Paper Writing Service - HelpWriting.net 👈 ✅ Quality You get an original and high-quality paper based on extensive research. The completed work will be correctly formatted, referenced and tailored to your level of study. ✅ Confidentiality We value your privacy. We do not disclose your personal information to any third party without your consent. Your payment data is also safely handled as you process the payment through a secured and verified payment processor. ✅ Originality Every single order we deliver is written from scratch according to your instructions. We have zero tolerance for plagiarism, so all completed papers are unique and checked for plagiarism using a leading plagiarism detector. ✅ On-time delivery We strive to deliver quality custom written papers before the deadline. That's why you don't have to worry about missing the deadline for submitting your assignment. ✅ Free revisions You can ask to revise your paper as many times as you need until you're completely satisfied with the result. Provide notes about what needs to be changed, and we'll change it right away. ✅ 24/7 Support From answering simple questions to solving any possible issues, we're always here to help you in chat and on the phone. We've got you covered at any time, day or night. Essay on Justice Essay on Justice Justice is such an elusive concept that it hardly seems worthwhile for a legal system to strive to achieve it . Justice is something that we all want from a Law and believe should be an integral part in any legal system. However, the meaning of Justice is very difficult to define. There are many aspects of justice that we may question about; i.e. is a particular law just? Is the legal system just? Much of the issue of justice is very controversial and raises questions such as whether the combination of Law and system produce a just result? Justice has a definition as follows: The quality of being just or fair, the act of determining rights and assigning rewards or...show more content...The logical extension of this view is that the Legal rules of a country can be broken if they do not conform to moral Laws, a view that was favoured by St. Thomas Aquinas. This theory of Natural Law can be contrasted with Positivism. Natural lawyers conflict with positivist thinkers who believe that if the Law is made according to correct procedure, then it should be followed however much it conflicts with morality. Positivists like Kelsen argue that Law and morality are entirely separate concepts, and believes that justice is abstract, therefore it is has no concept in Law. Kelsen also argued that the concept of justice is too vague to be defined and that even if law is immoral, it still should be followed. Austin s view stems from the positivist argument that Law is Law because of sovereignty and procedures. Professor Hart also considers law and morality to be separate. He believed that Law should be based on logical ideas that produce correct decisions from the

1. Essay on Justice
Essay on Justice
'Justice is such an elusive concept that it hardly seems worthwhile for a legal system to strive to
achieve it'.
Justice is something that we all want from a Law and believe should be an integral part in any legal
system. However, the meaning of Justice is very difficult to define. There are many aspects of justice
that we may question about; i.e. is a particular law just? Is the legal system just? Much of the issue
of justice is very controversial and raises questions such as whether the combination of Law and
system produce a just result? Justice has a definition as follows: 'The quality of being just or fair,
the act of determining rights and assigning rewards or...show more content...
The logical extension of this view is that the Legal rules of a country can be broken if they do not
conform to moral Laws, a view that was favoured by St. Thomas Aquinas. This theory of Natural
Law can be contrasted with Positivism. Natural lawyers conflict with positivist thinkers who
believe that if the Law is made according to correct procedure, then it should be followed however
much it conflicts with morality. Positivists like Kelsen argue that Law and morality are entirely
separate concepts, and believes that justice is abstract, therefore it is has no concept in Law.
Kelsen also argued that the concept of justice is too vague to be defined and that even if law is
immoral, it still should be followed. Austin's view stems from the positivist argument that Law is
Law because of sovereignty and procedures. Professor Hart also considers law and morality to be
separate. He believed that Law should be based on logical ideas that produce correct decisions
from the rules. Durkheim, a sociologist, took the view that society is held together 'a cohesion' and
that the Law is an integral part of making these structures work. Kelsen's theory can be contrasted
to LL Fuller who favours the natural Law theory. Fuller took the example of the Nazi Law and
condemned with their Legal system. He argued that Nazi Law was not Law at all as it was so
fundamentally unjust.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net