Kurt Vonnegut

Kurt Vonnegut
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. The 1960's was a remarkable decade summed up as a period of time when hundreds of average Americans gave new life to the
nation's democratic morals. It was an era of dramatic change, both socially and politically. As for novelists during this time, their novels tended to
explore change of human consciousness, with some taking an internal journey to consider the very nature of understanding and creative form.
American writer Kurt VonnegutJr. was well known for his understatedly novels regularly using postmodern techniques and elements of fantasy and
science fiction highlighting the horrors of twentieth century civilization. Much of his work is stamped by a substantially hopeless worldview that
embraces modern human philosophy....show more content...
portrays through his novel Slaughterhouse–Five, the tough times he had gone through in his life and how it affected him. The 1960's were a decade of
promise and heartbreak. With Vonnegut's curious mind, he set out to publish Slaughterhouse
–Five where some were able to understand the meaning of
the novel, while others were not. It was a period of time African Americans used protest marches to fight segregation, poverty and unemployment.
Vonnegut's ingenuity turned him into one of the greatest American novelists of his age.
Works Cited
"Digital History." Digital History. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Mar. 2017.
History.com Staff. "The 1960s." History.com. A&E Television Networks, 2010. Web. 19 Mar. 2017.
"Kurt Vonnegut." Biography.com. A&E Networks Television, 08 July 2014. Web. 19 Mar. 2017.
"Kurt Vonnegut Biography." Encyclopedia of World Biography. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Mar. 2017.
Morais, Betsy. "The Neverending Campaign to Ban 'Slaughterhouse Five'." The
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Characters In Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron
Characters in "Harrison Bergeron" are sedated, governed, and intimidated through television. The entire story takes place with George and Hazel sitting
in front of their TV. Vonnegut illustrates to the readers how television "freezes" the characters mind in his opening lines. "George and Hazel were
watching television. There were tears on Hazel's cheeks, but she'd forgotten for the moment what they were about" (Vonnegut 227). Hazel starts to
cry but the ballerinas dancing on the screen make her overlook why she is crying. The government also uses television as a medium of enforcing
regulations. When Harrison escapes jail the government announces an alert of his escape. They provided a picture of him covered up in his
"handicaps". His good looks were disfigured, ". . . required that he wear at all times a red rubber ball for a nose, keep his eyebrows shaved off, and
cover his white teeth with black caps at snaggle–tooth random," and his strength was dissipated with "scrap[s] of metal" hanging on top of him
(Vonnegut 228–229). The photo is a way to intimated viewers, giving...show more content...
At the beginning of the story George heard a buzzer while watching the ballerinas dance. While he was thinking about the idea of the dancers not being
handicapped, the sound of a milk bottle being shattered by a hammer reverberated in his ears. When George began to think about his son, twenty–one
guns firing interrupted is train of thought. The noise left George "white and trembling, and tears stood on the rims of his red eyes" (Vonnegut 227).
As Hazel and George talk about the laws of equality and how society use to be in "dark ages," sirens start to go off in his head. The sirens are a
symbol of the government becoming the police officers. As George realizes that Harrison has barged into the television studio, sounds of a car crash
resonated in his

Kurt Vonnegut's 2BR02B Essay
The story 2BR02B by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr is based in the future in 2081. Kurt Vonneguts stories take place in the future and are science fiction. In
the future the world has population control and only a certain amount of people could live on earth. At the beginning of the twenty first century,
there was not a lot of resources on earth to feed everyone. That is when population controlled came in, and the earth became a cleaner place to live
and not so packed (Kurt Vonnegut). There were no issues on earth. The world was perfect. No one had any illnesses or were going to die. There
was no crime, so no prisons needed. The only time someone would die, is if they would volunteer to die for someone else or they were just tired of
life. Sounds like a perfect world, well it might be, if that person does not want to have children and want immortality. The United States is a perfect
place to live. Everyone has immortality and can choose when they want to die. There was no crime, so murders did not take place anymore. This
helped to eliminate prisons. The only downside to the new population control...show more content...
She is greeted by the painter and builds a conversation with the painter. The painter is amused by the lady in purple, and decides to put her face onto
one of the faceless bodies (Kurt Vonnegut). The painter did not like what he was painting, but had no other choice. The first body he choices, the lady
is not pleased. The lady in the moral is carrying stalks to the burner. Leora the lady in purple, is just the hostess at the termination center. She is
assuming the lady carrying stalks, is the one terminating people and getting rid of the bodies (Kurt Vonnegut). She is not wanting to be the face of that
character in the moral carrying stalks to the burn pile. She is not the one killing people; she just makes them comfortable. The doctor then walks into
the waiting room and at this point in the story it is building to the rising

