1. The document contains data on time (waktu) for different methods (metode) with 3 trials each. 2. A one-way ANOVA was conducted to compare the effect of method on time. There was a significant effect of method on time at the p<0.05 level for the three methods. 3. A Tukey HSD post hoc test indicated time was significantly lower for method 1 compared to method 4 (p=0.003), and significantly lower for method 2 compared to method 4 (p=0.02) and method 3 compared to method 4 (p=0.007).

1. Metode waktu
1 10
1 9
1 5
1 6
1 3
2 11
2 16
2 9
2 4
2 13
3 23
3 25
3 18
3 9
3 8
Oneway
Descriptives
waktu
95% Confidence Interval for
Mean
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum
1.00 3 8.0000 2.64575 1.52753 1.4276 14.5724 5.00 10.00
2.00 3 12.0000 3.60555 2.08167 3.0433 20.9567 9.00 16.00
3.00 3 10.0000 2.64575 1.52753 3.4276 16.5724 8.00 13.00
4.00 3 22.0000 3.60555 2.08167 13.0433 30.9567 18.00 25.00
Total 12 13.0000 6.23772 1.80067 9.0367 16.9633 5.00 25.00
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
waktu
Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
.267 3 8 .848

2. ANOVA
waktu
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between (Combined) 348.000 3 116.000 11.600 .003
Groups Linear Term Contrast 240.000 1 240.000 24.000 .001
Deviation
108.000 2 54.000 5.400 .033
Within Groups 80.000 8 10.000
Total 428.000 11
Contrast Coefficientsa
a. Coefficients for contrast 1 are not displayed
because the number of contrast coefficients
does not equal the number of groups.
Contrast Testsa
a. Contrast 1 cannot be evaluated because
the number of contrast coefficients does
not equal the number of groups.
Post Hoc Tests

3. Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: waktu
Mean
Difference 95% Confidence Interval
(I) metode (J) metode (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
Tukey HSD 1.00 2.00 -4.00000 2.58199 .455 -12.2684 4.2684
3.00 -2.00000 2.58199 .864 -10.2684 6.2684
4.00 -14.00000* 2.58199 .003 -22.2684 -5.7316
2.00 1.00 4.00000 2.58199 .455 -4.2684 12.2684
3.00 2.00000 2.58199 .864 -6.2684 10.2684
4.00 -10.00000* 2.58199 .020 -18.2684 -1.7316
3.00 1.00 2.00000 2.58199 .864 -6.2684 10.2684
2.00 -2.00000 2.58199 .864 -10.2684 6.2684
4.00 -12.00000* 2.58199 .007 -20.2684 -3.7316
4.00 1.00 14.00000* 2.58199 .003 5.7316 22.2684
2.00 10.00000* 2.58199 .020 1.7316 18.2684
3.00 12.00000* 2.58199 .007 3.7316 20.2684
LSD 1.00 2.00 -4.00000 2.58199 .160 -9.9541 1.9541
3.00 -2.00000 2.58199 .461 -7.9541 3.9541
4.00 -14.00000* 2.58199 .001 -19.9541 -8.0459
2.00 1.00 4.00000 2.58199 .160 -1.9541 9.9541
3.00 2.00000 2.58199 .461 -3.9541 7.9541
4.00 -10.00000* 2.58199 .005 -15.9541 -4.0459
3.00 1.00 2.00000 2.58199 .461 -3.9541 7.9541
2.00 -2.00000 2.58199 .461 -7.9541 3.9541
4.00 -12.00000* 2.58199 .002 -17.9541 -6.0459
4.00 1.00 14.00000* 2.58199 .001 8.0459 19.9541
2.00 10.00000* 2.58199 .005 4.0459 15.9541
3.00 12.00000* 2.58199 .002 6.0459 17.9541
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
Homogeneous Subsets
waktu
Subset for alpha = .05
metode N 1 2
Tukey HSDa 1.00 3 8.0000
3.00 3 10.0000
2.00 3 12.0000
4.00 3 22.0000
Sig. .455 1.000
Duncan a 1.00 3 8.0000
3.00 3 10.0000
2.00 3 12.0000
4.00 3 22.0000
Sig. .176 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
Means Plots

4. 22.00
20.00
18.00
Mean of waktu
16.00
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00
metode