Machine Learning Classification to predict water purity based on Viruses and Bacteria levels Water is a major resource in every day’s life for humans, animals and plants. The quality of water polluting due to the industrialization, mining, and some other factors. Drinking water and irrigation water are two different types, and the quality levels to be measured based on the usage. The world health organization released some threshold values based on some water parameters. The metrics are named as The Water Purity by Assessing and Eliminating Viruses and Bacteria (WPAEVB) and Irrigation WQI (IWQI) which can measure the water quality. This paper proposed a network architecture to analyze all the parameters by using machine learning tools (ML) tools which will determine the drinking water an irrigation water based on virus and bacteria values. The model is developed based on LoRa and land topology. Here we used three models SVM, logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) to know whether irrigation water is being used for drinking water by detecting the percentage and levels of bacteria and virus. The dataset was developed based on the ML models due to the lower availability of datasets related to irrigation and drinking water and bacteria and virus percentage is also calculated by using three models. After applying all the models, LR given the best performance for drinking water and SVM given the best results for irrigation water. The recursive feature elimination was done by applying all three mL models.

1. Machine Learning Classification to predict water purity based on Viruses and Bacteria levels
Abstract
Water is a major resource in every day’s life for humans, animals and plants. The quality of water polluting due to the industrialization,
mining, and some other factors. Drinking water and irrigation water are two different types, and the quality levels to be measured based
on the usage. The world health organization released some threshold values based on some water parameters. The metrics are named as
The Water Purity by Assessing and Eliminating Viruses and Bacteria (WPAEVB) and Irrigation WQI (IWQI) which can measure the
water quality. This paper proposed a network architecture to analyze all the parameters by using machine learning tools (ML) tools
which will determine the drinking water an irrigation water based on virus and bacteria values. The model is developed based on LoRa
and land topology. Here we used three models SVM, logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) to know whether irrigation water
is being used for drinking water by detecting the percentage and levels of bacteria and virus. The dataset was developed based on the
ML models due to the lower availability of datasets related to irrigation and drinking water and bacteria and virus percentage is also
calculated by using three models. After applying all the models, LR given the best performance for drinking water and SVM given the
best results for irrigation water. The recursive feature elimination was done by applying all three mL models.
Keywords:-
1. INTRODUCTION
The constituent components of this architecture are described
as follows. The detecting layer cooperates straightforwardly
with the water tests in a stream, flow, dam, etc. To quantify
water boundaries. It is developed squarely into an upward post
labeled ''sensor test'' and comprises of several sensors packaged
all in all. These sensors might include pH, conductivity,
turbidity, temperature, leftover chlorine and numerous others.
very much like the ones given via Libelium [16]. All telemetry
insights estimated by those sensors are shipped off the Haze
Hubs (FNs), worried or remotely, through the sending unit. In
possibilities were introducing sensors in water supply(s) is
uncommonly troublesome or while the ideal sensors aren't
without issues accessible, water boundary readings might be
amassed from the connected water cure vegetation.
2) Edge Layer: This layer obliges low-end handling
contraptions alluded to as angle modules, which could envelop
single-board PC frameworks like Raspberry Pi or Nvidia
Jetson, as well as microcontrollers prefer Arduino or ESP32.
These gadgets serve two number one capacities: I) as records
pre-handling gadgets, liable for collecting, conglomerating,
separating, and arranging information from the detecting layer,
and ii) as local area entryways to send telemetry records to the
FNs through 3G/4G/5G versatile organizations or different low-
fueled extensive territory local area answers.
3) Fade Nodes (FNs): These are minimal dispersed distributed
computing hubs intended to supply carry processing energy and
carport nearer to the insights. This arrangement diminishes
inertness due to transmission deferrals to/from the far away
Cloud [17]. FN is chargeable for ordering water tests the
utilization of framework acquiring information on models,
which incorporates the ones proposed in this notice. Because of
restricted figuring skills in contrast with the Cloud, just the
greatest compelling boundaries are thought about all through
water design type. This strategy decreases the need for some
sensors (taking into account that now not all boundaries are
estimated), consequently requiring fewer figuring resources for
the class cycle. Also, FN can adapt to help control, planning,
and different obligations. In cases in which extensive term
stockpiling or potentially complex calculations surpass the
Haze's capacity, realities are sent to the Cloud records focus.
