This lecture has been prepared by Ammar Younas, Senior Lecturer in Commercial Law at Westminster International University in Tashkent for the Class of 2019-2020 Introduction to Business Law.
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION- ISSUES AND CHALLENGESAmudha Mony
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms like arbitration, mediation, and conciliation provide alternatives to litigation for resolving disputes. Arbitration is voluntary, has lower costs than litigation, and allows for faster and more private dispute resolution. Mediation involves a neutral third party who helps parties communicate and negotiate to reach a mutually agreeable settlement. Conciliation also uses a neutral party to bring sides together to resolve disputes through good offices rather than rendering an award. However, implementing ADR in India faces challenges like attitudes resistant to settlement, ignorance of ADR options, corruption, and lack of guaranteed final decisions.
1) ADR methods like mediation and arbitration provide alternatives to litigation that are usually cheaper, faster, and less adversarial. They allow parties more control over outcomes.
2) Common ADR methods include negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and tribunals. Mediation involves a neutral third party facilitating compromise, while arbitration involves a third party making a binding decision.
3) Tribunals are bodies that resolve disputes but are not courts, handling issues like immigration, benefits, and employment claims more informally than courts. They aim to be accessible and efficient alternatives.
Dispute resolution & Grievance HandlingGheethu Joy
This presentation includes notes collected from various sources from internet during my study journey with regard to the topic Dispute resolution & Grievance Handling
The document provides an overview of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in India. It discusses the problems and delays faced by the court system that necessitate ADR mechanisms. It outlines various ADR methods like negotiation, conciliation, mediation and arbitration. It discusses the Lok Adalat system established under the Legal Services Authority Act and highlights advantages of ADR like lower costs, flexibility and faster resolutions compared to litigation. The document also notes some limitations of ADR and the importance of a supportive legal framework and cultural norms for ADR effectiveness.
The document discusses various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods for resolving civil legal disputes outside of court. It defines ADR and describes negotiation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration processes. Negotiation involves parties discussing solutions without legal representation, while mediation uses an impartial third party to direct discussion. Conciliation is similar but the third party can make suggestions, and arbitration involves a third party making a binding decision. The document outlines advantages like time and cost savings compared to litigation, and disadvantages such as non-binding decisions and need for voluntary participation.
Arbitration as a method of resolving disputes Ishaan Savla
1) Arbitration is a formal process where a private third party arbitrator makes a binding decision to resolve disputes instead of going through litigation.
2) It has been used internationally since the late 19th century to resolve conflicts between countries in a private manner.
3) Arbitration results in a final ruling, unlike mediation which facilitates negotiations, and the rulings can be enforced globally through treaties like the 1958 New York Convention.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) involves resolving civil disputes through means other than the formal court system. The Woolf Report recommended ADR to reduce court caseloads, provide a cheaper and less adversarial form of justice. ADR methods like mediation and arbitration can resolve disputes more quickly and at lower cost than going to court, though outcomes may not be legally binding or rely on legal expertise. Common ADR approaches include mediation, conciliation, arbitration, negotiation, ombudsmen, and tribunals.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a Mechanism of Peace in AfricaChantal Abam
conflict resolution has always been an issue of the Criminal Justice System at the international and national levels, but globalization thinking has brought about new mechanism for resolving conflicts.
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION- ISSUES AND CHALLENGESAmudha Mony
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms like arbitration, mediation, and conciliation provide alternatives to litigation for resolving disputes. Arbitration is voluntary, has lower costs than litigation, and allows for faster and more private dispute resolution. Mediation involves a neutral third party who helps parties communicate and negotiate to reach a mutually agreeable settlement. Conciliation also uses a neutral party to bring sides together to resolve disputes through good offices rather than rendering an award. However, implementing ADR in India faces challenges like attitudes resistant to settlement, ignorance of ADR options, corruption, and lack of guaranteed final decisions.
1) ADR methods like mediation and arbitration provide alternatives to litigation that are usually cheaper, faster, and less adversarial. They allow parties more control over outcomes.
2) Common ADR methods include negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and tribunals. Mediation involves a neutral third party facilitating compromise, while arbitration involves a third party making a binding decision.
3) Tribunals are bodies that resolve disputes but are not courts, handling issues like immigration, benefits, and employment claims more informally than courts. They aim to be accessible and efficient alternatives.
Dispute resolution & Grievance HandlingGheethu Joy
This presentation includes notes collected from various sources from internet during my study journey with regard to the topic Dispute resolution & Grievance Handling
The document provides an overview of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in India. It discusses the problems and delays faced by the court system that necessitate ADR mechanisms. It outlines various ADR methods like negotiation, conciliation, mediation and arbitration. It discusses the Lok Adalat system established under the Legal Services Authority Act and highlights advantages of ADR like lower costs, flexibility and faster resolutions compared to litigation. The document also notes some limitations of ADR and the importance of a supportive legal framework and cultural norms for ADR effectiveness.
The document discusses various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods for resolving civil legal disputes outside of court. It defines ADR and describes negotiation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration processes. Negotiation involves parties discussing solutions without legal representation, while mediation uses an impartial third party to direct discussion. Conciliation is similar but the third party can make suggestions, and arbitration involves a third party making a binding decision. The document outlines advantages like time and cost savings compared to litigation, and disadvantages such as non-binding decisions and need for voluntary participation.
Arbitration as a method of resolving disputes Ishaan Savla
1) Arbitration is a formal process where a private third party arbitrator makes a binding decision to resolve disputes instead of going through litigation.
2) It has been used internationally since the late 19th century to resolve conflicts between countries in a private manner.
