SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 53
TEACHING ABOUT ISRAEL
AND PALESTINE
HOTEL PALOMAR, 117 S 17TH ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
OCTOBER 25-26, 2014
A HISTORY INSTITUTE FOR TEACHERS
Justin Finkelstein
October 26, 2014
Presented for the Foreign Policy
Research Institute (FPRI) History
Institute for Teachers on “Teaching
about Israel and Palestine”
Palestinian and Israeli Public
Opinion on Solutions to the Arab-
Israeli Conflict
Overview
1) The Joint Israeli Palestinian Poll
2) Palestinians
 a) Polls that support the findings of Joint Poll
 b) Polls that complicate the findings of the Joint Poll
 c) Palestinians: Conclusions
3) Israelis
 a) Polls that support the findings of the Joint Poll
 b) Polls that complicate the findings of the Joint Poll
 c) Israelis: Conclusions
4) Conclusions: Israeli and Palestinian Public
Opinion
What is meant by “Israeli and
Palestinian Public Opinion”?
• Representative samples (approximately 500 or
more) of both Israelis and Palestinians
• Who are Israelis?
 About 8.1 to 8.9 million Jews, Muslims, Druze,
Christians and others who are Israeli citizens
 75% Jewish, 20% Muslim, 5% other
• Who are Palestinians?
 About 4 to 4.5 million Muslims, Christians and others
who live in the West Bank and Gaza Strip
 97% Muslim, 3% Christian
1) The Joint Israeli Palestinian
Poll
 Conducted jointly by the Harry S. Truman
Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace
at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the
Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey
Research (PSR) in Ramallah
 Comprehensive poll conducted each
December/January since 2003
 Other joint polls also periodically conducted, and
other polls sometimes conducted independently
by PSR
 Presents six main elements of a two-state
solution to the conflict in the spirit of the Clinton
Parameters and Geneva Initiative
#1: Borders
 The entirety of the West Bank and Gaza Strip
would make up Palestine, with exception of 3% of
the West Bank, with proportional land swaps to
make up for this
#2: Refugees
 Solution based on UN Resolutions 194 and 242.
Palestinian refugees to be given 5 options for
permanent residency:
a) Palestinian state
b) Areas transferred from Israel to Palestine
c) Current country of residence (subject to that
country’s discretion)
d) A third country (subject to that country’s
discretion)
e) Israel (subject to Israel’s discretion, but Israel
“will consider the average number of refugees
admitted to third countries”)
 All refugees would receive compensation
#3: Jerusalem
 East Jerusalem capital of Palestine, with Arab
neighborhoods falling under Palestinian
sovereignty and Jewish neighborhoods under
Israeli sovereignty
 All of Old City and Haram al-Sharif (Temple
Mount) to Palestine except for Jewish Quarter
and Wailing Wall plaza; those areas and West
Jerusalem will be capital of Israel
#4: Demilitarized Palestinian
State
 Palestine would have no army, but a strong
security force and multinational forces to ensure
its safety and security
 Both Israel and Palestine would be committed to
ending all violence against each other
#5: Security Arrangements
 Palestine to have sovereignty over its land, water
and airspace
 Israel would have right to use Palestinian
airspace for training purposes
 Israel would maintain two security stations in the
West Bank for 15 years
 Multinational force would monitor borders and
implementation of agreement by both sides
#6: End of Conflict
 Upon full implementation of agreement:
1. Conflict will be declared over by both sides
2. Mutual recognition of each state as the
homeland of its respective peoples
Review: The 6 Parts of the
Joint Polls’ Peace Plan
1) Borders: The entirety of the West Bank and Gaza Strip would make up Palestine,
with exception of 3% of the West Bank with proportional land swaps to make up for
this
2) Refugees: Solution based on UN Resolutions 194 and 242. Palestinian refugees to
be given 5 options for permanent residency: a) Palestinian state b) areas
transferred from Israel to Palestine c) current country of residence d) a third country
e) Israel.
All refugees would receive compensation.
3) Jerusalem: East Jerusalem capital of Palestine, with Arab neighborhoods falling
under Palestinian sovereignty and Jewish neighborhoods under Israeli sovereignty.
All of Old City and Haram al-Sharif to Palestine except for Jewish Quarter and
Wailing Wall. That and West Jerusalem will be capital of Israel.
4) Demilitarized Palestinian State: Palestine would have no army, but a strong
security force and multinational forces to ensure its safety and security. Both Israel
and Palestine would be committed to ending all violence against one another.
5) Security Arrangements: Palestine to have sovereignty over its land, water and
airspace; Israel would have right to use airspace for training purposes; Israel would
maintain two security stations in the West Bank for 15 years. Multinational force
would monitor borders and implementation of agreement by both sides
Joint Poll Results: 2003-2013
Dec
. ‘03
De
c.
‘04
Dec.
‘05
Dec.
‘06
Dec.
‘07
De
c.
‘08
Dec.
‘09
Dec.
‘10
De
c.
‘11
De
c.
‘12
Dec.
‘13
AVG
Overall
packag
e
I
S
R
47% 64% 64% 52% 53% 52% 46% 52% 58% 56% 54% 54.36%
P
A
L
39% 54% 46% 48% 47% 41% 38% 40% 50% 43% 46% 44.73%
Summary Table: 2003-2013 - Breakdown
Dec
03
Dec
04
Dec
05
Dec
06
Dec
07
Dec
08
Aug
09
Dec
10
Dec
11
Dec
12
Dec
13
1) Borders and
Territorial
Exchange
ISR 47% 55% 53% 44% 46% 46% 47% 49% 51% 46% 44%
PAL 57% 63% 55% 61% 56% 54% 49% 49% 63% 53% 52%
2) Refugees
ISR 35% 44% 43% 38% 44% 40% 36% 36% 42% 42% 39%
PAL 25% 46% 40% 41% 39% 40% 37% 41% 45% 41% 46%
3) Jerusalem
ISR 41% 39% 38% 38% 36% 40% 34% 38% 38% 38% 37%
PAL 46% 44% 33% 39% 36% 36% 31% 36% 40% 29% 32%
4)
Demilitarized
State
ISR 61% 68% 69% 62% 61% 64% 56% 62% 67% 70% 60%
PAL 36% 27% 20% 28% 23% 27% 24% 24% 32% 28% 28%
