use the criteria tables to evaluate your work.
5. Your Prospectus should be between 6-10 pages when the tables are deleted.
Score
Assessment
0
Item Not Present
1
Item is Present, But Does Not Meet Expectations: Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. All items scored at 1 must be addressed by learner per reviewer comments.
2
Item Approaches Meeting Expectations, But Needs Revision: Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Any item scored at 2 must be addressed by the learner per the reviewer comments.
3
Item Meets Expectations: Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. No changes required.
2
Dissertation Prospectus
Introduction
The Prospectus is 6-10 page document that serves as a road map for the dissertation. It provides the essential framework to guide the development of the dissertation proposal. The Prospectus builds on the 10 Strategic Points (shown in Appendix A). The Prospectus will be expanded to become your dissertation proposal (Chapters 1, 2 and 3 of your dissertation), which will in turn, be expanded to become the complete dissertation (Chapters 1-5). Prior to developing the Prospectus, the 10 Strategic Points should be reviewed with the Chair and Committee to ensure the10 Strategic Points are aligned and that you have a clear, defined, and a doable study. Your 10 Strategic Points should be included in Appendix A of this Prospectus document.
The Introduction section broadly describes the research focus that will be addressed by the dissertation and why that focus i ...
Argument Position Essay RubricContent 151051 90 total.docx
Argument Position Essay Rubric
Content
15
10
5
1
90 total
Introduction
Well-developed introduction that engages readers and creates interest. Identifies a compelling, controversial issue/topic
Contains detailed background information on said topic.
Introduction creates interest.
Identifies a controversial issue/topic
Provides some background information.
Needs minor work.
Introduction is adequate, but does not catch the reader’s attention and/or does not clearly set up the purpose of the paper. Needs moderate work.
.
Introduction is inadequate and/or needs major work. Writer does not attempt to create interest. Background details are a random collection of information, unclear, or not related. Introduction is missing.
Thesis Statement
Clear thesis statement that identifies the main reasons that will support the position and direct the reader toward the point of the paper.
Thesis statement is arguable and the writer takes a clear stance.
Clear thesis statement is present, but may be lacking one reason or could be more engaging and/or direct.
Thesis statement is arguable
Thesis is vague and unclear. It requires effort on the part of the reader to discern the point of the paper and the reasons supporting your position.
Thesis is not arguable
Stance is unclear and vague
No thesis present, or thesis is so inadequate that the point of the paper is completely unclear.
Body Paragraphs
Body paragraphs include a topic sentence that connects to thesis and states the main focus of paragraph
Well-developed/relevant examples, details, and evidence.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are relevant and enhance the explanation of the content.
It is clear and focused, demonstrates original thought/reflection/insight. It holds the reader’s attention.
The paper effectively covers the topic.
Body paragraphs support thesis with examples, details, and evidence
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are relevant and adequately explain the content.
It is reasonably clear and focused, and the writer goes beyond the superficial or obvious. It holds the reader’s attention. On the whole, accurate details or clear thoughts are present to support the main idea (reasons).
. It effectively covers the topic.
Topic Sentences are vague and unclear
Body paragraphs offer adequate support to thesis, but examples, details, and support do not go far enough.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are present, but does not enhance and/or explain the content or demonstrate thought/reflection/analysis or specifics.
Lacks full development of ideas.
No topic sentences present
Inadequate number of major points/reasons. Body paragraphs inadequately support the thesis, and examples, details, and quotes are significantly underdeveloped.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are weak, inadequate, or missing.
. It shows no clear sense of purpose and does not reveal reflection. The text reads like a collection of ...
Media Analysisby Kelechi OnyekwereSubmission date 07-Ju
Media Analysis
by Kelechi Onyekwere
Submission date: 07-Jul-2021 10:31PM (UTC-0400)
Submission ID: 1616968636
File name: oodle_temp_turnitintool_1301193303.Media_Analysis_Onyekwere.docx (17.87K)
Word count: 617
Character count: 3105
1
Hello!
*Revise T
Wordy
*Format citati
1
Review to
CTRL - C
2
*Format citatio
*Develop id
Include evid
*Develop id
*Revise parenthet
Connect to
Revise conclus
3%
SIMILARITY INDEX
3%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
0%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 3%
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches < 3 words
Media Analysis
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
theloraxfilm.wikia.com
Internet Source
QM
QM
FINAL GRADE
1/1
Media Analysis
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
Hello, Kelechi! I enjoyed reading your media
analysis essay. You have a great draft going here
as you've included many specific details and
examples throughout to examine how one part
affects the whole media production.
I've made some rubric-specific notes throughout
for your consideration. For example, you'll need to
clarify your introduction to introduce the film right
from the beginning.
Also, you should revise your thesis a bit as well as
add content throughout. Make sure to use
citations in MLA style as well.
I look forward to reading more of your work,
Kelechi.
JV
PAGE 1
Hello!
My name is J.V. I hope these comments will assist you as you continue to learn about the
writing process. I look forward to reading your work!
*Revise Title* | Format
Here, instead of using the topic of the assignment or a shortened title, you could create a
title which captures the reader's attention. Example:
QM
QM
A narrative essay on a first road trip: Waterfalls and Concrete
A compare and contrast essay: Is One Mode of Technology Better?
A research/argumentative essay: Spyware: What Matters Most
A persuasive letter: Families Should Spend Time Together
What do you think?
Wordy | Language
Wordy:
If you use too many words to describe a relatively minor point, your paper may seem wordy.
In order to be as concise as possible, trim your sentences down and use longer, more
meaningful words. Try to use fewer two- and three-letter words, passive constructions, and
weak verbs such as "seem" and "appear."
Additional Comment
Instead, introduce the film or book you'll be discussing (the Lorax).
*Format citation to meet MLA style | Research
You should punctuate/format your citations correctly (here's a link to MLA In-Text Citations
Basics).
Also, here's an example:
Paraphrase:
...and then the economy would flourish (Smith 45).
Direct quote:
"...and the economy would do well" (Smith 45).
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_in_text_citations_the_basics.html
QM
QM
QM
Or, you'll use part of the name of the article (1-3 words) if there is no author, like this:
("Global Warming" 562).
No page numbers:
("Global Warming").
Always place ...
Most women experience their closest friendships with those of th.docx
Most women experience their closest friendships with those of the same sex. Men have suffered more of a stigma in terms of sharing deep bonds with other men. Open affection and connection is not actively encouraged among men. Recent changes in society might impact this, especially with the advent of the meterosexual male. “The meterosexual male is less interested in blood lines, traditions, family, class, gender, than in choosing who they want to be and who they want to be with” (Vernon, 2010, p. 204).
In this week’s reading material, the following philosophers discuss their views on this topic: Simone de Beauvoir, Thomas Aquinas, MacIntyre, Friedman, Hunt, and Foucault. Make sure to incorporate their views as you answer each discussion question. Think about how their views may be similar or different from your own. In at least 250 words total, please answer each of the following, drawing upon your reading materials and your personal insight:
To what extent do you think women still have a better opportunity to forge deeper friendships than men? What needs to change to level the friendship playing field for men, if anything?
How is the role of the meterosexual man helping to forge a new pathway for male friendships?
.
Morgan and Dunn JD have hired you to assist with a case involvin.docx
Morgan and Dunn JD have hired you to assist with a case involving domestic abuse. The evidence is contained on a password-protected laptop that the plaintiff (the wife) indicates will show a pattern of abuse. You have to decide what equipment and software to purchase to assist with the case and safely extract the data from the laptop.
.
Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the gene.docx
Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the general population. Discuss the leading causes of death and illness among Hispanic Americans and the options the Advanced Practice Nurse has to overcome the disparity of healthcare for this population.
The post should be a minimum of 200 words, scholarly written, APA7 formatted, and referenced. Free of plagiarism and gramatical errors. A minimum of 2 references is required (other than your text).
.
More Related Content
Similar to Name CourseDateInstructor Expository Essay Outline.docx
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 3 STANCE ESSAYDue Week 10 and worth 230.docx
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 3: STANCE ESSAY
Due Week 10 and worth 230 points
Congratulations! You made it to your final assignment, and you have learned so much along the way.
• In the personal essay, you learned how to write with a strong personal voice.
• In the informative essay, you learned how to write objectively and support your points with credible sources to
inform the audience.
Now in your final assignment, you will combine these writing techniques to write a stance essay. A stance essay takes a
position on a topic and argues and supports that position with evidence. Consider your topic:
• What possible positions/arguments are there?
• What position resonates with you? (Which position do you believe is correct?)
• What are your main points?
• What are the counterpoints? Are you ready to dispute them?
• Do you have enough evidence to effectively support your argument?
For the stance essay, your personal voice (your perspective) should come through. This is just like assignment 1, except
you should maintain a formal tone. And just like assignment 2, you will need to support your points with credible sources.
You’re ready to take a position on the topic you have been writing about and to be persuasive!
INSTRUCTIONS:
Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their)
b. Does your personality carry over in your writing? Are your word choices personal and consistent?
c. Is the tone formal? Does it express your atitude about the topic?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does your introduction include solutions or approaches on the topic?
b. Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that clearly express your stance on the topic?
c. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
d. Does your introduction provide a preview of the rest of your essay?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggest-
ed that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics?
b. Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have?
c. Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation?
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper.
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences.
a. Did you paraphrase or restate the thesis in a new way?
...
Unit VII Research Paper Draft 3 Follow the directions below for .docx
Unit VII Research Paper Draft 3
Follow the directions below for the completion of your Research Paper Draft 3 (introduction, review of literature, and body) for Unit VII. If you have questions, please email your professor for assistance. As always, you may also seek out the guidance of the Success Center; the tutors are always there to assist you with your writing and comprehension. You may
submit writing assignments to the Success Center by using a “Writing Center Request form” located on the myCSU Student Portal. To submit a “Writing Center Request form,” log into the myCSU Student Portal, click on “Success Center,” and then click on “Tutoring.” If you have questions concerning APA or your writing assignment, you can contact the Success Center at [email protected]or by phone at ext. 6538.
