Lincoln Douglas Debate
•Download as PPT, PDF•
4 likes•1,526 views
This document provides an overview of the key components of a Lincoln-Douglas debate case, including the introduction, definitions, value, points, and conclusion. It explains that the introduction should catch the judge's attention and lead into the resolution. Definitions of key terms should be provided and aim to make the most sense. The value is the most important principle by which the resolution is evaluated. Points, also called contentions, should specifically relate to the topic and value and be structured for maximum impact. The conclusion should emphasize the main point and value.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![1. The Introduction ,[object Object]]()
Recommended
Lincoln douglas debate intro
The document provides an overview of Lincoln-Douglas debate formats and procedures. It discusses that LD debates focus on values and individual vs. societal rights. Each debate follows a structured format with timed speeches where debaters argue both sides of a topic that changes every two months. Debaters present cases structured around a value premise and criteria, then rebut each other's arguments before a judge decides the winner. The document outlines the step-by-step process and guidelines debaters should follow to participate successfully in an LD debate tournament.
Debate preparation templates
This document provides guidelines for primary school students participating in a debate. It outlines the structure of a debate and templates for the three speakers on a debate team. The first speaker introduces the topic and outlines the team's arguments. The second speaker rebuts the opposing team's arguments and presents additional points for their side. The third speaker rebuts arguments from both opposing speakers and summarizes the main points made by their teammate speakers. The templates provide guidance on the key components to include such as introducing the topic, defining terms, presenting evidence to support arguments, and concluding remarks.
Basic debating skills
This document provides an overview of basic debating skills. It explains that a debate involves arguing for or against a topic using strict rules of conduct and sophisticated arguing techniques. A topic defines what will be debated, with an affirmative team arguing for the topic and a negative team arguing against it. Each debating team has three speakers with specified roles, such as defining the topic, presenting arguments, rebutting the opposing team's arguments, and summarizing their team's position. Speakers are evaluated on the substance of their arguments, how well they are organized and presented, and their public speaking mannerisms. The goal is to build a persuasive case using clear logic and examples while following proper debating protocols.
Advanced Debating Techniques
This document provides an overview of advanced debating techniques. It discusses the components of a basic argument: content, organization, and delivery. For organization, it recommends using the ARE structure of argument, reason, and evidence. For delivery, it recommends considering audibility, engagement, conviction, authority, and likability. It then discusses how to make arguments more persuasive through "chunking" - relating arguments to abstract principles, real-world examples, and analogies. It provides examples and recommends debaters practice these techniques to strengthen their persuasive abilities.
English Debate
The document provides an overview of the basics of debating, including what debating is and is not, the benefits of debating, qualities of a good debater, and key terms and concepts in debating. It discusses the structure of a debate with two teams of three members each taking opposing sides of a motion. It outlines the speech order and roles of each speaker, as well as concepts like definitions, theme lines, team splits, arguments, rebuttals, and adjudication. Adjudicators are instructed to assess the content, delivery, and organization of arguments to determine the winning team based on a marking scale and margin.
Oxford oregon debate
This document outlines the format and rules for an Oxford-style debate. It discusses the traditional debate structure used in various settings which involves two opposing sides - affirmative and negative. Each side has three speakers who give constructive speeches and rebuttals. The debate is moderated and judged based on evidence, delivery, responses to questions, and rebuttals. Specific guidelines are provided around constructing arguments, asking and answering questions during the debate, and providing rebuttals.
Intro to debate april 2013
This document provides an overview of the format and rules for middle school public debate programs. It explains that debates involve structured discussions between two opposing sides aimed at encouraging critical thinking, personal expression, and tolerance of differing opinions. Key aspects of debates covered include having a specific topic, clear proposition and opposition sides, and arguments supported by reasoning and evidence. The debate format involves five-minute constructive speeches from each side, followed by a ten-minute preparation period and three-minute rebuttals. Points of information and respectful heckling are also discussed.
Intro To University Debating
The Monash Association of Debaters (MAD) Member Training Program 2010 presents:
INTRODUCTION TO UNIVERSITY DEBATING
by Viv Jones, Top-10 Speaker and Semi-Finalist at the 2009 Australasian Intervarsity Debating Championships and Nita Rao, Semi-Finalist at the 2009 Australasian Intervarsity Debating Championships.
An introduction to debating at university, introducing the 3-on-3 debate format before moving on to general discussion about the importance of matter, manner and method in debates. Also covers definitions and a number of useful tips.
Presented as session 1, semester 1 in the Novice Stream and session 2, semester 1 in the Beginner Stream.
Recommended
Lincoln douglas debate intro
The document provides an overview of Lincoln-Douglas debate formats and procedures. It discusses that LD debates focus on values and individual vs. societal rights. Each debate follows a structured format with timed speeches where debaters argue both sides of a topic that changes every two months. Debaters present cases structured around a value premise and criteria, then rebut each other's arguments before a judge decides the winner. The document outlines the step-by-step process and guidelines debaters should follow to participate successfully in an LD debate tournament.
Debate preparation templates
This document provides guidelines for primary school students participating in a debate. It outlines the structure of a debate and templates for the three speakers on a debate team. The first speaker introduces the topic and outlines the team's arguments. The second speaker rebuts the opposing team's arguments and presents additional points for their side. The third speaker rebuts arguments from both opposing speakers and summarizes the main points made by their teammate speakers. The templates provide guidance on the key components to include such as introducing the topic, defining terms, presenting evidence to support arguments, and concluding remarks.
Basic debating skills
This document provides an overview of basic debating skills. It explains that a debate involves arguing for or against a topic using strict rules of conduct and sophisticated arguing techniques. A topic defines what will be debated, with an affirmative team arguing for the topic and a negative team arguing against it. Each debating team has three speakers with specified roles, such as defining the topic, presenting arguments, rebutting the opposing team's arguments, and summarizing their team's position. Speakers are evaluated on the substance of their arguments, how well they are organized and presented, and their public speaking mannerisms. The goal is to build a persuasive case using clear logic and examples while following proper debating protocols.
Advanced Debating Techniques
This document provides an overview of advanced debating techniques. It discusses the components of a basic argument: content, organization, and delivery. For organization, it recommends using the ARE structure of argument, reason, and evidence. For delivery, it recommends considering audibility, engagement, conviction, authority, and likability. It then discusses how to make arguments more persuasive through "chunking" - relating arguments to abstract principles, real-world examples, and analogies. It provides examples and recommends debaters practice these techniques to strengthen their persuasive abilities.
