What is Justice? Essay examples Essay Justice Justice Is To Blame By Charles Tilly Essay on Justice The Justice System Essay Essay about Justice

1. What is Justice? Essay examples
What is Justice?
Justice, for the great Greek philosophers of ancient times and even for the great philosophers of
today, is a controversial issue and has been up for immense discussion and review. The nature of
justice and injustice has been stated and reviewed many times, however, the origin of the reviewing
comes from the Greek Thrasymachus, who's thesis is later reviewed and modified by Glaucon.
Glaucon's position is revised yet again by Thomas Hobbes, who's version is now the accepted form
of explanation for the origin of justice and injustice. Although there are various examples for the
origin and nature of justice and injustice provided by these three men, I will provide supporting
examples for the conclusion that the thesis...show more content...
He concludes that justice is high–minded innocence as injustice is good counsel, stating the way of
the unjust is better. (338d–44c) Glaucon follows with his thesis stating that justice is good solely as
means but not in itself. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove to him how it can be good both as
means and in itself. Glaucon says that no one is willingly just, but rather compelled to act justly
caused by nature, while they try to better themselves, ultimately saying that the life of the unjust
is also better. Glaucon's argument contains three parts; justice being good in itself, purely as
means, the third dealing with its goodness for both reasons. Glaucon says that justice is a mean
between doing what is best; which is doing injustice without paying the penalty and suffering
injustice without being able to avenge oneself. Therefore, justice is not cared for because it is
good, however, it is honored due to a want of vigor in doing injustice. He makes a second point on
why people are unwillingly just, saying that the only reason the just are just is because they follow
the rules and are afraid of being caught. However, if such a person were invisible and free to do
whatever he or she wished, then they too would be unjust. Why would a person incapable of being
caught by authorities be just? This is the question that Glaucon
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Essay Justice
Justice
Every action or decision we make is either justifiable or unjustifiable.
Justice is usually decided by society or the "norm." The "norm" changes from
one society to another. However, there are always laws that can be broken, consequences that must
follow, and punishment that must be imparted. Justice can be seen in two different ways, social and
criminal. Justice is in the eye of the beholder because we all have different attitudes about right and
wrong.
Criminal justice is a term that refers to the area of social laws which a group of people deem
valuable in order for the day–to–day mechanics of society to function. When these laws are broken,
the...show more content...
No matter what verdict would have been handed–down, someone, somewhere would have been
unsatisfied. If Shively were sentenced to be executed, then his family and friends would have had to
fight for justice until the day he died. As the verdict of "not guilty" arrived,
Paterson's family, many police officers, and friends of the family cried for justice. Yet, justice had
been served.
Equal and satisfying justice has always been a problem. On May 30, 1939 a group of Texas
Rangers decided to ambush and murder two people they wanted to destroy. They shot seventy five
bullets into a man named Clyde and fifty four deadly bullets into a young lady named Bonnie. Of
course, this is the famous story of the outlaw couple, Bonnie and Clyde. This action branched
across the guaranteed right to due process. Another incident of the criminal justice's injustices
occurred when the ATF decided to arrest David Koresh and his followers. We know how this story
ends. The ATF was the reason that many people died and was probably the cause of the Oklahoma
City bombing.
A more recent incident is one that was taped by a helicopter. A group of illegal Mexican
immigrants were trying to get to the land of freedom and justice for all. After arriving they were
hunted down by the border patrol in
California. After the border patrol caught them they beat them up. This group of Mexicans were beat
up for attempting to
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Justice Is To Blame By Charles Tilly
Justice is there so people can live together peacefully, and if not, soon it could lead to a not so
bright future for justified societies. Justice is in place so nobody is left out, everyone truly gets to
have their voices heard. Togetherness is often clouded by judgment, and it takes a certain potentiality
for us to examine why togetherness is so important and the pathways for it to be justified as,
amiably. With so many different types ofjustice it could be said that the potential for just societies is
prevalent. All the answers are given in two essays written by writers based on this subject. As
explained by Charles Tilly in his essay "Blame", seeking justice cannot be overlooked, and with so
many opinions on the subject, this needs to...show more content...
Charles Tilly explains when a nightclub accidentally burned to the ground and killed multiple people
(Tilly 91–93). Without justice, society would be diminished to ash, and rubble in a matter of
moments. Certain precautions need to be observed, and not overlooked in a just society. This
situation proposes the same argument about how can life be more justifiable. These all explained by
Velasquez in his essay "What is Justice". Manual Velasquez explains retributive justice "It's common
to think of justice in retributive terms–that is, in terms of crime and the punishments that
government inflicts on criminals" (Velasquez 558). Just would still need to be sought for, even in an
accidental case like this one
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Essay on Justice
Essay on Justice
'Justice is such an elusive concept that it hardly seems worthwhile for a legal system to strive to
achieve it'.