3) Arbitration results in a final ruling, unlike mediation which facilitates negotiations, and the rulings can be enforced globally through treaties like the 1958 New York Convention.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) involves resolving civil disputes through means other than the formal court system. The Woolf Report recommended ADR to reduce court caseloads, provide a cheaper and less adversarial form of justice. ADR methods like mediation and arbitration can resolve disputes more quickly and at lower cost than going to court, though outcomes may not be legally binding or rely on legal expertise. Common ADR approaches include mediation, conciliation, arbitration, negotiation, ombudsmen, and tribunals.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a Mechanism of Peace in AfricaChantal Abam
conflict resolution has always been an issue of the Criminal Justice System at the international and national levels, but globalization thinking has brought about new mechanism for resolving conflicts.
This document discusses conflict and dispute management. It begins by defining different levels of conflict, including intrapersonal, interpersonal, intergroup, and international. Sources of conflict include personal differences, incompatible goals/roles, organizational climate/change, social differences, limited resources, and communication gaps.
Methods of conflict resolution include avoidance, diffusion, containment, confrontation, conciliation, mediation, arbitration, and litigation. Dispute resolution methods discussed are adjudication and arbitration. Adjudication involves a third party making a binding decision, while arbitration refers disputes being decided by an arbitrator.
The key differences between mediation, adjudication, arbitration, and litigation are also summarized, such as costs, timeframes,
Alternative dipsute resolution system is informal method of resolving conflicts. there are different modes of ADR viz., negotiations, mediation , conciliation and arbitration etc.
This document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques for resolving disputes outside of litigation. It defines ADR as approaches that resolve conflicts in a non-confrontational manner. The document then lists and describes the main ADR types: negotiation, mediation, arbitration, ombuds, and family group conferences. Negotiation involves voluntary participation with no third party, while mediation uses a third party facilitator. Arbitration employs a third party to impose a resolution. Ombuds and family group conferences are also discussed. The document concludes that the appropriate ADR technique depends on each situation.
This document discusses various dispute resolution methods, beginning with avoidance and negotiation, then exploring mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and litigation. It provides definitions and explanations of each method, including how they differ in terms of the level of third party involvement and whether the outcome is binding or non-binding. Examples of each method are given. Professional arbitration bodies and centers in Nigeria and other countries are also listed.
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) refers to ways of resolving disputes outside of litigation, such as negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and collaborative processes. ADR methods are commonly used in family law cases as they often result in more satisfied clients and allow the parties to voluntarily reach mutually agreeable settlements. Key ADR approaches discussed in the document include negotiation between the parties or their lawyers, mediation which uses a neutral third party to facilitate discussion, and arbitration where a third party makes a binding decision.
This document discusses various dispute resolution methods for construction, planning, and scheduling projects. It begins by defining dispute resolution as bringing discordant parties to understanding by ironing out their differences. Several dispute resolution methods are then outlined, including avoidance, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and litigation. Hybrid methods and alternative dispute resolution are also discussed. For each method, a brief definition or example is provided. The document provides information on applying various methods like mediation, conciliation, arbitration in Nigeria. It also lists several professional arbitration bodies and centers in Nigeria and other countries.
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) describes ways for parties to settle civil disputes without formal court hearings, using arbitration, mediation, or conciliation with an independent third party. Common types of ADR include arbitration, where a specialist decides the dispute, and mediation, where an independent mediator helps facilitate settlement discussions between the parties. The Civil Procedure Rules encourage parties to attempt ADR before full litigation and courts can impose costs penalties if parties unreasonably refuse ADR offers.
This document summarizes key aspects of arbitration based on a presentation by Dr. Deepa Pravin Patil. It defines arbitration as a dispute resolution process where impartial adjudicators chosen by the parties make a final and binding decision. It notes some fundamental features of arbitration include being an alternative to courts, allowing parties to control the process, and having enforceable awards. The document discusses the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 in India and types of arbitration like institutional, ad hoc, and international. It provides an overview of topics like arbitration agreements, composition of tribunals, the tribunal's jurisdiction, conduct of proceedings, making awards, termination of proceedings, and challenging awards.
Mediation is great option for legal cases. It is a concept which is here to stay. All the litigants can take advantage of the same and all o them can be winner.
Get all the information related to companies act 2013/1956 including its rules, draft rules, forms, notifications, circulars, orders, definitions, guidelines, schedules, etc.
https://www.nclt.in/
1. Mediation provides parties with control over the outcome of their dispute, allowing them to decide their own futures, unlike litigation where a third party decides.
2. Mediation costs significantly less than litigation, which can involve five or six figure legal fees and lengthy delays before a final decision is reached.
3. Through a skilled neutral mediator, parties have the opportunity to fully explain their positions and explore alternatives for mutual benefit, unlike the constraints of litigation.
The document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods in India. It describes arbitration as a process where disagreeing parties agree to be bound by a third party's decision. Mediation involves a third party helping the two sides reach a settlement. Laws like the Civil Procedure Code and Arbitration and Conciliation Act promote ADR methods like lok adalats and consumer forums to provide faster and cheaper resolution compared to litigation. Common ADR methods mentioned are arbitration, mediation, conciliation, lok adalats and consumer redressal forums.
Alternative Dispute Resolution has become the primary means by which cases are resolved now days, especially commercial, business disputes. It has emerged as the preferred method for resolving civil cases, with litigation as a last resort. Alternative Dispute Resolution provides an overview of the statutory, procedural, and case law underlining these processes and their interplay with litigation. A significant theme is the evolving role of
professional ethics for attorneys operating in non-adversarial settings. Clients and courts increasingly express a preference for attorneys who are skilled not only in litigation but in problem-solving, which costs the clients less in terms of time, money and relationship. The law of ADR also provides an introduction to negotiation and mediation theory.
The document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in India. It notes that ADR was introduced in India to help address the huge backlog of cases overwhelming the court system. ADR provides parties more cost-effective and timely mechanisms to resolve disputes through negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and conciliation outside of litigation. The growth of ADR in India has helped promote access to justice and reduce strain on the courts.
