Research & Development priorities for Southern Africaftaafrica
Regional research needs are many & are determined by several factors:
. Food security
. Commercial value
. Socio-economic value
. Response to regional strategies
Regional priorities broad & representative of common national priorities
CCARDESA progress Report - Prof T. Simalenga - GA 2014CCARDESA
CCARDESA has made progress establishing itself since launching in 2011. From 2012-2013 it recruited 15 staff, acquired office equipment and software, and began implementing projects. These included continental projects from FARA on technology adoption, capacity building projects, and quick win projects on conservation agriculture, climate change adaptation, and beekeeping. CCARDESA is focused on research areas like livestock, crops, aquaculture and forestry, and is implementing projects through strategic partnerships while working to strengthen agricultural development in the region.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COORDINATION IN SOUTHERN AFRICACCARDESA
SACCAR was established in 1984 by the Southern African Development Community (SADC), then known as the Southern African Development Coordinating Conference (SADCC) to coordinate agricultural research and training in the region.
A Memorandum of Understanding signed by the then Member States of SADC, namely Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Other countries joined as and when they got their independence
Policy Action for Sustainable Intensification of Crop Systems in UgandaIFPRI-Kampala
The PASIC project aims to stimulate policy action to support agricultural intensification in Uganda through evidence-based research. It is funded by the Embassy of the Netherlands and implemented by IITA, MAAIF, EPRC, and IFPRI over 4 years with a budget of 5 million USD. The project will research constraints and opportunities for intensifying irish potato and rice cropping systems. It will then use these lessons to develop zonal investment plans, identify needed policy improvements, and strengthen capacities for evidence-based policy action to support smallholder farmers in sustainably intensifying their production.
The Science Agenda for Agriculture in Africa (S3A)Francois Stepman
11 May 2018. Cotonou, Benin. In order to ensure that the Science Agenda is taken into account in the development of the projects to implement the PNIASAN (the National Agricultural Investment and Food Security and Nutrition Plan (PNIASAN 2017-2021), Benin has asked to join the Science Agenda.
Research & Development priorities for Southern Africaftaafrica
Regional research needs are many & are determined by several factors:
. Food security
. Commercial value
. Socio-economic value
. Response to regional strategies
Regional priorities broad & representative of common national priorities
CCARDESA progress Report - Prof T. Simalenga - GA 2014CCARDESA
CCARDESA has made progress establishing itself since launching in 2011. From 2012-2013 it recruited 15 staff, acquired office equipment and software, and began implementing projects. These included continental projects from FARA on technology adoption, capacity building projects, and quick win projects on conservation agriculture, climate change adaptation, and beekeeping. CCARDESA is focused on research areas like livestock, crops, aquaculture and forestry, and is implementing projects through strategic partnerships while working to strengthen agricultural development in the region.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COORDINATION IN SOUTHERN AFRICACCARDESA
SACCAR was established in 1984 by the Southern African Development Community (SADC), then known as the Southern African Development Coordinating Conference (SADCC) to coordinate agricultural research and training in the region.
A Memorandum of Understanding signed by the then Member States of SADC, namely Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Other countries joined as and when they got their independence
Policy Action for Sustainable Intensification of Crop Systems in UgandaIFPRI-Kampala
The PASIC project aims to stimulate policy action to support agricultural intensification in Uganda through evidence-based research. It is funded by the Embassy of the Netherlands and implemented by IITA, MAAIF, EPRC, and IFPRI over 4 years with a budget of 5 million USD. The project will research constraints and opportunities for intensifying irish potato and rice cropping systems. It will then use these lessons to develop zonal investment plans, identify needed policy improvements, and strengthen capacities for evidence-based policy action to support smallholder farmers in sustainably intensifying their production.
The Science Agenda for Agriculture in Africa (S3A)Francois Stepman
11 May 2018. Cotonou, Benin. In order to ensure that the Science Agenda is taken into account in the development of the projects to implement the PNIASAN (the National Agricultural Investment and Food Security and Nutrition Plan (PNIASAN 2017-2021), Benin has asked to join the Science Agenda.
Benin National Agricultural Investment and Food Security and Nutrition Plan (...Francois Stepman
11 May 2018. Cotonou, Benin. In order to ensure that the Science Agenda is taken into account in the development of the projects to implement the PNIASAN (the National Agricultural Investment and Food Security and Nutrition Plan (PNIASAN 2017-2021), Benin has asked to join the Science Agenda.
The document outlines strategic priorities for controlling aflatoxins in Africa. It discusses the impacts of aflatoxins on public health, food/nutrition security, and trade. The Partnership for Aflatoxin Control in Africa (PACA) was created to advocate and coordinate aflatoxin control across the continent. PACA's strategy involves activities at the continental, regional, and country levels. At each level, PACA aims to strengthen policies, build capacity, increase awareness, and support the development and adoption of solutions to reduce aflatoxin contamination in Africa.
