The document discusses line balancing of a rear cushion production line. It identifies bottlenecks in the current process with cycle times over the takt time of 10.1 seconds. By adding additional labor to two bottleneck stations, manual sub-assembly processes, the cycle times are reduced. This increases the minimum and maximum output capacities of the line to meet and exceed current and future demand. Line balancing the process eliminates idle time and improves productivity.
CarbonForce is an innovative grinding wheel core for vitrified cBN wheels. Made up of innovative carbon fibre reinforced polymers, the new wheels are up to 75% lighter in weight than standard diamond grinding wheels, enabling easy operator handling.
CarbonForce is an innovative grinding wheel core for vitrified cBN wheels. Made up of innovative carbon fibre reinforced polymers, the new wheels are up to 75% lighter in weight than standard diamond grinding wheels, enabling easy operator handling.
Development of fixture_to_reduce_the_cycle_time_of_c_8_griding_machineLaukik Raut
“What a difference a second makes” – a quote from an empowered employee. Just one second over a ten
second continuous cycle can mean your line runs consistently 10% faster, the difference between comfortably
achieving tight production schedules or continually being capacity constrained.[1] This work presents a new
approach for the reduction of process cycle time and its impact on a company's competitive edge. Reduction in
cycle time has been gaining significant attention in recent times. The shorter cycle times effect in higher
consumer satisfaction, lower manufacturing rate, higher yield, and better potential given tool inventory and
facility constraints. This research paper provides a brief review of core approaches related to cycle time and
also describes a methodology for cycle time reduction in any manufacturing and automobile production
industry. It includes the assessment and potential gains of the projected cycle time reduction methodology
Development of fixture_to_reduce_the_cycle_time_of_c_8_griding_machineLaukik Raut
“What a difference a second makes” – a quote from an empowered employee. Just one second over a ten
second continuous cycle can mean your line runs consistently 10% faster, the difference between comfortably
achieving tight production schedules or continually being capacity constrained.[1] This work presents a new
approach for the reduction of process cycle time and its impact on a company's competitive edge. Reduction in
cycle time has been gaining significant attention in recent times. The shorter cycle times effect in higher
consumer satisfaction, lower manufacturing rate, higher yield, and better potential given tool inventory and
facility constraints. This research paper provides a brief review of core approaches related to cycle time and
also describes a methodology for cycle time reduction in any manufacturing and automobile production
industry. It includes the assessment and potential gains of the projected cycle time reduction methodology
Sheet1ASU - CON 243NameRoss DodenhoffHomework Chapter 2Student IDP.docxbagotjesusa
Sheet1ASU - CON 243NameRoss DodenhoffHomework Chapter 2Student IDProblem StatementYour company has just been awarded a large contract that would be well suited for Caterpillar 740B Articulated Haul Trucks. A local rental yard said that they will rent you the trucks for $13,200 per month plus 7.0% sales tax not including any operating costs. What would it cost to purchase the trucks instead of renting them? The purchase price including sales tax and attachments is $575,000. The project will last 5 years and you are not sure that you will have work for the trucks after this project therefore you need to plan on selling them at the end of 5 years for 40% of the original purchase price. According to the schedules that the project managers have put together it appears that you will be able to get 1,800 hours of utilization per year on the trucks during all five years and they also anticipate 50 minute efficiency working hours. According to the Chief Financial Officer of the company your cost of money is 6% and the annual insurance amount on each truck will be 0.5%. Your tire sales person says that a set of 6 tires will cost $25,000, last 3,800 hours and the average repairs will be about 15% of the purchase price over the life of the tires. The preventative maintenance schedule that your fleet is on has PM1 oil changes completed every 250 hours with oil, lube and filter cost at $15.00 per gallon, repair and maintenance cost is $5.00 per hour and your throttle load factor for articulated trucks is 60%. Because they are trucks and will not be scraping the ground they do not have any high wear ground engaging items to wear out. Use the product specifications included with this assignment to determine the Gross Flywheel Horse Power, engine crankcase capacities and any other information that you may need. Diesel fuel is $2.50 per gallon for red dyed.Question 1(16 POINTS)What is the Average Annual Investment for this machine?Question 2(24 POINTS)What is the ownership cost per hour?Puchase Price-salvage value-cost of tires+cost of capital+overhead=Ownership expensePurchase Price= 575,000Salvage Value= 230,000Cost of Tires= 25,000Question 3(36 POINTS)What is the operating cost per hour?Question 4(8 POINTS)What is the total cost per hour to your company if you were to own this machine? Question 5(8 POINTS)What is the total cost per hour to your company if you were to rent this machine? Question 6(8 POINTS)For only this project, would it be more economical to rent or buy this machine? Explain why.Question 7(BONUS POINTS)In considering owning vs renting, what is the breakeven point in hours (i.e. how many hours would you need to utilize the equipment before it becomes more economical to own the machine)?
740B
Articulated
Truck
Engine
Weights
Engine
Model
Tier
4
Interim/EU
Stage
IIIB
Cat®
C15
ACERT™
Rated
Payload
39.5
tonnes
43.5
tons
Gross
Power
–
SAE
J1995
365
kW
489
hp
Body
Capacities
Net
Power
–
ISO
14396
361
kW
484
hp
Heaped
SAE
2:.
FMS Layout for Manufacturing of Marine GearsSomesh Saurabh
This is a complete presentation on Manufacturing and FMS layout for Marine Gears which are Helical, Spiral Bevel and Conical Bevel. It includes manufacturing, heat treatment process, FMS and testing also.
