This document discusses Indian juvenile justice laws and principles. It defines a "child in conflict with law" as any person under 18 who has allegedly or actually committed an offense. Those between 16-18 who commit serious ("heinous") offenses may be tried as adults. The document examines how age of the offense and age at apprehension are treated under the law. It also discusses principles like presumption of innocence, dignity, and best interests of the child that guide the juvenile justice system. Statistics are presented showing trends in juveniles apprehended from 2013-2014 with more older juveniles (16-18) apprehended.
It is basically a way to present information related to juvenile act , delinquency , reasons , solutions to it and act and latest statistics related to juvenile crimes and case and statements of famous personalities on this serious issue.It is presented by by students of Kanoria College BBA third year students.
And plz if u like it plz comment and clip the slides.
recently the law has regonised the victim of crime as earlier only law was focused on rights of accused. now the victims of crime has been given much required reliefs and ample powers are granted to Legal services Authority to grant appropriate reliefs to victims.
It is basically a way to present information related to juvenile act , delinquency , reasons , solutions to it and act and latest statistics related to juvenile crimes and case and statements of famous personalities on this serious issue.It is presented by by students of Kanoria College BBA third year students.
And plz if u like it plz comment and clip the slides.
recently the law has regonised the victim of crime as earlier only law was focused on rights of accused. now the victims of crime has been given much required reliefs and ample powers are granted to Legal services Authority to grant appropriate reliefs to victims.
Growing Up on Death Row: The Death Penalty and Juvenile Offenders in Iran ABA IHRC
Scores of youths in Iran are languishing on death row for crimes committed under the age of 18, said Amnesty International in a damning new report published today. The report debunks recent attempts by Iran’s authorities to whitewash their continuing violations of children’s rights and deflect criticism of their appalling record as one of the world’s last executioners of juvenile offenders.
Growing up on death row: The death penalty and juvenile offenders in Iran reveals that Iran has continued to consign juvenile offenders to the gallows, while trumpeting as major advances, piecemeal reforms that fail to abolish the death penalty against juvenile offenders.
“This report sheds light on Iran’s shameful disregard for the rights of children. Iran is one of the few countries that continues to execute juvenile offenders in blatant violation of the absolute legal prohibition on the use of the death penalty against people under the age of 18 years at the time of the crime,” said Said Boumedouha, Deputy Director of Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa Programme.
Juvenile Justice System in Comparison to Criminal Justice System in Indiaijtsrd
Children and adults are treated differently as far as the legal perspective is concerned. Law considers the offence committed by the child as a delinquent act rather than a crime. Courts have established a different procedure for trial in case of a child. The child and adult not only differ in criminal proceedings but on other grounds also. They do not have the same constitutional rights as adults. The administration of justice system has a different perspective in case of an offence committed by a child. If an offence is committed by an adult, it is perceived as a crime and he or she is taken under legal consideration for the same. On the other hand, if an offence is committed by a child, the court observes the delinquency of the act. However, there is an exception in some case where the child can be treated as an adult. The main objective of the juvenile justice system is to make sure that the child is rehabilitated so that he or she does not repeat the same crime in future. In an adult justice system, the main objective is to threaten the accused by way of punishment so that he or she should not commit such heinous offences in future. Naincy Goyal"Juvenile Justice System in Comparison to Criminal Justice System in India" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-2 | Issue-5 , August 2018, URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd17025.pdf http://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/other/17025/juvenile-justice-system-in-comparison-to-criminal-justice-system-in-india/naincy-goyal
In our society juvenile offenders are increasing day by day and juvenile delinquency crime is one of the burning
issues in all over the world. So the purpose of the article is to reduce juvenile delinquency from the society. The article explains
who is juvenile. The study focus on reasons behind juvenile offender. The paper argues that family problem, social
environment, mantle torture, educational dissatisfaction and lack of legal provisions are also factors that constitute such
offender. The paper reveals the historical development about the definition, legal provisions and Acts on juvenile offender. The
article describes what step should be taken to improve their situation in the society.
Child In Conflict With Law Under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act 2...Free Law - by De Jure
Children are one of the most valued assets of the future generation who are required to be protected. Recently, there is an unprecedented increase in the juvenile crime rate. This is due to many changes such as behavioral change, lack of education, subjugation, upbringing environment, harassment, lack of parental care, sexual indulgence, violent treatment, poverty, and the advent of modern lifestyle. Shrewd criminals indulge children in criminal activities especially, the ones between 6-12 years because at this point minds are innocent and can be easily manipulated as well as lure them to the world of crime. However, children below 7 years of age cannot be held criminally responsible for an offence because of a lack of understandability and are known as “Doli Incapax Maxim”.
