Language is inherently formulaic and lexical bundles make up a generous proportion of it. Lexical bundles are usually acquired through extensive exposure to fluent discourse. However, in an environment where exposure is limited, intervention may be helpful. This presentation was given at JALT2014: Conversations across borders conference
The relationship between vocabulary size and diversity in L2 writing (Vocab@V...Melanie Gonzalez
Abstract:
Although vocabulary has long been an important criterion for assessing second language (L2) writing proficiency, recent research on academic discourse has positioned word study as a leading method to improve learner writing. As a result, teachers must make decisions on which words warrant instructional time and how to help learners deploy these words effectively in production. While there has been a growing trend in research investigating word lists, comparatively fewer studies have examined how words are actually used to achieve writing quality.
Thus, the present paper reports the findings of a quantitative study that examined the extent to which vocabulary size and lexical diversity contributed to writing scores on 172 native and advanced non-native English speakers’ academic essays. Results revealed that lexical diversity had a significantly greater impact on writing score than vocabulary size in both native and non-native speaker essays. Nevertheless, vocabulary size did initially facilitate writing scores at the lower score levels; however, it was lexical diversity that promoted an essay into the higher score range. Additional findings demonstrated that vocabulary size had only a moderate relationship to lexical diversity.
Outcomes from this study suggest that variation of mid-range vocabulary may play a more important role in writing proficiency than the use of infrequent terms that signal a larger productive lexicon. Furthermore, the results indicate that it is not enough to simply teach vocabulary words in the L2 composition classroom, but to also guide learners in how to employ these words in a varied manner within their writing.
The Lexical Profile of Diverse and Sophisticated Academic EssaysMelanie Gonzalez
Presentation at the 14th Annual Symposium on Second Language Research in Auckland, New Zealand
Abstract: This presentation reports on a study that examined the contribution of word frequency to lexical diversity and sophistication in academic writing proficiency. Findings suggest that mid-frequency vocabulary may have a greater role than is typically given in the L2 composition classroom. Implications for practice and further analysis are discussed.
The relationship between vocabulary size and diversity in L2 writing (Vocab@V...Melanie Gonzalez
Abstract:
Although vocabulary has long been an important criterion for assessing second language (L2) writing proficiency, recent research on academic discourse has positioned word study as a leading method to improve learner writing. As a result, teachers must make decisions on which words warrant instructional time and how to help learners deploy these words effectively in production. While there has been a growing trend in research investigating word lists, comparatively fewer studies have examined how words are actually used to achieve writing quality.
Thus, the present paper reports the findings of a quantitative study that examined the extent to which vocabulary size and lexical diversity contributed to writing scores on 172 native and advanced non-native English speakers’ academic essays. Results revealed that lexical diversity had a significantly greater impact on writing score than vocabulary size in both native and non-native speaker essays. Nevertheless, vocabulary size did initially facilitate writing scores at the lower score levels; however, it was lexical diversity that promoted an essay into the higher score range. Additional findings demonstrated that vocabulary size had only a moderate relationship to lexical diversity.
Outcomes from this study suggest that variation of mid-range vocabulary may play a more important role in writing proficiency than the use of infrequent terms that signal a larger productive lexicon. Furthermore, the results indicate that it is not enough to simply teach vocabulary words in the L2 composition classroom, but to also guide learners in how to employ these words in a varied manner within their writing.
The Lexical Profile of Diverse and Sophisticated Academic EssaysMelanie Gonzalez
Presentation at the 14th Annual Symposium on Second Language Research in Auckland, New Zealand
Abstract: This presentation reports on a study that examined the contribution of word frequency to lexical diversity and sophistication in academic writing proficiency. Findings suggest that mid-frequency vocabulary may have a greater role than is typically given in the L2 composition classroom. Implications for practice and further analysis are discussed.
A contrastive linguistic analysis of inflectional bound morphemes of English,...Bahram Kazemian
In order to contrast and compare inflectional bound morphemes of English, Azeri and Persian languages and to identify their similarities and dissimilarities, inventories of English, Azeri and Farsi inflections, i.e. their set of affixes, were gathered, studied, and elaborated with some examples, and with English meanings. Eventually, after comparison, the researchers ended up with a series of statements about similarities and differences between these languages. The design of the present study is comparative-analytic which concentrates on the comparison and contrasting inflections of English, Azeri and Persian languages. The data is analyzed and illustrated through the contrastive method.
