It Final Presentation
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•175 views
This document discusses the differences between traditional controlled vocabularies used in library cataloging systems and social tagging by users. Controlled vocabularies provide authoritative, structured hierarchies but require subject expertise, while tags are more intuitive and provide additional access points, but quality and specificity can vary. The document argues that an integration of both systems, using tags to supplement controlled vocabularies, can best balance their strengths and weaknesses to increase access. It provides Library of Congress subject headings and LibraryThing tags as examples and notes that LibraryThing is currently used by over 1,500 libraries, including several in New Jersey.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Taxonomy of Knowledge Management
The document discusses taxonomy, which is defined as a subject-based classification that arranges terms in a controlled vocabulary to group related terms together and make information easier to find. There are four main types of taxonomy architectures: flat, hierarchical, faceted, and network. Hierarchical taxonomies structure content into at least two levels with bi-directional hierarchies. Facet taxonomies describe properties or values of a topic through different attributes and facet values. Network taxonomies organize content into both hierarchical and associative categories, allowing any two nodes to be linked. The document also discusses browse vs. formal taxonomies, strengths and weaknesses of each, and examples of taxonomy/text analytics software and vendors.
FYE AHSS
This document provides an introduction to information literacy for students in the arts, humanities, and social sciences. It outlines key learning outcomes around describing library resources, locating the library catalog and subject-specific resources, and analyzing information and articles for scholarly attributes. It then details several important library resources like the library website, catalog, and research services, as well as subject-specific databases. It also discusses evaluating sources and information analysis activities. The main points are that the library website is the primary research portal, subject databases are critical resources, and analyzing information sources is important.
Taxonomies & folksonomies
- Taxonomy is a classification system that arranges information into a hierarchical structure of categories and subcategories. It involves assigning terms to content items that describe essential characteristics.
- Folksonomy is a bottom-up categorization system created by users tagging information. It involves social tagging where users freely assign keywords or tags to items. This allows for more dynamic and user-focused organization of information compared to formal taxonomies but lacks precision and structure.
- Both taxonomy and folksonomy have advantages and disadvantages for organizing information, with taxonomy providing more control and structure and folksonomy reflecting real user needs and languages but lacking oversight and standardization. The document discusses the differences and various applications of taxonomy and folk
Socialstudiesresearch fall09
The document provides guidance for students conducting social studies research, outlining key steps such as clarifying expectations, selecting sources from reference books, academic journals, online archives and the school library, and noting search strategies like using a password manager and favorite search engines. Students are also advised to document sources thoroughly to avoid plagiarism using citation styles.
Mobile Brochure Builder Mobile Catalog Builder
This document discusses Mobile Brochure Builder (MBB), an online tool that allows users to create mobile brochures without development experience. MBB stands for Mobile Brochure Builder and enables drag-and-drop creation of brochures including pages for menus, maps, galleries, images and text. The document then provides examples of how mobile brochures created with MBB can be used with SMS marketing campaigns, interactive SMS responses, call centers, and Bluetooth advertising.
Final Paper
LibraryThing is a social cataloging website that allows users to catalog their personal book collections and share them with others. It has over 30 million book covers and 27 million books cataloged. LibraryThing for Libraries (LTFL) integrates tags and reviews from LibraryThing into library catalogs. This provides an alternative searching method to controlled vocabularies like LCSH that may be more accessible to users. While tags increase access points, they also lack structure and authority control. Using both tags and controlled vocabularies together could help mitigate tags' weaknesses and create a more comprehensive catalog. Libraries are incorporating social features like tags to better connect with users and match how information is accessed in a digital environment.
Collaborative Cataloging
Collaborative cataloging involves libraries working together to create bibliographic records that can be accessed and used by all participating members. It allows libraries to leverage existing cataloging while reducing costs. New social cataloging systems make use of web technologies and user contributions to create catalogs, connecting users based on books and providing recommendations. While offering benefits like increased access and engagement, social catalogs also present challenges around vocabulary control, information organization, and bias that require oversight from professional catalogers.
Tagging, Bookmarking & Cataloging: The Social Side
Join us for an hour-long online workshop about some of the most prominent features of the dynamic web: social tagging and social bookmarking. Different services will be highlighted such as Delicious and LibraryThing. We will also show how to incorporate some of these features into your own website using widgets. There will be time for the discussion of best practices and the merit of these tools as well as some real world examples of how libraries are implementing them.