This document provides an overview of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods. It introduces ADR and defines it as any means of settling disputes without litigation. The main ADR methods discussed are mediation, arbitration, neutral evaluation, negotiation and conciliation. Mediation uses a neutral third party to help parties reach an agreement. Arbitration involves binding decisions by expert arbitrators. Neutral evaluation involves early case presentations to a neutral expert. Negotiation and conciliation allow parties to explore solutions with the help of a third party. Other methods mentioned include expert determination, appointing an independent solicitor, and collaborative law.
This document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods. It outlines five main types of ADR: negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and collaborative law. Negotiation involves parties discussing to find an agreed solution without being binding. Mediation uses an impartial third party to direct discussion but not suggest outcomes. Conciliation is like mediation but the third party can make suggestions. Arbitration uses a third party to impose a binding decision. Collaborative law involves lawyers collaborating to settle without litigation. Advantages of ADR include being less formal, cheaper and faster than courts. Disadvantages are some disputes not being suitable and decisions not always legally binding.
Conciliation is a voluntary alternative dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party (conciliator) assists parties in reaching an amicable settlement. The conciliator facilitates negotiations but may also propose non-binding settlement options. It is a confidential and flexible process like mediation but the conciliator can propose solutions. The Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act legally recognizes settlements reached through conciliation. Conciliation has a high success rate and allows parties to efficiently and cost-effectively resolve disputes while maintaining business relationships.
The document discusses various methods for resolving disputes, including litigation and alternative dispute resolution. It provides details on civil and criminal court processes, as well as hierarchical court structures. It also outlines pre-trial procedures, trials, judgments, and methods of enforcing judgments. Additionally, it discusses administrative law and tribunals, judicial review, and alternative dispute resolution methods like negotiation, mediation, and arbitration.
Get all the information related to companies act 2013/1956 including its rules, draft rules, forms, notifications, circulars, orders, definitions, guidelines, schedules, etc.
https://www.nclt.in/about.php
1. Gandhiji believed the true function of a lawyer was to unite parties and he spent much of his time bringing about private compromises rather than costly litigation.
2. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods provide alternatives to full legal proceedings and aim to resolve disputes through more collaborative means like arbitration, mediation, and negotiation.
3. While ADR methods like arbitration can provide faster and less expensive dispute resolution, they are also criticized for lacking transparency and enforceability compared to litigation.
ADR (alternative dispute resolution) methods like mediation, conciliation, arbitration and tribunals provide easier and simpler processes for resolving disputes compared to going to court. Mediation uses a neutral third party to facilitate communication between disputing parties to help them find a mutually agreeable solution. Conciliation similarly uses a neutral party to help lower tensions and find a solution, addressing the needs of both sides. Arbitration involves voluntarily submitting a dispute to a non-judge arbitrator, allowing for private, flexible resolution of conflicts without unnecessary costs or delays. Tribunals provide expertise in specialized areas like benefits, taxes, immigration and more to resolve cases in a cheaper, quicker and informal manner than courts.
This document discusses conflict and dispute management. It begins by defining different levels of conflict, including intrapersonal, interpersonal, intergroup, and international. Sources of conflict include personal differences, incompatible goals/roles, organizational climate/change, social differences, limited resources, and communication gaps.
Methods of conflict resolution include avoidance, diffusion, containment, confrontation, conciliation, mediation, arbitration, and litigation. Dispute resolution methods discussed are adjudication and arbitration. Adjudication involves a third party making a binding decision, while arbitration refers disputes being decided by an arbitrator.
The key differences between mediation, adjudication, arbitration, and litigation are also summarized, such as costs, timeframes,
Alternative dipsute resolution system is informal method of resolving conflicts. there are different modes of ADR viz., negotiations, mediation , conciliation and arbitration etc.
This document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques for resolving disputes outside of litigation. It defines ADR as approaches that resolve conflicts in a non-confrontational manner. The document then lists and describes the main ADR types: negotiation, mediation, arbitration, ombuds, and family group conferences. Negotiation involves voluntary participation with no third party, while mediation uses a third party facilitator. Arbitration employs a third party to impose a resolution. Ombuds and family group conferences are also discussed. The document concludes that the appropriate ADR technique depends on each situation.
This document discusses various dispute resolution methods, beginning with avoidance and negotiation, then exploring mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and litigation. It provides definitions and explanations of each method, including how they differ in terms of the level of third party involvement and whether the outcome is binding or non-binding. Examples of each method are given. Professional arbitration bodies and centers in Nigeria and other countries are also listed.
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) refers to ways of resolving disputes outside of litigation, such as negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and collaborative processes. ADR methods are commonly used in family law cases as they often result in more satisfied clients and allow the parties to voluntarily reach mutually agreeable settlements. Key ADR approaches discussed in the document include negotiation between the parties or their lawyers, mediation which uses a neutral third party to facilitate discussion, and arbitration where a third party makes a binding decision.
This document discusses various dispute resolution methods for construction, planning, and scheduling projects. It begins by defining dispute resolution as bringing discordant parties to understanding by ironing out their differences. Several dispute resolution methods are then outlined, including avoidance, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and litigation. Hybrid methods and alternative dispute resolution are also discussed. For each method, a brief definition or example is provided. The document provides information on applying various methods like mediation, conciliation, arbitration in Nigeria. It also lists several professional arbitration bodies and centers in Nigeria and other countries.
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) describes ways for parties to settle civil disputes without formal court hearings, using arbitration, mediation, or conciliation with an independent third party. Common types of ADR include arbitration, where a specialist decides the dispute, and mediation, where an independent mediator helps facilitate settlement discussions between the parties. The Civil Procedure Rules encourage parties to attempt ADR before full litigation and courts can impose costs penalties if parties unreasonably refuse ADR offers.