Lexical and syntactic ambiguity is a natural phenomenon in languages of the world. Generally, languages
are having lexical and syntactic ambiguity based on their prose and verses. Beside human beings, lexical
Ambiguity and polysemy is a big problem for the machine and online translation. For answering this problem and
finding the exact meaning of the word and sentence. the translation should through the context in which the word
is used. This paper deliberates upon types of ambiguity in Pashto and later discusses the kinds of lexical and
grammatical ambiguity in the Pashto data. Pashto lexemes were taken from the phrases, sentences and verses of
the Pashto poetry. 300 ambiguous words and lexemes were analyzed and described through Pashto examples. The
research shows that there were lexical, syntactical, semantic and grammatical ambiguities in Pashto language, and
grammatical ambiguity was described in hierarchal way with in Pashto examples in prose and verses.
Slideshare haidee thomson noticing and acquiring lexical bundles with schemat...Haidee Thomson
Noticing and acquiring lexical bundles with schematic linguistic representation - presentation given at Vocab@Vic conference 19 Dec, 2013. A study that investigates the efficacy of noticing lexical bundles with linguistic schematic representation in reading texts as a classroom teaching method for learning lexical bundles.
A contrastive linguistic analysis of inflectional bound morphemes of English,...Bahram Kazemian
In order to contrast and compare inflectional bound morphemes of English, Azeri and Persian languages and to identify their similarities and dissimilarities, inventories of English, Azeri and Farsi inflections, i.e. their set of affixes, were gathered, studied, and elaborated with some examples, and with English meanings. Eventually, after comparison, the researchers ended up with a series of statements about similarities and differences between these languages. The design of the present study is comparative-analytic which concentrates on the comparison and contrasting inflections of English, Azeri and Persian languages. The data is analyzed and illustrated through the contrastive method.
Lexical and syntactic ambiguity is a natural phenomenon in languages of the world. Generally, languages
are having lexical and syntactic ambiguity based on their prose and verses. Beside human beings, lexical
Ambiguity and polysemy is a big problem for the machine and online translation. For answering this problem and
finding the exact meaning of the word and sentence. the translation should through the context in which the word
is used. This paper deliberates upon types of ambiguity in Pashto and later discusses the kinds of lexical and
grammatical ambiguity in the Pashto data. Pashto lexemes were taken from the phrases, sentences and verses of
the Pashto poetry. 300 ambiguous words and lexemes were analyzed and described through Pashto examples. The
research shows that there were lexical, syntactical, semantic and grammatical ambiguities in Pashto language, and
grammatical ambiguity was described in hierarchal way with in Pashto examples in prose and verses.
Slideshare haidee thomson noticing and acquiring lexical bundles with schemat...Haidee Thomson
Noticing and acquiring lexical bundles with schematic linguistic representation - presentation given at Vocab@Vic conference 19 Dec, 2013. A study that investigates the efficacy of noticing lexical bundles with linguistic schematic representation in reading texts as a classroom teaching method for learning lexical bundles.
Types of L2 morphosyntactic knowledge that can and cannot be observed in lea...Ken Urano
2015 Joint International Methodology Research Colloquium KATE Corpus SIG & LET Kansai Methodology SIG @ National Institute for International Education May 16, 2015

Morphemes, Cognates, & Vocabulary: A Governor's Teacher Network StudyKenneth McKee
Leverage morphological and cognate knowledge to
improve Tier 2 vocabulary, a significant barrier for
English Language Learners' success. An instructional
framework and multiple strategies will be featured
in this Governor's Teacher Network session.
This is an experimental study based on exploring the effectiveness of task based language teaching (TBLT) in improving graduate students’ descriptive writing as well as their perception of task based language teaching. The accessible population taken in this study is 410 students enrolled in Graduation at Khawja Fareed Govt. Post Graduate College Rahim Yar Khan. 60 male students have been administered a TOEFL structure test to bring homogeneity. They have been divided into two equal groups randomly. Thus two groups were formed one the treatment group and the other control one. Experimental and control class data were collected through written tests and questionnaires. Written pre and post tests were administered to both classes. Questionnaires were given to the students in experimental group after each of 12 treatment tasks. Data from written pre and post-test and questionnaires were analysed quantitatively. Percentage analysis was run to observe improvement between the groups. Test results revealed highly significant difference in favour of the treatment group. The study also demonstrated treatment groups’ general perception of task based language teaching positively. Findings of this study are inspiring for the teachers to adopt task based language teaching to improve students’ descriptive writing.