Recommended
Taxonomy of Knowledge Management
The document discusses taxonomy, which is defined as a subject-based classification that arranges terms in a controlled vocabulary to group related terms together and make information easier to find. There are four main types of taxonomy architectures: flat, hierarchical, faceted, and network. Hierarchical taxonomies structure content into at least two levels with bi-directional hierarchies. Facet taxonomies describe properties or values of a topic through different attributes and facet values. Network taxonomies organize content into both hierarchical and associative categories, allowing any two nodes to be linked. The document also discusses browse vs. formal taxonomies, strengths and weaknesses of each, and examples of taxonomy/text analytics software and vendors.
FYE AHSS
This document provides an introduction to information literacy for students in the arts, humanities, and social sciences. It outlines key learning outcomes around describing library resources, locating the library catalog and subject-specific resources, and analyzing information and articles for scholarly attributes. It then details several important library resources like the library website, catalog, and research services, as well as subject-specific databases. It also discusses evaluating sources and information analysis activities. The main points are that the library website is the primary research portal, subject databases are critical resources, and analyzing information sources is important.
Taxonomies & folksonomies
- Taxonomy is a classification system that arranges information into a hierarchical structure of categories and subcategories. It involves assigning terms to content items that describe essential characteristics.
- Folksonomy is a bottom-up categorization system created by users tagging information. It involves social tagging where users freely assign keywords or tags to items. This allows for more dynamic and user-focused organization of information compared to formal taxonomies but lacks precision and structure.
- Both taxonomy and folksonomy have advantages and disadvantages for organizing information, with taxonomy providing more control and structure and folksonomy reflecting real user needs and languages but lacking oversight and standardization. The document discusses the differences and various applications of taxonomy and folk
Socialstudiesresearch fall09
The document provides guidance for students conducting social studies research, outlining key steps such as clarifying expectations, selecting sources from reference books, academic journals, online archives and the school library, and noting search strategies like using a password manager and favorite search engines. Students are also advised to document sources thoroughly to avoid plagiarism using citation styles.
Mobile Brochure Builder Mobile Catalog Builder
This document discusses Mobile Brochure Builder (MBB), an online tool that allows users to create mobile brochures without development experience. MBB stands for Mobile Brochure Builder and enables drag-and-drop creation of brochures including pages for menus, maps, galleries, images and text. The document then provides examples of how mobile brochures created with MBB can be used with SMS marketing campaigns, interactive SMS responses, call centers, and Bluetooth advertising.
Final Paper
LibraryThing is a social cataloging website that allows users to catalog their personal book collections and share them with others. It has over 30 million book covers and 27 million books cataloged. LibraryThing for Libraries (LTFL) integrates tags and reviews from LibraryThing into library catalogs. This provides an alternative searching method to controlled vocabularies like LCSH that may be more accessible to users. While tags increase access points, they also lack structure and authority control. Using both tags and controlled vocabularies together could help mitigate tags' weaknesses and create a more comprehensive catalog. Libraries are incorporating social features like tags to better connect with users and match how information is accessed in a digital environment.
Collaborative Cataloging
Collaborative cataloging involves libraries working together to create bibliographic records that can be accessed and used by all participating members. It allows libraries to leverage existing cataloging while reducing costs. New social cataloging systems make use of web technologies and user contributions to create catalogs, connecting users based on books and providing recommendations. While offering benefits like increased access and engagement, social catalogs also present challenges around vocabulary control, information organization, and bias that require oversight from professional catalogers.
Tagging, Bookmarking & Cataloging: The Social Side
Join us for an hour-long online workshop about some of the most prominent features of the dynamic web: social tagging and social bookmarking. Different services will be highlighted such as Delicious and LibraryThing. We will also show how to incorporate some of these features into your own website using widgets. There will be time for the discussion of best practices and the merit of these tools as well as some real world examples of how libraries are implementing them.
Folksonomies: a bottom-up social categorization system
Folksonomies are a bottom-up social system for categorizing and sharing content created by users tagging resources with freely chosen keywords or tags. They have no controlled vocabulary or defined relationships between terms, instead allowing collaboration and adaptation through shared user-generated metadata. While lacking formal structure, folksonomies lower barriers to cooperation and foster serendipitous discovery, but can suffer from ambiguity due to synonyms, polysemy and other issues with vocabulary.
Knowledge organization
Co-researcher with Nieves Regino
** this Presentation shows, KOS, types and future insights which has political effect.
Knowledge organization system
Knowledge organization (KO) refers to activities like document description, indexing and classification performed in libraries and databases to organize documents and concepts. Knowledge organization systems (KOS) include classification schemes, subject headings, thesauri and other systems used to organize information. KOS impose structures on collections and can be used in digital libraries to provide overviews and support retrieval, though different KOS may characterize entities differently. Common types of KOS include term lists, classifications and categories, and relationship lists.