Purpose:
The purpose of Draft 3 is to build upon Draft 2 and to move your drafting process forward so that you can add a body, conclusion, and abstract to your paper, making it a cohesive, whole academic paper.
Description:
In this assignment, you will take Draft 2 (introduction and review of literature), written in Unit VI, and add the body of your paper. Your body paragraphs should contain the six elements indicated below and be developed in an appropriate manner. If the body does not contain these elements, it is likely you have not fully developed the body, and this lack of development can severely impact your grade for this assignment. You will need to write at least four body paragraphs while incorporating five academic sources for this assignment. The paragraphs should be thorough and cover all the listed elements. Your Draft 3 (introduction, review of literature, and body) should include the elements listed below. With the addition of your Body, you should have a paper that is approximately 7-10 pages long, without the addition of a conclusion or abstract and without counting your cover page or references page.
Elements:
Your grade for Draft 3 is largely based on your inclusion of various elements and the overall quality of your writing. Your Draft 3 must contain the following elements.
1. Cover page and APA formatting:
You should include an APA-style cover page for your Draft 3. See the example on page 16 of The CSU APA Guide (6th edition). Your cover page should include the following: the title of your paper, your name, and the name of your university (Columbia Southern University). The running head should include up to 50 characters from the title of the paper, along with a sequential page number in the upper right-hand corner.
2. Introduction:
Using the comments that you received on your Draft 2, revise your introduction. There are some pitfalls to writing an introductory paragraph, and you can avoid some of them by reading through the Checklist: “Avoid Certain Mistakes in the Introduction” on p. 495 of Strategies for Writing Successful Research Papers.
3. Review of literature:
Using the comments that you received on your Draft 1 ...
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that w.docx
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that were interesting in the second half of the semester and how you might apply them in the future to your profession. The reflection paper must be at least minimum 2 pages in length but no longer than 3 pages. The reflection paper must be completed in APA format and must provide at minimum 3 outside resources. Please take a few minutes to review the grading rubic, most of what you will review has to do with content and ensuring you are correct writing style. When completing assignment, please upload the document.
Due Friday August 16th, 2019
TOPICS ARE:
· Ergogenic Aids and Performance
&
· Training at Altitude
FUTURE PROFESSION: Physical Therapy
RUBRIC ~
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension of Material
10.0 pts
Demonstrates excellent comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
8.5 pts
Demonstrates good comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
7.5 pts
Demonstrates fair comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
6.5 pts
Demonstrates poor comprehension of the assignment’s key principles and issues.
0.0 pts
No work submitted.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment of Main Points
10.0 pts
Develops main points well in a logical, organized manner.
8.5 pts
Ideas are mostly presented in a logical, organized manner.
7.5 pts
Ideas may stray from topic and are presented with little logic and organization.
6.5 pts
Logic and organization are missing.
0.0 pts
No work submitted.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
10.0 pts
Offers thorough constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
8.5 pts
Occasionally offers constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
7.5 pts
Offers insufficient constructive critique and/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
6.5 pts
Lacks constructive critique ad/or in-depth analysis, insight, reflection.
0.0 pts
No work submitted.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Resources
5.0 pts
Uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
4.0 pts
Mostly uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
3.0 pts
Sometimes uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
2.0 pts
Rarely uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
0.0 pts
Never uses current and credible literature (peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.) beyond course materials to support claims and rationale.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis Through Use of Words
10.0 pts
Always uses own words to synthesize li.
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443
Case Study 3 Instructions: Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet
You will complete the “Recruiting and Selecting High-Level Managers through the Internet” case in the Nkomo et al. text (#35 on pp. 112–113, 2011). You will write a 3–5-page essay (total does not include title page or reference page) that answers the 4 questions (1–4) on p. 113. Do not simply answer the questions. This is an essay and must be written to include an introduction, body, and conclusion. It may prove helpful to use the topic of the questions (advantages and disadvantages of internet recruitment and selection, the three approaches to online recruiting and selection, etc.) as section headers in your essay. Your response must be supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed resources. These resources must have been published within the last 5 years. Do not use other textbooks. The essay must be written in current APA format and include a title page, reference page, and in-text citations.
Note: This case study will not use the “small groups” described on p. 113 to answer the 4 questions.
Submit your assignment through SafeAssign as a draft to check for plagiarism before submitting it for points.
Data Analysis Plan
Details:
After the data are collected and before program evaluators meet with management, the data must be analyzed to ensure that it will provide the right type of information for the evaluation. Of vital importance is ensuring that the data fit the indicators identified for analysis. Then, it must be decided how the data and results will be presented. It is important to present the information in ways that make it easy to understand, demonstrate relationships to other data, and allow the information to be used to support decision-making processes. In this assignment, you will write about the methods of analyzing and reporting the study data.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
· Locate the data collection procedures you developed in Module 5 to use as reference material for this assignment.
· Locate the mission statement and program description from the existing organization that you referenced in Module 2 to use as examples for this assignment.
· Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
· This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Based on ...
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that
Touchstone 2.1 Evaluate a SourceASSIGNMENT For this essay, y.docx
Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a Source
ASSIGNMENT:
For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found through your preliminary research about your research topic. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested.
The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)
You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:
Credibility:
Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.
Usefulness:
Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?
Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.
Sample Touchstone
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS:
Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Source Identification
The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:
❒ Have you provided the author's name?❒ Have you provided the source title?❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?
2. Source Evaluation
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's credibility?❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility?❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source's usefulness?❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness?
3. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection Questions
DIRECTIONS:
Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)
How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)
C. Rubric
Advanced (90-100%)Proficient (80-89%)Acceptable (70-79%)Needs Improvement (50-69%)Non-Performance (0-49%)
Thesis Statement
Provide a clear thesis statement with sufficient support.The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is clear, focused, ...
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
Case study D - Crohn's Disease
Review the case study and answer two of the questions posed in the study. To be considered exemplary, you must answer three of the questions. Your introductory paragraph should provide a summary of the case and the purpose statement. Remember to provide a citation for each answer.
I have chosen 3 questions :
1) Describe the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease.
3) Describe the common signs of an exacerbation.
9) Describe the potential complications of an intestinal obstruction hat is not treated promptly.
Rubric:
Discussion Question Rubric
Note:
Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40
Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference pe.
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 1 PERSONAL ESSAYDue Week 3 and worth 10.docx
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 1: PERSONAL ESSAY
Due Week 3 and worth 100 points
You have a wealth of experiences, knowledge, and opinions that make you who you are. For your first assignment you will
share your opinions and/or experiences to write a personal essay.
What is a personal essay? It’s one of many types of formal essays. All formal essays maintain the same basic structure:
Introduction with a thesis statement, supporting paragraphs, and conclusion. The personal essay is a narrative in which
the author writes about an experience that was highly meaningful (usually a lesson was learned) or about a topic that they
have an opinion about. For this assignment, choose a topic and discuss three reasons why the topic is important to you.
The topic choices are presented in your webtext.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Compose a two (2) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use first person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use first person pronouns? (I, we, me, us, my/mine, our/ours)
b. Does your personality carry over in your writing? Are your word choices personal and consistent?
c. Is the tone casual/informal? Does it express your attitude about the topic?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does your introduction include an attention grabber or hook, and/or some background information on the
topic?
b. Does your thesis statement include three personal reasons why the topic is meaningful to you?
c. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
d. Does your introduction provide a preview of the rest of your essay?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggest-
ed that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples, observations, or
experiences?
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper.
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7 sentences.
a. Did you paraphrase or restate the thesis in a new way?
b. Did you leave a lasting impression, so that your readers continue thinking about your topic after they have
finished reading?
6. Apply proper grammar, mechanics, punctuation and APA formatting throughout your paper.
a. Did you check your grammar?
i. The way words are put together to make units of meaning: Sentence structure, pronoun-agreement, etc.
b. Did you check your essay for mechanics?
i. All the “technical” stuff in writing: Spelling, capitalization, use of numbers and other symbols, etc.
b. Did you check the punctuation?
i. The “symbols” ...
ENG115ASSIGNMENT2STANCEESSAYDRAFTDueWeek.docx
ENG 115
ASSIGNMENT 2: STANCE ESSAY DRAFT
Due Week 7 and worth 100 points
For your next assignment, you will write a stance essay. A stance essay takes a position on a topic and argues and supports that
position with evidence. Consider your topic:
· What possible positions/arguments are there?
· What position resonates with you? (Which position do you believe is correct?)
· What are your main points?
· What are the counterpoints? Are you ready to dispute them?
· Do you have enough evidence to effectively support your argument?
For the stance essay, your personal voice (your perspective) should come through. This is just like assignment 1, except you should
maintain a formal tone.For this essay, you will need to support your points with credible sources. You’re ready to take a position on
the topic you have been writing about!
Important note: Stance Essays DO incorporate research exclusively from the WebText. DO NOT use outside sources. If you have
written a Stance Essay in a previous course, please reach out to your professor to see if you can re-use it. You are not permitted to
use ANY paper from an unrelated current or past course.
INSTRUCTIONS:
You are required to use your WebText to draft your essay in the templates!
Compose a three-four (3-4) page paper in which you do the following:
1. Use third person point of view (POV) and the appropriate voice and tone throughout your paper.
a. Did you use third person pronouns? (he, she, they, their)
b. Does your personality carry over in your writing? Are your word choices personal and consistent?
c. Is the tone formal? Does it express your attitude about the topic?