English Debate
The document provides an overview of the basics of debating, including what debating is and is not, the benefits of debating, qualities of a good debater, and key terms and concepts in debating. It discusses the structure of a debate with two teams of three members each taking opposing sides of a motion. It outlines the speech order and roles of each speaker, as well as concepts like definitions, theme lines, team splits, arguments, rebuttals, and adjudication. Adjudicators are instructed to assess the content, delivery, and organization of arguments to determine the winning team based on a marking scale and margin.
Oxford oregon debate
This document outlines the format and rules for an Oxford-style debate. It discusses the traditional debate structure used in various settings which involves two opposing sides - affirmative and negative. Each side has three speakers who give constructive speeches and rebuttals. The debate is moderated and judged based on evidence, delivery, responses to questions, and rebuttals. Specific guidelines are provided around constructing arguments, asking and answering questions during the debate, and providing rebuttals.
Intro to debate april 2013
This document provides an overview of the format and rules for middle school public debate programs. It explains that debates involve structured discussions between two opposing sides aimed at encouraging critical thinking, personal expression, and tolerance of differing opinions. Key aspects of debates covered include having a specific topic, clear proposition and opposition sides, and arguments supported by reasoning and evidence. The debate format involves five-minute constructive speeches from each side, followed by a ten-minute preparation period and three-minute rebuttals. Points of information and respectful heckling are also discussed.
Intro To University Debating
The Monash Association of Debaters (MAD) Member Training Program 2010 presents:
INTRODUCTION TO UNIVERSITY DEBATING
by Viv Jones, Top-10 Speaker and Semi-Finalist at the 2009 Australasian Intervarsity Debating Championships and Nita Rao, Semi-Finalist at the 2009 Australasian Intervarsity Debating Championships.
An introduction to debating at university, introducing the 3-on-3 debate format before moving on to general discussion about the importance of matter, manner and method in debates. Also covers definitions and a number of useful tips.
Presented as session 1, semester 1 in the Novice Stream and session 2, semester 1 in the Beginner Stream.
Debate seminar
The document outlines the roles and responsibilities of speakers in a debate seminar. It discusses the structure of the debate, including defining the motion, outlining arguments for and against the motion, rebutting the opposing team's arguments, and summarizing the key issues. Each speaker has a specific role, such as the first speaker introducing their team's position, definition, and arguments, while later speakers rebut arguments and reinforce their team's overall case. Good arguments provide a clear assertion, reasoning, evidence, and link back to the motion. Rebuttals should explain why the opposing team's arguments are weak rather than just making accusations. Adjudicators will assess the debate based on the substance of arguments, presentation style, and adherence
Debate notes and format w rubric
This document provides information and instructions for participating in a debate. It discusses the key differences between negotiation and debate, offers tips for effective negotiation techniques, and outlines the debate format and process. The debate topics center around claims such as whether men or women are better at certain things. Guidelines are provided for researching the topics, preparing arguments, the structure of the debate rounds, and how participants will be scored. The goal is to have students engage in civil discourse to argue for or against various statements or resolutions.
Debate 101 oktafia
Combining from many sources specially the ones I get from English Debate Society of Universitas Bakrie, here's the Debate 101 presentation that I usually used in my coaching or teaching activities.
JCI Debating - Speak on your feet
The document provides guidance on the art of debating, including the basic elements, procedures, roles, and techniques involved. It discusses setting up a debate with a motion, government and opposition sides, time constraints, and a jury. It offers tips on phrasing the motion, determining the scope of controversy, presenting arguments, refuting opposing arguments, evaluating a debate, and preparing for a debate through brainstorming and role assignment.
What is debating
This document provides an introduction to debating. It defines a debate as a structured argument where two sides alternately speak for and against a proposition. It highlights that debating helps improve speaking skills by providing experience developing convincing arguments from different perspectives. The document outlines basic debating skills like style, speed, tone, volume, and clarity. It also discusses the importance of focusing on the opposing side's position and limiting arguments to three points or less supported by logic and evidence. Finally, it lists nine principles of good debating including keeping discussions professional and focusing on substance over personal attacks.
How to debate
This document provides instructions on how to debate effectively. It discusses what a debate is, why people debate, and basic debating skills. The skills covered include style, speed, tone, volume, clarity, use of notes, eye contact, content, case structure, and rebuttal techniques. The document emphasizes the importance of presenting arguments in a clear, logical, and evidence-based manner while also engaging with the audience. Debates involve structuring an argument, supporting various positions, and systematically addressing opposing views.
Debate
This document provides information about debate strategies and structure. It discusses the goals of a debate to convince the audience of one side's argument. It outlines five debate strategies: 1) refer back to your argument tag, 2) explain your argument, 3) characterize your opponent's response fairly, 4) resolve the issue by showing why you are right, and 5) impact the importance of winning the argument. It also describes the roles and order of speakers in a debate competition, including an affirmative and negative first speaker, rebuttals from second speakers, and a focus on rebuttal for third speakers. Adjudicators consider debates based on manner, matter, and method.
What is Oxford -O
The document outlines the traditional format for debates. It describes the structure, including the order of speeches between the affirmative and negative sides. Each side has three speakers who give constructive speeches and responses. The debate is judged based on evidence, delivery, responses to questions, and rebuttals. Logical fallacies that should be avoided in arguments are also defined.
BASIC DEBATING SKILLS
A debate is a discussion or structured contest about an issue or a resolution. A formal debate involves two sides: one supporting a resolution and one opposing it. Such a debate is bound by rules previously agreed upon. Debates may be judged in order to declare a winning side. Debates, in one form or another, are commonly used in democratic societies to explore and resolve issues and problems. Decisions at a board meeting, public hearing, legislative assembly, or local organization are often reached through discussion and debate.
Teaching debate skills
The document summarizes a presentation on incorporating debate into English language teaching. It discusses what debate is, the skills it helps develop, how to design a debate-focused syllabus, and tips for structuring classroom debates. Debate involves arguing for or against a resolution and helps improve students' critical thinking, research, public speaking and listening skills. The presentation provides examples of debate topics and structures for classroom debates, as well as suggestions for supporting arguments and developing counterarguments.
Debating
The document provides tips for effective debating strategies. It advises to remain calm and on topic, thoroughly research arguments, and use examples and stories appropriately. Debaters should be aware of time limits and present information in a logical, appropriate manner without introducing new points in their closing statement. Working as a team and addressing all opposing arguments is important for a successful debate.
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
This document outlines the rules and guidelines for a debate using the Oxford-Oregon format on the proposition of adopting a parliamentary form of government. It details the structure of the debate with three speakers on each side, the allotted time limits, judging criteria, and tips for constructive speeches, cross-examination, and rebuttals. The roles of the moderator and timer are also defined.