Ethiopian Experience in Irrigatiion Development by Mr. Zena Habtewold BiruMalabo-Montpellier-Panel
The Ethiopian irrigation success story was the focus of the webinar organised by the Malabo Montpellier Panel on 14th February 2019, based on their second report, Water-Wise: Smart Irrigation Strategies for Africa, which summarizes the key findings of a systematic analysis of what six African countries at the forefront of progress on irrigation have done right: Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Morocco, Niger and South Africa.
The guest speaker and author of this presentation, Mr. Zena Habtewold Biru, Director of the Planning Monitoring and Evaluation Directorate at the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) and Focal Person for the Comprehensive African Agricultural Development Program (CAADP) discussed the case of Ethiopia’s remarkable growth in irrigation expansion over the last years, and the concrete practical steps that the government took to become one of the leading African countries in terms of agricultural irrigation, thereby reducing unemployment, poverty rate and malnutrition.
During the seminar Mr. Zena Habtewold Biru discussed the following questions:
•What did Ethiopia do differently?
•What are the main institutional innovations?
•What are the key policy measures?
•What are the country’s major programs and interventions?
•How and what did it take to mobilize the government to uptake strong regulatory frameworks that govern irrigation and the use of water in agriculture?
•What are the practical lessons for other Africans to learn from and to adapt to the context of their own countries?
The CAADP, ECOWAP, APP, NAIP and Poverty and Hunger reduction in NigeriaFrancois Stepman
The document discusses agriculture policies and programs in Nigeria and West Africa, including the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) and ECOWAS Agriculture Policy (ECOWAP). It provides context on these frameworks and their goals of promoting agricultural growth, food security, poverty reduction, and regional economic integration. The document also examines Nigeria's National Agriculture Investment Plan (NAIP) and implementation of CAADP/ECOWAP at various levels from global to national to local. Key commitments and targets outlined in the Malabo Declaration to achieve agricultural transformation by 2025 are also summarized.
THE COMPREHENSIVE AFRICA AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (CAADP) AND THE NA...Francois Stepman
This document provides information on Nigeria's agriculture sector and programs/policies implemented before and after the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP). Some key points:
1) It outlines Nigeria's agricultural statistics and challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, limited access to technology, and financial/market weaknesses.
2) Pre-CAADP programs are described from the 1960s-2000s aimed at increasing production, developing cooperatives, and irrigation.
3) CAADP and the National Agricultural Investment Plan (NAIP) framework are introduced, with the goal of achieving 10% agricultural budget allocation and 6% growth.
4) The NAIP identifies challenges and programs to address them in Nigeria and
The document discusses Joint Sector Reviews (JSRs) which are a process for mutual accountability in country agriculture sectors. JSRs assess sector performance against targets, identify strengths/weaknesses, and make recommendations. Several Southern African countries have launched JSR processes with support from organizations like ReSAKSS and NEPAD. Outcomes include countries using results to guide policy and increase data/M&E. Lessons indicate political support, inclusiveness, and data availability are important for effective JSRs.
The document summarizes the African Union's process for conducting a Biennial Review on the implementation of the Malabo Declaration by member states. It outlines the commitments under the Malabo Declaration, the indicators used to assess country performance, and the coordination mechanism for preparing country and regional reports. Member states are scored on 43 indicators across 7 commitment areas. Country scorecards are generated to show progress, with scores below the 2017 benchmark indicating areas that are "not on track" to meet Malabo targets. The summary provides an example scorecard for Country A and highlights areas of strong performance and those requiring attention.
This was a presentation done at a working session meeting by the African Group of Negotiators (AGN), United National Economic Commission for Africa/African Climate Policy Centre (UNECA/ACPC), Africa Development Bank (AfDB), The CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and AfricaInteract with support from International Development Research Centre (IDRC) for the agriculture and gender negotiators and experts to prepare the AGN submission to the upcoming 44th session of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) scheduled to take place from 16 to 26 May 2016 in Bonn, Germany.
1) The document discusses efforts to improve food security in Africa through the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) and related initiatives.
2) It outlines lessons learned from CAADP implementation including the need for mutual accountability and data to track progress towards goals.
3) Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support Systems (SAKSS) are being established in countries to help monitor and evaluate CAADP commitments by providing timely data and analysis to inform policies.
Presentation - Connecting The Dots: Policy Innovations for Food Systems Trans...Malabo-Montpellier-Panel
This document summarizes the key findings from a report on policy innovations for food systems transformation in Africa. It discusses the challenges facing African food systems, including demographic changes, dietary shifts, climate impacts, and economic shocks. It also outlines opportunities like improved agriculture, technology, and infrastructure. The methodology section describes how the report selected case studies of Rwanda, Ghana, Morocco, and Malawi based on their performance on indicators for sustainable food systems and enabling environments. Each country case highlights national policies and programs that have driven progress in areas like coordination, investment, inclusion, and resilience. The recommendations call for taking a holistic food systems approach in policymaking through multisectoral coordination, innovation, monitoring and evaluation, long-
The 2013 southern Africa regional dialogue on agriculture: brief presentation on the Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP), presented Martin Muchiero, SADC FANR, at
The 2013 Southern Africa Regional Dialogue on Agriculture,
05-06 November 2013
The document summarizes the status of CAADP implementation and the Agricultural Information Management System (AIMS) in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region. It outlines the core functions and key result areas of SADC's Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources Directorate, which facilitates issues related to CAADP. It also describes AIMS' objectives to integrate and rationalize agricultural information systems in support of food security and rural development, and provides details on its activities, components, and the development of a regional and national database.