This document summarizes key aspects of arbitration based on a presentation by Dr. Deepa Pravin Patil. It defines arbitration as a dispute resolution process where impartial adjudicators chosen by the parties make a final and binding decision. It notes some fundamental features of arbitration include being an alternative to courts, allowing parties to control the process, and having enforceable awards. The document discusses the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 in India and types of arbitration like institutional, ad hoc, and international. It provides an overview of topics like arbitration agreements, composition of tribunals, the tribunal's jurisdiction, conduct of proceedings, making awards, termination of proceedings, and challenging awards.
Mediation is great option for legal cases. It is a concept which is here to stay. All the litigants can take advantage of the same and all o them can be winner.
Get all the information related to companies act 2013/1956 including its rules, draft rules, forms, notifications, circulars, orders, definitions, guidelines, schedules, etc.
https://www.nclt.in/
1. Mediation provides parties with control over the outcome of their dispute, allowing them to decide their own futures, unlike litigation where a third party decides.
2. Mediation costs significantly less than litigation, which can involve five or six figure legal fees and lengthy delays before a final decision is reached.
3. Through a skilled neutral mediator, parties have the opportunity to fully explain their positions and explore alternatives for mutual benefit, unlike the constraints of litigation.
The document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods in India. It describes arbitration as a process where disagreeing parties agree to be bound by a third party's decision. Mediation involves a third party helping the two sides reach a settlement. Laws like the Civil Procedure Code and Arbitration and Conciliation Act promote ADR methods like lok adalats and consumer forums to provide faster and cheaper resolution compared to litigation. Common ADR methods mentioned are arbitration, mediation, conciliation, lok adalats and consumer redressal forums.
Alternative Dispute Resolution has become the primary means by which cases are resolved now days, especially commercial, business disputes. It has emerged as the preferred method for resolving civil cases, with litigation as a last resort. Alternative Dispute Resolution provides an overview of the statutory, procedural, and case law underlining these processes and their interplay with litigation. A significant theme is the evolving role of
professional ethics for attorneys operating in non-adversarial settings. Clients and courts increasingly express a preference for attorneys who are skilled not only in litigation but in problem-solving, which costs the clients less in terms of time, money and relationship. The law of ADR also provides an introduction to negotiation and mediation theory.
The document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in India. It notes that ADR was introduced in India to help address the huge backlog of cases overwhelming the court system. ADR provides parties more cost-effective and timely mechanisms to resolve disputes through negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and conciliation outside of litigation. The growth of ADR in India has helped promote access to justice and reduce strain on the courts.
This document provides an overview of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods. It introduces ADR and defines it as any means of settling disputes without litigation. The main ADR methods discussed are mediation, arbitration, neutral evaluation, negotiation and conciliation. Mediation uses a neutral third party to help parties reach an agreement. Arbitration involves binding decisions by expert arbitrators. Neutral evaluation involves early case presentations to a neutral expert. Negotiation and conciliation allow parties to explore solutions with the help of a third party. Other methods mentioned include expert determination, appointing an independent solicitor, and collaborative law.
This document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods. It outlines five main types of ADR: negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and collaborative law. Negotiation involves parties discussing to find an agreed solution without being binding. Mediation uses an impartial third party to direct discussion but not suggest outcomes. Conciliation is like mediation but the third party can make suggestions. Arbitration uses a third party to impose a binding decision. Collaborative law involves lawyers collaborating to settle without litigation. Advantages of ADR include being less formal, cheaper and faster than courts. Disadvantages are some disputes not being suitable and decisions not always legally binding.
Conciliation is a voluntary alternative dispute resolution process in which a neutral third party (conciliator) assists parties in reaching an amicable settlement. The conciliator facilitates negotiations but may also propose non-binding settlement options. It is a confidential and flexible process like mediation but the conciliator can propose solutions. The Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act legally recognizes settlements reached through conciliation. Conciliation has a high success rate and allows parties to efficiently and cost-effectively resolve disputes while maintaining business relationships.
The document discusses various methods for resolving disputes, including litigation and alternative dispute resolution. It provides details on civil and criminal court processes, as well as hierarchical court structures. It also outlines pre-trial procedures, trials, judgments, and methods of enforcing judgments. Additionally, it discusses administrative law and tribunals, judicial review, and alternative dispute resolution methods like negotiation, mediation, and arbitration.
Get all the information related to companies act 2013/1956 including its rules, draft rules, forms, notifications, circulars, orders, definitions, guidelines, schedules, etc.
https://www.nclt.in/about.php
1. Gandhiji believed the true function of a lawyer was to unite parties and he spent much of his time bringing about private compromises rather than costly litigation.
2. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods provide alternatives to full legal proceedings and aim to resolve disputes through more collaborative means like arbitration, mediation, and negotiation.
3. While ADR methods like arbitration can provide faster and less expensive dispute resolution, they are also criticized for lacking transparency and enforceability compared to litigation.
ADR (alternative dispute resolution) methods like mediation, conciliation, arbitration and tribunals provide easier and simpler processes for resolving disputes compared to going to court. Mediation uses a neutral third party to facilitate communication between disputing parties to help them find a mutually agreeable solution. Conciliation similarly uses a neutral party to help lower tensions and find a solution, addressing the needs of both sides. Arbitration involves voluntarily submitting a dispute to a non-judge arbitrator, allowing for private, flexible resolution of conflicts without unnecessary costs or delays. Tribunals provide expertise in specialized areas like benefits, taxes, immigration and more to resolve cases in a cheaper, quicker and informal manner than courts.
In response to rising court costs, delays and congestion, the need to facilitate access to justice and to provide more 'effective' forms of dispute resolution, the phenomenon known as ADR was born.
This presentation provides an overview of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and different ADR mechanisms used all over the world.