Next generation online catalogs
The document discusses the evolution of library catalogs from traditional to next-generation systems. Traditional catalogs were limited in scope and functionality, focusing only on printed materials. Next-generation catalogs incorporate features like federated search across multiple resources, enriched content like images and summaries, faceted navigation, user contributions and reviews, and recommendations. They integrate these new features and services into a unified discovery interface to provide a more modern library experience.
Taxonomy made easy
The document discusses different types of taxonomies and controlled vocabularies including their definitions, purposes, and benefits. It describes term lists, synonym rings, authority files, hierarchical taxonomies, thesauri, and ontologies. The key purposes are to help people find information using different terms, retrieve relevant concepts rather than just words, and organize information into logical hierarchies or relationships to aid searching and browsing. Solo information professionals are common accidental taxonomists.
Should libraries discontinue using and maintaining controlled subject vocabul...
An assignment discussing the use of Controlled Vocabulary against the ides of social tagging in metadata (Folksonomy). This assignment was part of the requirements for the class: Classification and Subject Indexing for the Diploma in Library in Information Science.
Tagging & Folksonomies poster
Tags are keywords created by users to identify and retrieve digital resources. Folksonomies are composed of user-generated tags applied to content. Tags can be broad, applied by many users to the same content, or narrow, applied by individual users to their own content. Museum applications of tagging encourage personal interpretations, foster relationships between viewers and museums, and serve museums' altruistic goals. The Steve Museum project explored tagging's potential in museums by motivating, guiding, and rewarding user tagging. Tagging in libraries moves away from library-centered organization toward personal experiences and feelings. It reaffirms traditional subjects and facets while also producing new descriptors and representations. Tagging provides inexpensive organization and community through user-generated vocabular
Hybrid Approaches to Taxonomy & Folksonmy
The document discusses hybrid approaches to taxonomy and folksonomy for information organization. It describes how taxonomies and folksonomies each have strengths and weaknesses. Hybrid approaches discussed include having taxonomies and folksonomies co-exist, using tags to influence taxonomy development, and presenting taxonomy terms as tags for users. The document also outlines some corporate social tagging tools.
confernece paper
The document discusses the next generation of integrated library systems moving towards modularity and outward integration. Key points are:
1) Future integrated library systems will be more modular, allowing components to be combined more flexibly like Lego blocks. This will enable linking between different systems rather than building monolithic systems.
2) Integration should focus outwardly, making library collections visible on the open web where users search. This allows pulling users from search engines into library resources.
3) A longer term vision sees a more coherent global system for discovery and delivery of information across open, loosely connected systems. Libraries play a role alongside other providers and search engines.
Theresa regli bw-3
Folksonomies allow users to collaboratively tag and categorize content, creating an informal taxonomy without a controlled vocabulary. While this gives users freedom and flexibility, it can also result in inconsistencies and redundancies compared to formal taxonomies designed by experts. An ideal system may combine the user involvement of folksonomies with some structure and controls from traditional taxonomies.
Playing Tag : Cataloging by the Crowd
The document discusses different approaches to tagging and cataloging used by various systems including traditional library catalogs, Wikipedia, Flickr, del.icio.us, CiteULike, and LibraryThing. It notes that traditional library catalogs require determining a single subject heading, whereas user tagging allows multiple tags and is more flexible but less controlled. Systems like Wikipedia, Flickr, del.icio.us and LibraryThing allow social tagging by users for navigation and discovery while CiteULike is used for tagging citations.
#Socialtagging: Defining its role in the academic library
Paper presented at the University at Buffalo Graduate School of Education Student Research Symposium, Buffalo, NY, with Annalise Ammer, April 14, 2011.
In other words...: Using multiple taxonimies
The document discusses the perspectives and contexts in which information objects are created, collected, described, discovered, and used over time. It also summarizes the services provided by the Knowledge and Library Services at Harvard Business School, including collections, reference services, web services, and knowledge and information assets management. Finally, it discusses the changing models in taxonomy management, controlled vocabularies, and perspectives in accessing information over time.
Porting Library Vocabularies to the Semantic Web - IFLA 2010
The document discusses opportunities for libraries to contribute their established vocabularies and classification systems to the Semantic Web. It outlines steps libraries can take to audit, publish, and integrate their vocabularies according to Semantic Web standards. This will help bring necessary structure and organization to the Web of data by leveraging libraries' proven heritage in developing controlled vocabularies.