5) Security
Arrangements
ISR 50% 61% 62% 51% 53% 56% 49% 52% 63% 59% 52%
PAL 23% 53% 43% 42% 51% 35% 34% 38% 50% 46% 52%
6) End of
Conflict
ISR 66% 76% 80% 68% 66% 67% 68% 68% 70% 68% 66%
PAL 42% 69% 64% 62% 66% 55% 55% 58% 63% 59% 63%
Latest Polls from PSR and
The Hebrew University
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Palestinians (Sept. 25-27, 2014) Israelis (June 8-15, 2014)
% Support
for Two-
State…
Arab Peace Initiative, 2002
 “Arab recognition of and normalization of relations
with Israel after it ends its occupation of Arab
territories occupied in 1967 (2013: with minor swaps)
and after the establishment of a Palestinian state.
 Israeli retreat from all territories occupied in 1967
including Gaza, the West Bank, Jerusalem and the
Golan Heights, and the establishment of a Palestinian
state.
 Refugee problem will be resolved through
negotiations in a just and agreed upon manner and in
accordance with UN resolution 194.
 In return, all Arab states will recognize Israel and its
right to secure borders, will sign peace treaties with
Israel and establish normal diplomatic relations.”
API: Support over past several years
Israelis: 20%-35%
Joint poll conducted June 8-15,
2014: 29% support, 64%
oppose
Palestinians: 47%-65%
Joint poll conducted June 5-7,
2014: 50% support, 46%
oppose
Joint Poll: What about a One-state
Solution, in Which “Arabs and Jews
Enjoy Equality?”
 Palestinians: Approximately 25% to 30% support
 Latest poll of Palestinians from September 2014 found
26.7% support and 71% oppose a one-state solution
 Israelis: Approximately 25% to 32% support
 Latest poll of Israelis from June 2013 poll surveyed
32% in support of one-state solution
What Do Other Polls Say?
2) Palestinians:
Polls that Corroborate the Findings of
PSR/Joint Polls
Palestinian-run Jerusalem Media and Communications
Center (JMCC) poll from April 2014 (has not conducted
poll since):
Some believe that a two-state formula is the favored solution for the Arab-Israeli
conflict, while others believe that historic Palestine cannot be divided and thus
the favored solution is a bi-national state on all of Palestine where Palestinians
and Israelis enjoy equal representation and rights. Which of these solutions do
you prefer?
Total
(1200)
West
Bank
(750)
Gaza
(450)
Two-state solution: a Palestinian and an Israeli state 48.7% 45.2% 54.4%
Binational state on all historic Palestine 18.8% 23.9% 10.2%
Palestinian State* 15.3% 13.9% 17.8%
Islamic State* 1.0% 1.2% 0.7%
Others 1.6% 0.8% 2.9%
No Solution 11.8% 11.9% 11.8%
I don’t know/no answer 2.8% 3.1% 2.2%
and Development (AWRAD) poll, May 2014
(most recent that deals with two-state
solution)
West Bank Gaza Total
Do you support the principle of a two-state solution with a Palestinian state living side-
by-side in peace with Israel?
Support
57.5% 52.0% 55.4%
Oppose
38.8% 46.9% 41.8%
Don’t know
3.7% 1.1% 2.8%
Al-Najah University Poll,
Sept. 11-13, 2014
 Do you support the two-state solution provided
that a Palestinian state is created to live side by
side with Israel?
Total West Bank Gaza Strip
I strongly
support
14.6% 11.7% 19.6%
I support 41.8% 46.0% 34.6%
I reject 23.9% 27.1% 18.4%
I strongly reject 14.9% 13.4% 17.6%
No opinion/I do
not know
4.7% 1.7% 9.8%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Same Al-Najah Poll
Sept. 11-13, 2014:
 Do you support or reject a one-state solution in
which Palestinians and Israelis enjoy equal
rights?
Total West Bank Gaza Strip
I strongly
support
7.5% 4.3% 13.0%
I support 18.8% 18.1% 20.0%
I reject 42.1% 50.2% 28.0%
I strongly reject 26.2% 25.5% 27.4%
No opinion/I do
not know
5.4% 1.9% 11.6%
Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Poll Commissioned by the Brookings
Institution November 2013
 Presented almost the same peace agreement as in Joint Poll,
with notable exception that “Palestinians would recognize
Israel as a state of the Jewish people and of all its citizens.”
 Conducted by Palestinian Center for Public Opinion (PCPO)
 Only 30% positively viewed one state scenario in which
Israelis and Palestinians live in equality
Palestinians:
Polls that Complicate the Findings of
PSR
Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP)
poll, June 15-17, 2014
Please state your view about the main
Palestinian national goal for the next
five years
Total West
Bank
Gaza Strip
The goal should be to work toward
reclaiming all of historic Palestine from the
river to the sea
60.3% 55.4% 68.4%
The goal should be to end the occupation
of the West Bank and Gaza to achieve a
two-state solution
27.3% 30.6% 21.8%
The goal should be to work for a one-state
solution in all of the land: a state in which
Arabs and Jews will have equal rights in
one country, from the river to the sea
10.1% 11.2% 8.2%
No opinion/don’t know 2.3% 2.8% 1.6%
The Israel Project (TIP)/Greenberg
Quinlan Rosner/PCPO poll, 2011
Palestinian State over the Entire
Land:
But Majority also Supported Obama’s
Framework for a Two-State Solution
 “U.S. President Barack Obama recently announced principles that
should be a foundation for any peace negotiations between Israel
and the Palestinians. He said the border between Israel and
Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually-agreed
swaps of land to take account of realities on the ground so both
sides can achieve a secure and just peace. Would you favor or
oppose a two-state solution with these borders?”
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Support (5% Strongly
Support)
Oppose (5% Strongly
Oppose)
August 2010 AWRAD Poll
PSR Post-Gaza War Poll, Aug. 26-30
 In elections, Ismail Haniyeh would defeat
Mahmoud Abbas, 61% to 32%
 46% would vote for Hamas, 31% for Fatah
 “72% favors the transfer of Hamas’ armed
approach to the West Bank”
Voting: Abbas vs. Haniyeh
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
June
5-7,
2008
Aug.
28-30,
2008
Dec.
3-5,
2008
March
5-7,
