The document presents data on NJASK math scores from 2006 to 2014 for grades 3 through 5 in 12 suburban school districts. It includes line graphs showing average scores by grade over time have generally increased from the 80s/90s to the high 80s, tables listing the exact scores for each district and grade by year, and rankings of districts' scores by grade for selected years. The data shows trends in math scores across districts and grades over the studied period.

1. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 1
NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014
Core Area Grades 3 through 5

2. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 2
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average
Grade 3 91.3% 92.1% 90.3% 84.1% 84.0% 87.1% 87.6% 83.0% 82.1% 86.8%
Grade 4 91.1% 89.4% 88.4% 80.1% 86.9% 86.9% 85.2% 85.2% 82.1% 86.1%
Grade 5 90.8% 90.8% 82.5% 85.0% 87.1% 88.0% 90.5% 86.5% 84.5% 87.3%
NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014
Includes: Bloomingdale, Butler, Kinnelon, Lincoln Park, Oakland, Pequannock,
Pompton Lakes, Ringwood, Riverdale, Wanaque, West Milford, and Wayne
Source: N.J. School Performance Report and U.S. Census Bureau
Suburban Trends Area

3. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 3
School
District Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequannock Pompton Lks Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West Milford
Core Area
Average
2014
Gr. 3 81.0% 81.2% 93.3% 88.9% 81.6% 80.9% 84.9% 84.3% 86.5% 84.3% 67.7% 70.8% 82.1%
Gr. 4 78.2% 88.4% 88.2% 82.5% 89.8% 79.5% 78.0% 84.3% 94.5% 82.4% 57.0% 78.6% 81.8%
Gr. 5 78.5% 88.7% 93.2% 91.3% 87.1% 88.1% 88.6% 85.5% 77.8% 88.0% 59.5% 81.5% 84.0%
2013
Gr. 3 81.0% 86.0% 93.0% 88.0% 81.7% 89.0% 78.1% 80.0% 92.0% 80.0% 65.0% 82.0% 83.0%
Gr. 4 79.9% 79.0% 90.0% 88.0% 76.3% 87.0% 77.4% 89.0% 93.0% 88.0% 85.0% 85.0% 84.8%
Gr. 5 92.7% 91.0% 92.0% 96.0% 88.0% 81.0% 79.8% 86.0% 84.0% 87.0% 82.0% 84.5% 87.0%
2012
Gr. 3 90.0% 75.0% 91.0% 89.8% 90.3% 90.0% 79.0% 91.0% 91.0% 87.2% 85.0% 94.0% 87.8%
Gr. 4 65.0% 93.0% 94.0%
92.0%
82.3% 75.0% 73.0% 94.0% 82.9% 88.5% 77.5% 83.4%
Gr. 5 83.0% 91.0% 96.0% 98.0% 86.3% 90.0% 87.5% 80.0% 96.0% 88.1% 90.0% 92.5% 89.9%
2011
Gr. 3 85.9% 92.0% 95.8% 89.8% 86.9% 86.0% 81.7% 82.5% 82.2% 86.8% 81.3% 92.7% 87.0%
Gr. 4 61.8% 79.5% 94.7% 94.1% 89.2% 91.0% 78.6% 80.6% 92.9% 84.1% 84.7% 86.3% 84.8%
Gr. 5 73.3% 86.3% 94.2% 94.4% 81.2% 97.6% 84.6% 81.9% 89.3% 76.5% 89.7% 92.3% 86.8%
2010
Gr. 3 70.7% 84.6% 89.7% 95.2% 83.1% 88.1% 79.6% 81.9% 68.0% 78.1% 84.1% 91.8% 82.9%
Gr. 4 75.3% 80.7% 89.2% 97.4% 81.4% 97.7% 77.6% 83.4% 82.1% 89.1% 87.8% 89.4% 85.9%
Gr. 5 69.5% 89.0% 95.1% 93.4% 91.2% 90.7% 82.8% 87.0% 87.1% 83.7% 80.9% 77.1% 85.6%
2009
Gr. 3 78.1% 80.7% 83.5% 92.5% 83.5% 95.4% 61.8% 98.5% 86.2% 81.5% 81.0% 80.8% 83.6%
Gr. 4 60.2% 73.0% 75.7% 91.1% 90.7% 88.7% 69.5% 79.4% 84.4% 66.3% 83.8% 78.1% 78.4%
Gr. 5 60.7% 78.3% 92.8% 92.3% 89.8% 93.0% 79.1% 80.6% 88.2% 80.5% 80.0% 80.9% 83.0%
2008
Gr. 3 82.1% 90.8% 94.0% 95.4% 94.8% 92.6% 76.5% 93.8% 95.9% 83.9% 81.6% 94.3% 89.6%
Gr. 4 86.7% 89.6% 95.1% 89.8% 92.4% 97.0% 74.5% 89.9% 83.9% 80.8% 87.7% 91.8% 88.3%
Gr. 5 71.9% 75.4% 92.0% 91.8% 86.4% 86.2% 82.9% 75.5% 76.7% 74.7% 82.1% 83.4% 81.6%
2007
Gr. 3 87.1% 83.8% 99.4% 97.0% 95.8% 97.0% 96.3% 83.4% 90.6% 84.9% 91.7% 93.6% 91.7%
Gr. 4 89.8% 91.0% 92.7% 94.9% 94.9% 90.3% 88.5% 88.9% 87.5% 72.7% 89.8% 91.9% 89.4%
Gr. 5 75.4% 84.5% 98.0% 92.6% 98.4% 93.2% 89.9% 98.4% 89.7% 76.6% 87.9% 89.8% 89.5%
2006
Gr. 3 78.4% 92.7% 92.4% 96.1% 95.5% 96.6% 91.2% 88.3% 86.7% 87.0% 86.6% 91.3% 90.2%
Gr. 4 86.2% 95.0% 93.2% 96.5% 97.1% 91.4% 90.7% 82.6% 93.1% 82.4% 92.2% 87.6% 90.7%
Gr. 5 80.5% 79.6% 98.3% 81.6% 96.9% 92.1% 89.9% 87.5% 96.1% 90.9% 89.9% 96.3% 90.0%
Core Study Area Score Averages 2006-2014
NJASK Math

4. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 4
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
90.2%
90.7%
90.0%
91.7%
89.4%
89.5%
89.6% 88.3%
81.6%
83.6%
78.4%
83.0% 82.9%
85.9% 85.6% 87.0%
84.8%
86.8%
87.8%
83.4%
89.9%
83.0%
84.8%
87.0%
82.1%
81.8%
84.0%
NJASK Math Core Area Averages by Grade

5. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 5
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 93.3% 88.2% 93.2%
2 Lincoln Park 88.9% 82.5% 91.3%
3 Riverdale 86.5% 94.5% 77.8%
4 Pompton Lks 84.9% 78.0% 88.6%
5 Ringwood 84.3% 84.3% 85.5%
6 Wanaque 84.3% 82.4% 88.0%
7 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1%
8 Butler 81.2% 88.4% 88.7%
9 Bloomingdale 81.0% 78.2% 78.5%
10 Pequannock 80.9% 79.5% 88.1%
11 West Milford 70.8% 78.6% 81.5%
12 Wayne 67.7% 57.0% 59.5%
2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 93.0% 90.0% 92.0%
2 Riverdale 92.0% 93.0% 84.0%
3 Pequannock 89.0% 87.0% 81.0%
4 Lincoln Park 88.0% 88.0% 96.0%
5 Butler 86.0% 79.0% 91.0%
6 West Milford 82.0% 85.0% 84.5%
7 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0%
8 Bloomingdale 81.0% 79.9% 92.7%
9 Ringwood 80.0% 89.0% 86.0%
10 Wanaque 80.0% 88.0% 87.0%
11 Pompton Lks 78.1% 77.4% 79.8%
12 Wayne 65.0% 85.0% 82.0%
2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 West Milford 94.0% 77.5% 92.5%
2 Kinnelon 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%
3 Ringwood 91.0% 80.0%
4 Riverdale 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%
5 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3%
6 Bloomingdale 90.0% 65.0% 83.0%
7 Pequannock 90.0% 75.0% 90.0%
8 Lincoln Park 89.8% 92.0% 98.0%
9 Wanaque 87.2% 82.9% 88.1%
10 Wayne 85.0% 88.5% 90.0%
11 Pompton Lks 79.0% 73.0% 87.5%
12 Butler 75.0% 93.0% 91.0%
2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 95.8% 94.7% 94.2%
2 West Milford 92.7% 86.3% 92.3%
3 Butler 92.0% 79.5% 86.3%
4 Lincoln Park 89.8% 94.1% 94.4%
5 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2%
6 Wanaque 86.8% 84.1% 76.5%
7 Pequannock 86.0% 91.0% 97.6%
8 Bloomingdale 85.9% 61.8% 73.3%
9 Ringwood 82.5% 80.6% 81.9%
10 Riverdale 82.2% 92.9% 89.3%
11 Pompton Lks 81.7% 78.6% 84.6%
12 Wayne 81.3% 84.7% 89.7%
2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Lincoln Park 95.2% 97.4% 93.4%
2 West Milford 91.8% 89.4% 77.1%
3 Kinnelon 89.7% 89.2% 95.1%
4 Pequannock 88.1% 97.7% 90.7%
5 Butler 84.6% 80.7% 89.0%
6 Wayne 84.1% 87.8% 80.9%
7 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2%
8 Ringwood 81.9% 83.4% 87.0%
9 Pompton Lks 79.6% 77.6% 82.8%
10 Wanaque 78.1% 89.1% 83.7%
11 Bloomingdale 70.7% 75.3% 69.5%
12 Riverdale 68.0% 82.1% 87.1%
2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Ringwood 98.5% 79.4% 80.6%
2 Pequannock 95.4% 88.7% 93.0%
3 Lincoln Park 92.5% 91.1% 92.3%
4 Riverdale 86.2% 84.4% 88.2%
5 Kinnelon 83.5% 75.7% 92.8%
6 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8%
7 Wanaque 81.5% 66.3% 80.5%
8 Wayne 81.0% 83.8% 80.0%
9 West Milford 80.8% 78.1% 80.9%
10 Butler 80.7% 73.0% 78.3%
11 Bloomingdale 78.1% 60.2% 60.7%
12 Pompton Lks 61.8% 69.5% 79.1%
2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Riverdale 95.9% 83.9% 76.7%
2 Lincoln Park 95.4% 89.8% 91.8%
3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4%
4 West Milford 94.3% 91.8% 83.4%
5 Kinnelon 94.0% 95.1% 92.0%
6 Ringwood 93.8% 89.9% 75.5%
7 Pequannock 92.6% 97.0% 86.2%
8 Butler 90.8% 89.6% 75.4%
9 Wanaque 83.9% 80.8% 74.7%
10 Bloomingdale 82.1% 86.7% 71.9%
11 Wayne 81.6% 87.7% 82.1%
12 Pompton Lks 76.5% 74.5% 82.9%
2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 99.4% 92.7% 98.0%
2 Lincoln Park 97.0% 94.9% 92.6%
3 Pequannock 97.0% 90.3% 93.2%
4 Pompton Lks 96.3% 88.5% 89.9%
5 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4%
6 West Milford 93.6% 91.9% 89.8%
7 Wayne 91.7% 89.8% 87.9%
8 Riverdale 90.6% 87.5% 89.7%
9 Bloomingdale 87.1% 89.8% 75.4%
10 Wanaque 84.9% 72.7% 76.6%
11 Butler 83.8% 91.0% 84.5%
12 Ringwood 83.4% 88.9% 98.4%
2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Pequannock 96.6% 91.4% 92.1%
2 Lincoln Park 96.1% 96.5% 81.6%
3 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9%
4 Butler 92.7% 95.0% 79.6%
5 Kinnelon 92.4% 93.2% 98.3%
6 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3%
7 Pompton Lks 91.2% 90.7% 89.9%
8 Ringwood 88.3% 82.6% 87.5%
9 Wanaque 87.0% 82.4% 90.9%
10 Riverdale 86.7% 93.1% 96.1%
11 Wayne 86.6% 92.2% 89.9%
12 Bloomingdale 78.4% 86.2% 80.5%
NJASK Core Area Math Rankings by Year - Grade 3

6. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 6
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Riverdale 86.5% 94.5% 77.8%
2 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1%
3 Butler 81.2% 88.4% 88.7%
4 Kinnelon 93.3% 88.2% 93.2%
5 Ringwood 84.3% 84.3% 85.5%
6 Lincoln Park 88.9% 82.5% 91.3%
7 Wanaque 84.3% 82.4% 88.0%
8 Pequannock 80.9% 79.5% 88.1%
9 West Milford 70.8% 78.6% 81.5%
10 Bloomingdale 81.0% 78.2% 78.5%
11 Pompton Lks 84.9% 78.0% 88.6%
12 Wayne 67.7% 57.0% 59.5%
2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Riverdale 92.0% 93.0% 84.0%
2 Kinnelon 93.0% 90.0% 92.0%
3 Ringwood 80.0% 89.0% 86.0%
4 Lincoln Park 88.0% 88.0% 96.0%
5 Wanaque 80.0% 88.0% 87.0%
6 Pequannock 89.0% 87.0% 81.0%
7 Wayne 65.0% 85.0% 82.0%
8 West Milford 82.0% 85.0% 84.5%
9 Bloomingdale 81.0% 79.9% 92.7%
10 Butler 86.0% 79.0% 91.0%
11 Pompton Lks 78.1% 77.4% 79.8%
12 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0%
2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%
2 Riverdale 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%
3 Butler 75.0% 93.0% 91.0%
4 Lincoln Park 89.8% 92.0% 98.0%
5 Wayne 85.0% 88.5% 90.0%
6 Wanaque 87.2% 82.9% 88.1%
7 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3%
8 West Milford 94.0% 77.5% 92.5%
9 Pequannock 90.0% 75.0% 90.0%
10 Pompton Lks 79.0% 73.0% 87.5%
11 Bloomingdale 90.0% 65.0% 83.0%
12 Ringwood 91.0% 80.0%
2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 95.8% 94.7% 94.2%
2 Lincoln Park 89.8% 94.1% 94.4%
3 Riverdale 82.2% 92.9% 89.3%
4 Pequannock 86.0% 91.0% 97.6%
5 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2%
6 West Milford 92.7% 86.3% 92.3%
7 Wayne 81.3% 84.7% 89.7%
8 Wanaque 86.8% 84.1% 76.5%
9 Ringwood 82.5% 80.6% 81.9%
10 Butler 92.0% 79.5% 86.3%
11 Pompton Lks 81.7% 78.6% 84.6%
12 Bloomingdale 85.9% 61.8% 73.3%
2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Pequannock 88.1% 97.7% 90.7%
2 Lincoln Park 95.2% 97.4% 93.4%
3 West Milford 91.8% 89.4% 77.1%
4 Kinnelon 89.7% 89.2% 95.1%
5 Wanaque 78.1% 89.1% 83.7%
6 Wayne 84.1% 87.8% 80.9%
7 Ringwood 81.9% 83.4% 87.0%
8 Riverdale 68.0% 82.1% 87.1%
9 Oakland
83.1%
81.4% 91.2%
10 Butler 84.6% 80.7% 89.0%
11 Pompton Lks 79.6% 77.6% 82.8%
12 Bloomingdale 70.7% 75.3% 69.5%
2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Lincoln Park 92.5% 91.1% 92.3%
2 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8%
3 Pequannock 95.4% 88.7% 93.0%
4 Riverdale 86.2% 84.4% 88.2%
5 Wayne 81.0% 83.8% 80.0%
6 Ringwood 98.5% 79.4% 80.6%
7 West Milford 80.8% 78.1% 80.9%
8 Kinnelon 83.5% 75.7% 92.8%
9 Butler 80.7% 73.0% 78.3%
10 Pompton Lks 61.8% 69.5% 79.1%
11 Wanaque 81.5% 66.3% 80.5%
12 Bloomingdale 78.1% 60.2% 60.7%
2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Pequannock 92.6% 97.0% 86.2%
2 Kinnelon 94.0% 95.1% 92.0%
3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4%
4 West Milford 94.3% 91.8% 83.4%
5 Ringwood 93.8% 89.9% 75.5%
6 Lincoln Park 95.4% 89.8% 91.8%
7 Butler 90.8% 89.6% 75.4%
8 Wayne 81.6% 87.7% 82.1%
9 Bloomingdale 82.1% 86.7% 71.9%
10 Riverdale 95.9% 83.9% 76.7%
11 Wanaque 83.9% 80.8% 74.7%
12 Pompton Lks 76.5% 74.5% 82.9%
2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4%
2 Lincoln Park 97.0% 94.9% 92.6%
3 Kinnelon 99.4% 92.7% 98.0%
4 West Milford 93.6% 91.9% 89.8%
5 Butler 83.8% 91.0% 84.5%
6 Pequannock 97.0% 90.3% 93.2%
7 Bloomingdale 87.1% 89.8% 75.4%
8 Wayne 91.7% 89.8% 87.9%
9 Ringwood 83.4% 88.9% 98.4%
10 Pompton Lks 96.3% 88.5% 89.9%
11 Riverdale 90.6% 87.5% 89.7%
12 Wanaque 84.9% 72.7% 76.6%
2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9%
2 Lincoln Park 96.1% 96.5% 81.6%
3 Butler 92.7%
95.0%
79.6%
4 Kinnelon 92.4% 93.2% 98.3%
5 Riverdale 86.7% 93.1% 96.1%
6 Wayne 86.6% 92.2% 89.9%
7 Pequannock 96.6% 91.4% 92.1%
8 Pompton Lks 91.2% 90.7% 89.9%
9 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3%
10 Bloomingdale 78.4% 86.2% 80.5%
11 Ringwood 88.3% 82.6% 87.5%
12 Wanaque 87.0% 82.4% 90.9%
NJASK Core Area Math Rankings by Year - Grade 4

7. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 7
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 93.3% 88.2% 93.2%
2 Lincoln Park 88.9% 82.5% 91.3%
3 Butler 81.2% 88.4% 88.7%
4 Pompton Lks 84.9% 78.0% 88.6%
5 Pequannock 80.9% 79.5% 88.1%
6 Wanaque 84.3% 82.4% 88.0%
7 Oakland 81.6% 89.8% 87.1%
8 Ringwood 84.3% 84.3% 85.5%
9 West Milford 70.8% 78.6% 81.5%
10 Bloomingdale 81.0% 78.2% 78.5%
11 Riverdale 86.5% 94.5% 77.8%
12 Wayne 67.7% 57.0% 59.5%
2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Lincoln Park 88.0% 88.0% 96.0%
2 Bloomingdale 81.0% 79.9% 92.7%
3 Kinnelon 93.0% 90.0% 92.0%
4 Butler 86.0% 79.0% 91.0%
5 Oakland 81.7% 76.3% 88.0%
6 Wanaque 80.0% 88.0% 87.0%
7 Ringwood 80.0% 89.0% 86.0%
8 West Milford 82.0% 85.0% 84.5%
9 Riverdale 92.0% 93.0% 84.0%
10 Wayne 65.0% 85.0% 82.0%
11 Pequannock 89.0% 87.0% 81.0%
12 Pompton Lks 78.1% 77.4% 79.8%
2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Lincoln Park 89.8% 92.0% 98.0%
2 Kinnelon 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%
3 Riverdale 91.0% 94.0% 96.0%
4 West Milford 94.0% 77.5% 92.5%
5 Butler 75.0% 93.0% 91.0%
6 Pequannock 90.0% 75.0% 90.0%
7 Wayne 85.0% 88.5% 90.0%
8 Wanaque 87.2% 82.9% 88.1%
9 Pompton Lks 79.0% 73.0% 87.5%
10 Oakland 90.3% 82.3% 86.3%
11 Bloomingdale 90.0% 65.0% 83.0%
12 Ringwood 91.0% 80.0%
2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Pequannock 86.0% 91.0% 97.6%
2 Lincoln Park 89.8% 94.1% 94.4%
3 Kinnelon 95.8% 94.7% 94.2%
4 West Milford 92.7% 86.3% 92.3%
5 Wayne 81.3% 84.7% 89.7%
6 Riverdale 82.2% 92.9% 89.3%
7 Butler 92.0% 79.5% 86.3%
8 Pompton Lks 81.7% 78.6% 84.6%
9 Ringwood 82.5% 80.6% 81.9%
10 Oakland 86.9% 89.2% 81.2%
11 Wanaque 86.8% 84.1% 76.5%
12 Bloomingdale 85.9% 61.8% 73.3%
2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 89.7% 89.2% 95.1%
2 Lincoln Park 95.2% 97.4% 93.4%
3 Oakland 83.1% 81.4% 91.2%
4 Pequannock 88.1% 97.7% 90.7%
5 Butler 84.6% 80.7% 89.0%
6 Riverdale 68.0% 82.1% 87.1%
7 Ringwood 81.9% 83.4% 87.0%
8 Wanaque 78.1% 89.1% 83.7%
9 Pompton Lks 79.6% 77.6% 82.8%
10 Wayne 84.1% 87.8% 80.9%
11 West Milford 91.8% 89.4% 77.1%
12 Bloomingdale 70.7% 75.3% 69.5%
2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Pequannock 95.4% 88.7% 93.0%
2 Kinnelon 83.5% 75.7% 92.8%
3 Lincoln Park 92.5% 91.1% 92.3%
4 Oakland 83.5% 90.7% 89.8%
5 Riverdale 86.2% 84.4% 88.2%
6 West Milford 80.8% 78.1% 80.9%
7 Ringwood 98.5% 79.4% 80.6%
8 Wanaque 81.5% 66.3% 80.5%
9 Wayne 81.0% 83.8% 80.0%
10 Pompton Lks 61.8% 69.5% 79.1%
11 Butler 80.7% 73.0% 78.3%
12 Bloomingdale 78.1% 60.2% 60.7%
2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 94.0% 95.1% 92.0%
2 Lincoln Park 95.4% 89.8% 91.8%
3 Oakland 94.8% 92.4% 86.4%
4 Pequannock 92.6% 97.0% 86.2%
5 West Milford 94.3% 91.8% 83.4%
6 Pompton Lks 76.5% 74.5% 82.9%
7 Wayne 81.6% 87.7% 82.1%
8 Riverdale 95.9% 83.9% 76.7%
9 Ringwood 93.8% 89.9% 75.5%
10 Butler 90.8% 89.6% 75.4%
11 Wanaque 83.9% 80.8% 74.7%
12 Bloomingdale 82.1% 86.7% 71.9%
2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Ringwood 83.4% 88.9% 98.4%
2 Oakland 95.8% 94.9% 98.4%
3 Kinnelon 99.4% 92.7% 98.0%
4 Pequannock 97.0% 90.3% 93.2%
5 Lincoln Park 97.0% 94.9% 92.6%
6 Pompton Lks 96.3% 88.5% 89.9%
7 West Milford 93.6% 91.9% 89.8%
8 Riverdale 90.6% 87.5% 89.7%
9 Wayne 91.7% 89.8% 87.9%
10 Butler 83.8% 91.0% 84.5%
11 Wanaque 84.9% 72.7% 76.6%
12 Bloomingdale 87.1% 89.8% 75.4%
2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 92.4% 93.2% 98.3%
2 Oakland 95.5% 97.1% 96.9%
3 West Milford 91.3% 87.6% 96.3%
4 Riverdale 86.7% 93.1% 96.1%
5 Pequannock 96.6% 91.4% 92.1%
6 Wanaque 87.0% 82.4% 90.9%
7 Pompton Lks 91.2% 90.7% 89.9%
8 Wayne 86.6% 92.2% 89.9%
9 Ringwood 88.3% 82.6% 87.5%
10 Lincoln Park 96.1% 96.5% 81.6%
11 Bloomingdale 78.4% 86.2% 80.5%
12 Butler 92.7% 95.0% 79.6%
NJASK Core Area Math Rankings by Year - Grade 5

8. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 8
2014 Kinnelon 93.3% 2014 Riverdale 94.5% 2014 Kinnelon 93.2%
2013 Kinnelon 93.0% 2013 Riverdale 93.0% 2013 Lincoln Park 96.0%
2012 West Milford 94.0% 2012 Kinnelon 94.0% 2012 Lincoln Park 98.0%
2011 Kinnelon 95.8% 2011 Kinnelon 94.7% 2011 Pequannock 97.6%
2010 Lincoln Park 95.2% 2010 Pequannock 97.7% 2010 Kinnelon 95.1%
2009 Ringwood 98.5% 2009 Lincoln Park 91.1% 2009 Pequannock 93.0%
2008 Riverdale 95.9% 2008 Pequannock 97.0% 2008 Kinnelon 92.0%
2007 Kinnelon 99.4% 2007 Oakland 94.9% 2007 Ringwood 98.4%
2006 Pequannock 96.6% 2006 Oakland 97.1% 2006 Kinnelon 98.3%
Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking Grade 4 - First Place Ranking Grade 5 - First Place Ranking
89.0%
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
100.0%
KinnelonKinnelonWest
Milford
KinnelonLincoln ParkRingwoodRiverdaleKinnelonPequannock
201420132012201120102009200820072006
93.3%
93.0%
94.0%
95.8%
95.2%
98.5%
95.9%
99.4%
96.6%
Core Area
Grade 3 First Place Math Rankings
2006-2014
86.0%
87.0%
88.0%
89.0%
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
100.0%
Riverdale Riverdale Kinnelon Kinnelon Pequannock Lincoln Park Pequannock Oakland Oakland
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
94.5%
93.0%
94.0%
94.7%
97.7%
91.1%
97.0%
94.9%
97.1%
Core Area
Grade 4 First Place Math Rankings
2006-2014
88.0%
89.0%
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
100.0%
Kinnelon Lincoln Park Lincoln Park Pequannock Kinnelon Pequannock Kinnelon Ringwood Kinnelon
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
93.2%
96.0%
98.0%
97.6%
95.1%
93.0%
92.0%
98.4% 98.3%
Core Area
Grade 5 First Place Math Rankings
2006-2014
NJASK Core Study Area Math First-Place Rankings by Year

9. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 9
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
2006
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2007
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2008
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2009
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2010
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2011
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2012
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2013
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2014
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
0.0%
0.4%0.4% 0.5%
0.1%
-2.6%
0.8%
0.3%
3.1%
2.8%
1.8%
1.3%
5.8%
6.0%
3.6%
5.2%
4.6%
5.5%
3.0%
3.9%
5.9%
1.2%
3.6%
4.3%
0.4%0.4%
1.7%
NJASK Core Study Area Math Score Changes by Percent

10. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 10
-25.0%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
2014
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2013
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2012
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2011
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2010
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2009
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2008
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2007
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2006
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
Comparison of Core Study Area
NJASK Math Score Changes by Percent
Bloomingdale
Butler
Kinnelon
Lincoln Park
Oakland
Pequanock
Pompton Lakes
Ringwood
Riverdale
Wanaque
Wayne
West Milford

11. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 11
2014 Gr. 3
1 Kinnelon 11.3%
2 Lincoln Park 6.9%
3 Riverdale 4.5%
4 Oakland 3.0%
5
Pompton
Lakes 2.9%
6 Ringwood 2.3%
7 Wanaque 2.2%
8 Butler -0.8%
9 Bloomingdale -1.0%
10 Pequanock -1.1%
11 West Milford -11.2%
12 Wayne -14.3%
2013 Gr. 3
1 Kinnelon 11.0%
2 Riverdale 10.0%
3 Pequanock 7.0%
4 Lincoln Park 6.0%
5 Butler 4.0%
6 Oakland 2.0%
7 West Milford 0.0%
8 Bloomingdale -1.0%
9 Ringwood -2.0%
10 Wanaque -2.0%
11
Pompton
Lakes -3.9%
12 Wayne -17.0%
2012 Gr. 3
1 West Milford 9.3%
2 Kinnelon 6.3%
3 Ringwood 6.3%
4 Riverdale 6.3%
5 Bloomingdale 5.3%
6 Pequanock 5.3%
7 Lincoln Park 5.1%
8 Oakland 4.3%
9 Wanaque 2.5%
10 Wayne 0.3%
11
Pompton
Lakes -5.7%
12 Butler -9.7%
2011 Gr. 3
1 Oakland 13.9%
2 Kinnelon 13.2%
3 West Milford 10.1%
4 Butler 9.4%
5 Lincoln Park 7.2%
6 Wanaque 4.2%
7 Pequanock 3.4%
8 Bloomingdale 3.3%
9 Ringwood -0.1%
10 Riverdale -0.4%
11
Pompton
Lakes -0.9%
12 Wayne -1.3%
2010 Gr. 3
1 Lincoln Park 17.7%
2 West Milford 14.3%
3 Kinnelon 12.2%
4 Pequanock 10.6%
5 Oakland 10.0%
6 Butler 7.1%
7 Wayne 6.6%
8 Ringwood 4.4%
9
Pompton
Lakes 2.1%
10 Wanaque 0.6%
11 Bloomingdale -6.8%
12 Riverdale -9.5%
2009 Gr. 3
1 Ringwood 17.4%
2 Pequanock 14.3%
3 Lincoln Park 11.4%
4 Oakland 5.2%
5 Riverdale 5.1%
6 Kinnelon 2.4%
7 Wanaque 0.4%
8 Wayne -0.1%
9 West Milford -0.3%
10 Butler -0.4%
11 Bloomingdale -3.0%
12
Pompton
Lakes -19.3%
2008 Gr. 3
1 Riverdale 5.8%
2
Pompton
Lakes 5.4%
3 Lincoln Park 5.3%
4 West Milford 4.2%
5 Kinnelon 3.9%
6 Ringwood 3.7%
7 Pequanock 2.5%
8 Oakland 0.8%
9 Butler 0.7%
10 Wanaque -6.3%
11 Bloomingdale -8.0%
12 Wayne -8.5%
2007 Gr. 3
1 Kinnelon 8.0%
2 Oakland 6.3%
3 Pequanock 5.6%
4 Lincoln Park 5.6%
5
Pompton
Lakes 4.9%
6 West Milford 2.2%
7 Wayne 0.3%
8 Riverdale -0.8%
9 Bloomingdale -4.3%
10 Wanaque -6.5%
11 Butler -7.6%
12 Ringwood -8.0%
2006 Gr. 3
1 Oakland 9.4%
2 Pequanock 6.0%
3 Lincoln Park 5.5%
4 Butler 2.1%
5 Kinnelon 1.8%
6 West Milford 0.7%
7
Pompton
Lakes 0.6%
8 Ringwood -2.3%
9 Wanaque -3.7%
10 Riverdale -3.9%
11 Wayne -4.1%
12 Bloomingdale -12.2%
NJASK Core Area Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 3

12. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 12
2014 Gr. 4
1 Riverdale 13.6%
2 Butler 7.5%
3 Kinnelon 7.3%
4 Ringwood 3.4%
5 Oakland 3.3%
6 Lincoln Park 1.6%
7 Wanaque 1.5%
8 Pequanock -1.4%
9 West Milford -2.3%
10 Bloomingdale -2.7%
11
Pompton
Lakes -2.9%
12 Wayne -23.9%
2013 Gr. 4
1 Riverdale 11.1%
2 Kinnelon 8.1%
3 Ringwood 7.1%
4 Lincoln Park 6.1%
5 Wanaque 6.1%
6 Pequanock 5.1%
7 Wayne 3.1%
8 Oakland 3.1%
9 West Milford 3.1%
10 Bloomingdale -2.0%
11 Butler -2.9%
12
Pompton
Lakes -4.6%
2012 Gr. 4
1 Oakland 14.4%
2 Kinnelon 13.4%
3 Riverdale 13.4%
4 Butler 12.4%
5 Lincoln Park 11.4%
6 Wayne 7.9%
7 Wanaque 2.2%
8 West Milford -3.1%
9 Pequanock -5.6%
10
Pompton
Lakes -7.6%
11 Bloomingdale -15.6%
12 Ringwood
2011 Gr. 4
1 Kinnelon 14.1%
2 Lincoln Park 13.5%
3 Oakland 12.7%
4 Riverdale 12.3%
5 Pequanock 10.4%
6 West Milford 5.7%
7 Wayne 4.1%
8 Wanaque 3.5%
9 Ringwood 0.0%
10 Butler -1.1%
11
Pompton
Lakes -2.0%
12 Bloomingdale -18.8%
2010 Gr. 4
1 Pequanock 17.3%
2 Lincoln Park 17.0%
3 West Milford 9.0%
4 Kinnelon 8.8%
5 Wanaque 8.7%
6 Wayne 7.4%
7 Oakland 6.6%
8 Ringwood 3.0%
9 Riverdale 1.7%
10 Butler 0.3%
11
Pompton
Lakes -2.8%
12 Bloomingdale -5.1%
2009 Gr. 4
1 Lincoln Park 14.5%
2 Oakland 14.3%
3 Pequanock 12.1%
4 Riverdale 7.8%
5 Wayne 7.2%
6 Ringwood 2.8%
7 West Milford 1.5%
8 Kinnelon -0.9%
9 Butler -3.6%
10
Pompton
Lakes -7.1%
11 Wanaque -10.3%
12 Bloomingdale -16.4%
2008 Gr. 4
1 Pequanock 9.1%
2 Kinnelon 7.2%
3 West Milford 3.9%
4 Oakland 3.2%
5 Ringwood 2.0%
6 Lincoln Park 1.9%
7 Butler 1.7%
8 Wayne -0.2%
9 Bloomingdale -1.2%
10 Riverdale -4.0%
11 Wanaque -7.1%
12
Pompton
Lakes -13.6%
2007 Gr. 4
1 Oakland 8.2%
2 Lincoln Park 5.3%
3 Kinnelon 3.1%
4 West Milford 2.3%
5 Butler 1.4%
6 Pequanock 0.7%
7 Bloomingdale 0.2%
8 Wayne 0.2%
9 Ringwood -0.7%
10
Pompton
Lakes -1.1%
11 Riverdale -2.1%
12 Wanaque -16.9%
2006 Gr. 4
1 Lincoln Park 6.6%
2 Butler 5.1%
3 Kinnelon 3.3%
4 Riverdale 3.2%
5 Oakland 2.8%
6 Wayne 2.3%
7 Pequanock 1.5%
8
Pompton
Lakes 0.7%
9 West Milford -2.3%
10 Bloomingdale -3.7%
11 Ringwood -7.3%
12 Wanaque -7.5%
NJASK Core Area Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 4

13. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 13
NJASK Core Area Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 5
2014 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 10.9%
2 Lincoln Park 9.0%
3 Butler 6.4%
4
Pompton
Lakes 6.3%
5 Pequanock 5.8%
6 Wanaque 5.7%
7 Oakland 5.2%
8 Ringwood 3.2%
9 West Milford -0.8%
10 Bloomingdale -3.8%
11 Riverdale -4.5%
12 Wayne -22.8%
2013 Gr. 5
1 Lincoln Park 13.1%
2 Bloomingdale 9.8%
3 Kinnelon 9.1%
4 Butler 8.1%
5 Oakland 7.1%
6 Wanaque 4.1%
7 Ringwood 3.1%
8 West Milford 1.6%
9 Riverdale 1.1%
10 Wayne -0.9%
11 Pequanock -1.9%
12
Pompton
Lakes -3.1%
2012 Gr. 5
1 Lincoln Park 13.7%
2 Kinnelon 11.7%
3 Riverdale 11.7%
4 West Milford 8.2%
5 Butler 6.7%
6 Oakland 6.7%
7 Pequanock 5.7%
8 Wayne 5.7%
9 Wanaque 3.7%
10
Pompton
Lakes 3.2%
11 Bloomingdale -1.3%
12 Ringwood -4.3%
2011 Gr. 5
1 Pequanock 15.7%
2 Lincoln Park 12.5%
3 Kinnelon 12.3%
4 West Milford 10.4%
5 Wayne 7.8%
6 Riverdale 7.4%
7 Oakland 7.0%
8 Butler 4.4%
9
Pompton
Lakes 2.6%
10 Ringwood 0.0%
11 Wanaque -5.4%
12 Bloomingdale -8.6%
2010 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 12.9%
2 Oakland 12.4%
3 Lincoln Park 11.2%
4 Pequanock 8.4%
5 Butler 6.7%
6 Riverdale 4.8%
7 Ringwood 4.7%
8 Wanaque 1.4%
9
Pompton
Lakes 0.5%
10 Wayne -1.4%
11 West Milford -5.2%
12 Bloomingdale -12.8%
2009 Gr. 5
1 Pequanock 12.0%
2 Kinnelon 11.8%
3 Lincoln Park 11.3%
4 Riverdale 7.2%
5 Oakland 0.8%
6 West Milford -0.1%
7 Ringwood -0.4%
8 Wanaque -0.5%
9 Wayne -1.0%
10
Pompton
Lakes -1.9%
11 Butler -2.7%
12 Bloomingdale -20.3%
2008 Gr. 5
1 Oakland 15.0%
2 Kinnelon 14.5%
3 Lincoln Park 14.3%
4 Pequanock 8.7%
5 West Milford 5.9%
6 Wayne 4.6%
7 Riverdale -0.8%
8 Ringwood -2.0%
9 Butler -2.1%
10 Wanaque -2.8%
11 Bloomingdale -5.6%
12
Pompton
Lakes -13.4%
2007 Gr. 5
1 Ringwood 6.5%
2 Kinnelon 6.1%
3 Oakland 3.4%
4 Pequanock 1.3%
5 Lincoln Park 0.7%
6
Pompton
Lakes -2.0%
7 West Milford -2.1%
8 Riverdale -2.2%
9 Wayne -4.0%
10 Butler -7.4%
11 Wanaque -15.3%
12 Bloomingdale -16.5%
2006 Gr. 5
1 Kinnelon 8.7%
2 Oakland 7.2%
3 West Milford 6.8%
4 Riverdale 6.5%
5 Pequanock 2.5%
6 Wanaque 1.3%
7
Pompton
Lakes 0.3%
8 Wayne 0.3%
9 Ringwood -2.1%
10 Lincoln Park -8.0%
11 Bloomingdale -9.1%
12 Butler -10.0%

14. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 14
Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking
2014 Kinnelon 11.3%
2013 Kinnelon 11.0%
2012 West Milford 9.3%
2011 Oakland 13.9%
2010 Lincoln Park 17.7%
2009 Ringwood 17.4%
2008 Riverdale 5.8%
2007 Kinnelon 8.0%
2006 Oakland 9.4%
2014 Riverdale 13.6%
2013 Riverdale 11.1%
2012 Oakland 14.4%
2011 Kinnelon 14.1%
2010 Pequanock 17.3%
2009 Lincoln Park 14.5%
2008 Pequanock 9.1%
2007 Oakland 8.2%
2006 Lincoln Park 6.6%
Grade 4- First-Place Ranking Grade 5 - First-Place Ranking
2014 Kinnelon 10.9%
2013 Lincoln Park 13.1%
2012 Lincoln Park 13.7%
2011 Pequanock 15.7%
2010 Kinnelon 12.9%
2009 Pequanock 12.0%
2008 Oakland 15.0%
2007 Ringwood 6.5%
2006 Kinnelon 8.7%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
16.0%
17.0%
18.0%
KinnelonKinnelonWest
Milford
OaklandLincoln
Park
RingwoodRiverdaleKinnelonOakland
201420132012201120102009200820072006
11.3%11.0%
9.3%
13.9%
17.7%17.4%
5.8%
8.0%
9.4%
Core Area
Grade 3 First Place Math Percentage Rankings
2006-2014
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
16.0%
17.0%
18.0%
RiverdaleRiverdaleOaklandKinnelonPequanockLincoln
Park
PequanockOaklandLincoln
Park
201420132012201120102009200820072006
13.6%
11.1%
14.4%14.1%
17.3%
14.5%
9.1%
8.2%
6.6%
Core Area
Grade 4 First Place Math Percentage Rankings
2006-2014
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
KinnelonLincoln
Park
Lincoln
Park
PequanockKinnelonPequanockOaklandRingwoodKinnelon
201420132012201120102009200820072006
10.9%
13.1%13.7%15.7%12.9%12.0%15.0%
6.5%
8.7%
Core Area
Grade 5 First Place Math Percentage Rankings
2006-2014
NJASK Core Area First-Place Math Rankings by Percentage

15. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 15
Bloomingdale Butler Kinnelon Lincoln Park Oakland Pequanock
Pompton
Lakes Ringwood Riverdale Wanaque Wayne West Milford Average
2014
Gr. 3 -1.0% -0.8% 11.3% 6.9% 3.0% -1.1% 2.9% 2.3% 4.5% 2.2% -14.3% -11.2% 0.4%
Gr. 4 -2.7% 7.5% 7.3% 1.6% 3.3% -1.4% -2.9% 3.4% 13.6% 1.5% -23.9% -2.3% 0.4%
Gr. 5 -3.8% 6.4% 10.9% 9.0% 5.2% 5.8% 6.3% 3.2% -4.5% 5.7% -22.8% -0.8% 1.7%
2013
Gr. 3 -1.0% 4.0% 11.0% 6.0% 2.0% 7.0% -3.9% -2.0% 10.0% -2.0% -17.0% 0.0% 1.2%
Gr. 4 -2.0% -2.9% 8.1% 6.1% 3.1% 5.1% -4.6% 7.1% 11.1% 6.1% 3.1% 3.1% 3.6%
Gr. 5 9.8% 8.1% 9.1% 13.1% 7.1% -1.9% -3.1% 3.1% 1.1% 4.1% -0.9% 1.6% 4.3%
2012
Gr. 3 5.3% -9.7% 6.3% 5.1% 4.3% 5.3% -5.7% 6.3% 6.3% 2.5% 0.3% 9.3% 3.0%
Gr. 4 -15.6% 12.4% 13.4% 11.4% 14.4% -5.6% -7.6% 13.4% 2.2% 7.9% -3.1% 3.9%
Gr. 5 -1.3% 6.7% 11.7% 13.7% 6.7% 5.7% 3.2% -4.3% 11.7% 3.7% 5.7% 8.2% 5.9%
2011
Gr. 3 3.3% 9.4% 13.2% 7.2% 13.9% 3.4% -0.9% -0.1% -0.4% 4.2% -1.3% 10.1% 5.2%
Gr. 4 -18.8% -1.1% 14.1% 13.5% 12.7% 10.4% -2.0% 0.0% 12.3% 3.5% 4.1% 5.7% 4.6%
Gr. 5 -8.6% 4.4% 12.3% 12.5% 7.0% 15.7% 2.6% 0.0% 7.4% -5.4% 7.8% 10.4% 5.5%
2010
Gr. 3 -6.8% 7.1% 12.2% 17.7% 10.0% 10.6% 2.1% 4.4% -9.5% 0.6% 6.6% 14.3% 5.8%
Gr. 4 -5.1% 0.3% 8.8% 17.0% 6.6% 17.3% -2.8% 3.0% 1.7% 8.7% 7.4% 9.0% 6.0%
Gr. 5 -12.8% 6.7% 12.9% 11.2% 12.4% 8.4% 0.5% 4.7% 4.8% 1.4% -1.4% -5.2% 3.6%
2009
Gr. 3 -3.0% -0.4% 2.4% 11.4% 5.2% 14.3% -19.3% 17.4% 5.1% 0.4% -0.1% -0.3% 2.8%
Gr. 4 -16.4% -3.6% -0.9% 14.5% 14.3% 12.1% -7.1% 2.8% 7.8% -10.3% 7.2% 1.5% 1.8%
Gr. 5 -20.3% -2.7% 11.8% 11.3% 0.8% 12.0% -1.9% -0.4% 7.2% -0.5% -1.0% -0.1% 1.3%
2008
Gr. 3 -8.0% 0.7% 3.9% 5.3% 0.8% 2.5% 5.4% 3.7% 5.8% -6.3% -8.5% 4.2% 0.8%
Gr. 4 -1.2% 1.7% 7.2% 1.9% 3.2% 9.1% -13.6% 2.0% -4.0% -7.1% -0.2% 3.9% 0.3%
Gr. 5 -5.6% -2.1% 14.5% 14.3% 15.0% 8.7% -13.4% -2.0% -0.8% -2.8% 4.6% 5.9% 3.1%
2007
Gr. 3 -4.3% -7.6% 8.0% 5.6% 6.3% 5.6% 4.9% -8.0% -0.8% -6.5% 0.3% 2.2% 0.5%
Gr. 4 0.2% 1.4% 3.1% 5.3% 8.2% 0.7% -1.1% -0.7% -2.1% -16.9% 0.2% 2.3% 0.1%
Gr. 5 -16.5% -7.4% 6.1% 0.7% 3.4% 1.3% -2.0% 6.5% -2.2% -15.3% -4.0% -2.1% -2.6%
2006
Gr. 3 -12.2% 2.1% 1.8% 5.5% 9.4% 6.0% 0.6% -2.3% -3.9% -3.7% -4.1% 0.7% 0.0%
Gr. 4 -3.7% 5.1% 3.3% 6.6% 2.8% 1.5% 0.7% -7.3% 3.2% -7.5% 2.3% -2.3% 0.4%
Gr. 5 -9.1% -10.0% 8.7% -8.0% 7.2% 2.5% 0.3% -2.1% 6.5% 1.3% 0.3% 6.8% 0.4%
Comparison of Core Area Study Group NJASK Math Score Changes

16. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 16
NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014
Comparative District Grades 3 through 5

17. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 17
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Avg
Grade 3 85.7% 87.4% 89.7% 78.2% 79.9% 79.3% 78.7% 80.2% 81.1% 82.2%
Grade 4 80.9% 83.6% 85.5% 75.4% 77.3% 80.5% 78.1% 80.6% 79.3% 80.1%
Grade 5 83.9% 82.8% 79.6% 78.6% 79.6% 82.5% 86.8% 81.9% 84.4% 82.2%
Suburban Trends Area Comparative District Chart
NJASK Math Scores 2006-2014
Source: N.J. School Performance Report and U.S. Census Bureau
Includes: Franklin Lakes, Jefferson Township, Margate City, Paterson (Select),
Tenafly, Totowa and Ventnor City

18. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 18
School
District Jefferson Twp Totowa Franklin LakesPaterson Margate City Ventnor City Tenafly
Comparative
Distr. Avg.
2014
Gr. 3 87.1% 82.2% 87.8% 60.4% 95.7% 65.5% 89.2% 81.1%
Gr. 4 83.5% 81.9% 97.3% 61.2% 84.5% 56.1% 90.4% 79.3%
Gr. 5 94.8% 77.1% 94.2% 60.6% 89.6% 78.7% 95.9% 84.4%
2013
Gr. 3 80.5% 84.0% 97.0% 56.0% 88.0% 65.0% 91.0% 80.2%
Gr. 4 82.0% 83.0% 87.0% 53.3% 93.0% 71.0% 95.0% 80.6%
Gr. 5 91.0% 73.0% 89.0% 59.3% 81.0% 81.0% 99.0% 81.9%
2012
Gr. 3 87.0% 80.0% 89.0% 54.0% 92.0% 61.0% 96.0% 78.7%
Gr. 4 83.5% 73.0% 95.0% 52.3% 84.0% 59.0% 100.0% 78.1%
Gr. 5 90.5% 87.0% 98.0% 64.0% 95.0% 80.0% 93.0% 86.8%
2011
Gr. 3 89.4% 74.5% 97.0% 47.1% 83.1% 67.0% 96.9% 79.3%
Gr. 4 83.9% 80.0% 96.9% 55.4% 91.1% 59.2% 96.9% 80.5%
Gr. 5 89.5% 76.2% 98.5% 52.6% 91.1% 75.4% 94.0% 82.5%
2010
Gr. 3 89.0% 76.0% 98.3% 53.9% 91.1% 59.8% 91.0% 79.9%
Gr. 4 82.6% 76.0% 89.3% 51.5% 85.7% 64.4% 91.4% 77.3%
Gr. 5 91.9% 77.0% 96.9% 41.2% 77.8% 75.5% 96.6% 79.6%
2009
Gr. 3 85.6% 69.9% 88.5% 42.1% 92.0% 75.5% 93.6% 78.2%
Gr. 4 81.5% 70.6% 95.4% 46.5% 84.0% 64.4% 85.7% 75.4%
Gr. 5 83.7% 63.4% 96.9% 46.4% 95.0% 67.0% 97.6% 78.6%
2008
Gr. 3 95.8% 93.5% 98.5% 58.5% 98.1% 89.3% 94.5% 89.7%
Gr. 4 93.5% 80.5% 96.8% 58.0% 92.6% 76.8% 100.0% 85.5%
Gr. 5 93.3% 69.4% 100.0% 51.5% 88.9% 58.8% 95.7% 79.6%
2007
Gr. 3 95.3% 84.7% 93.0% 61.7% 100.0% 79.6% 97.5% 87.4%
Gr. 4 87.2% 76.7% 100.0% 55.0% 94.5% 71.7% 100.0% 83.6%
Gr. 5 91.7% 78.8% 95.6% 56.4% 93.4% 63.6% 100.0% 82.8%
2006
Gr. 3 89.7% 84.3% 100.0% 61.2% 100.0% 68.8% 96.0% 85.7%
Gr. 4 83.9% 71.3% 93.9% 53.8% 90.7% 74.2% 98.5% 80.9%
Gr. 5 90.6% 81.7% 97.2% 46.6% 91.4% 82.5% 97.3% 83.9%
NJASK Math
Comparative District Score Averages 2006-2014

19. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 19
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2014
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2013
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2012
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2011
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2010
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2009
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2008
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2007
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2006
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
80.0%
76.3%
82.8%
77.4%
79.6%
80.7%
70.5%
75.3%
84.9%
76.3%
77.8%
79.8%
76.8%
75.3%
76.7%76.5%
72.1%
75.5%
88.3%
83.6%
76.3%
86.5%
80.9%
80.6%
83.3%
78.7%
81.7%
NJASK Math Comparative District Averages by Grade

20. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 20
NJASK Comparative School District Math Rankings By Year - Grade 3
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Margate City 95.7% 84.5% 89.6%
2 Tenafly 89.2% 90.4% 95.9%
3
Franklin
Lakes 87.8% 97.3% 94.2%
4
Jefferson
Twp 87.1% 83.5% 94.8%
5 Totowa 82.2% 81.9% 77.1%
6 Ventnor City 65.5% 56.1% 78.7%
7 Paterson 60.4% 61.2% 60.6%
2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 91.0% 95.0% 99.0%
2 Margate City 88.0% 93.0% 81.0%
3
Franklin
Lakes 97.0% 87.0% 89.0%
4 Totowa 84.0% 83.0% 73.0%
5
Jefferson
Twp 80.5% 82.0% 91.0%
6 Ventnor City 65.0% 71.0% 81.0%
7 Paterson 56.0% 53.3% 59.3%
2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 96.0% 100.0% 93.0%
2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%
3
Franklin
Lakes 89.0% 95.0% 98.0%
4
Jefferson
Twp 87.0% 83.5% 90.5%
5 Totowa 80.0% 73.0% 87.0%
6 Ventnor City 61.0% 59.0% 80.0%
7 Paterson 54.0% 52.3% 64.0%
2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 97.0% 96.9% 98.5%
2 Tenafly 96.9% 96.9% 94.0%
3
Jefferson
Twp 89.4% 83.9% 89.5%
4 Margate City 83.1% 91.1% 91.1%
5 Totowa 74.5% 80.0% 76.2%
6 Ventnor City 67.0% 59.2% 75.4%
7 Paterson 47.1% 55.4% 52.6%
2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%
2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%
3
Franklin
Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%
4
Jefferson
Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%
5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%
6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%
7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%
2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%
2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%
3
Franklin
Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%
4
Jefferson
Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%
5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%
6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%
7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%
2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 98.5% 96.8% 100.0%
2 Margate City 98.1% 92.6% 88.9%
3
Jefferson
Twp 95.8% 93.5% 93.3%
4 Tenafly 94.5% 100.0% 95.7%
5 Totowa 93.5% 80.5% 69.4%
6 Ventnor City 89.3% 76.8% 58.8%
7 Paterson 58.5% 58.0% 51.5%
2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Margate City 100.0% 94.5% 93.4%
2 Tenafly 97.5% 100.0% 100.0%
3
Jefferson
Twp 95.3% 87.2% 91.7%
4
Franklin
Lakes 93.0% 100.0% 95.6%
5 Totowa 84.7% 76.7% 78.8%
6 Ventnor City 79.6% 71.7% 63.6%
7 Paterson 61.7% 55.0% 56.4%
2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 100.0% 93.9% 97.2%
2 Margate City 100.0% 90.7% 91.4%
3 Tenafly 96.0% 98.5% 97.3%
4
Jefferson
Twp 89.7% 83.9% 90.6%
5 Totowa 84.3% 71.3% 81.7%
6 Ventnor City 68.8% 74.2% 82.5%
7 Paterson 61.2% 53.8% 46.6%

21. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 21
NJASK Comparative School District Math Rankings By Year - Grade 4
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 87.8% 97.3% 94.2%
2 Tenafly 89.2% 90.4% 95.9%
3 Margate City 95.7% 84.5% 89.6%
4
Jefferson
Twp 87.1% 83.5% 94.8%
5 Totowa 82.2% 81.9% 77.1%
6 Paterson 60.4% 61.2% 60.6%
7 Ventnor City 65.5% 56.1% 78.7%
2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 91.0% 95.0% 99.0%
2 Margate City 88.0% 93.0% 81.0%
3
Franklin
Lakes 97.0% 87.0% 89.0%
4 Totowa 84.0% 83.0% 73.0%
5
Jefferson
Twp 80.5% 82.0% 91.0%
6 Ventnor City 65.0% 71.0% 81.0%
7 Paterson 56.0% 53.3% 59.3%
2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 96.0% 100.0% 93.0%
2
Jefferson
Twp 89.0% 95.0% 98.0%
3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%
4 Paterson 87.0% 83.5% 90.5%
5 Tenafly 80.0% 73.0% 87.0%
6 Totowa 61.0% 59.0% 80.0%
7 Ventnor City 54.0% 52.3% 64.0%
2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 97.0% 96.9% 98.5%
2 Tenafly 96.9% 96.9% 94.0%
3 Margate City 83.1% 91.1% 91.1%
4
Jefferson
Twp 89.4% 83.9% 89.5%
5 Totowa 74.5% 80.0% 76.2%
6 Ventnor City 67.0% 59.2% 75.4%
7 Paterson 47.1% 55.4% 52.6%
2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%
2 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%
3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%
4
Jefferson
Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%
5 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%
6 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%
7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%
2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%
2 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%
3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%
4
Jefferson
Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%
5 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%
6 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%
7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%
2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 94.5% 100.0% 95.7%
2
Franklin
Lakes 98.5% 96.8% 100.0%
3
Jefferson
Twp 95.8% 93.5% 93.3%
4 Margate City 98.1% 92.6% 88.9%
5 Totowa 93.5% 80.5% 69.4%
6 Ventnor City 89.3% 76.8% 58.8%
7 Paterson 58.5% 58.0% 51.5%
2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 93.0% 100.0% 95.6%
2 Tenafly 97.5% 100.0% 100.0%
3 Margate City 100.0% 94.5% 93.4%
4
Jefferson
Twp 95.3% 87.2% 91.7%
5 Totowa 84.7% 76.7% 78.8%
6 Ventnor City 79.6% 71.7% 63.6%
7 Paterson 61.7% 55.0% 56.4%
2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 96.0% 98.5% 97.3%
2
Franklin
Lakes 100.0% 93.9% 97.2%
3 Margate City 100.0% 90.7% 91.4%
4
Jefferson
Twp 89.7% 83.9% 90.6%
5 Ventnor City 68.8% 74.2% 82.5%
6 Totowa 84.3% 71.3% 81.7%
7 Paterson 61.2% 53.8% 46.6%

22. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 22
2014 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 89.2% 90.4% 95.9%
2
Jefferson
Twp 87.1% 83.5% 94.8%
3
Franklin
Lakes 87.8% 97.3% 94.2%
4 Margate City 95.7% 84.5% 89.6%
5 Ventnor City 65.5% 56.1% 78.7%
6 Totowa 82.2% 81.9% 77.1%
7 Paterson 60.4% 61.2% 60.6%
2013 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 91.0% 95.0% 99.0%
2
Jefferson
Twp 80.5% 82.0% 91.0%
3
Franklin
Lakes 97.0% 87.0% 89.0%
4 Margate City 88.0% 93.0% 81.0%
5 Ventnor City 65.0% 71.0% 81.0%
6 Totowa 84.0% 83.0% 73.0%
7 Paterson 56.0% 53.3% 59.3%
2012 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 89.0% 95.0% 98.0%
2 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%
3 Tenafly 96.0% 100.0% 93.0%
4
Jefferson
Twp 87.0% 83.5% 90.5%
5 Totowa 80.0% 73.0% 87.0%
6 Ventnor City 61.0% 59.0% 80.0%
7 Paterson 54.0% 52.3% 64.0%
2011 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 97.0% 96.9% 98.5%
2 Tenafly 96.9% 96.9% 94.0%
3 Margate City 83.1% 91.1% 91.1%
4
Jefferson
Twp 89.4% 83.9% 89.5%
5 Totowa 74.5% 80.0% 76.2%
6 Ventnor City 67.0% 59.2% 75.4%
7 Paterson 47.1% 55.4% 52.6%
2010 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%
2
Franklin
Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%
3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%
4
Jefferson
Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%
5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%
6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%
7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%
2009 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 93.6% 85.7% 97.6%
2
Franklin
Lakes 88.5% 95.4% 96.9%
3 Margate City 92.0% 84.0% 95.0%
4
Jefferson
Twp 85.6% 81.5% 83.7%
5 Ventnor City 75.5% 64.4% 67.0%
6 Totowa 69.9% 70.6% 63.4%
7 Paterson 42.1% 46.5% 46.4%
2008 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 98.5% 96.8% 100.0%
2 Tenafly 94.5% 100.0% 95.7%
3
Jefferson
Twp 95.8% 93.5% 93.3%
4 Margate City 98.1% 92.6% 88.9%
5 Totowa 93.5% 80.5% 69.4%
6 Ventnor City 89.3% 76.8% 58.8%
7 Paterson 58.5% 58.0% 51.5%
2007 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 97.5% 100.0% 100.0%
2
Franklin
Lakes 93.0% 100.0% 95.6%
3 Margate City 100.0% 94.5% 93.4%
4
Jefferson
Twp 95.3% 87.2% 91.7%
5 Totowa 84.7% 76.7% 78.8%
6 Ventnor City 79.6% 71.7% 63.6%
7 Paterson 61.7% 55.0% 56.4%
2006 Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 96.0% 98.5% 97.3%
2
Franklin
Lakes 100.0% 93.9% 97.2%
3 Margate City 100.0% 90.7% 91.4%
4
Jefferson
Twp 89.7% 83.9% 90.6%
5 Ventnor City 68.8% 74.2% 82.5%
6 Totowa 84.3% 71.3% 81.7%
7 Paterson 61.2% 53.8% 46.6%
NJASK Comparative School District Math Rankings By Year - Grade 5

23. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 23
86.0%
87.0%
88.0%
89.0%
90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
100.0%
Margate
City
TenaflyTenaflyFranklin
Lakes
TenaflyTenaflyFranklin
Lakes
Margate
City
Franklin
Lakes
201420132012201120102009200820072006
95.7%
91.0%
96.0%
97.0%
93.6%93.6%
98.5%
100.0%100.0%
Comparative District
Grade 3 First Place Math Rankings
2006-2014
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
100.0%
Margate
City
TenaflyTenaflyFranklin
Lakes
TenaflyTenaflyFranklin
Lakes
Margate
City
Franklin
Lakes
201420132012201120102009200820072006
97.3%
95.0%
100.0%
96.9%
95.4%95.4%
100.0%100.0%
98.5%
Comparative District
Grade 4 First Place Math Rankings
2006-2014
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
100.0%
Margate
City
TenaflyTenaflyFranklin
Lakes
TenaflyTenaflyFranklin
Lakes
Margate
City
Franklin
Lakes
201420132012201120102009200820072006
95.9%
99.0%
98.0%
98.5%
97.6%97.6%
100.0%100.0%
97.3%
Comparative District
Grade 5 First Place Math Rankings
2006-2014
Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking Grade 4 - First Place Ranking Grade 5 - First Place Ranking
NJASK Comparative District Math First-Place Rankings By Year
2014
Franklin
Lakes 97.3%
2013 Tenafly 95.0%
2012
Franklin
Lakes 100.0%
2011
Franklin
Lakes 96.9%
2010
Franklin
Lakes 95.4%
2009
Franklin
Lakes 95.4%
2008 Tenafly 100.0%
2007
Franklin
Lakes 100.0%
2006 Tenafly 98.5%
2014 Margate City 95.7%
2013 Tenafly 91.0%
2012 Tenafly 96.0%
2011
Franklin
Lakes 97.0%
2010 Tenafly 93.6%
2009 Tenafly 93.6%
2008
Franklin
Lakes 98.5%
2007 Margate City 100.0%
2006
Franklin
Lakes 100.0%
2014
Franklin
Lakes 97.3%
2013 Tenafly 95.0%
2012
Franklin
Lakes 100.0%
2011
Franklin
Lakes 96.9%
2010
Franklin
Lakes 95.4%
2009
Franklin
Lakes 95.4%
2008 Tenafly 100.0%
2007
Franklin
Lakes 100.0%
2006 Tenafly 98.5%

24. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 24
-15.0%
-14.0%
-13.0%
-12.0%
-11.0%
-10.0%
-9.0%
-8.0%
-7.0%
-6.0%
-5.0%
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
16.0%
17.0%
18.0%
19.0%
20.0%
2006
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2007
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2008
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2009
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2010
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2011
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2012
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2013
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
2014
Gr.3
Gr.4
Gr.5
-5.5%
-9.7%
-12.2%
-4.3%
-5.3%
-14.6%
-4.0%
-4.9%
8.0%
4.4%
-2.0%
-4.3%
7.0%
2.6%
4.0%
5.4%
2.4%
8.8%
-7.4%
8.1%
12.8%
3.5%
9.0%
7.4%
4.4%
2.9%
11.9%
NJASK Comparative District Math Score Changes by Percent

25. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 25
-50.0% -40.0% -30.0% -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0%
2014
Gr. 3
Gr. 4
Gr. 5
2013
Gr. 3
Gr. 4
Gr. 5
2012
Gr. 3
Gr. 4
Gr. 5
2011
Gr. 3
Gr. 4
Gr. 5
2010
Gr. 3
Gr. 4
Gr. 5
2009
Gr. 3
Gr. 4
Gr. 5
2008
Gr. 3
Gr. 4
Gr. 5
2007
Gr. 3
Gr. 4
Gr. 5
2006
Gr. 3
Gr. 4
Gr. 5
Franklin Lakes
Jefferson Twp
Margate City
Paterson
Tenafly
Totowa
Ventnor City
Comparison of Comparative District
NJASK Math Score Changes by Percent

26. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 26
NJASK Comparative District Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 3
2014 Gr. 3
1 Margate City 20.1%
2 Tenafly 13.6%
3
Franklin
Lakes 12.2%
4
Jefferson
Twp 11.5%
5 Totowa 6.6%
6 Ventnor City -10.1%
7 Paterson -15.2%
2013 Gr. 3
1
Franklin
Lakes 23.1%
2 Tenafly 17.1%
3 Margate City 14.1%
4 Totowa 10.1%
5
Jefferson
Twp 6.6%
6 Ventnor City -8.9%
7 Paterson -17.9%
2012 Gr. 3
1 Tenafly 18.1%
2 Margate City 14.1%
3
Franklin
Lakes 11.1%
4
Jefferson
Twp 9.1%
5 Totowa 2.1%
6 Ventnor City -16.9%
7 Paterson -23.9%
2011 Gr. 3
1
Franklin
Lakes 26.1%
2 Tenafly 26.0%
3
Jefferson
Twp 18.4%
4 Margate City 12.2%
5 Totowa 3.6%
6 Ventnor City -3.9%
7 Paterson -23.8%
2010 Gr. 3
1
Franklin
Lakes 28.5%
2 Margate City 21.3%
3 Tenafly 21.2%
4
Jefferson
Twp 19.2%
5 Totowa 6.2%
6 Ventnor City -10.0%
7 Paterson -15.9%
2009 Gr. 3
1 Tenafly 21.6%
2 Margate City 20.0%
3
Franklin
Lakes 16.5%
4
Jefferson
Twp 13.6%
5 Ventnor City 3.5%
6 Totowa -2.1%
7 Paterson -29.9%
2008 Gr. 3
1
Franklin
Lakes 6.2%
2 Margate City 5.8%
3
Jefferson
Twp 3.5%
4 Tenafly 2.2%
5 Totowa 1.2%
6 Ventnor City -3.0%
7 Paterson -33.8%
2007 Gr. 3
1 Margate City 9.3%
2 Tenafly 6.8%
3
Jefferson
Twp 4.5%
4
Franklin
Lakes 2.3%
5 Totowa -6.0%
6 Ventnor City -11.1%
7 Paterson -29.0%
2006 Gr. 3
1
Franklin
Lakes 11.2%
2 Margate City 11.2%
3 Tenafly 7.2%
4
Jefferson
Twp
0.9%
5 Totowa
-4.5%
6 Ventnor City -20.0%
7 Paterson -27.6%

27. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 27
2010 Gr. 4
1 Tenafly 18.8%
2
Franklin
Lakes 16.7%
3 Margate City 13.1%
4
Jefferson
Twp 9.9%
5 Totowa 3.4%
6 Ventnor City -8.2%
7 Paterson -21.1%
2009 Gr. 4
1
Franklin
Lakes 21.3%
2 Tenafly 11.6%
3 Margate City 9.9%
4
Jefferson
Twp 7.4%
5 Totowa -3.5%
6 Ventnor City -9.7%
7 Paterson -27.5%
2008 Gr. 4
1 Tenafly 11.5%
2
Franklin
Lakes 8.3%
3
Jefferson
Twp 4.9%
4 Margate City 4.1%
5 Totowa -8.0%
6 Ventnor City -11.7%
7 Paterson -30.5%
2007 Gr. 3
1 Margate City 9.3%
2 Tenafly 6.8%
3
Jefferson
Twp 4.5%
4
Franklin
Lakes 2.3%
5 Totowa -6.0%
6 Ventnor City -11.1%
7 Paterson -29.0%
2014 Gr. 4
1
Franklin
Lakes 24.0%
2 Tenafly 17.1%
3 Margate City 11.2%
4
Jefferson
Twp 10.2%
5 Totowa 8.6%
6 Paterson -12.2%
7 Ventnor City -17.2%
2013 Gr. 4
1 Tenafly 24.4%
2 Margate City 22.4%
3
Franklin
Lakes 16.4%
4 Totowa 12.4%
5
Jefferson
Twp 11.4%
6 Ventnor City 0.4%
7 Paterson -17.2%
2012 Gr. 4
1 Tenafly 32.8%
2
Franklin
Lakes 27.8%
3 Margate City 16.8%
4
Jefferson
Twp 16.3%
5 Totowa 5.8%
6 Ventnor City -8.2%
7 Paterson -14.9%
2011 Gr. 4
1
Franklin
Lakes 21.5%
2 Tenafly 21.5%
3 Margate City 15.7%
4
Jefferson
Twp 8.5%
5 Totowa 4.6%
6 Ventnor City -16.2%
7 Paterson -20.0%
2006 Gr. 4
1 Tenafly 10.1%
2
Franklin
Lakes 5.5%
3 Margate City 2.3%
4
Jefferson
Twp -4.6%
5 Ventnor City -14.2%
6 Totowa -17.1%
7 Paterson -34.6%
NJASK Comparative District Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 4

28. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 28
2014 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 25.1%
2
Jefferson
Twp 24.0%
3
Franklin
Lakes 23.4%
4 Margate City 18.8%
5 Ventnor City 7.9%
6 Totowa 6.3%
7 Paterson -10.3%
2013 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 25.6%
2
Jefferson
Twp 17.6%
3
Franklin
Lakes 15.6%
4 Margate City 7.6%
5 Ventnor City 7.6%
6 Totowa -0.4%
7 Paterson -14.0%
2012 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 25.9%
2 Margate City 22.9%
3 Tenafly 20.9%
4
Jefferson
Twp 18.4%
5 Totowa 14.9%
6 Ventnor City 7.9%
7 Paterson -8.1%
2011 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 27.5%
2 Tenafly 23.0%
3 Margate City 20.1%
4
Jefferson
Twp 18.5%
5 Totowa 5.2%
6 Ventnor City 4.4%
7 Paterson -18.4%
2010 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 24.2%
2 Tenafly 23.9%
3
Jefferson
Twp 19.2%
4 Margate City 5.1%
5 Totowa 4.3%
6 Ventnor City 2.8%
7 Paterson -31.5%
2009 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 17.8%
2
Franklin
Lakes 17.1%
3 Margate City 15.2%
4
Jefferson
Twp 3.9%
5 Ventnor City -12.8%
6 Totowa -16.4%
7 Paterson -33.4%
2008 Gr. 5
1
Franklin
Lakes 31.7%
2 Tenafly 27.4%
3
Jefferson
Twp 25.0%
4 Margate City 20.6%
5 Totowa 1.1%
6 Ventnor City -9.5%
7 Paterson -16.8%
2007 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 4.7%
2
Franklin
Lakes 0.3%
3 Margate City -1.9%
4
Jefferson
Twp -3.6%
5 Totowa -16.5%
6 Ventnor City -31.7%
7 Paterson -38.9%
2006 Gr. 5
1 Tenafly 3.4%
2
Franklin
Lakes 3.3%
3 Margate City -2.5%
4
Jefferson
Twp -3.4%
5 Ventnor City -11.4%
6 Totowa -12.2%
7 Paterson -47.3%
NJASK Comparative District Math Percentages by Rank - Grade 5

29. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 29
2014 Margate City 20.1%
2013
Franklin
Lakes 23.1%
2012 Tenafly 18.1%
2011
Franklin
Lakes 26.1%
2010
Franklin
Lakes 28.5%
2009 Tenafly 21.6%
2008
Franklin
Lakes 6.2%
2007 Margate City 9.3%
2006
Franklin
Lakes 11.2%
Grade 3 - First-Place Ranking
2014
Franklin
Lakes 24.0%
2013 Tenafly 24.4%
2012 Tenafly 18.1%
2011 Tenafly 32.8%
2010
Franklin
Lakes 21.5%
2009 Tenafly 18.8%
2008
Franklin
Lakes 21.3%
2007 Tenafly 11.5%
2006 Tenafly 10.1%
Grade 4 - First-Place Ranking
2014 Tenafly 25.1%
2013 Tenafly 25.6%
2012
Franklin
Lakes 25.9%
2011
Franklin
Lakes 27.5%
2010
Franklin
Lakes 24.2%
2009 Tenafly 17.8%
2008
Franklin
Lakes 31.7%
2007 Tenafly 4.7%
2006 Tenafly 3.4%
Grade 5 - First-Place Ranking
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
16.0%
17.0%
18.0%
19.0%
20.0%
21.0%
22.0%
23.0%
24.0%
25.0%
26.0%
27.0%
28.0%
29.0%
30.0%
Margate
City
Franklin
Lakes
TenaflyFranklin
Lakes
Franklin
Lakes
TenaflyFranklin
Lakes
Margate
City
Franklin
Lakes
201420132012201120102009200820072006
20.1%
23.1%
18.1%
26.1%
28.5%
21.6%
6.2%
9.3%
11.2%
Comparative District
Grade 3 First Place Math Percentage Rankings
2006-2014
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
16.0%
17.0%
18.0%
19.0%
20.0%
21.0%
22.0%
23.0%
24.0%
25.0%
26.0%
27.0%
28.0%
29.0%
30.0%
31.0%
32.0%
33.0%
Franklin
Lakes
TenaflyTenaflyTenaflyFranklin
Lakes
TenaflyFranklin
Lakes
TenaflyTenafly
201420132012201120102009200820072006
24.0%24.4%
18.1%
32.8%
21.5%
18.8%
21.3%
11.5%
10.1%
Comparative District
Grade 4 First Place Math Percentage Rankings
2006-2014
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
16.0%
17.0%
18.0%
19.0%
20.0%
21.0%
22.0%
23.0%
24.0%
25.0%
26.0%
27.0%
28.0%
29.0%
30.0%
31.0%
32.0%
TenaflyTenaflyFranklin
Lakes
Franklin
Lakes
Franklin
Lakes
TenaflyFranklin
Lakes
TenaflyTenafly
201420132012201120102009200820072006
25.1%
25.6%25.9%
27.5%
24.2%
17.8%
31.7%
4.7%
3.4%
Comparative District
Grade 5 First Place Math Percentage Rankings
2006-2014
NJASK Comparative District First-Place Math Score Changes by Percentage

30. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 30
Comparison of Comparison District NJASK Math Score Changes
Franklin LakesJefferson Twp Margate City Paterson Tenafly Totowa Ventnor City
Comparative
Distr. Avg.
2014
Gr. 3 12.2% 11.5% 20.1% -15.2% 13.6% 6.6% -10.1% 4.4%
Gr. 4 24.0% 10.2% 11.2% -12.2% 17.1% 8.6% -17.2% 2.9%
Gr. 5 23.4% 24.0% 18.8% -10.3% 25.1% 6.3% 7.9% 11.9%
2013
Gr. 3 23.1% 6.6% 14.1% -17.9% 17.1% 10.1% -8.9% 3.5%
Gr. 4 16.4% 11.4% 22.4% -17.2% 24.4% 12.4% 0.4% 9.0%
Gr. 5 15.6% 17.6% 7.6% -14.0% 25.6% -0.4% 7.6% 7.4%
2012
Gr. 3 11.1% 9.1% 14.1% -23.9% 18.1% 2.1% -16.9% -7.4%
Gr. 4 27.8% 16.3% 16.8% -14.9% 32.8% 5.8% -8.2% 8.1%
Gr. 5 25.9% 18.4% 22.9% -8.1% 20.9% 14.9% 7.9% 12.8%
2011
Gr. 3 26.1% 18.4% 12.2% -23.8% 26.0% 3.6% -3.9% 5.4%
Gr. 4 21.5% 8.5% 15.7% -20.0% 21.5% 4.6% -16.2% 2.4%
Gr. 5 27.5% 18.5% 20.1% -18.4% 23.0% 5.2% 4.4% 8.8%
2010
Gr. 3 28.5% 19.2% 21.3% -15.9% 21.2% 6.2% -10.0% 7.0%
Gr. 4 16.7% 9.9% 13.1% -21.1% 18.8% 3.4% -8.2% 2.6%
Gr. 5 24.2% 19.2% 5.1% -31.5% 23.9% 4.3% 2.8% 4.0%
2009
Gr. 3 16.5% 13.6% 20.0% -29.9% 21.6% -2.1% 3.5% 4.4%
Gr. 4 21.3% 7.4% 9.9% -27.5% 11.6% -3.5% -9.7% -2.0%
Gr. 5 17.1% 3.9% 15.2% -33.4% 17.8% -16.4% -12.8% -4.3%
2008
Gr. 3 6.2% 3.5% 5.8% -33.8% 2.2% 1.2% -3.0% -4.0%
Gr. 4 8.3% 4.9% 4.1% -30.5% 11.5% -8.0% -11.7% -4.9%
Gr. 5 31.7% 25.0% 20.6% -16.8% 27.4% 1.1% -9.5% 8.0%
2007
Gr. 3 2.3% 4.5% 9.3% -29.0% 6.8% -6.0% -11.1% -4.3%
Gr. 4 13.8% 1.0% 8.3% -31.2% 13.8% -9.5% -14.5% -5.3%
Gr. 5 0.3% -3.6% -1.9% -38.9% 4.7% -16.5% -31.7% -14.6%
2006
Gr. 3 11.2% 0.9% 11.2% -27.6% 7.2% -4.5% -20.0% -5.5%
Gr. 4 5.5% -4.6% 2.3% -34.6% 10.1% -17.1% -14.2% -9.7%
Gr. 5 3.3% -3.4% -2.5% -47.3% 3.4% -12.2% -11.4% -12.2%

31. Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 31
SAT
Math Scores

32. Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate
School District
SAT
Participation
School
District
SAT
Participation
School
District
SAT
Participation
Core Towns Atlantic City 54.6% Pequannock 94.8%
Bloomingdale Bloomingdale 78.7% Kinnelon 94.0%
Butler Butler 78.7% Tenafly 94.0%
Kinnelon 94.0% Franklin Lakes 92.2% Franklin Lakes 92.2%
Riverdale Jefferson Twp 80.3% Oakland 91.0%
Pompton Lks Kinnelon 94.0% Wayne Hills 88.7%
Oakland 91.0% Lincoln Park 74.6% Paterson 88.1%
Wanaque Margate City 68.4% Wayne Valley 84.4%
Ringwood Oakland 91.0% Ringwood 83.5%
West Milford 73.9% Paterson 88.1% Wanaque 83.5%
Lincoln Park 74.6% Pequannock 94.8% Jefferson Twp 80.3%
Pequannock 94.8% Pompton Lks 77.1% Bloomingdale 78.7%
Wayne Hills 88.7% Ringwood 83.5% Butler 78.7%
Wayne Valley 84.4% Riverdale 77.1% Pompton Lks 77.1%
Core Town
Neighbors Tenafly 94.0% Riverdale 77.1%
Jefferson Twp 80.3% Totowa 72.4% Lincoln Park 74.6%
Montville 89.6% Ventnor City West Milford 73.9%
Totowa 72.4% Wanaque 83.5% Totowa 72.4%
Big Cities Wayne Hills 88.7% Margate City 68.4%
Paterson 88.1% Wayne Valley 84.4% Atlantic City 54.6%
Atlantic City 54.6% West Milford 73.9% Ventnor City 68.4%
AC HS Sending Districts
Margate City 54.6%
Ventnor City
Highest Scoring School in Study
Tenafly 94.0%
78.7%
77.1%
83.5%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 32