2. Write an introduction paragraph, which includes your thesis statement. It is suggested that this paragraph contain 5-7
sentences.
a. Does your introduction include solutions or approaches on the topic?
b. Does your thesis statement include three supporting reasons that clearly express your stance on the topic?\
c. Is your thesis statement clear and concise?
d. Does your introduction provide a preview of the rest of your essay?
3. Write a supporting/body paragraph for each of the three (3) points/reasons from your thesis statement. It is suggested
that each paragraph contain at least 5-7 sentences.
a. Do your body paragraphs support each point of your thesis with relevant examples or statistics?
b. Do you address the opinions or concerns that your audience might have?
c. Did you paraphrase, quote, or summarize properly to avoid plagiarism? Did you comment on each quotation? Do
you limit quotes to no more than 25 words.
4. Write with logic and with transitions throughout your paper?
a. Are your ideas consistent and well-organized, i.e., chronological order or order of importance?
b. Do your ideas flow from one sentence to the next and one paragraph to the next, in the order presented in your
thesis statement?
5. Write a conclusion paragraph. It is suggested that thi.
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
Top of Form
reviewing the Literature and Theory
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Literature Review and Supporting Argument
References are not categorized in an appropriately logical manner. Little or no information is given regarding the value of the references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation does an incomplete job of categorizing project references. Review does a superficial or incomplete job of describing the value of references in validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation categorizes information from project references appropriately and incorporates the supporting evidence into an argument that validates the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project.
Presentation clearly categorizes and incorporates applicable information from project references and applies the basic research well towards validating the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project. Collection of references covers most aspects of the project in adequate depth.
Presentation utilizes the categorized information from the references in a clear and comprehensive manner to clearly validate and support the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project; Collection of references is comprehensive and supports all aspects of the project.
20.0 %Critical Analysis of Supporting Data
Argument is more of a literature review than a supporting, critical analysis of the reference contributions to the project.
Argument does not utilize reference information adequately to provide support for why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Argument is somewhat vague or incomplete.
Argument uses relevant findings from supporting references to present a basic position as to why the problem, purpose, and proposed solution of the project are valid. Minimal acceptable details are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject.
Argument uses reference material in an appropriate manner to convince the reader that the problem, purpose, and possible solution are clearly valid. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
Argument is convincing and clearly articulated with adequate supporting references to validate the problem, purpose, and solution of the project. Argument demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and understanding.
20.0 %Incorporation of a Valid Theory to Support the Project
A valid theory to be incorporated in support of the project is not identified or explained, or a theory is improperly stated. Subject knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated.
Identification and explanation of a valid theory to incorporate in support of the project is somewhat vague or incomplete.
A valid theory is identified and a basic explanation is provided of how the theory is incorporated in support of the project. Minimal acceptable details are pr ...
NR 507 – Week 3 Discussion PurposeThe purpose of this discus.docx
NR 507 – Week 3 Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to apply pathophysiological concepts to an individual presenting with cardiovascular dysfunction (heart failure). Related concepts will also be applied that includes potential alterations in fluid and electrolytes and acid/base balance.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
1. Explore age-specific and developmental alterations in the cardiovascular system. (CO 3, 1)
2. Relate pathophysiological alterations in cardiovascular processes to the development, diagnosis and treatment of heart failure. (CO 4, 2)
3. Examine current evidence to support the management of patients who present with alterations in the cardiovascular system. (CO 5, 3)
Total Points Possible: 100
Requirements:
A 64-year-old woman presents to the primary care office with shortness of breath, leg swelling, and fatigue. She has a history of type 2 diabetes and hypertension. She reports that recently she had been able to go for daily walks with her friends, but in the past month, the walks have become more difficult due to shortness of breath and fatigue. She also sometimes awakens in the middle of the night due to shortness of breath and has to prop herself up on three pillows. On physical examination, she is tachycardic (110 beats per minute) and has a blood pressure of 106/74 mm Hg. Fine crackles are noted on inspiration in bilateral bases. The cardiac exam reveals the presence of a third and fourth heart sound and jugular venous distension. 2+ pitting edema is noted in the knees bilaterally. An ECG shows sinus rhythm at 110 bpm with Q waves in the anterior leads. An echocardiogram shows decreased wall motion of the anterior wall of the heart and an estimated ejection fraction of 25%. She is diagnosed with systolic heart failure, secondary to a silent MI.
1. Discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms that can lead to heart failure.
2. Differentiate between systolic and diastolic heart dysfunction
3. Discuss the causes of the patient’s shortness of breath, awakening in the middle of the night and the need to prop herself up on three pillows. Include pathophysiological mechanisms that causes each of these signs and symptoms.
4. Include two points of teaching for this patient
5. Support your response with at least one current evidence based resource.
6. Students must post a minimum of three times in each graded discussion (see participation guidelines below).
DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Application of Course Knowledge
30
30%
1. Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant, evidence based outside sources, AND
2. Posts are on topic and answer all presented questions which demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic.
3. Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life, AND
4. Decisions are well support ...
1009W MLC Prerequisite Expository Essay NAME ASSIGNMENT.docx
1009W MLC Prerequisite Expository Essay
NAME:
ASSIGNMENT TITLE: MLC Prerequisite Expository Essay DATE:
FACILITATOR:
RATING: UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR
RANGE: 0-39.9 40-69.9 70-89.9 90-100
EARNED:
COGNITIVE LEVEL ATTAINED: Higher levels include characteristics of lower levels
ANALYZING:
Breaking material into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to each other and to
an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing, and attributing.
APPLYING: Carrying out or using a procedure through executing or implementing.
UNDERSTANDING:
Constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting,
exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining.
REMEMBERING: Retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge from long-term memory.
WRITING ASSIGNMENT: Prerequisite Expository Essay
Requirements for this assignment are located in paragraph three of the welcome letter.
Facilitator Comments:
Facilitator Signature:
Learner Comments:
Learner Signature:
Learner: Prerequisite Expository Essay
Instructions:
Learners will prepare an original PEE on the contemporary Army issue facing the Sexual Harassment/Assault Response Prevention (SHARP) program within
their organizations. In your essay, explain two recommendations that might improve the effectiveness of your unit’s SHARP program. In doing so, use your
personal experience and at least three references to support your proposals. This paper must set forth an argument concerning your own experience in this
category. You will write in a clear and concise manner while using correct grammar, sentence structure, and word usage. You must provide a coherent
transition from one topic to the next using the provided rubric as a general guideline. Your essay must be in Times New Roman, 12pt font, double-spaced,
APA 6th edition format without an abstract, tables, charts, etc. The essay must be a minimum of three pages and no longer than five pages in length, not
including the title and reference pages.
General (Topics)
Unsatisfactory
0-3.9 pts
Needs Improvement
4-6.9 pts
Satisfactory
7-8.9 pts
Superior
9-10 pts
Topic Introduction:
20%
The text has an unclear topic
with very few ideas,
concepts, information, etc.;
no thesis statement.
The text focuses on a topic
that informs the reader on
ideas, concepts, and
information, etc.; little to
no thesis statement.
The text focuses on a topic
that informs the reader on
ideas, concepts, information,
etc.; thesis statement is
present but vague.
The text clearly focuses on a topic
that informs the reader on ideas,
concepts, information, etc.;
provides a strong thesis
statement.
Topic Development:
40%
The text provides facts,
definitions, details,
quotations, and examples
that attempt to develop and
explain the topic. The
conclusion merely restates
the development.
The text provid.
3162020 Discussion Question Rubrichttpslmscontent.emb.docx
3/16/2020 Discussion Question Rubric
https://lmscontent.embanet.com/RC/General/MSN/Rubrics/Discussion_Question_Rubric_1.html 1/3
Discussion Question Rubric
Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review
assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total
Points
Quality of
Initial Post
Provides clear examples
supported by course
content and references.
Cites three or more
references, using at least
one new scholarly
resource that was not
provided in the course
materials.
All instruction
requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly
represented, with explanations and
application of knowledge to include
evidence-based practice, ethics, theory,
and/or role. Synthesizes course content
using course materials and scholarly
resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the
discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented
primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas
may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the
subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-
based practice, theory, or role development.
Synthesis of course content is present but missing
depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the
discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly
support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to
evidence-based
practice, theory, or
role development.
Synthesis of course
content is superficial.
Demonstrates
incomplete
understanding of
content and/or
inadequate
preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several
instruction
requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points
40
3/16/2020 Discussion Question Rubric
https://lmscontent.embanet.com/RC/General/MSN/Rubrics/Discussion_Question_Rubric_1.html 2/3
Peer
Response
Post
Offers both supportive
and alternative viewpoints
to the discussion, using
two or more scholarly
references per peer post.
Post provides additional
value to the conversation.
All instruction
requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course
content. Provides clarification and new
information or insight related to the
content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content
and a minimum of one scholarly reference
per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly
reference supports the content in the peer post
without adding new information or insight.
Missing reference from one peer post.
Partially followed instructions regarding number ...
3162020 Discussion Question Rubrichttpslmscontent.emb.docx
3/16/2020 Discussion Question Rubric
https://lmscontent.embanet.com/RC/General/MSN/Rubrics/Discussion_Question_Rubric_1.html 1/3
Discussion Question Rubric
Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review
assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total
Points
Quality of
Initial Post
Provides clear examples
supported by course
content and references.
Cites three or more
references, using at least
one new scholarly
resource that was not
provided in the course
materials.
All instruction
requirements noted.