2009
May
21-23,
2009
Aug.
13-15,
2009
Dec.
10-12,
2009
March
4-6,
2010
June
10-13,
2010
Sept.
30-Oct.
2,…
Dec.
16-18,
2010
March
17-19,
2011
June
16-18,
2011
Sept.
15-17,
2011
Dec.
15-17,
2011
March
15-17,
2012
June
21-23,
2012
Sept.
13-15,
2012
Dec.
13-15,
2012
March
28-30,
2013
June
13-15,
2013
Sept.
19-21,
2013
Dec.
19-22,
2013
March
20-22,
2014
June
5-7,
2014
Aug.
26-30,
2014
Sept.
25-27,
2014
Abbas
Haniyeh
Voting: Fatah vs. Hamas
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
June
5-7,
2008
Aug.
28-30,
2008
Dec.
3-5,
2008
March
5-7,
2009
May
21-23,
2009
Aug.
13-15
2009
Dec.
10-12,
2009
March
4-6,
2010
June
10-13,
2010
Sept.
30-Oct.
2,
2010
Dec.
16-18,
2010
March
17-19,
2011
June
16-18,
2011
Sept.
15-17,
2011
Dec.
15-17,
2011
March
15-17,
2012
June
21-23,
2012
Sept.
13-15,
2012
Dec.
13-15,
2012
March
28-30,
2013
June
13-15,
2013
Sept.
19-21,
2013
Dec.
19-22,
2013
March
20-22,
2014
June
5-7,
2014
Aug.
26-30,
2014
Sept.
25-27,
2014
Fatah
Palestinian Public Opinion: Conclusions
 Theory: There is a difference between what one
wants and what one is willing to accept
 2 types of questions:
 What do you want?
 Do you agree with/support…?
 Palestinians want one Palestinian state over the
entire land and would like to work toward that
goal, yet they are also agreeable to a two-state
solution – even one that would leave Israel with a
strong Jewish majority
3) Israelis:
Polls that Corroborate the Findings of
The Hebrew University
Washington D.C.-based S. Daniel Abraham
Center for Middle East Peace:
Polls of Israelis commissioned 2003 to 2012
Poll Commissioned by the
Brookings Institution, November 2013
 Midgam Project (Israeli firm) conducted
 Only 21% positively viewed one state scenario
in which Israelis and Palestinians live in
equality
Tel Aviv-based Institute for National Security
Studies (INSS) poll, January 2014
 Found about half of Israeli public in favor of a
two-state solution similar to (slightly less far-
reaching) the Clinton Parameters/Geneva
Initiative:
Support
51%
Oppose
24%
Indecisive
25%
INSS: Israeli Support for Establishment
of Palestinian State in the Context of a
Permanent Peace Agreement
Geneva Initiative-commissioned Poll
Conducted by New Wave Research, mid-September
2014
 Poll presented the Geneva Initiative two-state
peace plan
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Support
(38%)+highly
support (8%)
Oppose
(20%)+highly
oppose
(13%)
Still debating
the matter
(14%)
Do not have
a clear
opinion (6%)
Israeli Dialog Poll
June 9-11, 2014
 “If the prime minister were to reach an agreement that included
the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel, would
you support a peace agreement?”
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Support - 60% Oppose - 32% Don't know - 8%
Israelis:
Polls That Complicate the Findings of
The Hebrew University
Israeli Dialog Poll
June 9-11, 2014
 “If the [peace] agreement meant that most of the
settlers would be annexed to Israel, Jerusalem would
be divided, the refugees would not return to Israel and
there would be strict security arrangements, would
you support such an agreement?”
Support 35%
Oppose 58%
Don’t know 7%
Same Poll, Again:
 Of the following possibilities, which solution is best
for Israel in the long run?
1) One state between the Jordan
River and the Sea in which all
citizens have equal rights,
including the right to vote for the
Knesset (Israeli parliament)
10%
2) Don’t know 14%
3) One state between the Jordan
River and the sea, but with
limited rights for Palestinians
23%
4) Continuation of the present
situation
25%
5) A peace agreement that
includes a partition of the land, a
partition of Jerusalem, removal
of settlements, and no return of
refugees to Israel
28%
Israel Democracy Institute (IDI) Poll
July 2013
 If Israel and the Palestinians reach an understanding and a permanent
peace agreement that includes security arrangements for Israel, a
demilitarized Palestinian state, international guarantees, and
declaration of the end of the conflict by the Palestinians, in return for
this peace agreement, would you support or not support each of the
following?
Proposal % Support
1) Withdrawal to the 1967 lines with territorial swaps 38.4%
2) Transfer of Arab neighborhoods of Jerusalem to the
Palestinian Authority and a special arrangement for the
holy places
43.9%
3) An evacuation of settlements except for Ariel, Maaleh
Adumim, and the settlement blocs
44.3%
4) Israeli recognition in principle of the right of return,
permitting the return of a small number of Palestinian
refugees and financial compensation for others
28.4%
Poll conducted by Geocartography
Institute (Israel), January 2013
 Do you support or oppose the concept that the
establishment of two states is the solution to the
conflict with the Palestinians?
Support: 40%
Oppose: 45%
No reply: 14%
The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA) poll
October 12-14, 2014
Israelis: Conclusions
 Similar to Palestinians: What do you want vs. what do
you accept
 Consistency
 Prime Minister Netanyahu’s support is crucial
 Results can change based on what may seem like small
differences
 Example: Joint Poll included a joint Israeli and
Palestinian declaration that the conflict is over and
demilitarized Palestinian state, while Dialog poll did not
 JCPA poll did not include as part of peace agreement
with Palestinians, and did not include 1967 lines with
land swaps
 IDI poll: Overall support for entire package vs. support
4) Israeli and Palestinian Public Opinion:
Conclusion
 What Israelis and Palestinians want is far apart
 But an area of consensus can be found
 A two-state solution must include specific
components to achieve this consensus on both
sides
 Among all people living between the Jordan River
and the Mediterranean Sea, there is more
acceptance of some sort of a two-state solution
than there is for any other solution