· IntroductionArbitration refers to dispute resolution is .docxoswald1horne84988
· Introduction
Arbitration refers to dispute resolution is it is a sort of private judicial determination of a given dispute usually by an independent third party. It can involve independent arbitrators or a tribunal that has any given number of arbitrators although in some legal systems, recommend that arbitrators be of an odd number so that they cannot tie. The parties that are disputing normally hand their powers to the arbitrators who should decide on dispute. In one hand, arbitration can be an alternative to a court action. It is also wise to note that arbitration process is so binding. The main aim of arbitrating is to get just and fair resolution of disputes by a third party who are impartial with no delay or much expense. The parties that are involved in a dispute also have to agree on the process of the dispute resolution and courts are not allowed to interfere. These are some principles of arbitration.
Negotiation on the other hand is a dialogue between two or more parties or individuals with the intention of reaching a beneficial outcome on any dispute or conflict(Derains & Schwartz, 2015). In negotiation, the parties should allow each other enough opportunities to be heard so that the conflict can be solved peacefully without involving the courts.
· Arbitration of disputes in Saudi Arabia
In Saudi Arabia, the body that paramount in law is the Shariah. This is a collection or principles that are founded from different given sources such as from the Islamic Holy Quran as well as from the Sunnah that are also based on four Islamic school of jurisprudence; the Hanbali, Hanafi, Maliki and Shafi. There are some statutory enactments that are not present in Saudi Arabian law, such as the law that governs mortgages and other security interests. Shariah Law is also founded from legislation that is adopted in different forms ranging from royal decrees, Council of Ministers resolutions, ministerial resolutions, and even departmental circulars. However, it is good to note that these laws and regulations are in most cases in conflict with the provisions of Shariah because their applications do not align with Islamic principles.
The Basic Law for instance came into action in 1992 and the King during this time dealt with any matter that arose in society. Both the Basic Law, the Consultative Law, the Council of Ministers Law as well as the Provincial Councils Law were all done by the royal king and he also had powers to removal any of them when he decided. In addition, the royal decrees were used in approving any international treaty or concession, amendments or any other enactments that were recommended by the council of ministers(Baamir, 2016). This same council of ministers is given the permission to adopt any resolutions that regulate given issues without any decree from the royalking. On the other hand, resolutions of ministers can be used by any minister according to the power given to then by the given law. These are also the resolution.
The document discusses various techniques of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in India. It describes arbitration, conciliation, mediation and negotiation as the main ADR techniques. Arbitration involves referring a dispute to a third party arbitrator, whose decision is binding. Conciliation and mediation are non-binding processes where a neutral third party helps parties reach a settlement. Negotiation does not involve a third party; parties work directly to find a mutually agreeable solution. The document provides details on the procedures and key aspects of each ADR technique.
This document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR). It defines arbitration and describes its advantages as being cheaper, faster, and allowing parties more control over the process compared to litigation. The document outlines different types of ADR like mediation, conciliation, and negotiation. It notes that ADR provides confidentiality, uses experienced neutral parties, and takes a cooperative approach. The document also discusses disadvantages like potential unequal bargaining power between parties and lack of precedent. Overall, it analyzes the pros and cons of using ADR to resolve disputes compared to traditional litigation.
This document provides an overview of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in India. It defines ADR as resolving disputes through non-litigation methods like arbitration, mediation, negotiation and conciliation. The document traces the history of ADR in India from ancient times to its growing importance today to reduce court backlogs. It discusses how ADR began in village dispute resolution and continued during the Mughal and British rule periods. Major legislation supporting ADR is also outlined, as well as its advantages of faster and cheaper dispute settlement compared to litigation.
This document discusses various dispute resolution methods like arbitration, conciliation, mediation, and negotiation. It provides details on arbitration and conciliation. Arbitration is described as a private judicial determination of a dispute by an independent third party, whose decision is final and binding. Conciliation is defined as the adjustment and settlement of a dispute in a friendly manner through a non-binding third party process. The key principles of conciliation discussed are independence, fairness, confidentiality, and cooperation of parties. The advantages of conciliation include party autonomy, expertise of the decision maker, and efficiency. The conciliation procedure involves parties presenting evidence and arguments to the conciliator. The main objectives of the Indian Arbitration and Conc
The document provides an overview of mediation training by Advocate Santosh A. Shah. It discusses ADR mechanisms like mediation, conciliation, and lok adalat. It explains key differences between mediation and adjudication approaches. The document also outlines qualifications for mediators, procedures for mediation, the role of a mediator, and rules for mediation under the Civil Procedure Code.
arbitration, conciliation and alternate dispute resolution methodsShubhamSharma775952
This document discusses arbitration, conciliation and alternative dispute resolution systems. It defines arbitration as a private dispute resolution process where parties agree to have their dispute decided by an impartial third party, the arbitrator, rather than going to court. Arbitration is preferred over litigation as it is less expensive, provides speedy resolution and is a simpler process. The document outlines different types of arbitrations based on jurisdiction and proceedings. It compares the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 to the Arbitration Act of 1940 and discusses key concepts such as arbitration agreements, appointment of arbitrators, and arbitration tribunals.
U302 part a the victorian civil justice systemCrystal Delosa
The document provides information about resolving civil disputes in Victoria's justice system. It discusses three main avenues for resolving civil disputes - Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV), the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), and courts.
CAV is a complaints body that uses conciliation to resolve disputes over issues like consumer goods and tenancies. VCAT is a tribunal that provides lower-cost alternatives to courts using mediation and hearings before members. It covers areas like building and property disputes. Courts provide formal trials and appeals but involve higher costs and longer timeframes. The document outlines the purposes and processes of these dispute resolution bodies in Victoria.
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION - BBA LLB 5th Year.pptxAman298462
This document provides an introduction to alternative dispute resolution (ADR). It defines ADR as methods to settle disputes without litigation through a neutral third party. The document discusses why ADR arose due to inefficiencies in litigation for many people in India. It outlines the key benefits of ADR such as lower costs and time compared to litigation. The major ADR methods discussed are arbitration, mediation, negotiation, and conciliation. Arbitration involves a binding decision by an arbitrator while mediation aims to help parties reach a mutual settlement through a mediator.