Mediation and conflict resolution: Training CourseRitu Gautam
Course of content on mediation and conflict resolution by Dr. Ritu Gautam, Mediation Training Expert, Family dispute resolution clinic Coordinator, Legal professional
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
3. Definition
As per, Juvenile Justice (care and protection of
children ) Act, 2015 ‘child in conflict with’ means, a
child who alleged or found to have committed an
offence and who has not completed the eighteen
year of age on the date of commission of such
offence provided if, any child in conflict with Law under
the age group of 16–18 who alleged of found to have
committed any Heinous Offences, will be treated as an
adults [s. 2(33), R/W 2(13), R/W 15, R/W 18(3)]
NOIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
5. JJ Act 1986
• Juvenile + Delinquent
• A boy under 18 year and girl under 16 year of age
JJ (CPC)A Act
2006
• Juvenile + in conflict with Law
• Any Child under the age of 18 year
JJ (CPC) Act,
2015
• Child + in conflict in Law
• Any child under the age of 18 year( in heinous offences 16-18
years)
NOIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
6. Child Labor (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986.
Section 2 (ii), “Child” means a person who has not
completed the age of 14 years.
Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929.
Section 2 (a), “Child” means a person who, if a male,
has not completed twenty one years of age, and if a
female, has not completed eighteen years of age.
Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.
Section 2 (a), “Child” means a person who has not
completed the age of sixteen years
NOIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
8. Condition No.1- What if, a child committed a heinous
Crime when he was 16 year 10 months and
apprehended after eight year…….
Condition No.2- What if, a child committed a crime when
he was 17 yr. 11 months and at the time of
pronouncement of punishment he was 22 yr. few
months…….
Condition No.3- what if, child is a habitual offender and at
the time of first attempt he was 15 yr old and at the
time of last attempt he was 17 yr which date need to be
consider?
NOIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
10. India has world's largest youth population: UN report
A total of 60,539 juveniles were apprehended and
produced before various juveniles boards during 2014.
The overall increase in juveniles apprehended at the
national level was 10.9% during 2014 as compared to
2013.
The decrease in the number of juveniles apprehended
was 15.9% in 12-16 years age group (from 13,346 in
2013 to 11,220 in 2014) and increase by 25.3% in 16-18
years age group (from 28,830 in 2013 to 36,138 in
2014)
NOIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
12. Principal of Presumption of innocence
Principal of dignity and worth
Principal of best interest
Principal of family responsibility
Principal of safety
Principal of non-stigmatising
Principal of non-waiver of rights
NOIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
13. Principal of equality and non-discrimination
Principal of right to privacy and confidentiality
Principal of institutionalization as a measure of
last resort
Principal of repatriation and restoration
Principal of fresh start
Principal of diversion
Principal of natural justice
NOIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
Juvenile crime is one of the nation's serious problems. In recent years, this concern has grown with the dramatic rise in juvenile violence. we all are aware of 16 dec. Nirbhaya gang rape case, controversy raged after this case,that as the juvenile was the most heinous and active among the all, Public has demanded that he should be tried as an adult . Such a demand lead Subramanian Swamy (BJP leader) file an PIL “that such a person should be treated as an adult” but it was turn down by the supreme court as the existing law doesn’t permit this.
In furtherance, Women and Child Development minister Maneka Gandhi has raise the voice to lowering the age of a juvenile in heinous offences from 18 to 16 yr
Who should be treated as a j is the most actively debated topics globally……..Child in the transition to attain adulthood…neither can be consider as a child nor as an adult. It is very critical to deal with them. Response to his action committed in this period can result in either in a responsible citizen or as an harden criminal.
Medically…..youngster is going through such phase of transition which brings hormonal changes
There is nothing like good or bad ……these are the condition , what matters is that you are prepare for that or not.
TheHeinous offences u/s 2(33) of JJ…..2015, Offences for which the minimum punishment under the IPC or any other law, is 7 Yr. and more
Serious offences defineu/s 2(54) p2(54) of JJ…..2015, Offences for which the punishment under the IPC or any other law, is 3 to 7 Yr.