Huckabee debate notes and format 3 w rubric (2)
Debate notes for high school public speaking - very basic but easy to follow. Also good for English 1 and English 2.
How to write a debate outline
1) The document provides guidance on how to write an effective debate outline, including identifying the debate format, doing thorough research, following outlining principles, structuring the case and potential rebuttals, and avoiding logical fallacies.
2) It recommends identifying the debate format which determines the structure, doing research to find solid evidence for arguments and potential counterarguments, and outlining the case with a strong introduction, body, and conclusion.
3) The document also cautions about logical fallacies to avoid such as straw man arguments, slippery slopes, ad hominem attacks, and relying on anecdotes instead of evidence.
Structure of Debate
This document provides guidance on how to approach a debate as a theatrical performance with different roles. It outlines the structure as a 3 act play with construction and cross-examination in Act 1, rebuttal in Act 2, and rejoinder in Act 3. Each role is described, including tips for success. General advice is given around rehearsal, body language, vocal delivery, and avoiding common pitfalls. The overall message is that debate requires preparation, rehearsal, and embracing the performance aspects of each role.
Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)
The document outlines the traditional format for debates, including the roles of the affirmative and negative sides in proving or disproving the debate proposition. It also details the structure of speeches and interpellations, as well as guidelines and best practices for participants. Key aspects include three speakers from each side, with constructive and rebuttal speeches of limited time periods, and interpellations between speeches where participants can ask questions.
Debating
This document provides tips and strategies for participating in a debate. It discusses important debate terminology like affirmative, negative, and argument. It offers dos and don'ts for debating such as staying calm, clearly defining the resolution, thoroughly researching your position, being aware of time constraints, and addressing all rebuttals. The document also discusses different types of debates like congressional debate, Lincoln-Douglas debate, parliamentary debate, and public forum debate.
Debate middle school
The document provides information about debate and persuasive speaking. It discusses what debate is, including that it is a discussion of opposing viewpoints intended to persuade an audience. It outlines the structure of a formal debate, including the roles of the affirmative and negative sides and the types of arguments each makes. It also gives examples of debate topics and provides guidance on developing effective speaking and reasoning skills for debates.
Debate
The document discusses different types of debates, including the Lincoln-Douglas debate, rebuttal debate, and Oregon-Oxford debate. It explains the typical structure and flow of an Oregon-Oxford debate, which involves three speakers from each side presenting arguments and rebuttals. The document also outlines important concepts in debating like issues, aspects to debate (necessity, beneficiality, practicability), speaker roles, and common fallacies to avoid in arguments.
Debate 2012 july (1)
This document provides guidance on how to structure an effective debate. It discusses establishing an opinion or resolution, building a case with reasons and evidence, organizing the presentation of one's opinion, refuting the other side's arguments, and strategies for the concluding rebuttal. Key components include outlining an introduction, multiple main points supported by explanations and examples, and a conclusion that recaps one's overall position. The document also provides an example debate format and guidelines for judges to evaluate the logic, speaking style, and organization of each team.
Rogerian argumentpp[1]
The document discusses three common approaches to argumentation - the Classical, Toulmin, and Rogerian approaches. It then focuses on explaining the key principles and structure of the Rogerian approach. The five key elements of a Rogerian argument are: 1) a brief, objective statement of the issue; 2) exploring common ground; 3) a complete description of the opposing position; 4) a complete description of your own position; 5) presenting a solution that considers both positions and finds compromise. The goal of the Rogerian approach is to have a less confrontational discussion through understanding different perspectives and finding common ground.
Scaffolding Persuasive Writing
The document outlines the steps for persuasive writing:
1. Establish a situation by introducing the topic and your position on the topic.
2. Include pertinent evidence from research to support your position.
3. Create an organizing structure such as numbered paragraphs to develop your argument in a logical way.
4. Provide a sense of closure by restating your position and the main points that support it.
More Related Content
What's hot
Debate seminar
The document outlines the roles and responsibilities of speakers in a debate seminar. It discusses the structure of the debate, including defining the motion, outlining arguments for and against the motion, rebutting the opposing team's arguments, and summarizing the key issues. Each speaker has a specific role, such as the first speaker introducing their team's position, definition, and arguments, while later speakers rebut arguments and reinforce their team's overall case. Good arguments provide a clear assertion, reasoning, evidence, and link back to the motion. Rebuttals should explain why the opposing team's arguments are weak rather than just making accusations. Adjudicators will assess the debate based on the substance of arguments, presentation style, and adherence
Debate notes and format w rubric
This document provides information and instructions for participating in a debate. It discusses the key differences between negotiation and debate, offers tips for effective negotiation techniques, and outlines the debate format and process. The debate topics center around claims such as whether men or women are better at certain things. Guidelines are provided for researching the topics, preparing arguments, the structure of the debate rounds, and how participants will be scored. The goal is to have students engage in civil discourse to argue for or against various statements or resolutions.
Debate 101 oktafia
Combining from many sources specially the ones I get from English Debate Society of Universitas Bakrie, here's the Debate 101 presentation that I usually used in my coaching or teaching activities.
JCI Debating - Speak on your feet
The document provides guidance on the art of debating, including the basic elements, procedures, roles, and techniques involved. It discusses setting up a debate with a motion, government and opposition sides, time constraints, and a jury. It offers tips on phrasing the motion, determining the scope of controversy, presenting arguments, refuting opposing arguments, evaluating a debate, and preparing for a debate through brainstorming and role assignment.
What is debating
This document provides an introduction to debating. It defines a debate as a structured argument where two sides alternately speak for and against a proposition. It highlights that debating helps improve speaking skills by providing experience developing convincing arguments from different perspectives. The document outlines basic debating skills like style, speed, tone, volume, and clarity. It also discusses the importance of focusing on the opposing side's position and limiting arguments to three points or less supported by logic and evidence. Finally, it lists nine principles of good debating including keeping discussions professional and focusing on substance over personal attacks.
How to debate
This document provides instructions on how to debate effectively. It discusses what a debate is, why people debate, and basic debating skills. The skills covered include style, speed, tone, volume, clarity, use of notes, eye contact, content, case structure, and rebuttal techniques. The document emphasizes the importance of presenting arguments in a clear, logical, and evidence-based manner while also engaging with the audience. Debates involve structuring an argument, supporting various positions, and systematically addressing opposing views.