Research Paper On Kurt Vonnegut
Kurt Vonnegut, arguably the greatest American writer of the mid
–1900's, had experienced a variety of difficult events in his life that he incorporated
into his writing, which made his work very unique and personalized. Although he doesn't always explicitly explain his specific experiences in his
short stories, he portrays them through his impactful style of writing. In 1944, Vonnegut was enlisted into the army and sent to Dresden, Germany,
where he was later captured as a prisoner of war. While there, he watched the city become destroyed by an Allied bombing and was in utter disbelief.
He states, "The destruction of Dresden was my first experience with really fantastic waste... To burn down a habitable city and a beautiful one at that. I
was

Inequality In Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron
Complete equality has taken the world as we know it. Brilliant people are forced into median level thinking. Athletic people are required to restrict their
robust abilities. Gorgeous people are demanded to conceal their nature beauty. This is Kurt Vonnegut's future prediction of life in 2081. The
government and the, "Handicap General" have conformed every person into complete equals by restricting their natural abilities.
The short story of Harrison Bergeron described George and Hazel Bergeron, a happy couple living in the year 2081. George, was an above average
thinker and required by the government to wear an earpiece at all times that restricted his intelligent thinking. Hazel was an average woman who was
sometimes thought to be helplessly

Rhetorical Analysis Of Kurt Vonnegut's Speech
Hydrogen bombs are an exceedingly controversial subject; they enable humans to act as a pseudo god, giving us the ability to destroy all life in a
matter of hours. In May 1982 in St.John's cathedral Kurt Vonnegut gave a unique speech on hydrogen bombs explaining America needs them to protect
from fates worse than death. Instead of a traditional and delicate speech about the atrocities of hydrogen bombs Kurt breaks formal etiquette almost
immediately with jokes, humor and lightheartedness. By analyzing the diction and syntax Kurt uses in his speech a reader can see how Kurt
overcomes controversy, gains his audience's respect through ethos, and persuades them with logos and pathos. Often times when speaker's subjects are
surrounded by overwhelming...show more content...
Vonnegut uses an inductive format, since most of his audience has previously formed opinions on the subject he offers facts that his audience
agrees with and then offers a conclusion from those facts. This makes audience members who have formed contradictory opinions more open to
Vonnegut's stance on hydrogen bombs and makes it hard to refute his position since he gives the impression of trying to disprove his own points.
He gives the impression that each new stance has to be the exception to his cause. For example, he states, "Slavery would surely be a fate worse
than death," (line 133) but soon after comes to the conclusion "Could it be that slavery isn't a fate worse than death?" (line 213) by using such an
extreme fate and finding that it is still preferable to death he gives the reader the impression that death really is the worse fate. By giving solid
statistics, reasoning and emotion he is able to disprove the opposition's points before they ever come up. Using an inductive format also adds to
Kurt's ethos because since he reaches to a conclusion with his audience, it gives the impression that he has no ulterior motives and allows his audience
to view him as a selfless leader. This selflessness helps him gain his audience's trust and respect, which makes his speech considerably more