More Related Content

Similar to justin_finkelstein1.pptx Palestine israel conflict

Israel palestine conflict primer 101 final
Israel palestine conflict primer 101 finalIsrael palestine conflict primer 101 final
Israel palestine conflict primer 101 finalPyramid Connections
 
World Religion - EndTime Magazine - May/June 2015
World Religion - EndTime Magazine - May/June 2015World Religion - EndTime Magazine - May/June 2015
World Religion - EndTime Magazine - May/June 2015miscott57
 
Israel Shows Restraint
Israel Shows RestraintIsrael Shows Restraint
Israel Shows RestraintSpeedy Media
 
Octopus and Midget in the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process: Who Determines W...
Octopus and Midget in the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process: Who Determines W...Octopus and Midget in the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process: Who Determines W...
Octopus and Midget in the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process: Who Determines W...AJSSMTJournal
 
Basic Statistics
Basic StatisticsBasic Statistics
Basic Statisticsbotnut
 
Basic Statistics
Basic StatisticsBasic Statistics
Basic Statisticsbotnut
 
Lets Talk Updated 7 05
Lets Talk Updated 7 05Lets Talk Updated 7 05
Lets Talk Updated 7 05guest56526d
 
Shaul Arieli - Trump and Annexation - June 2020
Shaul Arieli - Trump and Annexation - June 2020Shaul Arieli - Trump and Annexation - June 2020
Shaul Arieli - Trump and Annexation - June 2020YachadUK
 
Making Hard Choices An Analysis of Settlement Choices and Willingness to Retu...
Making Hard Choices An Analysis of Settlement Choices and Willingness to Retu...Making Hard Choices An Analysis of Settlement Choices and Willingness to Retu...
Making Hard Choices An Analysis of Settlement Choices and Willingness to Retu...Global Risk Forum GRFDavos
 
Evaluation of the legacy of the NPT with focus on the Middle East
Evaluation of the legacy of the NPT with focus on the Middle  East  Evaluation of the legacy of the NPT with focus on the Middle  East
Evaluation of the legacy of the NPT with focus on the Middle East Abdelhamied El-Rafie
 
Evaluation Of The Legacy Of The N P T With Focus On The Middle East
Evaluation Of The Legacy Of The  N P T With Focus On The  Middle   EastEvaluation Of The Legacy Of The  N P T With Focus On The  Middle   East
Evaluation Of The Legacy Of The N P T With Focus On The Middle EastAbdelhamied El-Rafie
 

Similar to justin_finkelstein1.pptx Palestine israel conflict (20)

Israel palestine conflict primer 101 final
Israel palestine conflict primer 101 finalIsrael palestine conflict primer 101 final
Israel palestine conflict primer 101 final
 
World Religion - EndTime Magazine - May/June 2015
World Religion - EndTime Magazine - May/June 2015World Religion - EndTime Magazine - May/June 2015
World Religion - EndTime Magazine - May/June 2015
 
Palestinian position
Palestinian positionPalestinian position
Palestinian position
 
“The Palestinians of East Jerusalem: What Do They Really Want?
“The Palestinians of East Jerusalem: What Do They Really Want?“The Palestinians of East Jerusalem: What Do They Really Want?
“The Palestinians of East Jerusalem: What Do They Really Want?
 
