Matthew Bean Instructor Manager Email Author Week 3 (due by Feb 5) -- Reading Discussion Collapse Top of Form The reading assignment for this week is as follows: 1) Read Chapter 2: Language in the Rhetoric book 2) Read Franklin D. Roosevelt's First Inaugural Address, Speeches book pp 221-224 3) Read Franklin D. Roosevelt's War Message, Speeches book pp 269-270 *DISCUSSION QUESTIONS (10 points, due Wednesday, February 5 by 11:59pm) 1) Use the theory of linguistic relativity to analyze Roosevelt’s first inaugural address. 2) Using Roosevelt’s “War Message,” explain how language is used as symbolic action. 3) Compare and contrast the two speeches using the terms of the chapter. How are they similar? How are they different? Bottom of Form Running head: CRIMINAL JUSTICE Case Comparisons Tommy K. Bush Sr. Troy University CJ 2241 February 4, 2014 Introduction Criminal law generally refers to State and Federal laws which make certain that make certain behavior illegal and therefore punishable by either fines and/or imprisonment (Schopp, Weiner, Bornstein & Willborn, 2010). Criminal cases therefore, are charges which are followed by prosecutors for violations of criminal statutes. It is paramount that the law is always upheld in order not to compromise the legal system and also not to violate the rights of the perpetrator (Carmen, Ritter & Witt, 2008). In this particular instance, we are going to compare two cases which may have possibly infringed the 8th Amendment which awards every person to free from cruel and unusual punishment (Bourke & Loeb, 2008). Discussion Comparing the Hudson v. McMillian (90-6531) case and the Kennedy v. Louisiana (07- 343) case, it is quite obvious that in both, the rights of the inmate Mr. Keith Hudson and defendant, Mr. Patrick Kennedy’s 8th Amendment rights were violated (Schopp, et al, 2010). Mr. 4Hudson claimed that he was beaten by two Prison Guards namely, Marvin Woods and Jack McMillian as their supervisor, Mr. Arthur Mezo watched (Carmen, et al, 2008). On the other hand, a Louisiana Jury established that Mr. 1Patrick Kennedy was guilty of aggravated rape of his 8 year old step-daughter under the Louisiana aggravated rape statute (Bourke & Loeb, 2008). Facts In the Hudson and McMillian case, 2the District Court ruled that the Prison guards had definitely applied excessive force when there was no actual need to do so, therefore violating the 8th Amendment (Schopp, et al, 2010). This subsequently entitled Hudson 10to damages. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals however reversed the ruling citing that an inmate ought to lay bare ‘significant injury’ while claiming that his 8th Amendment rights have in one way or the other been violated due to the use of excessive force (Carmen, et al, 2008). On the other hand, the Kennedy v. Louisiana 8case, in a 2003 jury, the District Court established that Mr. Patrick Kennedy was guilty of the 1998 rape of his step-daughter who was 8 years old then; in line with the recommendatio ...