The document discusses medical ethics regarding a patient named Patrick Dismuke. A committee reviewed Patrick's condition and symptoms to determine what treatment options would provide a quality of life. They considered that his status may temporarily improve after surgeries but would ultimately decline due to his body's tendencies. The committee acknowledged that a stomach transplant would unlikely be successful given Patrick's condition. The document examines the ethical considerations around determining appropriate care and quality of life for patients.

1. Medical Ethics
The discussion on Patrick Dismuke's condition concentrated on his incapability to improve. After reviewing his symptoms and considering possible
scenarios resulting from certain kinds of treatment, such as the tube that delivered nutrients into his veins that "broke the barrier between blood and
air" and became "a bacteria–laden Trojan horse, opening the door to infection", we attempted to come to a consensus on what would constitute a quality
life, as deliberated among the committee. We took into consideration that after every kind of surgery, his status would be temporarily improved but
ultimately decline in keeping with his body's proclivity. We acknowledged that the idea of a successful stomach transplant was remote since, as...show
more content...
As a result, the parents were afforded the time to see whether what they had decided for their child was an appropriate measure. Who's to say that some
of the complications with Taylor weren't attributable to Dr. Adcock when the book mentioned that Taylor had undergone breathing inconsistencies in
the ventilator while under Adcock's watch? In the end, Crandall proved to be the better care taker, despite her sense of detachment from the family.
Supportive Protocol I indicated that Taylor wouldn't be wean from the vent, wouldn't receive drugs or CPR if she had gone into cardiac arrest or
pulmonary arrest. If, in fact, Dr. Crandall had suggested to them that the prognosis for the baby was steady enough for recovery, any decision to have
had Taylor on the Protocol should have been rescinded, initially. However, Taylor's complications with her lungs triggered the complications with her
kidneys, as well as her brain. In the end, if Protocol was enforced, it could've possibly interfered with a natural occurrence. The legitimacy in
recognizing it as a natural occurrence could've possibly segued into debate, however, Taylor's present condition was unfolding from the moment she
was born 25 weeks
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Essay on What is Medical Ethics?
You might ask yourself what is Medical Ethics.Well Medical Ethics could many thing but mostly bad.It could rejection to health care at a hospitl by
doctor that dosent want help you. Maybe it might be because of you rase, skin color, just because he doesn't feel like it.If you make the doctor mad he
might deny and medical attention just because you made him mad. When becoming a doctor you take an oath, that oath states you treat all patients
equally what gains the doctor the right to treat patients differently.
Medical ethics could be so many different thing mostly bad.There's so many stories about medical ethics this this story about this girl. At the age of 13
she was diagnosed with a rare and fated type of cancer.The survived and was...show more content...
So they are allowed to do whatever they have to do to save their life or help them with their injury.If they a child or teen is hurt and not with a parent
the doctors can help them with minor thing but they have to do the fewer they can do before they get permission of their parents."Even when the
parent gives consent for a procedure, ED physicians should try to obtain assent from the patient. Again, the legal authority sometimes is at odds with
the ethical authority."(Ruben J. Rucoba).
Many doctors don't want want help a patient because he committed a crime or was in jail or even hurt someone.A doctor took an oath to help a
patient no matter what.There has been so much debate on if they should or shouldn't prisoners be help with medical care."Prison and jail health care,
despite occasional pockets of inspiration, provided by programs affiliated with academic institutions, is an arena of endless ethical conflict in which
health care providers must negotiate relentlessly with prison officials to provide necessary and decent care."(Duler)
Their still is conflict with Medical Ethics.Like "how should someone make medical decisions for someone who has never been competent?"
(Guidry–Grimes). "Well The doctor has a duty to obtain prior informed consent from the patient before carrying out diagnostic tests and therapeutic
management."(M.S.,Pandit.). Doctors at a hospital are trusted as a doctor
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Essay on Religion and Medical Ethics
Religion and Medical Ethics
I am discussing the issues that are put forward by Christians concerning the sanctity of life in relation to abortion and what their beliefs are. There are
no Biblical scriptures that deal directly with abortion; however I will refer to passages in the Bible that refer to life and other relevant areas. Abortion is
the termination of a pregnancy and can be defined as the deliberate destruction of a foetus, causing its death. The 1967 Abortion Act allows a woman
to terminate or end her pregnancy up to the 24th week; however there is no time limit if there is a high risk to her life or if the foetus has major
abnormalities. A woman must also have the permission or consent...show more content...
Another issue that you need to determine is 'When does life really begin?' Pro–choice people would say late in pregnancy, some would even say as late
as birth. Genesis 2:7 would agree with this in that it was after God breathed life in Adam that he became living. '. . . and breathed into his nostrils the
breath of life; and man became a living soul.' Genesis 2:7. While the pro–life people would say life begins at conception, right at the beginning.
Another verse from the Old Testament could be used in agreement to this. 'Thus saith the Lord that made thee, and formed thee from the womb . . .'
Isaiah 44:2. There is a keen debate concerning the moment a human embryo or foetus becomes fully human or when, according to Christian teaching, it
has both body and soul. Within the Church Christians generally want to follow the teachings and principles found within the Bible and then apply
them to the way they live. However this in not always easy due to the vast number of translations that are found today. It has lead to a variety of
viewpoints concerning the moral thoughts on abortion. Generally the Church is united in its condemnation of abortion. It is a decision that must be
taken very seriously and only in unusual circumstances when abortion is the lesser of two evils should it be carried out.
'Our belief in the sanctity of
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Patient-Physician Contract
Marisela Perez
Ms. Tan
Due Thursday, November 28th, 2010 1. Explain patient–physician contract
A physician has the right, after forming a contract or agreeing to accept a patient under his or her care, to make reasonable limitation on the contractual
relationship. The physician is under no legal obligation to treat patients who may wish to exceed those limitations. Under the patient–physician
contract, both parties have certain rights and responsibilities. 2. Patient right and responsibilities
Patients have the right to choose a physician; although some managed care plans may limit choices. Patients also have the right to terminate a
physician's services if they wish. 3. Patient responsibilities
Patients are also part of the...show more content...
11. When did HIPAA became a law? What are the goals of HIPAA?
On August 21, 1996, the U.S. Congress passed the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act(HIPAA). The primary goal of the act are to
improve the portability and continuity of health–care coverage in group and individual markets; to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in health–care
insurance and health–care delivery; to promote the use of medical savings account; to improve access to long–term care services and coverage; and to
simplify the administration of health insurance. 12. State three purpose of HIPAA
–Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of health–care delivery by creating a national framework for health privacy protection that builds on efforts
by states, health systems, and individual organizations and individuals.
–Protect and enhance the rights of patients by providing them access to their health information and controlling the inappropriate use or disclosure of
that information.
–Improve the quality of health care by restoring trust in the health–care system among consumers, health–care professionals, and the multitude of
organizations and individuals committed to the delivery of care. 13. What is HIPAA privacy rule?
The HIPAA Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information provide the comprehensive federal protection for the privacy of health
information. The privacy rule is
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. Medical Ethical Principles
THE PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS Throughout history the practice of medical ethics has drawn on a variety of philosophical concepts. One
such concept is deontology, a branch of ethical teaching centered on the idea that actions must be guided above all by adherence to clear principles,
such as respect for free will. In contemporary bioethics, the idea of autonomy has been of central importance in this tradition. Autonomy is the right of
individuals to determine their own fates and live their lives the way they choose, as long as they do not interfere with the rights of others. Other medical
ethicists have championed a principle known as utilitarianism, a moral framework in which actions are judged primarily by their results. Utilitarianism
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