Debate
This document provides information about debate strategies and structure. It discusses the goals of a debate to convince the audience of one side's argument. It outlines five debate strategies: 1) refer back to your argument tag, 2) explain your argument, 3) characterize your opponent's response fairly, 4) resolve the issue by showing why you are right, and 5) impact the importance of winning the argument. It also describes the roles and order of speakers in a debate competition, including an affirmative and negative first speaker, rebuttals from second speakers, and a focus on rebuttal for third speakers. Adjudicators consider debates based on manner, matter, and method.
What is Oxford -O
The document outlines the traditional format for debates. It describes the structure, including the order of speeches between the affirmative and negative sides. Each side has three speakers who give constructive speeches and responses. The debate is judged based on evidence, delivery, responses to questions, and rebuttals. Logical fallacies that should be avoided in arguments are also defined.
BASIC DEBATING SKILLS
A debate is a discussion or structured contest about an issue or a resolution. A formal debate involves two sides: one supporting a resolution and one opposing it. Such a debate is bound by rules previously agreed upon. Debates may be judged in order to declare a winning side. Debates, in one form or another, are commonly used in democratic societies to explore and resolve issues and problems. Decisions at a board meeting, public hearing, legislative assembly, or local organization are often reached through discussion and debate.
Teaching debate skills
The document summarizes a presentation on incorporating debate into English language teaching. It discusses what debate is, the skills it helps develop, how to design a debate-focused syllabus, and tips for structuring classroom debates. Debate involves arguing for or against a resolution and helps improve students' critical thinking, research, public speaking and listening skills. The presentation provides examples of debate topics and structures for classroom debates, as well as suggestions for supporting arguments and developing counterarguments.
Debating
The document provides tips for effective debating strategies. It advises to remain calm and on topic, thoroughly research arguments, and use examples and stories appropriately. Debaters should be aware of time limits and present information in a logical, appropriate manner without introducing new points in their closing statement. Working as a team and addressing all opposing arguments is important for a successful debate.
Rules and Guidelines on Debate Competition
This document outlines the rules and guidelines for a debate using the Oxford-Oregon format on the proposition of adopting a parliamentary form of government. It details the structure of the debate with three speakers on each side, the allotted time limits, judging criteria, and tips for constructive speeches, cross-examination, and rebuttals. The roles of the moderator and timer are also defined.
Huckabee debate notes and format 3 w rubric (2)
Debate notes for high school public speaking - very basic but easy to follow. Also good for English 1 and English 2.
How to write a debate outline
1) The document provides guidance on how to write an effective debate outline, including identifying the debate format, doing thorough research, following outlining principles, structuring the case and potential rebuttals, and avoiding logical fallacies.
2) It recommends identifying the debate format which determines the structure, doing research to find solid evidence for arguments and potential counterarguments, and outlining the case with a strong introduction, body, and conclusion.
3) The document also cautions about logical fallacies to avoid such as straw man arguments, slippery slopes, ad hominem attacks, and relying on anecdotes instead of evidence.
Structure of Debate
This document provides guidance on how to approach a debate as a theatrical performance with different roles. It outlines the structure as a 3 act play with construction and cross-examination in Act 1, rebuttal in Act 2, and rejoinder in Act 3. Each role is described, including tips for success. General advice is given around rehearsal, body language, vocal delivery, and avoiding common pitfalls. The overall message is that debate requires preparation, rehearsal, and embracing the performance aspects of each role.
Oxford – Oregon Debate (How to's and tips)
The document outlines the traditional format for debates, including the roles of the affirmative and negative sides in proving or disproving the debate proposition. It also details the structure of speeches and interpellations, as well as guidelines and best practices for participants. Key aspects include three speakers from each side, with constructive and rebuttal speeches of limited time periods, and interpellations between speeches where participants can ask questions.
Debating
This document provides tips and strategies for participating in a debate. It discusses important debate terminology like affirmative, negative, and argument. It offers dos and don'ts for debating such as staying calm, clearly defining the resolution, thoroughly researching your position, being aware of time constraints, and addressing all rebuttals. The document also discusses different types of debates like congressional debate, Lincoln-Douglas debate, parliamentary debate, and public forum debate.
Debate middle school
The document provides information about debate and persuasive speaking. It discusses what debate is, including that it is a discussion of opposing viewpoints intended to persuade an audience. It outlines the structure of a formal debate, including the roles of the affirmative and negative sides and the types of arguments each makes. It also gives examples of debate topics and provides guidance on developing effective speaking and reasoning skills for debates.
Debate
The document discusses different types of debates, including the Lincoln-Douglas debate, rebuttal debate, and Oregon-Oxford debate. It explains the typical structure and flow of an Oregon-Oxford debate, which involves three speakers from each side presenting arguments and rebuttals. The document also outlines important concepts in debating like issues, aspects to debate (necessity, beneficiality, practicability), speaker roles, and common fallacies to avoid in arguments.
Debate 2012 july (1)
This document provides guidance on how to structure an effective debate. It discusses establishing an opinion or resolution, building a case with reasons and evidence, organizing the presentation of one's opinion, refuting the other side's arguments, and strategies for the concluding rebuttal. Key components include outlining an introduction, multiple main points supported by explanations and examples, and a conclusion that recaps one's overall position. The document also provides an example debate format and guidelines for judges to evaluate the logic, speaking style, and organization of each team.
What's hot (20)
Similar to Lincoln Douglas Debate
Rogerian argumentpp[1]
The document discusses three common approaches to argumentation - the Classical, Toulmin, and Rogerian approaches. It then focuses on explaining the key principles and structure of the Rogerian approach. The five key elements of a Rogerian argument are: 1) a brief, objective statement of the issue; 2) exploring common ground; 3) a complete description of the opposing position; 4) a complete description of your own position; 5) presenting a solution that considers both positions and finds compromise. The goal of the Rogerian approach is to have a less confrontational discussion through understanding different perspectives and finding common ground.
Scaffolding Persuasive Writing
The document outlines the steps for persuasive writing:
1. Establish a situation by introducing the topic and your position on the topic.
2. Include pertinent evidence from research to support your position.
3. Create an organizing structure such as numbered paragraphs to develop your argument in a logical way.
4. Provide a sense of closure by restating your position and the main points that support it.
Writing the Persuasive Essay What is a persuasiveargum.docx
Writing the Persuasive Essay
What is a persuasive/argument essay?
In persuasive writing, a writer takes a position FOR or AGAINST an issue and writes to
convince the reader to believe or do something
Persuasive writing, also known as the argument essay, utilizes logic and reason to show that
one idea is more legitimate than another idea. It attempts to persuade a reader to adopt a
certain point of view or to take a particular action. The argument must always use sound
reasoning and solid evidence by stating facts, giving logical reasons, using examples, and
quoting experts.