Kurt Vonnegut : Language And Literature
Written Task 1
Peyton Sparks
IB DP English A: Language and Literature HL
Mr. Hoffman
Rationale: In part one of my English course, we have studied multiple works of Kurt Vonnegut from his book Palm Sunday talking about ideas such as
language and its relation to censorship. I refer to the ideas used in Kurt's Palm Sunday to talk upon censorship in the written task.
An article seemed to be the most appropriate form of writing for this written task. It allowed me to stay relatively close to the problem addressed in
Vonnegut's work to speak more upon how censorship affects ideas in language by using a single problem instead of the largeridea. This had made it
easier for the reader to better understand the...show more content...
There was one night that was different though, my new novel detailing the events of a fictional reality where monsters and dark forces lurked around
every corner had just been approved and was soon to be published. It was one of the most exciting points in my life as it had detailed the beginning of
my professional career as an author.
A month had passed and my book had already won three awards, it seemed as though everyone was talking about my work and that I had blown up
almost instantly overnight. Even with all the success and how it was almost universally loved by all, my book had managed to become a central
topic by school boards across the world. Talk of censoring my work in schools soon had become common. A novel that I believed to be a masterpiece
was soon to never be seen in an academic scene even again.
My agent and I had thought of this as nothing more than insulting and childish behavior by the people who ran the school boards and controlled the
education of our future successors. To not let ideas, flow freely and allow them to circulate was nothing short of blasphemy to any reasonable author.
Two weeks passed and it was made clear that my book was to not be used in almost any academic scene in the US.
Through this event I had grown as both an author and a person, I spent the next two years create the second part of what

Kurt Vonnegut's Analysis
Statement of Goals When I was fourteen years old I bought a copy of "Slaughter–house Five" at a bookstore in Lexington Kentucky. I was in Kentucky
visiting my sister with my parents and we had stopped at the bookstore on our way back home. I was not a fast reader but I read the entire book on
the car trip. From then on I was hooked on Kurt Vonnegut. What I liked about him wasn't what I perceived to be his Sci–fi bent or his sarcastic tone,
although to be honest it didn't hurt. What I loved, and still love, about his books is his honesty. Of all the authors that I have read in my life, Vonnegut
has always seemed to me to be the most honest, the anger that his narrators feel in his books is his anger, and it's his frustration. Those books,
"Slaughter–house...show more content...
I attempted college a couple times in my twenties and it never worked out well. Now I am thirty–seven and although I have without a doubt struggled,
I am ready to start and complete an MFA program. I tend to thrive in the type of environments that this program offers. In the writing seminars that
I have been involved with at the University of Akron my grades have been good. One of the Professors that I thank for this is Dr. Lance Svehlah. I
have a number of anxiety related problems, I have a hard time talking to anyone whether it be a Professor or a student. I always felt comfortable in
his classes. In his classes I have always felt as though I knew what I was doing, that I was a good writer. That what I had to say in class was
important. Most importantly though that I was a good writer. I took him for two screenplay classes, I learned a great deal in these classes, and
important as that is. For me what is more important is that it gave me more confidence in what I wanted to do. This class and a Creative Non–fiction
class with Dr. Julie Drew, helped me realize that I could write, not just from the feedback from the professors but from the other people in the class as
well, who looked forward to reading the pieces that I wrote. This coming spring semester I will be taking Advanced Creative Non–Fiction from David
Giffels and greatly looking forward to that

What Is The Biography Of Mr. Kurt Vonnegut
The Biography of Mr. Kurt Vonnegut Mr. Kurt Vonnegut was an American author who is well known for several novels such as slaughterhouse
Five, Cat's Cradle, & God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater. Mr. Kurt Vonnegut was born in Indianapolis, Indiana, on November 11, 1922. He became a well
known novelist & essay writer in the 1960's. Some of his books became classics, such as, Cat's Cradle and Slaughterhouse – Five before the year 1980.
He became well known for his satirical style and science fiction in many of his writings. Vonnegut fell outside of his New York home. He suffered a
head injury and ultimately passed away on April 11 , 2007. He was recognized with a tribute across the world as one of the greatest American writers
of the 20th century.

