Kinesemediaologists
            presents a

 Muskoka Leadership Retreat




  August 15th, 16th, 17th 2012
Our Leaders

Clayton Wong         Leanne Phillips   Paul Gill




Brianne Hurley       Tori Petersen     Mia Giffen




                     Darren Gonzales
Prologue



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pnnsx-55NCI
Dyadic
The textbook translation of dyadic is:                the individualized relationship
                 between a leader and each follower in a work unit




  In turn, the dyadic theory: is an approach to
leadership that attempts to explain why leaders
  vary their behaviour with different followers




This theory argues that there is not one leadership quality that will get the same reaction
                            from every follower in the work unit.
Instead, there is separate relationships between a leader and followers that will motivate
   different reactions to the leader, whether it be positive or negative or everything in
                                          between
Dyadic
     The dyadic approach has four stages of development:



The Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory (VDL)



  The Leader-Member Exchange (LMX)




             Team Building




         Systems and Network
Workplace Web
Throw ball of yarn around the class until all participating students have a ‘corner’.
         When you catch the yarn, identify your position within the school.
 Pick a position to be eliminated, designated student will let go of their corner.

    Positions on either side of released yarn must also let go of their corner.




                                 What is the result of this chain reaction?
Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory
A leader creates a one-on-one relationship with followers


Often leads to:

       - In groups
      - Out groups
In Groups


     -   Strong social ties
     -   High mutual trust
     -   Respect
     -   Loyalty
     -   Influence
Out Groups

- Few or no social ties


                          - Strictly work related




- Task-centred
Delegation
- To assign tasks and responsibility to accomplish objectives




                   Delegating
               - Giving employees new tasks
Helium Stick



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxTNsa1mMqA
Helium Stick
                                 Now it’s your turn to play !
   Only the leader is allowed to speak and can administer
    one other person to talk at a time.
   Line up in two rows which face each other.
   Ask participants to point their index fingers and hold their
    arms out.
   Lay the Helium Stick down on their fingers.  Get the group
    to adjust their finger heights until the Helium Stick is
    horizontal and everyone's index fingers are touching the
    stick.
Pros for Manager



- more time for high-priority task


- lessen work load


- increased communication with employee
Pros for Employee
trains employee
improves self-esteem
increase communication with manager
opportunity to prove capability
LMX Theory
Leader - Member Exchange Theory
             The quality of exchange relationship between an
             employee and his/her superior.
LMX Theory

                                  High Quality
                                  Exchange
                                    • Better social support
                                    • More recourses
                                    • More guidance for
                                      Career Development




Low Quality
Exchange
  • Less support
  • More formal supervision
  • Little or no involvement in
     decision making
LMX Theory
High Quality Exchange




 Followers reciprocate with

   – Citizenship behaviours
   – Excellent performance
LMX Theory
Underlying Assumption

      • Leaders do not interact with everyone EQUALLY


      • Leads to different qualities of exchanges
LMX Theory
                                Strong Social Ties
                                              (In group)
                                • Receive higher
                                  performance
                                  rating
Weak Social Ties
            (Out group)
                                • Provide higher
                                  positive feedback
• Receive Lower                  (about the company)


  performance
  rating
• Provide lesser
  positive
  feedback         (about the
 company)
LMX Theory
Social Capital


                      Follower(s)              Leader(s)

                  • are expected to       • Have to pay
                                            attention
                      work harder
                  • be loyal              • Remain responsive
                  • have more admin         to needs and feelings
                     duties               • Cannot resort to
                  • This helps them get     coercion
                     ahead                • Have to pursue
and

LMX Theory
Three
Stage
Process
to
Developing
Posi5ve
LMX
Rela5ons
Three Stage Process
First Stage


• Tes5ng
(acceptable
limits)

• Impressions
Management

   (Performance
vs
Impression
driven)



• Ingra5a5on
(appear
suppor5ve,

   apprecia5ve
and
respecBul)



• Self
Promo5on
(effort
to
appear

   competent
and
dependable)
Three Stage Process
Second Stage
           • Leader and Follower became acquainted
               (stage 1)