40 points
Components are accurate and thoroughly
represented, with explanations and
application of knowledge to include
evidence-based practice, ethics, theory,
and/or role. Synthesizes course content
using course materials and scholarly
resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the
discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 points
Components are accurate and mostly represented
primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas
may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the
subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-
based practice, theory, or role development.
Synthesis of course content is present but missing
depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the
discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly
support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 points
Absent application to
evidence-based
practice, theory, or
role development.
Synthesis of course
content is superficial.
Demonstrates
incomplete
understanding of
content and/or
inadequate
preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several
instruction
requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points
40
3/16/2020 Discussion Question Rubric
https://lmscontent.embanet.com/RC/General/MSN/Rubrics/Discussion_Question_Rubric_1.html 2/3
Peer
Response
Post
Offers both supportive
and alternative viewpoints
to the discussion, using
two or more scholarly
references per peer post.
Post provides additional
value to the conversation.
All instruction
requirements noted.
40 points
Evidence of further synthesis of course
content. Provides clarification and new
information or insight related to the
content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content
and a minimum of one scholarly reference
per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 points
Lacks clarification or new information. Scholarly
reference supports the content in the peer post
without adding new information or insight.
Missing reference from one peer post.
Partially followed instructions regarding number.
Final Research Paper DraftIf this video does not load prop
Final Research Paper Draft
If this video does not load properly, it can be accessed by
clicking here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
.
Transcript
This week you will be creating and submitting a draft of your Final Research Paper that is based on the topic you selected from the
Research Paper Guidelines
and from the Final Research Paper Outline from Week Two. Please be sure to review the
Model Research Paper Draft
and
Week Three Assignment Template
to understand the expectations for the assignment this week.
The Final Research Paper Draft must contain the following components:
A title page and a references page (based upon your annotated bibliography).
An introduction that features a thesis statement that is clearly articulated and argumentative and/or analytical. Ideally, the introduction should be a single, compelling paragraph.
Body paragraphs that develop at least one research-supported argument. (Note: The body of your paper should feature in-text citations that leverage at least four different sources.)
APA-style formatting, including properly documented citations.
Your draft must be 750 to 2,000 words in length, excluding the title and references pages. Remember to proofread your work for errors in grammar, mechanics, style, and formatting. Submit as much work as possible, whether it is a full or partial draft. Please refer to
Research Paper Guidelines
as well as Week Five Final Research Paper instructions.
The purpose of the Final Research Paper Draft is to ensure you are making satisfactory progress on your Final Research Paper while providing you with an opportunity to receive direction and feedback from your instructor. If you find that you are struggling to complete the draft, make sure that you have read and reviewed this week’s required activities. Additionally, consider contacting your instructor for additional one-on-one guidance.
Submission Information:
Complete the task above and save the document as a Microsoft Word or PDF file. Submit your assignment via the
Assignment Submission
button. Please use a naming convention for your assignment file that includes your last name, the week number, and the assignment number. So, your Final Research Paper Draft assignment should bear a file name that looks like: smithENG122w3.doc or smithENG122w3.pdf.
Writing specialists are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you!
Click
HERE
to instantly chat with an online tutor.
Click
HERE
to submit your paper for a review. Papers are returned within 24 hours with a revision plan.
Click
HERE
to email us any writing questions.
For additional writing resources like
Grammarly (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
, click on the Writing Center tab in the left navigation pane.
Carefully review the
Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Description
:
Total Po ...
2 Dissertation ProspectusInsert Prospectus Title .docx
2
Dissertation Prospectus
<Insert Prospectus Title >
Submitted by
<Insert Name>
<Insert Submission Date>
<Insert Chair Name>
Prospectus Instructions:
1. Read the entire Prospectus Template to understand the requirements for writing your Prospectus. Each section contains a narrative overview of what should be included in the section and a table with criteria required for each section. These criteria will be used to assess the prospectus for overall quality and feasibility of the proposed research study.
2. As you draft each section, delete the narrative instructions and insert your work related to that section. Use the criteria table for each section to ensure that you address the requirements for that particular section. Do not delete/remove the criteria table as this is used by you and your Committee to evaluate your prospectus.
3. Prior to submitting your prospectus for review by your Chair or Methodologist, use the criteria table for each section to complete a self-evaluation, inserting what you believe is your score for each listed criteria into the Learner Self-Evaluation column.
4. The scoring for the criteria ranges from a 0-3 as defined below. Complete a realistic and thoughtful evaluation of your work. Your Chair and Methodologist will also use the criteria tables to evaluate your work.
5. Your Prospectus should be between 6-10 pages when the tables are deleted.
Score
Assessment
0
Item Not Present
1
Item is Present, But Does Not Meet Expectations: Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions. All items scored at 1 must be addressed by learner per reviewer comments.
2
Item Approaches Meeting Expectations, But Needs Revision: Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Any item scored at 2 must be addressed by the learner per the reviewer comments.
3
Item Meets Expectations: Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. No changes required.
2
Dissertation Prospectus
Introduction
The Prospectus is 6-10 page document that serves as a road map for the dissertation. It provides the essential framework to guide the development of the dissertation proposal. The Prospectus builds on the 10 Strategic Points (shown in Appendix A). The Prospectus will be expanded to become your dissertation proposal (Chapters 1, 2 and 3 of your dissertation), which will in turn, be expanded to become the complete dissertation (Chapters 1-5). Prior to developing the Prospectus, the 10 Strategic Points should be reviewed with the Chair and Committee to ensure the10 Strategic Points are aligned and that you have a clear, defined, and a doable study. Your 10 Strategic Points should be included in Appendix A of this Prospectus document.
The Introduction section broadly describes the research focus that will be addressed by the dissertation and why that focus i ...
Argument Position Essay RubricContent 151051 90 total.docx
Argument Position Essay Rubric
Content
15
10
5
1
90 total
Introduction
Well-developed introduction that engages readers and creates interest. Identifies a compelling, controversial issue/topic
Contains detailed background information on said topic.
Introduction creates interest.
Identifies a controversial issue/topic
Provides some background information.
Needs minor work.
Introduction is adequate, but does not catch the reader’s attention and/or does not clearly set up the purpose of the paper. Needs moderate work.
.
Introduction is inadequate and/or needs major work. Writer does not attempt to create interest. Background details are a random collection of information, unclear, or not related. Introduction is missing.
Thesis Statement
Clear thesis statement that identifies the main reasons that will support the position and direct the reader toward the point of the paper.
Thesis statement is arguable and the writer takes a clear stance.
Clear thesis statement is present, but may be lacking one reason or could be more engaging and/or direct.
Thesis statement is arguable
Thesis is vague and unclear. It requires effort on the part of the reader to discern the point of the paper and the reasons supporting your position.
Thesis is not arguable
Stance is unclear and vague
No thesis present, or thesis is so inadequate that the point of the paper is completely unclear.
Body Paragraphs
Body paragraphs include a topic sentence that connects to thesis and states the main focus of paragraph
Well-developed/relevant examples, details, and evidence.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are relevant and enhance the explanation of the content.
It is clear and focused, demonstrates original thought/reflection/insight. It holds the reader’s attention.
The paper effectively covers the topic.
Body paragraphs support thesis with examples, details, and evidence
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are relevant and adequately explain the content.
It is reasonably clear and focused, and the writer goes beyond the superficial or obvious. It holds the reader’s attention. On the whole, accurate details or clear thoughts are present to support the main idea (reasons).
. It effectively covers the topic.
Topic Sentences are vague and unclear
Body paragraphs offer adequate support to thesis, but examples, details, and support do not go far enough.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are present, but does not enhance and/or explain the content or demonstrate thought/reflection/analysis or specifics.
Lacks full development of ideas.
No topic sentences present
Inadequate number of major points/reasons. Body paragraphs inadequately support the thesis, and examples, details, and quotes are significantly underdeveloped.
The writer’s insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are weak, inadequate, or missing.
. It shows no clear sense of purpose and does not reveal reflection. The text reads like a collection of ...
Media Analysisby Kelechi OnyekwereSubmission date 07-Ju
Media Analysis
by Kelechi Onyekwere
Submission date: 07-Jul-2021 10:31PM (UTC-0400)
Submission ID: 1616968636
File name: oodle_temp_turnitintool_1301193303.Media_Analysis_Onyekwere.docx (17.87K)
Word count: 617
Character count: 3105
1
Hello!
*Revise T
Wordy
*Format citati
1
Review to
CTRL - C
2
*Format citatio
*Develop id
Include evid
*Develop id
*Revise parenthet
Connect to
Revise conclus
3%
SIMILARITY INDEX
3%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
0%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 3%
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches < 3 words
Media Analysis
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
theloraxfilm.wikia.com
Internet Source
QM
QM
FINAL GRADE
1/1
Media Analysis
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
Hello, Kelechi! I enjoyed reading your media
analysis essay. You have a great draft going here
as you've included many specific details and
examples throughout to examine how one part
affects the whole media production.
I've made some rubric-specific notes throughout
for your consideration. For example, you'll need to
clarify your introduction to introduce the film right
from the beginning.
Also, you should revise your thesis a bit as well as
add content throughout. Make sure to use
citations in MLA style as well.
I look forward to reading more of your work,
Kelechi.
JV
PAGE 1
Hello!
My name is J.V. I hope these comments will assist you as you continue to learn about the
writing process. I look forward to reading your work!
*Revise Title* | Format
Here, instead of using the topic of the assignment or a shortened title, you could create a
title which captures the reader's attention. Example:
QM
QM
A narrative essay on a first road trip: Waterfalls and Concrete
A compare and contrast essay: Is One Mode of Technology Better?
A research/argumentative essay: Spyware: What Matters Most
A persuasive letter: Families Should Spend Time Together
What do you think?
Wordy | Language
Wordy:
If you use too many words to describe a relatively minor point, your paper may seem wordy.