Kurt Vonnegut Research Paper
Kurt Vonnegut Kurt Vonnegut jr. was an American author with a gloomy view of humanity, survived WWII on the front lines, was captured by
Germans, and the first 3 books he wrote were about a universe with no purpose. Even with all these downfalls there is no doubt that Kurt Vonnegut
was one of the greatest writers of his time. Personal life Kurt was born in Indianapolis, Indiana on November 11, 1922. His parents, Kurt Sr. and Edith
Sophia were 3rd generation Germans. Kurt jr. never got to experience his German roots, because of the anti–German attitudes in America. He grew up
with two siblings. His sister Alice and brother Bernard. They may seem familiar, as Kurt spoke of them often in his books. During the great depression
the Vonnegut...show more content...
These controversial opinions created a lot of problems throughout the U.S. Many public schools began banning the books in their libraries. A
school in North Dakota even felt so strongly against the book, they burned 36 copies of the book! Many christians were disgusted at two passages
from the book. One talked about how "Christianity seems to absolve its practitioners of terrible violence" (Gerow 1). The second part of passage
one was disagreed with, because of Vonnegut saying that "In the lynching of Jesus, lynching is actually okay, as long as you get the right
person"(Gerow 1). He also stated in the second passage that "Christians would be less violent and intolerant if Christianity were based on the
crucifixion of total schmuck and loser whom God redeemed at the last moment, then warned the world never to pick on outcasts" (Gerow 2). The
book wasn't just disliked by christians, other people had a strong negative view of the book for multiple reasons. A few were that the book had a few
very depressing lines such as when he said "life, in light of all the violence and madness, looks a meaningless at times'. The word Fuck also arose a lot
in the book. He also referred to a pornographic picture of a women. So finally in 1982 the supreme court voted 5–4 to ban "Slaughterhouse Five" in the
U.S. "Slaughterhouse Five" is still banned in many schools. Many people still believe that this book is unfit for high schoolers and some even believe
humanity! Others believe that we have become more mature and can handle more. THis was the main reason that the book was removed from the
countries ban list. Many people that have read "Slaughterhouse Five" have enjoyed the experience and the read.

Many authors have created science–fiction stories to warn people of the future, including Kurt Vonnegut and Stephen King. Vonnegut has written
several science fiction stories using dark humor and irony to warn people of possible dystopian futures, for example the short story, 2BR02B. In the
short story, Vonnegut describes a society where there are, "no prisons, no insane asylums, no cripples, no poverty, no wars, as well as conquering old
age and disease". Mr. Wehling, a soon to be a father of three, discovers the flaws in society because of his children's birth, Mr. Wehling has to find
volunteers that will sacrifice themselves for his children. On the other hand, Stephen King uses his style of suspense and horror to also warn the
audience...show more content...
In the short story, 2BR02B, Vonnegut alludes to the Holocaust to warn the audience of future tyranny that may occur. Vonnegut alludes to the
Holocaust because in the short story the Federal Bureau of Termination uses gas chambers, just as Nazi Germany had done, "'Who doesn't admire
him?' she said again. 'He was responsible for setting up the very first gas chamber in Chicago." Therefore, Vonnegut uses gas chambers as the method
to kill volunteers so that he can allude to Nazi Germany. Vonnegut does this so that he can not only communicate to the audience that killing the
volunteers is inhumane through the use of gas chambers. As well as suggesting that the people of this society are systematically guided towards death,
because of the depression that this dysfunctional circle of life creates. Therefore, Vonnegut is most successful in warning the audience of this future
dystopia by discussing the parallels that exist between the Nazi regime and the short story. Others may argue that that the people of this society are in
control of their own death. Which is suggested by the existence of the ability to volunteer to die, "He knew that he would never paint again. He let his
paintbrush fall to the drop–cloths below. And then he decided he had about enough of life in the Happy Garden of Life, too, and he came