The document discusses the essentials of arbitration agreements. It states that arbitration agreements require parties to resolve disputes through a neutral third-party arbitrator instead of going to court. Contracts often include arbitration clauses that make this dispute resolution process mandatory if disagreements arise. While courts generally support arbitration, they may not enforce clauses if a party was not informed they were forfeiting their right to litigation or if the clause is presented unfairly. The document outlines some concerns about mandatory arbitration clauses preventing whistleblowing, limiting class action lawsuits, and relying on a single arbitrator's decision. It also discusses alternative dispute resolution options like mediation and escalating issues to senior management.
Voluntary arbitration involves two disputing parties agreeing to involve a neutral third party to resolve their conflict. Compulsory arbitration requires parties to accept arbitration without consent. Either type can lead to adjudication, where a lawyer appointed by the government makes a binding decision, through a tiered system of labor courts, industrial tribunals, and national tribunals. While arbitration aims to resolve conflicts efficiently, it also deprives parties of control over the decision and potential bias from the arbitrator.
1. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act was passed in 1996 to consolidate laws around domestic and international arbitration as well as conciliation. It replaced earlier arbitration laws from 1940, 1937, and 1961. (2)
2. The act was influenced by the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration from 1985. It aims to provide an efficient dispute resolution process that is fair and brings parties to an amicable resolution. (3)
3. The act allows for disputes of a civil nature to be referred to arbitration. It recognizes different types of arbitration including ad hoc, institutional, and statutory arbitration. Arbitral awards can be interim or final and are binding on parties.
Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution process where disputes are decided by an impartial third party, called an arbitrator, rather than a court. The arbitrator's decision is legally binding for both sides. Arbitration is commonly used to resolve commercial disputes, especially in international transactions, and sometimes for consumer and employment matters. It can be voluntary or mandatory according to a contract or statute. The key advantages of arbitration are that the parties have more control over the selection of the arbitrator and process, it is often faster than litigation, and arbitration awards are more easily enforced internationally under treaties. However, arbitration also has disadvantages like limited rights to appeal decisions.
A lawsuit is a formal legal process where disputes are heard and decided by an impartial third party, usually a judge. There are typically two parties involved - a plaintiff bringing the lawsuit and a defendant it is brought against. Lawsuits can be civil, involving issues like contracts, money, and property rights, or criminal, concerning enforcement of laws. If unsatisfied with the court's ruling, either party may appeal citing an error made during the trial. It is generally advisable to consult an attorney regarding lawsuits, as they understand the laws and court process.
Folks who have a dispute have options like arbitration or mediation to resolve it. Arbitration involves presenting your case to an arbitrator who makes a final decision, similar to a judge. Mediation involves a mediator helping the parties find an agreed solution, with no decision if no agreement is reached. The main difference is that arbitration has a third party making the final call, while mediation relies on the parties agreeing themselves.
This document discusses dispute resolution methods in construction, including litigation, arbitration, and alternative dispute resolution. It defines key terms like claim, conflict, and dispute. Arbitration is described as the most popular method in construction for resolving formal disputes through a private tribunal appointed by the parties' agreement. Alternative dispute resolution seeks to resolve conflicts privately without litigation and may involve negotiation, mediation, conciliation or other third party involvement. The document examines the history of dispute resolution moving from informal meetings to arbitration to ease court congestion. The arbitration process and alternative methods like dispute review boards are outlined.
Contractual disputes in Vietnam shall be construed as conflicts, disagreements, conflicts between the parties regarding the implementation or non-implementation of rights and obligations in the contract. Disputes could arise in failure to collect the payment from debtor in sales agreement, construction contract disputes between investor and contractor, labour dispute between employer and employee, insurance disputes between ship owner and insurance company.
Visit us at: https://antlawyers.vn/library/contract-dispute-in-vietnam.html
Similar to Legal Conflicts, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration (Ammar Younas) (20)
Technology in Business Law by Ammar YounasAmmar Younas
This lecture has been prepared by Ammar Younas, Senior Lecturer in Commercial Law at Westminster International University in Tashkent for the Class of 2019-2020 Introduction to Business Law.
Commercial Arbitration in Asia (Ammar Younas)Ammar Younas
This lecture has been prepared by Ammar Younas, Senior Lecturer in Commercial Law at Westminster International University in Tashkent for the Class of 2019-2020 Introduction to Business Law.
This lecture has been prepared by Ammar Younas, Senior Lecturer in Commercial Law at Westminster International University in Tashkent for the Class of 2019-2020 Introduction to Business Law.
This lecture has been prepared by Ammar Younas, Senior Lecturer in Commercial Law at Westminster International University in Tashkent for the Class of 2019-2020 Introduction to Business Law.
Shares and Types of Shares (Ammar Younas)Ammar Younas
This lecture has been prepared by Ammar Younas, Senior Lecturer in Commercial Law at Westminster International University in Tashkent for the Class of 2019-2020 Introduction to Business Law.
This lecture has been prepared by Ammar Younas, Senior Lecturer in Commercial Law at Westminster International University in Tashkent for the Class of 2019-2020 Introduction to Business Law.
Incorporation of company (Ammar Younas)Ammar Younas
This lecture has been prepared by Ammar Younas, Senior Lecturer in Commercial Law at Westminster International University in Tashkent for the Class of 2019-2020 Introduction to Business Law.
This lecture has been prepared by Ammar Younas, Senior Lecturer in Commercial Law at Westminster International University in Tashkent for the Class of 2019-2020 Introduction to Business Law.
Nexus between Business and Law (Ammar Younas) Ammar Younas
These slides had been used for Introduction to Business Law class at Westminster International University in Tashkent by Senior Lecturer in Law Ammar Younas.