           • Refining the roles


           • Perceived fairness of Leader   (crucial)
Three Stage Process
Third Stage
              • Only some relationships advance to
                this stage


              • Roles reach Maturity


              • Self-Interest turns into mutual
                commitment
Factors that Determine LMX Quality




1. Followers attribution



2. Leader-follower Perceptions of each other



3. Situational factors
Effective leader-follower feedback




                                     - a feeling of significance


                                     - a sense of belonging
Limitations to LMX Theory
   Measurement – attitudes and perceptions


   Instrumentation
    ◦ A questionnaire filled out by followers (LMX-7)
    ◦ LMSX – asses different aspects of the LMX theory
      Perceived competence or behaviour of the other person




    ◦ Further research on instrumentation is needed
Bias in LMX
Employee career implications




                             Followers win the liking of their leader
                              ◦ Higher performance rating


                             History of high performance rating
                             Promotion
Followership




Followership refers to the behaviour of followers, that results from the leader-follower
influence relationships.
Followership
new trend shifting away from early theories that solely focused on leaders, now there is more attention given to
followers and the leader-follower relationships


from an early age we are taught to be leaders, not followers, but effective leadership requires
both leaders and followers


societal views on followers have contributed to our limited knowledge of followership



followers are often ignored in explaining organizational success or failure




leadership is a correlation that is jointly produced by leaders and followers
Followership
  Leaders are just one part of the duality.

Effective leadership requires effective followership




                                                         no work unit or organization can be successful
                                                         without sufficient followers



                                                         good followers who give input that influence
                                                         managers are crucial to the success of any
                                                         organization




                                              Without followers there are no leaders.
5 Types of Followers
Alienated Follower:
                                    is someone who is low on involvement, yet high on critical thinking.


 individual who feels mislead and unappreciated by his of her own organization of work


 completely capable but unwilling to participate in developing solutions to problems


 happy dwelling on the negative and ignoring the positives as far as organizational life goes
5 Types of Followers
                           Conformist Follower:
        is someone who is high on involvement, yet low on critical thinking.




                                 Conformist’s are the
                                 people who always say
                                 yes in the organization
                                 but they carry out orders
                                 without considering the
                                 consequences first. A
                                 conformist will do
                                 anything to avoid conflict.
5 Types of Followers

Passive Follower:
                            is someone who is neither high on critical thinking nor involvement.




   looks to others to do all the thinking and does not get involved in any way

   also called the invisible follower

   need constant supervision

   never go beyond the job description




 They are often described as lazy, incompetent and unmotivated.
5 Types of Followers
                                            Effective Follower:
                               is someone who is high on critical thinking and involvement.




                                 not afraid to take risks

                                 do not shy away from conflict

                                 have the courage to initiate change

                                 put themselves as risk of conflict even with their
                                 leaders to serve the best interest of the organization

                                 act very well in self managed teams




Managers best asset because they are reliable and competent.
5 Types of Followers
Pragmatic Follower:
         exhibits a little of all four styles-depending on prevailed situation.




  tend to be “stuck in the middle” most of the time


  personality with both positive and negative sides




                        Positive : when the group is going through desperate times, the
                        pragmatic follower knows how to work the system to get things
                        done

                        Negative: this behaviour can be seen as adjusting to try and
                        maximize self-interest
Adventure Race
  In the water section, teams will have to
    work TOGETHER to paddle a kayak
              across the lake.




   This will help build on both communication and teamwork
techniques as they will be having to co-ordinate rowing patterns
               and constantly be working together.




                     Additionally, the team-mate at the back will be
                                       blindfolded.
Adventure Race
When teams reach the other side of the lake:
      groups of 2 combine to make groups of 4.
      members previously blindfolded,blindfold unblinded members

     teams will race up a mountain while
     strapped together (Every other member being blindfolded)




This is going to be a difficult challenge as
teammates will have to really rely on one another
in order to get to the desired CHECKPOINTS.
Adventure Race
                           There will be 3 checkpoints along the way:
Blindfolded members may remove their blindfolds only at a checkpoint, to assist the other
teammates in completing the puzzle.