When planning a persuasive essay, follow these steps
1. Choose your position. Which side of the issue or problem are you going to write about,
and what solution will you offer? Know the purpose of your essay.
2. Analyze your audience. Decide if your audience agrees with you, is neutral, or
disagrees with your position.
3. Research your topic. A persuasive essay must provide specific and convincing
evidence. Often it is necessary to go beyond your own knowledge and experience. You
might need to go to the library or interview people who are experts on your topic.
4. Structure your essay. Figure out what evidence you will include and in what order you
will present the evidence. Remember to consider your purpose, your audience, and
your topic.
The following criteria are essential to produce an effective argument
• Be well informed about your topic. To add to your knowledge of a topic, read
thoroughly about it, using legitimate sources. Take notes.
• Test your thesis. Your thesis, i.e., argument, must have two sides. It must be
debatable. If you can write down a thesis statement directly opposing your own, you
will ensure that your own argument is debatable.
• Disprove the opposing argument. Understand the opposite viewpoint of your position
and then counter it by providing contrasting evidence or by finding mistakes and
inconsistencies in the logic of the opposing argument.
• Support your position with evidence. Remember that your evidence must appeal to
reason.
Parts of the Persuasive Essay
1. The Introduction
The introduction has a "hook or grabber" to catch the reader's attention. Some
"grabbers" include:
1. Opening with an unusual detail: (Manitoba, because of its cold climate, is not thought of as
a great place to be a reptile. Actually, it has the largest seasonal congregation of garter
snakes in the world!)
2. Opening with a strong statement: (Cigarettes are the number one cause of lighter sales in
Canada!)
3. Opening with a Quotation: (Elbert Hubbard once said , "Truth is stronger than fiction.")
4. Opening with an Anecdote: An anecdote can provide an amusing and attention-getting
opening if it is short and to the point.
5. Opening with a Statistic or Fact: Sometimes a statistic or fact will add emphasis or interest
to your topic. It may be wise to include the item's .
Dean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorism
Dean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorismRiverside County Office of Education
The document is a lesson plan for teaching students how to critically analyze persuasive texts. It discusses different types of evidence an author may use to support their claim, including statistical, testimonial, anecdotal, and analogical evidence. It also warns students about logical fallacies authors may use, specifically mentioning the false dichotomy fallacy where only two options are presented when more likely exist. The lesson encourages students to separate an author's argument from unnecessary language and identify the primary claim being made and whether sufficient evidence is provided to support it.Writing the persuasive essay
The document provides guidance on writing a persuasive essay. It explains that a persuasive essay takes a position for or against an issue to convince the reader. It should use sound reasoning and evidence from credible sources. When planning a persuasive essay, the writer should choose a position, analyze the audience, research the topic, and structure the essay. The introduction should grab the reader's attention and state the thesis. The body paragraphs should each present a reason to support the thesis and consider opposing viewpoints. The conclusion should restate the thesis and main points and call the reader to action.
Power Point Presentation on Editorial Writing
This document provides guidance on writing editorials. It defines an editorial as presenting the views of a newspaper on an issue through reasoned arguments. Editorials should take a clear position, support it with evidence, consider opposing views, and propose solutions. They typically follow a formula of introducing an issue, stating a position, providing supporting reasons, addressing counterarguments, and concluding with a call to action. The document also discusses different types of editorials and offers tips for effective editorial writing.
EAPP.WRITING A POSITION PAPER.pptx
This document provides instructions for writing a position paper. It explains that a position paper presents the writer's stance on an issue and includes outlining arguments and a proposed course of action. It is more complex than a persuasive essay. The document notes that taking a position implies favoring one side of an issue. It also lists criteria for choosing an issue, such as ensuring it is controversial with multiple positions and narrow enough in scope. The document outlines the typical sections of a position paper, including introduction, body with arguments and evidence, and conclusion to summarize the stance.
Argumentative Writing
This document provides an overview of argumentative writing elements and structures for students in a WRIT 122 college course. It defines key elements like claims, reasons, evidence and addressing opposition. It also explains the structures of Toulmin, classical and Rogerian arguments, highlighting their different components and approaches. The document aims to help students learn and apply these concepts in their own argumentative writing.
Lecture on writing argumentative essays ppt
The document provides guidance on writing argumentative essays. It discusses choosing a debatable topic, developing a clear thesis statement, addressing counterarguments, and organizing the essay. The key points are:
- Choose a topic that allows for reasonable arguments on both sides rather than being a statement of fact. A good thesis directly answers the assignment question with a clear position and forecast of evidence.
- Anticipate opposing views and address them in the essay to demonstrate a well-rounded understanding and weaken those counterarguments.
- The essay should be organized logically, either by refuting counterarguments before stating the thesis, or presenting the thesis and evidence first before addressing objections.
1Paper #1 Topic (Capital Punishment)Argument· If A Then B.docx
1
Paper #1 Topic (Capital Punishment)Argument
· If A Then B
· If capital punishment is an appropriate expression of the anger society feels about horrible crimes, and it is simply what such criminals deserve then, capital punishment is morally right.
· A
· capital punishment is an appropriate expression of the anger society feels about horrible crimes, and it is simply what such criminals deserve.
· Therefore, B
· Therefore, capital punishment is morally right.
The Point of the Paper
Your paper is a
critical evaluation of the argument
that someone (you or someone else) gives in support of his or her position on this problem.
It is NOT a discussion of the conclusion, or of the second premise.
Common ProblemsReally a paper “pro-and-con” the conclusionDid not evaluate the argumentOnly discussed premise two, reallyJustified Premise One, then abandoned itDid not try hard enough to understand what the theory is and how it worksJustifications that simply restate the argument in more wordsSAY WHAT YOU ARE WRITING ABOUT!!
For your introduction, describe and explain the problem that gives rise to the argument you are discussing. DO NOT explain the argument, summarize the argument, or repeat the argument.
Explain what the problem is that you are trying to solve
(or that the person whose argument you are discussing is trying to solve). Discuss why this particular subject is a problem, give a little history to set up the problem, etc. This section is usually two or three paragraphs.
Position – one sentence!At the end of your introduction, it is natural to point out that there is a position that you (or someone else) takes on the problem. For example, if you are going to discuss your argument against the teaching of values in our schools, you would assert here that you are against it. On the other hand, if you are going to discuss William Bennett's argument in favor of such teaching, you would point out here that he is in favor of it. The point here is that your paper is about an argument that supports some position on the problem you have outlined in the introduction. State that position here. You should note two important things: the position stated here should be exactly the conclusion of the argument in the next section, and this is not the place to express your opinion. You may, in fact, disagree with the position defended by the argument that your paper is about, and it is fine to point that out here, but do so in one sentence only. For example, you might say: "Bennett's position on this subject is that values should be taught in schools. I am, however, opposed." This part of the paper is normally one or two sentences long.