6. Medical Ethics Essay
The Affordable Healthcare Act (AHA) in the US, which is similar to other countries' Universal Healthcare Systems (UHS), has been in the news again
recently. From the beginning the AHA has been passionately contested and debated from its introduction on the Senate floor to the challenge in the
Supreme Court that it was unconstitutional. The reforms that the AHA started in 2010, such as Health Insurance Companies can not deny someone
with a preexisting condition, or the recent troubles of the Health Insurance Marketplace website, AHA is something of a hot button issues that has US
citizens deeply divided on. At the heart of this divisive issue is Universal Healthcare something that should be provided by government for its citizens
or is it...show more content...
Plato's Republic, written as a dialog, Plato's main speaker and his former teacher, is Socrates throughout the work. In Republic we learn of Plato's
Concepts of Justice, Virtue, and what is good. Plato is considered one of the preeminent philosophers of his time and foremost contributors to the
studies of philosophy, political science, and psychology. His influences and works are the basis on which many philosophers from ancient Greece to
modern day use to construct their theories.
In the Republic, dialog between Socrates, Thrasymachus, and Glaucon convey to us what Plato classifies as good and classes of good, and what is
just and unjust. If we can describe what is "just" and "good" we can better determine what is the best course of action. Plato describes, Justice as a
virtue, "Justice is, at once a part of human virtue and the bond, which joins man together in society. It is the identical quality that makes good and
social. Justice is an order and duty of the parts of the soul, it is to the soul as health is to the body. Plato says that justice is not mere strength, but it is a
harmonious strength. Justice is not the right of the stronger but the effective harmony of the whole. All moral conceptions revolve about the good of
the whole–individual as well as social." (Bhandari). So it can be said that what is "just" and "good", in the Platonic sense, is good for the individual as
well as society. Plato then frames governance or the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

7. Medical Ethicism
The Medical ethicist has been an issue in public policy and needs attention. The concept of relationship between individuals' health and the government
policy is a challenge; for a long time, the healthcare policy in this area was not helpful. The Public policy still short in helping eliminates the disparity
among services to the elderly, disabled or less fortunate. Health care disparities have been prevalent among the general population; with access to
necessitous preventative and mental health care services being narrowly available. The issue was addressed disproportionately in the public health care
sectors; resulting in clear differences. Now going forward, what will be the underlying assurances reform for the vulnerable populations?
Get more content on HelpWriting.net