                                     The puzzles will require patience and communication.
Teammates may decide to step up and become leader, this may cause tension within the group.


                                            Puzzles can become very frustrating and time
                                            consuming but will help build on their teamwork
                                            while under pressure.




                                                  The first team to reach the finish line wins !!
Final Ceremony




To finish off the retreat there will be an award
ceremony, recognizing the best teamwork,
communication and trust exhibited throughout the
entirety of the trip. 

Leadership slideshow

  • 1.
    Kinesemediaologists presents a Muskoka Leadership Retreat August 15th, 16th, 17th 2012
  • 2.
    Our Leaders Clayton Wong Leanne Phillips Paul Gill Brianne Hurley Tori Petersen Mia Giffen Darren Gonzales
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Dyadic The textbook translationof dyadic is: the individualized relationship between a leader and each follower in a work unit In turn, the dyadic theory: is an approach to leadership that attempts to explain why leaders vary their behaviour with different followers This theory argues that there is not one leadership quality that will get the same reaction from every follower in the work unit. Instead, there is separate relationships between a leader and followers that will motivate different reactions to the leader, whether it be positive or negative or everything in between
  • 5.
    Dyadic The dyadic approach has four stages of development: The Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory (VDL) The Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Team Building Systems and Network
  • 6.
    Workplace Web Throw ballof yarn around the class until all participating students have a ‘corner’. When you catch the yarn, identify your position within the school. Pick a position to be eliminated, designated student will let go of their corner. Positions on either side of released yarn must also let go of their corner. What is the result of this chain reaction?
  • 7.
    Vertical Dyadic LinkageTheory A leader creates a one-on-one relationship with followers Often leads to: - In groups - Out groups
  • 8.
    In Groups - Strong social ties - High mutual trust - Respect - Loyalty - Influence
  • 9.
    Out Groups - Fewor no social ties - Strictly work related - Task-centred
  • 10.
    Delegation - To assigntasks and responsibility to accomplish objectives Delegating - Giving employees new tasks
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Helium Stick Now it’s your turn to play !  Only the leader is allowed to speak and can administer one other person to talk at a time.  Line up in two rows which face each other.  Ask participants to point their index fingers and hold their arms out.  Lay the Helium Stick down on their fingers.  Get the group to adjust their finger heights until the Helium Stick is horizontal and everyone's index fingers are touching the stick.
  • 13.
    Pros for Manager -more time for high-priority task - lessen work load - increased communication with employee
  • 14.
    Pros for Employee trainsemployee improves self-esteem increase communication with manager opportunity to prove capability
  • 15.
    LMX Theory Leader -Member Exchange Theory The quality of exchange relationship between an employee and his/her superior.
  • 16.
    LMX Theory High Quality Exchange • Better social support • More recourses • More guidance for Career Development Low Quality Exchange • Less support • More formal supervision • Little or no involvement in decision making
  • 17.
    LMX Theory High QualityExchange Followers reciprocate with – Citizenship behaviours – Excellent performance
  • 18.
    LMX Theory Underlying Assumption • Leaders do not interact with everyone EQUALLY • Leads to different qualities of exchanges
  • 19.
    LMX Theory Strong Social Ties (In group) • Receive higher performance rating Weak Social Ties (Out group) • Provide higher positive feedback • Receive Lower (about the company) performance rating • Provide lesser positive feedback (about the company)
  • 20.
    LMX Theory Social Capital Follower(s) Leader(s) • are expected to • Have to pay attention work harder • be loyal • Remain responsive • have more admin to needs and feelings duties • Cannot resort to • This helps them get coercion ahead • Have to pursue
and