Cloud Server farm: The Cloud addresses a distant, unreasonable
exhibition processing foundation that proposals on-request
figuring administrations [18]. In our framework, the Cloud
capabilities as each a measurements vault and a stage for
executing progressed information examination, making
dashboards, and site facilitating relevant administrations and
programming program.
4) Application Layer:
Goes about as an extension among clients (which incorporate
water control government, end clients/clients, and various
partners) and programming program/contributions working
inside the Cloud. Fundamental programming for following
water boundaries is facilitated here and accessible to clients
through cell and web stages.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
In this part, we evaluation a couple of present figures out
recorded as a hard copy on related problem subjects. This piece
is separated into three key classes: in any case, the heaps of
distant associations in following water limits. Second, gauges
for assessment drinkable water, and finally, focuses on works
that accentuation on reviewing sensibility of water for water
framework abilities.
Twelve water worldwide situating frameworks have been game
plan to degree a couple physio-compound water limits, which
consolidates pH, separated solids, Zinc, Lead and various
others. Finally, came by results have been penniless down the
usage of most critical part evaluation. Similarly, [13] fostered a
contraption to isolate water first rate Limpopo Stream Bowl in
Mozambique and foundation 23 worldwide situating
frameworks to measure physio-manufactured and
microbiological limits, and long term take a gander at the
uncommon of water inside the stream bowl. To adjust to the
challenges of top-notch game plan of measures and looking at
frequencies, which are as a rule faced while making water
worldwide situating systems, the makers in [14] advanced a
monetarily viable variation that mixed genetic estimation in
with 1-D water tasteful generation. Anyway, the show-stoppers
changed into most clear reproduced through the use of genetic
plan of rules, the makers had the choice to get up the NP
extraordinary trouble free from in a perfect world putting
worldwide situating frameworks. Checking water limits
regularly incorporates irregularly examining a packaging of
water to clutch relevant estimations.
These estimations could include physico-engineered and
microbiological assessments, which integrate capacity of
hydrogen (pH), temperature, sodium levels, and so forth. In a
water following association, assessed limits should be moved
to a base station wherein huge selection(s) would be taken. On

2. account of the small thought of sent real factors, delicate weight
dispatch shows prepared to conveying infinitesimal estimations
over broad distance are normal for water actually looking at
networks. From composing, Low Power Wide Locale
Association (LPWAN) advancement were inclined toward for
such ventures. An expansive talk on LPWAN headways become
acted in [19]. The syntheses in assessment some sub-GHz
answers containing Sig-Fox, LoRa, Ingenu and Telensa,
concerning their variety, transmission rate, and station matter.
Ingenu became proposed to have the longest arrive at in city
settings at 15 km, went with the aid of SigFox at 10 km (in
metropolitan networks) and 50 km (in country areas); then,
LoRa at five km (in metropolitan networks), and 15 km in
commonplace settings. Concerning evaluation of report
developments, there was a long-drawn chitchat over the
efficacy of programming program generations versus
certifiable overall testing. Anyway, this conversation regardless
fumes, different investigators have shown that entertainment
influences are occasionally at standard with veritable overall
checks. For example, using LoRa, the makers in [20]
differentiated amusement influences and real test for
intervehicle correspondence. They included NS3 as a
generation stage and an Arduino UNO C Dragino LoRa module
for the real overall assessments, while Spread hardship,
insurance Pack Between get-together (PIR), Bundle Transport
Extent (PDR) and Got Signal Strength Pointer (RSSI) degree
have been used as benchmark estimations. They contemplated
that the effects of the test framework were predictable with the
ones of the veritable overall examinations. In a similar work,
Hassan [21] moreover took a gander at the efficacy of
reenactment results (from Radio Flexible test framework) with
veritable worldwide tests (the usage of small controllers C
LoRa modules) when the utilization of LoRa as a platform for
Wi-Fi. Not by any stretch like [20], [21] didn't convey a side-
by side distinction of reproduced versus Genuine results for
every estimation contemplated anyway contemplated that the
test framework executed well. [ 22] foundation seven
arrangements of XBee modules and in assessment conversation
as a rule using each the 800/900MHz and 2.4GHz frequencies.
They contemplated that reenactment results from the Radio
Versatile test framework upheld with those of genuine
assessments.