Petty offences u/s 2(45) of JJ…..2015, Offences for which the punishment under the IPC or any other law, is up to 3 yr.
for special treatment of juvenile offender started towards the end of eighteen c Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Inter-Country Adoption, 1993 entury Prior to this, juvenile offender were treated exactly as adults
The Act came into force from 15 January 2016
juveniles in conflict with Law in the age group of 16–18 involved in Heinous Offences, can be tried as adults
The bill introduced concepts from the
4
How we reach up to this day when government has to make a a separate law for the juvenile. Historical back ground of juvenile
It was william coxson who in 1484 ,used the term ‘delinquent” to describe a person found guilty of customary offence. generally speaking the term refers to a large variety of disapproved behavior of child and adolescent, which society does not approve.
In 2006 by amending juvenile justice (care and protection) Act,2000 the word Delinquent was replaced with the word “In conflict with Law”. The principal of natural justice says every one is innocent in the eye of law until unless they prove guilty.
Now the word Juvenile again came in consideration
is also replaced with the word “ child in conflict with Law” by following the principal of Non- istegmisation
Definition of child under various laws are provided as
Under child labor Act, child means a person who has not completed the age of 14 year. In the cases of marriage male-21 and female-18. and in the case of immoral trafficking Child means 16 year of age
There are two basic conflicts
1- regarding the age of Commencement of crime
2- regarding the age of Apprehension after crime
in the case of Arnit Das Vs. State of Bihar,2000 supreme court held that the , So far as the present context is concerned we are clear in our mind that the crucial date of determining the question whether a person is a juvenile is the date when he is brought before the competent authority”
This crucial issue was once again considered by a five Judge Bench in case of Pratap Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and others, 2005 it was held that The reckoning date for the determination of the age of the juvenile is the date of the offence and not the date when he is produced before the authority or in the court”
This view was again upheld in case of
Satbir Singh V. State of Haryana, 2005 AIR (SC) 3546;
Jameel V. State of Maharashtra, 2007 AIR (SC) 971;
Ranjeet Singh V. State of Haryana, 2008(3) SCC (Cri) 784.
That After Pratap Singh's case, the legislature through the amendment in 2006 removed any doubt by setting out in Section 2 (l) definition of juvenile in conflict with law to mean a juvenile who is alleged to have committed an offence and has not completed 18 years of age as on the date of commission of such offence. Explanation to Section 20 has also been added which further clarifies that in all pending cases including trial, revision, appeal or any other criminal proceedings in respect of a juvenile in conflict with law, in any Court, the determination of juvenility of such a juvenile shall be in terms of clause (1) of section 2, even if the juvenile ceases to be so on or before the date of commencement of this Act and the provisions of this Act shall apply as if the said provisions had been in force, for all purposes and at all material times when the alleged offence was committed.
a8 yr few months…….
2- SA child committed a heinous Crime when he was 15 year 10 months and apprehended after two year…….
3- A child, who is a habitual offender and fourth attempt was when he was 19 year 2 month He will be tried under JJB or Criminal court?
a Common Law philosophy, evolve by Eyre v. Shaftesbury (1772) case, under which the sovereign is charged with the role of acting as parent to the country. This Latin term roughly translates to the concept of "state as parent," or "parent of the country.“
Rajesh V. State Of U.P. on 9 September, 2014
pendra Pradhan vs State Of Orissa on 28 April, 2015
In Ajay Kumar v State of M.P., (2010) 15 SCC 83, this Court observed as follows
Pratap Singh v. Jharkhand
Izaz ahmad v. state of Madhya predesh,………..hold inquiry weathere the person is a juvenile or not
IPC 82 & 83…..
Ulla mahapatra, 1950
kRISHNA………….sufficient maturity
Test of qualified maturity
1- the nature of the act done
2- subsequent conduct of the offender
3- demeanour and appearance of the offender in the court
Rajesh V. State Of U.P. on 9 September, 2014
pendra Pradhan vs State Of Orissa on 28 April, 2015
In Ajay Kumar v State of M.P., (2010) 15 SCC 83, this Court observed as follows
Pratap Singh v. Jharkhand
Izaz ahmad v. state of Madhya predesh,………..hold inquiry weathere the person is a juvenile or not
IPC 82 & 83…..
Ulla mahapatra, 1950
kRISHNA………….sufficient maturity
Test of qualified maturity
1- the nature of the act done
2- subsequent conduct of the offender
3- demeanour and appearance of the offender in the court