29th FAO Regional Conference for Africa, Decentralized Offices NetworkFAO
This document summarizes a review of the FAO's decentralized office network in Africa. It proposes adapting the network to current development requirements and enhancing results delivery with limited resources. Specifically, it proposes strengthening some sub-regional offices, reducing the scope of others, and merging some project-funded teams into country offices. It also proposes analyzing high and upper-middle income countries on a case-by-case basis for potential partnership offices rather than traditional representation. The overall goal is to have a more efficient and effective network that better serves members' needs.
The document summarizes IFAD's Country Strategic Opportunities Programme in Cambodia from 2013-2018, called AIMS, which aims to accelerate inclusive markets for smallholders through three main approaches:
1) Selecting and facilitating high-value crop value chains with clear market demand, interest from buyers and farmers, and opportunities for competitive and sustainable production.
2) Developing value chains through brokering, facilitating partnerships, and "public goods" investments in infrastructure.
3) Expanding value chain financing through an innovation fund and partnerships to increase private investment in agriculture.
The program is implemented through regional hubs staffed by government, private sector, farmers groups and technical advisors to drive results and account for
ASARECA and UniBRAIN Implementation in Eastern and Central Africaasareca
Role of ASARECA: Linking Incubators with research through:
Sensitization of National & regional Research systems on UniBRAIN
Identification of research areas to be addressed
Identification of research products
Ensuring fair use of research products
Working with other partners to ensure smooth implementation
National Monitoring and Evaluation System of the Joint National Action Plan f...NAP Global Network
Presented by Viliami Takau in September 2020 at the Virtual Learning Event on Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) for National Adaptation in Pacific Small Island Developing States organized by organized by the NAP Global Network in collaboration with the Pacific Resilience Partnership (PRP)
Benin National Agricultural Investment and Food Security and Nutrition Plan (...Francois Stepman
11 May 2018. Cotonou, Benin. In order to ensure that the Science Agenda is taken into account in the development of the projects to implement the PNIASAN (the National Agricultural Investment and Food Security and Nutrition Plan (PNIASAN 2017-2021), Benin has asked to join the Science Agenda.
The document outlines strategic priorities for controlling aflatoxins in Africa. It discusses the impacts of aflatoxins on public health, food/nutrition security, and trade. The Partnership for Aflatoxin Control in Africa (PACA) was created to advocate and coordinate aflatoxin control across the continent. PACA's strategy involves activities at the continental, regional, and country levels. At each level, PACA aims to strengthen policies, build capacity, increase awareness, and support the development and adoption of solutions to reduce aflatoxin contamination in Africa.
Ethiopian Experience in Irrigatiion Development by Mr. Zena Habtewold BiruMalabo-Montpellier-Panel
The Ethiopian irrigation success story was the focus of the webinar organised by the Malabo Montpellier Panel on 14th February 2019, based on their second report, Water-Wise: Smart Irrigation Strategies for Africa, which summarizes the key findings of a systematic analysis of what six African countries at the forefront of progress on irrigation have done right: Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Morocco, Niger and South Africa.
The guest speaker and author of this presentation, Mr. Zena Habtewold Biru, Director of the Planning Monitoring and Evaluation Directorate at the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) and Focal Person for the Comprehensive African Agricultural Development Program (CAADP) discussed the case of Ethiopia’s remarkable growth in irrigation expansion over the last years, and the concrete practical steps that the government took to become one of the leading African countries in terms of agricultural irrigation, thereby reducing unemployment, poverty rate and malnutrition.
During the seminar Mr. Zena Habtewold Biru discussed the following questions:
•What did Ethiopia do differently?
•What are the main institutional innovations?
•What are the key policy measures?
•What are the country’s major programs and interventions?
•How and what did it take to mobilize the government to uptake strong regulatory frameworks that govern irrigation and the use of water in agriculture?
•What are the practical lessons for other Africans to learn from and to adapt to the context of their own countries?
The CAADP, ECOWAP, APP, NAIP and Poverty and Hunger reduction in NigeriaFrancois Stepman
The document discusses agriculture policies and programs in Nigeria and West Africa, including the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) and ECOWAS Agriculture Policy (ECOWAP). It provides context on these frameworks and their goals of promoting agricultural growth, food security, poverty reduction, and regional economic integration. The document also examines Nigeria's National Agriculture Investment Plan (NAIP) and implementation of CAADP/ECOWAP at various levels from global to national to local. Key commitments and targets outlined in the Malabo Declaration to achieve agricultural transformation by 2025 are also summarized.