Justice is something that we all want from a Law and believe should be an integral part in any legal
system. However, the meaning of Justice is very difficult to define. There are many aspects of justice
that we may question about; i.e. is a particular law just? Is the legal system just? Much of the issue
of justice is very controversial and raises questions such as whether the combination of Law and
system produce a just result? Justice has a definition as follows: 'The quality of being just or fair,
the act of determining rights and assigning rewards or...show more content...
The logical extension of this view is that the Legal rules of a country can be broken if they do not
conform to moral Laws, a view that was favoured by St. Thomas Aquinas. This theory of Natural
Law can be contrasted with Positivism. Natural lawyers conflict with positivist thinkers who
believe that if the Law is made according to correct procedure, then it should be followed however
much it conflicts with morality. Positivists like Kelsen argue that Law and morality are entirely
separate concepts, and believes that justice is abstract, therefore it is has no concept in Law.
Kelsen also argued that the concept of justice is too vague to be defined and that even if law is
immoral, it still should be followed. Austin's view stems from the positivist argument that Law is
Law because of sovereignty and procedures. Professor Hart also considers law and morality to be
separate. He believed that Law should be based on logical ideas that produce correct decisions
from the rules. Durkheim, a sociologist, took the view that society is held together 'a cohesion' and
that the Law is an integral part of making these structures work. Kelsen's theory can be contrasted
to LL Fuller who favours the natural Law theory. Fuller took the example of the Nazi Law and
condemned with their Legal system. He argued that Nazi Law was not Law at all as it was so
fundamentally unjust.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. The Justice System Essay
The Justice System
Looking into criminal justice procedure, many administrations are at work. Starting with the police,
to the courts and concluding in corrections. Though all these sectors have different tasks, their
combined focus is processing the law. Regardless what the process is called criminal justice will
continue to serve with discretion, conviction, and correction. When first presented with the question
whether criminal justice is a system, non–system, and network I leaned toward a network.
Throughout our discussions, lectures, and readings I felt the process presented itself as a network.
Intertwined divisions working for a common goal. Further into my research and help from Webster, I
decided that the criminal justice...show more content...
These departments involve everyone throughout the sequence of events in the criminal justice system
including lawyers, judges, police, criminals, victims, and the society in which this occurs. Every
action and repercussion is seen and felt by all involved in a particular case. This is why all of these
players in the game of law depend on the actions and results of one another.
This dependency arises from numerous situations and circumstances. The police depend on
convictions from the court to see results for their job. Each sector must rely on the outcome of trial
cases to proceed. Plea–bargaining is a great example. Three or more parties are involved, the
prosecutor and defense attorneys must present the best and most reasonable deal, from their
perspective, and the defendant must agree to the terms. In some cases a judge can be a contributing
factor. Society is the most dependent and most critical, always keeping the department on its toes.
Dependency in this case does have its benefits. It provides the system with a check and balance
system.
Considering again Cohn's arguments that the criminal justice process should not be defined as a
system he makes some strong points, that have strong counter points. In short he states this process
is a continuum through which each offender passes, from the police, to the courts, into prison and
then back onto the streets. He quotes
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

6. Essay about Justice
Justice
When the question is asked "Can we live in a just world?" In effect it is asking us a
variety of things. "Can there be justice for all?" and "Can there be equality for all
people?". The answer to this question is no.
Unfortunately we live in a world where justice has never really transpired. The first justice that I
would like to speak about is personal justice. Blessed are those reared in a household innocence of
the deadly sin of envy. Their lives will be tormented by a grinding resentment that they are not
beautiful, or famous, or favored with gifts of fortune. They will not demand as a natural right or an
entitlement of personal equality with everybody under the sun; nor maintain that their...show more
content...
I feel that would be unfair, and ignorant. The stranger should have to earn my respect, just like my
parents or friends. The teachings of Marx exemplified this very wrong that I am discussing. Marx
believed (if I am not mistaken)that in order to bring about equality for all, first we must find the
inequality between classes and get rid of it. When this deed is performed it would in essence
place everybody on the same level. This would place all people in an equality of conditions, where
all are in the same boat. The average person would be faced with the same problems as the next. This
is the type of "just" society that I do not think should exist. It is absolutely unjust.
I have no doubt that when we recognize the differences between people, without being envious of
their talents and gifts, we may find things that we may learn from. By doing this we not only
make life more bearable by eliminating ignorance, but learning to love differences Many of the
problems today are caused because people fail to see the glory in variance. This is the problem of
mis–education, or lack of it. Education is also part of justice. I believe that all people (however
unrealistic that this may be) whether rich or poor should be placed with an equivalence of
education. The dilemma I face when making this statement is that it is contradictory to almost all
that I have previously stated. If people
Get more content on HelpWriting.net