In order to be as concise as possible, trim your sentences down and use longer, more
meaningful words. Try to use fewer two- and three-letter words, passive constructions, and
weak verbs such as "seem" and "appear."
Additional Comment
Instead, introduce the film or book you'll be discussing (the Lorax).
*Format citation to meet MLA style | Research
You should punctuate/format your citations correctly (here's a link to MLA In-Text Citations
Basics).
Also, here's an example:
Paraphrase:
...and then the economy would flourish (Smith 45).
Direct quote:
"...and the economy would do well" (Smith 45).
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_in_text_citations_the_basics.html
QM
QM
QM
Or, you'll use part of the name of the article (1-3 words) if there is no author, like this:
("Global Warming" 562).
No page numbers:
("Global Warming").
Always place ...
Similar to Name CourseDateInstructor Expository Essay Outline.docx (19)
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 3 STANCE ESSAYDue Week 10 and worth 230.docx
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 3 STANCE ESSAYDue Week 10 and worth 230.docx
Unit VII Research Paper Draft 3 Follow the directions below for .docx
Unit VII Research Paper Draft 3 Follow the directions below for .docx
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that w.docx
The assignment is to write a paper reflecting on 2-3 topics that w.docx
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
BUSI 443Case Study 3 Instructions Recruiting and Selecting High.docx
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that
Touchstone 2.1 Evaluate a SourceASSIGNMENT For this essay, y.docx
Touchstone 2.1 Evaluate a SourceASSIGNMENT For this essay, y.docx
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
Case study D - Crohns Disease Review the case study and answer .docx
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 1 PERSONAL ESSAYDue Week 3 and worth 10.docx
ENG 115ASSIGNMENT 1 PERSONAL ESSAYDue Week 3 and worth 10.docx
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
Top of Formreviewing the Literature and Theory 1Unsatisfac.docx
NR 507 – Week 3 Discussion PurposeThe purpose of this discus.docx
NR 507 – Week 3 Discussion PurposeThe purpose of this discus.docx
1009W MLC Prerequisite Expository Essay NAME ASSIGNMENT.docx
1009W MLC Prerequisite Expository Essay NAME ASSIGNMENT.docx
3162020 Discussion Question Rubrichttpslmscontent.emb.docx
3162020 Discussion Question Rubrichttpslmscontent.emb.docx
3162020 Discussion Question Rubrichttpslmscontent.emb.docx
3162020 Discussion Question Rubrichttpslmscontent.emb.docx
Final Research Paper DraftIf this video does not load prop
Final Research Paper DraftIf this video does not load prop
2 Dissertation ProspectusInsert Prospectus Title .docx
2 Dissertation ProspectusInsert Prospectus Title .docx
Argument Position Essay RubricContent 151051 90 total.docx
Argument Position Essay RubricContent 151051 90 total.docx
Media Analysisby Kelechi OnyekwereSubmission date 07-Ju
Media Analysisby Kelechi OnyekwereSubmission date 07-Ju
More from roushhsiu
Most women experience their closest friendships with those of th.docx
Most women experience their closest friendships with those of the same sex. Men have suffered more of a stigma in terms of sharing deep bonds with other men. Open affection and connection is not actively encouraged among men. Recent changes in society might impact this, especially with the advent of the meterosexual male. “The meterosexual male is less interested in blood lines, traditions, family, class, gender, than in choosing who they want to be and who they want to be with” (Vernon, 2010, p. 204).
In this week’s reading material, the following philosophers discuss their views on this topic: Simone de Beauvoir, Thomas Aquinas, MacIntyre, Friedman, Hunt, and Foucault. Make sure to incorporate their views as you answer each discussion question. Think about how their views may be similar or different from your own. In at least 250 words total, please answer each of the following, drawing upon your reading materials and your personal insight:
To what extent do you think women still have a better opportunity to forge deeper friendships than men? What needs to change to level the friendship playing field for men, if anything?
How is the role of the meterosexual man helping to forge a new pathway for male friendships?
.
Morgan and Dunn JD have hired you to assist with a case involvin.docx
Morgan and Dunn JD have hired you to assist with a case involving domestic abuse. The evidence is contained on a password-protected laptop that the plaintiff (the wife) indicates will show a pattern of abuse. You have to decide what equipment and software to purchase to assist with the case and safely extract the data from the laptop.
.
Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the gene.docx
Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the general population. Discuss the leading causes of death and illness among Hispanic Americans and the options the Advanced Practice Nurse has to overcome the disparity of healthcare for this population.
The post should be a minimum of 200 words, scholarly written, APA7 formatted, and referenced. Free of plagiarism and gramatical errors. A minimum of 2 references is required (other than your text).
.
Moreno Industries has adopted the following production budget for th.docx
Moreno Industries has adopted the following production budget for the first 4 months of 2013.
Month Units Month Units
January 10,000 March 5,000
February 8,000 April 4,000
Each unit requires 3 pounds of raw materials costing $2 per pound. On December 31, 2012, the ending raw materials inventory was 9,000 pounds. Management wants to have a raw materials inventory at the end of the month equal to 30% of next month's production requirements.
Complete the direct materials purchases budget by month for the first quarter.
.
Most people have a blend of leadership styles that they use. Some le.docx
Most people have a blend of leadership styles that they use. Some leaders are more flexible in applying a wide range of leadership styles, whereas others are more consistent and generally use just one or two preferred behaviors. Consider if two strong individuals begin a new company and discuss the following:
If two diverse individuals, each having a different leadership style, were tasked with effectively co-leading an organization, what potential conflicts might occur between these different leadership styles?
How will their personal leadership styles influence the organizational culture?
How would you recommend that these two leaders work together most effectively?
.
Moral rights as opposed to legal rights are not dependent on a polit.docx
Moral rights as opposed to legal rights are not dependent on a political system for their legitimacy. This is the category of rights that all human air--breathers, as opposed to non-human air-breathers--- should be afforded to them by virtue of their having intrinsic value and not only instrumental value. These rights, or entitlements, are supported by various ethical theories when for instance the Universalism thesis under Utilitarianism requires that all persons' (women's and men's) interests be considered in the calculations of Hedonistic options available. Kantianism insists that all Unverbalizable maxims be respectful of the rights of all persons to be treated with dignity and respect--which includes freedom of choice. Virtue ethics, more modernly, does not distinguish basic "good " character traits of excellence such as integrity, good judgment, role identity--not as a woman or a man in any given role but, the ability to fulfill the duties of that role within a community by a member of either sex---, holism--the ability to habitually practice the other virtues in an integrative manner while recognizing the importance of other persons to the community and vise versa. The various Justice theories do not relegate justice based on sex, just on relevant differences based on ability, endeavor, contribution, etc.
Do current generatons ( including current businesses) owe a duty to future generations to produce products and conduct business in an environmentally sustainable manner so that future generations are assured of inheriting a livable planet( one on which reasonable persons would want to live); even if it means that current generations must sacrifice many preferences in current lifestyles? Why or why not?
First define environmental sustainability (hint: the U.N. has a good definition). Also, the term "future generations" includes all of the yet to be borne, not those that are younger than you but are breathing.
Use the following for your analysis:
1. Kohlberg’s Moral Development Model;
2. The Kew Garden Principles; or Dr. Laura’s Three Prerequisites for Assigning Moral Credit or Culpability;
3. At least two appropriate Ethical Theories
4. Moral Imagination;
5. Moral Courage;
6. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Model;
7. A CSR Model; Needs to be a current CSR model not just the definition
8. The relevant Law or Legal Theory;
9. Any other applicable course concepts from previous or current assigned reading or research
10. Sample paper is just that a sample it doesn't pertain to this topic for analysis
11 additional help
RIGHTS THEORIES
MORAL RIGHTS
Moral rights as opposed to legal rights are not dependant on a political system for their legitimacy. This is the category of rights that all human air--breathers, as opposed to non-human air-breathers--- should be afforded to them by virtue of their having intrinsic value and not only instrumental value. These rights, or.
Montasari, R., & Hill, R. (2019). Next-Generation Digital Forens.docx
Montasari, R., & Hill, R. (2019). Next-Generation Digital Forensics: Challenges and Future Paradigms.
2019 IEEE 12th International Conference on Global Security, Safety and Sustainability (ICGS3), Global Security, Safety and Sustainability (ICGS3)
, 205.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGS3.2019.8688020
Sahinoglu, M., Stockton, S., Barclay, R. M., & Morton, S. (2016). Metrics Based Risk Assessment and Management of Digital Forensics.
Defense Acquisition Research Journal: A Publication of the Defense Acquisition University, 23
(2), 152–177.
https://doi.org/10.22594/dau.16-748.23.02
Nnoli, H. Lindskog, D, Zavarsky, P., Aghili, S., & Ruhl, R. (2012). The Governance of Corporate Forensics Using COBIT, NIST and Increased Automated Forensic Approaches,
2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Conference on Social Computing, Amsterdam
, 734-741.
After reading articles expand on investigation and of digital forensic analysis and investigations. Organizations, especially those in the public, health and educational areas are bound by legal and statutory requirements to protect data and private information, therefore digital forensics analysis will be very beneficial when security breaches do occur. Using this weeks readings and your own research, discuss digital forensics and how it could be used in a risk management program.
Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least two of the following:
Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the instructor
Provide extensive additional information on the topic
Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
Share an applicable personal experience
Provide an outside source that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA 7)
Make an argument concerning the topic.
.
Module Outcome You will be able to describe the historical force.docx
Module Outcome: You will be able to describe the historical forces that have influenced the intersection of race and family in the United States.
Course Outcome: You will be able to describe the historical forces that have influenced the intersection of race and family in the United States.
General Education Competency:
You will have used critical thinking to analyze problems and make logical decisions.