THE COMPREHENSIVE AFRICA AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (CAADP) AND THE NA...Francois Stepman
This document provides information on Nigeria's agriculture sector and programs/policies implemented before and after the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP). Some key points:
1) It outlines Nigeria's agricultural statistics and challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, limited access to technology, and financial/market weaknesses.
2) Pre-CAADP programs are described from the 1960s-2000s aimed at increasing production, developing cooperatives, and irrigation.
3) CAADP and the National Agricultural Investment Plan (NAIP) framework are introduced, with the goal of achieving 10% agricultural budget allocation and 6% growth.
4) The NAIP identifies challenges and programs to address them in Nigeria and
The document discusses Joint Sector Reviews (JSRs) which are a process for mutual accountability in country agriculture sectors. JSRs assess sector performance against targets, identify strengths/weaknesses, and make recommendations. Several Southern African countries have launched JSR processes with support from organizations like ReSAKSS and NEPAD. Outcomes include countries using results to guide policy and increase data/M&E. Lessons indicate political support, inclusiveness, and data availability are important for effective JSRs.
The document summarizes the African Union's process for conducting a Biennial Review on the implementation of the Malabo Declaration by member states. It outlines the commitments under the Malabo Declaration, the indicators used to assess country performance, and the coordination mechanism for preparing country and regional reports. Member states are scored on 43 indicators across 7 commitment areas. Country scorecards are generated to show progress, with scores below the 2017 benchmark indicating areas that are "not on track" to meet Malabo targets. The summary provides an example scorecard for Country A and highlights areas of strong performance and those requiring attention.
This was a presentation done at a working session meeting by the African Group of Negotiators (AGN), United National Economic Commission for Africa/African Climate Policy Centre (UNECA/ACPC), Africa Development Bank (AfDB), The CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and AfricaInteract with support from International Development Research Centre (IDRC) for the agriculture and gender negotiators and experts to prepare the AGN submission to the upcoming 44th session of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) scheduled to take place from 16 to 26 May 2016 in Bonn, Germany.
1) The document discusses efforts to improve food security in Africa through the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) and related initiatives.
2) It outlines lessons learned from CAADP implementation including the need for mutual accountability and data to track progress towards goals.
3) Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support Systems (SAKSS) are being established in countries to help monitor and evaluate CAADP commitments by providing timely data and analysis to inform policies.
Presentation - Connecting The Dots: Policy Innovations for Food Systems Trans...Malabo-Montpellier-Panel
This document summarizes the key findings from a report on policy innovations for food systems transformation in Africa. It discusses the challenges facing African food systems, including demographic changes, dietary shifts, climate impacts, and economic shocks. It also outlines opportunities like improved agriculture, technology, and infrastructure. The methodology section describes how the report selected case studies of Rwanda, Ghana, Morocco, and Malawi based on their performance on indicators for sustainable food systems and enabling environments. Each country case highlights national policies and programs that have driven progress in areas like coordination, investment, inclusion, and resilience. The recommendations call for taking a holistic food systems approach in policymaking through multisectoral coordination, innovation, monitoring and evaluation, long-
The 2013 southern Africa regional dialogue on agriculture: brief presentation on the Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP), presented Martin Muchiero, SADC FANR, at
The 2013 Southern Africa Regional Dialogue on Agriculture,
05-06 November 2013
The document summarizes the status of CAADP implementation and the Agricultural Information Management System (AIMS) in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region. It outlines the core functions and key result areas of SADC's Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources Directorate, which facilitates issues related to CAADP. It also describes AIMS' objectives to integrate and rationalize agricultural information systems in support of food security and rural development, and provides details on its activities, components, and the development of a regional and national database.
29th FAO Regional Conference for Africa, Decentralized Offices NetworkFAO
This document summarizes a review of the FAO's decentralized office network in Africa. It proposes adapting the network to current development requirements and enhancing results delivery with limited resources. Specifically, it proposes strengthening some sub-regional offices, reducing the scope of others, and merging some project-funded teams into country offices. It also proposes analyzing high and upper-middle income countries on a case-by-case basis for potential partnership offices rather than traditional representation. The overall goal is to have a more efficient and effective network that better serves members' needs.
The document summarizes IFAD's Country Strategic Opportunities Programme in Cambodia from 2013-2018, called AIMS, which aims to accelerate inclusive markets for smallholders through three main approaches:
1) Selecting and facilitating high-value crop value chains with clear market demand, interest from buyers and farmers, and opportunities for competitive and sustainable production.
2) Developing value chains through brokering, facilitating partnerships, and "public goods" investments in infrastructure.
3) Expanding value chain financing through an innovation fund and partnerships to increase private investment in agriculture.
