This document provides instructions for a debate match between two teams, Yes United and No FC. It outlines the roles of each participant, including referees, commentators, players, and substitutes. The match will consist of two 5-minute halves separated by a half-time break. Rules for the debate include only speaking when holding the ball and passing it between no more than 3 teammates before passing to the other team. Referees will track fouls while commentators score goals based on debate points. The winner will be determined by subtracting fouls from goals scored. An optional penalty shootout can be used if the game ends in a draw.
A debate is a discussion or structured contest about an issue or a resolution. A formal debate involves two sides: one supporting a resolution and one opposing it. Such a debate is bound by rules previously agreed upon. Debates may be judged in order to declare a winning side. Debates, in one form or another, are commonly used in democratic societies to explore and resolve issues and problems. Decisions at a board meeting, public hearing, legislative assembly, or local organization are often reached through discussion and debate.
The Monash Association of Debaters (MAD) Member Training Program 2010 presents:
CASE CONSTRUCTION TACTICS
by Tim Jeffrie, 2009 Australasian Intervarsity Debating Champion and Grand Finalist at the 2008 World University Debating Championships
Discusses strategies and approaches to constructing winning cases.
Presented as session 2, semester 1 in the Novice Stream.
A debate is a discussion or structured contest about an issue or a resolution. A formal debate involves two sides: one supporting a resolution and one opposing it. Such a debate is bound by rules previously agreed upon. Debates may be judged in order to declare a winning side. Debates, in one form or another, are commonly used in democratic societies to explore and resolve issues and problems. Decisions at a board meeting, public hearing, legislative assembly, or local organization are often reached through discussion and debate.
The Monash Association of Debaters (MAD) Member Training Program 2010 presents:
CASE CONSTRUCTION TACTICS
by Tim Jeffrie, 2009 Australasian Intervarsity Debating Champion and Grand Finalist at the 2008 World University Debating Championships
Discusses strategies and approaches to constructing winning cases.
Presented as session 2, semester 1 in the Novice Stream.
This slideshow was realised for the training session of the MUN Club at Charles de Gaulle International High School in Dijon (France). It provides recommendations for those wanting to chair committees
This slideshow was realised for the training session of the MUN Club at Charles de Gaulle International High School in Dijon (France). It provides recommendations for those wanting to chair committees
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
2. WARM UP
TIME: 15 MINUTES
Check the Match Roles poster and get into these groups:
• Referees and commentators
• Yes United players
• No FC players
• Split any substitutes between the two teams
Work with the teammates who have the same role as
you to prepare for the match debate. Read through your
instruction sheets and complete your warm up task.
3. GET INTO POSITION
TIME: 3 MINUTES
Look at this diagram and get into position.
Any substitutes can act as spectators.
F
F
M
M
M
D
G
S
S
F
F
M
M
M
D
G
S
S C CC
RR
R Referee
C Commentator
F Forward
M Midfielder
D Defender
G Goalie
S Substitute
WHAT DO THE
LETTERS MEAN?
WHAT DO THE
COLOURS MEAN?
No FC players
Yes United players
Match Judges
4. RULES
TIME: 5 MINUTES
• There will be two halves of 5 minutes each. At half time the
substitutes will swap in and replace some players.
• You can only speak if you have the football. Once you have
spoken you should pass the ball to the next person to
speak.
• There should be a maximum of three passes between each
team before you have to pass the ball to the other team.
• Referee: now read out the list of foul offences.
• Commentators: now read out the goal criteria.
• Flip a coin to pick who will begin.
5. FIRST HALF
TIME: 5 MINUTES OF DISCUSSION
Remember:
Maximum 3 passes between your team before
you have to pass to the other team.
Stick to your role!
6. HALF TIME
TIME: 5 MINUTES
Commentators:
feedback now
Make substitutions.
7. SECOND HALF
TIME: 5 MINUTES OF DISCUSSION
Remember:
Maximum 3 passes between your team before
you have to pass to the other team.
Stick to your role!
8. FULL TIME
TIME: 10 MINUTES OF DISCUSSION
Commentators:
Feedback on the goals scored and explain why you
awarded these goals. Who is ‘person of the match’?
Referees:
Total up the fouls and explain why. Take these points
away from the goals scored.
WHO HAS WON?
9. PENALTY
SHOOTOUT
(optional)
TIME: 5 MINUTES OF DISCUSSION
Was it a draw? You can do a penalty shoot-out.
Teams: pick your 3 best ‘strikers’ and 3 best arguments.
Strikers: one by one, go up to face the goalkeeper and say your argument.
Goalkeeper: you can save the goal by arguing directly against what has been said.
Teacher: after three attempts from each side, decide who has won and explain why.