Taxonomies for Publishing: Enhancing the User Experience
The document discusses how taxonomies can enhance the user experience for publishers by better organizing content and connecting related works. It notes that currently much content remains siloed or disconnected. The solution proposed is for publishers to develop their own taxonomies to index and semantically tag their content with subjects, entities, people and places. This would allow linking related works together and provide more value to users through improved discovery and recommendations within the publisher's collections.
Online Finding Aids
This document discusses implications for archival management and patron access from analyzing Joyner Library's finding aid interface. It notes that a high-quality interface that enables patrons to easily find information without staff assistance can increase use of archival materials while better utilizing staff time. However, this may also increase demand on staff. The document also discusses considerations for data management and tracking usage statistics. It provides an extensive list of references on finding aid usability and provides general guidelines for an effective collections guide interface.
Social Web 2.0 Class Week 8: Social Metadata, Ratings, Social Tagging
Week 8 slides from the class "Social Web 2.0" I taught at the University of Washington's Masters in Communication program in 2007. Most of the content is still very relevant today. Topics: Social metadata, ratings, and social tagging.
IFLA 2010 Poster 72 presentation, Gothenburg, Sweden
IFLA 2010 Poster 72 presentation at Gothenburg, Sweden.
Title: Creating Global Community of Library Users with Open-Hybrid Taxonomy and Folksonomy
Presenter: Alka Bhatnagar, United States
Creating Global Community of Library Users With Open Hybrid Taxonomy and Folk...
The document discusses using a hybrid of taxonomy and folksonomy, or socially collaborative tagging, to create a global community of library users. It defines taxonomy as controlled vocabulary created by experts, while folksonomy involves user-generated tags. A hybrid approach augments formal subject headings with richer metadata from tags. This enhances discoverability and resonates with diverse global audiences. It empowers users and offers a system where taxonomy remains unchanged but folksonomy supplements it with additional terms from user knowledge and backgrounds.
Ifla 2010 Poster 72
Title: Creating global community of library users with open hybrid taxonomy and folksonomy.
Event : IFLA 2010 Poster session Number 72
Tags: Taxonomy, folksonomy, expansion of knowledge, alka bhatnagar, ifla 2010, poster 72, customer empowerment
More Related Content
Similar to It Final Presentation
Folksonomies: a bottom-up social categorization system
Folksonomies are a bottom-up social system for categorizing and sharing content created by users tagging resources with freely chosen keywords or tags. They have no controlled vocabulary or defined relationships between terms, instead allowing collaboration and adaptation through shared user-generated metadata. While lacking formal structure, folksonomies lower barriers to cooperation and foster serendipitous discovery, but can suffer from ambiguity due to synonyms, polysemy and other issues with vocabulary.
Knowledge organization
Co-researcher with Nieves Regino
** this Presentation shows, KOS, types and future insights which has political effect.
Knowledge organization system
Knowledge organization (KO) refers to activities like document description, indexing and classification performed in libraries and databases to organize documents and concepts. Knowledge organization systems (KOS) include classification schemes, subject headings, thesauri and other systems used to organize information. KOS impose structures on collections and can be used in digital libraries to provide overviews and support retrieval, though different KOS may characterize entities differently. Common types of KOS include term lists, classifications and categories, and relationship lists.
Next generation online catalogs
The document discusses the evolution of library catalogs from traditional to next-generation systems. Traditional catalogs were limited in scope and functionality, focusing only on printed materials. Next-generation catalogs incorporate features like federated search across multiple resources, enriched content like images and summaries, faceted navigation, user contributions and reviews, and recommendations. They integrate these new features and services into a unified discovery interface to provide a more modern library experience.
Taxonomy made easy
The document discusses different types of taxonomies and controlled vocabularies including their definitions, purposes, and benefits. It describes term lists, synonym rings, authority files, hierarchical taxonomies, thesauri, and ontologies. The key purposes are to help people find information using different terms, retrieve relevant concepts rather than just words, and organize information into logical hierarchies or relationships to aid searching and browsing. Solo information professionals are common accidental taxonomists.
Should libraries discontinue using and maintaining controlled subject vocabul...
An assignment discussing the use of Controlled Vocabulary against the ides of social tagging in metadata (Folksonomy). This assignment was part of the requirements for the class: Classification and Subject Indexing for the Diploma in Library in Information Science.