The program is implemented through regional hubs staffed by government, private sector, farmers groups and technical advisors to drive results and account for
ASARECA and UniBRAIN Implementation in Eastern and Central Africaasareca
Role of ASARECA: Linking Incubators with research through:
Sensitization of National & regional Research systems on UniBRAIN
Identification of research areas to be addressed
Identification of research products
Ensuring fair use of research products
Working with other partners to ensure smooth implementation
National Monitoring and Evaluation System of the Joint National Action Plan f...NAP Global Network
Presented by Viliami Takau in September 2020 at the Virtual Learning Event on Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) for National Adaptation in Pacific Small Island Developing States organized by organized by the NAP Global Network in collaboration with the Pacific Resilience Partnership (PRP)
UNCCD Global Mechanism_The Use of the Rio markers in the UNCCD_2014AnnaDrutschinin
This document discusses the use of Rio markers in reporting on financial flows under the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). It outlines the UNCCD's results-based governance framework and 10-year strategy, including strategic and operational objectives. It describes how affected countries, developed countries, and other entities report on progress indicators, performance indicators, and financial flows to the UNCCD. It explains that the Standard Financial Annex and Project and Programme Sheet have been merged into a Unified Financial Annex, reducing required fields by 70%. Rio markers from 0-3 are used to track what proportion of projects address UNCCD objectives. Financial analysis of reported data uses tables, charts and maps to show statistics on commitments
Mosuoe Letuma, Ministry of Energy, Meteorology and water affairs: Capacity de...NAPExpo 2014
Mosuoe Letuma, Ministry of Energy, Meteorology and water affairs: Capacity development plan for adaptation to climate variability and change in Lesotho
Addressing Financing in the National Adaptation Planning Process in Peru | Ab...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Vidya Soundarajan, Head of Action on Climate Today's India Programme, for a Targeted Topics Forum on financing National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes. This event was held in Mexico City in June 2017.
This document discusses adaptation planning support provided by the Green Climate Fund (GCF) Readiness Programme. It provides information on:
1) Progress of GCF Readiness support provided to date, with over $29 million approved for 75 countries across regions.
2) Key elements of the adaptation planning process, including country strategies/plans, GCF country programmes, entity work programmes, and project/programme pipelines.
3) Examples of outcomes supported through GCF adaptation planning funding, such as establishing effective adaptation governance coordination, strengthening climate impact analysis and information sharing, and developing financing action plans.
4) The adaptation planning proposal, review, and funding process managed through the GCF Readiness Programme.
Pillar 1: Presentation of the Implementation Plan | Liesl Wiese, GSP SecretariatFAO
This document outlines a plan for implementing Pillar 1 of the Global Soil Partnership, which focuses on promoting sustainable soil management (SSM) practices. The plan has four main activities: 1) Identifying and mapping best practices for SSM, 2) Implementing the World Soil Charter and Voluntary Guidelines for SSM, 3) Implementing demonstration projects for SSM, and 4) Providing guidance on assessing the sustainability of soil management practices. The total estimated budget for implementing this 4-year plan is $16.72 million, which will require contributions and support from GSP member countries and organizations.
This document outlines an investment plan roadmap for developing investment plans for the potato and rice value chains in Uganda. It begins by highlighting the importance of agriculture to Uganda's economy. It then discusses challenges facing the sector like low productivity and limited access to markets. The government has instituted policies to address these challenges. The objectives of the investment plans are to identify constraints, determine costs of interventions, expected returns on investments, and contributions to GDP growth. Stakeholder consultations and studies will be conducted to develop the plans using a methodology of mapping constraints, agreeing on interventions and costs. The plans will guide public and private sector investments to stimulate production, processing and market access.
Agricultural Transformation Agenda in GTP II
Presented by Dereje Biruk (ATA) at the Ethiopia - CGIAR Research Programs (CRPs) Country Collaboration and Site Integration Meeting, Addis Ababa, 11 December 2015
Strategy and framework for developing textcenafrica
This document proposes a five-year strategy and framework for the National Agricultural Research Organization of Uganda to develop climate change champions. The champions will generate and disseminate climate change information to help farmers adapt, and leverage support for climate change efforts locally and internationally. The strategy includes assessing current farmer adaptations, analyzing gaps, recruiting and training champions, creating a network of champions, and increasing climate change awareness. Champions will operate from NARO institutes but collaborate with climate data producers, audiences like farmers and policymakers, and the media. The strategy requires 3.5 million Ugandan shillings over five years to fund from NARO's budget, internally generated revenue, and donors. Progress will be monitored and evaluated using targeted indicators
The Climate-Smart Agriculture Project in Vietnam aims to: 1) provide an evidence base for identifying and implementing climate-smart agriculture practices and policies; 2) develop a strategic framework to guide climate-smart agriculture action and investment; 3) formulate climate-smart agriculture investment proposals; and 4) build capacity for climate-smart agriculture planning and implementation. The project focuses on the northern mountainous regions of Vietnam and priority areas including sustainable land management, crop diversification, and agroforestry. So far, the project has selected focal points, collected data, and begun research activities. Upcoming activities include further analyses of barriers to adoption, costs and benefits, and risks of climate-smart agriculture practices.