  • 21.
  • 22.
    Three Stage Process FirstStage • Tes5ng
(acceptable
limits) • Impressions
Management
 (Performance
vs
Impression
driven) • Ingra5a5on
(appear
suppor5ve,
 apprecia5ve
and
respecBul) • Self
Promo5on
(effort
to
appear
 competent
and
dependable)
  • 23.
    Three Stage Process SecondStage • Leader and Follower became acquainted (stage 1) • Refining the roles • Perceived fairness of Leader (crucial)
  • 24.
    Three Stage Process ThirdStage • Only some relationships advance to this stage • Roles reach Maturity • Self-Interest turns into mutual commitment
  • 25.
    Factors that DetermineLMX Quality 1. Followers attribution 2. Leader-follower Perceptions of each other 3. Situational factors
  • 26.
    Effective leader-follower feedback - a feeling of significance - a sense of belonging
  • 27.
    Limitations to LMXTheory  Measurement – attitudes and perceptions  Instrumentation ◦ A questionnaire filled out by followers (LMX-7) ◦ LMSX – asses different aspects of the LMX theory  Perceived competence or behaviour of the other person ◦ Further research on instrumentation is needed
  • 28.
    Bias in LMX Employeecareer implications  Followers win the liking of their leader ◦ Higher performance rating  History of high performance rating  Promotion
  • 30.
    Followership Followership refers tothe behaviour of followers, that results from the leader-follower influence relationships.
  • 31.
    Followership new trend shiftingaway from early theories that solely focused on leaders, now there is more attention given to followers and the leader-follower relationships from an early age we are taught to be leaders, not followers, but effective leadership requires both leaders and followers societal views on followers have contributed to our limited knowledge of followership followers are often ignored in explaining organizational success or failure leadership is a correlation that is jointly produced by leaders and followers
  • 32.
    Followership Leadersare just one part of the duality. Effective leadership requires effective followership no work unit or organization can be successful without sufficient followers good followers who give input that influence managers are crucial to the success of any organization Without followers there are no leaders.
  • 33.
    5 Types ofFollowers Alienated Follower: is someone who is low on involvement, yet high on critical thinking. individual who feels mislead and unappreciated by his of her own organization of work completely capable but unwilling to participate in developing solutions to problems happy dwelling on the negative and ignoring the positives as far as organizational life goes
  • 34.
    5 Types ofFollowers Conformist Follower: is someone who is high on involvement, yet low on critical thinking. Conformist’s are the people who always say yes in the organization but they carry out orders without considering the consequences first. A conformist will do anything to avoid conflict.
  • 35.
    5 Types ofFollowers Passive Follower: is someone who is neither high on critical thinking nor involvement. looks to others to do all the thinking and does not get involved in any way also called the invisible follower need constant supervision never go beyond the job description They are often described as lazy, incompetent and unmotivated.
  • 36.
    5 Types ofFollowers Effective Follower: is someone who is high on critical thinking and involvement. not afraid to take risks do not shy away from conflict have the courage to initiate change put themselves as risk of conflict even with their leaders to serve the best interest of the organization act very well in self managed teams Managers best asset because they are reliable and competent.
  • 37.
    5 Types ofFollowers Pragmatic Follower: exhibits a little of all four styles-depending on prevailed situation. tend to be “stuck in the middle” most of the time personality with both positive and negative sides Positive : when the group is going through desperate times, the pragmatic follower knows how to work the system to get things done Negative: this behaviour can be seen as adjusting to try and maximize self-interest
  • 38.
    Adventure Race In the water section, teams will have to work TOGETHER to paddle a kayak across the lake. This will help build on both communication and teamwork techniques as they will be having to co-ordinate rowing patterns and constantly be working together. Additionally, the team-mate at the back will be blindfolded.
  • 39.
    Adventure Race When teamsreach the other side of the lake: groups of 2 combine to make groups of 4. members previously blindfolded,blindfold unblinded members teams will race up a mountain while strapped together (Every other member being blindfolded) This is going to be a difficult challenge as teammates will have to really rely on one another in order to get to the desired CHECKPOINTS.
  • 40.
    Adventure Race There will be 3 checkpoints along the way: Blindfolded members may remove their blindfolds only at a checkpoint, to assist the other teammates in completing the puzzle. The puzzles will require patience and communication. Teammates may decide to step up and become leader, this may cause tension within the group. Puzzles can become very frustrating and time consuming but will help build on their teamwork while under pressure. The first team to reach the finish line wins !!
  • 41.
    Final Ceremony To finishoff the retreat there will be an award ceremony, recognizing the best teamwork, communication and trust exhibited throughout the entirety of the trip.