You will be able to demonstrate socialization skills that support cultural awareness and a global perspective.
You will be able to communicate effectively using the conventions of American Standard English in professional and academic environments
What practices did the US government engage in to force Native Americans to assimilate to American culture? What were their motivations? Does this trend continue? Explain. How might this affect the Native American culture in the eyes of Native Americans and non-indigenous Americans alike? Explain.
For a top score, you must respond constructively to at least two other students. More extensive participation will be noted. All of your postings should be spread over three different days.
Introduction: This assignment will assist in your gaining a better understanding of the theoretical perspectives in Sociology
This assignment fulfills/supports
Module Outcome: You will be able to how structural functionalism, conflict perspectives, and symbolic interactionism work together to help us get a more complete view of reality.
Course Outcome: You will be able to recognize and apply the basic sociological terms vital to the understanding of sociology and the major theoretical paradigms to an analysis of social institutions, social structures, and societal issues.
General Education Competency
You will be able to communicate effectively using the conventions of American Standard English in professional and academic environments.
You will be able to demonstrate socialization skills that support cultural awareness and a global perspective.
Demonstrate computer literacy
The Assignment: DF #2 - Theoretical Perspectives
Find a newspaper article, online or physical paper, and identify the structural functionalist, social conflict, and symbolic interctionist view of the social issue that is discussed in the article. Think about how each of these perspectives view society. You can get this from your reading of the text. For example, structural functionalists view society as social harmony with a high degree of social order with the institutions meeting their manifest and latent functions, all for the good of society, compared to conflict theorists, which view society as an arena of social inequality; dominant and subordinate groups, competing for scarce resources. In comparison, a symbolic interactinist may view society based upon symbolic meaning, labeling and social construction and the interaction with others in society.
Prompt:
Write at least one paragraph summarizing your .
Molière believed that the duty of comedy is to correct human vices b.docx
Molière believed that the duty of comedy is to correct human vices by exposing them and mocking them to absurd extreme. He also believed that human behavior should be governed by reason and moderation. In
Tartuffe
, he presents characters who engage in extremely negative behavior driven by passion or emotion rather than reason or common sense. Identify two or three characters who fall into this category and discuss their specific extremely negative behaviors, the consequences of their actions and what that means to you.
.
Module One Making Budgetary DecisionsDirectionsBased on the i.docx
Module One Making Budgetary Decisions
Directions:
Based on the information in the text and the goals and objectives that you have established for the City Bradley Recycling Department, please respond to the following questions in a Word document.
1. Which one of the budgets (line-item, program, performance) best describes what the recycle department does? Explain your answer.
2. Which one of the budgets gives the director of the department/agency, the mayor, and the legislative body, the most discretion/latitude in making decisions about the agency and why? Think about the roles of these persons prior to answering the questions. The response for each entity should be explained separately i.e. Line-Item, Program, Performance).
Rubric Grading you must meet criteria within the 100-90%
PAD 3204 MODULE 1 SUNDAY ASSIGNMENT
PAD 3204 MODULE 1
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of data and assumptions
100.0 pts
You successfully incorporate all assumptions and data from the assignment and include information about average salaries gleaned from the district report card; no apparent errors.
85.0 pts
You incorporate most, if not all, assumptions and data from the assignment and include information about average salaries gleaned from the district report card; one or two minor errors.
75.0 pts
You incorporate some assumptions and data from the assignment and include information about average salaries gleaned from the district report card; a few major errors and omissions.
65.0 pts
You incorporate few, if any, assumptions and data from the assignment; many errors and omissions.
100.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall presentation
100.0 pts
Your discussion of the budget process and individual budget lines is set forth in a clear, thoughtful manner. It is well-written and insightful (writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness); includes thorough details and relevant data and information; and is extremely well-organized.
85.0 pts
Your discussion of the budget process and individual budget lines is set forth in a thoughtful manner. It is well-written (writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors); includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; and is well-organized.
65.0 pts
Your discussion of the budget process and individual budget lines is carelessly written (writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors); gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; and lacks organization.
25.0 pts
Your discussion of the budget process and individual budget lines is poorly written (writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors); lacks detail and relevant data and information; and is poorly organized.
100.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTURNITIN ORIGINALITY SCORE
100.0 pts
<11%
80.0 pts
11% - 15%
70.0 pts
16% - 20%
60.0 pts
21% - 25%
50.0 pts
26% - 30%
.
Monitoring Data and Quality ImprovementAnswer one of two que.docx
Monitoring Data and Quality Improvement
Answer one of two questions below:
Describe and support the use of monitoring in evaluating an organization or the status of a condition as an evaluation tool.
What is the value of collecting, documenting, and monitoring data over time?
Discuss how the lack of monitoring impacts the evaluation of a market based decision? Cite and reference your resources.
Explain how health care organizations use quality improvement techniques to guide decision making? Discuss the challenges organizations encounter in applying quality improvement techniques to guide decision making. Cite and reference your resources.
.
Monitoring Global Supply Chains† Jodi L. Short Prof.docx
Monitoring Global Supply Chains†
Jodi L. Short*
Professor of Law
University of California
Hastings College of the Law
San Francisco, California,
U.S.A
[email protected]
Michael W. Toffel
Professor of Business
Administration
Harvard Business School
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
[email protected]
Andrea R. Hugill
Doctoral Candidate
Harvard Business School
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
[email protected]
Version: July 6, 2015
Forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal
Research Summary
Firms seeking to avoid reputational spillovers that can arise from dangerous, illegal, and
unethical behavior at supply chain factories are increasingly relying on private social auditors to
provide strategic information about suppliers’ conduct. But little is known about what influences
auditors’ ability to identify and report problems. Our analysis of nearly 17,000 supplier audits
reveals that auditors report fewer violations when individual auditors have audited the factory
before, when audit teams are less experienced or less trained, when audit teams are all-male, and
when audits are paid for by the audited supplier. This first comprehensive and systematic
analysis of supply chain monitoring identifies previously overlooked transaction costs and
suggests strategies to develop governance structures to mitigate reputational risks by reducing
information asymmetries in supply chains.
Managerial Summary
Firms reliant on supply chains to manufacture their goods risk reputational harm if the working
conditions in those factories are revealed to be dangerous, illegal, or otherwise problematic.
While firms are increasingly relying on private-sector ‘social auditors’ to assess factory
conditions, little has been known about the accuracy of those assessments. We analyzed nearly
17,000 code-of-conduct audits conducted at nearly 6,000 suppliers around the world. We found
that audits yield fewer violations when the audit team has been at that particular supplier before,
when audit teams are less experienced or less trained, when audit teams are all-male, and when
the audits were paid for by the supplier instead of by the buyer. We describe implications for
firms relying on social auditors and for auditing firms.
Keywords
monitoring, transaction cost economics, auditing, supply chains, corporate social responsibility
† We gratefully acknowledge the research assistance of Melissa Ouellet as well as that of Chris Allen, John Galvin,
Erika McCaffrey, and Christine Rivera. Xiang Ao, Max Bazerman, Shane Greenstein, Jeffrey Macher, Andrew
Marder, Justin McCrary, Morris Ratner, Bill Simpson, and Veronica Villena provided helpful comments. Harvard
Business School’s Division of Research and Faculty Development provided financial support.
* Correspondence to Jodi L. Short, UC Hastings College of the Law, 200 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA,
94102, .
Morality Relativism & the Concerns it RaisesI want to g.docx
Morality Relativism & the Concerns it Raises
“I want to give moral relativism the good spanking it deserves.”
Peter Kreef philosophy professor, Boston College
Does “relativism” need a spanking?2005 new Pope Benedict warned of the “onslaught of moral relativism”He “has characterized it as the major evil. Some observers believe he is taking a stance in the tense cultural wars in the United States.” (NPR radio, 2005)Mormons agree: “moral relativism/militant atheism”Culture wars?
*
Source: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4618049
Defining the Terms: RelativismMoral relativism: morality is purely culturalMoral differences & disagreements are irreconcilableFor example, Inuit Eskimos practice infanticide: one woman had borne 20 children but killed 10 at birth.Eskimos also practice euthanasia: when the elderly become too feeble to travel, they’re left to freeze.Hence, there’s no one universal moral truth for all times, places, peoples and culturesThe only possible good is toleration & mutual respect of pluralistic values
*
James Rachels, “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism” (Fifty Readings, 2nd Ed.), 397.
Defining the Terms: AbsolutismMoral absolutism: there are clear moral truths to govern all ethical issues regardless of situation.Immoral to accept the justifiability of two conflicting positions on any given ethical issueFor example: with this position, it would be unacceptable for Bush (pro-life) to say Eskimo infanticide practices are understandable and permissible among EskimosOr if polygamy or underage marriage is wrong, it is wrong everywhere and at all times.But what is “underage marriage”?
Moral Absolutism and Human KnowledgeName some fields of human knowledge where we deal with facts and have made great progress.Scientific theory must deal with hard dataNo science that claims absolute knowledge;Fallibility is the hallmark of scienceBut fallibility does not mean all theories are equal.Why should ethics be any different?If moral truths are not absolute, why should that prove that all moral values are equal?We can measure progress in science but what about ethics?
Illogic of Extreme Moral RelativismIn extreme relativism, no one can rightly pass judgment on others’ values/social practicesConsider Afghan Taliban Culture & Values:Ban on women's work outside the homeBan on women's presence in radio or televisionBan on women at schools or universitiesEthic of absolute relativism is self-contradictory:If I pass judgment on others for passing any judgment, am I not passing judgment on others?