A Critical Study of ICC Prosecutor's Move on GAZA WarNilendra Kumar
ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan's proposal to its judges seeking permission to prosecute Israeli leaders and Hamas commanders for crimes against the law of war has serious ramifications and calls deep scrutiny.
Capital Punishment by Saif Javed (LLM)ppt.pptxOmGod1
This PowerPoint presentation, titled "Capital Punishment in India: Constitutionality and Rarest of Rare Principle," is a comprehensive exploration of the death penalty within the Indian criminal justice system. Authored by Saif Javed, an LL.M student specializing in Criminal Law and Criminology at Kazi Nazrul University, the presentation delves into the constitutional aspects and ethical debates surrounding capital punishment. It examines key legal provisions, significant case laws, and the specific categories of offenders excluded from the death penalty. The presentation also discusses recent recommendations by the Law Commission of India regarding the gradual abolishment of capital punishment, except for terrorism-related offenses. This detailed analysis aims to foster informed discussions on the future of the death penalty in India.
Indonesian Manpower Regulation on Severance Pay for Retiring Private Sector E...AHRP Law Firm
Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower has been partially revoked and amended several times, with the latest amendment made through Law Number 6 of 2023. Attention is drawn to a specific part of the Manpower Law concerning severance pay. This aspect is undoubtedly one of the most crucial parts regulated by the Manpower Law. It is essential for both employers and employees to abide by the law, fulfill their obligations, and retain their rights regarding this matter.
Reviewing contracts swiftly and efficiently is crucial for any organization. It ensures compliance, reduces risks, and keeps business operations running smoothly.
4. PANCHAYAT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT
SYSTEM, AND ADR
https://www.zeepedia.com/read.php?panchayat_local_government_system_and_adr_definitions_of_pa
nchayat_definition_of_jirga_conflict_managment&b=30&c=44Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
7. DEFINITION OF THE CONFLICT
• How can we name opposition of interests?
•Disagreement » opinion differences or simply differences in
points of view.
• Conflict » disagreement followed by actions against each
other.
• Dispute » disagreement connected with violation of rights
(legal concept).
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
8. The same issue may cause disagreement, conflict,
dispute or even WAR!
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
9. Main Alternative Dispute Resolution
Methods
• Negotiations
• Mediation
• Arbitration
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
10. NEGOTIATIONS
• This type of ADR aims for the parties to settle the dispute by negotiating
and deliberating with each other with the attendance of their attorneys if
needed, without intervention of any third party.
Main features of negotiations:
almost always attempted first to resolve a dispute;
• allows the parties to meet in order to settle a dispute;
• allows the parties themselves to control the process and the solution;
• do not requires involvement of the third party;
• informal, low cost, high speed private future oriented procedure;
• helps to restore relations.
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
11. MEDIATION
• This type of ADR means the settlement of a dispute by setting up an
independent person between two contending parties in order to aid them in the
settlement of their disagreement.
Main features of mediation:
• allows the parties themselves to control the process and the solution;
• requires involvement of the third neutral party (mediator);
• mediator bring opposing parties together and encourages
• them to work out a settlement;
• informal, low cost, high speed, private, future oriented,
• voluntary procedure;
• helps to restore relations;
• focuses on underlying interests. Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
12. ARBITRATION
• This type of ADR means the hearing and determining of a dispute between parties by a
person or persons (arbitrators) chosen or agreed to by the parties. Arbitration award is
recognized and enforceable under the law.
Main features of arbitration:
• voluntary (on the bases of arbitration clause or agreement);
• parties can agree on arbitral panel, procedural rules, language, applicable law, place
of hearings and etc.;
• decision is mandatory to follow;
• formal, more expensive, slower and past oriented private procedure;
• focuses more on legal issues and do not take into considerations
• other aspects, what might be important;
• not all disputes may be resolved in arbitration.
• Arbitration might be binding and non-binding.
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
13. HYBRID PROCEDURES
• These ADR methods combines two or more traditional ADR methods
(negotiations, mediation and arbitration).
Main hybrid procedures:
• MedArb (third person starts as a mediator but in the event of a failure of
mediation, the arbitrator imposes a binding decision);
• ArbMed (during the arbitration process, mediation is applied. In case of
its failure, arbitrator imposes a binding decision);
• Neutral evaluation (expert in certain area investigates the case material
and informs parties about the strong and weak points of their positions);
• Private judging / rent a judge (presenting case to a retired or former judge
in a privately maintained courtroom with all the appurtenances of the
formal judicial process).
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
15. HOW TO CHOOSE MOST APPROPRIATE
DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHOD?
Please take into account:
• character of a dispute;
• personal features of the parties;
• negotiation style of the parties;
• financial status of the parties;
• time limits for resolution;
• duration of relations between the parties;
• level of personal emotional involvement of the parties into a dispute;
• level of the conflict escalation
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
21. ESCALATION
OF
CONFLICT
• In order to choose correctly the certain dispute resolution method it is
advisable to use Glasl‘s model of „Conflict escalation stages“.
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
23. • 5th stage – Loss of Face 7th stage – Limited destructive bowls
6th stage – Strategies of Threats 8th stage - Fragmentation
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
24. 9th stage – Together into Abyss
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
25. STAGE OF ESCALATION AS KEY FOR
CHOOSING ADR METHOD
1.Hardening
of positions
2.Debates
and
Polemics
3.No more
words but
action
4.Images &
group
building
5. Loss
of face
6. Strategy
of
threatening
7. Limited
destruction
8.Fragmen-
tation
9.Together
into the
abyss
------------ Negotiation ------------------
--- Facilitation ----
-------------------------------- Mediation -------------------------------
-------------- Arbitration / Llitigation -----------
Power
decisions
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
27. lack of diversity
Female partners on inaternational
arbitration teams:
~ 11%
Female arbitrators on international
arbitration tribunals:
~ 6%
Females around the world:
~ 50%
Female law students:
~ 60%
Female partners in international law
firms
~ 20%
Sources:
Lucy Greenwood, Getting a
Better Balance on
International Arbitration
Tribunals (2013)
Lucy Greenwood, ‘Unblocking
the Pipeline: Achieving
Greater Gender Diversity on
International Arbitration
Tribunals, International Law
News (2013, Vol 42)