1. CCARDESA was established in 2011 by SADC to increase agricultural production and productivity in the region. It is governed by Ministers of Agriculture, a General Assembly, Board, and Secretariat.
2. CCARDESA's activities include institutional and human resource development, technology generation and dissemination, knowledge sharing, and capacity building. It has supported over 67 regional projects, trained over 200 people, and reached over 400,000 beneficiaries.
3. Impacts include improved food security, wealth creation, and changes to research management structures in some countries as a result of CCARDESA's work promoting collaboration.
The Technical Analytical Network (TAN) in Mozambique was established in 2017 to provide technical and analytical support for Mozambique's agriculture sector plans and goals. From 2017-2019, the TAN conducted several studies on topics like the impacts of climate change, seed systems, mechanization programs, and fertilizer value chains. The TAN also helped strengthen capacities for Mozambique's agriculture sector monitoring and evaluation. Moving forward, the TAN aims to establish regional branches, conduct more studies aligned with sector goals, and improve coordination to avoid duplication of efforts. Key challenges include building partnerships, resource mobilization, and setting up analytical networks in each development corridor.
The document summarizes development projects and knowledge management activities in Zambia. It outlines three key projects - a Rural Finance Programme, Smallholder Livestock Development Project, and Smallholder Agro Processing and Value Addition Programme. It then discusses policy dialogue, monitoring and evaluation, and implementation support activities. Several challenges are noted, including limited human resource capacity. Moving forward, focus areas include strengthening learning and knowledge sharing practices, communication strategies, and using monitoring data for documentation.
Support to strengthen institutional capacity to monitor poverty - environment...HanaTiti
This document provides an inception report for the "Support to Strengthen Institutional Capacity to Monitor Poverty - Environment Indicators" project. The project aims to strengthen monitoring and reporting systems for poverty-environment-livelihood indicators in Vietnam. It will do so through 4 parts: 1) Reviewing existing monitoring systems, 2) Developing a subset of indicators and monitoring guidelines, 3) Building institutional capacity, and 4) Completing a final report. The inception report outlines the initial progress, including stakeholder consultations, and lays out the objectives, outputs, activities and timelines for each project part. The goal is to improve the use of indicator data in policymaking and planning for sustainable development.
Pillar 2: Execution of the Implementation Plan | Lucrezia Caon, GSP SecretariatFAO
The document discusses the Soil Doctors Global Programme, which aims to build capacity for sustainable soil management among smallholder farmers. It does this by identifying and training "champion farmers", called Soil Doctors, to educate other farmers in their communities about soil science principles and sustainable practices. Soil Doctors would create a self-sufficient training system to promote sustainable soil management independently of financial resources. The programme also seeks to strengthen relations between farmers and organizations, and support soil data collection and monitoring. Details are provided on how to implement the programme, including manuals, education materials, and assessing critical soil parameters in the field with minimal equipment.
HelpAge Network Asia/Pacific Regional Conference Rapid Ageing: A Caring FutureHelpAge International
This document summarizes ESCAP's regional actions on population aging. It discusses:
1) ESCAP's role as the regional UN body addressing aging challenges in Asia-Pacific through knowledge sharing and promoting MIPAA implementation.
2) Key regional conferences and programs held by ESCAP on issues like health promotion, elderly care services, and MIPAA reviews.
3) A regional survey found most countries have aging plans but challenges remain around resources, capacity and gender policies.
4) The roadmap for MIPAA's 10-year review includes national reviews feeding into a 2012 regional meeting and the 2013 global Commission for Social Development review.
reference
document for all
CCARDESA
stakeholders who wish to know
how
CCARDESA
is governed. It a
ssures
d
evelopment
p
artners that
CCARDESA
observes the principles of good governance to which they are
bound in allocating their resources.
The Manual compliment
s
to
CCARDESA
’s
Charter
by
providing more
details on governance matters.
The Manual also seeks
to ensure transparency and efficient governance
that will maximise the efficient utilisation of the scarce human and financial
resources for the accomplishment of
CCARDESA
’s mandate while coping
with the change and growth in
CCARDESA
’s activities that are
anticipated,
especially in its early years.
The Manual will be subjected to
review and
approval by
the
CCARDESA
Board of Directors and endorsement by the
General Assembly
.
In the event of conflict between any provision of this Manual and the
CCARDESA Char
ter, the Charter shall prevail
Signed ccardesa charter_10_aug_2011_englishCCARDESA
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
R&D priorities for Southern Africa - Dr Monica MurataCCARDESA
Regional research needs are many & are determined by several factors:
Food security
Commercial value
Socio-economic value
Response to regional strategies
Regional priorities broad & representative of common national priorities
MILESTONES IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CCARDESACCARDESA
The process of establishing a sub-regional organisation (SRO), later known as CCARDESA, to coordinate agric R&D started in 2006 as part of the preparation of the SADC Multi-country Agricultural Productivity Programme (SADC MAPP)
SADC MAPP - a 15-year regional programme to translate into action Pillar 4 of CAADP and taking into account regional priorities in the RISDP of SADC and the 2004 Dar es Salaam Declaration on food security by SADC Heads of State.