ARGUMENTImmediately following the position statement you should present the argument that supports the position (either yours or someone else's). It should be presented with numbered premises and a conclusion that is also numbered. There should be a horizontal line separating the premises from the con.
1Paper #1 Topic (Capital Punishment)Argument· If A Then B.docx
1
Paper #1 Topic (Capital Punishment)Argument
· If A Then B
· If capital punishment is an appropriate expression of the anger society feels about horrible crimes, and it is simply what such criminals deserve then, capital punishment is morally right.
· A
· capital punishment is an appropriate expression of the anger society feels about horrible crimes, and it is simply what such criminals deserve.
· Therefore, B
· Therefore, capital punishment is morally right.
The Point of the Paper
Your paper is a
critical evaluation of the argument
that someone (you or someone else) gives in support of his or her position on this problem.
It is NOT a discussion of the conclusion, or of the second premise.
Common ProblemsReally a paper “pro-and-con” the conclusionDid not evaluate the argumentOnly discussed premise two, reallyJustified Premise One, then abandoned itDid not try hard enough to understand what the theory is and how it worksJustifications that simply restate the argument in more wordsSAY WHAT YOU ARE WRITING ABOUT!!
For your introduction, describe and explain the problem that gives rise to the argument you are discussing. DO NOT explain the argument, summarize the argument, or repeat the argument.
Explain what the problem is that you are trying to solve
(or that the person whose argument you are discussing is trying to solve). Discuss why this particular subject is a problem, give a little history to set up the problem, etc. This section is usually two or three paragraphs.
Position – one sentence!At the end of your introduction, it is natural to point out that there is a position that you (or someone else) takes on the problem. For example, if you are going to discuss your argument against the teaching of values in our schools, you would assert here that you are against it. On the other hand, if you are going to discuss William Bennett's argument in favor of such teaching, you would point out here that he is in favor of it. The point here is that your paper is about an argument that supports some position on the problem you have outlined in the introduction. State that position here. You should note two important things: the position stated here should be exactly the conclusion of the argument in the next section, and this is not the place to express your opinion. You may, in fact, disagree with the position defended by the argument that your paper is about, and it is fine to point that out here, but do so in one sentence only. For example, you might say: "Bennett's position on this subject is that values should be taught in schools. I am, however, opposed." This part of the paper is normally one or two sentences long.
ARGUMENTImmediately following the position statement you should present the argument that supports the position (either yours or someone else's). It should be presented with numbered premises and a conclusion that is also numbered. There should be a horizontal line separating the premises from the con ...
Elements of persuasive or argument writing
The document provides guidance on writing a persuasive essay or paper. It explains that a persuasive essay attempts to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint using sound reasoning and evidence. It should introduce the topic and thesis, state facts of the case, prove the thesis with arguments, disprove opposing arguments, and conclude. The thesis usually appears at the end of the introduction as a one sentence summary. The essay should explain the topic, give supporting facts cited from sources, present facts building the strongest argument last, and conclude by restating why the audience should be persuaded. When planning, the writer should choose a position, analyze the audience, research the topic, and structure the essay.
Writing a Persuasive Paragraph or Essay Choose a deba.docx
Writing a Persuasive Paragraph or Essay
Choose a debatable topic
A debatable topic has two valid arguments. Your topic should be one about which you know something. The more
evidence you can provide, the more likely you are to sway your audience. You must plan on doing research and your
essay must be documented properly.
Formulate an argumentative thesis
Some topics have been discussed so often they are tired, uninteresting and not worthy of discussion. Choose a
current topic. Because the purpose of a persuasive essay is to convince readers to accept your position, your thesis
must take a stand. One way to make sure that your thesis actually does take a stand is to formulate an antithesis, a
statement that takes an arguable position opposite from yours.
Define your terms
You must make clear the terms you use in your argument. Be careful to use precise language in your thesis, avoiding
vague words such as wrong, bad, right and immoral, which convey different meaning to different people.
Accommodate your audience
Who are your readers? Are they unbiased observers or people deeply concerned about the issue you are discussing?
Are they skeptical, hostile, emotional or unconcerned? How will you convince each type?
Consider opposing arguments
You must know how to refute opposing arguments. Do this by showing that opposing views are untrue, unfair,
illogical, unimportant or irrelevant. Discuss the limitations of the opposing view. When you acknowledge an
opposing view, do not distort it or present it as ridiculously weak. This tactic, called creating a straw man, could
seriously undermine your credibility.
Gather evidence
Build your argument on assertions, claims you make about a debatable topic backed by evidence which is
supporting information in the form of examples, statistics or expert opinion. Document your evidence carefully.
Establish your credibility
Establish your credibility by finding common ground, demonstrating knowledge, and maintaining a reasonable tone.
Demonstrate knowledge about your subject by personal experiences and research. Make certain that you document
source material very carefully. For your instructor, an undocumented quotation or even an incorrect date can call an
entire paper into question. Use reasonable language, not emotionally charged language that will turn away the
reader.
Present your points fairly
Avoid distorting evidence and quoting out of context. In other words, be honest.
Don’t Apologize
Never suggest that you don't know what you're talking about or that you're not enough of an expert in this subject
that your opinion would matter. Avoid phrases like, "In my humble opinion....I'm not sure, but....." Make a BOLD
statement and proceed with confidence!
Don’t Refer to Yourself
Do not announce what you are about to do in the essay. "In this paper, I will.......... The purpose of this essay is
to......." JUST DO IT! Do not.
The Point of the PaperYour paper is acritical evaluati.docx
The Point of the Paper
Your paper is a
critical evaluation of the argument
that someone (you or someone else) gives in support of his or her position on this problem.
It is NOT a discussion of the conclusion, or of the second premise.
Common ProblemsReally a paper “pro-and-con” the conclusionDid not evaluate the argumentOnly discussed premise two, reallyJustified Premise One, then abandoned itDid not try hard enough to understand what the theory is and how it worksJustifications that simply restate the argument in more wordsSAY WHAT YOU ARE WRITING ABOUT!!
For your introduction, describe and explain the problem that gives rise to the argument you are discussing. DO NOT explain the argument, summarize the argument, or repeat the argument.