Tagging & Folksonomies poster
Tags are keywords created by users to identify and retrieve digital resources. Folksonomies are composed of user-generated tags applied to content. Tags can be broad, applied by many users to the same content, or narrow, applied by individual users to their own content. Museum applications of tagging encourage personal interpretations, foster relationships between viewers and museums, and serve museums' altruistic goals. The Steve Museum project explored tagging's potential in museums by motivating, guiding, and rewarding user tagging. Tagging in libraries moves away from library-centered organization toward personal experiences and feelings. It reaffirms traditional subjects and facets while also producing new descriptors and representations. Tagging provides inexpensive organization and community through user-generated vocabular
Hybrid Approaches to Taxonomy & Folksonmy
The document discusses hybrid approaches to taxonomy and folksonomy for information organization. It describes how taxonomies and folksonomies each have strengths and weaknesses. Hybrid approaches discussed include having taxonomies and folksonomies co-exist, using tags to influence taxonomy development, and presenting taxonomy terms as tags for users. The document also outlines some corporate social tagging tools.
confernece paper
The document discusses the next generation of integrated library systems moving towards modularity and outward integration. Key points are:
1) Future integrated library systems will be more modular, allowing components to be combined more flexibly like Lego blocks. This will enable linking between different systems rather than building monolithic systems.
2) Integration should focus outwardly, making library collections visible on the open web where users search. This allows pulling users from search engines into library resources.
3) A longer term vision sees a more coherent global system for discovery and delivery of information across open, loosely connected systems. Libraries play a role alongside other providers and search engines.
Theresa regli bw-3
Folksonomies allow users to collaboratively tag and categorize content, creating an informal taxonomy without a controlled vocabulary. While this gives users freedom and flexibility, it can also result in inconsistencies and redundancies compared to formal taxonomies designed by experts. An ideal system may combine the user involvement of folksonomies with some structure and controls from traditional taxonomies.
Playing Tag : Cataloging by the Crowd
The document discusses different approaches to tagging and cataloging used by various systems including traditional library catalogs, Wikipedia, Flickr, del.icio.us, CiteULike, and LibraryThing. It notes that traditional library catalogs require determining a single subject heading, whereas user tagging allows multiple tags and is more flexible but less controlled. Systems like Wikipedia, Flickr, del.icio.us and LibraryThing allow social tagging by users for navigation and discovery while CiteULike is used for tagging citations.
#Socialtagging: Defining its role in the academic library
Paper presented at the University at Buffalo Graduate School of Education Student Research Symposium, Buffalo, NY, with Annalise Ammer, April 14, 2011.
In other words...: Using multiple taxonimies
The document discusses the perspectives and contexts in which information objects are created, collected, described, discovered, and used over time. It also summarizes the services provided by the Knowledge and Library Services at Harvard Business School, including collections, reference services, web services, and knowledge and information assets management. Finally, it discusses the changing models in taxonomy management, controlled vocabularies, and perspectives in accessing information over time.
Porting Library Vocabularies to the Semantic Web - IFLA 2010
The document discusses opportunities for libraries to contribute their established vocabularies and classification systems to the Semantic Web. It outlines steps libraries can take to audit, publish, and integrate their vocabularies according to Semantic Web standards. This will help bring necessary structure and organization to the Web of data by leveraging libraries' proven heritage in developing controlled vocabularies.
Taxonomies for Publishing: Enhancing the User Experience
The document discusses how taxonomies can enhance the user experience for publishers by better organizing content and connecting related works. It notes that currently much content remains siloed or disconnected. The solution proposed is for publishers to develop their own taxonomies to index and semantically tag their content with subjects, entities, people and places. This would allow linking related works together and provide more value to users through improved discovery and recommendations within the publisher's collections.
Online Finding Aids
This document discusses implications for archival management and patron access from analyzing Joyner Library's finding aid interface. It notes that a high-quality interface that enables patrons to easily find information without staff assistance can increase use of archival materials while better utilizing staff time. However, this may also increase demand on staff. The document also discusses considerations for data management and tracking usage statistics. It provides an extensive list of references on finding aid usability and provides general guidelines for an effective collections guide interface.
Social Web 2.0 Class Week 8: Social Metadata, Ratings, Social Tagging
Week 8 slides from the class "Social Web 2.0" I taught at the University of Washington's Masters in Communication program in 2007. Most of the content is still very relevant today. Topics: Social metadata, ratings, and social tagging.
IFLA 2010 Poster 72 presentation, Gothenburg, Sweden
IFLA 2010 Poster 72 presentation at Gothenburg, Sweden.