2) ASSESSING WATER POTABILITY
While looking over the astounding of drinking water, the Water
Quality Document (WQI) has been the genuine estimation. A
unitless numeric cost estimates the sensibility of water for
human use or wide use. As said previously, different styles exist
for working out WQI depending at the area and regular
conditions in such regions. In an ongoing gander at with the
aide of Uddin et al. [ 23], it changed into referred to that around
35 WQI models are being utilized around the world;
simultaneously, of their viewpoint, the superior ones are the
Horton Rundown, Public Sanitization Foundation WQI, the
Canadian Office of Priests of the Environment (CCME) WQI,
Scottish Investigation improvement Division (SRDD)
document, Bascaron record (BWQI), Fleecy Association point
contraption (FIS), and the Malaysian water exceptional record
(MWQI). The explore saw those models in articulations of
hidden piece, limits considered, requesting and weighting rules,
programming locales and natural cutoff points. For breaking
point of those shape, a WQI charge of as a base 50 became
pondered good. In an associated materials [6] besides
investigated a couple of WQI plans at any rate with complement
on limit importance. The work chose the most conventional
limits used recorded as a hard copy and did coherent moderate
way (AHP) and assessing class with the aide of a totally
fundamentally based evaluation procedure (MACBETH) to
consign burdens to water limits and pick the best significant
ones. In [10] the makers hoped to survey the effect of mining
sports on water enchanting in certain regions of Bangladesh.
Twelve limits were contemplated, including pH, electrical
conductivity (EC), turbidity, hardness, pungency and various
others. These have been then benchmarked as opposed to the
WHO standards to choose WQI. In a few other imaginative
manifestations, [11] did WQI to metropolitan water help the
chiefs. The work returns again to an early look at in [12], in
which a water following association changed into set in a
situation to give real factors about water, by, for instance,
information generally the exceptional of water across the
twelve following factors the use of WQI. Two models were used
to work out the WQI, particularly CCME WQI and Cetesb
WQI. CCME classified all models as poor, at the same time as
Cetesb achieved a mix of Good, Fair and Poor. A most critical
shortcoming of WQI is its site specificity, which proposes that
WQI not set in stone for a specific stream or region, using the
limits in that. It in this manner cannot be routinely executed to
an exceptional water body other than while the 2 degrees near
credits and limit degrees. Furthermore, WQI are progressed to
objective specific use case(s), accordingly, restricted by the
constraints set for that use case(s). In a bid to address this and
make WQI water test cynic, [24] proposed a characteristic WQI
model that is relevant to all water bodies in South Africa. The
makers completed thirteen limits chose from composing and
prepared experts. To get a characteristic WQI, the makers made
a custom assortment brand name, which treats the WQI inputs
from uncommon water sources as a plan of straight
circumstances. Their unified model was good for bunch water
tests from the unique sources capably.
3. PROPOSED METHOD
In the proposed method, the water quality is assessed based on
the level of bacteria and virus and then declared weather it can
be used for drinking purpose or not. In this methodology,
advanced technologies in microbial analysis are used to know
the microbial contaminants. This includes the application of
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation
sequencing (NGS) to identify and quantify specific bacteria and
viruses present in water sources.

3. Figure.1 Proposed Model
Logistic Regression Classifier
Logistic regression will be taken into consideration, when the
variable has two classes either 1 or 0 or else yes or no. if there
are 3 or more distinct classes then it is called as multinomial
logistic regression. It depends on the dataset weather it is LR or
MLR, but the process and evaluation criteria will be same for
both the types.
Random Forest
Random forest is used for classification, regression and for so
many, so it is also called random decision forest. In the
classification training phase n number of decision trees were
created and gives the best output based on most of the trees. It
gives the overall prediction of the individual trees in the
regression task. The output and result will be considered based
on the data being analyzed. Third model is used as black box in
n number of business applications because it gives matched
predictions and with minimal requirements of configuration.
SVM
From a training set, finding out the unbiased and discriminant
function by using SVM. The classification function directly
assigns a information factor X in the mission but which is less
powerful than generative methods. In the multidimensional
spaces, finding the probabilities are very critical. Classifier
learning includes n number steps mainly figuring out the
matching equation.
Fig.2: Proposed method Diagram
Fig.3: Dataset preparation
In the proposed method, the quality of the water decided based
on the virus and bacteria level. Based on the output values of
these two parameters, the results will be given as drinking water
or irrigation water.
4. IMPLEMENTATION
Modules
Here, the service provider should do a login with exact
username and password. If the login was successful, the person
can perform some operations like, browse water data sets, train
& test, can view tested and trained datasets on bar chart, can
view tested and trained results, can see water quality detection
type which is predicted, ratio, can download the dataset,
detection ratio results, and can view remote users.