Explain what the problem is that you are trying to solve
(or that the person whose argument you are discussing is trying to solve). Discuss why this particular subject is a problem, give a little history to set up the problem, etc. This section is usually two or three paragraphs.
Position – one sentence!At the end of your introduction, it is natural to point out that there is a position that you (or someone else) takes on the problem. For example, if you are going to discuss your argument against the teaching of values in our schools, you would assert here that you are against it. On the other hand, if you are going to discuss William Bennett's argument in favor of such teaching, you would point out here that he is in favor of it. The point here is that your paper is about an argument that supports some position on the problem you have outlined in the introduction. State that position here. You should note two important things: the position stated here should be exactly the conclusion of the argument in the next section, and this is not the place to express your opinion. You may, in fact, disagree with the position defended by the argument that your paper is about, and it is fine to point that out here, but do so in one sentence only. For example, you might say: "Bennett's position on this subject is that values should be taught in schools. I am, however, opposed." This part of the paper is normally one or two sentences long.
ARGUMENTImmediately following the position statement you should present the argument that supports the position (either yours or someone else's). It should be presented with numbered premises and a conclusion that is also numbered. There should be a horizontal line separating the premises from the conclusion. For example:(1) If the teaching of values in schools will revive America's flagging morality, then values should be taught in schools.(2) The teaching of values in schools will revive America's flagging morality.(3) Therefore values should be taught in schools.
NOTE: THE CONCLUSION IS THE POSITION!!
Justification I – 1 of Top 3 partsFirst, you should defend the validity of your argument. If your argument is an immediately recognizable form, you may say si.
Standard Form ArgumentsDiscussion TitleThe central tool of.docx
Standard Form Arguments
Discussion Title
The central tool of logic is the argument. Accordingly, constructing good arguments is the central element of this course. Each writing assignment in this course will give you an opportunity to construct and improve upon an argument that you will develop as the course progresses. This discussion post allows you to begin the process of developing your argument by presenting good reasoning on both sides of an issue.
The requirement for this discussion is a minimum of four posts on four separate days, including at least two substantive responses to peers. The total combined word count for all of your posts for this discussion, counted together, should be at least 400 words. Answer all the questions in the prompt, and read any resources that are required to complete the discussion properly. In order to satisfy the posting requirements for the week, complete your initial post by Day 3 (Thursday) and your other posts by Day 7 (Monday). We recommend that you get into the discussion early and spread out your posts over the course of the week. Reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by responding substantively to the replies that others make to you as well. Keep the discussion on target, and analyze things in as much detail as you can.
Prepare: To prepare for this discussion, make sure to read the assigned chapters of the primary text and to review the required resources, including the videos about arguments (in the “Lectures” link on the left). Before responding to the prompt, make sure as well to participate in the interactive scenario at the top of this page titledThe Raise to gain more appreciation of the importance of constructing good arguments in life.
Reflect: Choose a topic from thePHI103 Final Paper Options list. It should be a topic that you find interesting, but also for which you will be able defend a position with careful logical reasoning. Construct the strongest argument that you can on each side of the issue. Strengthen your arguments by contemplating possible objections to each argument, and revise your arguments in light of the objections. Continue this process until you feel that your arguments for each side are as convincing as you can possibly make them.
Write: Present your two arguments (one on each side of the issue) in standard form (with each premise and conclusion on a separate line) on the topic you selected from thePHI103 Final Paper Options list. The two arguments should defend different positions on the topic. For example, if your topic was the existence of Santa Claus, then you would present one argument for the claim that Santa Claus does exist and another argument that Santa Claus does not exist. The premises of each argument will present reasons for thinking that the conclusion is true.
Here is an example of what an argument in standard form looks like:
Premise 1: If Santa Claus exists, then he lives at the North Pole.
Prem.
Dean R Berry Debate: Assisted Pro and Con
The document is an analysis of a persuasive text arguing that laws should protect vulnerable groups from assisted suicide. It discusses evaluating arguments in persuasive texts by identifying claims, evidence, and reasoning. Readers should look for logical fallacies, irrelevant evidence, and whether claims are supported. The document provides examples of different types of evidence like statistics, testimony, examples, and analogies that could support arguments. It also discusses how to annotate a text and take notes to critically analyze persuasive arguments and identify strengths and weaknesses.
9.4 Confronting DisagreementBy employing the principles of accur.docx
9.4 Confronting Disagreement
By employing the principles of accuracy and charity, and by effectively criticizing arguments, there can be constructive disagreement that avoids heated emotions and verbal aggression.
Mastering the skills of identifying and constructing arguments is not easy, but at this stage you should feel fairly confident in your command of such skills. The big test now is how you will react when someone disagrees with your argument or when you disagree with someone else’s argument. Although advancing an argument does not require an interaction, as mentioned in Chapter 2, disagreements are bound to occur. Many of us likely prefer to avoid disagreements. Indeed, many people are terrified of debating a point because they fear offending others or worry that a debate will only bring out the worst in everyone, quickly escalating into an emotional display of verbal aggression and “I’ll show you!” attitudes on both parts. Few truly gain from or enjoy such an exchange. This is why most people avoid addressing touchy subjects during holiday dinners: No one wants a delicious meal to end with unpleasantness. However, few gain from allowing contested issues to go unchallenged, either, whether you are simply stewing in resentment over your uncle’s unenlightened remark about a group of people or whether society fails to question a wrongheaded direction in public policy. Not knowing how to disagree in a calm, productive manner can be quite problematic. We should recognize, however, that some do like the tension of the battle and find the raising of voices and the test of quick retorts very exciting. Even so, all they gain is the confirmation that they can win by being the loudest, most articulate, or most aggressive. Unfortunately, this is an illusion, since quieting the opposition does not amount to having convinced them.
The solution to this common problem is threefold. The first part involves clearly articulating premises, examining the coherence of the argument, and identifying the support for each claim. This part is the most technically difficult but is already within your reach, thanks to the standard argument form. As we have discussed throughout this book, being able to draw an argument buried underneath filler sentences, rhetorical devices, and such allows us to grasp the meaning and coherence of what is being communicated. In this section, we will closely examine another factor in identifying arguments: the correct interpretation of an argument. We will call this the principle of accuracy.
The second part is not technically difficult, because it is an attitude or state of mind. In ordinary idiomatic language, it is referred to as giving a person the benefit of the doubt, letting someone have his or her say, or putting suspicion aside. In other words, we should judge others and their ideas fairly, even if we may be less than inclined to do so. Philosophers call this attitude the principle of charity.
Finally, the third part involv.