Palistinian liberation organisation
Palistinian liberation organisation Palistinian liberation organisation
Palistinian liberation organisation
 
Israel Shows Restraint
Israel Shows RestraintIsrael Shows Restraint
Israel Shows Restraint
 
Hebron-AContestedSpace
Hebron-AContestedSpaceHebron-AContestedSpace
Hebron-AContestedSpace
 
Octopus and Midget in the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process: Who Determines W...
Octopus and Midget in the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process: Who Determines W...Octopus and Midget in the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process: Who Determines W...
Octopus and Midget in the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process: Who Determines W...
 
Basic Statistics
Basic StatisticsBasic Statistics
Basic Statistics
 
Basic Statistics
Basic StatisticsBasic Statistics
Basic Statistics
 
Years of no decision chapter 8
Years of no decision  chapter 8Years of no decision  chapter 8
Years of no decision chapter 8
 
Lets Talk Updated 7 05
Lets Talk Updated 7 05Lets Talk Updated 7 05
Lets Talk Updated 7 05
 
Lets Talk
Lets Talk Lets Talk
Lets Talk
 
12
1212
12
 
Onestatepres
OnestatepresOnestatepres
Onestatepres
 
Shaul Arieli - Trump and Annexation - June 2020
Shaul Arieli - Trump and Annexation - June 2020Shaul Arieli - Trump and Annexation - June 2020
Shaul Arieli - Trump and Annexation - June 2020
 
Making Hard Choices An Analysis of Settlement Choices and Willingness to Retu...
Making Hard Choices An Analysis of Settlement Choices and Willingness to Retu...Making Hard Choices An Analysis of Settlement Choices and Willingness to Retu...
Making Hard Choices An Analysis of Settlement Choices and Willingness to Retu...
 
Evaluation of the legacy of the NPT with focus on the Middle East
Evaluation of the legacy of the NPT with focus on the Middle  East  Evaluation of the legacy of the NPT with focus on the Middle  East
Evaluation of the legacy of the NPT with focus on the Middle East
 
Evaluation Of The Legacy Of The N P T With Focus On The Middle East
Evaluation Of The Legacy Of The  N P T With Focus On The  Middle   EastEvaluation Of The Legacy Of The  N P T With Focus On The  Middle   East
Evaluation Of The Legacy Of The N P T With Focus On The Middle East
 
Post disengagement
Post disengagementPost disengagement
Post disengagement
 

Recently uploaded

Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfagholdier
 
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxRole Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxNikitaBankoti2
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural ResourcesEnergy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural ResourcesShubhangi Sonawane
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17Celine George
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptRamjanShidvankar
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxDenish Jangid
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxAreebaZafar22
 
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIFood Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIShubhangi Sonawane
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...EduSkills OECD
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsMebane Rash
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfAdmir Softic
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Shubhangi Sonawane
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxVishalSingh1417
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxRole Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural ResourcesEnergy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIFood Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 