1. SUBMITTED BY:
WAJAHAT ALI (BS IE, 4TH YEAR)
SHAH FAISAL (BS IE 3RD YEAR
ZAHOORULLAH (BS IE 3RD YEAR)
MOHAMMAD IMRAN (BS ME 3RD YEAR)
ADEEL KHALID (BS EE 3RD YEAR)
ASIF NAWAZ( BS ME 2ND YEAR)
LINE BALANCING OF REAR CUSHION
LINE
2. LINE BALANCING
Line balancing is the process of assigning tasks to
workstations, so that workstations have
approximately equal time requirements. We use line
balancing to
- minimize idle time
- balance bottlenecks
3. BOTTLENECK
Neck of the Bottle never has the same capacity as the base.
In product layouts, when we want to improve productivity, we
need to find and improve
critical operations, known as bottlenecks. Productivity
improvements to any non-bottleneck operation will NOT
improve productivity of the system.
4. THE CUSHION SHOP
The cushion shop has two lines operating:
Front Fork
Rear Cushion
5. CUSHION SHOP
Total demand per shift= 2850
Total time Available= 575 min –
Lunch Break= 30 min
Prayer Break= 20 min
Tea break= 20 min
5% tolerance time= 25.25
Total time for production=28785 sec= 480 min=8 hrs.
6. TAKT TIME
Takt time= Production time available/Total demand per shift
Takt time= 28785 sec/ 2850= 10.1 sec
Thus one unit of product should spent a maximum of 10.1
sec in the line for producing 28750 units of production
Total workstation are 11 and total man hours are 88.
9. TABLE FOR CPM DIAGRAM
Activity Alphabet Time
Manual Sub Assy A 4.1
Manual sub Assy B 3.6
Manual sub assy+riveting C 8.5
Oil filling +rod guide press D 10.18
Stacking E 7.9
Manual sub assy+Caulking F 10.5
Manual sub assy G 6.018
Manual sub assy H 3.11
Manual sub assy I 2.35
Metal tightening (2 machines) J 8.1
Inspection k 6.032
12. THE BOTTLE NECK
From the above data, it has been found that two processes in
the line have appeared as Bottlenecks.
The Combined process of oil filling and rod guide press are
having the cycle times 10.18sec and 10.5 sec respectively.
Thus the minimum cycle time of the line comes out to be 10.5
sec which is more than the takt time i.e. 10.1 sec.
13. OUTPUT CAPACITY
Thus, maximum output capacity of line= Operating time /Min
cycle time
=28785/10.5= 2741 units
The lead time or flow time of the line is 78.49 sec, which is
also the maximum cycle time.
Minimum output capacity of line=
Operating time/ Max cycle time
= 28785/78.49= 367 units
14. OUTPUT CAPACITY
Thus the output capacity of current line can range from 367
units to 2741 units.
But the requirement of line is 2850 units and even the max
output capacity of line is not matching the demand and thus
the workers of rear cushion are compelled to work in their
lunch break and line’s speed is also increased at times.
Thus the rear cushion line needs to be balanced.
15. ISSUES IN THE LINE
At the combined process of oil filing+ rod guide process, the
processing time is 10.18 sec. The product has to wait 2.4 sec
on avg at the machine during the process.
At the combined process of Caulking+ Manual sub assy, the
processing time is 10.5 and the product has to wait 3.01 sec
on avg at the machine during the process.
16. LINE BALANCING
The bottleneck’s time should be reduced by increasing either
machines or manpower.
As both the bottlenecks include manual sub-assy, thus one
more person should be added to these process.
It will increase the workstations from 11 to 13.
The processing time of both bottlenecks would be reduced
by, one half.
17. TABLE FOR NEW CPM
DIAGRAM
Activity Alphabet Time
Manual sub assy A 4.1
Manual sub assy B 3.6
Manual Sub assy+ Riveting C 8.5
Oil Filling+ Rod guide press D 5.09
Stacking E 7.9
Manual sub assy+ caulking F 5.25
Manual sub assy G 6.018
Manual sub assy H 3.1
Manual sub assy I 2.35
Metal Tightening( 2 Machines) J 16.2
Inspection k 6.032
20. PROCESS
IMPROVEMENT
Thus, the part waiting at the two bottlenecks processes is
nullified now.
The oil filling and rod guide process and caulking+ manual
sub assy have the processing times 5.09 and 5.25
respectively.
Now the min cycle time of the line is 8.5 sec which is the time
of riveting+ manual sub assy, which is less than the takt time
and thus the line is more balanced.
21. CAPACITY
CALCULATION
Now the maximum output capacity = Operating time/ min
cycle time= 28785/8.5=3386 units
The lead time or flow time of the line is 68.15sec, which is
also the maximum cycle time.
Minimum output capacity of line=
Operating time/ Max cycle time
= 28785/68.15= 422 units
22. ADVANTAGE
Thus by balancing the line in this way, the line has the
capacity to produce the parts in the range of 422 units to
3386 units and thus it has crossed the 2850 parts, daily
requirement.
23. FUTURE USEFULNESS
As currently the main frame line at the main plant is
producing 1130 bikes everyday and the requirement from
cushion shop is 2850.
But with the installation of new line at the mainframe
assembly, the requirement from cushion shop will rise.
25. CONCLUSION
But if, the line will be balanced in the suggested way, then the
maximum output capacity will be 3386 cushions and thus the
cushion shop will not have to worry a lot on increase in
demand from the mainframe assembly.