Dean R Berry Pro and Con: Torture is Just a Means of Fighting Terrorism d
Dean R Berry Pro and Con: Torture is Just a Means of Fighting Terrorism dRiverside County Office of Education
The document analyzes a persuasive text that argues torture is justified as a means of fighting terrorism. It discusses the author's claim that torture is justified in "ticking time bomb" scenarios where lives could be saved, and also under normal circumstances to prevent future terrorist plots. The author provides supporting arguments based on utilitarian principles that the benefits of saving many lives outweigh the costs to one person being tortured. However, the document notes readers should carefully examine claims and evidence in persuasive texts.Part 1 unit 1 lesson 2 coherence transition between ideas
The document discusses techniques for writing coherent paragraphs and connecting ideas. It begins by defining coherence and explaining that transitional words and phrases establish relationships between sentences by indicating time, spatial, or sequential order. Six categories of transitional elements are described: spatial order, time order, numerical order, cause/effect order, comparison/contrast order, and general/specific order. The document emphasizes that paragraphs need transitional elements to be understandable and coherent, with all sentences arranged in a clear, logical order. It provides examples of transitional words and phrases for different categories.
ElementsofPersuasive.pdf
This document outlines the key elements of a persuasive or argumentative essay. It discusses introducing the topic and thesis, stating facts to support the thesis, and disproving opposing arguments. The essay should build an argument from least to most important points and form conclusions that answer why the paper is being written. When planning such an essay, the writer should choose a position, analyze the audience, research the topic, and structure the essay to consider the purpose, audience and topic. Effective arguments are well-informed, have a debatable claim, disprove opposing claims with evidence, and support the position with facts, statistics, expert quotes, and examples.
Similar to Lincoln Douglas Debate (20)
Writing the Persuasive Essay What is a persuasiveargum.docx
Writing the Persuasive Essay What is a persuasiveargum.docx
Dean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorism
Dean r berry persuasive argument torture is just a means of fighting terrorism
1Paper #1 Topic (Capital Punishment)Argument· If A Then B.docx
1Paper #1 Topic (Capital Punishment)Argument· If A Then B.docx
1Paper #1 Topic (Capital Punishment)Argument· If A Then B.docx
1Paper #1 Topic (Capital Punishment)Argument· If A Then B.docx
Writing a Persuasive Paragraph or Essay Choose a deba.docx
Writing a Persuasive Paragraph or Essay Choose a deba.docx
The Point of the PaperYour paper is acritical evaluati.docx
The Point of the PaperYour paper is acritical evaluati.docx
Standard Form ArgumentsDiscussion TitleThe central tool of.docx
Standard Form ArgumentsDiscussion TitleThe central tool of.docx
9.4 Confronting DisagreementBy employing the principles of accur.docx
9.4 Confronting DisagreementBy employing the principles of accur.docx
Dean R Berry Pro and Con: Torture is Just a Means of Fighting Terrorism d
Dean R Berry Pro and Con: Torture is Just a Means of Fighting Terrorism d
Part 1 unit 1 lesson 2 coherence transition between ideas
Part 1 unit 1 lesson 2 coherence transition between ideas
Recently uploaded
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/tacvl9ekroe9hqupdnjruiypvm9rdaneEducational Technology in the Health Sciences
Plenary presentation at the NTTC Inter-university Workshop, 18 June 2024, Manila Prince Hotel.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
skeleton System.pdf (skeleton system wow)
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
إضغ بين إيديكم من أقوى الملازم التي صممتها
ملزمة تشريح الجهاز الهيكلي (نظري 3)
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
تتميز هذهِ الملزمة بعِدة مُميزات :
1- مُترجمة ترجمة تُناسب جميع المستويات
2- تحتوي على 78 رسم توضيحي لكل كلمة موجودة بالملزمة (لكل كلمة !!!!)
#فهم_ماكو_درخ
3- دقة الكتابة والصور عالية جداً جداً جداً
4- هُنالك بعض المعلومات تم توضيحها بشكل تفصيلي جداً (تُعتبر لدى الطالب أو الطالبة بإنها معلومات مُبهمة ومع ذلك تم توضيح هذهِ المعلومات المُبهمة بشكل تفصيلي جداً
5- الملزمة تشرح نفسها ب نفسها بس تكلك تعال اقراني
6- تحتوي الملزمة في اول سلايد على خارطة تتضمن جميع تفرُعات معلومات الجهاز الهيكلي المذكورة في هذهِ الملزمة
واخيراً هذهِ الملزمة حلالٌ عليكم وإتمنى منكم إن تدعولي بالخير والصحة والعافية فقط
كل التوفيق زملائي وزميلاتي ، زميلكم محمد الذهبي 💊💊
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"National Information Standards Organization (NISO)
This presentation was provided by Racquel Jemison, Ph.D., Christina MacLaughlin, Ph.D., and Paulomi Majumder. Ph.D., all of the American Chemical Society, for the second session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session Two: 'Expanding Pathways to Publishing Careers,' was held June 13, 2024.Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
Whether you're new to SEO or looking to refine your existing strategies, this webinar will provide you with actionable insights and practical tips to elevate your nonprofit's online presence.
How Barcodes Can Be Leveraged Within Odoo 17
In this presentation, we will explore how barcodes can be leveraged within Odoo 17 to streamline our manufacturing processes. We will cover the configuration steps, how to utilize barcodes in different manufacturing scenarios, and the overall benefits of implementing this technology.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation results
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Event Link:- https://meetups.mulesoft.com/events/details/mulesoft-mysore-presents-mule-event-processing-models/
Agenda
● What is event processing in MuleSoft?
● Types of event processing models in Mule 4
● Distinction between the reactive, parallel, blocking & non-blocking processing
For Upcoming Meetups Join Mysore Meetup Group - https://meetups.mulesoft.com/mysore/YouTube:- youtube.com/@mulesoftmysore
Mysore WhatsApp group:- https://chat.whatsapp.com/EhqtHtCC75vCAX7gaO842N
Speaker:-
Shivani Yasaswi - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shivaniyasaswi/
Organizers:-
Shubham Chaurasia - https://www.linkedin.com/in/shubhamchaurasia1/
Giridhar Meka - https://www.linkedin.com/in/giridharmeka
Priya Shaw - https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-shaw
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
Recently uploaded (20)
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit Innovation
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Jemison, MacLaughlin, and Majumder "Broadening Pathways for Editors and Authors"
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
Elevate Your Nonprofit's Online Presence_ A Guide to Effective SEO Strategies...
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Mule event processing models | MuleSoft Mysore Meetup #47
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptx
Lincoln Douglas Debate
- 1. LD Debate Part II