View and Authorize Users
Here the Admin can see the users list who are registered. The
details admin can see are username, email, address.
Remote User
In general, there are n number of users. Every user has to be
register before performing any operation. After the successful
registration, all the registered databases will be saved in the
database. Then the user can login by using username and
password. After the successful REGISTER AND LOGIN, Then
Water Quality Prediction and Detection Type Will Be Seen, And
Also Profile Can Be Viewed
Fig.4: Total input and output of application is given Data flow
diagram
Fig.5: Flowchart: Register User Flow of the user verification
before login and logout

4. Fig.6: Flowchart: Service Provider Flow of the user
verification before login and logout
A simple flow chart follows minimum four steps to get the
results.
The first step is start, and then login. If the login status is yes,
then enter register or login the with the credentials. If the login
status is no, then it meant username or password is incorrect.
If the login details are matched, then type water quality will be
detected and it can be known in the profile. Then logout for the
security reason.
Fig.7: Sequence Diagram is show the Sequence of operations
done in the application
5. RESULTS
Fig.8: Dataset of the project
It contains the 3276 instances with 12 features
Features are hardness, Ph, solids, chloramine, sulphate,
conductivity, bacteria, virus, potability, turbidity, trihalome and
other.
Fig.7: Random Forest Performance Evaluation
From figure.7, the RF is providing the performance evaluation
s like accuracy is 71.21 percent, precision is 71.53 percent, rec
all is 66.79 and f1-score is 66.79 percent.
Fig.8: SVM Performance Evaluation
From figure.8, the SVM is providing the performance evaluati
ons like accuracy is 60.29 percent, precision is 60.44 percent, r
ecall is 99.59 and f1-score is 99.59 percent.

5. Fig.9: LR Performance Evaluation
From figure.9, the LR is providing the performance evaluation
s like acuracy is 60.54 percent, precision is 60.54 percent, reca
ll is 100.00 and f1-score is 100.00 percent.
6. CONCLUSION
In this paper there are two major steps, one is dataset of water
monitoring network and another one is assessing the water
quality. The water quality decided based on the virus and
bacteria level. The water monitoring network is based on Lo Ra
which is low power long-range protocol for data transmission.
Mesh network topology is used to the entire city and data
gathered for monitoring and saved in the cloud server. Then ML
models are applied to know whether it is irrigation water or
drinking water. For the training and testing we used RF, LR and
SVM. After observing the results, LR worked better for
drinking water and SVM was good for irrigation water.
Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) was used for
classification accuracies of the ML models and results showed
PH, and hardness were the low powerful factors in drinking
water and SSP was low for irrigation water.
In this paper deep learning techniques are not used. For the
manual calculated indices, unsupervised ML techniques can be
considered in the future work. To identity the influential
parameters multi criteria decision making can be considered
instead of RFE. Usage prediction models, tracking sources
contaminates and monitoring the water network can also be
included in the future network.
REFERENCES
[1] B. X. Lee, F. Kjaerulf, S. Turner, L. Cohen, P. D. Donnelly,
R. Muggah, R. Davis, A. Realini, B. Kieselbach, L. S.
MacGregor, I.Waller, R. Gordon, M. Moloney-Kitts, G. Lee,
and J. Gilligan, ``Transforming our world: Implementing the
2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators,''
J. Public Health Policy, vol. 37, no. S1, pp. 13_31, Sep. 2016.
[2] Integrated Approaches for Sustainable Development Goals
Planning: The Case of Goal 6 on Water and Sanitation, U.
ESCAP, Bangkok, Thailand,2017.
[3] WHO. Water. Protection of the Human Environment.
Accessed: Jan. 24, 2022. [Online]. Available:
www.afro.who.int/health-topics/water
[4] L. Ho, A. Alonso, M. A. E. Forio, M. Vanclooster, and P. L.
M. Goethals, ``Water research in support of the sustainable
development goal 6: Acase study in Belgium,'' J. Cleaner Prod.,
vol. 277, Dec. 2020, Art. no. 124082.
[5] Global Nutrition Report 2016: From Promise to Impact:
Ending Malnutrition by 2030, International Food Policy
Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 2016, doi:
10.2499/9780896295841.
[6] N. Akhtar, M. I. S. Ishak, M. I. Ahmad, K. Umar, M. S. Md
Yusuff, M. T. Anees, A. Qadir, and Y. K. A. Almanasir,
``Modi_cation of the water quality index (WQI) process for
simple calculation using the multicriteria decision-making
(MCDM) method: A review,'' Water, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 905, Mar.