justin_finkelstein1.pptx Palestine israel conflict

  • 1. TEACHING ABOUT ISRAEL AND PALESTINE HOTEL PALOMAR, 117 S 17TH ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 OCTOBER 25-26, 2014 A HISTORY INSTITUTE FOR TEACHERS
  • 2. Justin Finkelstein October 26, 2014 Presented for the Foreign Policy Research Institute (FPRI) History Institute for Teachers on “Teaching about Israel and Palestine” Palestinian and Israeli Public Opinion on Solutions to the Arab- Israeli Conflict
  • 3. Overview 1) The Joint Israeli Palestinian Poll 2) Palestinians  a) Polls that support the findings of Joint Poll  b) Polls that complicate the findings of the Joint Poll  c) Palestinians: Conclusions 3) Israelis  a) Polls that support the findings of the Joint Poll  b) Polls that complicate the findings of the Joint Poll  c) Israelis: Conclusions 4) Conclusions: Israeli and Palestinian Public Opinion
  • 4. What is meant by “Israeli and Palestinian Public Opinion”? • Representative samples (approximately 500 or more) of both Israelis and Palestinians • Who are Israelis?  About 8.1 to 8.9 million Jews, Muslims, Druze, Christians and others who are Israeli citizens  75% Jewish, 20% Muslim, 5% other • Who are Palestinians?  About 4 to 4.5 million Muslims, Christians and others who live in the West Bank and Gaza Strip  97% Muslim, 3% Christian
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7. 1) The Joint Israeli Palestinian Poll  Conducted jointly by the Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR) in Ramallah  Comprehensive poll conducted each December/January since 2003  Other joint polls also periodically conducted, and other polls sometimes conducted independently by PSR  Presents six main elements of a two-state solution to the conflict in the spirit of the Clinton Parameters and Geneva Initiative
  • 8. #1: Borders  The entirety of the West Bank and Gaza Strip would make up Palestine, with exception of 3% of the West Bank, with proportional land swaps to make up for this
  • 9.
  • 10. #2: Refugees  Solution based on UN Resolutions 194 and 242. Palestinian refugees to be given 5 options for permanent residency: a) Palestinian state b) Areas transferred from Israel to Palestine c) Current country of residence (subject to that country’s discretion) d) A third country (subject to that country’s discretion) e) Israel (subject to Israel’s discretion, but Israel “will consider the average number of refugees admitted to third countries”)  All refugees would receive compensation
  • 11. #3: Jerusalem  East Jerusalem capital of Palestine, with Arab neighborhoods falling under Palestinian sovereignty and Jewish neighborhoods under Israeli sovereignty  All of Old City and Haram al-Sharif (Temple Mount) to Palestine except for Jewish Quarter and Wailing Wall plaza; those areas and West Jerusalem will be capital of Israel
  • 12. #4: Demilitarized Palestinian State  Palestine would have no army, but a strong security force and multinational forces to ensure its safety and security  Both Israel and Palestine would be committed to ending all violence against each other
  • 13. #5: Security Arrangements  Palestine to have sovereignty over its land, water and airspace  Israel would have right to use Palestinian airspace for training purposes  Israel would maintain two security stations in the West Bank for 15 years  Multinational force would monitor borders and implementation of agreement by both sides
  • 14. #6: End of Conflict  Upon full implementation of agreement: 1. Conflict will be declared over by both sides 2. Mutual recognition of each state as the homeland of its respective peoples
  • 15. Review: The 6 Parts of the Joint Polls’ Peace Plan 1) Borders: The entirety of the West Bank and Gaza Strip would make up Palestine, with exception of 3% of the West Bank with proportional land swaps to make up for this 2) Refugees: Solution based on UN Resolutions 194 and 242. Palestinian refugees to be given 5 options for permanent residency: a) Palestinian state b) areas transferred from Israel to Palestine c) current country of residence d) a third country e) Israel. All refugees would receive compensation. 3) Jerusalem: East Jerusalem capital of Palestine, with Arab neighborhoods falling under Palestinian sovereignty and Jewish neighborhoods under Israeli sovereignty. All of Old City and Haram al-Sharif to Palestine except for Jewish Quarter and Wailing Wall. That and West Jerusalem will be capital of Israel. 4) Demilitarized Palestinian State: Palestine would have no army, but a strong security force and multinational forces to ensure its safety and security. Both Israel and Palestine would be committed to ending all violence against one another. 5) Security Arrangements: Palestine to have sovereignty over its land, water and airspace; Israel would have right to use airspace for training purposes; Israel would maintain two security stations in the West Bank for 15 years. Multinational force would monitor borders and implementation of agreement by both sides
  • 16. Joint Poll Results: 2003-2013 Dec . ‘03 De c. ‘04 Dec. ‘05 Dec. ‘06 Dec. ‘07 De c. ‘08 Dec. ‘09 Dec. ‘10 De c. ‘11 De c. ‘12 Dec. ‘13 AVG Overall packag e I S R 47% 64% 64% 52% 53% 52% 46% 52% 58% 56% 54% 54.36% P A L 39% 54% 46% 48% 47% 41% 38% 40% 50% 43% 46% 44.73%
  • 17. Summary Table: 2003-2013 - Breakdown Dec 03 Dec 04 Dec 05 Dec 06 Dec 07 Dec 08 Aug 09 Dec 10 Dec 11 Dec 12 Dec 13 1) Borders and Territorial Exchange ISR 47% 55% 53% 44% 46% 46% 47% 49% 51% 46% 44% PAL 57% 63% 55% 61% 56% 54% 49% 49% 63% 53% 52% 2) Refugees ISR 35% 44% 43% 38% 44% 40% 36% 36% 42% 42% 39% PAL 25% 46% 40% 41% 39% 40% 37% 41% 45% 41% 46% 3) Jerusalem ISR 41% 39% 38% 38% 36% 40% 34% 38% 38% 38% 37% PAL 46% 44% 33% 39% 36% 36% 31% 36% 40% 29% 32% 4) Demilitarized State ISR 61% 68% 69% 62% 61% 64% 56% 62% 67% 70% 60% PAL 36% 27% 20% 28% 23% 27% 24% 24% 32% 28% 28% 5) Security Arrangements ISR 50% 61% 62% 51% 53% 56% 49% 52% 63% 59% 52% PAL 23% 53% 43% 42% 51% 35% 34% 38% 50% 46% 52% 6) End of Conflict ISR 66% 76% 80% 68% 66% 67% 68% 68% 70% 68% 66% PAL 42% 69% 64% 62% 66% 55% 55% 58% 63% 59% 63%
  • 18. Latest Polls from PSR and The Hebrew University 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Palestinians (Sept. 25-27, 2014) Israelis (June 8-15, 2014) % Support for Two- State…