Roughly, for
every 10
individuals
around you …
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
29. What is Arbitration?
• Arbitration is a private method of dispute resolution
chosen by the parties themselves as an effective way
of putting an end to disputes between them without
recourse to the courts of law
• It is conducted in different countries and against
different legal and cultural backgrounds with a
striking lack of formality
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
30. What is Arbitration?
• Arbitration was mainly conceived in
the past as an institution of peace,
the purpose of which was not
primarily to ensure the rule of law,
but rather to maintain harmony
between persons who were destined
to live together
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
32. Four Significant Features of Arbitration
•The agreement to arbitrate
•The choice of arbitrators
•The decision of the arbitral tribunal
•The enforcement of the award
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
33. The Agreement to
Arbitrate
• An agreement by the parties to submit to
arbitration any disputes or differences
between them
• Arbitration agreement can be contained in
the main contract as an arbitration clause
or in submission to arbitration
• Also, agreements to arbitrate may be
contained in bilateral investment treaties
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
34. The Agreement to
Arbitrate
• Arbitration agreement shows that the
parties have consented to resolve their
disputes by arbitration. This element of
consent is essential. Without it, there
can be no valid arbitration
• Once the parties have given their
consent to arbitration, this consent
cannot be unilaterally withdrawn
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
35. The Agreement to Arbitrate:
The Principe of Separability
• Even if the arbitration agreement forms
part of the original contract between
the parties and that contract comes to
an end, the obligation to arbitrate
survives it. It is an independent
obligation separable from the rest of the
contract
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
36. The Agreement to Arbitrate
• If one of the parties to an AA brings
proceedings in a national court in
breach of that agreement, those
proceedings will be stopped at the
request of any other party to the AA
(unless there is a good reason why
they should not be)
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
37. The Agreement to Arbitrate
• AA is a basic source of the powers of the
arbitral tribunal. In principle, an arbitral
tribunal may exercise such powers as the
parties are entitled to confer and do confer
upon it
• In the arbitral process, the jurisdiction of the
arbitral tribunal is derived simply and solely
from the agreement of the parties
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
38. The Choice of Arbitrators
• One of the features that distinguishes arbitration from
litigation is the fact that the parties to an arbitration
are free to choose their own tribunal
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
39. The Decision of the Arbitral
Tribunal
•Consent award, the UNCITRAL
Rules
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
40. The Decision of the Arbitral
Tribunal
•However, if the parties cannot
resolve their dispute, the task
of the arbitral tribunal is to
resolve the dispute for them by
making a decision in the form
of a written award
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
41. The Enforcement of the Award
• Although the arbitral proceedings are the
private process, the award constitutes a
binding decision on the dispute between
the parties
• If it is not carried out voluntarily, the
award may be enforced by legal
proceedings both locally and
internationally
• The New York Convention on the
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
42. Arbitrability
• There are some disputes, which in the
words of the New York Convention, concern
a subject-matter, which is not capable of
settlement by arbitration
• Family disputes, labor disputes, criminal
cases, and others are not arbitrable
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
43. Why Arbitrate?
• Two principal reasons
• A neutral forum and a neutral tribunal
• Enforceable award under the NY Convention
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
44. Why Arbitrate?: Reasons
• If parties did not choose ADR, they would have
to start the proceedings in the court of law,
where the dispute has arisen. This would
mean unfamiliar court proceedings, expensive
translation, hiring legal experts, and etc
• On the other hand, if a reference is made to
arbitration, then the dispute is likely to be
determined in a neutral forum or place of
arbitration rather than on the home ground of
one party or the other
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
45. Why Arbitrate?: Reasons
• One or more arbitrators may be chosen
for their special skill and expertise in
spheres
• Arbitral proceedings are more flexible
and confidential than court proceedings
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
46. The Disadvantages of
Arbitration
Costs
• Arbitration is not necessarily a cheaper
method of resolving disputes than
litigation
• First, the fees and expenses of the
arbitrators (unlike the salary of a judge)
must be paid by the parties
• It may also be necessary to pay the
administrative fees and expenses of an
arbitral institution
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
47. The Disadvantages of
Arbitration
Costs
• If the services of a specialized arbitral
institution are not used, it may be
necessary to appoint a secretary or
registrar to administer the proceedings
• It will be necessary to hire rooms for
meeting and hearings, rather than making
use of the public facilities of the courts of
law
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
48. The Disadvantages of
Arbitration
Limited powers of arbitrators
• In general the powers accorded to arbitrators
fall short of those conferred upon a court of
law. For example, the power to require the
attendance of witnesses under the penalty of
fine or imprisonment are powers, which form
part of the prerogative of the state
• However, if it is necessary to take coercive
actions, arbitral tribunal can do so indirectly
through courts
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
49. The Disadvantages of
Arbitration
No joinder of the parties
• In general it is not possible to bring
multi-party disputes together
before the same AT
• Unlike a national court of law, an AT
has no power to order
consolidation of actions even if this
would seem to be necessary or
desirable in the interests of justice
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
51. Types of Arbitration
• Ad hoc
• Arbitration, which is conducted
pursuant to rules agreed by the
parties themselves or laid down by
the AT
• Parties are free to work out and
establish rules of procedure for
themselves
• It is very important especially when
one of the parties is a state
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)
52. Types of Arbitration
• Institutional arbitration
• Arbitration, which is administered by a
specialist arbitral institution under its own
rules of arbitration
• There are many such institutions such as
International Centre for the Settlement of
Investment Disputes, the International Court
of Arbitration of International Chamber of
Commerce, London Court of International
Arbitration, and others
Ammar Younas (ayounas@wiut.uz)