Relativism with Norms Normative relativism: while cultural values clearly differ, nevertheless there are some general purposes shared by all moral codes.A socially accepted way of regulating conflicts of interests in society to preserve that people and culture with rules shaped by situations to that end. A socially accepted way of regulating conflicts of interests within an individual that can’t be equally satisfied a.
Module 9 content You will perform a history of a cardiac pro.docx
Module 9 content
You will perform a history of a cardiac problem that your instructor has provided you or one that you have experienced, and you will perform a cardiac assessment. You will document your subjective and objective findings, identify actual or potential risks, and submit this in a Word document to the dropbox provided.
.
Module Assessment 4 TANM ApplicationsBUS2 190Last name, Fir.docx
Module Assessment 4: TANM ApplicationsBUS2 190
Last name, First name (Section X)
Last name, First name (Section X)
Last name, First name (Section X)
Last name, First name (Section X)
[Please replace “X” with Section 7, 8, or 9. Delete this before submitting]
PROBLEM A: Casper Geriatric Center (16 pts)
1. Is this a minimization or maximization problem? Explain.
2. Is this a balanced or unbalanced problem? Explain.
3. What is the total capacity of Stations 10J and 6G?
4. What is the total demand for Sections A,C,E and F?
5. What is the value of your optimal solution?
6. In your optimal solution, to which sections and how many trays to each of these sections should location 2L deliver?
7. Where will Section D get its meals? How many from each Station?
8. Aside from the obvious deliveries from the factory to warehouses or warehouses to stores, identify and discuss 2 more scenarios on how the transportation model can be used.
Problem B: Good Stuffing Sausage Company (16 pts)
1. Is this a minimal spanning or shortest route problem? Explain.
2. Explain the differences between minimal spanning and shortest route problems. Give an example where each type of modeling can be used.
3. How many branches are there in this network?
4. How many hours will it take to drive through Nodes 2-4-8? Explain.
5. Which arc takes the longest time to travel?
6. Korina thinks the best route is 1-5-6-10. Do you agree with her? Why or why not?
7. What is the value of your optimal solution?
8. What are the nodes included in your optimal solution?
Problem C: 9-31: NASA Missions ( 13 points)
(Hint – your answers in questions 1, 2 and 3 should be a schedule on which mission specialist should be scheduled to which flight. Provide your explanations for your answers) 13 points
1. Who should be assigned to which flight to maximize ratings?
Name of Mission Specialist
Mission Date
Total Rating:
2. NASA has just been notified that Anderson is getting married in February and has been granted a highly sought publicity tour in Europe that month. (He intends to take his wife and let the trip double as a honeymoon.) How does this change the final schedule? Explain.
Name of Mission Specialist
Mission Date
Total Rating:
Explanation:
3. Certo has complained that he was rated incorrectly on his January missions. Both ratings should be 10s, he claims to the chief, who agrees and re-computes the schedule. Do any changes occur over the schedule set in Question 2? Why or why not?
Name of Mission Specialist
Mission Date
Total Rating:
Explanation:
4. What are the strengths and weaknesses of this approach to scheduling?
Science Laboratory Format
Writers in the field of biology must consider not only the form but the style of writing in biology papers.
As in all fields, there are conventions to follow or typical style formats of the discipline.
Writing in the sciences is concise, yet pr.
Module Assignment Clinical Decision Support SystemsLearning Outcome.docx
Module Assignment: Clinical Decision Support SystemsLearning Outcomes:
Identify trends in nursing that impact the use of Informatics.
Explore the use of informatics in nursing research and how clinical decision support systems impact nursing care.
Analyze leadership and collaborative practice strategies that foster mutual respect and shared decision making.
Questions:
Part 1) Think if a nursing diagnosis that interests you. Then, conduct an internet search using your chosen nursing diagnosis as the search topic. Locate at least three internet resources that pertain to your topic, then review the sites and write a three or four sentence summary of each that includes the following:
Appropriateness of content
Reliability of content (sources cited within site, anecdotal vs. evidence-based practice)
Links included within the website.
Part 2) Locate three internet-based Cancer screening tools that could be included in an HER, such as EPIC or Connect Care
In your own words, how will clinical decision support systems improve outcomes for a patient diagnosed with cancer?
What would be the benefits of including reminders for cancer screening for healthcare providers and to patients (such as the sepsis screening tool that pops up in EPIC or Connect Care)
Rubric
See attached below for instructions detail and Assignment Grading Rubric
.
MONTCLAIR UNIVERSITYLAWS 362 LEGAL WRITING MIDTERM.docx
MONTCLAIR UNIVERSITY
LAWS 362: LEGAL WRITING
MIDTERM EXAM (April 1, 2020)
(8 Pages: You may add extra sheets to wrote on as necessary)
NAME:………………………………………………………………………………………..
SIGNATURE:……………………………………………/ DATE …………………………………..
EXAM PART 1: (20 points)
I) You are working as a law clerk for a New Jersey law firm. Your senior partner is preparing a trial brief on a case which is currently pending before a New Jersey state trial court in Essex County and asks you to research an issue of law for the brief. Your research reveals relevant information from the 10 sources below. After each item, indicate whether the authority is either (1) PRIMARY; (2) PERSUAUSIVE or (3) SECONDARY authority.
A) A published decision from the New Jersey Supreme Court : .
B) A published decision from a Hudson New Jersey trial court : .
C) A 2018 law review article in the Rutgers Law Journal: .
D)A decision from a federal district court in New Jersey .
E) A published decision from the New York Supreme Court: .
F) A Dissenting opinion from the New Jersey Supreme Court: .
G) A published decision from the Minnesota appellate court: .
H) A Concurring opinion from the New Jersey Supreme Court: .
I) A published decision from the New Jersey Appellate Division: .
J) A 2018 article authored by a retired New Jersey Supreme Court Justice and published in the
New Jersey Law Journal: .
EXAM PART 2: (20 Points)
( BRIEFING A CASE )
II) Please read the case (previously provide) of Van Brunt v. Van Brunt and prepare a concise case brief addressing the following 6 points :
1) Identify the Holding:
2) Identify the Issues:
3) Identify the Rule(s) that is/are the subject of the decision :
4) Identify the Key Relevant Facts:
5) Identify the Disposition of the Case:
6) Identify in Logical Detail the Reasons and Policies Behind the Decision:
EXAM PART 3: 20 Points
( BRIEFING A STATUTE )
Please read the following excerpt from the accompanying following New Jersey landlord tenant statute regarding secu.
MODULE 8You will perform a history of a respiratory problem th.docx
MODULE 8
You will perform a history of a respiratory problem that either your instructor has provided you or one that you have experienced and perform a respiratory assessment. You will document your subjective and objective findings, identify actual or potential risks, and submit this in a Word document to the dropbox provided.
.
Most organizations, including hospitals, adopt both Mission and Visi.docx
Most organizations, including hospitals, adopt both Mission and Vision Statements. Both can usually be found posted prominently on the wall, and on the organization's website.
What is the difference between a Mission Statement and a Vision Statement? Why would both statements be important as it relates to strategic planning? Are they important in achieving a competitive advanatgae?
Be specific. Thoroughly explain your response.
.
More like this Abstract TranslateFull Text Translate.docx
More like this
Abstract Translate
Full Text Translate
International law is in a period of transition. After World War
II, but especially since the 1980s, human rights expanded to
almost every corner of international law. In doing so, they
changed core features of international law itself, including
the definition of sovereignty and the sources of international
legal rules. But what has been called the "age of human
rights" is over, at leastfor now. Whether measured in terms of
the increasing number of authoritarian governments, the
decline in international human rights enforcement
architecture such as the Responsibility to Protect and the
Alien Tort Statute, the growing power of China and Russia
over the content of international law, or the rising of
nationalism and populism, international human rights law is
in retreat. The decline offers an opportunity to consider how
human rights changed, or purported to change, international
law and how international law as a whole can be made more
effective in a post-human rights era. This Article is the first to
argue that international human rights law as a whole-
whatever its much disputed benefits for human rights
themselves-appears to have expanded and changed
international law in ways that have made it weaker, less likely
to generate compliance, and more likely to produce
interstate friction and conflict. The debate around
international law and human rights should be reframed to
consider these costs and to evaluate whether international
law, including the work of the United Nations, should focus
on a stronger, more limited core of international legal norms
that protects international peace and security, not human
rights. Human rights could be advanced through domestic
and regional legal systems, through the the development of
non-binding international norms, and through iterative
processes of international reporting and monitoring-a model
not unlike the Paris Climate Agreement.
MoreK
0:00 /0:00
HeadnoteHeadnote
Abstract
International law is in a period of transition. After World War
II, but especially since the 1980s, human rights expanded to
almost every corner of international law. In doing so, they
changed core features of international law itself, including
the definition of sovereignty and the sources of international
legal rules. But what has been called the "age of human
rights" is over, at leastfor now. Whether measured in terms of
the increasing number of authoritarian governments, the
decline in international human rights enforcement
architecture such as the Responsibility to Protect and the
Alien Tort Statute, the growing power of China and Russia
over the content of international law, or the rising of
nationalism and populism, international human rights law is
in retreat.
The decline offers an opportunity to consider how human
rights changed, or purported to change, international law and
how international law as a whole can be mad.