  • 19. Arab Peace Initiative, 2002  “Arab recognition of and normalization of relations with Israel after it ends its occupation of Arab territories occupied in 1967 (2013: with minor swaps) and after the establishment of a Palestinian state.  Israeli retreat from all territories occupied in 1967 including Gaza, the West Bank, Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, and the establishment of a Palestinian state.  Refugee problem will be resolved through negotiations in a just and agreed upon manner and in accordance with UN resolution 194.  In return, all Arab states will recognize Israel and its right to secure borders, will sign peace treaties with Israel and establish normal diplomatic relations.”
  • 20. API: Support over past several years Israelis: 20%-35% Joint poll conducted June 8-15, 2014: 29% support, 64% oppose Palestinians: 47%-65% Joint poll conducted June 5-7, 2014: 50% support, 46% oppose
  • 21. Joint Poll: What about a One-state Solution, in Which “Arabs and Jews Enjoy Equality?”  Palestinians: Approximately 25% to 30% support  Latest poll of Palestinians from September 2014 found 26.7% support and 71% oppose a one-state solution  Israelis: Approximately 25% to 32% support  Latest poll of Israelis from June 2013 poll surveyed 32% in support of one-state solution
  • 22. What Do Other Polls Say?
  • 23. 2) Palestinians: Polls that Corroborate the Findings of PSR/Joint Polls
  • 24. Palestinian-run Jerusalem Media and Communications Center (JMCC) poll from April 2014 (has not conducted poll since): Some believe that a two-state formula is the favored solution for the Arab-Israeli conflict, while others believe that historic Palestine cannot be divided and thus the favored solution is a bi-national state on all of Palestine where Palestinians and Israelis enjoy equal representation and rights. Which of these solutions do you prefer? Total (1200) West Bank (750) Gaza (450) Two-state solution: a Palestinian and an Israeli state 48.7% 45.2% 54.4% Binational state on all historic Palestine 18.8% 23.9% 10.2% Palestinian State* 15.3% 13.9% 17.8% Islamic State* 1.0% 1.2% 0.7% Others 1.6% 0.8% 2.9% No Solution 11.8% 11.9% 11.8% I don’t know/no answer 2.8% 3.1% 2.2%
  • 25. and Development (AWRAD) poll, May 2014 (most recent that deals with two-state solution) West Bank Gaza Total Do you support the principle of a two-state solution with a Palestinian state living side- by-side in peace with Israel? Support 57.5% 52.0% 55.4% Oppose 38.8% 46.9% 41.8% Don’t know 3.7% 1.1% 2.8%
  • 26. Al-Najah University Poll, Sept. 11-13, 2014  Do you support the two-state solution provided that a Palestinian state is created to live side by side with Israel? Total West Bank Gaza Strip I strongly support 14.6% 11.7% 19.6% I support 41.8% 46.0% 34.6% I reject 23.9% 27.1% 18.4% I strongly reject 14.9% 13.4% 17.6% No opinion/I do not know 4.7% 1.7% 9.8% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
  • 27. Same Al-Najah Poll Sept. 11-13, 2014:  Do you support or reject a one-state solution in which Palestinians and Israelis enjoy equal rights? Total West Bank Gaza Strip I strongly support 7.5% 4.3% 13.0% I support 18.8% 18.1% 20.0% I reject 42.1% 50.2% 28.0% I strongly reject 26.2% 25.5% 27.4% No opinion/I do not know 5.4% 1.9% 11.6% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
  • 28. Poll Commissioned by the Brookings Institution November 2013  Presented almost the same peace agreement as in Joint Poll, with notable exception that “Palestinians would recognize Israel as a state of the Jewish people and of all its citizens.”  Conducted by Palestinian Center for Public Opinion (PCPO)  Only 30% positively viewed one state scenario in which Israelis and Palestinians live in equality
  • 29. Palestinians: Polls that Complicate the Findings of PSR
  • 30. Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) poll, June 15-17, 2014 Please state your view about the main Palestinian national goal for the next five years Total West Bank Gaza Strip The goal should be to work toward reclaiming all of historic Palestine from the river to the sea 60.3% 55.4% 68.4% The goal should be to end the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza to achieve a two-state solution 27.3% 30.6% 21.8% The goal should be to work for a one-state solution in all of the land: a state in which Arabs and Jews will have equal rights in one country, from the river to the sea 10.1% 11.2% 8.2% No opinion/don’t know 2.3% 2.8% 1.6%
  • 31. The Israel Project (TIP)/Greenberg Quinlan Rosner/PCPO poll, 2011
  • 32. Palestinian State over the Entire Land:
  • 33. But Majority also Supported Obama’s Framework for a Two-State Solution  “U.S. President Barack Obama recently announced principles that should be a foundation for any peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. He said the border between Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually-agreed swaps of land to take account of realities on the ground so both sides can achieve a secure and just peace. Would you favor or oppose a two-state solution with these borders?” 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Support (5% Strongly Support) Oppose (5% Strongly Oppose)
  • 35. PSR Post-Gaza War Poll, Aug. 26-30  In elections, Ismail Haniyeh would defeat Mahmoud Abbas, 61% to 32%  46% would vote for Hamas, 31% for Fatah  “72% favors the transfer of Hamas’ armed approach to the West Bank”
  • 36. Voting: Abbas vs. Haniyeh 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 June 5-7, 2008 Aug. 28-30, 2008 Dec. 3-5, 2008 March 5-7, 2009 May 21-23, 2009 Aug. 13-15, 2009 Dec. 10-12, 2009 March 4-6, 2010 June 10-13, 2010 Sept. 30-Oct. 2,… Dec. 16-18, 2010 March 17-19, 2011 June 16-18, 2011 Sept. 15-17, 2011 Dec. 15-17, 2011 March 15-17, 2012 June 21-23, 2012 Sept. 13-15, 2012 Dec. 13-15, 2012 March 28-30, 2013 June 13-15, 2013 Sept. 19-21, 2013 Dec. 19-22, 2013 March 20-22, 2014 June 5-7, 2014 Aug. 26-30, 2014 Sept. 25-27, 2014 Abbas Haniyeh
  • 37. Voting: Fatah vs. Hamas 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 June 5-7, 2008 Aug. 28-30, 2008 Dec. 3-5, 2008 March 5-7, 2009 May 21-23, 2009 Aug. 13-15 2009 Dec. 10-12, 2009 March 4-6, 2010 June 10-13, 2010 Sept. 30-Oct. 2, 2010 Dec. 16-18, 2010 March 17-19, 2011 June 16-18, 2011 Sept. 15-17, 2011 Dec. 15-17, 2011 March 15-17, 2012 June 21-23, 2012 Sept. 13-15, 2012 Dec. 13-15, 2012 March 28-30, 2013 June 13-15, 2013 Sept. 19-21, 2013 Dec. 19-22, 2013 March 20-22, 2014 June 5-7, 2014 Aug. 26-30, 2014 Sept. 25-27, 2014 Fatah
