TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
Library Tour new PhD sudents VUB
1. From good sources
Introduction to academic
research methodology in the
library
Steven Laporte
October 5th, 2015
University Library VUB
Steven.laporte@vub.ac.be
3. Overview
2. Internal and external library resources.
Academic databases
Paywalls and Open Access
Relevant external sources
o Images
o Videos
o Sound
7. When does a source qualify as a scientific?
How to recognize a reliable source:
1. The carrier
o Unknown website/suspect url
o Blog
o Newspaper article
o Peer-reviewed journal
8. When does a source qualify as a scientific?
How to recognize a reliable source:
2. The author:
o Where does the author work?
o What is the educational background of the author?
o Other publications
o Is the author often cited?
9. V.b. Avi Sion
Sent to the library unsolicited
Author name looks like an alias
Linked to an ‘odd’ website:
http://www.thelogician.net/
Claims a PhD, but from which
university?
NO bibliography
10. When does a source qualify as a scientific?
How to recognize a reliable source:
3. The publisher:
o Other publications?
o Connected to a scientific institution?
o Finish
11. V.b. Lap Lambert academic Publishing
Unsolicited
Website: https://www.lap-
publishing.com/
No academic partners
Negative reviews:
http://scholarlyoa.com/2012/11/0
5/lambert-academic-publishing-a-
must-to-avoid/
No peer-review
12. When does a source qualify as a scientific?
How to recognize a reliable source:
4. Publication date?
o Dependant on the subject
o Recent?
13. When does a source qualify as a scientific?
How to recognize a reliable source:
5. Reviews?
o Judgement
o Source of the review
14. When does a source qualify as a scientific?
How to recognize a reliable source:
6. Citations and bibliography
o Position within a research network
o Traceability of the facts cited
o Identification of the author's own contribution
o Repeatability of the investigation
15. When does a source qualify as a scientific?
How to recognize a reliable source:
7. Financing
o Independence of the investigation
16.
17. Peer-review?
Review by peers / colleagues
Criteria
o Originality
o Accessibility
o Solid evidence of findings
Careful editing process
18. Impact factor?
="Weight" of a scientific journal:
o The more articles from a given scientific journal in other
journals are cited, the higher the impact factor
"Weight" of the researcher : h-index
o More objective
o Criticism
19. Basic attitude = Skeptical
… especially when the material found supports your thesis
28. Which database should you use?
Depending on your field (Ex. Pubmed for medical sciences, Jstor
for the hunamities, etc.)
29. Online databases: Where to start?
Library catalogue:
http://biblio.vub.ac.be/vubissmartweb/Vubis.csp
Overview databases:
http://www.vub.ac.be/BIBLIO/ubwebsite_database_alpha.html
Library general information
http://www.vub.ac.be/BIBLIO
30.
31.
32.
33. Paywalls and Open Access
Paywall= pay for access
o IP-adres
o VUBnet NetID and password
Open Access
o Free access
o What business model?
oEx. PLoS one, Doaj, arXiv
34. Examples of external sources
Images
o http://www.metmuseum.org/collection/the-collection-online
o http://closertovaneyck.kikirpa.be/
o https://archive.org/details/paulotlet
Audio
o http://research.culturalequity.org/rc-b2/home-audio.jsp
Lectures
o http://videolectures.net/
o http://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm
o Itunes University
39. Storing and organizing
references (citations)
Editing of bibliographic data
Exporting bibliographies
Management of full-text docs
Integration into word
processing software
What can you do with a reference manager?
42. Alternatives
Open-source
Web app and desktop
Center for History and
New Media of George Mason
University
Free
300MB webspace
Originally an add-on for
firefox