Title: Creating Global Community of Library Users with Open-Hybrid Taxonomy and Folksonomy
Presenter: Alka Bhatnagar, United States
Creating Global Community of Library Users With Open Hybrid Taxonomy and Folk...
The document discusses using a hybrid of taxonomy and folksonomy, or socially collaborative tagging, to create a global community of library users. It defines taxonomy as controlled vocabulary created by experts, while folksonomy involves user-generated tags. A hybrid approach augments formal subject headings with richer metadata from tags. This enhances discoverability and resonates with diverse global audiences. It empowers users and offers a system where taxonomy remains unchanged but folksonomy supplements it with additional terms from user knowledge and backgrounds.
Ifla 2010 Poster 72
Title: Creating global community of library users with open hybrid taxonomy and folksonomy.
Event : IFLA 2010 Poster session Number 72
Tags: Taxonomy, folksonomy, expansion of knowledge, alka bhatnagar, ifla 2010, poster 72, customer empowerment
Similar to It Final Presentation (20)
Folksonomies: a bottom-up social categorization system
Folksonomies: a bottom-up social categorization system
Should libraries discontinue using and maintaining controlled subject vocabul...
Should libraries discontinue using and maintaining controlled subject vocabul...
#Socialtagging: Defining its role in the academic library
#Socialtagging: Defining its role in the academic library
Porting Library Vocabularies to the Semantic Web - IFLA 2010
Porting Library Vocabularies to the Semantic Web - IFLA 2010
Taxonomies for Publishing: Enhancing the User Experience
Taxonomies for Publishing: Enhancing the User Experience
Social Web 2.0 Class Week 8: Social Metadata, Ratings, Social Tagging
Social Web 2.0 Class Week 8: Social Metadata, Ratings, Social Tagging
IFLA 2010 Poster 72 presentation, Gothenburg, Sweden
IFLA 2010 Poster 72 presentation, Gothenburg, Sweden
Creating Global Community of Library Users With Open Hybrid Taxonomy and Folk...
Creating Global Community of Library Users With Open Hybrid Taxonomy and Folk...
Recently uploaded
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdHow to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar KanvariaRPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS Template 2023-2024 by: Irene S. Rueco
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Qualitative research interview training by Professor Katrina Pritchard and Dr Helen Williams
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcAdvanced Java[Extra Concepts, Not Difficult].docx
This is part 2 of my Java Learning Journey. This contains Hashing, ArrayList, LinkedList, Date and Time Classes, Calendar Class and more.
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
Recently uploaded (20)
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
It Final Presentation
- 1. Social Cataloging in the Libraries Charlie Terng 610:550:02 December 03, 2009
- 2. Main Issue: Traditional classification system (controlled vocabulary) - vs - Social tagging
- 3. Terminology Controlled vocabulary An organized collection of words/phrases/names, structured to show the relationships between terms and concepts. Examples: LCSH, MeSH. Tags User-generated metadata used to describe the “aboutness” of an object.
- 4. Main differences Controlled vocab: Authoritative. Structured as a hierarchy. Ordered, systematic way to search for information. Tagging: Derived by the general public. Unstructured. More approachable, user-friendly way to search.
- 5. Issues with controlled vocabulary Hierarchy structure and specific terminology requires users to be knowledgeable or familiar in the subject area. Pre-determined listing takes user element out of it. “Look, but don't touch”. Non-interactive.
- 6. What tags can offer Cataloging system based on terms used by “regular people”. More intuitive way of searching. Free-flow path, no hierarchical structure. Current, up-to-date terms. Most importantly, more access points.
- 7. Example
- 8. Example Library of Congress Subject Headings
- 10. So why not just use tags? Quality/relevance of tags may vary (i.e., “spagging”). Tag clouds, evaluation by librarians are possible solution. Issues with specificity (i.e., squirrel topics). Although, LT's new “Tagmash” seems to fix this. Controlled vocabulary better for total recall.
- 11. Which should OPACs use? Not “either or”, but an integration of both. Their strengths cover each other's weaknesses. Different situations call for different methods. They also work well together. It's all about increasing access points.
- 12. LTFL is on the job 1,512 libraries served. 37 in NJ: LOGIN (20 libraries) Atlantic County System (10 libraries) Mount Laurel East Brunswick Public Camden County College Highland Park Public Cranbury Public
- 14. LibraryThing perks I see dead people's books. Tagmash Reviews, recommendations, booklists, etc. Will I like this?