Oral Reading Fluency Research : ED 520: Implementing Solutions for School-wide Effective Reading Instruction. American College of Education, November 2, 2012. To be presented at PEAK Teachers Conference, Kuwait, December 8, 2012.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
3. The idiom principle
‘a language user has available to him or her a
large number of semi-preconstructed phrases
that constitute single choices…’ (Sinclair, 1991:
110)
3
5. Speaking naturally is speaking idiomatically,
using frequent and familiar word sequences
(Ellis, 2001, p. 45)
5
6. • Use of formulaic language linked to fluency (Boers et al.,
2006; Pawley and Syder, 1983)
• Formulaic language is stored and processed
holistically (Jiang and Nekrasova, 2007; Wray, 2002)
• Faster processing
6
7. Each of…
The way in which…
Assume that…
Depend on…
The case of…
7
8. How do we learn formulaic language?
Native speakers get hours upon hours of input
- From family, community, school etc.
Second language learners receive limited input
- Not enough for incidental learning
• How can teachers expedite the learning process?
8
9. Without intervention
• Rely on word-combination knowledge from L1
(see Laufer and Waldman, 2011)
• Unnatural collocations = strain communication
(see Millar, 2011)
9
10. Possible interventions
• Textbook exercises – best to keep the collocation together (Boers,
Demecheleer, Coxhead, & Webb, 2013)
• Translate and notice L1 & L2 differences (Laufer & Girsai, 2008)
• Rote-memorisation (Myles, Hooper, & Mitchell, 1998; Yu, 2009)
• Encourage noticing (underline the formulaic sequence) (c.f. Boers et al., 2006;
Lewis, 1993)
10
11. Lexical bundles
• Most common type of formulaic language (Biber and Conrad, 1999)
• Functional – express stance, discourse organization and framing (Biber &
Barbieri, 2007, p. 265)
• Occur 10-40 times per million words in sub-corpora of a single register
as a result of
by the end of
• Transparent meaning (not idioms)
• Often appear incomplete 11
13. Research questions
• Can learners produce more lexical bundles after they have been noticed
with schematic linguistic representation?
• Compared to previous methods, is this an effective way of noticing and
learning lexical bundles?
13
14. Participants
• 3 intact classes at a private university in Japan
• Share Japanese as L1
• Completed high school and 1st year English classes
• Second year mixed proficiency classes
• N=65
14
16. Pre-test example
16
Japanese Context example
1 やらなければいけないことがい
くらか残っています。
______ ____ _______ things that
need to be done.
17. Treatment texts
Two short narrative texts (100 words)
• High frequency words (90%)
• Topic 1: My cat
• Topic 2: My brother
List of lexical bundles to be found, underlined and/or labeled
Bare noticing - The way in which she tricks
NSLR - The way in which (det + N) + VP
MFI – no list 17
18. Scoring method
• 33 words spread over 9 lexical bundles of various lengths
(3-8 words)
• 1 point per word
• 0.5 incremental learning evidence
-Right word but wrong order
-Incorrect article in correct order
-Incomplete word e.g. develop (ment)
18
19. 9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Mean scores of immediate and delayed post-tests
by treatment
Bare noticing NSLR MFI
Mean
Treatment
Immediate
Delayed
d = .70
†
d = .84
*
* p < .05 (sig)
† p < .10
19
20. Interpretation
• Noticing with schematic linguistic representation is
more effective than bare noticing (immediate post-test)
Why?