2021.
[7] World Health Organization. (1993). Guidelines for
Drinking-Water Quality. World Health Organization. Accessed:
Jan. 12, 2022. [Online]. Available:
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/
10665/44584/9789241548151-eng.pdf
[8] Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, Federation WE, APH Association, American
Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DC, USA,
2005.
[9] L. S. Clesceri, A. E. Greenberg, and A. D. Eaton, ``Standard
methods for the examination of water and wastewater,'' Amer.
Public Health Assoc. (APHA), Washington, DC, USA. Tech.
Rep.21, 2005.
[10] M. F. Howladar, M. A. Al Numanbakth, and M. O.
Faruque, ``An application of water quality index (WQI) and
multivariate statistics to evaluate the water quality around
Maddhapara granite mining industrial area, Dinajpur,
Bangladesh,'' Environ. Syst. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1_8, Jan.
2018
[11] A. R. Finotti, R. Finkler, N. Susin, and V. E. Schneider,
``Use of water quality index as a tool for urban water resources
management,'' Int. J. Sustain. Develop. Planning, vol. 10, no. 6,
pp. 781_794, Dec. 2015.
[12] A. R. Finotti, N. Susin, R. Finkler, M. D. Silva, and V. E.
Schneider, ``Development of a monitoring network of water
resources in urban areas as a support for municipal
environmental management,'' WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ., vol.
182, pp. 133_143, May 2014.
[13] M. Chilundo, P. Kelderman, and J. H. O'keeffe, ``Design
of a water quality monitoring network for the limpopo river
basin in Mozambique,'' Phys. Chem. Earth, A/B/C, vol. 33, nos.
8_13, pp. 655_665, Jan. 2008.
[14] M. Karamouz, M. Karimi, and R. Kerachian, ``Design of
water quality monitoring network for river systems,'' in Critical
Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources
Management. London, U.K.: IWA, 2004, pp. 1_9.
[15] J. Foschi, A. Turolla, and M. Antonelli, ``Soft sensor
predictor of E. Coli concentration based on conventional
monitoring parameters forwastewater disinfection control,''
Water Res., vol. 191, Mar. 2021, Art. no. 116806.
[16] Libelium.com. IoT Solution for Water Management.
Accessed: Jan. 27, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://www.libelium.com/ iot-solutions/smart-water/
[17] K. Ma, A. Bagula, C. Nyirenda, and O. Ajayi, ``An IoT-
based fog computing model,'' Sensors, vol. 19, no. 12, p. 2783,
Jun. 2019.
[18] I. Odun-Ayo, O. Ajayi, and A. Falade, ``Cloud computing
and quality of service: Issues and developments,'' in Proc. Int.
Multi-Conf. Eng. Compute Scientists (IMECS 2018), Hong
kong, Mar. 2018, pp. 14_16.

6. [19] U. Raza, P. Kulkarni, and M. Sooriyabandara, ``Low power
wide area networks: An overview,'' IEEE Commun. Surveys
Tuts., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 855_873, 2nd Quart., 2017.
[20] F. M. Ortiz, T. T. de Almeida, A. E. Ferreira, and L. H. M.
K. Costa, ``Experimental vs. simulation analysis of LoRa for
vehicular communications,'' Comput. Commun., vol. 160, pp.
299_310, Jul. 2020.
[21] H. A. Aden and K. R. Karlsson, ``Evaluating LoRa
physical as a radio link technology for use in a remote-
controlled electric switch system for a network bridge radio-
node,'' M.S. thesis, Dept. Elect. Eng., School Elect. Eng.
Comput. Sci., KTH Royal Inst. Technol., Stockholm, Sweden,
2018.
[22] M. Zennaro, A. Bagula, D. Gascon, and A. B. Noveleta,
``Long distance wireless sensor networks: Simulation vs
reality,'' in Proc. 4th ACM Workshop Netw. Syst. Developing
Regions (NSDR), 2010, pp. 1_2.
[23] M. G. Uddin, S. Nash, and A. I. Olbert, ``Areview of water
quality index models and their use for assessing surface water
quality,'' Ecolog. Indicators, vol. 122, Mar. 2021, Art. no.
107218.
[24] T. Banda and M. Kumarasamy, ``Development of a
universal water quality index (UWQI) for South African river
catchments,'' Water, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 1534, May 2020.