33. Core Study Area N.J. SAT Participation Rate
School
District
SAT
Participation
Pequannock 94.8%
Kinnelon 94.0%
Tenafly 94.0%
Franklin Lakes 92.2%
Oakland 91.0%
Wayne Hills 88.7%
Paterson 88.1%
Wayne Valley 84.4%
Ringwood 83.5%
Wanaque 83.5%
Jefferson Twp 80.3%
Bloomingdale 78.7%
Butler 78.7%
Pompton Lks 77.1%
Riverdale 77.1%
Lincoln Park 74.6%
West Milford 73.9%
Totowa 72.4%
Margate City 68.4%
Atlantic City 54.6%
Ventnor City 68.4%
School District
SAT
Participation
Core Towns
Bloomingdale
Butler
Kinnelon 94.0%
Riverdale
Pompton Lks
Oakland 91.0%
Wanaque
Ringwood
West Milford 73.9%
Lincoln Park 74.6%
Pequannock 94.8%
Wayne Hills 88.7%
Wayne Valley 84.4%
Core Town
Neighbors
Jefferson Twp 80.3%
Montville 89.6%
Totowa 72.4%
Big Cities
Paterson 88.1%
Atlantic City 54.6%
AC HS Sending Districts
Margate City 54.6%
Ventnor City
Highest Scoring School in Study
Tenafly 94.0%
78.7%
77.1%
83.5%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 33

34. 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
SAT Math Scores by School District 2006-2013
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 34

35. SAT Math Rankings by Year 2006-2011
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
1
Tenafly
H.S.
Tenafly
H.S.
Tenafly
H.S.
Tenafly
H.S.
Tenafly
H.S.
Tenafly
H.S.
Tenafly
H.S.
Tenafly
H.S.
2
Wayne
Hills H.S.
Wayne
Valley H.S.
Kinnelon
H.S.
Ramapo
H.S.
Wayne
Hills H.S.
Kinnelon
H.S.
Wayne
Hills H.S.
Pequannoc
k TWP RHS
3
Wayne
Valley H.S.
Wayne
Hills H.S.
Wayne
Hills H.S.
Wayne
Valley H.S.
Ramapo
H.S.
Wayne
Hills H.S.
Kinnelon
H.S.
Kinnelon
H.S.
4
Indian Hills
RHS
Indian Hills
RHS
Wayne
Valley H.S.
Kinnelon
H.S.
Kinnelon
H.S.
Ramapo
H.S.
Wayne
Valley H.S.
Indian Hills
RHS
5
Ramapo
H.S.
Ramapo
H.S.
Pompton
Lks H.S.
Wayne
Valley H.S.
Indian Hills
RHS
Indian Hills
RHS
Indian Hills
RHS
Ramapo
H.S.
6
Kinnelon
H.S.
Kinnelon
H.S.
Indian Hills
RHS
Pompton
Lks H.S.
Wayne
Valley
Pequannoc
k TWP RHS
Ramapo
H.S.
Wayne
Hills H.S.
7
Pompton
Lks H.S.
Boonton
H.S.
Ramapo
H.S.
Indian Hills
RHS
Pequannoc
k TWP RHS
Wayne
Valley
Pequannoc
k TWP RHS
Wayne
Valley H.S.
8
Pequannoc
k TWP RHS
Pompton
Lks H.S.
Lakeland
RHS
Pequannoc
k TWP RHS
Pompton
Lks H.S.
Lakeland
RHS
Pompton
Lks H.S.
Pompton
Lks H.S.
9
Jefferson
H.S.
Jefferson
H.S.
Jefferson
H.S.
Lakeland
RHS
Lakeland
RHS
Pompton
Lks H.S.
Lakeland
RHS
Lakeland
RHS
10
West
Milford
H.S.
West
Milford
H.S.
Pequannoc
k TWP RHS
Boonton
H.S.
West
Milford
H.S.
West
Milford
H.S.
West
Milford
H.S.
West
Milford
H.S.
11
Passaic
Valley RHS
Pequannoc
k TWP RHS
West
Milford
H.S. Butler H.S.
Passaic
Valley RHS Butler H.S. Butler H.S. Butler H.S.
12 Butler H.S.
Passaic
Valley RHS Butler H.S.
West
Milford
H.S.
Jefferson
H.S.
Boonton
H.S.
Jefferson
H.S.
Jefferson
H.S.
13
Boonton
H.S.
Lakeland
RHS
Passaic
Valley RHS
Passaic
Valley RHS Butler H.S.
Jefferson
H.S.
Passaic
Valley RHS
Passaic
Valley RHS
14
Lakeland
RHS Butler H.S.
Boonton
H.S.
Jefferson
H.S.
Boonton
H.S.
Passaic
Valley RHS
Boonton
H.S.
Boonton
H.S.
15
Atlantic
City H.S.
Atlantic
City H.S.
Atlantic
City H.S.
Atlantic
City H.S.
Atlantic
City H.S.
Atlantic
City H.S.
Atlantic
City H.S.
Atlantic
City H.S.
16 Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson Paterson
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 35

36. SAT Math Scores 2006-2013
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
Butler H.S. 505 501 499 487 499 499 487 497
Kinnelon H.S. 567 564 575 557 559 579 532 543
Pompton Lks
H.S. 527 528 518 535 541 548 503 539
Indian Hills RHS 560 546 539 556 538 541 542 546
Lakeland RHS 520 515 521 520 513 516 493 492
West Milford
H.S. 509 503 500 512 496 504 501 514
Boonton H.S. 491 494 499 481 502 490 516 497
Pequannock
TWP HS 573 536 539 546 517 513 500 539
Wayne Hills H.S. 555 566 569 568 565 569 549 566
Wayne Valley
H.S. 555 550 536 554 559 553 556 555
Jefferson H.S. 505 500 494 502 494 515 503 523
Passaic Valley
RHS 501 496 489 503 496 496 494 502
Ramapo H.S. 559 546 561 566 570 541 542 546
Paterson 340 377 395 408 398 398 404 410
Atlantic City
H.S. 461 450 449 447 441 468 454 444
Tenafly H.S. 652 632 636 640 630 623 619 620
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 36

37. SAT Math Rankings - 2006-2013
Butler H.S.
Kinnelon
H.S.
Pompton
Lks H.S.
Indian
Hills RHS
Lakeland
RHS
West
Milford
H.S.
Boonton
H.S.
Pequanno
ck TWP
RHS
Wayne
Hills
H.S.
Wayne
Valley
H.S.
Jefferson
H.S.
Passaic
Valley
RHS
Ramapo
H.S. Paterson
Atlantic
City H.S.
Tenafly
H.S.
SAT NJ
Ranking
2011 143 37 121 60 97 156 201 77 50 91 179 208 43 274 266 5
2013 505 567 527 560 520 509 491 573 555 555 505 501 559 340 461 652
2012 501 564 528 546 515 503 494 536 566 550 500 496 546 377 450 632
2011 499 575 518 539 521 500 499 539 569 536 494 489 561 395 449 636
2010 487 557 535 556 520 512 481 546 568 554 502 503 566 408 447 640
2009 499 559 541 538 513 496 502 517 565 559 494 496 570 398 441 630
2008 499 579 548 541 516 504 490 513 569 553 515 496 541 398 468 623
2007 487 532 503 542 493 501 516 500 549 556 503 494 542 404 454 619
2006 497 543 539 546 492 514 497 539 566 555 523 502 546 410 444 620
SAT
Participatio
n Rate 78.7% 94.0% 77.1% 91.0% 83.5% 73.9% 74.6% 94.8% 88.7% 84.0% 80.3% 72.4% 92.2% 88.1% 94.0%
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 37

38. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Tenafly H.S.
Ramapo H.S.
Wayne Hills H.S.
Kinnelon H.S.
Wayne Valley H.S.
Pompton Lks H.S.
Indian Hills RHS
Pequannock TWP RHS
Lakeland RHS
Boonton H.S.
Butler H.S.
West Milford H.S.
Passaic Valley RHS
Jefferson H.S.
Atlantic City H.S.
Paterson
630
570
565
559
559
541
538
517
513
502
499
496
496
494
441
398
SAT Math Scores - 2009
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Tenafly H.S.
Wayne Valley H.S.
Wayne Hills H.S.
Indian Hills RHS
Ramapo H.S.
Kinnelon H.S.
Boonton H.S.
Pompton Lks H.S.
Jefferson H.S.
West Milford H.S.
Pequannock TWP RHS
Passaic Valley RHS
Lakeland RHS
Butler H.S.
Atlantic City H.S.
Paterson
619
556
549
542
542
532
516
503
503
501
500
494
493
487
454
404
SAT Math Scores - 2007
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Tenafly H.S.
Wayne Hills H.S.
Wayne Valley
Indian Hills RHS
Ramapo H.S.
Kinnelon H.S.
Pompton Lks H.S.
Pequannock TWP RHS
Jefferson H.S.
West Milford H.S.
Passaic Valley RHS
Butler H.S.
Boonton H.S.
Lakeland RHS
Atlantic City H.S.
Paterson
620
566
555
546
546
543
539
539
523
514
502
497
497
492
444
410
SAT Math Scores - 2006
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Tenafly H.S.
Kinnelon H.S.
Wayne Hills H.S.
Wayne Valley H.S.
Pompton Lks H.S.
Indian Hills RHS
Ramapo H.S.
Lakeland RHS
Jefferson H.S.
Pequannock TWP RHS
West Milford H.S.
Butler H.S.
Passaic Valley RHS
Boonton H.S.
Atlantic City H.S.
Paterson
623
579
569
553
548
541
541
516
515
513
504
499
496
490
468
398
SAT Math Scores - 2008
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Tenafly H.S.
Pequannock TWP RHS
Kinnelon H.S.
Indian Hills RHS
Ramapo H.S.
Wayne Hills H.S.
Wayne Valley H.S.
Pompton Lks H.S.
Lakeland RHS
West Milford H.S.
Butler H.S.
Jefferson H.S.
Passaic Valley RHS
Boonton H.S.
Atlantic City H.S.
Paterson
652
573
567
560
559
555
555
527
520
509
505
505
501
491
461
340
SAT Math Scores - 2013
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Tenafly H.S.
Wayne Hills H.S.
Kinnelon H.S.
Wayne Valley H.S.
Indian Hills RHS
Ramapo H.S.
Pequannock TWP RHS
Pompton Lks H.S.
Lakeland RHS
West Milford H.S.
Butler H.S.
Jefferson H.S.
Passaic Valley RHS
Boonton H.S.
Atlantic City H.S.
Paterson
632
566
564
550
546
546
536
528
515
503
501
500
496
494
450
377
SAT Math Scores - 2012
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Tenafly H.S.
Kinnelon H.S.
Wayne Hills H.S.
Ramapo H.S.
Indian Hills RHS
Pequannock TWP RHS
Wayne Valley H.S.
Lakeland RHS
Pompton Lks H.S.
West Milford H.S.
Butler H.S.
Boonton H.S.
Jefferson H.S.
Passaic Valley RHS
Atlantic City H.S.
Paterson
636
575
569
561
539
539
536
521
518
500
499
499
494
489
449
395
SAT Math Scores - 2011
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Tenafly H.S.
Wayne Hills H.S.
Ramapo H.S.
Kinnelon H.S.
Indian Hills RHS
Wayne Valley H.S.
Pequannock TWP RHS
Pompton Lks H.S.
Lakeland RHS
West Milford H.S.
Passaic Valley RHS
Jefferson H.S.
Butler H.S.
Boonton H.S.
Atlantic City H.S.
Paterson
640
568
566
557
556
554
546
535
520
512
503
502
487
481
447
408
SAT Math Scores - 2010
SAT Math Rankings - 2006-2013
Narrowing the Achievement Gap © 2015 Carole J. Rafferty 38