  • 38. Palestinian Public Opinion: Conclusions  Theory: There is a difference between what one wants and what one is willing to accept  2 types of questions:  What do you want?  Do you agree with/support…?  Palestinians want one Palestinian state over the entire land and would like to work toward that goal, yet they are also agreeable to a two-state solution – even one that would leave Israel with a strong Jewish majority
  • 39. 3) Israelis: Polls that Corroborate the Findings of The Hebrew University
  • 40. Washington D.C.-based S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace: Polls of Israelis commissioned 2003 to 2012
  • 41. Poll Commissioned by the Brookings Institution, November 2013  Midgam Project (Israeli firm) conducted  Only 21% positively viewed one state scenario in which Israelis and Palestinians live in equality
  • 42. Tel Aviv-based Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) poll, January 2014  Found about half of Israeli public in favor of a two-state solution similar to (slightly less far- reaching) the Clinton Parameters/Geneva Initiative: Support 51% Oppose 24% Indecisive 25%
  • 43. INSS: Israeli Support for Establishment of Palestinian State in the Context of a Permanent Peace Agreement
  • 44. Geneva Initiative-commissioned Poll Conducted by New Wave Research, mid-September 2014  Poll presented the Geneva Initiative two-state peace plan 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Support (38%)+highly support (8%) Oppose (20%)+highly oppose (13%) Still debating the matter (14%) Do not have a clear opinion (6%)
  • 45. Israeli Dialog Poll June 9-11, 2014  “If the prime minister were to reach an agreement that included the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel, would you support a peace agreement?” 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Support - 60% Oppose - 32% Don't know - 8%
  • 46. Israelis: Polls That Complicate the Findings of The Hebrew University
  • 47. Israeli Dialog Poll June 9-11, 2014  “If the [peace] agreement meant that most of the settlers would be annexed to Israel, Jerusalem would be divided, the refugees would not return to Israel and there would be strict security arrangements, would you support such an agreement?” Support 35% Oppose 58% Don’t know 7%
  • 48. Same Poll, Again:  Of the following possibilities, which solution is best for Israel in the long run? 1) One state between the Jordan River and the Sea in which all citizens have equal rights, including the right to vote for the Knesset (Israeli parliament) 10% 2) Don’t know 14% 3) One state between the Jordan River and the sea, but with limited rights for Palestinians 23% 4) Continuation of the present situation 25% 5) A peace agreement that includes a partition of the land, a partition of Jerusalem, removal of settlements, and no return of refugees to Israel 28%
  • 49. Israel Democracy Institute (IDI) Poll July 2013  If Israel and the Palestinians reach an understanding and a permanent peace agreement that includes security arrangements for Israel, a demilitarized Palestinian state, international guarantees, and declaration of the end of the conflict by the Palestinians, in return for this peace agreement, would you support or not support each of the following? Proposal % Support 1) Withdrawal to the 1967 lines with territorial swaps 38.4% 2) Transfer of Arab neighborhoods of Jerusalem to the Palestinian Authority and a special arrangement for the holy places 43.9% 3) An evacuation of settlements except for Ariel, Maaleh Adumim, and the settlement blocs 44.3% 4) Israeli recognition in principle of the right of return, permitting the return of a small number of Palestinian refugees and financial compensation for others 28.4%
  • 50. Poll conducted by Geocartography Institute (Israel), January 2013  Do you support or oppose the concept that the establishment of two states is the solution to the conflict with the Palestinians? Support: 40% Oppose: 45% No reply: 14%
  • 51. The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA) poll October 12-14, 2014
  • 52. Israelis: Conclusions  Similar to Palestinians: What do you want vs. what do you accept  Consistency  Prime Minister Netanyahu’s support is crucial  Results can change based on what may seem like small differences  Example: Joint Poll included a joint Israeli and Palestinian declaration that the conflict is over and demilitarized Palestinian state, while Dialog poll did not  JCPA poll did not include as part of peace agreement with Palestinians, and did not include 1967 lines with land swaps  IDI poll: Overall support for entire package vs. support
  • 53. 4) Israeli and Palestinian Public Opinion: Conclusion  What Israelis and Palestinians want is far apart  But an area of consensus can be found  A two-state solution must include specific components to achieve this consensus on both sides  Among all people living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, there is more acceptance of some sort of a two-state solution than there is for any other solution

Editor's Notes

  1. According to CIA World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/
  2. Green denotes what is among the most popular points of the plan among both Israelis and Palestinians and red denotes what is least popular
  3. http://www.pcpsr.org/survey/polls/2014/p52ejoint.html
  4. http://www.pcpsr.org/survey/polls/2014/p52ejoint.html
  5. http://www.pcpsr.org/survey/polls/2013/p48ejoint.html
  6. http://jmcc.org/documents/81_April_2014_english_with_Charts.pdf
  7. Mostly consistent with findings of AWRAD since polling started in 2007 (never below 45% support for a two-state solution)
  8. http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/uploads/Documents/other/PalestinianPollingReport_June2014.pdf
  9. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/events/2013/12/06%20public%20opinion%20israel%20palestine/israel%20palestine%20opinion%20poll%202.pdf
  10. http://d26e8pvoto2x3r.cloudfront.net/uploadImages/systemFiles/Bagno-Moldavsky%20and%20Ben%20Meir_adkan17_1ENG5.pdf
  11. http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/israel-peace-conference/1.601996