A Steering Committee comprising 12 members from different SADC countries was appointed by the SADC Secretariat to help steer the process.
CCARDESA GA, The Objectives, Methodology and OutputsCCARDESA
The document outlines the objectives, methodology, and outputs of the CCARDESA General Assembly. CCARDESA is a sub-regional organization established by SADC member states to coordinate agricultural R&D programs and facilitate collaboration between national agricultural research systems, universities, and CGIAR centers. The General Assembly aims to receive stakeholder inputs, consider amendments to CCARDESA's charter, and recommend regional R&D priorities. It will use presentations, discussions, and networking events as its methodology and expects to share information, establish partnerships, approve strategic plans and auditors, and endorse governance agreements.
1.) Introduction
Our Movement is not new; it is the same as it was for Freedom, Justice, and Equality since we were labeled as slaves. However, this movement at its core must entail economics.
2.) Historical Context
This is the same movement because none of the previous movements, such as boycotts, were ever completed. For some, maybe, but for the most part, it’s just a place to keep your stable until you’re ready to assimilate them into your system. The rest of the crabs are left in the world’s worst parts, begging for scraps.
3.) Economic Empowerment
Our Movement aims to show that it is indeed possible for the less fortunate to establish their economic system. Everyone else – Caucasian, Asian, Mexican, Israeli, Jews, etc. – has their systems, and they all set up and usurp money from the less fortunate. So, the less fortunate buy from every one of them, yet none of them buy from the less fortunate. Moreover, the less fortunate really don’t have anything to sell.
4.) Collaboration with Organizations
Our Movement will demonstrate how organizations such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, National Urban League, Black Lives Matter, and others can assist in creating a much more indestructible Black Wall Street.
5.) Vision for the Future
Our Movement will not settle for less than those who came before us and stopped before the rights were equal. The economy, jobs, healthcare, education, housing, incarceration – everything is unfair, and what isn’t is rigged for the less fortunate to fail, as evidenced in society.
6.) Call to Action
Our movement has started and implemented everything needed for the advancement of the economic system. There are positions for only those who understand the importance of this movement, as failure to address it will continue the degradation of the people deemed less fortunate.
No, this isn’t Noah’s Ark, nor am I a Prophet. I’m just a man who wrote a couple of books, created a magnificent website: http://www.thearkproject.llc, and who truly hopes to try and initiate a truly sustainable economic system for deprived people. We may not all have the same beliefs, but if our methods are tried, tested, and proven, we can come together and help others. My website: http://www.thearkproject.llc is very informative and considerably controversial. Please check it out, and if you are afraid, leave immediately; it’s no place for cowards. The last Prophet said: “Whoever among you sees an evil action, then let him change it with his hand [by taking action]; if he cannot, then with his tongue [by speaking out]; and if he cannot, then, with his heart – and that is the weakest of faith.” [Sahih Muslim] If we all, or even some of us, did this, there would be significant change. We are able to witness it on small and grand scales, for example, from climate control to business partnerships. I encourage, invite, and challenge you all to support me by visiting my website.
Gamify it until you make it Improving Agile Development and Operations with ...Ben Linders
So many challenges, so little time. While we’re busy developing software and keeping it operational, we also need to sharpen the saw, but how? Gamification can be a way to look at how you’re doing and find out where to improve. It’s a great way to have everyone involved and get the best out of people.
In this presentation, Ben Linders will show how playing games with the DevOps coaching cards can help to explore your current development and deployment (DevOps) practices and decide as a team what to improve or experiment with.
The games that we play are based on an engagement model. Instead of imposing change, the games enable people to pull in ideas for change and apply those in a way that best suits their collective needs.
By playing games, you can learn from each other. Teams can use games, exercises, and coaching cards to discuss values, principles, and practices, and share their experiences and learnings.
Different game formats can be used to share experiences on DevOps principles and practices and explore how they can be applied effectively. This presentation provides an overview of playing formats and will inspire you to come up with your own formats.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
The importance of sustainable and efficient computational practices in artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning has become increasingly critical. This webinar focuses on the intersection of sustainability and AI, highlighting the significance of energy-efficient deep learning, innovative randomization techniques in neural networks, the potential of reservoir computing, and the cutting-edge realm of neuromorphic computing. This webinar aims to connect theoretical knowledge with practical applications and provide insights into how these innovative approaches can lead to more robust, efficient, and environmentally conscious AI systems.
Webinar Speaker: Prof. Claudio Gallicchio, Assistant Professor, University of Pisa
Claudio Gallicchio is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Computer Science of the University of Pisa, Italy. His research involves merging concepts from Deep Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Randomized Neural Systems, and he has co-authored over 100 scientific publications on the subject. He is the founder of the IEEE CIS Task Force on Reservoir Computing, and the co-founder and chair of the IEEE Task Force on Randomization-based Neural Networks and Learning Systems. He is an associate editor of IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (TNNLS).