More from roushhsiu (20)
Most women experience their closest friendships with those of th.docx
Most women experience their closest friendships with those of th.docx
Morgan and Dunn JD have hired you to assist with a case involvin.docx
Morgan and Dunn JD have hired you to assist with a case involvin.docx
Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the gene.docx
Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the gene.docx
Moreno Industries has adopted the following production budget for th.docx
Moreno Industries has adopted the following production budget for th.docx
Most people have a blend of leadership styles that they use. Some le.docx
Most people have a blend of leadership styles that they use. Some le.docx
Moral rights as opposed to legal rights are not dependent on a polit.docx
Moral rights as opposed to legal rights are not dependent on a polit.docx
Montasari, R., & Hill, R. (2019). Next-Generation Digital Forens.docx
Montasari, R., & Hill, R. (2019). Next-Generation Digital Forens.docx
Module Outcome You will be able to describe the historical force.docx
Module Outcome You will be able to describe the historical force.docx
Molière believed that the duty of comedy is to correct human vices b.docx
Molière believed that the duty of comedy is to correct human vices b.docx
Module One Making Budgetary DecisionsDirectionsBased on the i.docx
Module One Making Budgetary DecisionsDirectionsBased on the i.docx
Monitoring Data and Quality ImprovementAnswer one of two que.docx
Monitoring Data and Quality ImprovementAnswer one of two que.docx
Monitoring Global Supply Chains† Jodi L. Short Prof.docx
Monitoring Global Supply Chains† Jodi L. Short Prof.docx
Morality Relativism & the Concerns it RaisesI want to g.docx
Morality Relativism & the Concerns it RaisesI want to g.docx
Module 9 content You will perform a history of a cardiac pro.docx
Module 9 content You will perform a history of a cardiac pro.docx
Module Assessment 4 TANM ApplicationsBUS2 190Last name, Fir.docx
Module Assessment 4 TANM ApplicationsBUS2 190Last name, Fir.docx
Module Assignment Clinical Decision Support SystemsLearning Outcome.docx
Module Assignment Clinical Decision Support SystemsLearning Outcome.docx
MONTCLAIR UNIVERSITYLAWS 362 LEGAL WRITING MIDTERM.docx
MONTCLAIR UNIVERSITYLAWS 362 LEGAL WRITING MIDTERM.docx
MODULE 8You will perform a history of a respiratory problem th.docx
MODULE 8You will perform a history of a respiratory problem th.docx
Most organizations, including hospitals, adopt both Mission and Visi.docx
Most organizations, including hospitals, adopt both Mission and Visi.docx
More like this Abstract TranslateFull Text Translate.docx
More like this Abstract TranslateFull Text Translate.docx
Recently uploaded
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
This Presentation in details discusses on Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Polish students' mobility in the Czech Republic
Polish students mobility to the Czech Republic within eTwinning project "Medieval adventures with Marco Polo"
The approach at University of Liverpool.pptx
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI funded books
Wednesday 22 May 2024, 14:00-15:00.
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Event Link:-
https://meetups.mulesoft.com/events/details/mulesoft-mysore-presents-exploring-gemini-ai-and-integration-with-mulesoft/
Agenda
● Java 17 Upgrade Overview
● Why and by when do customers need to upgrade to Java 17?
● Is there any immediate impact to upgrading to Mule Runtime 4.6 and beyond?
● Which MuleSoft products are in scope?
For Upcoming Meetups Join Mysore Meetup Group - https://meetups.mulesoft.com/mysore/
YouTube:- youtube.com/@mulesoftmysore
Mysore WhatsApp group:- https://chat.whatsapp.com/EhqtHtCC75vCAX7gaO842N
Speaker:-
Shubham Chaurasia - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shubhamchaurasia1/
Priya Shaw - https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-shaw
Organizers:-
Shubham Chaurasia - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shubhamchaurasia1/
Giridhar Meka - https://www.linkedin.com/in/giridharmeka
Priya Shaw - https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-shaw
Shyam Raj Prasad-
https://www.linkedin.com/in/shyam-raj-prasad/
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
This ppt include the description of the edible vaccine i.e. a new concept over the traditional vaccine administered by injection.
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
This slide describes the research aptitude of unit 2 in the UGC NET paper I.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptx
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Biological Screening of Herbal Drugs in detailed.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Recently uploaded (20)
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Mule 4.6 & Java 17 Upgrade | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #46
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Adversarial Attention Modeling for Multi-dimensional Emotion Regression.pdf
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Name CourseDateInstructor Expository Essay Outline.docx
- 1. Name: Course: Date: Instructor: Expository Essay: Outline Directions: 1. Please review your Topic 3 readings and the “Planning and Getting Started” section of “The Writing Process” media piece. 2. Fill in the outline and references sections below. Use a minimum of three peer reviewed resources to support your subtopics (one resource per supporting paragraph). Make sure to use complete sentences when completing the outline. Expository Essay Topic: Essay Title: I. Introduction: (Begin with a hook sentence to capture your audience’s attention, then provide a brief background of the topic and end with your thesis statement.) a. Hook: b. Additional background information: c. Mapped Thesis statement (review Topic 3DQ1 for feedback from instructor): II. Support Supporting Point #1 (subtopic 1): ____________________ a. Topic sentence for this first sub-topic:
- 2. b. Two to three paraphrased supporting details from your research with in-text citations · Supporting paraphrase 1: · Supporting paraphrase 2: Supporting Point #2 (subtopic 2): ____________________ a. Topic sentence for this second sub-topic: b. Two to three paraphrased supporting details from your research with in-text citations · Supporting paraphrase 1: · Supporting paraphrase 2: Supporting Point #3 (subtopic 3): ____________________ a. Topic sentence for this third sub-topic: b. Two to three paraphrased supporting details from your research with in-text citations
- 3. · Supporting paraphrase 1: · Supporting paraphrase 2: III. Conclusion: (Paraphrase your thesis statement, summarize main points, and make final remarks.) a. Paraphrase thesis statement: b. Summarize main points: References Organize all references you will use in the essay and list them in the space below in alphabetical order based on author’s last name. Be sure the reference page is double-spaced and formatted to have hanging indents by ½ an inch, with the first line hanging and all others indented. See the GCU Style Guide for help with formatting references and citations. Within the essay, this reference page will be on its own page at the bottom of your essay.
- 4. Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsUNV-104UNV-104-O505Expository Essay Outline100.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (65.00%)Satisfactory (75.00%)Good (85.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent85.0%Explains the Topic Using Researched Factual Information15.0%Does not explain the topic using researched, factual information.Outline does not appropriately use information and research to support body paragraphs.Explains the topic using somewhat vague information, and uses researched and factual information from at least two articles to support body paragraphs with in-text citations and references.Explains the topic using researched, factual information and uses at least two peer-reviewed articles with in-text citations and references.Explains the topic using researched, factual information, uses at least three peer- reviewed resources (one peer-reviewed article per supporting paragraph) to support subtopics and provides in-text citations and references.0.00/0.00Introduction10.0%Introduction omits beginning with a hook sentence, introduces topic, and ends with a thesis statement.Introduction inadequately begins with a hook sentence, introduces topic, and ends with a thesis statement.Introduction adequately begins with a hook sentence, introduces topic, and ends with a thesis statement. Introduction is limited and lacks important details.Introduction clearly begins with a hook sentence, introduces topic, and ends with a thesis statement. Introduction is strong with important
- 5. details.Introduction expertly begins with a hook sentence, introduces topic, and ends with a thesis statement. Introduction is comprehensive and insightful with Important details.0.00/0.00Thesis Development and Purpose20.0%Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive, reflective of the arguments, and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis lists the three subtopic areas that will be discussed within the body paragraphs of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.0.00/0.00Supporting Paragraph 110.0%Topic sentence does not align to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details included are limited and do not include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources are not used. Explanations do not show sound analysis of topic.Topic sentence may or may not align to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details included are limited and may or may not include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources may or may not be used. Explanations show minimal analysis of topic.Topic sentence somewhat aligns to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources are used. Explanations show sound analysis to topic.Topic sentence aligns to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources are used. Explanations show strong, sound analysis to topic.Topic sentence aligns strongly to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources are used. Explanations are comprehensive and show strong, sound analysis to topic.0.00/0.00Supporting Paragraph 210.0%Topic sentence does not align to thesis statement
- 6. subtopic points. Supporting details included are limited and do not include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer- reviewed resources are not used. Explanations do not show sound analysis of topic.Topic sentence may or may not align to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details included are limited and may or may not include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources may or may not be used. Explanations show minimal analysis of topic.Topic sentence somewhat aligns to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources are used. Explanations show sound analysis to topic.Topic sentence aligns to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources are used. Explanations show strong, sound analysis to topic.Topic sentence aligns strongly to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources are used. Explanations are comprehensive and show strong, sound analysis to topic.0.00/0.00Supporting Paragraph 310.0%Topic sentence does not align to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details included are limited and do not include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources are not used. Explanations do not show sound analysis of topic.Topic sentence may or may not align to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details included are limited and may or may not include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources may or may not be used. Explanations show minimal analysis of topic.Topic sentence somewhat aligns to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources are used. Explanations show sound analysis to topic.Topic sentence aligns to thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources are used. Explanations show strong, sound analysis to topic.Topic sentence aligns strongly to
- 7. thesis statement subtopic points. Supporting details include two to three paraphrased complete sentences. Peer-reviewed resources are used. Explanations are comprehensive and show strong, sound analysis to topic.0.00/0.00Conclusion10.0%Omits conclusion which restates the thesis in different words.Inadequately provides conclusion which restates the thesis in different words.Adequately provides conclusion which restates the thesis in different words. Conclusion details are somewhat limitedClearly provides conclusion which restates the thesis in different words. Conclusion details are strong, showing sound analysis.Expertly provides conclusion which restates the thesis in different words. Conclusion details are comprehensive and insightful.0.00/0.00Organization and Effectiveness5.0%Mechanics of Writing (Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.)5.0%Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register); sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Uses of first and second person are found.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used; however, uses of second person are found.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. No uses of first and second person are found.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.0.00/0.00Format10.0%Citations and References: In-text citations and references are in APA Style10.0%Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format
- 8. is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.0.00/0.00Total Weightage100%0.00/100.0