The Life and Writings of Kurt Vonnegut Essay
Kurt Vonnegut is celebrated as one of the most successful novelist in the Post–Second World War period in the America. His literary works have had
varied impacts on American culture, including the use of the word "karass" amongst college students, the naming of the pop groups "Ice Nine Kills"
and "The Billy Pilgrims", and the frequent use of the term "So it goes" as written in Vonnegut's obituary on the New York Times (Farrell, p.ix). This
article examines the impacts of Vonnegut's on his literary work. It reviews the influences of his childhood experiences, his education, service in the
army, and employment at various settings on his work as a writer. His work caught the attention of a larger audience due his simplicity and humor
...show more content...
This could be explained by his earlier educational life as a science student at Cornell University and his interests in science fictions. Even though
Vonnegut was supportive of talking of the contributions of technology in the modern life, he was not quick to embrace technology in his literary
works. For instance, "he typed his essays and stories on a typewriter rather than a computer; he always relied on the U.S. Postal Service rather than
e–mail; and he warned repeatedly of the dangers of technological advancement," (Farrell, p.ix) His dissenting views on technological advancement
are illustrated in his literary works like Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Welcome to the Monkey House which depict how humans can
face serious problems associated with population explosion if all the infectious diseases are eradicated. In the Player Piano, he explains how human
labor will be taken by machines, creating a condition of extensive joblessness and helplessness in the modern world. Also, in Cat's Cradle, he talks of
the detriments of technological advances in military science, which could lead to the creation of deadly weapons such as "ice–nine" or neutron bomb
which destroyed Midland City, Ohio as depicted in the Deadeye Dick (Farrell, p.ix). In his works, Vonnegut also uses ill fated characters, individuals
who are pressed by conditions

Slaughterhouse-Five, by Kurt Vonnegut Essay
In the novel Slaughterhouse–Five by Kurt Vonnegut, a fictional character named Bill Pilgrim is used to depict the various themes about life and war.
Vonnegut went through some harsh times in Dresden, which ultimately led to him writing about the tragedies and emotional effects that come with
war. By experiencing the war first handed, Vonnegut is able to make a connection and relate to the traumatic events that the soldiers go through.
Through the use of Billy Pilgrim and the other characters, Vonnegut is able show the horrific affects the war can have on these men, not only during
the war but after as well. From the very beginning Vonnegut portrays a strong sense of anti–war feelings, which he makes most apparent through Billy
Pilgrim....show more content...
When he tells Billy that he needs to figure it out and snap out of it, Billy says, " You guys go on without me. I'm all right" (Vonnegut 47). This just
displays the hopelessness in Billy's life. The war has driven him to lose touch with himself and not value his own life. This makes it very easy for a
reader to feel empathy for Billy and get an idea of how war can really affect these men. Billy isn't the only character that Vonnegut uses to depict the
terrors of war. Throughout the novel, Vonnegut uses different characters to display his anti
–war feelings and show how many innocent victims end up
being casualties in a war. In order to display this effectively, he uses Edgar Derby as an example. Edgar Derby was a high school teacher that
willingly left his career to fight in the war. He was much older then most of then most of the men he was serving with including his son who was
also fighting in the war. Derby was also one of the soldiers that experienced the firebombing in Dresden with Billy. After the bombing occurred
Derby and the others were sifting through the damage and he picked up a teapot. Later on in the book Derby is arrested for stealing this simplistic
item and is sentenced to death by firing squad. This really bothered Billy because he saw an innocent man that he was friends with get killed for a
teapot. Some can argue that this is just an aspect of war that soldiers need

Kurt Vonnegut Essay
Kurt Vonnegut Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. is a contemporary American author whose works have been described by Richard Giannone as "comic masks
covering the tragic farce that is our contemporary life" (Draper, 3784). Vonnegut's life has had a number of significant influences on his works.
Influences from his personal philosophy, his life and experiences, and his family are evident elements in his works. Among his "comic masks" are three
novels: Cat's Cradle, The Sirens of Titan, and God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater. Throughout these novels, elements such as attitude,detail, narrative
technique, setting, and theme can be viewed with more understanding when related to certain aspects of his life. These correlations are best examined
in terms of each...show more content...
. . [an] indifferent universe, [and] regards human existence as unexplainable" (Bookshelf '94). Before the novel even starts, just below the dedication,
he declares, "Nothing in this book is true. 'Live by the foma [harmless untruths] that make you brave and kind and healthy and happy'" (Vonnegut,
Cradle). Vonnegut carries this concept all through the story, that the universe is meaningless and each person must exist for oneself. He even goes to
the extent of inventing a religion, Bokononism, with which humans attempt to make some sense of everything, while realizing that everything is
nonsensical.
Vonnegut's existential philosophy also takes the form of a religion in The Sirens of Titan. The Church of God the Utterly Indifferent is established,
on the principle that "puny man can do nothing at all to help or please God Almighty, and Luck is not the hand of God" (Vonnegut, Sirens, 180).
Toward the end of the story, two existential ideas are developed: first that human life is incomprehensible (in this case controlled by aliens from
another planet for a trivial purpose), and second that people must make a meaning for life on their own. When one character states, "The worst thing
that could possibly happen. . . would be to not be used for anything by anybody," Vonnegut is suggesting that a good meaning for life might simply be
to be