Bare noticing - Find and underline as a result of her trickiness
NSLR - Find, underline and label as a result of (determiner + noun)
• NSLR required more attention/evaluation
• Involvement load table on next slide
20
21. Involvement load for vocabulary (Hulstijn & Laufer, 2001)
21
Condition Need
Extrinsic=1
Intrinsic=2
Search
(for meaning)
Evaluation
(of appropriate
use)
Involvement
Index
(total)
Bare-noticing Moderate 1 Absence 0 Absence 0 1
NSLR Moderate 1 Absence 0 Moderate 1 2
MFI (non-LB area of text) Absence 0 Absence 0 Absence 0 0
MFI (LB area of text) Moderate 1 Moderate 1 Moderate 1 3
Formulaic language shows similar learning patterns to vocab (Alali & Schmitt, 2012)
23. Once is not enough
• Noticing with schematic linguistic representation was
more effective than bare noticing (immediate post-test)
• But difference disappeared over time (2 week delayed post-test)
- Rehearsal is necessary for long term memory creation
- Productive use
23
24. Lessons for the classroom
Noticing lexical bundles appears to also be effective for uptake
Ask learners to underline lexical bundles in texts
Ask learners to underline and label lexical bundles in texts
Involvement load for vocabulary learning (Hulstijn and Laufer, 2001)
Helps to describe involvement in lexical bundle learning
Check for presence of need, search and evaluation
in lexical bundle learning tasks
24
26. Alali, F. A., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Teaching formulaic sequences: The same as or different from teaching single words? TESOL Journal, 3(2), 153–180. doi:10.1002/tesj.13
Biber, D. & Conrad, S. (1999). Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In H. Hasselgård & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 181–190). Amsterdam:
Rodopi.
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. doi:10.1093/applin/25.3.371
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, S., & Leech, G. N. (2002). Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (2013). Gauging the effects of exercises on verb-noun collocations. Language Teaching Research.
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245–
261
Ellis, N. C. (2001). Memory for Language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hulstijn, J., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539–58.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
Jiang, N., & Nekrasova, T. M. (2007). The Processing of Formulaic Sequences by Second Language Speakers. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 433–445. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00589.x
Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-Focused Instruction in Second Language Vocabulary Learning: A Case for Contrastive Analysis and Translation. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 694–716.
doi:10.1093/applin/amn018
Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb‐Noun Collocations in Second Language Writing: A Corpus Analysis of Learners’ English. Language Learning, 61(2), 647–672. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x
Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. London: Language Teaching Publications.
Liu, D. (2012). The most frequently-used multi-word constructions in academic written English: A multi-corpus study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(1), 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2011.07.002
Millar, N. (2011). The processing of malformed formulaic language. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 129–148. doi:10.1093/applin/amq035
Myles, F., Hooper, J., & Mitchell, R. (1998). Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning. Language Learning, 48(3), 323–364. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00045
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191–225). London:
Longman.
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512. doi:10.1093/applin/amp058
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26
Editor's Notes
…Even though they might appear to be analysable into segments. To some extent this may reflect the recurrence of similar situations in human affairs; it may illustrate a natural tendency to economy of effort; or it may be motivated in part by the exigencies of real-time conversation’.
Ellis, N. C. (2001). Memory for Language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Many phrases and expressions that we use are not original but rather common and can be anticipated from context. ‘conversational speech is broken into fluent units of complete grammatical clauses of four to ten words, uttered at or at faster than normal rates of articulation.’-Ellis p. 45
Not enough natural exposure in EFL environment to pick them up incidentally
Liu made list – noted incompleteness – difficult for learning
Method hasn’t been tested, this is the first study to test empirically the efficacy of this method for noticing lexical bundles
To gage effectiveness of SLR I decided to compare it with a known way of noticing formulas, and also a control condition
Translation by Japanese native and checked by an independent bilingual for accuracy
Translation by Japanese native and checked by an independent bilingual for accuracy
Longer LBs more difficult to remember, so score spread evenly over words
ANOVA showed sig. diff between immediate post-test scores in different treatments (F(2,62) = 3.80, p < .05, ω2 = .09), but not in delayed post-testsBonferroni post-hoc comparisons showed NLSR (M =7.63, SD = 4.36) to be sig. higher than bare-noticing noticing (M =4.38, SD = 3.27) (Mdiff =3.25, 95% CI [.17, 6.32], p < .05, d = .84). Also NSLR was higher than MFI (M = 4.67, SD = 4.10) this diff was approaching significance with large effect size (Mdiff =2.97, 95% CI [-.15, 6.09], p > .05, d = .70).
Greater evaluation = more attention = greater uptake
Involvement load (language learning tasks can be evaluated by need, search, evaluation). If searching for the L1 meaning in the translation was added, uptake might be greater.
Greater evaluation = more attention = greater uptake