This presentation by Tim Capel, Director of the UK Information Commissioner’s Office Legal Service, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Why Psychological Safety Matters for Software Teams - ACE 2024 - Ben Linders.pdfBen Linders
Psychological safety in teams is important; team members must feel safe and able to communicate and collaborate effectively to deliver value. It’s also necessary to build long-lasting teams since things will happen and relationships will be strained.
But, how safe is a team? How can we determine if there are any factors that make the team unsafe or have an impact on the team’s culture?
In this mini-workshop, we’ll play games for psychological safety and team culture utilizing a deck of coaching cards, The Psychological Safety Cards. We will learn how to use gamification to gain a better understanding of what’s going on in teams. Individuals share what they have learned from working in teams, what has impacted the team’s safety and culture, and what has led to positive change.
Different game formats will be played in groups in parallel. Examples are an ice-breaker to get people talking about psychological safety, a constellation where people take positions about aspects of psychological safety in their team or organization, and collaborative card games where people work together to create an environment that fosters psychological safety.
This presentation by Katharine Kemp, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law & Justice at UNSW Sydney, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Thibault Schrepel, Associate Professor of Law at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam University, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Juraj Čorba, Chair of OECD Working Party on Artificial Intelligence Governance (AIGO), was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Professor Giuseppe Colangelo, Jean Monnet Professor of European Innovation Policy, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “The Intersection between Competition and Data Privacy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 13 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/ibcdp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Nathaniel Lane, Associate Professor in Economics at Oxford University, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Legislation And Regulations For Import, Manufacture,.pptx
Medium Term Operational Plan (MTOP) - Simon Mwale - Programme & Grants Manager
1. THE CCARDESA MEDIUM TERM
OPERATIONAL PLAN (MTOP)
SIMON MWALE
Programme & Grants Manager
CCARDESA Secretariat
2. Outline
1. Why the MTOP?
2. Major factors in the development of MTOP
3. Process of developing the MTOP
4. The MTOP in Brief
5. Environment & social safeguards
6. Budget
7. Submission to the GA
3. Why the MTOP?
1. New organisation; established 2011
2. Need for a concise document outlining corporate
plan
3. Need for setting a technical operational path
4. Tool for supporting resource mobilisation to finance
the technical plans
4. Major factors in the development of MTOP
1. CAADP – especially Pillar 4
2. Framework for African Agricultural Productivity
(FAAP)
3. SADC Priority setting studies (2011 & 2012)
4. Multi-country Agricultural Productivity Programme
(MAPP) 15 year plans
5. Regional Indicative Strategic Development Plan
(RISDP) of SADC
6. Dar-es-salaam Declaration on Agriculture and
Food Security of SADC.
7. Draft Regional Agricultural Policy
5. Process of developing the MTOP
Research Priority
studies (2011-12)
Development of 2nd
Draft (2011)
Development of 1st
Draft (2011)
Consultations with
Board and Partners
(Nov 2012 – Feb 2013)
Development of 3rd
Draft
Regional Consultation with
stakeholders (April 2013)
Final Consultations
with Board & Partners
Regional
Consultations
Final MTOP
6. The MTOP in brief
1. Purpose: to provide a direction and framework
within which CCARDESA will operate in
fulfillment of its mandate
2. Holistic document for communicating to
partners
3. Basis for engaging with partners and funding
organisations
7. Thematic areas
1. Farmer empowerment market access
2. Technology generation and demand-driven
advisory services
3. Knowledge, information and communication
4. Institutional development and capacity building
5. Strengthening of CCARDESA Secretariat
8. Cross cutting issues
1. Gender
2. Health and nutrition, HIV and AIDS
3. Climate change
All cross cutting elements will be at the
centre of each Thematic Area and the
activities.
9. Monitoring and evaluation
1. Tracking of progress annually and taking appropriate
actions
2. MTOP has detailed Logical framework
3. Provides targets, indicators & means of verification
4. M&E framework has been developed on the basis of
MTOP log frame
5. Mid term and final evaluations
10. Environmental & social safeguards
1. Represents CCARDESA’s social and environmental
responsibilities
2. Safeguards against negative impact of activities
on natural resources/habitats, living organisms
and people
3. Adheres to global & regional conventions,
agreements
11. Budget (‘000 USD) over 5 years
Cost Centre Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
Thematic Area 1 5,398 2,365 1,536
Thematic Area 2 8,740 7,390 3,410
Thematic Area 3 1,536 1,536 1,313
Thematic Area 4 7,774 4,039 2,904
Thematic Area 5 2,885 2,885 2,885
HR & Admin 9,908 9,908 9,908
Contingency 2,634 1,925 1,217
TOTAL 38,876 30,048 23,293
12. Submission to the General Assembly
For Approval
by the GA
2011
2012 2013
7 May
2014
Studies, Drafting,
Consultations, Revisions,
Redrafting