Kurt Vonnegut's Essay: What Is A Writing Style?
What is a writing style? Before my English 101 I had no idea, then my instructor presented the
Idea to our class, it got me engrossed. What I interpreted is a writing style is similar to you're personality. Or in the words of Kurt Vonnegut "your own
winning style must begin with ideas in
Your head." I have never taken into consideration what my writing style is. I always take the 3rd person
Approach making the person knows all. This way I can insert some silly commentary while who
Evers reading can get a bit of humor. The idea of the reader being the omniscient has always appealed to me, as they read that way the reader always
knows what's going to happen before the characters even have a clue. But in essays I like write as I'm talking to...show more content...
It's not only
Books but other forms of entertainment like movies, television, gaming, and puzzles. On the contrary other quotes I feel writers should take to heart
and love forever.
"Sound like you" that quote got me thinking about what writers are in general. When
Writing character or story driven novels you must write in the position of the character you're
Illustrating. Unless it is a certain style or an autobiography I feel it's more effects be to perceive as whatever character your portraying. "Say what you
mean" is one of the most critical aspects of
Any peace of literature. Saying what you mean can make or break a novel by making characters
More or less relatable or believable. One of the best uses of this example I read is World War Z
By Max Brooks. The perspective he took are of survivors of the post–apocalypse, it goes from a
Surgeon's point of view to a mechanic's and what they're stories of the apocalypse are. That's
What I feel what makes novels such a pleasure to read. I'm the end what makes a great book is not how ambitious the idea is or how unorthodox the
Novel might be. But the desire to make sure that your unique voice is heard that give a real name behind the

Essay On Kurt Vonnegut
One of the many advantages of written language is the ability to pass down important knowledge to younger generations for as long as the text exists.
Some of these writings were meant to pass along examples of how to live one's life and attempt to answer the unanswerable through moral or character
instruction. Fiction literature, however, is superior at delivering these lessons because fiction allows for far more creative freedom for the author to
craft their lesson. By its very nature as moral guidance, this type of writing often appears within a religious context. Khalil Gibran's 1923 masterpiece
The Prophet is a collection of twenty–six short sermons delivered by the prophet Almustafa to the people of Orphalese before his departure home.
The lack of a concrete storyline makes the entire novel a soapbox for Gibran to stand on and preach his wisdom. In fact, the absence of the Prophet's
name from anywhere in the book, except for the beginning, helps to blend the identities of Almustafa, the narrator, and Gibran. Blurred lines between
the three figures makes one believe that Gibran himself is standing among the people of Orphalese, or rather he is the god who is speaking through
Almustafa. The...show more content...
Vonnegut still uses religion as a major aspect, however he focuses on the absurdity of religion using Bokononism, a religion created and persecuted on
a whim by two men. The narrator even admits that his religion is only "the bittersweet lies of Bokonon" (Vonnegut 11). One of the over–arching
themes of the story, partly inspired by the narrators Bokononist ideology, is that no matter one's actions or character, the world is essentially
pre–determined and could end any minute. Obviously, Vonnegut isn't a true believer in Bokononism, rather he's a product of his time, which was filled
with uncertainty for the future because of the Cold

Kurt Vonnegut And Ray Bradbury Comparison
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. and Ray Bradbury, although both being authors of science fiction, have contrastive styles of writing. Bradbury's short story "The
Pedestrian," follows a character named Leonard Mead through a quiet town, but as one reads on there is a realization of why the town is so quiet;
government control. In Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron," there is an element of intrigue and excitement due to the individual characters and
their unique handicaps. These handicaps being there because of government control. Vonnegut and Bradbury are homologous, having a similar vision
of the future. That vision ultimately depicting a bureaucratic dystopia. In "Harrison Bergeron," Vonnegut's vision of a bureaucratic dystopia is one
where everyone

Harrison Bergeron, by Kurt Vonnegut Essay
Harrison Bergeron is a story written by Kurt Vonnegut. Vonnegut's story is a warning to the world about the quest of equality, which is spreading all
round in many nations with America on the lead. The story shows the reader how the equality issue can have negative impacts on people's
individuality, and the society. The story revolves around the protagonist,Harrison Bergeron who is an archetypical symbol that represents defiance, and
individuality. He is used to represent the people who will stand up, and protest against cruel laws imposed by the state on equality, and encourage others
to protest with him. Through the characterization of Harrison, George and Hazel, Vonnegut shows how the equality idea can go to the extreme. The
...show more content...
Conversely, Hazel's husband is handicapped with forty–seven pounds of birdshot strapped to his neck, and he is obedient to the government's
handicapped system. Vonnegut uses irony to demonstrate a dysfunctional Utopia in the society. In his story, Vonnegut uses irony to depict how easily a
government can control its citizens, by assaulting their senses and individuality. Harrison Bergeron is a valuable story that has underlying themes,
which are very relevant in our current society. The theme of equality can be seen throughout the book, and it is the principle that is enshrined in
America's constitution now, whereby they claim that all men are equal. Kurt Vonnegutdemonstrates the issue of equality in a Utopian society.
Vonnegut in his story, cautions Americans on the dangers of creating a truly equalitarian society, whereby citizens go to an extent of sacrificing their
freedom, and individuality to the state, to create a place where all people are equal. Vonnegut creates a society whereby, all people are made equal.
The beautiful are forced to wear hideous masks to disfigure their beauty, those considered intelligent are to wear radio calls, and ear splitting noises that
are supposed to impede their thinking, and the strong are forced to wear weights around their necks throughout the day. The author uses masks, and the
weights as symbols to symbolize

Who Is Kurt Vonnegut
Imagine creating something with the best intentions just to have someone else burn it up for reasons you weren't getting across. Most would feel
disrespected and decide to never share their ideas with society again, to prevent further humility. Kurt Vonnegut was a victim to this subjection, when
his books were burned in a furnace after Charles McCarthy, head of the school board at Drake High School, thought it was too corrupt for the
education agenda subjected to student's. Taking this into consideration, Vonnegut responded to this attack by writing a letter containing uses of
pathos to denounce McCarthy actions towards his books. Everyone has a set of various ethics that can define a person to be very real. Throughout
Vonnegut's letter he states expresses, " I am very real." signifying that Vonnegut has a real life and feeling like any other person. He expresses his
anger and sadness that Drake has committed such disrespectful actions upon his reputation. This damaged his figure as a writer and his status as a
provider for educational material. He explains how he didn't even try to to make profit off the insolent act towards him, instead he claims that he and
his colleagues have done nothing to do abuse this opportunity to make profit ( ). By stating that his feeling are true and taking the time to explain why
McCarthy's actions...show more content...
After this incident occurring, Vonnegut's insults McCarthy's actions by comparing them to the american dream. Similarly insulting his personal being
the way McCarthy insulted Vonnegut by destroying his creativity. This shows how angry vonnegut really felt over the situation and that he meant
business, this persuade McCarthy to think that he is at fault. Moreover bringing up the "American value" to make McCarthy feel sorry for
disrespecting Vonnegut and american citizen pride. This guilt damages McCarthy's judgement of himself and for the sake of

Kurt Vonnegut

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Kurt Vonnegut